FOXM1 Is a Transcriptional Target of Erα and Has a Critical Role in Breast

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FOXM1 Is a Transcriptional Target of Erα and Has a Critical Role in Breast Oncogene (2010) 29, 2983–2995 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/10 $32.00 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE FOXM1 is a transcriptional target of ERa and has a critical role in breast cancer endocrine sensitivity and resistance J Millour1, D Constantinidou1, AV Stavropoulou1, MSC Wilson1, SS Myatt1, JM-M Kwok1, K Sivanandan1, RC Coombes1, RH Medema2, J Hartman3, AE Lykkesfeldt4 and EW-F Lam1 1Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; 2Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 3Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden and 4Department of Breast Cancer Research, Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark In this study, we investigated the regulation of FOXM1 Introduction expression by estrogen receptor a (ERa) and its role in hormonal therapy and endocrine resistance. FOXM1 Breast cancer is the second most prevalent cause of protein and mRNA expression was regulated by ER- cancer death in the western hemisphere and displays a ligands, including estrogen, tamoxifen (OHT) and fulves- complex aeitology. The forkhead box (FOX) family trant (ICI182780; ICI) in breast carcinoma cell lines. member FOXM1 was previously reported to be elevated Depletion of ERa by RNA interference (RNAi) in MCF-7 in breast cancer as well as in carcinomas of other origins cells downregulated FOXM1 expression. Reporter gene (Pilarsky et al., 2004). FOXM1 is expressed in prolifer- assays showed that ERa activates FOXM1 transcription ating adult tissues and in response to injury or repair through an estrogen-response element (ERE) located (Korver et al., 1997a, b; Ye et al., 1999; Leung et al., within the proximal promoter region. The direct binding 2001; Wang et al., 2002). FOXM1 has a critical role in of ERa to the FOXM1 promoter was confirmed in vitro by cell cycle progression; expression of FOXM1 increases mobility shift and DNA pull-down assays and in vivo at G1 to S phase transition, and reaches maximal levels by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis. Our in G2 to M phase, promoting M phase entry (Leung data also revealed that upon OHT treatment ERa recruits et al., 2001; Laoukili et al., 2005). FOXM1 controls the histone deacetylases to the ERE site of the FOXM1 expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins, such as promoter, which is associated with a decrease in histone cyclin B1 and cyclin D1 (Leung et al., 2001; Wang et al., acetylation and transcription activity. Importantly, silen- 2001; Laoukili et al., 2005), in addition to genes essential cing of FOXM1 by RNAi abolished estrogen-induced for faithful chromosome segregation and mitosis, such MCF-7 cell proliferation and overcame acquired tamox- as Nek-2, KIF20A, Cdc25B, Aurora B kinase, Survivin, ifen resistance. Conversely, ectopic expression of FOXM1 centromere protein A (CENPA) and CENPB (Wang abrogated the cell cycle arrest mediated by the anti- et al., 2005). Thus, knockdown of FOXM1 with siRNA estrogen OHT. OHT repressed FOXM1 expression in results in delay in G2 and mitotic spindle defects, and endocrine sensitive but not resistant breast carcinoma cell induces mitotic catastrophe. lines. Furthermore, qRT–PCR analysis of breast cancer Previous work has shown that FOXM1 regulates ERa patient samples revealed that there was a strong and expression in breast cancer cell lines (Madureira et al., significant positive correlation between ERa and FOXM1 2006). Consistently, expression of the FOXM1 target mRNA expression. Collectively, these results show cyclin D1 is associated with ERa positivity in breast FOXM1 to be a key mediator of the mitogenic functions cancer (Butt et al., 2005). The strong correlation of ERa and estrogen in breast cancer cells, and also between the expression patterns of ERa and FOXM1 suggest that the deregulation of FOXM1 may contribute in breast cancer cells also suggested the possibility that to anti-estrogen insensitivity. FOXM1 could be an ERa-regulated gene (Madureira Oncogene (2010) 29, 2983–2995; doi:10.1038/onc.2010.47; et al., 2006). Consistent with this hypothesis, a cDNA published online 8 March 2010 microarray also identified FOXM1 as one of 344 estrogen-responsive genes in breast cancer cells (Cica- Keywords: breast cancer; forkhead; estrogen receptor; tiello et al., 2004). Estrogen is generally considered to be FOXM1; endocrine resistance; transcription mitogenic (Brunner et al., 1989), and exerts its action in the mammary epithelial cells primarily via ERa (Ali and Coombes, 2002). The expression of ERa is a good prognostic factor in breast cancer, as about two-thirds Correspondence: Professor EW-F Lam, CR-UK labs and Department of ERa-positive patients respond to treatment with anti- of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith estrogens such