FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Report and Financial Statements
Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2018 Dimensional Funds ICVC Authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority No marketing notification has been submitted in Germany for the following Funds of Dimensional Funds ICVC: Global Short-Dated Bond Fund International Core Equity Fund International Value Fund United Kingdom Core Equity Fund United Kingdom Small Companies Fund United Kingdom Value Fund Accordingly, these Funds must not be publicly marketed in Germany. Table of Contents Dimensional Funds ICVC General Information* 2 Investment Objectives and Policies* 3 Authorised Corporate Directors’ Investment Report* 6 Incorporation and Share Capital* 10 The Funds 10 Fund Cross-Holdings 10 Authorised Status* 10 Regulatory Disclosure* 10 Potential Implications of Brexit* 10 Responsibilities of the Authorised Corporate Director 11 Responsibilities of the Depositary 11 Report of the Depositary to the Shareholders 11 Directors' Statement 11 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Shareholders of Dimensional Funds ICVC 12 The Annual Report and Financial Statements for each of the below sub-funds (the “Funds”); Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund Global Short-Dated Bond Fund International Core Equity Fund International Value Fund United Kingdom Core Equity Fund United Kingdom Small Companies Fund United Kingdom Value Fund are set out in the following order: Fund Information 14 Portfolio Statement* 31 Statement of Total Return 149 Statement of Change in Net Assets Attributable to Shareholders 149 Balance Sheet 150 Notes to the Financial Statements 151 Distribution Tables 168 Remuneration Disclosures (unaudited)* 177 Supplemental Information (unaudited) 178 * These collectively comprise the Authorised Corporate Directors’ (“ACD”) Report. Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. Annual Report and Financial Statements, 31 December 2018 1 Dimensional Funds ICVC General Information Authorised Corporate Director (the “ACD”): Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. -
Japanese Manufacturing Affiliates in Europe and Turkey
06-ORD 70H-002AA 7 Japanese Manufacturing Affiliates in Europe and Turkey - 2005 Survey - September 2006 Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) Preface The survey on “Japanese manufacturing affiliates in Europe and Turkey” has been conducted 22 times since the first survey in 1983*. The latest survey, carried out from January 2006 to February 2006 targeting 16 countries in Western Europe, 8 countries in Central and Eastern Europe, and Turkey, focused on business trends and future prospects in each country, procurement of materials, production, sales, and management problems, effects of EU environmental regulations, etc. The survey revealed that as of the end of 2005 there were a total of 1,008 Japanese manufacturing affiliates operating in the surveyed region --- 818 in Western Europe, 174 in Central and Eastern Europe, and 16 in Turkey. Of this total, 291 affiliates --- 284 in Western Europe, 6 in Central and Eastern Europe, and 1 in Turkey --- also operate R & D or design centers. Also, the number of Japanese affiliates who operate only R & D or design centers in the surveyed region (no manufacturing operations) totaled 129 affiliates --- 125 in Western Europe and 4 in Central and Eastern Europe. In this survey we put emphasis on the effects of EU environmental regulations on Japanese manufacturing affiliates. We would like to express our great appreciation to the affiliates concerned for their kind cooperation, which have enabled us over the years to constantly improve the survey and report on the results. We hope that the affiliates and those who are interested in business development in Europe and/or Turkey will find this report useful. -
List of Suppliers for the Fairphone 2 Understanding Our List of Suppliers
