Jerioth Jeroboam I. King of Israel I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jerioth Jeroboam I. King of Israel I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament II 977 Jeroboam I. King of Israel 978 Bibliography: ■ Fries, J., “Im Dienst am Hause des Herrn”: Lite- gious identity he erected golden calves in the tem- raturwissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zu 2 Chr 29–31: Zur Hizki- ples of Bethel and Dan. From a later Judean view, jatradition in Chronik (ATSAT 60; St. Ottilien 1998). which supported the centralized cult in Jerusalem, Martin Prudký this was seen as a deliberate move to discourage See also /Jeremoth northerners from worshipping in the temple built by Solomon. In fact it might have been the continu- ation of local sanctuaries. The Deuteronomists la- Jerioth beled this act as the “sin of Jeroboam” that had pol- luted the Northern Kingdom. This later perspective The female name Jerioth (MT Yĕrîôt; LXX Ιεριωθ) comes to the fore in the narrative of 1 Kgs 13 : 1–6. appears in 1 Chr 2 : 18 in the section of Judah (1 Chr Here a “man of god,” the visionary Iddo, is said to 2 : 3–4 : 23) inside the Chronicler’s opening geneal- have warned the king that a later king of Judah by ogy (1Chr 1–9). Since the text is corrupt, several hy- the name of Josiah will destroy the altar in Bethel. potheses are discussed: (1) She is one of the wives In the aftermath of his usurpation Jeroboam had to of Caleb besides Azubah and others. (2) According wage war with Judah. to the Syr. and the Vg., she is the daughter of Caleb The account by the Chronicler on Jeroboam I and Azubah; (3) She is the mother of Azubah. (4) reveals the pro-Judaean point of view of this histo- For the Talmud, she is identified with Azubah and rian. The military conflict mentioned above is Miriam, since her name, explained through the brought to mythical dimensions by the Chronicler word (curtain), could refer to the paleness of yĕrî â who assumed hundreds of thousands of soldiers on the illness of Miriam (bSot 12a). The corrupt text both sides (2 Chr 13). According to this late tradi- and the postexilic dating of 1 Chr 2 : 18 make it dif- tion Jeroboam left the battlefield crippled and lost ficult to know anything about her. the southern part of his territory which included Bibliography: ■ Klein, R. W., 1 Chronicles (Hermeneia; Min- the illicit cultic center of Bethel. neapolis, Minn. 2006). Bibliography: ■ Bodner, K., Jeroboam’s Royal Drama (Oxford Fabian Pfitzmann 2012). ■ Chung, Y. H., The Sin of the Calf: The Rise of the Bible’s Negative Attitude Toward the Golden Calf (LHBOTS 523; New York 2010). ■ Debus, J., Die Sünde Jerobeams: Studien Jeroboam I. King of Israel zur Darstellung Jerobeams und der Geschichte des Nordreichs in der deuteronomistischen Geschichtsschreibung (FRLANT 93; Göttin- I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament gen 1967). ■ Williamson, H. G. M., Israel in the Book of II. Judaism Chronicles (Cambridge 1977). [Esp. 97–118] III. Literature Bob Becking I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament II. Judaism Jeroboam (MT Yorobām, “the people/Uncle [theo- The 1st-century CE Lives of the Prophets 22 : 1 is the phoric title] judges”; LXX Ιεραμ), the son of Ne- earliest source of the tradition, “found in the writ- bat, was the first king to rule over the Northern ings of certain Church fathers that one of Jero- kingdom of Israel. According to biblical traditions, boam’s golden calves was set up in Gilgal instead he reigned for twenty-two years. The exact dates of Dan” (Charlesworth 2 : 397, n. 22b). cannot be settled, but generally he is seen as reign- Not surprisingly, the sages took a rather dim ing in the second part of the 10th century BCE. view of Jeroboam. They explained his name Jero- The HB depicts him as follows – the historicity boam (Heb. Yarav‘am) as meaning that “he debased of this depiction cannot be verified due to the lack (ribba‘) the nation (‘am)”; or “he fomented strife of extra-biblical evidence: Jeroboam was the son of (merivah) within the nation,” or strife between Israel Nebat, an Ephraimite, and