as OHT, ICI or aromatase inhibitors Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK. E-mail: [email protected] (Osborne and McGuire, 1979; Gapinski and Donegan, Received 6 July 2009; revised 22 January 2010; accepted 29 January 1980; Elkak and Mokbel, 2001). Treatment of breast 2010; published online 8 March 2010 cancer cells with anti-estrogens results in cell cycle arrest ERa regulates FOXM1 expression in breast cancer J Millour et al 2984 at the G1/S phase and in some cases, cell death (WT-Trident), or its truncation mutants HindIII (Lykkesfeldt et al., 1986). However, approximately half (1.4 kb), and ApaI (300 bp) (Figure 2a). We observed a of the patients who initially respond to hormonal twofold increase of the WT-Trident FOXM1-luc activity therapy develop resistance and relapse, following long- after E2 treatment, and this induction by E2 was term treatment (Ali and Coombes, 2002; Goss et al., repressed in the presence of OHT (Figure 2a). The 2008; Yamashita, 2008). Our previous observation that highest increase (2.7-fold) by E2 was observed for the ERa-positive breast cancer cell lines express higher ApaI-luc activity (Figure 2a). The HindIII-luc activity levels of FOXM1 protein (Madureira et al., 2006) led us was upregulated to a lesser extent (1.5-fold) by E2 to hypothesize that FOXM1 expression is also regulated (Figure 2a). The response of the FOXM1 promoter to by ERa. In an effort to elucidate the mechanisms of ERa was further verified by co-transfection of COS-1 anti-estrogen action and resistance to endocrine therapy, cells with titrated amounts of pHEG0 and the WT- we investigated the regulation of FOXM1 by ERa and Trident-luc or ApaI-luc reporter plasmids (Figure 2a). its role in endocrine sensitivity and resistance in breast Both the WT-Trident and ApaI promoters were induced cancer cells. in a dose-dependent manner by increasing amounts of ERa in the presence of E2 (Figure 2a). It is notable that the control pS2 promoter showed maximum E2- stimulation with very low levels of ERa expression, Results supporting the notion that pS2 may be one of the most E2-sensitive genes (Masiakowski et al., 1982). Collec- ERa ligands modulate the expression of FOXM1 protein tively, these results indicate that the ApaI truncation is and mRNA levels the minimal proximal FOXM1 promoter responsive to To investigate whether the FOXM1 protein and mRNA ERa, consistent with a previous study identifying a levels are regulated by ERa, the ERa-positive breast similar region of the FOXM1 promoter that responds to cancer cell lines ZR-75-1 and MCF-7 and ERa-negative serum stimulation (Korver et al., 1997a). line MDA-MB-231 were treated with the ERa ligands E2, OHT and ICI for the times indicated and harvested for western blotting and qRT–PCR analysis. Treatment The ERE-like element at À45 bp of the FOXM1 promoter of estrogen-starved ZR-75-1 and MCF-7 cells with E2 confers responsiveness to ERa ligands enhanced the expression of FOXM1 protein and mRNA Analysis using the Transcription Element Search System (Figure 1). Within 8 h of E2 treatment, FOXM1 protein (TESS,http://www.cbil. upenn.edu/cgi-bin/tess/tess) and mRNA levels peaked and remained high for at least (Schug, 2008) revealed an ERE-like element (Bourdeau 48 h. By contrast, E2 treatment did not cause significant et al., 2004) located at À45 bp from the transcription changes in either FOXM1 protein or mRNA levels in start site. We next focused our studies on the character- the ERa-negative control MDA–MB-231 cells. Treat- ization of the ERE-like element at À45 bp in the ApaI ment of both the ZR-75-1 and MCF-7 cells with the promoter fragment and introduced point mutations partial antagonist OHT resulted in a reduction in using site-directed mutagenesis by base-substitution in FOXM1 protein levels that was noticeable within 4 h, both arms of the ERE-like palindrome of the ApaI reaching minimal levels within 24 h post-treatment. Yet truncation (Bourdeau et al., 2004) (Figure 2b). For again, treatment with OHT had little effect on the comparison, a single point mutation that does not expression of FOXM1 protein and mRNA in MDA- grossly disrupt the ERE-consensus was also introduced MB-231 cells. Similar to OHT, incubation with the pure in one arm of the ERE-like element in mERE1 antagonist ICI, which causes the degradation of ERa, (Figure 2b). The activity of the wild-type as well as the resulted in a reduction in the FOXM1 expression, with mutated ApaI-luc constructs mERE1, mERE3 and both the protein and mRNA levels completely vanished mERE4 was examined by co-transfection assays in within 24 h post-treatment. We also studied the ability COS-1 cells with and without pHEG0, in the presence or of OHT or ICI to antagonize E2-regulated FOXM1 absence of E2 (Figure 2b). The results showed that the upregulation, and the result showed that the effects of mERE1-luc construct showed similar responsiveness to OHT or ICI following E2 stimulation are similar to ERa and E2 induction as the wild-type ApaI-luc.
