DOCSLIB.ORG

AMD EPYC™ 7371 Processors Accelerating HPC Innovation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AMD EPYC™ 7371 Processors Accelerating HPC Innovation AMD EPYC™ 7371 Processors Solution Brief Accelerating HPC Innovation March, 2019 AMD EPYC 7371 processors (16 core, 3.1GHz): Exceptional Memory Bandwidth AMD EPYC server processors deliver 8 channels of memory with support for up The right choice for HPC to 2TB of memory per processor. Designed from the ground up for a new generation of solutions, AMD EPYC™ 7371 processors (16 core, 3.1GHz) implement a philosophy of Standards Based AMD is committed to industry standards, choice without compromise. The AMD EPYC 7371 processor delivers offering you a choice in x86 processors outstanding frequency for applications sensitive to per-core with design innovations that target the performance such as those licensed on a per-core basis. evolving needs of modern datacenters. No Compromise Product Line Compute requirements are increasing, datacenter space is not. AMD EPYC server processors offer up to 32 cores and a consistent feature set across all processor models. Power HPC Workloads Tackle HPC workloads with leading performance and expandability. AMD EPYC 7371 processors are an excellent option when license costs Accelerate your workloads with up to dominate the overall solution cost. In these scenarios the performance- 33% more PCI Express® Gen 3 lanes. per-dollar of the overall solution is usually best with a CPU that can Optimize Productivity provide excellent per-core performance. Increase productivity with tools, resources, and communities to help you “code faster, faster code.” Boost AMD EPYC processors’ innovative architecture translates to tremendous application performance with Software performance. More importantly, the performance you’re paying for can Optimization Guides and Performance be matched to the appropriate to the performance you need. Tuning Guidelines. I/O intensive workloads can utilize the plentiful I/O bandwidth with the Security in the Datacenter Help safeguard your software and data right number of cores – avoiding overpaying for unneeded power – with the industry’s first x86 processor while compute-intensive workloads can make use of fully loaded core with an embedded security processor. counts, dual sockets and plenty of memory. Partner Ecosystem AMD’s broad partner ecosystem and Expanding the AMD EPYC™ 7001 Series Processor collaborative engineering provide tested and validated solutions that help lower Product Stack your risk and total cost of ownership The addition of the AMD EPYC 7371 processor further completes the AMD EPYC 7001 series processor product stack. This processor fits right in between the AMD EPYC™ 7451 processors (24-core, 2.3GHz) and the AMD EPYC™ 7351 processor (16-core, 2.4GHz). This processor is perfect for those that require excellent per-core memory bandwidth and excellent per-core performance. The AMD EPYC 7371 processor has an 2018 © Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. all-core boost frequency that is 24% higher than the AMD EPYC 7351 processor, all while maintaining the same number of cores, the same memory bandwidth, and the same number of PCIe® Gen3 lanes. Positioning the AMD EPYC 7371 processor (16 core, 3.1GHz) Table 1 shows the full AMD EPYC 7001 series processor product stack. Table 1: The AMD EPYC 7001 Series Processor Product Stack Why AMD EPYC 7371 processor and why now? AMD is constantly listening to customer feedback and reacting to shifts in the market. A need was identified for customers who are after high per-core performance all while retaining the other great features of AMD EPYC processors, such as the excellent memory bandwidth or the excellent I/O scalability. There are many scenarios in which this is important. An example would be an application that is licensed on a per-core basis. In these scenarios, AMD EPYC 7371 processors provide excellent compute performance, while keeping the licensing costs down to help ensure the customer is getting the optimal value for each dollar invested in software licensing. 2019 © Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 2 Performance Benchmarks and Testing Tested Hardware/Software Benchmarks were performed across a wide range configuration of applications and different types of workloads to show the performance benefits of AMD EPYC 7371 Compute Nodes processors. The testing includes examples of CFD, CPUs 2 x AMD EPYC 7351 processors (16- core, 2.4GHz)/ 2 x AMD EPYC 7371 FEA, Weather, and Molecular Dynamics processors (16-core, 3.1GHz) / applications. 