FOXM1: a Multifunctional Oncoprotein and Emerging Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FOXM1: a Multifunctional Oncoprotein and Emerging Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer cancers Review FOXM1: A Multifunctional Oncoprotein and Emerging Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer Cassie Liu, Carter J. Barger and Adam R. Karpf * Eppley Institute and Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68918-6805, USA; [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (C.J.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-402-559-6115 Simple Summary: Ovarian cancer is a lethal disease in women with a 10-year survival rate of <40% worldwide. A key molecular alteration in ovarian cancer is the aberrant overexpression and activation of the transcription factor forkhead box M1 (FOXM1). FOXM1 regulates the expression of a multitude of genes that promote cancer, including those that increase the growth, survival, and metastatic spread of cancer cells. Importantly, FOXM1 overexpression is a robust biomarker for poor prognosis in pan-cancer and ovarian cancer. In this review, we first discuss the molecular mechanisms controlling FOXM1 expression and activity, with a specific emphasis on ovarian cancer. We then discuss the evidence for and the manner by which FOXM1 expression promotes aggressive cancer biology. Finally, we discuss the clinical utility of FOXM1, including its potential as a cancer biomarker and as a therapeutic target in ovarian cancer. Abstract: Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) is a member of the conserved forkhead box (FOX) transcription factor family. Over the last two decades, FOXM1 has emerged as a multifunctional oncoprotein and a robust biomarker of poor prognosis in many human malignancies. In this review article, we address the current knowledge regarding the mechanisms of regulation and oncogenic functions of FOXM1, Citation: Liu, C.; Barger, C.J.; Karpf, particularly in the context of ovarian cancer. FOXM1 and its associated oncogenic transcriptional A.R. FOXM1: A Multifunctional signature are enriched in >85% of ovarian cancer cases and FOXM1 expression and activity can Oncoprotein and Emerging be enhanced by a plethora of genomic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer. mechanisms. As a master transcriptional regulator, FOXM1 promotes critical oncogenic phenotypes Cancers 2021, 13, 3065. https:// doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123065 in ovarian cancer, including: (1) cell proliferation, (2) invasion and metastasis, (3) chemotherapy resistance, (4) cancer stem cell (CSC) properties, (5) genomic instability, and (6) altered cellular Academic Editor: Katsutoshi Oda metabolism. We additionally discuss the evidence for FOXM1 as a cancer biomarker, describe the rationale for FOXM1 as a cancer therapeutic target, and provide an overview of therapeutic strategies Received: 25 May 2021 used to target FOXM1 for cancer treatment. Accepted: 16 June 2021 Published: 19 June 2021 Keywords: FOXM1; forkhead box M1; transcription factors; oncogenes; oncoproteins; ovarian cancer; high-grade serous ovarian cancer Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affil- iations. 1. Introduction 1.1. FOX Proteins and FOXM1 Discovery Forkhead box (FOX) proteins are a family of transcription factors defined by an evolutionarily conserved 80–100 amino acid domain called the forkhead box or winged- Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. helix motif [1–5]. There are 50 known FOX genes in the human genome divided into Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 19 subfamilies (A–S) [6]. Sequence variation outside of the shared forkhead box motif This article is an open access article leads to diverse mechanisms of regulation and function between FOX subfamilies, and distributed under the terms and different FOX subfamilies are involved in critical cellular processes and govern organ conditions of the Creative Commons system functions [7]. For example, the FOXA subfamily participates in cellular metabolism Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ and the development of endoderm-derived organs [8]; the FOXC subfamily promotes 4.0/). blood vessel maturation and lymphatic sprouting [9]; the FOXO subfamily regulates Cancers 2021, 13, 3065. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123065 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers Cancers 2021, 13, 3065 2 of 40 Cancers 2021, 13, 3065 development of endoderm-derived organs [8]; the FOXC subfamily promotes blood ves- 2 of 39 sel maturation and lymphatic sprouting [9]; the FOXO subfamily regulates cell cycle arrest at G1, apoptosis, and resistance to oxidative and cellular stress [10]; the FOXP subfamily is involved cellin immune cycle arrest system at G1, functions, apoptosis, including and resistance coordinating to oxidative the development and cellular and stress [10]; the function of BFOXP and T subfamily lymphocytes is involved [11]. in immune system functions, including coordinating the FOXM1development is the sole member and function of the of FOXM B and subfamily T lymphocytes [6]. Historically, [11]. FOXM1 held alternative names:FOXM1 Trident is [12], the soleWIN member [13], hepatocyte of the FOXM nuclear subfamily factor 3 [6(HNF3)]. Historically, [14], fork FOXM1 held head homologalternative 11 (HFH-11) names: Trident[14,15], [12 FKHL16], WIN [13 [15],], hepatocyte M-phase nuclear phosphoprotein factor 3 (HNF3) 2 [14], fork (MPHOSPH2,head MPP2) homolog [16], 11MPM2-reactive (HFH-11) [14 ,phosphoprotein15], FKHL16 [15], 2 M-phase(MPP2) [16], phosphoprotein and TGT3 [17]. 2 (MPHOSPH2, In 1997, FOXM1MPP2) was [16 first], MPM2-reactive identified by Korver phosphoprotein et al. as Trident 2 (MPP2) from [16 mouse], and TGT3thymus [17 tissue]. In 1997, FOXM1 [12], by Yaowas et al. first as WIN identified from bya rat Korver insulinoma et al. ascell Trident line [13], from and mouse by Ye thymus et al. as tissue HNF- [12], by Yao 3/HFH-11 fromet al. a human as WIN colon from carcinoma a rat insulinoma cell line cell[14]. line These [13 initial], and studies by Ye etreported al. as HNF-3/HFH-11that FOXM1 is widelyfrom a expressed human colon in embryonic carcinoma tissues cell line but [14 ].that These its expression initial studies is restricted reported thatin FOXM1 is adult tissueswidely to actively expressed proliferating in embryonic cells, tissuessuch as but those that in its the expression thymus and is restricted gastrointesti- in adult tissues to nal tract [12–14,18].actively proliferatingIndeed, later cells, studies such confirmed as those in that the FOXM1 thymus andis highly gastrointestinal expressed tract in [12–14,18]. embryonic [19–22],Indeed, regenerative later studies [23–26], confirmed and that cancerous FOXM1 tissues is highly [27–29] expressed and all in of embryonic them [19–22], exhibit highregenerative proliferative [23 capacity.–26], and The cancerous FOXM1 tissues field [ 27and–29 publications] and all of them have exhibit increased high proliferative steadily sincecapacity. the year The 2000, FOXM1 with a field large and prop publicationsortion of studies have increasedfocused on steadily cancer since(Figure the year 2000, 1). with a large proportion of studies focused on cancer (Figure1). Figure 1. AnnualFigure FOXM1 1. Annual Publications. FOXM1 The Publications. data shown The were data generated shown fromwere PubMedgenerated searches from PubMed conducted searches on 04/13/21. The search terms usedconducted (all fields) on were04/13/21. “FOXM1” The search (results terms in red), used “FOXM1 (all fields) cancer” were (results “FOXM1” in purple), (results and in “FOXM1 red), “FOXM1 ovarian cancer” (results in green).cancer” The first(results “FOXM1 in purple), ovarian and cancer” “FOXM1 PubMed ovaria recordn cancer” is the (results TCGA HGSCin green). study The published first “FOXM1 in 2011 [30]. ovarian cancer” PubMed record is the TCGA HGSC study published in 2011 [30]. 1.2. FOXM1 1.2.Structure FOXM1 and Structure Transcriptional and Transcriptional Activity Activity The human FOXM1The human gene,FOXM1 locatedgene, at chromosome located at 12p13.33, chromosome consists 12p13.33, of ten consistsexons, in- of ten exons, cluding exonsincluding I–VIII and exons alternatively I–VIII and spliced alternatively exons Va spliced and VIIa exons [13,15,28]. Va and VIIaExon [ 13Va,15 en-,28]. Exon Va codes a 15 aminoencodes acid a 15insertion amino acidinto insertionthe DNA into binding the DNA domain binding (DBD), domain which (DBD), is a feature which is a feature not seen in othernot seen FOX in family other FOXmembers. family On members. the other On hand, the otherexon VIIa hand, encodes exon VIIa a 38 encodes amino a 38 amino acid insertionacid into insertion the transactivation into the transactivation domain (TAD) domain [13,14,28]. (TAD) Alternative [13,14,28 splicing]. Alternative of ex- splicing of ons Va and VIIaexons gives