DOCSLIB.ORG

Processual SEMOMAP : an Application and Evaluation of the Accident Investigation Model in Passenger Ship Accidents Yogender Singh World Maritime University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Processual SEMOMAP : an Application and Evaluation of the Accident Investigation Model in Passenger Ship Accidents Yogender Singh World Maritime University World Maritime University The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University World Maritime University Dissertations Dissertations 2014 Processual SEMOMAP : an application and evaluation of the accident investigation model in passenger ship accidents Yogender Singh World Maritime University Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations Part of the Emergency and Disaster Management Commons Recommended Citation Singh, Yogender, "Processual SEMOMAP : an application and evaluation of the accident investigation model in passenger ship accidents" (2014). World Maritime University Dissertations. 477. http://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/477 This Dissertation is brought to you courtesy of Maritime Commons. Open Access items may be downloaded for non-commercial, fair use academic purposes. No items may be hosted on another server or web site without express written permission from the World Maritime University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WORLD MARITIME UNIVERSITY Malmö, Sweden PROCESSUAL SEMOMAP: An application and evaluation of the accident investigation model in passenger ship accidents By YOGENDER SINGH India A dissertation submitted to the World Maritime University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In MARITIME AFFAIRS (MARITIME SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATION) 2014 Copyright Yogender Singh, 2014 i DECLARATION I certify that all the material in this dissertation that is not my own work has been identifies, and that no material is included for which a degree has previously been conferred on me. The contents of this dissertation reflect my own personal views, and are not necessarily endorsed by the University. (Signature): ………………………………… (Date): .……………………………..…. Supervised by: Dr. Jens-Uwe Schröder-Hinrichs World Maritime University Assessor: Institution/organisation: Co-assessor: Institution/organisation: ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS At the very outset, I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Jens-Uwe Schröder- Hinrichs for his guidance and support that enabled me to successfully undertake my dissertation. I am grateful for his mentoring and encouragement that helped me to accomplish my research project. His vision, time and effort in supervising me are highly appreciated. I am also grateful to Raza Mehdi of the MaRiSa research group in particular, for his support at each stage of the project. He ensured that I had the necessary input and tools to keep the project moving ahead. I would like to thank the faculty at the World Maritime University who contributed to my learning and development over the course of the year. I am thankful to the staff of the World Maritime University, particularly the library staff for their support in procuring literature for my dissertation. I am thankful to the World Maritime University for the facilities made available to me that made it possible for me to complete my dissertation. Several individuals have contributed to the success of this dissertation. I wholeheartedly thank them all and acknowledge that I alone and responsible for any shortcomings of the dissertation. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my family for their support and encouragement. iii ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: Processual SEMOMAP: An application and evaluation of the accident investigation model in passenger ship accidents Degree: MSc This dissertation is an exploratory application and evaluation of the SEquential MOdel of the Maritime Accident Process (SEMOMAP) accident investigation model. SEMOMAP is uniquely positioned in the academic literature by virtue of its focus on the accident process. The dissertation aims to reveal insights into why some unfolding processes help the system to achieve a safe operative state, while others lead to a mitigated or total loss. Fifteen publicly available accident investigation reports from Maritime Administrations and investigating bodies are analysed utilising the SEMOMAP. The accident investigation reports are coded with the help of two taxonomies – Human Factors Analysis and Classification Systems (HFACS) and a taxonomy inspired by the Technique for the Retrospective and Predictive Analysis of Cognitive Errors (TRACEr). These taxonomies complement the SEMOMAP and provide a comprehensive perspective to accident investigation. The fifteen reports selected for analysis are of passenger vessel accidents that have taken place after the introduction of the International Safety Management (ISM) code in 1998 presuming the existence of a functional Safety Management System (SMS) ashore and on-board to ensure compliance with the code, including compliance with the Standards of Training, Certification and Watch Keeping (STCW). The accident reports are examined and the analysis helps to evaluate the SEMOMAP model and its performance. The analysis subjects the model to rigorous