2 x AMD EPYC 7451 processors (24- core, 2.3GHz) The purpose of the benchmarks is to show the Memory 256GB (16x 16GB Dual-Rank DDR4- relative performance of different AMD EPYC server 2666 DIMMs) NIC Mellanox ConnectX-5 EDR 100Gb processors to help customers better decide the Infiniband x16 PCIe right choice for their use case. Storage: OS 1 x 256 GB NVMe Storage: Data 1 x 1 TB NVMe Benchmarks were performed across the following Software applications and workloads. OS RHEL 7.5 (3.10.0-862.el7.x86_64) Mellanox MLNX_OFED_LINUX-4.3-3.0.2.1 ® • ANSYS Fluent OFED Driver (OFED-4.3-3.0.2) • WRF MPI Version • Fluent: pmpi-09.01.04.03 • NAMD • WRF: OpenMPI 3.1.3 • ® NAMD: OpenMPI 3.1.1 • LSTC LS-DYNA • LS-DYNA: pmpi-09.01.04.03 • Altair Radioss® • Radioss: l_mpi-rt_2018.3.222 • ESI PAM-CRASH® • PAM-CRASH: pmpi-09.01.04.03 • Star-CCM+: pmpi-09.01.04.03 ® • Siemens PLM Star-CCM+ Application • Fluent: 19.1 • WRF: 3.8.1 • NAMD: 2.13b2 • LS-DYNA: R9 30 • Radioss: 13.3.1 • PAM-CRASH: Pamworld V7.0 • Star-CCM+: 13.06.012 Network Switch Mellanox EDR 100Gb/s Managed Switch (MSB7800-ES2F) Configuration Options BIOS Setting SMT=OFF (SMT=ON for NAMD) Boost=ON SMEE=Disabled SVM=Disabled Global C State Control=Enabled OS Settings Governor=Performance, CC6 Disabled 2019 © Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3 ANSYS FLUENT: AMD EPYC 7371 Processors vs Intel Xeon Gold 6148 Processors Performance was compared across 11 different ANSYS FLUENT benchmarks using AMD EPYC 7371 processor and Intel Xeon Gold 6148 processors (20 core, 2.4GHz). The Intel data was gathered from published results on the ANSYS website 1. We have compared relative system level performance as well as relative per core performance. AMD EPYC 7371 processors deliver an up to 5% average lead in overall system performance across all benchmarks. Even more impressive leads were posted in per-core performance, by up to 49%, with an average of up to 32% across all benchmarks. Per-core performance is critically important to maximize software license investments. Per Core Performance Figure 2 shows the per core performance where AMD EPYC 7371 processors win by a large margin over Intel Xeon Gold 6148 processors. Per core performance is critical in workloads where licensing may be charged on a per core basis. Relative Average Per Core Performance - AMD EPYC 7371 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6148 (performance scaled to Intel Xeon Gold 6148=100% for each benchmark) 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 higher is better) is higher - 0.8 0.6 0.4 Relative Performance per Core Core per Performance Relative (Core Solver Rating Rating Solver (Core 0.2 0 ANSYS Fluent Benchmarks (Release 19 Test Cases) Intel Xeon Gold 6148 processors (20 core, 2.4GHz) AMD EPYC 7371 processors (16 core, 3.1GHz) Figure 1 2019 © Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4 System Level Performance Figures 2 shows the relative system level performance across the ANSYS FLUENT benchmarks. AMD EPYC 7371 processors post an up to 5% average lead in overall system performance across all benchmarks in single node testing. Relative Average System-Level Performance - AMD EPYC 7371 vs. Intel Xeon Gold 6148 (performance scaled to Intel Xeon Gold 6148=100% for each benchmark) 1.4 1.2 1 higher is better) is higher 0.8 - Level Performance Performance Level - 0.6 0.4 Relative System Relative (Core Solver Rating Rating Solver (Core 0.2 0 ANSYS Fluent Benchmarks (Release 19 Test Cases) Intel Xeon Gold 6148 processors (20 core, 2.4GHz) AMD EPYC 7371 processors (16 core, 3.1GHz) Figure 2 2019 © Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 5 AMD EPYC Server Processors: High Frequency vs. Core-Count The following charts show relative performance of the high frequency AMD EPYC 7371 processor vs. two other AMD EPYC server processors across a range of different applications. The AMD EPYC 7351 processor has the same core count of 16 cores. The AMD EPYC 7451 processor has 24 cores. Both processors are lower frequency than the AMD EPYC 7371 processor. Software license pricing strategies require investigation into per-core performance to help ensure the customer is optimizing the software license investment. Higher per-core performance for per-core licensed software yields better performance-per-dollar on the overall solution compared to higher system level performance but having to pay more to license a larger core count system. In contrast, there are applications that do not require licensing. In these scenarios, better overall system level performance would lead to better performance-per-dollar for the overall solution. Each use case is different, and an analysis is recommended to find the right balance between per-core performance and system-level performance. 