Recommended publications
  • CDC25B Mediates Rapamycin-Induced Oncogenic Responses in Cancer Cells
    Published OnlineFirst March 10, 2009; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3222 Research Article CDC25B Mediates Rapamycin-Induced Oncogenic Responses in Cancer Cells Run-qiang Chen,1 Qing-kai Yang,1 Bing-wen Lu,2 Wei Yi,1 Greg Cantin,2 Yan-ling Chen,1 Colleen Fearns,3 John R. Yates III,2 and Jiing-Dwan Lee1 Departments of 1Immunology and Microbial Science, 2Chemical Physiology, and 3Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California Abstract expression of PTEN, increased PI3K activity, and increased expression or activation of AKT in advanced prostate cancer Because the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway (8–10). These aberrations also are indicators of a poor prognosis is commonly deregulated in human cancer, mTOR inhibitors, for prostate cancer patients (11, 12). More importantly, long-term rapamycin and its derivatives, are being actively tested in androgen deprivation treatment for prostate cancer patients that cancer clinical trials. Clinical updates indicate that the reinforces the PI3K/AKT pathway also up-regulates mTOR anticancer effect of these drugs is limited, perhaps due to activation in prostate tumor (9, 10). These abovementioned rapamycin-dependent induction of oncogenic cascades by an experimental and clinical data lead to the supposition that mTOR as yet unclear mechanism. As such, we investigated rapamy- inhibitors (rapamycin and its derivatives) should be effective in cin-dependent phosphoproteomics and discovered that 250 treating human cancer. Unfortunately, recent clinical data indicates phosphosites in 161 cellular proteins were sensitive to that rapamycin shows therapeutic potential in only few types of rapamycin. Among these, rapamycin regulated four kinases human cancer: endometrial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and and four phosphatases.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting FOXM1-Mediated Gene Regulation Through the Analysis of Genome-Wide FOXM1 Binding Sites in MCF-7, K562, SK-N-SH, GM12878 and ECC-1 Cell Lines
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Predicting FOXM1-Mediated Gene Regulation through the Analysis of Genome-Wide FOXM1 Binding Sites in MCF-7, K562, SK-N-SH, GM12878 and ECC-1 Cell Lines 1, , 2, 1 3,4 Keunsoo Kang * y, Yoonjung Choi y, Hoo Hyun Kim , Kyung Hyun Yoo and Sungryul Yu 5,* 1 Department of Microbiology, College of Science & Technology, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea; [email protected] 2 Deargen Inc., Daejeon 34051, Korea; [email protected] 3 Laboratory of Biomedical Genomics, Department of Biological Sciences, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea; [email protected] 4 Research Institute of Women’s Health, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea 5 Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Semyung University, Jecheon 27136, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (S.Y.); Tel.: +82-41-550-3456 (K.K.); +82-43-649-1418 (S.Y.) These authors contributed equally to the work. y Received: 22 June 2020; Accepted: 24 August 2020; Published: 26 August 2020 Abstract: Forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) is a key transcription factor (TF) that regulates a common set of genes related to the cell cycle in various cell types. However, the mechanism by which FOXM1 controls the common gene set in different cellular contexts is unclear. In this study, a comprehensive meta-analysis of genome-wide FOXM1 binding sites in ECC-1, GM12878, K562, MCF-7, and SK-N-SH cell lines was conducted to predict FOXM1-driven gene regulation. Consistent with previous studies, different TF binding motifs were identified at FOXM1 binding sites, while the NFY binding motif was found at 81% of common FOXM1 binding sites in promoters of cell cycle-related genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioinformatics-Based Screening of Key Genes for Transformation of Liver
