ID LAND PTY LTD WOODS ROAD, TRUGANINA

EXPERT WITNESS STATEMENT

1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Draft prepared by Andrea Murphy 15 November 2013

Suite A3, 8 Rogers Street Port Melbourne VIC 3207 Suite 4, 46-50 Old Princes Highway Beaconsfield VIC 3807 PO Box 776 Beaconsfield VIC 3807

2

CONTENTS PAGE 1 PERSONAL DETAILS

2 QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE

3 AREA OF EXPERTISE & STATEMENT OF EXPERTISE TO MAKE THE REPORT

4 INSTRUCTIONS AND SCOPE OF REPORT

5 SUMMARY OF OPINION

6 DECLARATION

3

1 PERSONAL DETAILS

My name is Andrea Murphy, and I am the Director and Principal archaeologist and heritage advisor at Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd trading as Archaeology at Tardis, heritage advisors and archaeologists. The head office is situated at Suite 4 46-50 Old Princes Highway, Beaconsfield 3807, Victoria.

2 QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE

I have a degree in Archaeology majoring in Australian Archaeology (Aboriginal) completed in 1984, and a Masters of Arts (Prelim) in Historic (non-Aboriginal) Archaeology, completed in 1991.

I am a member and office bearer of the following affiliated bodies:

° Australian Society of Historic Archaeology (State Delegate) ° Australian Association of Consulting Archaeologists (Victorian Chairperson, Full Member, National Executive Committee Member) ° Australian Anthropological and Archaeological Society ° National Trust (VIC) ° Royal Victorian Historical Society ° Australia ICOMOS Full International Member ° Heritage Advisor Status (Aboriginal Affairs Victoria)

I have been a practising archaeologist and heritage advisor since 1988, having worked for a number of private sector and government agencies in the capacity of an archaeologist until establishing Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd in 1994. Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd, which now trades as Archaeology at Tardis (AAT) is a leading consulting firm with 15 senior staff, and 10 supporting and sub-contracting personal. Over this 23 year period I have authored or co-authored over 1000 projects which have been produced for a wide variety of clients (see appendix 1). Tardis has been the recipient of several awards including Winner 2003 UNESCO Asia Pacific Heritage Conservation Award.

4

My expertise therefore is pre-contact and post contact Aboriginal archaeology and historic archaeology. AAT undertakes a considerable proportion of historic archaeological assessments in Victoria, including major excavations which require extensive post excavation analysis and reporting. My main role as Director and principal advisor is project management and supervision of numerous concurrent projects but remain heavily involved with field survey, excavations, background research, post excavation analysis, stakeholder consultation, production of technical reports and resolving the wide range of management issues relevant to Aboriginal and or historic heritage places and sites by devising appropriate management recommendations. I regularly appear at Tribunal hearings and before planning panels as an Expert Witness in the area of Aboriginal and historic heritage.

5

3 AREA OF EXPERTISE & STATEMENT OF EXPERTISE TO MAKE THIS REPORT

I have done extensive work in historic cultural heritage management. Throughout this statement historic heritage refers to any site/place which has a non-Aboriginal origin. This expertise includes the historic heritage of Melbourne, Gippsland, Murray River, Victorian coast, forested uplands of the Dividing Range and the volcanic plains of the Western District of Victoria. I have prepared historic heritage reports for private developers, wind farm projects, local government and infrastructure organisations which have required the management of many forms of historic heritage including dry stone walls. I have identified and recorded a large range of the various forms which dry stone walls occur, including a large number in the Wyndham Shire. Assessing the significance of a site (in accordance with The Burra Charter Criteria) is an integral part of my role in heritage management for all projects.

4 INSTRUCTIONS AND SCOPE OF REPORT

In September 2013, I was contacted in writing by Norton Rose Fulbright Australia on behalf of ID Land Pty Ltd to review and assess documents relevant to heritage matters affecting Woods Road in relation to proposed amendments to the Wyndham Planning Scheme comprising the Truganina Precinct Structure Plan 1090 and the Wyndham North Development Contributions Plan. These are to be considered in a Planning Panel Hearing. AAT was engaged to:

1. Review the letter of engagement, enclosed documents and the exhibited C175 and C177 (as relevant to my area of expertise); 2. confer with instructing solicitors and counsel where necessary; 3. prepare an expert report considering heritage matters; and 4. appear at the Panel Hearing of this matter for the purpose of presenting an expert opinion concerning heritage matters.