analytic evaluation. The purpose of the dissertation is twofold – on the one hand are the results of the analysis obtained after applying the model and on the other is the evaluation of the model itself, highlighting its strengths, weaknesses and unique contribution. The results are collated and discussed in the penultimate chapter (number 5); conclusions are drawn and recommendations are made in the final chapter 6. The dissertation argues that SEMOMAP with its complementary HFACS and TRACEr inspired taxonomies contributes to an enhanced and comprehensive understanding of the accident processes. The insights from applying the model make a valuable input for system resilience. KEYWORDS: SEMOMAP, Accident investigation models, HFACS, TRACEr, IMO casualty investigation iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Declaration……………………………………………………………………ii Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………..iii Abstract………………………………………………………………………iv Table of Contents…………………………………………………………..v-vi List of Tables………………………………………………………….……..vii List of Figures……………………………………………………………....viii List of Abbreviations…………………………………………………………ix 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………1-9 1.1 Background……………………………………………………..1-7 1.2 Aim, purpose and motivation for the dissertation……………....7-8 1.3 Structure of the dissertation……………………………………..8-9 2 Accident Causation Models – a Literature Review………………10-19 2.1 Sequential, epidemiological and systemic models…………...11-15 2.2 Evaluation of sequential, epidemiological and systemic models: advantages and disadvantages ………………………………..16-17 2.3 Maritime specific models……………………………………….17 2.4 Taxonomy for coding data……………………………………...18 2.5 Conclusion…………………………………………………..18-19 3 Research Methodology…………………………………………...20-35 v 3.1 Research methodology and sample selection………………….20-21 3.2 SEMOMAP……………………………………………………21-26 3.3 SEMOMAP taxonomy………………………………………...26-34 3.4 Conclusions……………………………………………………….35 4 Analysis of Accident Investigation Reports…………………….........36-83 4.1 SEMOMAP solved case study example……………………....36-44 4.2 Dissertation results…………………………………………….45-73 4.3 Overview of the results of all 3 categories – flooding, grounding and fire……………………………………………..74-83 4.4 Summary.………………………………………………………....83 5 Reflection on Results……………………………………………..84-90 5.1 Reflection on SEMOMAP…………………………………....84-85 5.2 Reflection on Results and Research Questions………………86-90 5.3 Summary……………………………………………………........90 6 Conclusions………………………………………………………91-92 7 Appendices………………………………………………………93-153 Appendix 1 Detail list of accident investigation reports……93-100 Appendix 2 SEMOMAP code book……………………….101-153 8 References……………………………………………………...154-157 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Subjects affected by influencing factors (applicable to phase 0)………………26 Table 2: SEMOMAP Taxonomy phase 0; factors leading to the dangerous situation; adapted HFACS……………………………………………………...27 Table 3: ‘Risk of’ incident; taxonomy table 1.1 Applicable to phase 1……………….. .28 Table 4: Breakdown of accident investigation reports analyzed………………………..36 Table 5: Monarch of the Seas ‘phase 0’ HFACS………………….……………..……...38 Table 6: Monarch of the Seas ‘phase 1’ coding (SEMOMAP taxonomy table 1.1)….…39 Table 7: Monarch of the Seas ‘phase 1’ coding (SEMOMAP taxonomy table 1.2, 1.3)..39 Table 8: Monarch of the Seas ‘phase 2’ coding (SEMOMAP taxonomy table 2.1)….…40 Table 9: Monarch of the Seas ‘phase 2’ coding (SEMOMAP taxonomy table 2.2, 2.3)..41 Table 10: Monarch of the Seas ‘phase 3’ coding (SEMOMAP taxonomy table 3.2, 3.3)…….........................................................................................................42-43 Table 11: List of accident investigation reports analyzed……………………………….45 Table 12: List of accident investigation reports analyzed……………………………….46 Table 13: Flooding accident category ‘phase 0’ HFACS overview ……………..……...47 Table 14: Flooding accident category ‘phase 1’ overview (level L2B)…….…………...49 Table 15: Grounding accident category ‘phase 0’ HFACS operator overview……..…...51 Table 16: Grounding accident category ‘phase 0’ HFACS equipment overview…..…...52 Table 17: Fire accident category ‘phase 0’ HFACS operator overview…………......64-65 Table 18: Fire accident category ‘phase 0’ HFACS equipment overview……..………..66 Table 19: All accident categories ‘phase 0’ (HFACS) overview………………….....74-75 Table 20: All accident categories ‘phase 0’ (HFACS) equipment overview………...77-78 Table 21: All accident categories, all phases, level 3-4 and 4-5 evaluation………….79-80 Table 22: All accident categories, all phases, level 3-4 and 4-5 summary………………81 Table 23: Timelines: all accident categories across all phases………………………......82 LIST
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Engineering, Instrumentation & Automation
