DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a County Codes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a County Codes SEER Program Coding and Staging Manual 2021 Appendix A County Codes Appendix A: County Codes SEER Program Coding and Staging Manual 2021 Appendix A lists the valid county codes for coding county of residence at diagnosis for SEER states and regions. Reference: United States Census Bureau. Technical Documentation https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/technical-documentation/county-changes.html https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/2019/demo/popest/2019-fips.html In alphabetical order by name of SEER state or region large geographically to provide a suitable basis for data Alaska (AK) Native Americans – analysis, the State of Alaska and the Bureau of the Census SEER Area have divided it into “census areas” for statistical purposes. The census areas are identified in the list by “(CA)” The following is a complete list of all current following the name. Data systems that use the unorganized borough may code it as 999. Changes since the 1980s: Alaska county equivalents where (B) identifies a Aleutian Islands (CA) (010) was replaced by Aleutians East borough or municipality and (CA) identifies a (1978 October 23) and Aleutians West (CA) (1990 January census area) 1); Kobuk (CA) (140) was replaced by Northwest Arctic (1986 June 2); Lake and Peninsula was established from part of Dillingham (CA) (1989 April 24). Wrangell City and Code County Borough (02-275) was created from part of the former 013* Aleutians East (B) Wrangell-Petersburg CA (02-280) and part of Prince of 016 Aleutians West (CA) Wales-Outer Ketchikan CA (02-201) (Meyers Chuck area) 020* Anchorage (B) (2008 June 1). The remainder of the former Wrangell- Petersburg CA was established as the new Petersburg CA 050 Bethel (CA) (02-195) (2008 June 1). Petersburg CA (02-195) was 060* Bristol Bay (B) created from the remainder of the former Wrangell- 063 Chugach (CA) Petersburg CA (02-280) when the new Wrangell City and 066 Copper River (CA) Borough was created (2008 June 1). Prince of Wales-Hyder 068* Denali (B) CA (02-198) was created from the remainder of the former Prince of Wales-Outer Ketchikan CA (02-201) after part 070 Dillingham (CA) (Outer Ketchikan area) was annexed by Ketchikan Gateway 090* Fairbanks North Star (B) Borough (02-130) (2008 May 19), and part (Meyers Chuck 100* Haines (B) area) included in the new Wrangell City and Borough 105 Hoonah-Angoon (CA) (2008 June 1). Skagway Municipality (02-230) was created from part of the former Skagway-Hoonah-Angoon CA (02- 110* Juneau (B) 232) (2007 June 20). The remainder of the former 122* Kenai Peninsula (B) Skagway-Hoonah-Angoon CA was established as the new 130* Ketchikan Gateway (B) Hoonah-Angoon CA (02-105). Hoonah-Angoon CA (02- 150* Kodiak Island (B) 105) was created from the remainder of the former 158 Kusilvak (CA) Skagway-Hoonah-Angoon (CA) (02-232) when the new Skagway Municipality (02-230) was created (2007 June 164* Lake and Peninsula (B) 20). Petersburg Borough (02-195) was created from part of 170* Matanuska-Susitna (B) former Petersburg CA (02-195) and part of Hoonah- 180 Nome (CA) Angoon CA (02-105) (2013 January 3). Prince of Wales- 185* North Slope (B) Hyder CA (02-198) added part of the former Petersburg CA (02-195) (2013 January 3). Hoonah-Angoon CA (02-105) 188* Northwest Arctic (B) was taken in part to create new Petersburg Borough (02- 195* Petersburg (B) 195) (2013 January 3). Wade Hampton Census Area (02- 198 Prince of Wales-Hyder (CA) 270) changed name and code to Kusilvak CA (02-158) 220* Sitka (B) (2015 July 1). Chugach Census Area (02-063) created from 230* Skagway (B) part of former Valdez-Cordova Census Area (02-261) (2019 January 02). Copper River Census Area (02-066) created 240 Southeast Fairbanks (CA) from part of former Valdez-Cordova Census Area (02-261) 275* Wrangell (B) (2019 January 02). Valdez-Cordova Census Area (02-261) 282* Yakutat (B) split to for Chugach Census Area (02-063 and Copper 290 Yukon-Koyukuk (CA) River Census Area (02-066) (2019 January 02). * The legally defined first-order subdivisions of Alaska