6

Specifically, ID Land Pty Ltd has objected to the retention of a section of dry stone wall on the northern boundary of the property as shown in the Truganina PSP in Plan 3.

I have not addressed Aboriginal cultural heritage in this expert witness statement. ID Land Pty Ltd has separately commissioned AAT to prepare an Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP).

I have reviewed and assessed the documents provided and consider the following as relevant to my area of expertise:

1. Historic Heritage Assessment: Tarneit Precinct Structure Plan Area 90 (Context, April 2012 (Context Report)); 2. Wyndham North Heritage Strategy (Heritage Alliance, May 2012 (Heritage Alliance Report)); and 3. Truganina Precinct Structure Plan 1090 (GAA, July 2013 (Truganina PSP)).

In October 2013, I was contacted in writing by Norton Rose Fulbright Australia to review additional documents (where relevant to my area of expertise) comprising:

1. Summary Unresolved Issues Version 1.1 (Metropolitan Planning Authority, October 2013); 2. Strategy for Managing Growth in Wyndham (Wyndham City Council, June 2013); and 3. 2040 Wyndham Social Infrastructure Planning Framework (Wyndham City Council, Updated 2012).

I have also reviewed a historic heritage statement (HHS) which was authored by Dr Tom Rymer (dated 20 August 2013). The scope was to prepare a statement on the heritage values of the existing dry stone wall at Woods Road, Truganina. The advice was based on interpretation of the Heritage Act 1995 , a search of the Victorian Heritage Database and a site visit. The site visit was conducted on Tuesday 20 August 2013 by Dr Tom Rymer.

7

In preparing this evidence, I have also had regard to Built to Last: An historical and archaeological survey of Dry Stone Walls in Melbourne’s Western Region (Gary Vines 1990).

The scope of my instructions was to consider the heritage values of the dry stone wall specifically on the subject land. I am aware that no specific historic or archaeological study into the dry stone walls located within the ID land has been undertaken.

I have not reviewed or assessed in any detail the numerous site historic cultural heritage assessments conducted in the Municipality that relate to dry stone walls. This is properly a review to be conducted in any comprehensive assessment of dry stone walls in the Municipality.

5 SUMMARY OF OPINION

Context Report

This is the report prepared by the GAA which I understand aims to provide guidance for the retention and possible removal of historic heritage. The Context Report contains the following relevant information for the purposes of this statement:

1. Its purpose is to provide guidance regarding the retention and possible removal of known heritage (p 1). 2. The Panel Report for the Wyndham Planning Scheme Amendment C86 in 2009 (Panel Report) acknowledges that the dry stone walls were a significant element in the western plains landscape and should be protected. 3. The Panel Report recommended that Council immediately undertake a study to identify significant pre 1940 dry stone walls within the

8

municipality (p ix-x). The Context Report (p vii) notes that there was no published study that they identified. 4. The Panel Report also recommended that the Wyndham Planning Scheme be amended to include a Schedule to Clause 52.37 to protect dry stone walls constructed prior to 1940. The Context Report (p vii) notes that this was subsequently done. 5. The Context Report states that there are many dry stone walls located within the PSP area and that some define the road reserves, property boundaries and domestic farm fences (p ix). 6. Land within 50m of the centre of Skeleton Creek is identified as an area of high archaeological potential and a ‘clear cultural landscape’. The Context Report suggests that consideration be given to applying a Heritage Overlay or Significant Landscape Overlay (p xi-xii). 7. The study had a very limited timeframe and budget. This meant limited time for fieldwork, historical research and assessment of known heritage places (p 1).

I make the following observations about the Context Report:

1. Dry stone walls are known to exist in the Truganina PSP area. It is not clear why the Context Report did not specifically identify, record, assess for significance or recommended for preservation dry stone walls in the Truganina PSP area. 2. No key recommendations were made regarding dry stone walls. I have assumed this was outside the scope of the project or due to the lack of time for fieldwork and that a study to identify significant pre 1940 dry stone walls was previously recommended in the Panel Report. Recommendations should have been made regarding the dry stone walls or the necessity for a comprehensive study of them. 3. To my knowledge there is still no study that has comprehensively identified significance pre 1940 dry stone walls in the municipality. It is not clear why the Context Report did not specifically recommend that this study should be undertaken.