    Jiang et al. J Transl Med (2020) 18:40 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02229-8 Journal of Translational Medicine RESEARCH Open Access Bioinformatics-based screening of key genes for transformation of liver cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma Chen Hao Jiang1,2, Xin Yuan1,2, Jiang Fen Li1,2, Yu Fang Xie1,2, An Zhi Zhang1,2, Xue Li Wang1,2, Lan Yang1,2, Chun Xia Liu1,2, Wei Hua Liang1,2, Li Juan Pang1,2, Hong Zou1,2, Xiao Bin Cui1,2, Xi Hua Shen1,2, Yan Qi1,2, Jin Fang Jiang1,2, Wen Yi Gu4, Feng Li1,2,3 and Jian Ming Hu1,2* Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver tumour, and is closely related to liver cirrhosis. Previous studies have focussed on the pathogenesis of liver cirrhosis developing into HCC, but the molecular mechanism remains unclear. The aims of the present study were to identify key genes related to the transformation of cirrhosis into HCC, and explore the associated molecular mechanisms. Methods: GSE89377, GSE17548, GSE63898 and GSE54236 mRNA microarray datasets from Gene Expression Omni- bus (GEO) were analysed to obtain diferentially expressed genes (DEGs) between HCC and liver cirrhosis tissues, and network analysis of protein–protein interactions (PPIs) was carried out. String and Cytoscape were used to analyse modules and identify hub genes, Kaplan–Meier Plotter and Oncomine databases were used to explore relationships between hub genes and disease occurrence, development and prognosis of HCC, and the molecular mechanism of the main hub gene was probed using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes(KEGG) pathway analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Activation of AKT/AP1/Foxm1 Signaling Confers Sorafenib Resistance to Liver Cancer Cells
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS 42: 785-796, 2019 Activation of AKT/AP1/FoxM1 signaling confers sorafenib resistance to liver cancer cells DONGJING YAN1*, XIAOJING YAN2*, XUFANG DAI3,4*, LINGXI CHEN2, LIANGBO SUN2, TAO LI2, FENGTIAN HE2, JIQIN LIAN2 and WANGWEI CAI1 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hainan Medical College, Haikou, Hainan 571199; 2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038; 3Department of Educational Science College, Chongqing Normal University; 4Chongqing Key Laboratory of Psychological Diagnosis and Educational Technology for Children with Special Needs, Chongqing 400047, P.R. China Received December 5, 2018; Accepted June 6, 2019 DOI: 10.3892/or.2019.7192 Abstract. Sorafenib is the first‑line drug used in the treatment the AKT/AP1/FoxM1 signaling axis is an important determi- of liver cancer; however, drug resistance seriously limits the nant of sorafenib tolerance. clinical response to sorafenib. The present study investigated the molecular mechanisms of sorafenib resistance in liver Introduction cancer cells. The data indicated that forkhead box M1 (FoxM1) was significantly overexpressed in sorafenib‑resistant cells, at Liver cancer, the most common primary liver tumor, is the third the mRNA and protein levels. Knockdown of FoxM1 rendered leading cause of cancer mortality globally (1). Surgical resec- drug‑tolerant cells sensitive to sorafenib. Furthermore, FoxM1 tion, thermal ablation and liver transplantation are the current was upregulated at the transcriptional
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE LEGENDS Supplemental Figure S1. RBPJ
    Xie et al. SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE LEGENDS Supplemental Figure S1. RBPJ correlates with BTIC marker expression. A-D. The TCGA GBM dataset was downloaded and correlations analyzed by R. RBPJ mRNA levels were highly correlated with (A) Olig2, (B) Sox2, (C) CD133, and (D) Sox4 levels. E. RBPJ is preferentially expressed in proneural glioblastomas. The glioblastoma TCGA dataset was interrogated for RBPJ mRNA expression segregated by transcriptional profile. The proneural tumors were further divided into G-CIMP (glioma CpG-island methylator phenotype) or non-G-CIMP. **, p < 0.01. ****, p < 0.0001. *****, p < 0.00001. Supplemental Figure S2. Targeting RBPJ induces BTIC apoptosis. A. 3691 BTICs were transduced with shCONT, shRBPJ-1, or shRBPJ-2. Lysates were prepared and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. shRNA-mediated knockdown of RBPJ was associated with increased cleaved (activated) PARP. B. 3691 BTICs were transduced with shCONT, shRBPJ-1, or shRBPJ-2. Apoptosis measured by Annexin V staining. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (two- way ANOVA; **, p < 0.01; n = 3). Supplemental Figure S3. Targeting RBPJ does not affect non-BTIC proliferation. Non-BTICs (Top, 3691; Bottom, 4121) were transduced with shCONT, shRBPJ-1, or shRBPJ-2. Cell proliferation was measured by CellTiter-Glo. 42 Xie et al. Supplemental Figure S4. RBPJ induces transcriptional profiles in BTICs distinct from Notch activation. A. In parallel experiments, 3691 BTICs were either treated with DAPT (at either 5 μM or 10 μM) vs. vehicle control (DMSO) or transduced with shRBPJ vs. shCONT. RNA-Seq was performed and the results displayed as a heat map with normalization to the relevant control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulatory Roles of Phosphatases in Cancer