Zeruah, who is pre- and their Father in heaven.” The son of Nebat [de- sented as a widow (1 Kgs 11 : 26). Two of his sons, notes that] “he [Nebat] beheld (i.e., had a vision; Abijam and Nadab, succeeded him on the throne. nibbat), but did not see (i.e., did not interpret it cor- In his younger days, Jeroboam was a protégé of rectly, thinking that he would become king rather king Solomon. The prophet Ahijah, however, urged than his son)” (bSan 101b). him to conspire against Solomon in order to be- 1. His Learning. Yet, despite his later idolatry, Jer- come king over the ten tribes (1 Kgs 11 : 29–39). His oboam is also portrayed as a great Torah scholar, plot was discovered and he was forced to flee to whose knowledge was without defect (bSan 102a). Egypt coming under the ward of Pharaoh Shishak. He expounded the book of Leviticus 103 different After Solomon’s death the ten northern tribes ways, more than either kings Manasseh (55 ways) appointed his son Rehoboam as their king. With or Ahab (85) (bSan 103b). First Kings 11 : 29, refer- the backing of Pharaoh Shishak and political sup- ring to Jeroboam and Ahijah the Shilonite being port from the local population, Jeroboam became alone in a field, was understood to mean that “all king over Israel. He made Shechem his capital and the other scholars were as grasses of the field com- fortified the city. As an expression of northern reli- pared to them, and all the wisdom of the Torah Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception vol. 13 Authenticated | [email protected] © Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, 2016 Download Date | 1/2/19 1:27 AM 979 Jeroboam I. King of Israel 980 was an open field to them and they discovered new As a way of alluding to the far-reaching conse- insights that no ear had ever heard” (ibid.). Ahijah quences of Jeroboam’s actions, one rabbi mused and Jeroboam (before he went astray) were even that on the day that Jeroboam set up two calves, mystical adepts capable of clarifying the work of the Remus and Romulus arose and built two forts in chariot (ma‘aseh merkavah)(MidTeh 5 : 8). Ahijah was Rome (Sifrei, end of ‘Eqev; cf. bShab 56b). blind in his old age (1 Kgs 14 : 4) because he had 4. His Demise. Jeroboam was killed on the twenty- raised a wicked disciple – Jeroboam (BerR 65 : 10). fifth day of Sivan (end of MegTa). His arrogance 2. His Kingship. Jeroboam merited kingship for drove him out of the world (bSan 101b). Opinions rebuking Solomon, but he was punished for rebuk- differ as to whether he had a share in the World to ing him in public (bSan 101b). He became king at Come (yes: bSan 90a; no: ySan 10). However, in the the conclusion of the sabbatical (shemittah) year days of the Messiah, even the likes of Jeroboam son (yAZ 1 : 1). When the people asked Jeroboam to be of Nebat and his colleagues will be resurrected (yKil their king, he told them he was poor and they of- 9 : 3, commenting on Ps 116 : 9). fered him silver and gold (YalqMa 17 : 12). The rab- 5. In Karaism. The early Karaites saw Jeroboam as bis likened him to a man who found a garment on the main instigator of the rabbinic movement. For the road and brought it into the city, proclaiming Ya‘qūb al-Qirqisānī, the great 10th-century Karaite “Who lost this?” Impressed by his virtue, the theologian and historiographer, in his account of townspeople made him their leader. By the time a Jewish sects (ch. 1 of his “Book of Lights and Watch- few years had passed, however, he had destroyed towers,” Kitab al-anwār wal marāqib [KAM]), Jero- the entire city (YalqShim Be-shallaḥ 268). boam is the first heretic, “the first to propagate dis- 3. His Idolatry. When Jeroboam was scheming to sension in religion and to sow rebellion in the wrest the throne from Rehoboam, he “took counsel family of Israel” (KAM 1.2.1; Chiesa/Lockwood: 95; and made two golden calves” (1 Kgs 12 : 28). The Astren: 114). Oddly enough, though, he denies that rabbis wondered what counsel he took and imagine Jeroboam was an idolater: “for Jeroboam did not the following scenario: “He seated a wicked man deny or disbelieve in the Creator … nor did