Comparative Connections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparative Connections Pacific Forum CSIS Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations edited by Carl Baker Brad Glosserman May – August 2012 Vol. 14, No.2 September 2012 http://csis.org/program/comparative-connections Pacific Forum CSIS Based in Honolulu, Hawaii, the Pacific Forum CSIS operates as the autonomous Asia- Pacific arm of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1975, the thrust of the Forum’s work is to help develop cooperative policies in the Asia- Pacific region through debate and analyses undertaken with the region’s leaders in the academic, government, and corporate arenas. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic/business, and oceans policy issues. It collaborates with a network of more than 30 research institutes around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating its projects’ findings and recommendations to opinion leaders, governments, and publics throughout the region. An international Board of Governors guides the Pacific Forum’s work. The Forum is funded by grants from foundations, corporations, individuals, and governments, the latter providing a small percentage of the forum’s annual budget. The Forum’s studies are objective and nonpartisan and it does not engage in classified or proprietary work. Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations Edited by Carl Baker and Brad Glosserman Volume 14, Number 2 May – August 2012 Honolulu, Hawaii September 2012 Comparative Connections A Triannual Electronic Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations Bilateral relationships in East Asia have long been important to regional peace and stability, but in the post-Cold War environment, these relationships have taken on a new strategic rationale as countries pursue multiple ties, beyond those with the US, to realize complex political, economic, and security interests. How one set of bilateral interests affects a country’s other key relations is becoming more fluid and complex, and at the same time is becoming more central to the region’s overall strategic compass. Comparative Connections, Pacific Forum’s triannual electronic journal on East Asian bilateral relations edited by Carl Baker and Brad Glosserman, with Ralph A. Cossa serving as senior editor, was created in response to this unique environment. Comparative Connections provides timely and insightful analyses on key bilateral relationships in the region, including those involving the US. We regularly cover key bilateral relationships that are critical for the region. While we recognize the importance of other states in the region, our intention is to keep the core of the e-journal to a manageable and readable length. Because our project cannot give full attention to each of the relationships in Asia, coverage of US-Southeast Asia and China-Southeast Asia countries consists of a summary of individual bilateral relationships, and may shift focus from country to country as events warrant. Other bilateral relationships may be tracked periodically (such as various bilateral relationships with Australia, India, and Russia) as events dictate. Our Occasional Analyses also periodically cover functional areas of interest. Our aim is to inform and interpret the significant issues driving political, economic, and security affairs of the US and East Asian relations by an ongoing analysis of events in each key bilateral relationship. The reports, written by a variety of experts in Asian affairs, focus on political/security developments, but economic issues are also addressed. Each essay is accompanied by a chronology of significant events occurring between the states in question during the four-month period. A regional overview section places bilateral relationships in a broader context of regional relations. By providing value-added interpretative analyses, as well as factual accounts of key events, the e-journal illuminates patterns in Asian bilateral relations that may appear as isolated events and better defines the impact bilateral relationships have upon one another and on regional security. Comparative Connections: A Triannual Electronic Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations (print ISSN 1930-5370, online E-ISSN 1930-5389) is published three times annually (January, May, and September) at 1003 Bishop Street, Suite 1150, Honolulu, HI 96813. Table of Contents Regional Overview:………………………………………………………………………………1 US Rebalances as Others Squabble by Ralph A. Cossa and Brad Glosserman, Pacific Forum CSIS The only good news over the past four months regarding Korean Peninsula denuclearization is the absence of any new really bad news. North Korea’s widely predicted third nuclear test or follow-on missile launch did not occur. The biggest multilateral surprise came from ASEAN, which concluded its annual ministerial meeting without issuing a chairman’s statement. The ministers at the ARF highlighted the need for broader multilateral cooperation throughout the region, including the South China Sea. Economic ministers launched the first East Asian Summit Economic Ministers Meeting and the inaugural ASEAN-US Business Summit. Meanwhile, Secretary of Defense Panetta provided reassurance that the US planned to remain engaged in the region, although this did little to deter others from harping about US “decline.” That refrain was accompanied by attempts to frame US policy as a response to the rise of China and a shifting balance of power in the region. Sigh! As part of the rebalancing, the US is attempting to broaden the scope of its foreign policy, not narrow it to fit a military lens. US-Japan Relations:…..