Va and rise VIIato three gives well-characterized rise to three well-characterized FOXM1 isoforms FOXM1 (Table isoforms 1): FOXM1a (Table1 ): FOXM1a includes all ten exons, FOXM1b omits alternative exons Va and VIIa, and FOXM1c includes includes all ten exons, FOXM1b omits alternative exons Va and VIIa, and FOXM1c in- alternative exon Va and omits alternative exon VIIa [13,14,28,29]. Notably, functional cludes alternative exon Va and omits alternative exon VIIa [13,14,28,29]. Notably, func- characterizations have shown that FOXM1b and FOXM1c are transcriptionally active while tional characterizations have shown that FOXM1b and FOXM1c are transcriptionally ac- FOXM1a is not [12,14,27,28,31,32]. Additional FOXM1 isoforms have also been reported in tive while FOXM1a is not
Recommended publications
  • Identification of Key Candidate Genes for Colorectal Cancer by Bioinformatics Analysis
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS 18: 6583-6593, 2019 Identification of key candidate genes for colorectal cancer by bioinformatics analysis ZHIHUA CHEN1*, YILIN LIN1*, JI GAO2*, SUYONG LIN1, YAN ZHENG1, YISU LIU1 and SHAO QIN CHEN1 1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University; 2School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350004, P.R. China Received December 27, 2018; Accepted August 16, 2019 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10996 Abstract. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most Introduction common cancers of the digestive tract. Although numerous studies have been conducted to elucidate the cause of CRC, Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third (13.5%) and second the exact mechanism of CRC development remains to be (9.5%) among the incidence of malignancies worldwide determined. To identify candidate genes that may be involved in male and female patients, respectively, and is a serious in CRC development and progression, the microarray datasets hazard to human health (1). Previous studies have demon- GSE41657, GSE77953 and GSE113513 were downloaded from strated that the molecular pathogenesis of CRC is mostly the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Gene Ontology and caused by genetic mutations (2,3). Numerous studies over Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes were used for the past two decades have reported that genetic mutations functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed are associated with the prognosis and treatment of CRC, and genes (DEGs). A protein-protein interaction network was targeted therapies have been developed (4-7). The progres- constructed, and the hub genes were subjected to module sion of CRC is usually accompanied by the activation of the analysis and identification using Search Tool for the Retrieval KRAS and BRAF genes and the inhibition of the p53 tumour of Interacting Genes/Proteins and Cytoscape.
    [Show full text]
  • NEK2 Antibody (Aa287-299) Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody Catalog # ALS11259
    10320 Camino Santa Fe, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.875.1900 Fax: 858.622.0609 NEK2 Antibody (aa287-299) Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody Catalog # ALS11259 Specification NEK2 Antibody (aa287-299) - Product Information Application IHC Primary Accession P51955 Reactivity Human Host Rabbit Clonality Polyclonal Calculated MW 52kDa KDa NEK2 Antibody (aa287-299) - Additional Information Gene ID 4751 Anti-NEK2 antibody IHC of human testis. Other Names Serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek2, 2.7.11.1, HSPK 21, Never in mitosis NEK2 Antibody (aa287-299) - Background A-related kinase 2, NimA-related protein kinase 2, NimA-like protein kinase 1, NEK2, Protein kinase which is involved in the control NEK2A, NLK1 of centrosome separation and bipolar spindle formation in mitotic cells and chromatin Target/Specificity condensation in meiotic cells. Regulates aa 287-299 of Human NEK2 protein. centrosome separation (essential for the formation of bipolar spindles and high-fidelity Reconstitution & Storage chromosome separation) by phosphorylating Store vial at -20 C prior to opening. Dilute centrosomal proteins such as CROCC, CEP250 only prior to immediate use. For extended and NINL, resulting in their displacement from storage aliquot contents and freeze at -20 C or below. Avoid cycles of freezing and the centrosomes. Regulates kinetochore thawing. microtubule attachment stability in mitosis via phosphorylation of NDC80. Involved in Precautions regulation of mitotic checkpoint protein NEK2 Antibody (aa287-299) is for research complex via phosphorylation of CDC20 and use only and not for use in diagnostic or MAD2L1. Plays an active role in chromatin therapeutic procedures. condensation during the first meiotic division through phosphorylation of HMGA2.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation and Characterization of a Gene Trap and Conditional Lin9