he wor- beside a righteous man [in the council chamber] ship idols, as some imagine” (KAM 1.2.2; Chiesa/ and asked them if they would vouch for everything Lockwood: 97; Astren: 114 attributes this to his de- he did. They both agreed. He told them he wanted sire to keep Jeroboam within the fold of religion). to be king and they agreed. He asked them if they He further claims that the Rabbanites followed the would fulfill everything he commanded and they practices inherited from Jeroboam, which they es- agreed. Then he asked if that included worshiping tablished, advocated for, and codified in the Mish- idols. The righteous man said “Heaven forbid” but nah and other works (KAM 1.2.6; Chiesa/Lockwood: the wicked man said Jeroboam was only testing 101; Astren: 118). Jeroboam is also blamed for in- them to see if they would obey him. Everyone troducing his own system of calendar intercalation signed on including Ahijah (bSan 101b-102a). Ac- which was adopted by the Samaritans (Astren: 118). cording to the Jerusalem Talmud, the people were In the Ḥilluq ha-Qari’im weha-rabbanim (The differ- eager to worship idols and could not wait for Jero- ence between the Karaites and the Rabbanites), an boam to lead them into idolatry.
Recommended publications
  • The Second Book of Kings
    THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS Elisha and the end of the house of Ahab 11AFTER AHAB’S DEATH Moab rebelled against Israel. 2Ahaziah fell through a latticed window in his roof-chamber in Samaria and injured himself; he sent messengers to inquire of Baal-zebub the god of Ekron whether he would recover from his illness. 3The angel of the LORD ordered Elijah the Tishbite to go and meet the messengers of the king of Samaria and say to them, ‘Is there no god in Israel, that you go to inquire of Baal-zebub the god of Ekron? 4This is the word of the LORD to your master: “You shall not rise from the bed where you are lying; you will die.” ’ Then Elijah departed. 5The messengers went back to the king. When asked why they had returned, 6they answered that a man had come to meet them and had ordered them to return and say to the king who had sent them, ‘This is the word of the LORD: “Is there no god in Israel, that you send to inquire of Baal-zebub the god of Ekron? In consequence, you shall not rise from the bed where you are lying; you will die.” ’ 7The king asked them what kind of man it was who had met them and said this. 8‘A hairy man’, they answered, ‘with a leather apron round his waist.’ ‘It is Elijah the Tishbite’, said the king. 9Then the king sent a captain to him with his company of fifty. He went up and found the prophet sitting on a hill-top and said to him, ‘Man of God, the king orders you to come down.’ 10Elijah answered the captain, ‘If I am a man of God, may fire fall from heaven and consume you and your company!’ Fire fell from heaven and consumed the officer and his fifty men.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertextual Connection to the Elijah/Jezebel
    Scholars Crossing LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations 2005 Femme Fatale Redux: Intertextual Connection to the Elijah/ Jezebel Narratives in Mark 6:14–29 Gary E. Yates Liberty University, [email protected] David M. Hoffeditz Cedarville University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Yates, Gary E. and Hoffeditz, David M., "Femme Fatale Redux: Intertextual Connection to the Elijah/ Jezebel Narratives in Mark 6:14–29" (2005). LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations. 4. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bulletin for Biblical Research 15.2 (2005) 199-221. Femme Fatale Redux: Intertextual Connection to the Elijah/ Jezebel Narratives in Mark 6:14–29 DAVID M. HOFFEDITZ AND GARY E. YATES CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY LIBERTY UNIVERSITY In this article we trace important intertextual connections between the pe- ricopes of the beheading of John in Mark’s Gospel and the OT narratives sur- rounding the figures of Jezebel and Elijah. This form of intertextuality serves three key polemical purposes in Mark’s narrative: 1. to highlight the culpability and despicability of Herodias in having John put to death by depicting her as another Jezebel—the epitome of female wickedness in the OT; 2. to demonstrate the irony of reversal in that the OT narrative has the word of the prophet putting the wicked queen to death, while in the NT, the word of the wicked queen succeeds in bringing about the death of the prophet; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom Quest Year 4 - Lesson 16 (SAMPLE), Grade 1-4 - 1