………………………………………………………………………..17 Noda Marches on; Both Sides Distracted? by Michael J. Green, CSIS/Georgetown University, and Nicholas Szechenyi, CSIS Prime Minister Noda advanced a legislative package on tax and social security reform but faced stiff political headwinds in the form of a frustrated public and a jaded opposition steeling for an election. Japanese concerns over the safety of the MV-22 Osprey aircraft scheduled for deployment in Okinawa dominated the bilateral agenda – at least in the media – and tested the mettle of Japan’s widely-respected new defense minister. The two governments agreed to continue consultations on Japan’s interest in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) but political paralysis in Japan and presidential politics in the United States could complicate efforts to make progress in the near term. Two reports issued over the summer addressing US force posture strategy in the Asia-Pacific and the agenda for US-Japan alliance, respectively, focused on the future trajectory for the bilateral relationship. iii US-China Relations:……..……………………………………………………………………..25 Creating a New Type of Major Power Relations by Bonnie Glaser, CSIS/Pacific Forum and Brittany Billingsley, CSIS Over the summer, the US began to flesh out its rebalancing to Asia strategy, prompting Chinese concerns. The fourth round of the Strategic and Economic Dialogue (S&ED) was held in Beijing in May amid a kerfuffle over Chinese dissident lawyer Chen Guangcheng. Presidents Barack Obama and Hu Jintao held their 12th and likely final meeting in June on the margins of the G20 Summit in Los Cabos, Mexico. Bilateral friction intensified over developments in the South China Sea. US-China military interactions stepped up with a visit to the US by Chinese Defense Minister Liang Guanglie and a visit to China by Commander of US Pacific Command Samuel Locklear. The US-China Human Rights Dialogue was held in Washington in July. US-Korea Relations:...………………………………………………………………………….39 Challenges and Opportunities for the Next Administrations by Victor Cha, CSIS/Georgetown University and Ellen Kim, CSIS In May, US-Korea relations were marked by nervousness about a potential crisis with North Korea as telltale signs of activity at Punggye suggested preparations for a third nuclear test. Though a test did not occur, no one is confident that a crisis has been averted. In US-South Korea relations, differences over imports of Iran oil and US beef calmed down without causing a major hiccup. Meanwhile, a number of difficult bilateral negotiations remain unresolved. While there are signs of progress on the New Missile Guidelines (NMG), the civil nuclear talks remain deadlocked. Territorial and historical disputes between Japan and Korea have complicated and frustrated US desires to strengthen trilateral cooperation with South Korea and Japan. US-Southeast Asia Relations:…..……………………………………………………...............49 ASEAN Stumbles by Sheldon Simon, Arizona State University Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa salvaged ASEAN unity after its failure to issue a formal communiqué at its ministerial meeting due to disagreement over Chinese activities in the South China Sea. At the US-ASEAN Post-Ministerial Conference, Secretary of State Clinton reiterated US support for a peaceful settlement to the disputes and emphasized the importance of ASEAN-based institutions in that process. The US linked efforts to improve Philippine “maritime domain awareness” to Manila’s military development plans. Secretary of Defense Panetta also announced that the US would be adding naval visits to Vietnam. The US suspended many prohibitions against private investment in Myanmar, though human rights-based sanctions remain. At the Shangri-La Dialogue, Panetta outlined an ambitious plan for enhanced military partnerships with regional friends and allies, though how a reduced US military budget
Recommended publications
  • Growing Democracy in Japan: the Parliamentary Cabinet System Since 1868
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Kentucky University of Kentucky UKnowledge Asian Studies Race, Ethnicity, and Post-Colonial Studies 5-15-2014 Growing Democracy in Japan: The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868 Brian Woodall Georgia Institute of Technology Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Woodall, Brian, "Growing Democracy in Japan: The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868" (2014). Asian Studies. 4. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_asian_studies/4 Growing Democracy in Japan Growing Democracy in Japan The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868 Brian Woodall Due to variations in the technical specifications of different electronic reading devices, some elements of this ebook may not appear as they do in the print edition. Readers are encouraged to experiment with user settings for optimum results. Copyright © 2014 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Offices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Woodall, Brian.