are called boroughs (B). The portion of Alaska that is not within organized boroughs is covered by a single “unorganized borough,” a legal entity administered by the State government. Because the unorganized borough is too Appendix A: County Codes A-1 SEER Program Coding and Staging Manual 2021 Arizona (AZ) Native Americans – Code County SEER Area 043 Mariposa (Greater California) 045 Mendocino (Greater California) 047 Merced (Greater California) Code County 049 Modoc (Greater California) 001 Apache 051 Mono (Greater California) 003 Cochise 053* Monterey (San Jose-Monterey) 005 Coconino 055 Napa (Greater California) 007 Gila 057 Nevada (Greater California) 009 Graham 059 Orange (Greater California) 011 Greenlee 061 Placer (Greater California) 012* La Paz 063 Plumas (Greater California) 013 Maricopa 065 Riverside (Greater California) 015 Mohave 067 Sacramento (Greater California) 017 Navajo 069* San Benito (San Jose-Monterey) 019 Pima 071 San Bernardino (Greater California) 021 Pinal 073 San Diego (Greater California) 023 Santa Cruz 075 San Francisco (San Francisco- 025 Yavapai Oakland SMSA) 027* Yuma 077 San Joaquin(Greater California) * La Paz was established from part of Yuma effective January 079 San Luis Obispo (Greater California) 1, 1983. Cases diagnosed 1973-1982 were reviewed and 081 San Mateo (San Francisco-Oakland recoded as needed to La Paz County. However, for analysis purposes, SEER combines the data for La Paz with Yuma, SMSA) for all years. 083 Santa Barbara (Greater California) 085* Santa Clara (San Jose-Monterey) 087* Santa Cruz (San Jose-Monterey) California (CA) – SEER Area 089 Shasta (Greater California) 091 Sierra (Greater California) Code County 093 Siskiyou (Greater California) 001 Alameda (San Francisco-Oakland 095 Solano (Greater California) SMSA) 097 Sonoma (Greater California) 003 Alpine (Greater California) 099 Stanislaus (Greater California) 005 Amador (Greater California) 101 Sutter (Greater California) 007 Butte (Greater California) 103 Tehama (Greater California) 009 Calaveras (Greater California) 105 Trinity (Greater California) 011 Colusa (Greater California) 107 Tulare (Greater California) 013 Contra Costa (San Francisco-Oakland 109 Tuolumne (Greater California) SMSA) 111 Ventura (Greater California) 015 Del Norte (Greater California) 113 Yolo (Greater California) 017 El Dorado (Greater California) 115 Yuba (Greater California) 019 Fresno (Greater California) * Conversion table required: 021 Glenn (Greater California) 2004 Description Pre-2004 023 Humboldt (Greater California) 053 Monterey 027 025 Imperial (Greater California) 069 San Benito 035 027 Inyo (Greater California) 085 Santa Clara 043 029 Kern (Greater California) 087 Santa Cruz 044 031 Kings (Greater California) 033 Lake (Greater California) 035 Lassen (Greater California) Connecticut (CT) – SEER Area 037 Los Angeles (Los Angeles) 039 Madera (Greater California) Code County 041 Marin (San Francisco-Oakland 001 Fairfield SMSA) 003 Hartford Appendix A: County Codes A-2 SEER Program Coding and Staging Manual 2021 Code County Code County 005 Litchfield 069 Coffee 007 Middlesex 071 Colquitt 009 New Haven 073 Columbia 011 New London 075 Cook 013 Tolland 077 Coweta 015 Windham 079 Crawford 081 Crisp 083 Dade Detroit (Metropolitan) – SEER Area 085 Dawson 087 Decatur Code County 089 DeKalb 099 Macomb 091 Dodge 125 Oakland 093 Dooly 163 Wayne 095 Dougherty 097 Douglas 099 Early 101 Echols Georgia (GA) – SEER Area 103 Effingham 105 Elbert Code County 107 Emanuel 001 Appling 109 Evans 003 Atkinson 111 Fannin 005 Bacon 113 Fayette 007 Baker 115 Floyd 009 Baldwin 117 Forsyth 011 Banks 119 Franklin 013 Barrow 121 Fulton 015 Bartow 123 Gilmer 017 Ben Hill 125 Glascock 019 Berrien 127 Glynn 021 Bibb 129 Gordon 023 Bleckley 131 Grady 025 Brantley 133 Greene 027 Brooks 135 Gwinnett 029 Bryan 137 Habersham 031 Bulloch 139 Hall 033 Burke 141 Hancock 035 Butts 143 Haralson 037 Calhoun 145 Harris 039 Camden 147 Hart 043 Candler 149 Heard 045 Carroll 151 Henry 047 Catoosa 153 Houston 049 Charlton 155 Irwin 051 Chatham 157 Jackson 053 Chattahoochee 159 Jasper 055 Chattooga 161 Jeff Davis 057 Cherokee 163 Jefferson 059 Clarke 165 Jenkins 061 Clay 167 Johnson 063 Clayton 