    The Role of LIN9 in Mouse Development Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Nina Reichert aus Marburg an der Lahn Würzburg, 2008 Eingereicht am: ............................................................................................ Mitglieder der Promotionskommission: Vorsitzender: 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Stefan Gaubatz 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Thomas Brand Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: ............................................................................................ Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am: ............................................................................................ Für meine Familie & Oliver Content I 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Cell Cycle & its Regulators ...................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Mammalian Cell Cycle .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Cyclins & CDKs ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.1.3 pRB/E2F Pathway .................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 pRB/E2F Complexes in Model Organisms ...........................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • FOX) Proteins in Osteosarcoma Wentao Zhang1*, Ning Duan1*, Tao Song1, Zhong Li1, Caiguo Zhang2, Xun Chen1
    Journal of Cancer 2017, Vol. 8 1619 Ivyspring International Publisher Journal of Cancer 2017; 8(9): 1619-1628. doi: 10.7150/jca.18778 Review The Emerging Roles of Forkhead Box (FOX) Proteins in Osteosarcoma Wentao Zhang1*, Ning Duan1*, Tao Song1, Zhong Li1, Caiguo Zhang2, Xun Chen1 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Xi'an Hong-Hui Hospital affiliated to medical college of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710054; 2. Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. * These authors contributed equally to this work. Corresponding authors: [email protected]; [email protected] © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. Received: 2016.12.15; Accepted: 2017.02.27; Published: 2017.06.03 Abstract Osteosarcoma is the most common bone cancer primarily occurring in children and young adults. Over the past few years, the deregulation of a superfamily transcription factors, known as forkhead box (FOX) proteins, has been demonstrated to contribute to the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma. Molecular mechanism studies have demonstrated that FOX family proteins participate in a variety of signaling pathways and that their expression can be regulated by multiple factors. The dysfunction of FOX genes can alter osteosarcoma cell differentiation, metastasis and progression. In this review, we summarized the evidence that FOX genes play direct or indirect roles in the development and progression of osteosarcoma, and evaluated the emerging role of FOX proteins as targets for therapeutic intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Network of Forkhead Gene Family in Development of Brown Planthoppers
    biology Article The Genetic Network of Forkhead Gene Family in Development of Brown Planthoppers Hai-Yan Lin 1,2, Cheng-Qi Zhu 1,2, Hou-Hong Zhang 2, Zhi-Cheng Shen 2, Chuan-Xi Zhang 2,3 and Yu-Xuan Ye 1,2,* 1 The Rural Development Academy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; [email protected] (H.-Y.L.); [email protected] (C.-Q.Z.) 2 Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; [email protected] (H.-H.Z.); [email protected] (Z.-C.S.); [email protected] (C.