    ENGINEERING, INSTRUMENTATION & AUTOMATION Instrumentation Calibration Automation Field Laboratory Maintenance Commissioning Projects Supply Office: ( PORTUGAL ) Rua Trabalhadores do Mar, n.º 16, 2º A 2900-650 Setúbal Tel.: +351 265 546 053 Fax.: +351 265 092 403 E-mail: [email protected] Mission Statement AMBIDETECTOR – Engineering &Instrumentation, Ltd., is a company providing services in the area of instrumentation & automation, maintenance & repairs, calibration and certification of electronic equipments. The business model employed is based on the supply of high quality services not only as a means of satisfying our customers but as well as with the vision of achieving the recognition on the world market as a commercially competitive company. In addition we give emphasis on environmental health and safety practices. Safety & Quality standards bear testimony of our commitment towards maintaining service excellence. INDEX TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. WHO IS AMBIDETECTOR ENG. & INST. LTD? 2. COMPANY MANAGEMENT 3. CORE BUSINESS 4. SERVICES SUPPLY 5. QUALITY ASSURANCE 6. MAKERS 7. COSTUMERS 1. Who is Ambidetector Eng. & Inst. Ltd? AMBIDETECTOR - Engineering & Instrumentation, Ltd. Is an innovative and ISO quality assured company in the area of instrumentation, calibration, automation, maintenance, repair and supply founded with the belief that customers deserve a permanent reliable source of advanced services with high performance according to their needs. With headquarters in Setubal City near the shipyard of Lisnave, Portugal, the AMBIDETECTOR – Engineering & Instrumentation, Ltd., is nowadays supported by technicians and engineers with expertise and background in the areas of electronics, mechanics, instrumentation, control, automation and environmental engineering with more than 20 years of experience. Page 3 2. Company Management The goal and management of our company is based on automation engineering as well as industrial control and instrumentation through the area of maintenance, calibration and installation of electronic equipments for control.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Off-Gassing from Wood Pellets a Canadian Perspective
    February 26, 2010 Staffan Melin Research Director Review of Off-gassing from Wood Pellets A Canadian Perspective The first time the off-gassing from pellets was observed was probably on May 9, 2002 when the ocean vessel MV Weaver Arrow loaded in Vancouver with wood pellets was discharging pellets in Rotterdam and one person was killed and two other people were severely injured as a result of exposure to carbon-monoxide when entering one of the cargo holds. Delta Research Corporation (DRC) in Canada immediately drafted the first warning and guideline (Shipper Cargo Information Sheet - SCIS) in accordance with the IMO regulations to inform on-board crews as well as dock workers in ocean ports about the nature of pellets and the potential risks involved. In June of 2002 the accident was announced by the Canadian delegation at the World Pellet Conference 2002 in Stockholm. Within another month a draft text for a classification of pellets as Material Hazardous in Bulk (MHB) was submitted by DRC to federal Department of Transport Canada and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) for introduction of wood pellets as a commodity in the IMO Bulk Code regulations for ocean transportation. Correspondence was also sent to the Swedish Maritime Safety Inspectorate in August 2002 to gain support for the introduction of the new code for pellets. IMO approved the introduction of pellets in the Bulk Code in 2004 and it became part of the updated version of the BC Code Handbook in December 2004 effective early 2005. From that time and onwards all ocean shipments of pellets from Canada were documented with reference to the new BC Code and the SCIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Safety Aspects of Solid Biomass Storage, Transportation and Feeding
    This publication focuses on the health and safety issues of the supply chain of solid Health and Safety Aspects biofuels with the objective to highlight commonly used mitigation methodologies of Solid Biomass Storage, to promote a better working environment when dealing with solid biofuels. It has been compiled as a joint effort by experts active in Transportation and Feeding Tasks 32, 36, 37 and 40 of the IEA Bioenergy Agreement, with their own specifi c fi elds of expertise. Only through this cooperation, it was possible to touch upon the full range of issues in one publication that one may come across when developing projects in which solid biomass fuels are produced, traded or used. The properties of a biomass material and the intended use determine how the material should be safely transported and stored. Self- heating, off-gassing and dust explosions are signifi cant challenges for the industry that have already resulted in signifi cant losses of capital investments and even tragic loss of life. Likewise, exposure to biologically active material, such as moulds and spores may form a serious hazard for the health of workers involved. With the growth of the bioenergy sector, it is important not only that opportunities for bioenergy are implemented in an effi cient and economic manner, but also safely. Produced by IEA Bioenergy Task 32, 36, 37 and 40 May 2013 I HEALTH AND SAFETY ASPECTS OF SOLID BIOMASS STORAGE, TRANSPORTATION AND FEEDING Report prepared by Jaap Koppejan, Procede Biomass BV, The Netherlands Anders Lönnermark, SP Technical
    [Show full text]
  • An Update on Biomass Handling