List of Suppliers for the Fairphone 2 Consumer electronics supply chains include layers of our supply chain. In addition to our several complex, often opaque tiers of first-tier assembly manufacturer, we have suppliers, ranging from first-tier assembly mapped all second-tier suppliers, and are manufacturers (direct suppliers) to second, progressively including third and fourth-tier third and sometimes even fourth-tier suppliers in our research. By uncovering all component manufacturers. Many electronics of the different players and manufacturing manufacturers only have insight into their locations in our smartphone supply chain, we direct suppliers and perhaps some second-tier can start engaging with suppliers, establishing component manufacturers. relationships and initiating programs for improvement. At Fairphone, we are working to gain an in-depth understanding of the complicated Understanding our List of Suppliers The list below includes all of the first, second Locations: Whenever possible, we have listed and third-tier suppliers that we know of to the (approximate) manufacturing location. If this date, and it is accurate to the best of our information was not available, we have provided the location of the company headquarters. knowledge at the time of publication. We will periodically update the information in this Categories: Suppliers are grouped by the type of document as we learn more. components they produce. Some suppliers may be mentioned more than once because they produce Here is a bit more information about how the different kinds of components, sometimes with list is arranged: different manufacturing locations. Tiers: Supplier tiers are calculated from the point of the final assembly. -
Phoenix Unit Trust Managers Manager's Interim Report Putm Bothwell Japan Tracker Fund
PHOENIX UNIT TRUST MANAGERS MANAGER’S INTERIM REPORT For the half year: 1 February 2016 to 31 July 2016 PUTM BOTHWELL JAPAN TRACKER FUND Contents Investment review 2-3 Portfolio of investments 4-51 Top ten purchases and sales 52 Statistical information 53-56 Statements of total return & change in net assets attributable to unitholders 57 Balance sheet 58 Distribution table 59 Corporate information 60-61 1 Investment review Dear Investor Performance Review Welcome to the PUTM Bothwell Japan Tracker Fund Over the review period, the PUTM Bothwell Japan interim report for the six months to 31 July 2016. Tracker Fund returned 17.59% (Source: HSBC, Gross of AMC, GBP, based upon the movement in the Cancellation Price for the six months to 31/07/16). This compares with its benchmark index return of 17.94% (Source: Datastream, FTSE World Japan Index until 04/03/14 and thereafter the Topix Index, Total Return in GBP terms for six months to 31/07/16). In the table below, you can see how the Fund performed against its benchmark index over the last five discrete one-year periods. Standardised Past Performance Jul 15-16 Jul 14-15 Jul 13-14 Jul 12-13 Jul 11-12 % growth % growth % growth % growth % growth PUTM Bothwell Japan Tracker Fund 15.15 17.3 -0.6 29.8 -8.2 Benchmark Index 15.66 17.7 -0.4 30.2 -8.1 Source: Fund performance is HSBC, Gross of AMC, GBP, based upon the movement in the Cancellation Price to 31 July for each year. Benchmark Index performance is Datastream, FTSE World Japan Index until 04/03/14 and thereafter the Topix Index, Total Return in GBP terms to 31 July for each year. -
FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped
2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) Alteogen 0.19 KOREA Hyundai Engineering & Construction 0.35 KOREA NH Investment & Securities 0.14 KOREA AmoreG 0.15 KOREA Hyundai Glovis 0.32 KOREA NHN 0.07 KOREA Amorepacific Corp 0.65 KOREA Hyundai Heavy Industries 0.29 KOREA Nong Shim 0.08 KOREA Amorepacific Pfd. 0.08 KOREA Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance 0.13 KOREA OCI 0.17 KOREA BGF Retail 0.09 KOREA Hyundai Merchant Marine 1.02 KOREA Orion 0.21 KOREA BNK Financial Group 0.18 KOREA Hyundai Mipo Dockyard 0.15 KOREA Ottogi 0.06 KOREA Celltrion Healthcare 0.68 KOREA Hyundai Mobis 1.53 KOREA Paradise 0.07 KOREA Celltrion Inc 2.29 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2.74 KOREA Posco 1.85 KOREA Celltrion Pharm 0.24 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2nd Pfd. 0.33 KOREA Posco Chemical 0.32 KOREA Cheil Worldwide 0.14 KOREA Hyundai Motor Pfd. 0.21 KOREA Posco International 0.09 KOREA CJ Cheiljedang 0.3 KOREA Hyundai Steel 0.33 KOREA S1 Corporation 0.13 KOREA CJ CheilJedang Pfd. 0.02 KOREA Hyundai Wia 0.13 KOREA Samsung Biologics 0.92 KOREA CJ Corp 0.11 KOREA Industrial Bank of Korea 0.22 KOREA Samsung C&T 0.94 KOREA CJ ENM 0.15 KOREA Kakao 3.65 KOREA Samsung Card 0.08 KOREA CJ Logistics 0.12 KOREA Kangwon Land 0.23 KOREA Samsung Electro-Mechanics 0.81 KOREA Coway 0.36 KOREA KB Financial Group 1.78 KOREA Samsung Electronics 25.36 KOREA Daewoo Engineering & Construction 0.12 KOREA KCC Corp 0.12 KOREA Samsung Electronics Pfd. -
