Open Source Software Used in Cisco Nexus 1000V for Vmware Vsphere, Release 5.2(1)SV3(2.5)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Knot DNS Resolver Release 1.2.0
Knot DNS Resolver Release 1.2.0 CZ.NIC Labs Apr 25, 2017 Contents 1 Building project 3 1.1 Installing from packages.........................................3 1.2 Platform considerations.........................................3 1.3 Requirements...............................................3 1.4 Building from sources..........................................5 1.5 Getting Docker image..........................................7 2 Knot DNS Resolver library 9 2.1 Requirements...............................................9 2.2 For users.................................................9 2.3 For developers..............................................9 2.4 Writing layers.............................................. 11 2.5 APIs in Lua................................................ 12 2.6 API reference............................................... 15 3 Knot DNS Resolver daemon 47 3.1 Enabling DNSSEC............................................ 47 3.2 CLI interface............................................... 48 3.3 Scaling out................................................ 48 3.4 Running supervised........................................... 49 3.5 Configuration............................................... 49 3.6 Using CLI tools............................................. 64 4 Knot DNS Resolver modules 67 4.1 Static hints................................................ 67 4.2 Statistics collector............................................ 69 4.3 Query policies.............................................. 71 4.4 Views and ACLs............................................ -
Server: Apache
Modern Trends in Network Fingerprinting SecTor [11.21.07] Jay Graver Ryan Poppa // Fingerprinting Topics Why, What, Who & How? Tools in action Why Tools Break Tools EOL New Approaches New Tool // Why Fingerprint? WhiteHat needs accurate identification of hosts in a PenTest report BlackHat reconnaissance SysAdmins track down and identify new services or hosts when they appear on their network // What is a Fingerprint? Looking at something common … 192.168.2.187:8004 192.168.2.187 [152] 48 54 54 50 2f 31 2e 31 20 32 30 30 20 4f 4b 0d HTTP/1.1 200 OK. 0a 43 6f 6e 6e 65 63 74 69 6f 6e 3a 20 63 6c 6f .Connection: clo 73 65 0d 0a 41 6c 6c 6f 77 3a 20 4f 50 54 49 4f se..Allow: OPTIO 4e 53 2c 20 47 45 54 2c 20 48 45 41 44 2c 20 50 NS, GET, HEAD, P 4f 53 54 0d 0a 43 6f 6e 74 65 6e 74 2d 4c 65 6e OST..Content‐Len 67 74 68 3a 20 30 0d 0a 44 61 74 65 3a 20 46 72 gth: 0..Date: Fr 69 2c 20 30 32 20 4e 6f 76 20 32 30 30 37 20 32 i, 02 Nov 2007 2 32 3a 32 35 3a 31 38 20 47 4d 54 0d 0a 53 65 72 2:25:18 GMT..Ser 76 65 72 3a 20 6c 69 67 68 74 74 70 64 2f 31 2e ver: lighttpd/1. 34 2e 31 35 0d 0a 0d 0a 4.15... -
Safeguard for Privileged Passwords 6.0.9 LTS Release Notes
Safeguard for Privileged Passwords 6.0.9 LTS Release Notes 03 March 2021, 06:20 These release notes provide information about the Safeguard for Privileged Passwords 6.0.9 LTS release. If you are updating a Safeguard for Privileged Passwords version prior to this release, read the release notes for the version found at: One Identity Safeguard for Privileged Passwords Technical Documentation. For the most recent documents and product information, see One Identity Safeguard for Privileged Passwords Technical Documentation. Release options Safeguard for Privileged Passwords includes two release versions: l Long Term Support (LTS) release, version 6.0.9 LTS l Feature release, version 6.9 The versions align with Safeguard for Privileged Sessions. For more information, see Long Term Support (LTS) and Feature Releases on page 13. About this release Safeguard for Privileged Passwords Version 6.0.9 LTS is a minor LTS release with resolved issues. For more details on the features and resolved issues, see: Safeguard for Privileged Passwords 6.0.9 LTS 1 Release Notes l Resolved issues NOTE: For a full list of key features in Safeguard for Privileged Passwords, see the Safeguard for Privileged Passwords Administration Guide. About the Safeguard product line The Safeguard for Privileged Passwords Appliance is built specifically for use only with the Safeguard for Privileged Passwords privileged management software, which is pre- installed and ready for immediate use. The appliance is hardened to ensure the system is secured at the hardware, operating system, and software levels. The hardened appliance approach protects the privileged management software from attacks while simplifying deployment and ongoing management and shortening the time frame to value. -
Efficient Parallel I/O on Multi-Core Architectures