    THE WOLFSON CENTRE for Bulk Solids Handling Technology STORAGE, HANDLING AND FLOW OF BIOMASS MATERIALS Update of experience Mike Bradley Rob Berry 0000 Background Several substantial major projects have come on stream in the last 2 years Much has been learned – or confirmed about what we expected! Mostly focusing on pellets The Wolfson Centre for Bulk Solids Handling Technology Overview Projects Dust Flow behaviour Fire Explosion and other safety hazards Ash handling The Wolfson Centre for Bulk Solids Handling Technology Problems Successes Dust Transfer point design Self-heating and fire Large storage silos Pellet quality Integrated means for dust control Asphyxiation/intoxication Integrated means for fire Flat stores and front loaders control The Wolfson Centre for Bulk Solids Handling Technology Dust Has proved to be the most persistent and difficult problem to combat Even on well designed plants! Dust levels can be high due to segregation and degradation Even if clean pellets delivered! Dust emission highly variable Between shipments Through a shipment Key dust hazards: Health Explosion risk Mess The Wolfson Centre for Bulk Solids Handling Technology Inhalation of Biomass Dust More mobile than coal dust Stays suspended better than coal dust Much greater health danger than coal dust Danger of “Farmer’s Lung” (Alveolitis) Common in those handling biomass in agriculture Can stimulate allergic reaction Long term exposure can be debilitating Reducing dust emission Mainly at transfer points Covers required
    [Show full text]
  • Ethanol Bc Wood Pellet Association of Canada
    RESEARCH ON OFF-GASSING AND SELF-HEATING IN WOOD PELLETS DURING BULK STORAGE Prepared for ETHANOL BC Prepared by Staffan Melin Research Director WOOD PELLET ASSOCIATION OF CANADA _____________________________________________ ______________________ November 11, 2011 1 TABLE OF CONTENT Page 1. Executive Summary …………………………………………………………4 2. Introduction ………………………………….….……… …………………………….5 3. Off-gassing from Biomass ………….……………………………………………….6 4. Permeability of Pellets in Bulk ……………………………….…………………. 9 5. Thermal Conductivity of Pellets in Bulk …………………………………………11 6. Self-heating of Pellets in Bulk ……… …………………………………………13 7. Experimental determination of Temperature Increases Rate and Heat Front Velocity in Large Storage facilities ……………………………………………………..…… 14 8. ISO Standards Development …..……………………………………………………15 9. Summary and Conclusions ...……………………………………………………….. 18 Bibliography ..………………………………………………………………………… 20 2 Foreword Wood Pellet Association of Canada (WPAC) wishes to thank Ethanol BC for funding part of the research regarding off-gassing and self-heating in wood pellets during storage in bulk as reported in this document. WPAC in close collaboration with UBC Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering continues to build on the track record well known around the world as leading the research to mitigate the inherent safety and health risk associated with production and handling of wood pellets. The funding has been very helpful in supporting the research to better understand the mechanism of off-gassing and self-heating, both of which are major safety and health concern for our industry. The previous contribution by BC Ethanol was also very helpful to prepare our industry for the challenge to fill the shortage of fibre due to the many saw mill closures. Many of our pellet mills have now mastered the art of using a blend of feedstock such as sawdust, planer shavings, bark, harvest residue and even hog and still end up with an acceptable quality pellet.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Paper for the Great Lakes Commission Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Ballast Water Workshop Abstract
    8 November 2016 Page 1 of 30 Briefing Paper for the Great Lakes Commission Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Ballast Water Workshop November 16-17, 2016 Westin Book Cadillac Detroit1 Abstract This briefing paper provides background material to participants in a Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Ballast Water Workshop. The paper summarizes biological efficacy testing and certification of Ballast Water Management Systems (BWMSs) for use in the U.S. and Canada. The BWMS regulatory testing framework defines freshwater as comprising a range of conditions from low salt (<1PSU) to pure “sweet“ water like that in the Great Lakes. The BWMS certification testing framework seeks to show likely performance to the IMO/USCG standard in the field through up front testing on land and on ships in a range of water qualities and climate conditions. This testing does not define an operational window, however, just performance under a set of known, relatively challenging conditions. Ultimately, the ship owner remains liable for BWMS actual performance to the standard in the field under the entire range of possible challenge conditions. Most certification testing organizations meet the minimum required challenge conditions in their tests through natural or artificial means. These tests may or may not be predictive depending upon extent to which the tests adhere to quality assurance and quality control measures, and the extent to which the minimum challenge conditions provided reflect actual conditions in harbors globally. No BWMS have yet received USCG Certification, but many have IMO approvals. Most of the BWMS with approvals operate using up to two of a limited number of available BWMS treatment processes; these include variations of filtration, UV, electrolytic chlorination, and straight chlorination.