9

4. Land within 50m of Skeleton Creek north and south of Dohertys Road is described as a ‘clear cultural landscape’. It has been identified as an area of archaeological potential. This is reasonable south of Dohertys Road taking into consideration identified cultural heritage (Itinerants Cave, HO29, HO30, HO119, Leakes Road house ruin). However, currently there is no evidence to support the assessment of the area north of Dohertys Road as being a ‘clear cultural landscape’ because it does not appear to be based on any known cultural heritage evidence or assessment in this area. 5. In my opinion the limited timeframe and budget of the project has meant that there was limited time for fieldwork, historical research and assessment of known heritage places. This may explain why dry stone walls were not specifically included in the assessment.

Heritage Alliance Report

I understand this report will provide the basis for the Council’s dry stone wall strategy. The Heritage Alliance Report contains the following relevant information for the purpose of this statement:

1. The Heritage Alliance Report “provides a re-assessment of the heritage places, identified in earlier heritage studies and subsequently included in the Wyndham Planning Scheme and within the Wyndham North growth area. The report includes recommendations for the further management requirements of all heritage places currently identified in the Wyndham North area, and incorporating Precinct Structure Plans (PSP) 1088- 1091”(p 28). 2. “An assessment was also made of all visible dry stone walls although this was not comprehensive and was not part of the original brief of work” (p 28). 3. “A detailed assessment of Dry Stone Walls throughout the PSP areas was not part of the original brief for this project but a visual assessment was subsequently requested and this could only be conducted from the surrounding roadways, hence a number of walls which lie on the interior of properties were difficult to assess. Some properties were not accessible

10

and and (sic) assessment of features on the land was not able to be conducted.” (p 29). 4. “A general review and ‘drive by’ mapping has been made of the dry stone walls that could be seen in the area. This is not a dry stone wall strategy.” (p 30) 5. With regard to the methodology: “The Wyndham North Heritage Strategy has reviewed the four PSP areas for sites that are: … Dry stone walls (although this was belatedly added to the brief)” (p 31). 6. “A brief survey was taken of all dry stone walls visible from the public realm or on accessed sites. All roadside walls have been noted on a separate map” (p 33). 7. “It is recommended that a thorough assessment of all dry stone walls in the City of Wyndham should be undertaken. This has already been a recommendation of the 2009 C86 (heritage) planning panel. Further assessment should accurately locate dry stone walls, using GPS, assess the type and condition of walling and consider possible conservation actions … A number of dry stone walls were identified in the areas of PSP1088- 1091 and are listed at Appendix D. This is not a comprehensive survey and is recognised as an incomplete list. Other dry stone walls may exist on properties that we have not had access to and cannot be viewed from the public realm.” (p 37) 8. Detailed recommendations for dry stone walls are presented in Section 7.2 and it is suggested that: a. “After further assessment develop a map which identifies those [dry stone walls] of historic significance that will be added to the planning scheme.” (p 40); and b. “Undertake a municipality wide comprehensive survey of all dry stone walls.” (p 41). 9. The Heritage Alliance reports of dry stone walls uses the following criteria: location and approximate length, height, original purpose, whether walls were part of a larger complex, and whether the walls were within a landscape area, especially if within a proposed public open space area (p 121).

11

10. The Heritage Alliance Report acknowledges that: “No comparative analysis for dry stone walls has occurred as part of this study. A brief investigation of the general condition of walls has occurred but a detailed investigation has not been undertaken” (p 121). 11. The Heritage Alliance Report states that: “It is recommended that a further comprehensive survey be undertaken for this area given its rich and significant context for dry stone walls … It is recommended that minimal modification is to occur to the following walls: Skeleton Creek / Dry Creek; all dry stone walls located along the banks of these creeks” (p 122). 12. The Heritage Alliance Report noted dry stone walls along Woods Road north of Dohertys Road (p 125). Walls along the eastern side were considered to be in better condition than those along the western side where the dry stone walls have been demolished along long sections (including on ID Land Pty Ltd land parcels). 13. The report also notes the dry stone wall along Skeleton Creek north from the junction of Dry Creek and north of Dohertys Road (p 125). This dry stone wall appears to have been identified by Vines (p 23).