    Date: ___________________________ Series: Good Kings/Bad Kings Fall Year 4, Lesson16 (SAMPLE) Bad Kings— Merciful God Take Home Point: *Be humble before God and receive his mercy. *Repeat this phrase throughout the lesson. Bible Event: 2 Chronicles 12:9-16 King Rehoboam Key Verse: I Peter 5:6, “Be humbled by God’s power so that when the right time comes he will honor you.” We will help kids know: • Rehoboam and his son, Abijah, were the first two kings of the Southern Kingdom. They did evil, though one humbled himself and total destruction was prevented. • If we refuse to follow God, we have consequences. • To be humble is to recognize that God is most powerful and we need him. We will help kids feel: • Motivated to heed God’s warnings and follow him. • Comforted that God always welcomes us back in his mercy as we humble ourselves and acknowledge that we need him. We will help kids do: • Demonstrate that we might try to do things on our own but God really holds the power. • Make “humble bugs” to remind them to be humble before God. • Build up and encourage each other. Kingdom Quest Year 4 - Lesson 16 (SAMPLE), Grade 1-4 - 1 Copyright 2005 Kids Kount Publishing, Omaha, NE 68137, www.kidskountpublishing.com Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture verses are from GOD’S WORD®. Copyright 1995 by God’s Word to the Nations. Permission to photocopy Kids Church and Kingdom Quest materials granted to purchaser only for local church use. THIS LESSON’S ROADMAP PAGE DISCOVERIES ON DESTINATION SUPPLIES NEEDED # YOUR JOURNEY 3 Using an empty pop can • a can of pop Small Group or paper cup, the kids • three empty pop cans with no dents Warm-Up will learn how easy it is • cups to be humbled.
    [Show full text]
  • The Campaign of Pharaoh Shishak to Palestine
    THE CAMPAIGN OF PHARAOH SHISHAK TO PALESTINE BY B. MAZAR Jerusalem (Isr.) The campaign of Pharaoh Shishak the First belongs to the most important historical events which determined the history of Palestine in the period following the reign of Solomon. According to the evidence of the Book of Kings it occurred in the fifth year of Reho­ boam, king of Judah, that is shortly after the split in the kingdom of Israel began to show its results and cause political complications and a weakening of the rule both in J udah and in Israel. Thus it was a propitious time for the founder of the Twenty-Second Libyan Dynasty to raise the prestige of his monarchy, to carry out his aim of appearing as an important political force in the areas of Western Asia adjoining Egypt as well as to profit from the occasion by enrich­ ing his country with the spoil of the Palestinian cities. The military campaign was preceded by recurrent attempts of Pharaoh Shishak to interfere in the affairs of the Israelite kingdom, which, inter alia, found their expression in the support he gave Jeroboam against Solomon, in the political ferment which he evoked in Edom and possibly even in the extension of his power over Philistia. It is obvious that the construction of fortresses and chariot cities, such as Gezer, Beth-Horon and Baalath, which were carried out by Solomon in the later years of his reign, were the results of the aggressive policy pursued by Shishak against the Kingdom of Israel, in marked contrast to the line followed by the kings of the preceding Twenty-First Dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • If Not Empire, What? a Survey of the Bible