169 Jones 065 Clinch 171 Lamar 067 Cobb Appendix A: County Codes A-3 SEER Program Coding and Staging Manual 2021 Code County Code County 173 Lanier 279 Toombs 175 Laurens 281 Towns 177 Lee 283 Treutlen 179 Liberty 285 Troup 181 Lincoln 287 Turner 183 Long 289 Twiggs 185 Lowndes 291 Union 187 Lumpkin 293 Upson 189 McDuffie 295 Walker 191 McIntosh 297 Walton 193 Macon 299 Ware 195 Madison 301 Warren 197 Marion 303 Washington 199 Meriwether 305 Wayne 201 Miller 307 Webster 205 Mitchell 309 Wheeler 207 Monroe 311 White 209 Montgomery 313 Whitfield 211 Morgan 315 Wilcox 213 Murray 317 Wilkes 215* Muscogee 319 Wilkinson 217 Newton 321 Worth 219 Oconee * Muscogee was reported incorrectly as “Columbus 221 Oglethorpe (consolidated government)” (510) in former NIST FIPS 223 Paulding PUB 6-3. 225 Peach 227 Pickens 229 Pierce Hawaii (HI) – SEER Area 231 Pike 233 Polk Code County 235 Pulaski 001 Hawaii 237 Putnam 003 Honolulu 239 Quitman 005* Kalawao 241 Rabun 007 Kauai 243 Randolph 009* Maui 245 Richmond 247 Rockdale *Kalawao was established from part of Maui during the 1970s. Kalawao does not have its own local government; it 249 Schley is administered by the State of Hawaii. It may be included 251 Screven with Maui for statistical purposes. For analysis purposes, 253 Seminole SEER combines data for all Hawaii counties.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Government Primer
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT PRIMER Alaska Municipal League Alaskan Local Government Primer Alaska Municipal League The Alaska Municipal League (AML) is a voluntary, Table of Contents nonprofit, nonpartisan, statewide organization of 163 cities, boroughs, and unified municipalities, Purpose of Primer............ Page 3 representing over 97 percent of Alaska's residents. Originally organized in 1950, the League of Alaska Cities............................Pages 4-5 Cities became the Alaska Municipal League in 1962 when boroughs joined the League. Boroughs......................Pages 6-9 The mission of the Alaska Municipal League is to: Senior Tax Exemption......Page 10 1. Represent the unified voice of Alaska's local Revenue Sharing.............Page 11 governments to successfully influence state and federal decision making. 2. Build consensus and partnerships to address Alaska's Challenges, and Important Local Government Facts: 3. Provide training and joint services to strengthen ♦ Mill rates are calculated by directing the Alaska's local governments. governing body to determine the budget requirements and identifying all revenue sources. Alaska Conference of Mayors After the budget amount is reduced by subtracting revenue sources, the residual is the amount ACoM is the parent organization of the Alaska Mu- required to be raised by the property tax.That nicipal League. The ACoM and AML work together amount is divided by the total assessed value and to form a municipal consensus on statewide and the result is identified as a “mill rate”. A “mill” is federal issues facing Alaskan local governments. 1/1000 of a dollar, so the mill rate simply states the amount of tax to be charged per $1,000 of The purpose of the Alaska Conference of Mayors assessed value.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Slope Borough, Oil, and the Future of Local Government in Alaska
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 1973 The North Slope Borough, Oil, and the Future of Local Government in Alaska David H. Getches University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Legal History Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Taxation-State and Local Commons, and the Tax Law Commons Citation Information David H. Getches, The North Slope Borough, Oil, and the Future of Local Government in Alaska, 3 UCLA- ALASKA L. REV. 55 (1973), available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/1127. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Originally published as David H. Getches, North Slope Borough, Oil, and the Future of Local Government in Alaska, 3 UCLA-ALASKA L. REV. 55 (1973). Reprinted with permission of William S. Hein & Co., Inc., and the David H. Getches family. +(,1 2 1/,1( Citation: 3 UCLA Alaska L.