Lecture series title/ lecture title Efficient parallel I/O on multi-core architectures Adrien Devresse CERN IT-SDC-ID Thematic CERN School of Computing 2014 1 Author(s) names – Affiliation Lecture series title/ lecture title How to make I/O bound application scale with multi-core ? What is an IO bound application ? → A server application → A job that accesses big number of files → An application that uses intensively network 2 Author(s) names – Affiliation Lecture series title/ lecture title Stupid example: Simple server monothreaded // create socket socket_desc = socket(AF_INET , SOCK_STREAM , 0); // bind the socket bind(socket_desc,(struct sockaddr *)&server , sizeof(server)); listen(socket_desc , 100); //accept connection from an incoming client while(1){ // declarations client_sock = accept(socket_desc, (struct sockaddr *)&client, &c); //Receive a message from client while( (read_size = recv(client_sock , client_message , 2000 , 0)) > 0{ // Wonderful, we have a client, do some useful work std::string msg("hello bob"); write(client_sock, msg.c_str(), msg.size()); } } 3 Author(s) names – Affiliation Lecture series title/ lecture title Stupid example: Let's make it parallel ! int main(int argc, char** argv){ // creat socket void do_work(int socket){ socket_desc = socket(AF_INET , SOCK_STREAM , 0); //Receive a message while( (read_size = // bind the socket recv(client_sock , bind(socket_desc, server , sizeof(server)); client_message , 2000 , 0)) > 0{ listen(socket_desc , 100); // Wonderful, we have a client // useful works //accept connection -
Message Passing and Network Programming
Message Passing and Network Programming Advanced Operating Systems Lecture 13 Colin Perkins | https://csperkins.org/ | Copyright © 2017 | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. Lecture Outline • Actors, sockets, and network protocols • Asynchronous I/O frameworks • Higher level abstractions Colin Perkins | https://csperkins.org/ | Copyright © 2017 2 Message Passing and Network Protocols • Recap: • Actor-based framework for message passing Send to • Each actor has a receive loop other actors Mailbox Actor Calls to one function per state Queue • Receive Message • Messages delivered by runtime system; Receiver processed sequentially Message Done Message Process • Actor can send messages in reply; Message Dispatcher return identity of next state Dequeue • Can we write network code this way? Request next • Send data by sending a message to an actor representing a socket • Receive messages representing data received on a socket Colin Perkins | https://csperkins.org/ | Copyright © 2017 3 Integrating Actors and Sockets Sending Thread Send to other actors Encoder Network Socket Mailbox Actor Queue Parser Receive Message Receiver Message Done Receiving Thread Message Process Message Dispatcher • Conceptually straightforward to integrate Dequeue actors with network code Request next • Runtime system maintains sending and -
Copyright by Tongliang Liao 2017
Copyright by Tongliang Liao 2017 The Thesis committee for Tongliang Liao certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: TAI: Threaded Asynchronous I/O Library for Performance and Portability APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Vijaychidambaram Velayudhan Pillai, Supervisor Simon Peter TAI: Threaded Asynchronous I/O Library for Performance and Portability by Tongliang Liao Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Computer Science The University of Texas at Austin Dec 2017 TAI: Threaded Asynchronous I/O Library for Performance and Portability by Tongliang Liao, M.S.C.S The University of Texas at Austin, 2017 Supervisor: Vijaychidambaram Velayudhan Pillai In this paper, we investigate the behavior and performance of disk I/O using different types of libraries. We analyze the scenario where we can benefit from asyn- chronous I/O, and propose our cross-platform library design called TAI (Threaded Async I/O). TAI is designed to be a C++17 library with developer-friendly API. Our benchmark shows it can out-perform other libraries when asynchronous I/O is beneficial, and keep competitive speed in other cases. It also demonstrates TAI’s ability to retrieve 20% - 60% speedup on poorly scaled serial code by a simple library replacement. iv Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Related Work .................................................................................. 2 1.2 Background ..................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 POSIX Sync I/O ................................................................... 3 1.2.2 POSIX AIO .......................................................................... 3 1.2.3 C/C++ Standard I/O Functions............................................ -
A Sense of Time for Node.Js: Timeouts As a Cure for Event Handler Poisoning