    If Not Empire, What? A Survey of the Bible Berry Friesen John K. Stoner www.bible-and-empire.net CreateSpace December 2014 2 If Not Empire, What? A Survey of the Bible If Not Empire, What? A Survey of the Bible Copyright © 2014 by Berry Friesen and John K. Stoner The content of this book may be reproduced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ International Standard Book Number: 978-0692344781 For Library of Congress information, contact the authors. Bible quotations unless otherwise noted are taken from the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), copyright 1989, Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Cover design by Judith Rempel Smucker. For information or to correspond with the authors, send email to [email protected] Bound or electronic copies of this book may be obtained from www.amazon.com. The entire content also is available in PDF format reader at www.bible-and-empire.net. For the sake of concordance with our PDF edition, the page numbering in this book begins with the title page. Published in cooperation with CreateSpace, DBA On-Demand Publishing, LLC December 2014 If Not Empire, What? A Survey of the Bible 3 *** Naboth owned a vineyard beside the palace grounds; the king asked to buy it. Naboth refused, saying, “This land is my ancestral inheritance; YHWH would not want me to sell my heritage.” This angered the king. Not only had Naboth refused to sell, he had invoked his god as his reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart of the Kings of Israel and Judah
    The Kings of Israel & Judah Why Study the Kings? Chart of the Kings Questions for Discussion The Heritage of Jesus Host: Alan's Gleanings Alphabetical List of the Kings A Comment about Names God's Message of Salvation Kings of the United Kingdom (c 1025-925 BC) Relationship to God's King Previous King Judgment Saul none did evil Ishbosheth* son (unknown) David none did right Solomon did right in youth, son (AKA Jedidiah) evil in old age * The kingdom was divided during Ishbosheth's reign; David was king over the tribe of Judah. Kings of Judah (c 925-586 BC) Kings of Israel (c 925-721 BC) Relationship to God's Relationship to God's King King Previous King Judgment Previous King Judgment Rehoboam son did evil Abijam Jeroboam servant did evil son did evil (AKA Abijah) Nadab son did evil Baasha none did evil Asa son did right Elah son did evil Zimri captain did evil Omri captain did evil Ahab son did evil Jehoshaphat son did right Ahaziah son did evil Jehoram son did evil (AKA Joram) Jehoram son of Ahab did evil Ahaziah (AKA Joram) (AKA Azariah son did evil or Jehoahaz) Athaliah mother did evil Jehu captain mixed Joash did right in youth, son of Ahaziah Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Joash did right in youth, son did evil Amaziah son (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Jeroboam II son did evil Zachariah son did evil did evil Uzziah Shallum none son did right (surmised) (AKA Azariah) Menahem none did evil Pekahiah son did evil Jotham son did right Pekah captain did evil Ahaz son did evil Hoshea none did evil Hezekiah son did right Manasseh son did evil Amon son did evil Josiah son did right Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Shallum) Jehoiakim Assyrian captivity son of Josiah did evil (AKA Eliakim) Jehoiachin (AKA Coniah son did evil or Jeconiah) Zedekiah son of Josiah did evil (AKA Mattaniah) Babylonian captivity Color Code Legend: King did right King did evil Other.
    [Show full text]
  • King Jeroboam II
    983 Jeroboam II. King of Israel 984 James Joyce’s Finnegan’s Wake (1939) mentions earthquake in the area in 750 BCE. Jeroboam is Gubbs Jeroboam, “the frothwhiskered pest of the mentioned only once in extra-biblical sources, in a park, as per act one, section two, schedule three, seal with the following inscription: “belonging to clause four of the fifth of King Jark” (3.4.558.15). Shema / the servant of Jeroboam” (Davies: 100.068; As with the rest of the Wake, simple extrapolations Fig. 1). According to the palaeography this inscrip- of meaning elude us, but here Gubbs appears as an tion is to be dated in the 8th century BCE. It can orbital character related to the domestic drama of therefore not refer to Jeroboam I. The authenticity book 3.4, but one that also