    Oncogene (2014) 33, 939–953 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/14 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW The regulatory roles of phosphatases in cancer J Stebbing1, LC Lit1, H Zhang, RS Darrington, O Melaiu, B Rudraraju and G Giamas The relevance of potentially reversible post-translational modifications required for controlling cellular processes in cancer is one of the most thriving arenas of cellular and molecular biology. Any alteration in the balanced equilibrium between kinases and phosphatases may result in development and progression of various diseases, including different types of cancer, though phosphatases are relatively under-studied. Loss of phosphatases such as PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10), a known tumour suppressor, across tumour types lends credence to the development of phosphatidylinositol 3--kinase inhibitors alongside the use of phosphatase expression as a biomarker, though phase 3 trial data are lacking. In this review, we give an updated report on phosphatase dysregulation linked to organ-specific malignancies. Oncogene (2014) 33, 939–953; doi:10.1038/onc.2013.80; published online 18 March 2013 Keywords: cancer; phosphatases; solid tumours GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCIES abs in sera were significantly associated with poor survival in Oesophageal cancer advanced ESCC, suggesting that they may have a clinical utility in Loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on ESCC screening and diagnosis.5 chromosome 10) expression in oesophageal cancer is frequent, Cao et al.6 investigated the role of protein tyrosine phosphatase, among other gene alterations characterizing this disease. Zhou non-receptor type 12 (PTPN12) in ESCC and showed that PTPN12 et al.1 found that overexpression of PTEN suppresses growth and protein expression is higher in normal para-cancerous tissues than induces apoptosis in oesophageal cancer cell lines, through in 20 ESCC tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Alterations of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases in Human Cancers
    Oncogene (2015) 34, 3885–3894 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/15 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Genetic alterations of protein tyrosine phosphatases in human cancers S Zhao1,2,3, D Sedwick3,4 and Z Wang2,3 Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are enzymes that remove phosphate from tyrosine residues in proteins. Recent whole-exome sequencing of human cancer genomes reveals that many PTPs are frequently mutated in a variety of cancers. Among these mutated PTPs, PTP receptor T (PTPRT) appears to be the most frequently mutated PTP in human cancers. Beside PTPN11, which functions as an oncogene in leukemia, genetic and functional studies indicate that most of mutant PTPs are tumor suppressor genes. Identification of the substrates and corresponding kinases of the mutant PTPs may provide novel therapeutic targets for cancers harboring these mutant PTPs. Oncogene (2015) 34, 3885–3894; doi:10.1038/onc.2014.326; published online 29 September 2014 INTRODUCTION tyrosine/threonine-specific phosphatases. (4) Class IV PTPs include Protein tyrosine phosphorylation has a critical role in virtually all four Drosophila Eya homologs (Eya1, Eya2, Eya3 and Eya4), which human cellular processes that are involved in oncogenesis.1 can dephosphorylate both tyrosine and serine residues. Protein tyrosine phosphorylation is coordinately regulated by protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and protein tyrosine phosphatases 1 THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE AND CATALYTIC (PTPs). Although PTKs add phosphate to tyrosine residues in MECHANISM OF PTPS proteins, PTPs remove it. Many PTKs are well-documented oncogenes.1 Recent cancer genomic studies provided compelling The three-dimensional structures of the catalytic domains of evidence that many PTPs function as tumor suppressor genes, classical PTPs (RPTPs and non-RPTPs) are extremely well because a majority of PTP mutations that have been identified in conserved.5 Even the catalytic domain structures of the dual- human cancers are loss-of-function mutations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of FOXM1 in Pancreatic Stem Cells and Carcinogenesis Ming Quan1,3, Peipei Wang2, Jiujie Cui1,3, Yong Gao2 and Keping Xie3*