    [Show full text]
  • Download E-Copy
    China Yearbook 2012 Editor Rukmani Gupta Copyright © Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, 2013 Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses No.1, Development Enclave, Rao Tula Ram Marg, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi - 110 010 Tel. (91-11) 2671-7983 Fax.(91-11) 2615 4191 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.idsa.in ISBN: 978-93-82512-03-5 First Published: October 2013 The covers shows delegates at the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, 2012. Photograph courtesy: Wikimedia Commons, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/18th_National_Congress_of_ the_Communist_Party_of_China Disclaimer: The views expressed in this Report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute or the Government of India. Published by: Magnum Books Pvt Ltd Registered Office: C-27-B, Gangotri Enclave Alaknanda, New Delhi-110 019 Tel.: +91-11-42143062, +91-9811097054 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.magnumbooks.org All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, sorted in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA). Contents Introduction 5 Section I: Internal Issues 9 1. Politics in China in 2012: Systemic Incrementalism and Beyond 11 Avinash Godbole 2. State and Society in 2012 – Protesting for Responsive Governance Structures 17 Rukmani Gupta 3. China’s Economy in 2012 – A Review 23 G. Balachandran 4. The Chinese Military in 2012 29 Mandip Singh Section II: External Relations 41 5. Sino-Indian Jostling in South Asia 43 Rup Narayan Das 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Way Forward: the Prospects for Political Leadership and The
    From Looking for Leadership: The Dilemma of Political Leadership in Japan, 2015 Japan’s Way Forward: 8 The Prospects for Political Leadership and the International Implications James GANNON and Ryo SAHASHI he success that Shinzo Abe had after his 2012 election in breaking Japan’s pattern of one-year premierships offered hope to some that a new era of effective political leadership was at hand for Tthe country. However, it appears that any respite from Japan’s “leadership deficit” will be temporary. As the authors of this volume argue, there are bound to be exceptions to the parade of short-lived prime ministers who struggle to advance their agendas—strong premiers such as Yasuhiro Nakasone, Junichiro Koizumi, and Abe are likely to emerge from time to time—but without further changes to the political system, powerful institutional factors will continue to make it difficult for prime ministers to exercise political leadership in a sustained and effective manner. Of course, Japan has never been renowned for having charismatic, strong political leaders. However, the challenges associated with political leadership are particularly worrying now because over the past quarter century, societal shifts, political reform, and voter expectations have elevated the profile of Japan’s prime minister, making the individual holding that post and the performance of that person increasingly conse- quential. Furthermore, in recent decades, the rise of summit diplomacy James Gannon is the executive director of the Japan Center for International Exchange (JCIE/USA), and Ryo Sahashi is an associate professor at Kanagawa University. 181 182 LOOKING FOR LEADERSHIP and advances in communications technology have expanded the diplo- matic role of heads of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Noda Marches On; Both Sides Distracted?
    Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations US-Japan Relations: Noda Marches On; Both Sides Distracted? Michael J. Green, CSIS/Georgetown University Nicholas Szechenyi, CSIS Prime Minister Noda advanced a legislative package on tax and social security reform but faced stiff political headwinds in the form of a frustrated public and a jaded opposition steeling for an election. Japanese concerns over the safety of the MV-22 Osprey aircraft scheduled for deployment in Okinawa dominated the bilateral agenda – at least in the media – and tested the mettle of Japan’s widely-respected new defense minister. The two governments agreed to continue consultations on Japan’s interest in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) but political paralysis in Japan and presidential politics in the United States could complicate efforts to make progress in the near term. Two reports issued over the summer addressing US force posture strategy in the Asia-Pacific and the agenda for US-Japan alliance, respectively, focused on the future trajectory for the bilateral relationship. Noda persists in the face of political uncertainty Prime Minister Noda Yoshihiko continued to press forward with a domestic agenda centered on a consumption tax increase to shore up Japan’s public finances, support for nuclear energy, and Japan’s participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade negotiations to spur economic growth. The lack of consensus on these issues in his ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and among the public kept his approval rating close to 30 percent and Noda reshuffled his Cabinet in June for the second time since he took office last fall in an attempt to turn the tide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Nature of Bureaucracy and Governing Structure in Japan