-X.Z.) 3 State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Forkhead (Fox) genes encode a family of transcription factors defined by a ‘winged helix’ DNA-binding domain and play important roles in regulating the expression of genes involved in cell growth, proliferation, differentiation and longevity. However, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of the Fox gene family in animals. Here, we take an integrated study, which combines genomics, transcriptomics and phenomics, to construct the Fox gene genetic network in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, a major rice pest. We show that FoxG, FoxQ, FoxA, FoxN1, FoxN2 and their potential target genes are indispensable for embryogenesis; FoxC, FoxJ1 and FoxP have complementary effects on late embryogenesis; FoxA, FoxNl and FoxQ are pleiotropism and also essential for nymph molting; FoxT belongs to a novel insect-specific Fox subfamily; and FoxL2 and FoxO are involved in the development of eggshells and wings, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting FOXM1-Mediated Gene Regulation Through the Analysis of Genome-Wide FOXM1 Binding Sites in MCF-7, K562, SK-N-SH, GM12878 and ECC-1 Cell Lines
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Predicting FOXM1-Mediated Gene Regulation through the Analysis of Genome-Wide FOXM1 Binding Sites in MCF-7, K562, SK-N-SH, GM12878 and ECC-1 Cell Lines 1, , 2, 1 3,4 Keunsoo Kang * y, Yoonjung Choi y, Hoo Hyun Kim , Kyung Hyun Yoo and Sungryul Yu 5,* 1 Department of Microbiology, College of Science & Technology, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea; [email protected] 2 Deargen Inc., Daejeon 34051, Korea; [email protected] 3 Laboratory of Biomedical Genomics, Department of Biological Sciences, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea; [email protected] 4 Research Institute of Women’s Health, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea 5 Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Semyung University, Jecheon 27136, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (S.Y.); Tel.: +82-41-550-3456 (K.K.); +82-43-649-1418 (S.Y.) These authors contributed equally to the work. y Received: 22 June 2020; Accepted: 24 August 2020; Published: 26 August 2020 Abstract: Forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) is a key transcription factor (TF) that regulates a common set of genes related to the cell cycle in various cell types. However, the mechanism by which FOXM1 controls the common gene set in different cellular contexts is unclear. In this study, a comprehensive meta-analysis of genome-wide FOXM1 binding sites in ECC-1, GM12878, K562, MCF-7, and SK-N-SH cell lines was conducted to predict FOXM1-driven gene regulation. Consistent with previous studies, different TF binding motifs were identified at FOXM1 binding sites, while the NFY binding motif was found at 81% of common FOXM1 binding sites in promoters of cell cycle-related genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Carcinogenic Glucosinolates in Cruciferous Vegetables and Their Antagonistic Effects on Prevention of Cancers
    molecules Review Anti-Carcinogenic Glucosinolates in Cruciferous Vegetables and Their Antagonistic Effects on Prevention of Cancers Prabhakaran Soundararajan and Jung Sun Kim * Genomics Division, Department of Agricultural Bio-Resources, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Wansan-gu, Jeonju 54874, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editor: Gautam Sethi Received: 15 October 2018; Accepted: 13 November 2018; Published: 15 November 2018 Abstract: Glucosinolates (GSL) are naturally occurring β-D-thioglucosides found across the cruciferous vegetables. Core structure formation and side-chain modifications lead to the synthesis of more than 200 types of GSLs in Brassicaceae. Isothiocyanates (ITCs) are chemoprotectives produced as the hydrolyzed product of GSLs by enzyme myrosinase. Benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC), phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) and sulforaphane ([1-isothioyanato-4-(methyl-sulfinyl) butane], SFN) are potential ITCs with efficient therapeutic properties. Beneficial role of BITC, PEITC and SFN was widely studied against various cancers such as breast, brain, blood, bone, colon, gastric, liver, lung, oral, pancreatic, prostate and so forth. Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) is a key transcription factor limits the tumor progression. Induction of ARE (antioxidant responsive element) and ROS (reactive oxygen species) mediated pathway by Nrf2 controls the activity of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB). NF-κB has a double edged role in the immune system. NF-κB induced during inflammatory is essential for an acute immune process. Meanwhile, hyper activation of NF-κB transcription factors was witnessed in the tumor cells. Antagonistic activity of BITC, PEITC and SFN against cancer was related with the direct/indirect interaction with Nrf2 and NF-κB protein.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forkhead-Box Family of Transcription Factors: Key Molecular Players in Colorectal Cancer Pathogenesis Paul Laissue