    Quan et al. Molecular Cancer 2013, 12:159 http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/12/1/159 REVIEW Open Access The roles of FOXM1 in pancreatic stem cells and carcinogenesis Ming Quan1,3, Peipei Wang2, Jiujie Cui1,3, Yong Gao2 and Keping Xie3* Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has one of the poorest prognoses among all cancers. Over the past several decades, investigators have made great advances in the research of PDAC pathogenesis. Importantly, identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells (PCSCs) in pancreatic cancer cases has increased our understanding of PDAC biology and therapy. PCSCs are responsible for pancreatic tumorigenesis and tumor progression via a number of mechanisms, including extensive proliferation, self-renewal, high tumorigenic ability, high propensity for invasiveness and metastasis, and resistance to conventional treatment. Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that PCSCs are involved in the malignant transformation of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. The molecular mechanisms that control PCSCs are related to alterations of various signaling pathways, for instance, Hedgehog, Notch, Wnt, B-cell-specific Moloney murine leukemia virus insertion site 1, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT, and Nodal/Activin. Also, authors have reported that the proliferation-specific transcriptional factor Forkhead box protein M1 is involved in PCSC self-renewal and proliferation. In this review, we describe the current knowledge about the signaling pathways related to PCSCs and the early stages of PDAC development, highlighting the pivotal roles of Forkhead box protein M1 in PCSCs and their impacts on the development and progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Keywords: Transcription factors, Oncogenic switch, Progression, Stem cells, Therapeutic targets, Molecular biomarkers Introduction roles of pancreatic CSCs (PCSCs) in pancreatic cancer de- The incidence of pancreatic cancer is increasing annu- velopment and progression is imperative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cdc25b Phosphatase Is Essential for the G2/M Phase Transition in Human Cells
    Journal of Cell Science 111, 2445-2453 (1998) 2445 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1998 JCS3777 The cdc25B phosphatase is essential for the G2/M phase transition in human cells Christiane Lammer1, Sybille Wagerer1, Rainer Saffrich2, Daniel Mertens1, Wilhelm Ansorge2 and Ingrid Hoffmann1,* 1FS 6 Angewandte Tumorvirologie (F0400), Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 242, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany 2Biochemical Instrumentation Programme, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstr. 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 15 June; published on WWW 30 July 1998 SUMMARY Cdc25 phosphatases play key roles in cell cycle progression cdc25B is activated through phosphorylation during S- by activating cyclin-dependent kinases. In human cells, phase. Using a cell duplication, microinjection assay we cdc25 proteins are encoded by a multigene family, show that ablation of cdc25B function by specific antibodies consisting of cdc25A, cdc25B and cdc25C. While cdc25A blocks cell cycle progression in Hs68 cells by inhibition of plays a crucial role at the G1/S phase transition, cdc25C is entry into mitosis. Cdc25B function neither plays a role in involved in the dephosphorylation and activation of the later stages of mitosis nor for the inititation of DNA mitotic kinase, cdc2/cyclinB. In addition, cdc25C itself is replication. These results indicate that cdc25B is a mitotic regulated by cdc2/cyclinB which then creates a positive regulator that might act as a ‘starter phosphatase’ to feedback loop that controls entry into mitosis. In this study initiate the positive feedback loop at the entry into M phase. we show that the activity of cdc25B appears during late S phase and peaks during G2 phase.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forkhead Transcription Factor FOXM1 Promotes Endocrine
    Bergamaschi et al. Breast Cancer Research 2014, 16:436 http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/16/5/436 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The forkhead transcription factor FOXM1 promotes endocrine resistance and invasiveness in estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer by expansion of stem-like cancer cells Anna Bergamaschi1, Zeynep Madak-Erdogan1, Yu Jin Kim2, Yoon-La Choi2,3, Hailing Lu1,4 and Benita S Katzenellenbogen1* Abstract Introduction: The forkhead transcription factor FOXM1 coordinates expression of cell cycle–related genes and plays a pivotal role in tumorigenesis and cancer progression. We previously showed that FOXM1 acts downstream of 14-3-3ζ signaling, the elevation of which correlates with a more aggressive tumor phenotype. However, the role that FOXM1 might play in engendering resistance to endocrine