    [Show full text]
  • AUCTION CATALOGUE Lot No
    0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 0 AUCTION CATALOGUE Lot No. Description Reserve £ 1 ALBUMS, LEAVES & MIXED LOTS - S/book with sel'n of QE2 com'wlth m. inc 1977 12.50 SJ & other commems (550+) 2 S/book with sel'n of mainly u QE2 comm'wlth many commoner but no duplication (600+) 5.00 3 S/cards duplicated m/u KG6/QE2 comm'wlth KUT-Zambia modest condition (580+) 6.00 4 British Commonwealth, g-fu, over 60 countries (1000) 20.00 5 British Commonwealth, g-fu, over 60 countries (1000) 20.00 6 British Commonwealth, g-fu, over 60 countries (1000) 20.00 7 Western Europe commems, g-fu, 17 countries (1050) 25.00 8 CLUB BOOKS/APPRO SHEETS - Modern u Australia + Bahamas & Barbados inc. 15.00 QE2 top vals (SG 300 & 301 x 2 m) SVR £ 95 (309) 9 Appro sheets m/u Foreign all world c£40 SVR (387+2MS) 4.00 10 Appro sheets m/u Fr Cols & Fr area c£19 SVR (105) 1.50 11 Comm'wlth wide range, many earlier, later inc. Sierra Leone - Zimbabwe £47+ SVR (250+) 3.00 12 Appro sheets m/u Liechtenstein, Luxemburg, Switzerland & Italian area. Significant item Italy 35.00 concessional parcel post 75L CP850 umm c£180, £83+ SVR (86) 13 Appro sheets m/u Rhodesias inc. S Rhodesia u KG5 1/- perf 11½ £77 SVR (358) 10.00 14 NZ modern vfu ex fdcs ptsa£20 8.00 15 Br Com m/u & GB modern used (incl £10 cds).