harks back to “Yawn’s of this seal is however disputed. Inquest” in book 3.3. Again, Jeroboam sits as one In rabbinic sources, Jeroboam is praised for his judged and requiring of “mercy” on “his hurlybur- respect for the prophets, for which he was rewarded lygrowth” (558.20). by being allowed to conquer nations that Joshua The Trails of Brother Jero (1960) is a satirical com- and David could not (SEZ 7). He also did not believe edy by the Nigerian playwright Akinwande Oluw- the slanderous reports of Amaziah against Amos ole “Wole” Soyinka. It mocks religious hypocrisy (Am 7 : 10-11), claiming that Amos had predicted through its protagonist, brother Jeroboam, who Jeroboam’s death by the sword and Israel’s exile.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Ancient Israel's Politics
    Evolution of Ancient Israel’s Politics Tribes, Monarchies, and Foreign Empires Three Significant Eras • In his writings on the Politics of Ancient Israel sourced from the U of A website, Norman Gottwald suggests ancient Israel moved through three main ‘zones’ (or eras) of political structure. • Tribal Era (1,200 BCE – 1,000 BCE) • Monarchic Era (1,000 BCE – 586 BCE) • Colonial Era (586 BCE – 135 CE) • Brief revival of the monarchy under the Hasmonean Dynasty, 140 - 63 B.C.E • He notes that these eras did not totally displace one another, but overlapped and aspects of each period can be seen in future eras. - https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/2001/politics Tribal Era (1,200 BCE – 1,000 BCE) • Jacob (renamed Israel) had 12 sons known for 12 tribes of Israel. • No tribe for Joseph but tribes for his sons Ephraim and Manasseh • Tribe of Levi owned no property. They were the Priestly tribe supported by the other tribes. • “The Lord said to Aaron (Levite), ‘You will have no inheritance in their land, nor will you have any share among them; I am your share and your inheritance among the Israelites.” Numbers 18:20 From Tribes to Nation-building • In Ancient Israel’s history up to the Exodus, leadership was Tribal. • Leadership within the tribe was inherited similarly to everything else, emphasis on the oldest living son. • Beginning with the Exodus, we have our first example of ‘national unity’. Moses was God’s chosen leader to bring the Hebrew people out of slavery to the Holy Land, where they are referenced as Israelites.
    [Show full text]
  • “Foremost in Rank and Foremost in Power”: Conflict Over the First-Born in Israel
    "FOREMOST IN RANK AND FOREMOST IN POWER": CONFLICT OVER THE FIRST-BORN IN ISRAEL HARVEY SICHERMAN & GILAD J. GEVARYAHU When the patriarch Jacob blessed his children on the verge of his death, he described Reuben as 'My first-born, first of my strength, first of my vitality . foremost in rank and foremost in power' (Gen. 49:4). But he disqualified Reuben for reasons of personality ( unstable as water [49:4]) and for his act 1 of consorting with Bilhah, Jacob's concubine (35:22). Moreover, Jacob did not assign Reuben's privileges to one other son, but rather to three other sons. As the Targum Jonathan (49:3) writes, "The birthright was given to Jo- seph." Jacob had earlier made clear that Joseph's two sons, Ephraim and Ma- nasseh, would be regarded as his own, thus giving to the first-born son of his 2 favorite wife, Rachel, the double portion usually accorded to the eldest son. Furthermore, in the course of that earlier blessing, Jacob elevated Ephraim, the younger son, above his older brother Manasseh, despite Joseph's protest. Secondly, the Targum notes that "the kingship was given to Judah." In the long discourse popularly known as the Blessing of Jacob, the patriarch as- signed Judah the right to rule (49:9-10), exalting his strength and promising that, the scepter shall not depart from Judah until he come to Shiloh, and to 3 him will assemble all the nations, (49:10). Finally, the Targum concludes "the priesthood was given to Levi." Each of these reassignments was linked to physical location: Joseph to She- chem, Judah to Shiloh, and Levi to the place that the Lord thy God will choose from among all the tribes to place His name there.