    Laissue Molecular Cancer (2019) 18:5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0938-x REVIEW Open Access The forkhead-box family of transcription factors: key molecular players in colorectal cancer pathogenesis Paul Laissue Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly occurring cancer worldwide and the fourth most frequent cause of death having an oncological origin. It has been found that transcription factors (TF) dysregulation, leading to the significant expression modifications of genes, is a widely distributed phenomenon regarding human malignant neoplasias. These changes are key determinants regarding tumour’s behaviour as they contribute to cell differentiation/proliferation, migration and metastasis, as well as resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. The forkhead box (FOX) transcription factor family consists of an evolutionarily conserved group of transcriptional regulators engaged in numerous functions during development and adult life. Their dysfunction has been associated with human diseases. Several FOX gene subgroup transcriptional disturbances, affecting numerous complex molecular cascades, have been linked to a wide range of cancer types highlighting their potential usefulness as molecular biomarkers. At least 14 FOX subgroups have been related to CRC pathogenesis, thereby underlining their role for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment purposes. This manuscript aims to provide, for the first time, a comprehensive review of FOX genes’ roles during CRC pathogenesis. The molecular and functional characteristics of most relevant FOX molecules (FOXO, FOXM1, FOXP3) have been described within the context of CRC biology, including their usefulness regarding diagnosis and prognosis. Potential CRC therapeutics (including genome-editing approaches) involving FOX regulation have also been included. Taken together, the information provided here should enable a better understanding of FOX genes’ function in CRC pathogenesis for basic science researchers and clinicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Activation of AKT/AP1/Foxm1 Signaling Confers Sorafenib Resistance to Liver Cancer Cells
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS 42: 785-796, 2019 Activation of AKT/AP1/FoxM1 signaling confers sorafenib resistance to liver cancer cells DONGJING YAN1*, XIAOJING YAN2*, XUFANG DAI3,4*, LINGXI CHEN2, LIANGBO SUN2, TAO LI2, FENGTIAN HE2, JIQIN LIAN2 and WANGWEI CAI1 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hainan Medical College, Haikou, Hainan 571199; 2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038; 3Department of Educational Science College, Chongqing Normal University; 4Chongqing Key Laboratory of Psychological Diagnosis and Educational Technology for Children with Special Needs, Chongqing 400047, P.R. China Received December 5, 2018; Accepted June 6, 2019 DOI: 10.3892/or.2019.7192 Abstract. Sorafenib is the first‑line drug used in the treatment the AKT/AP1/FoxM1 signaling axis is an important determi- of liver cancer; however, drug resistance seriously limits the nant of sorafenib tolerance. clinical response to sorafenib. The present study investigated the molecular mechanisms of sorafenib resistance in liver Introduction cancer cells. The data indicated that forkhead box M1 (FoxM1) was significantly overexpressed in sorafenib‑resistant cells, at Liver cancer, the most common primary liver tumor, is the third the mRNA and protein levels. Knockdown of FoxM1 rendered leading cause of cancer mortality globally (1). Surgical resec- drug‑tolerant cells sensitive to sorafenib. Furthermore, FoxM1 tion, thermal ablation and liver transplantation are the current was upregulated at the transcriptional
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Genome Sequencing in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa Reveals Pathogenic DNA Structural Changes and NEK2 As a New Disease Gene