Organization Sector Report Title Publication Year Report Type
GRI Reports List 2012(Japan) last updated: April 2013 Organization Sector Report Title Publication Year Report type Application Level Status Adeka Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Advantest Technology Hardware Corporate Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced AEON Retailers Environmental and Social Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Aeon Retailers Environmental & Social Initiatives 2012 2012 Non - GRI Aishin Seiki Equipment Aisin Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Ajinomoto Food and Beverage Products Sustainability Report 2012 2012 Non - GRI All Nippon Airways Coompany Limited Aviation Annual Report 2012 Non - GRI Asahi Glass Company Chemicals AGC Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Asahi Group Holdings Food and Beverage Products CSR Communication Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Asahi Kasei Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Astellas Pharma Health Care Products Annual Report 2012 2012 GRI - G3.1 B Self-declared azbil Conglomerates azbil Report 2012 2012 Non - GRI Benesse Holdings, Inc. Other Benesse Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Bridgestone Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Brother Technology Hardware CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Canon Technology Hardware Sustainability Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Casio Consumer Durables Sustainability Report 2012 2012 GRI - G3.1 B Self-declared Chiyoda Corporation Construction CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Chubu Electric Power Energy Annual Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Citizen Holdings Conglomerates CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced -
Socially Conscious Australian Equity Holdings
Socially Conscious Australian Equity Holdings As at 30 June 2021 Country of Company domicile Weight COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIA 10.56% CSL LTD AUSTRALIA 8.46% AUST AND NZ BANKING GROUP AUSTRALIA 5.68% NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD AUSTRALIA 5.32% WESTPAC BANKING CORP AUSTRALIA 5.08% TELSTRA CORP LTD AUSTRALIA 3.31% WOOLWORTHS GROUP LTD AUSTRALIA 2.93% FORTESCUE METALS GROUP LTD AUSTRALIA 2.80% TRANSURBAN GROUP AUSTRALIA 2.55% GOODMAN GROUP AUSTRALIA 2.34% WESFARMERS LTD AUSTRALIA 2.29% BRAMBLES LTD AUSTRALIA 1.85% COLES GROUP LTD AUSTRALIA 1.80% SUNCORP GROUP LTD AUSTRALIA 1.62% MACQUARIE GROUP LTD AUSTRALIA 1.54% JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES IRELAND 1.51% NEWCREST MINING LTD AUSTRALIA 1.45% SONIC HEALTHCARE LTD AUSTRALIA 1.44% MIRVAC GROUP AUSTRALIA 1.43% MAGELLAN FINANCIAL GROUP LTD AUSTRALIA 1.13% STOCKLAND AUSTRALIA 1.11% DEXUS AUSTRALIA 1.11% COMPUTERSHARE LTD AUSTRALIA 1.09% AMCOR PLC AUSTRALIA 1.02% ILUKA RESOURCES LTD AUSTRALIA 1.01% XERO LTD NEW ZEALAND 0.97% WISETECH GLOBAL LTD AUSTRALIA 0.92% SEEK LTD AUSTRALIA 0.88% SYDNEY AIRPORT AUSTRALIA 0.83% NINE ENTERTAINMENT CO HOLDINGS LIMITED AUSTRALIA 0.82% EAGERS AUTOMOTIVE LTD AUSTRALIA 0.82% RELIANCE WORLDWIDE CORP LTD UNITED STATES 0.80% SANDFIRE RESOURCES LTD AUSTRALIA 0.79% AFTERPAY LTD AUSTRALIA 0.79% CHARTER HALL GROUP AUSTRALIA 0.79% SCENTRE GROUP AUSTRALIA 0.79% ORORA LTD AUSTRALIA 0.75% ANSELL LTD AUSTRALIA 0.75% OZ MINERALS LTD AUSTRALIA 0.74% IGO LTD AUSTRALIA 0.71% GPT GROUP AUSTRALIA 0.69% Issued by Aware Super Pty Ltd (ABN 11 118 202 672, AFSL 293340) the trustee of Aware Super (ABN 53 226 460 365). -
Wilmington Funds Holdings Template DRAFT