I make the following observations about the Heritage Alliance Report:

1. The assessment of dry stone walls was not part of the original brief. This has meant that the identification, recording and assessment of significance of dry stone walls could only be done from public land and in a cursory manner. The Heritage Alliance report states that the assessment was not comprehensive and I agree. No evidence of any detailed recording of dry stone walls is found in the Heritage Alliance Report (eg recording sheets, individual dry stone wall records). The data for the assessment of significance for specific dry stone walls is not presented and therefore it is not clear why one individual dry stone wall is rated differently from another. 2. No comparative assessment of dry stone walls was conducted. Such a comparison would allow an assessment of how representative (common or rare) individual dry stone walls are in regard to other dry stone walls in the

12

municipality. This would assist in determining which dry stone walls are worthy of retention and management. 3. The Heritage Alliance Report repeatedly recommends that a comprehensive study of dry stone walls in the municipality should be undertaken. In my opinion the lack of a comprehensive study has constrained the assessment of the significance and management of dry stone walls in the Heritage Alliance Report. A comprehensive study would assist in determining how common or rare individual dry stone walls are and whether they should be retained. 4. The Heritage Alliance Report has not justified why the dry stone wall at Woods Road, Truganina (owned by ID Land Pty Ltd) should be retained. They have not provided any intrinsic or comparative evidence for their significance assessment. 5. It is not clear how they could have assessed the dry stone wall at Woods Road, Truganina, when they did not access the land. The section of dry stone wall to be retained extends approximately 600m westwards from Woods Road. It is unlikely they could properly observe and record the dry stone wall from the verge of Woods Road. 6. The Heritage Alliance Report has stated that it was not a dry stone wall strategy. In my opinion Wyndham City Council should conduct a comprehensive study of all dry stone walls in the municipality so that they can develop a transparent dry stone wall strategy.

Truganina PSP Report

The Truganina PSP presents a map showing sections of existing dry stone walls to be retained (Plan 1 Precinct Features; Plan 3 image, character, heritage & housing). One of these dry stone walls is situated on the northern boundary of Woods Road, Truganina (owned by ID Land Pty Ltd). Requirements 12 and 13 in the PSP directly relate to the section of dry stone wall shown on Plan 1 and Plan 3. Requirement 12 states “Dry stone walls shown on Plan 3 must be retained as part of any future development. Any other existing dry stone walls may be removed with the expressed consent of the Responsible Authority” (p13). Requirement 13 includes requirements for the retention of dry stone walls such

13

as placement of dry stone wall in open space or road reserve, repair and regular maintenance, etc.

Site Visit 20 August 2013

Senior AAT Project Archaeologist Dr Tom Rymer conducted a site visit at Woods Road, Truganina, on Tuesday 20 August 2013. I have visited the ID land project are previously and am familiar with its historic heritage. For the purposes of this Expert Witness Statement, Dr Tom Rymer took photographs presented below.

During the site visit the dry stone walls were mapped and photographed. The dry stone walls are found along the length of the northern and western boundary of the subject land. Approximately midway along the northern boundary is a small dry stone wall enclosure. This enclosure was in the northwest corner of the original eastern paddock. It is likely that the western boundary of this paddock was a dry stone wall that divided the subject land into western and eastern halves.

Summary Assessment of the Dry Stone Walls

Since initial construction, the dry stone wall may have been modified up to three or four times. These modifications have damaged the original fabric of the dry stone wall. Along with general neglect over many decades, the dry stone wall is in poor condition.

Based on a small section of dry stone wall in the southwest of the subject land (Photo 1), it is possible that the original dry stone wall was constructed up to approximately 1m height with a row of cap stones and did not include a post and wire component. Subsequently, the dry stone wall was likely reduced in height to approximately 60cm tall with split posts fixed into the wall to carry wire (Photo 2). At the stone enclosure these split posts have large rectangular holes indicative of post and rail fencing (Photos 3 & 4). With the deterioration of the split posts and wire, they were subsequently replaced with rounded wooden posts, star pickets and wire (Photo 5). This has resulted in the dry stone wall

14

being modified so that the well-constructed elements of the dry stone wall only survive to approximately two stone courses high in places. The remainder of the stones have been piled into place. It also appears that some terminal posts have been recently replaced (Photo 6).

Photo 1

Section of dry stone wall along the southwestern boundary of the subject land which indicates the original height of wall and lack of post and wire component

Photo 2

Old (possible original) split post and wire fence. Note the very poor condition of the dry stone wall. It is likely the original dry stone wall was dismantled to fix the posts into the stones.