    [Show full text]
  • Semitica 62, 2020, P
    Athaliah and the Theopolitics of Royal Assassination Cat Quine University of Nottingham Abstract. While the kingdom of Israel experienced eight military coups in its shorter his- tory, the kingdom of Judah saw only four assassinations of its monarchs, three of which were Athaliah, her usurper, and his successor.1 This sequence of untimely royal deaths in Judah stands in contrast to the stability of Israel’s royal line under the Jehuite dynasty, whose kings are said to have entreated Yahweh, sought advice from prophets, and defeated Judah at Beth-Shemesh. From a later perspective it seems that whereas Yahweh previously protected the Judahite kings, in the ninth-eighth centuries BCE the Jehuite kings enjoyed Yahweh’s favour more than the Davidides. This paper thus considers the theopolitical im- pact of untimely royal deaths in ninth-eighth century Judah and argues that the instability of the Judahite royal line after her marriage contributed to the negative biblical portrayal of Athaliah and the Omride-Judahite alliance. Résumé. Cependant que le royaume d’Israël a connu huit coups d’État, le royaume de Juda n’a subi que quatre assassinats royaux, parmi lesquels Athalie, son usurpateur et son suc- cesseur. Cette séquence tranche avec la stabilité de la dynastie jéhuite, dont les rois implo- rent Yahvé, cherchent conseil auprès des prophètes, et défont Juda à Beth-Shémesh. De ce point de vue, il semble qu’aux IXᵉ-VIIIᵉ s. av. J.-Ch. les rois jéhuites bénéficient plus que les davidides de la faveur de Yahvé, alors même que ce dernier protégeait jusqu’alors les rois judaïtes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Age of Kings: 1 & 2 Samuel, 1 & 2 Kings, 1 & 2 Chronicles
    The Age of Kings: 1 & 2 Samuel, 1 & 2 Kings, 1 & 2 Chronicles The Age of Kings: What can history, even biblical history, possibly reveal to us about God? What was God up to in the reign of King David and his son Solomon? Why did God destroy ancient Jerusalem and send them into exile for seventy years? What relevance can the age of Old Testament kings possibly have in the life of a twenty-first century believer? Why did God speak prophetically to his people during this period of time? These questions and more will be considered in this class. We will explore together God’s redemptive historical work revealed in the pages of scripture and see how the mission of the people of God both then and now has always been the same. The objective of this class is: to gain an appreciation for the period of the northern & southern monarchies in the OT, and understand the relationship between the redemptive work of God and the events that unfolded during this specific time in history. Careful attention will be given to both the Davidic Covenant as well as the decline and exile of the people of God. Introduction: This week we study together the life and death of Solomon and the Divided Kingdom. We will witness the turning point in his life as a vassal king, and will discuss the reign of his son, which is predominantly characterized by division. Never again would the house of Israel be united under one king. Never again will a unified covenant community have an earthly vassal sitting on the throne presiding over a geographically limited area to which the fullness of God’s kingdom is confined.
    [Show full text]
  • Wars and Rumours of Wars
    Kenneth A. Kitchen, The Bible in its World: The Bible and Archaeology Today. Exeter: The Paternoster Press, 1977. Pbk. pp.168. [p.108] 7 Wars and Rumours of Wars Twin Kingdoms 1. End of an Empire In the last decade or so of his reign, Solomon’s regime was beset with problems at home and abroad. On the south, prince Hadad of Edom returned from Egyptian exile to reclaim the independence of Edom (1 Kings 11:14-22). This must have endangered Solomon’s hold on the Arabah rift valley (south from the Dead Sea) with its access to copper-deposits, and to Ezion-Geber and the Red Sea. His sources of wealth from the south, therefore, were probably curtailed. In the north, a certain Rezon gained control of Damascus and the former kingdom of Aram-Zobah (1 Kings 11:23-25). With this revolt, Solomon’s northern foreign holdings fell away completely. An independent Aram cut him off both from Hamath (now also left independent) and from the routes to the Euphrates; northern trade would suffer. Nearer home, one Jeroboam son of Nebat was heralded by a prophet as future ruler of the northern tribes of Israel as distinct from Judah and Benjamin. Solomon’s attempts to eliminate him were frustrated by Jeroboam’s flight into Egypt, he finding safe haven at the court of the new pharaoh Shishak (1 Kings 11:26-40), i.e. Shoshenq I, founder of the new, Libyan, Twenty-second Dynasty. Stripped of supporting revenues from both north and south, taxation now bore heavily upon the Hebrew people [p.109] themselves―and perhaps more upon Israel than on Judah (possibly favoured by the royal house).
    [Show full text]