    Washington International Law Journal Volume 28 Number 2 4-1-2019 The Changing Nature of Bureaucracy and Governing Structure in Japan Mayu Terada Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, President/Executive Department Commons, and the Public Law and Legal Theory Commons Recommended Citation Mayu Terada, The Changing Nature of Bureaucracy and Governing Structure in Japan, 28 Wash. L. Rev. 431 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol28/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington International Law Journal by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Compilation © 2019 Washington International Law Journal Association THE CHANGING NATURE OF BUREAUCRACY AND GOVERNING STRUCTURE IN JAPAN Mayu Terada* Abstract: This paper analyzes and criticizes changes in the relationship between politics and the bureaucracy, in Japan up to the present from the viewpoint of administrative organizations and related public law system. Drastic changes in the legal system, or legal reform, may sometimes undermine the true intention of the policy and its implementation. Thus, bringing political leadership in administrative decision-making bodies cannot be easily concluded as better or worse than the complete separation of administration and government. To analyze this matter in
    [Show full text]
  • A Research on the Noda Cabinet's Diplomatic Strategy : Focusing on the North Korea Policy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hosei University Repository A Research on the Noda Cabinet's Diplomatic Strategy : Focusing on the North Korea Policy 著者 YIN Hu, KANNO Masayo 出版者 法政大学国際日本学研究所 journal or INTERNATIONAL JAPANESE STUDIES publication title volume 16 page range 13-33 year 2019-03-29 URL http://doi.org/10.15002/00021864 A Research on the Noda Cabinet’s Diplomatic Strategy: Focusing on the North Korea Policy 13 A Research on the Noda Cabinetʼs Diplomatic Strategy: Focusing on the North Korea Policy YIN Hu KANNO Masayo 1. Introduction Japanʼs policies toward the Democratic Peopleʼs Republic of Korea (DPRK) are not only issues concerning bilateral relations, but also complex international political issues which are determined by the complex political situations in Northeast Asia, including division of the Korean Peninsula, the confrontations between the two camps during the Cold War, and the extension of the United States of America (US)-South Korea alliance as well as the US-Japan alliance after the Cold War. It can be seen that all of the above affect the geopolitical developments in Northeast Asia as well as the foreign strategy of every country in the region.1 Moreover, Japanʼs policy toward North Korea has a direct impact on the changes in Japanʼs domestic political situation. Thus, it can be seen that only when putting Japan-DPRK relations in the political framework of Northeast Asia and analyzing through multilateral perspectives, can we grasp the essence of Japan-DPRK relations and predict the future trend.2 North Korea is the only country among those which were invaded by Japan that has yet to realize a normalization of diplomatic relations with Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • From Rhetoric to Reality: Japanese Foreign-Policy Making Under The
    From Rhetoric to Reality Foreign-Policy Making under the Democratic Party of Japan April 2012 The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis From Rhetoric to Reality Foreign-Policy Making under the Democratic Party of Japan April 2012 Weston S. Konishi A publication of The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis Contents Introduction and Acknowledgments iii Executive Summary v Main Findings v From Rhetoric to Reality: Foreign-Policy Making under the Democratic Party of Japan 1 Internal Challenges 4 Intra-party Divisions 4 The Complexities of Coalition Politics 7 Institutional Reforms: Toward Politician-Led Decision-Making 11 The DPJ’s Foreign Policy: Competing Visions 15 Realists 16 Pacifists 17 Centrists 17 Neo-Autonomists 18 Caveats 20 Prime Minister Hatoyama: An Agenda for Change 23 External Constraints on the Hatoyama Administration 27 The Kan Administration: Political Transition and Crisis Management 30 The Noda Administration: Shifting to the Center? 