15

Photo 3

Split post with rectangular hole for rail, note also subsequent star picket and wire post and poor condition of dry stone wall (view of terminal dry stone wall at enclosure)

Photo 4

Split post with rectangular hole for rail, note the poor condition of the dry stone wall forming the boundary of the enclosure

16

Photo 5

Star pickets with barbed wire

Photo 6

End of dry stone wall at Woods Road that is recommended to be retained. Note the recent replacement of terminal posts with treated pine, the poor condition of the dry stone wall & the older gate post with metal sheet capping.

Based on Burra Charter (The Burra Charter: The Australia Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance ) values which consider the historic, social, aesthetic and scientific values of a place; the dry stone wall was assessed as having local historical, low social, low aesthetic and low scientific significance. It also had no archaeological potential. Based on intrinsic scientific values, it is my opinion that there was no reason for the retention of the dry stone wall.

Conclusion

17

It is unclear why the section of dry stone wall in Plan 3 of the Truganina Precinct Structure Plan at Woods Road, Truganina, requires retention (Requirement 12) as opposed to other dry stone walls in the municipality. The reasons for my opinion are as follows:

1. If Wyndham City Council or other stakeholders want to retain the most significant dry stone walls in the Municipality on intrinsic values, or more generally, to retain a representative sample of dry stone walls if none have high significance; then a municipal wide dry stone wall assessment is required. This would facilitate the formulation of a dry stone wall strategy. The retention of any dry stone wall can then be determined based on comprehensive evidence and clearly formulated guidelines. 2. The Context Report has noted that Wyndham City Council has not prepared a dry stone wall assessment for the municipality. This should have been conducted before dry stone walls were nominated for mandatory retention. 3. The Heritage Alliance Report has recommended that a comprehensive assessment of dry stone walls be conducted in the Municipality. Again, this should have been conducted before dry stone walls are nominated for mandatory retention. 4. The section of dry stone wall at Woods Road, Truganina (owned by ID Land Pty Ltd) was not subject to detailed assessment by the Context Report or Heritage Alliance Report. 5. Based on intrinsic values, I have assessed the dry stone wall as having low scientific significance and I conclude that there is no scientific reason why it should be preserved.

6 DECLARATION

I have made all the inquiries that I believe are desirable and appropriate and that no matters of significance which I regard as relevant have to my knowledge been withheld from the Planning Panels Victoria.

18

Andrea Murphy

Signature:

Date:

Andrea Murphy Projects Manager/Director Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd

19

APPENDIX 1

REPORTS & PUBLICATIONS

Murphy, A

Murphy A, M 2013 VAHR 8020-0264 & VAHR 8020-0265, Millars Road, Pound Creek, Dowdell & T Rymer Salvage Excavation. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Bald Hill Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2013 VAHR 7622-0135 & 7622-0136 Mt Mercer Wind Farm Transmission Line Salvage Excavation. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Powercor Network Services Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2013 VAHR 7821-0619, Lot 2 3080 Point Nepean Road, Sorrento, Salvage Excavation. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Graeme Uthmeyer.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2013 . Approved CHMP 10515 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for RES Australia Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2013 Intersection Upgrade of Camperdown-Lismore Road & Lower Darlington Road, Lismore. Approved CHMP 12402 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Penshurst Wind Farm Powerline to Grid & Terminal Station, Gerrigerrup to Tarrone: Desktop Assessment Component for a Cultural Heritage Management Plan. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for RES Australia Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Subdivision of Land, 1505-1525 (Lot 2) Pound Road, Clyde North: Historic Cultural Heritage Assessment. HV Report No 4223. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for the Dennis Family Corporation on behalf of Pound Road Clyde Trust.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Subdivision of Land, 1505-1525 (Lot 2) Pound Road, Clyde North. Approved CHMP 12115 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Pound Road Clyde Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 VTS Expansion (Euroa to Benalla) YYNAC RAP Area Due Diligence. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Monarc Environmental Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 VTS Expansion (Wandong Pressure Limiter & Offtake to Euroa) TCAC RAP Area Due Diligence. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Monarc Environmental Pty Ltd.