    [Show full text]
  • LABOR LAW 2018 Cases
    LABOR LAW 2018 Cases LABOR LAW & SOCIAL LEGISLATION (2018 Cases) BY: DEAN’S CIRCLE 2019 CHERIE ANNE R. BUZON Officer-In-Charge ATTY. LEAN JEFF M. MAGSOMBOL Adviser ATTY. NILO T. DIVINA Dean 1 DEAN’S CIRCLE 2019 Abelende, Arra Jean S. De Dios, Cathlyn Audrey M. Pasigan, Lovely Joy E. Amosin, Airon Jeunne B. De Villa, Karen A. Rabino, Christian Jade R. Arzadon, Izzel Jarviz M. Dela Cruz, Ma. Clarissa M. Ramirez, Edrea Jean V. Aumentado, Reymundo Jr. P. Delos Santos, Ma. Alyanna DC. Ramos, Yurii C. Basbas, Lorane Angeli L. Depano, Machgielis Aaron R. Reyes, Alarice V. Bernabe, Sherissa Marisse Dioneda, Cianel Paulyn M. Reyes, Joanna Marie Bool, Leanne Claire M. Dumelod, Ricka Abigael R. Salvador, Kharina Mar V Buzon, Cherie Anne R. Fernandez, Ma. Czarina A. Samson, Kristel L. Buzon, Janice Belle T. Flores, April Anne T. Santos, Nikki Tricia R. Caburao, Caitlin P. Fronda, John Edward F. Sanvictores, Ruth Mae G. Camilon, Paola E. Gomez, Rose Anne Joy D. Sarmiento, Arianna Laine T. Caparas, Aya Dominique S. Guanga, Airei Kim P. Sarmiento, Ian Timothy R. Castillo, Arleigh Shayne A. Lacap, Hannah Camille N. Sim, Lance Lester Angelo Cruz, Karizza Kamille M. Magallon, Andrea D. Soriano, Manuel Joshua O. Cruz, Regina Annel S. Manalastas, Claudette Irene Sugay, Alexandra Nicole D. Cuevas, Juliane Erika C. Manguiat, Julie Ann C. Teves, Jan Matthew V. Curiba, Rochelle Nieva D. Opina, Louis- Mari R. Dabu, Annabelle O. Pacumio, Daverick Angelito E. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. General Provisions .............................................................................................................................. 4 II. Pre-Employment .................................................................................................................................. 6 III. Labor Standards .................................................................................................................................. 11 IV. Social Welfare Legislation ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • № 2/6 (131) 2020 Апрель-Ноябрь
    № 2/6 (131) 2020 апрель-ноябрь МОРЯКАМ НЕ ДОЛЖНО БЫТЬ ХУЖЕ, ЧЕМ ЛЮДЯМ, РАБОТАЮЩИМ НА БЕРЕГУ SEAFARERS SHOULD NOT FEEL WORSE THAN PEOPLE WORKING ASHORE ОТСУТСТВИЕ ОТНОШЕНИЙ СОЦИАЛЬНОГО ПАРТНЕРСТВА – ПРИЧИНА УБЫТОЧНОСТИ LACK OF SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP RELATIONS AS REASON FOR UNPROFITABLENESS РЕПАТРИАЦИЯ ВО ВРЕМЯ ПАНДЕМИИ: КАК РПСМ ПОМОГАЕТ МОРЯКАМ REPATRIATION DURING PANDEMIC: HOW SEAFARERS' UNION OF RUSSIA HELPS SEAFARERS НЕРЕ IN ISSUE 8 – 21 Фото на обложке: Marlow Navigation Crew Ship Management Marlow Navigation ЖУРНАЛ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ ПРОФСОЮЗОВ РАБОТНИКОВ МОРСКОГО ТРАНСПОРТА Редакционная коллегия Суоруков Ю. Ю., председатель Федерации профсозов работников морского транспорта ВРЕМЯ РПСМ председатель Российского профессионального соза моряков МОРЯКАМ Павлов И. Н., заместитель председателя РПСМ TIME OF SUR Бодня А. М., заместитель председателя РПСМ, председатель Совета Балтийской территориальной организации РПСМ НЕ ДОЛНО БЫТЬ Фиов С. А., координатор Международной федерации транспортников в России 4-5 Е ЧЕМ ЛЮДЯМ Сиротюк В. М., председатель С Российского профсоза работников морского транспорта РАБОТАЮИМ Козаренко В. В., председатель Российского профсоза докеров Кабанов В. А., председатель Межрегионального профсоза лоцманов НА БЕРЕГ Парев П. Ю., председатель ТПО «Мурманский траловый флот» To recognize seafarers Редакция as “key workers” Ирина Устюменко, главный редактор F Информация Ирина Устменко, Наталья Куликова, Маргарита Якубенко T F .sur.ru .bro.sp.ru .surpr.ru .stosur.ru 6-7 .novosur.ru .trosur.ru Дизайн, верстка: Юлия Назарова Р T При перепечатке опубликованных материалов ссылка на журнал I «Морской профсозный вестник» обязательна. Russia to Enable Crew Rotation Подписан в печать: 07.12.2020 Адрес редакции 198035, Санкт-Петербург, Двинская ул., д. 10, корп. 2, 7 эт. 34-37 Тел.: 718 63 82, 714 95 02, тел./факс: 718 63 82.