treatments in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) patients when tumor FOXM1 is high has not been clearly defined yet. Methods: We analyzed FOXM1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry in 501 ER-positive breast cancers. We also mapped genome-wide FOXM1, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 and ERα binding events by chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) in hormone-sensitive and resistant breast cancer cells after tamoxifen treatment. These binding profiles were integrated with gene expression data derived from cells before and after FOXM1 knockdown to highlight specific FOXM1 transcriptional networks. We also modulated the levels of FOXM1 and newly discovered FOXM1-regulated genes and examined their impact on the cancer stem-like cell population and on cell invasiveness and resistance to endocrine treatments. Results: FOXM1 protein expression was high in 20% of the tumors, which correlated with significantly reduced survival in these patients (P = 0.003 by logrank Mantel-Cox test).
    [Show full text]
  • Arylstibonic Acids Are Potent and Isoform-Selective Inhibitors Of
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repository Arylstibonic acids are potent and isoform-selective inhibitors of Cdc25a and Cdc25b phosphatases Lok Hang Mak a,b, Jessica Knott a,b, Katherine A. Scott c,d, Claire Scott e, Gillian F. Whyte a,b, Yu Ye f, David Mann b,c, Oscar Ces a,b, James Stivers f, Rudiger Woscholski a,b,* a Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK b Institute of Chemical Biology, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK c Division of Molecular Biosciences, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK d Drug Discovery Centre, Imperial College London, St Dunstan’s Road, London, W6 8RP, UK e Division of Cell and Molecular Biology, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK f Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205 *Corresponding author: Tel: +44 (0) 2075945305, Email: [email protected] Keywords: Arylstibonic acids, protein tyrosine phosphatase, Cdc25 inhibitor Abstract In this study, a library of arylstibonic acids were screened as potential protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors. Two compounds, namely 13778 and P6949 were identified as potent Cdc25 phosphatase inhibitors, an important key regulator of the eukaryotic cell cycle. These arylstibonic acids were also tested against other members of the protein tyrosine phosphatase family and were found to display good specificity and potency for Cdc25 phosphatases. Introduction Phosphatases are important regulators of many cellular functions, which in turn impact disease and human health.
    [Show full text]
  • FOXM1: a Multifunctional Oncoprotein and Emerging Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer
    cancers Review FOXM1: A Multifunctional Oncoprotein and Emerging Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer Cassie Liu, Carter J. Barger and Adam R. Karpf * Eppley Institute and Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68918-6805, USA; [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (C.J.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-402-559-6115 Simple Summary: Ovarian cancer is a lethal disease in women with a 10-year survival rate of <40% worldwide. A key molecular alteration in ovarian cancer is the aberrant overexpression and activation of the transcription factor forkhead box M1 (FOXM1). FOXM1 regulates the expression of a multitude of genes that promote cancer, including those that increase the growth, survival, and metastatic spread of cancer cells. Importantly, FOXM1 overexpression is a robust biomarker for poor prognosis in pan-cancer and ovarian cancer. In this review, we first discuss the molecular mechanisms controlling FOXM1 expression and activity, with a specific emphasis on ovarian cancer. We then discuss the evidence for and the manner by which FOXM1 expression promotes aggressive cancer biology. Finally, we discuss the clinical utility of FOXM1, including its potential as a cancer biomarker and as a therapeutic target in ovarian cancer. Abstract: Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) is a member of the conserved forkhead box (FOX) transcription factor family. Over the last two decades, FOXM1 has emerged as a multifunctional oncoprotein and a robust biomarker of poor prognosis in many human malignancies. In this review article, we address the current knowledge regarding the mechanisms of regulation and oncogenic functions of FOXM1, Citation: Liu, C.; Barger, C.J.; Karpf, particularly in the context of ovarian cancer.
    [Show full text]