20

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 132kV Transmission Line for Stockyard Hill Wind Farm at Glen Devon, 2306 Skipton road, Skipton. Approved CHMP 12305 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Stockyard Hill Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Subdivision of Land, 335 Grices Road, Clyde North. Approved CHMP 12096 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Moremac Property Group Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Stockyard Hill Wind Farm Terminal Station, Lower Darlington Road, Lismore. Approved CHMP 12081 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Stockyard Hill Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Northern Access, Buffalo-Waratah Road, Tarwin Lower. Approved CHMP 12011 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Bald Hills Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Burvilles Road, Armstrong Creek, Residential Subdivision, 282-400 Horseshoe Bend Road, Mount Duneed. Approved CHMP 12000 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for DFC (Armstrong Creek) Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 , Goulburn Valley Highway, Kerrisdale, Victoria. Approved CHMP 11919 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Cherry Tree Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Candowie Reservoir Upgrade Project, Grantville-Glen Alvie Road, Almurta. Approved CHMP 11799 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Westernport Water.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 1100 Pound Road, Clyde North, Subdivision of Land. Approved CHMP 11697 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Sam Mondous.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Geotechnical Investigations for the Proposed Toomuc Creek Retarding Basin, 125 Mulchay Road, Pakenham. Approved CHMP 11659 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for GHD Pty Ltd on behalf of Melbourne Water.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Marong Business Park: Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for the City of Greater Bendigo.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Horseshoe Bend Precinct Structure Plan: Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Integrated Development Pty Ltd.

21

Murphy A & T Rymer 2012 Horseshoe Bend Precinct Structure Plan, Armstrong Creek, Geelong: Historic Cultural Heritage Assessment. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for St Quentin Consulting on behalf of the Project Management Group for the Horseshoe Bend Land Owner Group.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Technology Park, University of Ballarat, University Drive, Mount Helen. Approved CHMP 11764 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Technology Park, University of Ballarat.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Victorian Desalination Transfer Pipeline Corridor Wonthaggi to Cranbourne: Salvage Excavations. A report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Thiess Degrémont Nacap.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 VAHR 7921-0886 Cascades on Clyde Salvage Excavation, Berwick- Cranbourne Road, Clyde North. ACHRIS Report 4394. Prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for GEO Developments Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Mortons Lane Wind Farm, Mortons Lane, Nareeb. Approved CHMP 11504 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Goldwind Australia Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Lexton Wind Farm, Beaufort – Lexton Road, Lexton. Approved CHMP 11052 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Origin Energy Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Lexton Wind Farm, Powerline to Grid & Terminal Station, Jones Road to Troy Road, Lexton. Approved CHMP 11053 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Origin Energy Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Botanic Ridge East, Residential Subdivision, Browns Road, Cranbourne South. Approved CHMP 11306 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Botanic Ridge Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Ararat Wind Farm Powerline to Grid. Approved CHMP 11442 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for RES Australia Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Subdivision of Land, 550 Craigieburn Road, Craigieburn. Approved CHMP 11635 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for Places Victoria.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Residential Subdivision, 121 Grices Road, Clyde North. Approved CHMP 11636 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis for Moremac Property Group Pty Ltd.

22

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Salt Creek Wind Farm. Approved CHMP 11863 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis Pty Ltd for NewEn Australia Pty Ltd

Murphy A & T Rymer 2011 Subdivision of Land, 342-368 Hammond Road, Dandenong South. Approved CHMP 11872 prepared by Archaeology At Tardis for Castricum Brothers Pty Ltd.

Kennedy S & A 2011 Residential and Retail Subdivision, 1095 Pound Road and 181 Murphy, Grices Road, Clyde North. Approved CHMP 10857 prepared by T Rymer Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Australand Holdings Limited.

Green B & A Murphy, 2011 Lakes Tyers Aboriginal Trust Sewerage Scheme, Lake Tyers T Rymer Aboriginal Trust to Toorloo Arm Reservoir, Lake Tyers. Approved CHMP 10677 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for East Gippsland Water.

Green B & A Murphy, 2011 Cascades on Clyde, Clyde North: Salvage Excavations. ACHRIS T Rymer Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for GeoProperty Group Pty Ltd.