    [Show full text]
  • Realities of Relocation for Alaska Native Villages
    CLIMATE CHANGE: REALITIES OF RELOCATION FOR ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGES Introduction As temperatures across the Arctic rise at twice the global average, the impacts of climate change in Alaska are already being felt (IPCC 2007). Warming temperatures exacerbate problems of permafrost erosion, flooding, and melting ice barriers, making an already unpredictable environment even more volatile (GAO 2004). Alaska Natives are among the most impacted in this region, and, according to the Government Accountability Office (2004), flooding and erosion affects 86% of Alaska Native villages to some extent. As a consequence of the changing living conditions, Alaska Native communities are being forced to relocate their homes in what is called the first wave of U.S. climate refugees (Sakakibara 2010), reflecting the war‐like effects of climate change. However, relocating is a culturally damaging, expensive, and politically complex process that only a few villages have begun. While a small number of Alaska Native communities are considering relocation, the situation continues to worsen: in a 2004 report, the GAO reported that flooding and erosion imminently threatened four villages. By 2009, that number had risen to thirty‐one villages. Understanding Relocation Extreme weather in Alaska is not a new phenomenon, and Alaska Natives are accustomed to adapting to its effects. Traditionally, many communities would adapt to the seasonal variability by migrating between hunting grounds throughout the year. However, beginning around the turn of the 20th century, Alaska Natives were forced to settle by the U.S. government, creating a dependence on the immediate area and subsequent vulnerability to events like erosion and flooding (MOVE 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-09-551 Alaska Native Villages
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters GAO June 2009 ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGES Limited Progress Has Been Made on Relocating Villages Threatened by Flooding and Erosion GAO-09-551 June 2009 Accountability Integrity Reliability ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGES Highlights Limited Progress Has Been Made on Relocating Highlights of GAO-09-551, a report to Villages Threatened by Flooding and Erosion congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In December 2003, GAO reported While the flooding and erosion threats to Alaska Native villages have not been that most of Alaska’s more than completely assessed, since 2003, federal, state, and village officials have 200 Native villages were affected to identified 31 villages that face imminent threats. The U.S. Army Corps of some degree by flooding and Engineers’ (Corps) March 2009 Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment erosion (GAO-04-142). Since 2003, identified many villages threatened by erosion, but did not assess flooding state officials have identified the growing impacts of climate change, impacts. At least 12 of the 31 threatened villages have decided to relocate—in increasing the urgency of federal part or entirely—or to explore relocation options. and state efforts to identify imminently threatened villages and Federal programs to assist threatened villages prepare for and recover from assess their relocation options. disasters and to protect and relocate them are limited and unavailable to some GAO was asked to report on (1) the villages. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has several disaster flooding and erosion threats that preparedness and recovery programs, but villages often fail to qualify for Alaska Native villages currently them, generally because they may lack approved disaster mitigation plans or face, (2) the federal programs that have not been declared federal disaster areas.