    [Show full text]
  • Vessel Capacity (MT) C/P Date Delivery Date C/P Owner
    Seatrek Trans Pte Ltd 16 Collyer Quay #07-02, Income At Raffles, Singapore 049318 Tel: +65 6227 7101 Fax: +65 65343009 Vessel Capacity (MT) C/P Date Delivery Date C/P Owner DARYA TAPTI 35,947 8/Nov/19 10/Nov/19 TAPTI SHIPPING LTD SOFIE VICTORY 63,350 1/Nov/19 4/Nov/19 ED&F MAN SHIPPING LTD. BANGLAR JOYJATRA 38,894 25/Oct/19 2/Nov/19 OCEANCHART LTD MANA 63,408 24/Oct/19 28/Oct/19 GUARDIAN NAVIGATION WORLDWIDE INC. CHARLENE 28,249 3/Oct/19 31/Oct/19 TAN BINH CO., LTD CHRISTOS THEO 56,838 21/Oct/19 24/Oct/19 THEOMARE HOLDING LTD VICTORIOUS 55,648 17/Oct/19 19/Oct/19 VICTORIOUS NAVIGATION S.A. SINOWAY VI 51,008 15/Oct/19 15/Oct/19 SINOWAY CHARTERING CO LTD NAZIA JAHAN 58,110 14/Oct/19 18/Oct/19 SR SHIPPING ASIA EMERALD I 58,018 8/Oct/19 12/Oct/19 TATA NYK SHIPPING PTE LTD SINGAPORE OCEAN TULIP 52,481 2/Oct/19 6/Oct/19 PACIFIC WORLD SHIPPING PTE LTD MV MAGNUM FORCE 53,630 19/Sep/19 19/Sep/19 ATRIUM MARITIME S.A OF MAJURO - MARSHALL ISLANDS MV OCEAN KNIGHT 56,785 21/Sep/19 22/Sep/19 AQUA MARINE S.A. MV ROJAREK NAREE 29,870 16/Sep/19 17/Sep/19 PRECIOUS JASMINES LIMITED MV ANTERO 56,892 12/Sep/19 17/Sep/19 ANTERO SHIPPING LP MV ANNA MARIA 55,664 10/Sep/19 11/Sep/19 SALAMANDER SHIPPING AND TRADING LIMITED MV SAGA DISCOVERY 46,618 5/Sep/19 6/Sep/19 SAGA WELCO AS MV BRAVE ROYAL 48,893 2/Sep/19 21/Sep/19 BSA SHIPPING LIMITED MV EJ OCEAN 46,570 28/Aug/19 7/Sep/19 HOPE YOUNG SHIPPING LTD MV PAN QUEEN 56,933 26/Aug/19 26/Aug/19 EASTERN OCEAN TRANSPORATION PTE.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2017 Number 23 - Volume 16
    December 2017 Number 23 - Volume 16 COLOFON DEADLINE NEXT EDITION: 01-11-2018 YOUR SUPPORT, BY SENDING YOUR ADVENTURES & PICTURES, IS WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR Het personeelsmagazine E-News verschijnt een The staff magazine E-News is published once a maal per jaar in een oplage van 450 en is een year with a circulation of 450 and is published by uitgave van de Harlingen rederijgroep JR Harlingen group of the shipping company JR Shipping BV. Shipping BV. JR Shipping BV JR Shipping BV T.a.v. redactie E-News Attn Editors E-News Postbus 3 PO Box 3 8860 AA Harlingen 8860 AA Harlingen Nederland The Netherlands T: +31 (0)517 431225 T: +31 (0) 517 431225 F: +31 (0)517 431720 F: +31 (0) 517 431720 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] I: www.jrshipping.com I: www.jrshipping.com JR Shipping BV aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid JR Shipping accepts no liability for any inaccura- bij eventuele onjuistheden. Aan de inhoud van cies. The contents of this publication are not le- deze uitgave kunnen zodoende geen rechten gally binding. worden ontleend. © Het auteursrecht op de in deze uitgave © The publisher reserves the right to the copy- verschenen artikelen wordt door de uitgever right of all articles published in this edition. Noth- voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag ing in this zonder toestemming van de uitgever worden publication may be reproduced or made public openbaar gemaakt of verveelvoudigd. without permission of the publisher. 2 FROM THE EDITORS ... We are happy to bring to you this edition of the E-news.
    [Show full text]