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund as of 5/31/2021 (Portfolio composition is subject to change) ISSUER NAME % OF ASSETS USD/CAD FWD 20210616 00050 3.16% DREYFUS GOVT CASH MGMT-I 2.91% MORGAN STANLEY FUTURE USD SECURED - TOTAL EQUITY 2.81% USD/EUR FWD 20210616 00050 1.69% MICROSOFT CORP 1.62% USD/GBP FWD 20210616 49 1.40% USD/JPY FWD 20210616 00050 1.34% APPLE INC 1.25% AMAZON.COM INC 1.20% ALPHABET INC 1.03% CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY CO 0.99% AIA GROUP LTD 0.98% NOVARTIS AG 0.98% TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 0.91% INTACT FINANCIAL CORP 0.91% CHARLES SCHWAB CORP/THE 0.91% FACEBOOK INC 0.84% FORTIVE CORP 0.81% BRENNTAG SE 0.77% COPART INC 0.75% CONSTELLATION SOFTWARE INC/CANADA 0.70% UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.70% AXA SA 0.63% FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES INC 0.63% BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 0.62% PFIZER INC 0.62% TOTAL SE 0.61% MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC 0.61% VINCI SA 0.60% COMPASS GROUP PLC 0.60% KDDI CORP 0.60% BAE SYSTEMS PLC 0.57% MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 0.57% NATIONAL GRID PLC 0.56% PUBLIC STORAGE 0.56% NVR INC 0.53% AMERICAN TOWER CORP 0.53% MEDTRONIC PLC 0.51% PROGRESSIVE CORP/THE 0.50% DANAHER CORP 0.50% MARKEL CORP 0.49% JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.48% BUREAU VERITAS SA 0.48% NESTLE SA 0.47% MARSH & MCLENNAN COS INC 0.46% ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 0.45% LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 0.45% ALPHABET INC 0.44% MERCK & CO INC 0.43% CINTAS CORP 0.42% EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON INC 0.41% MCDONALD'S CORP 0.41% RIO TINTO PLC 0.41% IDEX CORP 0.40% DIAGEO PLC 0.40% LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC 0.40% PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC/THE 0.40% ACCENTURE -
DEV-Informationdisplay
0 I Chapter News • (See also Page 13} Information JAPAN CHAPTER wins the Editor's Prize this month for B. A second meeting chaired by Chuji Sujuki, SID content and humor. On July 23 this chapter had two Chapter Committeeman was attended by 14 SID meetings at the Sharp Corporation offices in Tokyo as members and 15 non-members. This meeting was follows: primarily for yo ung engineers and research scientists. A. Meeting chaired by lwao Ohishi, Chai rman of SID Topics discussed included: Display Japan Chapter and Masao Sugimoto, Vice-Chairman, BCEE Group, IEEE Tokyo Chapter, attended by 29 SID * Topics i n author interviews at the 1981 SID members and 29 non-members. The program was as symposium j The Official Journal of t he Society For Information D isplay NOVEM BER, 1981 follows: * Sinclair's f lat CRTs * Application of POPs v * Cost down of Flat Panel Displays 1. Report on the 1981 SID International Symposium * Kanji Displays and Human Fa ctors General Review Koh-ichi Miyaji, * Penetration CRTs Shibaura Institute of Technology 1 .2 Session VII Human Factors * Eurodisplay '81 and Japan Display '83 Hideo Kusaka, NHK Broadcasting Science Research Labs., Tokyo 1.3 Session X Color CATs Humor: Ryuichi Kaneko, Japan Chapter Secretary, sent CATs your Editor a package of material which arrived just too Osamu Takeuchi, Sony Corp., Tokyo 1.4 Session IX Passive Displays I late for our September/ October issue. But don't ever let Noboru Kaneko, Daini Seikosha anyone tell you that our Japanese friends lack a sense of Co., Ltd., Tokyo humor. -
The Mineral Industry of Japan in 1998
THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF JAPAN By John C. Wu Japan’s reserves of limestone, pyrophyllite, and silica are important role in supplying the ferrous and nonferrous metals, quite large. Japan has considerable reserves of coal and iodine, fabricated metal products, and industrial mineral products to but its reserves of natural gas and crude petroleum are very the construction and manufacturing industries of China, small. As a result of exploration conducted in the past 5 years including Hong Kong, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, by the Metal Mining Agency of Japan (MMAJ), a Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan. semigovernment agency under the Ministry of International For the first time since the end of World War II, the Japanese Trade and Industry (MITI), reserves of gold, lead, and zinc had economy went into a severe recession in 1998 after 5 years of been extended (Metal Mining Agency of Japan, 1998a), but slow growth in the 1990’s. According to the Economic Japan’s reserves of ferrous and nonferrous minerals are small. Planning Agency and MITI, Japan’s economy, as measured by Japan relied on imports to meet more than 95% of its raw GDP in 