    [Show full text]
  • ALASKA and Nonprofit Affairs of Alaska Natives
    ALASKA and nonprofit affairs of Alaska Natives. They Alaska ranks 48th among the states in number were established under a federal law, the of local governments, with 177 active as of Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. There are October 2007. 12 regional corporations that cover the entire state, except for Annette Islands Reserve, BOROUGH GOVERNMENTS (14) which is an American Indian reservation. A thirteenth regional corporation was established The borough governments in Alaska resemble for Alaska Natives who are not permanent county governments in other states. However, residents of the state and who have not the borough governments do not encompass enrolled in one of the other 12 regional the entire area of the state. The following areas corporations. These corporate entities are not of the state are located outside the areas counted as governments for census purposes. served by borough governments: Alaska Native Villages are tribes, bands, clans, Areas served by consolidated city-borough groups, villages, communities, or associations governments in Alaska that are recognized under the Alaska Areas within the "unorganized borough" Native Claims Settlement Act. Alaska Native Villages do not cross Alaska Native Regional There are three consolidated city-borough Corporation boundaries. These entities are not governments in Alaska: Anchorage, Juneau, counted as governments for census purposes. and Sitka. These three governments are counted for census reporting as municipal SUBBOROUGH GENERAL PURPOSE governments rather than as borough GOVERNMENTS (148) governments. Alaska statutes treat all areas of the state outside the boundaries of organized Municipal Governments (148) borough or consolidated city-borough governments as a single "unorganized The term "municipality," as defined for census borough." statistics on governments, applies only to the cities in Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • November 11, 2020 Assembly Meeting Minutes
    1 Denali Borough Assembly 2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting 3 Virtual Meeting 4 November 11, 2020 5 6 WORK SESSION 7 ORDINANCE 20-15: LOCAL OPTION ZONING 8 Presiding Officer Jared ZIMMERMAN called the work session to order at 6:05 PM. 9 10 The following concerns regarding Ordinance 20-15 were discussed during the work session: 11 • Providing flexibility for local option zoning districts to select more than one zoning 12 category. 13 • Ensure that due process for landowners is protected during any local option zoning 14 district formation process. 15 • Clarify protection for existing land uses after local option zoning district formation. 16 17 Presiding Officer Jared ZIMMERMAN adjourned the work session at 7:11 PM. 18 19 PUBLIC HEARING 20 Presiding Officer Jared ZIMMERMAN called the public hearing to order at 7:11 PM. 21 22 ORDINANCE 20-03: BASELINE ADDRESSING SYSTEM 23 McKinley Village area resident Steve Jones encouraged the assembly to make a decision 24 on a system of addressing expressing that any system of addressing is better than having 25 no addressing in our borough. 26 27 Panguingue Creek area resident Susan Braun expressed support for the Baseline 28 Addressing system stating that the baseline system will be easier for future generations to 29 maintain. 30 31 ORDINANCE 20-15: LOCAL OPTION ZONING 32 There were no comments. 33 34 ORDINANCE 20-18: BISON GULCH/ANTLER CREEK EASEMENT REQUEST 35 There were no comments. 36 37 ORDINANCE 20-19: CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE COVID RESPONSE FOR 38 ELECTIONS GRANT Denali Borough Assembly Page 1 of 6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting November 11, 2020 Page 1 of 14 1 There were no comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Municipal League Alaskan Local Government Primer 2019 Toolkit Page 80 of 134 Alaska Municipal League
    2019 Toolkit Page 36 of 134 How to Run for Local Office The Job - _... .. ... _, ,- -'?;o_,.-'<.........-~......_~~-, - ,,. ,, • •' ~ ~ • '' , ' ,; ' , .••.. •' ,.. ,•, - 2019 Toolkit Page 37 of 134 A Citizen’s Guide to City and Borough of Juneau Government What is CBJ? Article 10 of the Alaska State Constitutions, Section 1 states in part: “The purpose of this article is to provide for maximum local self-government with a minimum of local government units, and to prevent duplication of tax-levying jurisdictions” In 1970, the voters of the City of Juneau, the City of Douglas, and the Greater Juneau Borough voted to dissolve their respective governments and created the City and Borough of Juneau (CBJ), a “Home Rule Municipality.” At that time, the voters adopted a Charter, which is similar to a local constitution. The Charter outlines the powers, organization, and procedures of the municipality, and