40 Findings and Implications 45 The Impact of Structural Obstacles on DPJ Foreign-Policy Making 45 Continuity versus Change 46 The DPJ: A Hawkish Party? 47 Bilateralism vs. Multilateralism 49 Competing Schools of Thought 51 Conclusion 54 APPENDIX A: Impact of Major Events on Cabinet Approval Ratings 56 FROM RHETORIC TO REALITY I APPENDIX B: The 2010 NDPG Process 59 APPENDIX C: Survey Data of DPJ Foreign Policy Viewpoints 62 APPENDIX D: Profiles of Key DPJ Politicians 63 APPENDIX E: Chronology of Major Events under DPJ Governments 79 Bibliography 86 About the Author 103 II FROM RHETORIC TO REALITY Introduction and Acknowledgments After more than fifty years of one-party dom- ister Kan Naoto, presided over Japan’s most chal- inance under the Liberal Democratic Par- lenging crisis since World War II—the March ty (LDP), Japan’s political landscape changed 11, 2011, Great East Japan Earthquake—before dramatically with the victory of the Democratic succumbing to his own political fate as a result Party of Japan (DPJ) in parliamentary elections of his inconsistent leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • IRI-2020-01 Japan's Foreign Policymaking Process and Power Shift
    IRI Joint Research Series IRI-2020-01 Japan's Foreign Policymaking Process and Power Shift Tomohito Shinoda International University of Japan March 2020 IUJ Research Institute International University of Japan These working papers are preliminary research documents published by the IUJ research institute. To facilitate prompt distribution, they have not been formally reviewed and edited. They are circulated in order to stimulate discussion and critical comment and may be revised. The views and interpretations expressed in these papers are those of the author(s). It is expected that the working papers will be published in some other form. Japan’s Foreign Policymaking Process and Power Shift Tomohito Shinoda Introduction Since the end of the Cold War era, Japan has experienced four political regime shifts between different parties. The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) first ceased its 38-year long reign in August 1993 with the establishment of the non-LDP coalition government led by Morihiro Hosokawa. This coalition lasted only ten months until June 1994 when the LDP regained power with the partnership with the Socialist Party and Sakigake. In September 2009, as a result of the landslide victory in the general election, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) took over the government. Another landslide election victory, however, brought the LDP back in power in December 2012. Political regime changes between different parties in a variety of nations often provoke foreign and national security policy restructurings, as challenging parties run election campaigns usually by criticizing the incumbent’s policies. For example, changes at the time of regime shift have been dominant feature of United States foreign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • N Ational C Ommittee Onu Nited S Tates
    2002 A NNUAL R EPORT N ATIONAL C OMMITTEE ON U NITED S TATES- C HINA R ELATIONS B OARD OF D IRECTORS * Chair Carla A. Hills Vice Chairmen William M. Daley Lee H. Hamilton William R. Rhodes J. Stapleton Roy James R. Sasser Ezra F. Vogel Treasurer Herbert J. Hansell Secretary Kathryn D. Christopherson Michael H. Armacost William E. Frenzel Elizabeth S. MacMillan Nancy Kassebaum Baker Peter F. Geithner Richard H. Matzke Julia Chang Bloch Sam Gibbons Kathryn Mohrman Mary Brown Bullock Bates Gill Douglas P.Murray Gareth C. C. Chang Thomas M. Gorrie Elizabeth J. Perry Thomas J. Christensen Harry Harding Thomas R. Pickering Edward T. Cloonan Jamie P.Horsley Joseph W. Prueher Jerome A. Cohen David A. Jones, Jr. Henry P.Sailer Ken W. Cole John T. Kamm Matt Salmon Barber B. Conable, Jr. Virginia Kamsky Nicholas V. Scheele Charles J. Conroy Thomas H. Kean James R. Schlesinger Ralph A. Cossa Geraldine S. Kunstadter David K. Y. Tang Douglas N. Daft David M. Lampton Nancy Bernkopf Tucker Gary Dirks Nicholas R. Lardy I. Peter Wolff Martin S. Feldstein Kenneth Lieberthal Madeleine Zelin Barbara H. Franklin Henry Luce III Chairmen Emeriti Directors Emeriti A. Doak Barnett (d.) Caroline L. Ahmanson W. Michael Blumenthal Robert O. Anderson Barber B. Conable, Jr. Theodore M. Hesburgh, C.S.C. Alexander Eckstein (d.) Carl F. Stover Lucian W. Pye Robert A. Scalapino Raymond P.Shafer Charles W. Yost (d.) *Effective December 6, 2001 – December 5, 2002 N ATIONAL C OMMITTEE ON U NITED S TATES- he National Committee on C HINA United States-China Relations T is a nonprofit educational R ELATIONS organization that encourages understanding of China and the United States among citizens of both countries.