A Sense of Time for Node.js: Timeouts as a Cure for Event Handler Poisoning Anonymous Abstract—The software development community has begun to new Denial of Service attack that can be used against EDA- adopt the Event-Driven Architecture (EDA) to provide scalable based services. Our Event Handler Poisoning attack exploits web services. Though the Event-Driven Architecture can offer the most important limited resource in the EDA: the Event better scalability than the One Thread Per Client Architecture, Handlers themselves. its use exposes service providers to a Denial of Service attack that we call Event Handler Poisoning (EHP). The source of the EDA’s scalability is also its Achilles’ heel. Multiplexing unrelated work onto the same thread re- This work is the first to define EHP attacks. After examining EHP vulnerabilities in the popular Node.js EDA framework and duces overhead, but it also moves the burden of time sharing open-source npm modules, we explore various solutions to EHP- out of the thread library or operating system and into the safety. For a practical defense against EHP attacks, we propose application itself. Where OTPCA-based services can rely on Node.cure, which defends a large class of Node.js applications preemptive multitasking to ensure that resources are shared against all known EHP attacks by making timeouts a first-class fairly, using the EDA requires the service to enforce its own member of the JavaScript language and the Node.js framework. cooperative multitasking [89]. An EHP attack identifies a way to defeat the cooperative multitasking used by an EDA-based Our evaluation shows that Node.cure is effective, broadly applicable, and offers strong security guarantees. -
Escuela T´Ecnica Superior De Ingeniería De
ESCUELA TECNICA´ SUPERIOR DE INGENIER´IA DE TELECOMUNICACION´ Ingenier´ıa de Telecomunicacion´ PROYECTO FIN DE CARRERA Learning Analytics, Escalabilidad, Mejora de la Experiencia de Usuario e Internacionalizacion´ de la Herramienta de E-Learning FLEQ Autor: Cristina Lavado Arevalo´ Tutor: Gregorio Robles Mart´ınez Curso Acad´emico2013/2014 Proyecto Fin de Carrera LEARNING ANALYTICS, ESCALABILIDAD, MEJORA DE LA EXPERIENCIA DE USUARIO E INTERNACIONALIZACION´ DE LA HERRAMIENTA DE E-LEARNING FLEQ Autor Cristina Lavado Arevalo´ Tutor Gregorio Robles Mart´ınez La defensa del presente Proyecto Fin de Carrera se realiz´oel d´ıa de de , siendo calificada por el siguiente tribunal: PRESIDENTE: SECRETARIO: VOCAL: y habiendo obtenido la siguiente calificaci´on: CALIFICACION:´ Fuenlabrada, a de de . Copyright c 2014 Cristina Lavado Ar´evalo Este documento se publica bajo la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 3.0 Espa~na http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/es (Ver Ap´endices) A mi familia Agradecimientos Esta´ es la culminaci´onde innumerables experiencias personales, que han dejado en m´ıgrandes recuerdos. Enumerar a todas las personas que me han apoyado e inspirado en estos ´ulti- mos a~noses una tarea incompleta y que voy a revelar ahora. Son muchas las personas a las que tengo que agradecer haber conseguido realizar el sue~node presentar este Proyecto y dar por finalizada una etapa de mi vida de la que me llevo grandes momentos. A los primeros que tengo que dar las gracias es a mi familia, y sobre todo a mis padres, sin vosotros no habr´ıa sido posible, gracias por vuestro apoyo incondicional y vuestro sacrificio durante estos a~nos.Sin la confianza que siempre hab´eisdepositado en m´ı,vuestra sinceridad y consejos este Proyecto y muchos logros personales no habr´ıanvisto la luz. -
Web Server Administration - the Easy Way
Chapter 1: What’s In Your Web Site? Get to Know Your Web Server Administrator Web server computer platforms UNIX Macintosh Windows NT Web server software NCSA, W3C/CERN, and Apache Windows NT WebSTAR and MacHTTPD How your Web site fits into the whole Administrator’s jargon and management tools Round Up the Usual Suspects! Inventory Web server resources Take stock of your Web site Lotsa docs (it’s not an M.D.’s convention) Graphics galore The supporting cast of applications… Marvelous miscellany “Organized Web site” is not an oxymoron Where does your site live? Picture your directory/file structure as a tree You can’t tell the territory without a map Understanding all the pieces and parts Using remote hyperlinks What’s the code situation like? Any imagemaps in the picture? Strategic Planning for Your Web Site Juggling large document collections Tooling Up for Web Site Management What tools do you really need? Tool search adventures Judge what you find How to get ’em when you find ’em Wheeling and dealing: what’s your budget? Chapter 2: Web Server Administration - the Easy Way Web Server Hosting Options Web server hosting services Local Web server hosts Web server space renters Web malls Your friendly neighborhood ISP Your organization’s LAN You!? How the Web Server Fits into the Whole The hardware: computer and telephone equipment Web server software and (briefly) how it works The basics Passing information into and out of the HTTP server Web Server Platforms UNIX and the Web Windows (NT and 95) are coming on strong The Macintosh alternative -
Event Handler Poisoning: Attacks and Defenses