    Whole genome sequencing in patients with retinitis pigmentosa reveals pathogenic DNA structural changes and NEK2 as a new disease gene Koji M. Nishiguchia,b, Richard G. Tearlec, Yangfan P. Liud, Edwin C. Ohd,e, Noriko Miyakef, Paola Benaglioa, Shyana Harperg, Hanna Koskiniemi-Kuendiga, Giulia Venturinia, Dror Sharonh, Robert K. Koenekoopi, Makoto Nakamurab, Mineo Kondob, Shinji Uenob, Tetsuhiro R. Yasumab, Jacques S. Beckmanna,j,k, Shiro Ikegawal, Naomichi Matsumotof, Hiroko Terasakib, Eliot L. Bersong, Nicholas Katsanisd, and Carlo Rivoltaa,1 aDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; bDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan; cComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, CA 94043; dCenter for Human Disease Modeling and eDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710; fDepartment of Human Genetics, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; gBerman-Gund Laboratory for the Study of Retinal Degenerations, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114; hDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel; iMcGill Ocular Genetics Laboratory, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada H3H 1P3; jService of Medical Genetics, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; kSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; and lLaboratory for Bone and Joint Diseases, Center for Genomic Medicine, RIKEN,
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE LEGENDS Supplemental Figure S1. RBPJ
    Xie et al. SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE LEGENDS Supplemental Figure S1. RBPJ correlates with BTIC marker expression. A-D. The TCGA GBM dataset was downloaded and correlations analyzed by R. RBPJ mRNA levels were highly correlated with (A) Olig2, (B) Sox2, (C) CD133, and (D) Sox4 levels. E. RBPJ is preferentially expressed in proneural glioblastomas. The glioblastoma TCGA dataset was interrogated for RBPJ mRNA expression segregated by transcriptional profile. The proneural tumors were further divided into G-CIMP (glioma CpG-island methylator phenotype) or non-G-CIMP. **, p < 0.01. ****, p < 0.0001. *****, p < 0.00001. Supplemental Figure S2. Targeting RBPJ induces BTIC apoptosis. A. 3691 BTICs were transduced with shCONT, shRBPJ-1, or shRBPJ-2. Lysates were prepared and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. shRNA-mediated knockdown of RBPJ was associated with increased cleaved (activated) PARP. B. 3691 BTICs were transduced with shCONT, shRBPJ-1, or shRBPJ-2. Apoptosis measured by Annexin V staining. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (two- way ANOVA; **, p < 0.01; n = 3). Supplemental Figure S3. Targeting RBPJ does not affect non-BTIC proliferation. Non-BTICs (Top, 3691; Bottom, 4121) were transduced with shCONT, shRBPJ-1, or shRBPJ-2. Cell proliferation was measured by CellTiter-Glo. 42 Xie et al. Supplemental Figure S4. RBPJ induces transcriptional profiles in BTICs distinct from Notch activation. A. In parallel experiments, 3691 BTICs were either treated with DAPT (at either 5 μM or 10 μM) vs. vehicle control (DMSO) or transduced with shRBPJ vs. shCONT. RNA-Seq was performed and the results displayed as a heat map with normalization to the relevant control.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Discovery of an Evolutionarily Programmed Modality for Small-Molecule Targeting of an Intractable Protein Surface
    Genomic discovery of an evolutionarily programmed modality for small-molecule targeting of an intractable protein surface Uddhav K. Shigdela,1,2, Seung-Joo Leea,1,3, Mathew E. Sowaa,1,4, Brian R. Bowmana,1,5, Keith Robisona,6, Minyun Zhoua,7, Khian Hong Puaa,8, Dylan T. Stilesa,6, Joshua A. V. Blodgetta,9, Daniel W. Udwarya,10, Andrew T. Rajczewskia,11, Alan S. Manna,12, Siavash Mostafavia,13, Tara Hardyb, Sukrat Aryab,14, Zhigang Wenga,15, Michelle Stewarta,16, Kyle Kenyona,6, Jay P. Morgensterna,6, Ende Pana,17, Daniel C. Graya,6, Roy M. Pollocka,4, Andrew M. Fryb, Richard D. Klausnerc,18, Sharon A. Townsona,19, and Gregory L. Verdinea,d,e,f,2,18,20 Contributed by Richard D. Klausner, April 21, 2020 (sent for review April 8, 2020; reviewed by Chuan He and Ben Shen) The vast majority of intracellular protein targets are refractory toward small-molecule therapeutic engagement, and additional Author contributions: U.K.S., S.-J.L., M.E.S., B.R.B., K.R., Z.W., M.S., D.C.G., R.M.P., A.M.F., R.D.K., S.A.T., and G.L.V. designed research; U.K.S., S.-J.L., M.E.S., K.R., M.Z., K.H.P., D.T.S., therapeutic modalities are needed to overcome this deficiency. J.A.V.B., D.W.U., A.T.R., A.S.M., S.M., T.H., S.A., K.K., J.P.M., E.P., R.D.K., and G.L.V. performed Here, the identification and characterization of a natural product, research; M.E.S., D.T.S., and A.M.F.
    [Show full text]