    [Show full text]
  • News China Jan. 14.Cdr
    VOL. XXVI No. 1 January 2014 Rs. 20.00 2014 is the Year of Horse in Chinese Zodiac Signs. Chinese Foreign Minister Mr.Wang Yi meets with Dr. S. Mr. Zhang Kunsheng, the Chinese Assistant Foreign Jaishankar, the outgoing Indian Ambassador to China Minister and Director-General of the Protocol Department and appreciates his contribution to promote China-India accepts the copy of credentials of Mr. Ashok K Kantha, relations on Dec.9, 2013 in Beijing. the new Indian Ambassador to China, on Jan.6, 2014 in Beijing. Mr. Wei Wei, the Chinese Ambassador to India, addresses Chinese Ambassador Mr. Wei Wei talks with in the inauguration of “Haat of India” held in Bhopal, the representatives of Chinese enterprises during the “Haat capital of Madhya Pradesh on Dec. 21,2013. Over 150 of India”. The Trade Fair provided many conveniences for representatives of various Chinese enterprises attended Chinese exhibitors, including complimentary booths, the three-day’s Trade Fair. free room and translation. The First Joint Study Group Meeting of Bangladesh- Customers and shop owners of China and India talk China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor was held in happily at Renqinggang market in Yadong County of Kunming, the capital of Yunnan Province of China from southwest China’s Tibet Autonomous Region. With the Dec.18 to 19, 2013. Officials, experts, scholars and booming of China-India border trade the market posted a representatives of the four countries and international 23.3 percent rise in the year of 2013. organizations attended the meeting. Welcome to Yiwu An International Commodity Circulation Center! Crowned as ‘a sea of commodities and a has been a converging place of more than 4,000 paradise for shoppers’, Yiwu of China, which is distributing centers and general agents of located in Zhejiang province, boasts an famous enterprises from home and abroad, aggregate market floor area of 2.6 million including enterprises and merchants from square meters with 53,000 booths and 160,000 more than 40 countries such as USA, Japan, persons engaging in business.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Racionalidad Del Modelo De Desarrollo Chino
    Papel Político ISSN: 0122-4409 [email protected] Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Colombia Gélvez Rubio, Tatiana; Defelipe Villa, Camilo Racionalidad del modelo de desarrollo chino: una perspectiva intitucionalista Papel Político, vol. 21, núm. 1, enero-junio, 2016, pp. 9-34 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotá, Colombia Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77749755001 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto acinaia e e e ea c in na e ec ia in i cinai a a inai e C inee cnic e an n i inai e ec ie Tatiana Gélvez Rubio ** Camilo Defelipe Villa *** Recibido: 23 de julio de 2015 Aprobado: 18 noviembre de 2015 Disponible en línea: 30 de junio de 2016 e en ac El modelo de economía de mercado con ca- The market economy model with Chinese cha- racterísticas chinas ha consolidado libertades racteristics has strengthened market liberties for para el desarrollo de la actividad económica y the development of economic activity and higher mayores niveles de ingreso para la población; sin income levels for its people; nevertheless, some embargo, algunas prácticas económicas todavía economic practices are still carried out under se desarrollan de acuerdo con lógicas de planifi- centralized planning, in contrast to the principles cación centralizada contrarias a los principios de of efficiency and economic reward, something eficiencia y premio económico que distorsionan that directly distorts agents’ economic decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dc70335520114d23b414da1594
    Vice-premier Liu Yandong met with Helle Thorning-Schmidt, former prime minister of Denmark. Vice-president Li Yuanchao met with Sir Henry Keswick, chairman of Jardine Matheson Group. State Councilor Yang Jiechi met with the delegation of Mexican governors. Lin Wenyi, vice-chairwoman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, together with Oleg Dgomin, Ambassador of Ukraine to China, attended the celebration marking the 25th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Ukraine. Contents Express News FOCUS 04 CPAFFC President Li Xiaolin Meets Guests at Belt and Road Forum / Our Staff Reporter 05 CPAFFC President Li Xiaolin Attends Launching Ceremony of Essilor and Xingxian County PovertyAlleviation Program “Bright Sight, Viewing World” /Fan Lili 05 Reception Marks 45th Anniversary of China-Madagascar Diplomatic Relations / Fang Ying 06 Vice-President Xie Yuan Attends Flying Tiger C-47 Dedication Ceremony / Chen Ke 04 06 Opening Ceremony of Zhou Enlai Memorial Exhibition Held in Kyoto / Yu Xiaodong 07 Vice-President Lin Yi Attends Events Marking the 60th Anniversary of the Establishment of Diplomatic Ties Between China and Sri Lanka / Jiao Tianjiao 07 China-Japan New Year Concert Held in Beijing / Gao Hui 08 CPAFFC Secretary-General Li Xikui Visits Spain and Morocco / Zhan Xiushuang 35 08 China National Peking Opera Company Achieves Great Success in Performances in Japan/ Gao Weimin 09 Foreign Friends Plant Trees to Make Beijing Greener / Beijing Friendship Association
    [Show full text]