is implemented through locally adopted ordinances, which become the Municipal Code. The state constitution provides that home rule municipalities may exercise all legislative powers not prohibited by law or by charter. The limits to the power CBJ is able to exercise are found in Alaska Statute 29.10.200. Any changes to the Charter must be approved by the voters in a municipal election. What is the role of the Assembly? The Assembly is the governing body of the municipality. The Assembly has the legislative and policy-making powers of the municipality and ensures that all duties and obligations of the Charter are met. The Assembly sets the policy direction for the Manager and staff to enact, as CBJ has a "City Manager" form of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacant Lot West C Street Nome, Alaska Formerly Known As 501 W
    Office of Real Property Utilization and Disposal U.S. General Services Administration Invitation for Bids SALE OF GOVERNMENT REAL PROPERTY Vacant Lot West C Street Nome, Alaska Formerly Known As 501 W. 4th Avenue IFB Number ZEATL919290001 Issued on October 25, 2018 The property is located at West C Street, Nome, Alaska, 99762. The property contains 3,500+/- sq. ft. or 0.0803+/- acres of land. Bids for the purchase of the Government-owned Property described in the Property Description portion of this Invitation for Bids will be received continuously and will be posted at RealEstateSales.gov. U.S. General Services Administration Invitation for Bids SALE OF GOVERNMENT REAL PROPERTY Vacant Lot West C Street formerly known as 501 W. 4th Avenue, Nome, AK 99762 Auction Summary Send Bid Form and Registration Deposit to: Sale Type: Online Auction U.S. General Services Administration Real Property Utilization and Disposal (9PZF) th Start Date: November 15, 2018, 11:00 a.m. CT 400 15 St SW, Auburn, WA 98001 Attn: Andrew Schwartz End Date: Based on Bidding Property Disposal Web Page Starting Bid: $5,000.00 https://propertydisposal.gsa.gov Registration Deposit: $2,000.00 Inspection Opportunities: Bid Increment: $1,000.00 The property may be inspected during daylight hours. Please do not disturb the neighbors. Sales Information Andrew Schwartz 253-931-7556 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Online Auction RealEstateSales.gov Property Description ........................... page 3 Register and submit your bid Terms of Sale ...................................... page 4 Instructions to Bidders ......................... page 9 Online Auction Assistance Notices and Covenants ........................ page 15 Lisa Roundtree Bidder Registration and Bid Form.......
    [Show full text]
  • Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska General Obligation School Bonds, 2008 Series L $11,128,000
    Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska General Obligation School Bonds, 2008 Series L $11,128,000 Dated: Date of delivery Due: November 1, as shown on inside cover Book-Entry Only Ratings: Insured: Fitch Ratings: AAA Standard & Poor’s: AAA Uninsured: Fitch Ratings: A+ Standard & Poor’s: A+ Tax Exemption: Interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Page 4 Redemption: The Bonds are subject to redemption prior to their stated date of maturity. Page 1. Security: To secure payment of the Bonds, the Borough has covenanted that, unless the principal of and interest on the Bonds are paid from other sources, it will levy taxes annually without limitation as to rate or amount upon all property within the Borough subject to taxation in amounts sufficient to pay such principal and interest as the same shall become due. Page 2. The Bonds are eligible for reimbursement of 70 percent of debt service from the State of Alaska. Page 12 Purpose: The Bonds will be used to finance school improvements in the Borough. Page 11. Interest Payment Dates: May 1 and November 1, beginning November 1, 2008, and according to the schedules shown on inside cover. Sale: January 8, 2008. Closing: On or about January 25, 2008. Denominations: $5,000 or multiple thereof, except for one bond of $8,000 maturing in 2008. Registrar/Paying Agent: U.S. Bank National Association, Seattle, Washington Bond Counsel: K&L Preston Gates Ellis LLP, Seattle, Washington. Borough Attorney: René Broker, Fairbanks, Alaska. Financial Advisor: Bartle Wells Associates, Berkeley, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Original STIP; Approved April 28, 2020