A Murphy, 2010 Bass Highway Stage 7 – Woolmer Road to Phillip Island Road, T Rymer, P Kershaw Anderson. Approved CHMP 10071 for VicRoads.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2010 Bald Hills Wind Farm, Bald Hills Road, Tarwin Lower. Approved CHMP 10611 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Bald Hills Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2010 Stockyard Hill Wind Farm Powerline to Grid, Stockyard Hill to Berrybank. Approved CHMP 10739 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Stockyard Hill Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2010 Bald Hills Wind Farm, Powerline to Grid, Cnr Koonwarra-Inverloch Rd & Bass Hwy, Leongatha South to Bald Hills Wind Farm, Tarwin Lower. Approved CHMP 10841 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Bald Hills Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2010 Edenbrook Residential Estate Ancillary Works (Utilities, Road, Bridge, Creek Works and Access Track Diversion) Henry Road to Cardinia Road, Pakenham. Approved CHMP 11042 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Devine Communities.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2010 Mount Mercer Wind Farm Powerline to Grid, Shelford-Mount Mercer Road, Mount Mercer to Unnamed Road Reserve off Murphys Road, Elaine. Approved CHMP 11132 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Mount Mercer Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

23

Murphy A & T 2010 Proposed Tarrone Power Station, Tarrone. Approved CHMP 11187 Rymer, prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for AGL Energy Limited. S Thomson

Murphy A & T Rymer 2009 Edenbrook Residential Estate, Henry Road, Pakenham. Salvage Excavations. ACHRIS Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Devine Communities.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2009 Proposed Municipal Park, Anglers Drive, Legends Hill. Approved CHMP 10914 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Australand Holdings Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2009 Residential Subdivision, Lots 2 & 3 Rix Road, Officer. Approved CHMP 10939 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for National Pacific Properties Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2009 Edenbrook Residential Estate, Henry Road, Pakenham: Salvage Excavation. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Devine Communities.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2009 Hunt Club Residential Housing Estate, 202S Cameron Street, Cranbourne East. Approved CHMP 10659 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Hunt Club Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2009 Hunt Club Residential Subdivision, Mayfield Precinct, Mayfield Road, Cranbourne East. Approved CHMP 10865 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Hunt Club Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2009 Botanic Ridge Residential Estate (East), Cranbourne South. Approved CHMP 10441 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Botanic Ridge Developments Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2009 Stockyard Hill Wind Farm, Stockyard Hill. Approved CHMP 10530 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Stockyard Hill Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2009 Stockyard Hill Wind Farm Terminal Station, 565-805 Collins Lane, Berrybank. Approved CHMP 10740 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Stockyard Hill Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 Botanic Ridge Estate, Cranbourne South: Salvage Excavations AAV7921-0755, 0759 & 0875. ACHRIS Report 4145. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Leederville Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T 2008 Sewer Rising Main, Officer South. Approved CHMP 10045 prepared Rymer by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for South East Water Ltd.

24

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 Edenbrook Residential Estate, Henry Road, Pakenham. Approved CHMP 10161 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Devine Communities.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 Portsea Golf Club. Approved CHMP 10270 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Portsea Golf Club.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 M3 Industrial Estate, 95-117 Bayliss Road, Lyndhurst. Approved CHMP 10333 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Devcon Group Pty Ltd on behalf of Pellicano Investments Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 M3 Estate, Bayliss Road, Lyndhurst: Cultural Heritage Assessment. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Devcon Group Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 45-125 Glasscocks Road, Lyndhurst. Approved CHMP 10422 prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Goodman International Limited.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 Aylmer Road, Lyndhurst: Cultural Heritage Assessment. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 Bass Highway Duplication, Stage 7, Woolmer Road to Phillip Island Road: Cultural Heritage Assessment. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for VicRoads.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 Exford Estate, Exford Road, Melton South: Desktop Cultural Heritage Assessment. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Stocklands Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 Innovation Park, Colemans Road & Dandenong-Frankston Road, Lyndhurst: Cultural Heritage Assessment. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Devcon Group Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2008 Cardinia Road Employment Precinct: Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Opportunities & Constraints. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Macroplan Australia.

Murphy A & S 2007 Pakenham Bypass Cardinia Creek Excavations. ACHRIS Report Thomson, 4052. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Abigroup T Rymer Contractors Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Bald Hill, Portland: Cultural Heritage Assessment. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Wannon Water.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Bass Highway House Site (H7921-0043), Bass: Subsurface Testing Investigation. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for VicRoads.