1990 constant yen, contracted 2.8% in 1998. material requirements for energy, ferrous metals, and Restructuring in the financial, manufacturing, and other sectors nonferrous metals for its mineral-processing and mineral- had resulted in a substantial increase in unemployment, which related manufacturing sectors. Japan also relied on imports to reached a record rate of 4.1% in 1998. The depressed real meet between 10% and 25% of its requirements for refined estate and stock markets had caused the major banks to carry a nonferrous metal products, industrial mineral products, and heavy load of bad loans, with limited funds available for refined petroleum products. -
Deloitte Australia Cleantech (DACT) Index
Deloitte Australia CleanTech (DACT) Index July 2020 1 Contents Executive summary 03 The CleanTech Sector in Australia 04 Market wrap – 30 June 2020 05 Focus Company: Orocobre 06 Positive contributions to the DACT 07 Negative contributions to the DACT 08 Sub-Indices Performance 09 DACT20 Index 10 Constituent Companies 11 Compilation of the DACT 14 Contact us 15 July 2020, Issue 6 Deloitte Australia CleanTech Index Published quarterly by Deloitte Brought to you by: John O’Brien Partner | Financial Advisory CleanTech Specialist Tel: +61 8 8407 7168 e-mail: [email protected] 2 Deloitte Australia CleanTech Index Executive Summary Welcome to the Deloitte Australia CleanTech (DACT) Index Quarterly Performance Report for 30 June 2020. The Deloitte Australia retail, restaurants and pubs to CleanTech (DACT) Index is a reopen. quarterly review of cleantech stocks listed in Australia. It is compiled Over the longer term, the from publicly available information cleantech sectors track record for provided by the Australian outperforming the market, the Securities Exchange (ASX). The DACT index should continue to DACT Index is based on the market recover from this market capitalisation weighted share price disruption. performance of listed companies that operate across a number of The 5-year performance of the defined sub-sectors. The impact of DACT still boasts a 53.4% gain, dividends and capital returns are compared to 14.7% gain for the excluded from the Index, which ASX200. currently comprises 91 companies. To provide an analysis of the DACT In the last quarter of FY20, the Index, a number of sub-indices Australian market bounced back have been developed. -
TECHNICAL REPORT – PATENT ANALYSIS Enhancing Productivity in the Indian Paper and Pulp Sector
TECHNICAL REPORT – PATENT ANALYSIS Enhancing Productivity in the Indian Paper and Pulp Sector 2018 TABLE OF contEnts ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 1 INTRODUCTION 13 2 OVERVIEW OF THE PULP AND PAPER SECTOR 15 2.1. Status of the Indian Paper Industry 15 2.2. Overview of the Pulp and Papermaking Process 20 2.3. Patenting in the Paper and Pulp Industry: A Historical Perspective 22 2.4. Environmental Impact of the Pulp and Paper Industry 25 3 METHODOLOGY 27 3.1. Search Strategy 27 4 ANALYSIS OF PATENT DOCUMENTS USING GPI 31 4.1. Papermaking; Production of Cellulose (IPC or CPC class D21) 31 4.2. Analysis of Patenting Activity in Different Technology Areas using GPI 38 5 ANALYSIS OF THE INDIAN PATENT SCENARIO WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THIS REPORT 81 5.1. Analysis of Patents Filed in India 81 6 CONCLUDING REMARKS 91 REFERENCES 93 ANNEXURE 94 Annexure 1. Technologies related to paper manufacturing 94 Annexure 2. Sustainable/green technologies related to pulp and paper sector 119 Annexure 3. Emerging Technology Areas 127 List OF FIGURES Figure 2.1: Geographical Spread of Figure 4.11: (d) Applicant vs. Date of Indian Paper Mills .................................16 Priority Graph: Paper-Making Machines Figure 2.2: Share of Different Segments and Methods ........................................42 in Total Paper Production .......................19 Figure 4.11: (e) Applicant vs. Date of Figure 2.3: Variety Wise Production of Priority Graph: Calendars and Accessories ..43 Paper from Different Raw Materials ........19 Figure 4.11: (f) Applicant vs. Date of Figure 2.4: Different Varieties of Paper Priority Graph: Pulp or Paper Comprising Made from Various Raw Materials ..........19 Synthetic Cellulose or Non-Cellulose Fibres ..43 Figure 2.5: Diagram of a Process Block Figure 4.11: (g) Applicant vs.