Event Handler Poisoning: Attacks and Defenses Anonymous Anonymous [email protected] Abstract—The software development community has begun to are the first to examine the security implications of using the adopt the Event-Driven Architecture (EDA) to provide scalable EDA at a software architecture-level. In xIII we describe a web services. Though the Event-Driven Architecture can offer new Denial of Service attack that can be used against EDA- better scalability than the One Thread Per Client Architecture, based services. Our Event Handler Poisoning attack identifies its use exposes service providers to a Denial of Service attack the most important limited resource in the EDA: the Event that we call Event Handler Poisoning (EHP). With the rise in the Handlers themselves. use of the EDA may come a plague of EHP attacks threatening critical Internet services. The EDA’s scalability is also its Achilles’ heel. Multiplex- In this work we define EHP attacks, dividing them into ing unrelated work onto the same thread reduces overhead, two types, CPU-bound and I/O-bound. After examining EHP but it also moves the burden of time sharing out of the thread vulnerabilities in the popular Node.js EDA framework and open- library or operating system and into the application itself. source npm modules, we explore two representative EHP attacks Where OTPCA-based services can rely on the preemptive in detail: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) and I/O- multitasking promised by the underlying system to ensure based Denial of Service (IODoS). that resources are shared fairly, using the EDA requires the Using our Constant Worst-Case Execution Time (C-WCET) service to enforce its own cooperative multitasking [48]. -
Apache Web Server ______
Apache Web Server _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Original author(s) Robert McCool Developer(s) Apache Software Foundation Initial release 1995[1] 2.4.9 (March 17, 2014) [±] Stable release Development Active status Written in C, Forth, XML[2] Type Web server License Apache License 2.0 Website httpd.apache.org The Apache HTTP Server , commonly referred to as Apache , is a web server application notable for playing a key role in the initial growth of the World Wide Web.[3] Originally based on the NCSA HTTPd server, development of Apache began in early 1995 after work on the NCSA code stalled. Apache quickly overtook NCSA HTTPd as the dominant HTTP server, and has remained the most popular HTTP server in use since April 1996. In 2009, it became the first web server software to serve more than 100 million websites.[4] Apache is developed and maintained by an open community of developers under the auspices of the Apache Software Foundation. Most commonly used on a Unix-like system,[5] the software is available for a wide variety of operating systems, including Unix, FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris, Novell NetWare, OS X, Microsoft Windows, OS/2, TPF, OpenVMS and eComStation. Released under the Apache License, Apache is open-source software. As of June 2013, Apache was estimated to serve 54.2% of all active websites and 53.3% of the top servers across all domains.[6][7][8][9][10] 1 Apache Web Server _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Name According to the FAQ in the Apache project website, the name Apache was chosen out of respect to the Native American tribe Apache and its superior skills in warfare and strategy. -
Enhancing Quality of Service Metrics for High Fan-In Node.Js Applications by Optimising the Network Stack
DEGREE PROJECT, IN COMPUTER SCIENCE , SECOND LEVEL LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND 2015 Enhancing Quality of Service Metrics for High Fan-In Node.js Applications by Optimising the Network Stack LEVERAGING IX: THE DATAPLANE OPERATING SYSTEM FREDRIK PETER LILKAER KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND COMMUNICATION (CSC) Enhancing Quality of Service Metrics for High Fan-in Node.js Applications by Optimising the Network Stack -Leveraging IX: The Dataplane Operating System FREDRIK PETER LILKAER DD221X, Master’s Thesis in Computer Science (30 ECTS credits) Degree Progr. in Computer Science and Engineering 300 credits Master Programme in Computer Science 120 credits Royal Institute of Technology year 2015 Supervisor at EPFL was Edouard Bugnion Supervisor at CSC wa s Carl-Henrik Ek Examiner wa s Johan Håstad Presented: 2015-10-01 Royal Institute of Technology School of Computer Science and Communication KTH CSC SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden URL: www.kth.se/csc Abstract This thesis investigates the feasibility of porting Node.js, a JavaScript web application framework and server, to IX, a data- plane operating system specifically developed to meet the needs of high performance microsecond-computing type of applications in a datacentre setting. We show that porting requires exten- sions to the IX kernel to support UDS polling, which we imple- ment. We develop a distributed load generator to benchmark the framework. The results show that running Node.js on IX improves throughput by up to 20.6%, latency by up to 5.23×, and tail latency by up to 5.68× compared to a Linux baseline. We show how server side request level reordering affect the la- tency distribution, predominantly in cases where the server is load saturated.