    State of Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities 2020-2023 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Original Approved April 28, 2020 “Keep Alaska Moving through service and infrastructure.” Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect How to Reach Us STIP Contact Information Division of Program Development P.O. Box 112500 3132 Channel Drive, Suite 200 Juneau, AK 99811-2500 PHONE: (907) 465-4070 (in Juneau) FAX: (907) 465-6984 (in Juneau) ALASKA RELAY: 711 Northern Region Planning Phone: (907) 451-2252 EMAIL: [email protected] Fax: (907) 451-2313 INTERNET: http://www.dot.state.ak.us [email protected] Central Region Planning Phone: (907) 269-0520 Fax: (907) 269-0521 [email protected] Southcoast Region Planning Phone: (907) 465-8864 Fax: (907) 465-2016 [email protected] Anchorage Metropolitan Area Fairbanks Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions Transportation System AMATS Coordinator FMATS MPO Coordinator Municipality of Anchorage City of Fairbanks P.O. Box 196650 800 Cushman Street Anchorage, AK 99519-6650 Fairbanks, AK 99701-4615 PHONE: (907) 343-7996 PHONE: (907) 459-6786 FAX: (907) 343-7998 FAX: (907) 459-6783 [email protected] [email protected] DOT&PF Anchorage Area Planner DOT&PF Fairbanks Area Planner P.O. Box 196900 2301 Peger Road Anchorage, AK 99519-6900 Fairbanks, AK 99709-5316 PHONE: (907) 269-0507 PHONE: (907) 451-2386 FAX: (907) 269-0521 FAX: (907) 451-2313 [email protected] [email protected] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ALASKA DIVISION 709 W. 9TH STREET, ROOM 851 P.O. BOX 21648 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99802-1648 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION 915 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 3142 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98174 April 28, 2020 John MacKinnon, Commissioner Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities PO Box 112500 3132 Channel Drive Juneau, AK 99811 Dear Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Voting Rights in Alaska: 1982–2006
    VOTING RIGHTS IN ALASKA: 1982–2006 NATALIE LANDRETH* AND MOIRA SMITH† I. INTRODUCTION TO THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT As the expiration date of the Voting Rights Act’s minority language assistance provisions, Sections 2031 and 4(f)(4),2 and preclearance provi- sion, Section 5,3 approaches,4 Congress will consider the current state of discrimination in voting and will determine whether these provisions are still needed.5 The Voting Rights Act (VRA) was passed in 1965 with a five-year sunset provision; it was renewed in 1982. Section 203 was re- newed in 1992 for fifteen years in the Voting Rights Language Assistance Act of 1992.6 The Act’s temporary provisions are set to expire on August 6, 2007,7 unless reauthorized by Congress. This report will address Alaska’s experience under the minority language and preclearance provi- sions. Alaska is covered in its entirety by Sections 5 and 4(f)(4) and is par- tially covered by Section 203 of the VRA. Alaska has the largest percent- * Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Anchorage, Alaska; J.D. Harvard Law School 2001; B.A. magna cum laude Harvard University 1996; enrolled member, Chickasaw Nation of Okla- homa. † Law Clerk, Alaska Court System; J.D. University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law 2007; B.S.F.S. Georgetown University School of Foreign Service 1998. 1 42 U.S.C. § 1973aa-1a (2000). 2 Id. § 1973b(f)(4). 3 Id. § 1973c. 4 After this report was written and submitted to Congress, the minority language and preclearance provisions of the VRA were renewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions of Borough Incorporation Held by Community Leaders in Delta Junction, Alaska
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2008 Perceptions of Borough Incorporation Held by Community Leaders in Delta Junction, Alaska Michelle Albus Johnson The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Johnson, Michelle Albus, "Perceptions of Borough Incorporation Held by Community Leaders in Delta Junction, Alaska" (2008). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 741. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/741 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PERCEPTIONS OF BOROUGH INCORPORATION HELD BY COMMUNITY LEADERS IN DELTA JUNCTION, ALASKA By Michelle Albus Johnson Bachelor of Arts, University of Portland, Portland, Oregon, 2002 Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts In Sociology, Rural and Environmental Change The University of Montana Missoula, Montana Spring 2008 Approved by: Dr. David Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Rebecca Richards, Chair Department of Sociology Dr. David Shively Department of Geography Dr. Nancy Arnold The Rural Institute: Center for Excellence in Disability Education, Research, and Service Johnson, Michelle, M.A., May 2008 Sociology Perceptions of Borough Incorporation held by community leaders in Delta Junction, Alaska Chairperson: Dr. Rebecca Richards Regional governments exist in an overwhelming majority of the United States and are often considered a necessary and natural progression of a developing region.
    [Show full text]