25

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Gippsland Water Factory: Subsurface Testing Investigation. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Parsons Brinckerhoff Pty Ltd on behalf of the Gippsland Water Factory.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Gippsland Water Factory: Cultural Heritage Assessment. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Gippsland Water.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Price’s Land, Heywood: Cultural Heritage Assessment. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for GHD Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Officer South Rising Main, Officer: Subsurface Testing Investigation. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for GHD Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Botanic Ridge Estate, Cranbourne South: Subsurface Testing. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Breese Pitt Dixon Pty Ltd on behalf of Leederville Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Bo Peep Wind Farm: Desktop Cultural Heritage Assessment. ACHRIS Report 3816. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Wind Power Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Wallan Railway Station: Cultural Heritage Assessment. ACHRIS Report 3911. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Ltd on behalf of the Department of Infrastructure.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Officer South Rising Main, Officer: Cultural Heritage Assessment. ACHRIS Report 3919. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for GHD Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Lot 1 Henry Road, Pakenham: Subsurface Testing Investigation. ACHRIS Report 3971. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for KLM Spatial Pty Ltd on behalf of Henry Rd Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Brookford Estate, 545 Berwick-Cranbourne Road, Clyde North: Subsurface Testing Investigation. ACHRIS Report 4012. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for MSF Diversified Group.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Proposed Amenities Block, Chinese Gardens, Walhalla: Subsurface Testing Investigation. ACHRIS Report 4066. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Walhalla Crown Reserves Board of Management Inc.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2007 Lot A Henry Road, Pakenham: Subsurface Testing Investigation. ACHRIS Report 4080. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Taylors Development Strategists.

26

Murphy A & T Rymer 2006 Overnewton Anglican College, Keilor: Subsurface Testing Investigation. ACHRIS Report 3483. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for PH Group Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & L 2006 Southern Cross Aged Care Facility, 800 South Gippsland Highway, Amorosi, Lynbrook: Subsurface Testing Program. ACHRIS Report 3641. T Rymer Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Montlaur Project Services on behalf of Southern Aged Care Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & J Porter, 2006 Botanic Ridge Estate, Cranbourne South: Archaeological T Rymer, S Thomson, Subsurface Testing Investigation. ACHRIS Report 3764. Prepared C Kaskadanis, M by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Breese Pitt Dixon Pty Ltd on behalf Barker of Leederville Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2006 Glentara Estate , 325 Settlement Road, Drouin: Subsurface Testing Investigation. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Taylors Development Strategists Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2006 Glenelg Shire: Desktop Cultural Heritage Study. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Macroplan Australia.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2006 Gippsland Water Factory: Desktop Cultural Heritage Assessment. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Gippsland Water.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2006 Brookford Estate , 545 Berwick-Cranbourne Road, Clyde North: Subsurface Testing Investigation. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Villa World Limited.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2006 245 Copelands Road, Warragul: Subsurface Testing Investigation. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2006 Heritage Victoria Inventory H8021-0025, The former Wright House – Cardinia Lakes Estate, Pakenham: Test Excavation. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Peet & Co Limited.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2006 Highfield , 800 Berwick-Cranbourne Rd, Clyde North: Subsurface Testing Investigation. ACHRIS Report 3760. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for VicRoads.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2006 Proposed Lexton Wind Farm: Desktop Cultural Heritage Assessment. ACHRIS Report 3775. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Lexton Wind Farm Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T 2006 Settlers Run Estate, Cranbourne South: Archaeological Subsurface Rymer, Testing Investigation. ACHRIS Report 3487. Prepared by Tardis J Porter, M Barker Enterprises Pty Ltd for Medallist Projects Pty Ltd.

27

Murphy A & T Rymer 2005 Proposed School Site, Pakenham: Subsurface Testing Investigation. Prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Golder Associates Pty Ltd on behalf of the Department of Education. ACHRIS Report 3288.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2005 26 Pluto Drive, Venus Bay: Subsurface Testing Investigation. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for AAV.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2005 Albert & Copelands Roads Residential Development, Warragul: Subsurface Testing Investigation. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Ross & Worth Pty Ltd.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2005 Burwood Highway, Third Lane Widening (Hartingtons Rd to Stud Rd): Subsurface Testing Investigation. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for VicRoads

Murphy A & T Rymer 2005 Dromana-Bittern and Coolart Roads Intersection, Bittern: Cultural Heritage Assessment. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for VicRoads.

Murphy A & T Rymer 2005 Wattle Tree Road, Bunyip: Subsurface Testing Investigation. Report prepared by Tardis Enterprises Pty Ltd for Bosco Jonson Pty Ltd.

28