2019 © Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 6 Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Relative System Level Performance EPYC 7351 vs EPYC 7371 vs EPYC 7451 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 higher better) is - 0.6 0.4 (Mean ratio Relative Relative System Level Performance 0.2 0 conus12 conus2.5 AMD EPYC 7351 processors (16-core, 2.4GHz) AMD EPYC 7371 processors (16 core, 3.1GHz) AMD EPYC 7451 processors (24-core, 2.3GHz) Relative Per Core Performance EPYC 7351 vs EPYC 7371 vs EPYC 7451 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 higher better) is - 0.6 0.4 (Mean ratio Relative Relative Per Core Performance 0.2 0 conus12 conus2.5 AMD EPYC 7351 processors (16-core, 2.4GHz) AMD EPYC 7371 processors (16 core, 3.1GHz) AMD EPYC 7371 processors (16 core, 3.1GHz) 2019 © Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effective Virtual CPU Configuration with QEMU and Libvirt
    Effective Virtual CPU Configuration with QEMU and libvirt Kashyap Chamarthy <[email protected]> Open Source Summit Edinburgh, 2018 1 / 38 Timeline of recent CPU flaws, 2018 (a) Jan 03 • Spectre v1: Bounds Check Bypass Jan 03 • Spectre v2: Branch Target Injection Jan 03 • Meltdown: Rogue Data Cache Load May 21 • Spectre-NG: Speculative Store Bypass Jun 21 • TLBleed: Side-channel attack over shared TLBs 2 / 38 Timeline of recent CPU flaws, 2018 (b) Jun 29 • NetSpectre: Side-channel attack over local network Jul 10 • Spectre-NG: Bounds Check Bypass Store Aug 14 • L1TF: "L1 Terminal Fault" ... • ? 3 / 38 Related talks in the ‘References’ section Out of scope: Internals of various side-channel attacks How to exploit Meltdown & Spectre variants Details of performance implications What this talk is not about 4 / 38 Related talks in the ‘References’ section What this talk is not about Out of scope: Internals of various side-channel attacks How to exploit Meltdown & Spectre variants Details of performance implications 4 / 38 What this talk is not about Out of scope: Internals of various side-channel attacks How to exploit Meltdown & Spectre variants Details of performance implications Related talks in the ‘References’ section 4 / 38 OpenStack, et al. libguestfs Virt Driver (guestfish) libvirtd QMP QMP QEMU QEMU VM1 VM2 Custom Disk1 Disk2 Appliance ioctl() KVM-based virtualization components Linux with KVM 5 / 38 OpenStack, et al. libguestfs Virt Driver (guestfish) libvirtd QMP QMP Custom Appliance KVM-based virtualization components QEMU QEMU VM1 VM2 Disk1 Disk2 ioctl() Linux with KVM 5 / 38 OpenStack, et al. libguestfs Virt Driver (guestfish) Custom Appliance KVM-based virtualization components libvirtd QMP QMP QEMU QEMU VM1 VM2 Disk1 Disk2 ioctl() Linux with KVM 5 / 38 libguestfs (guestfish) Custom Appliance KVM-based virtualization components OpenStack, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • FEA Newsletter October 2011
    October Issue - 11th Anniversary Issue PreSys™ R3 Release BETA CAE Systems S.A. FE Modeling Tool release ANSA v13.2.0 ESI engineer David Prono transatlantic boat race The Stealth LLNL M. King (left) and physicist W. Moss B-2 Spirit compression test helmet pad TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. Table of Contents 4. FEA Information Inc. Announcements 5. Participant & Industry Announcements 6. Participants 7. BETA CAE Systems S.A. announces the release of ANSA v13.2.0 11. Making A Difference Guenter & Margareta Mueller 13. LLNL researchers find way to mitigate traumatic brain injury 16. ESI sponsors in-house engineer David Prono for a transatlantic boat race 18. ETA - PreSys™ R3 Release FE Modeling Tool Now Offers ‘Part Groups’ Function 20. Toyota Collaborative Safety Research Center 23. LSTC SID-IIs-D FAST - Finite Element Model 27. Website Showcase The Snelson Atom 28. New Technology - “Where You At?” 29. SGI - Benchmarks- Top Crunch.org 35. Aerospace - The Stealth 2 36. Reference Library - Available Books 38. Solutions - PrePost Processing - Model Editing 39. Solutions - Software 40. Cloud Services – SGI 42. Cloud Services – Gridcore 43. Global Training Courses 50. FEA - CAE Consulting/Consultants 53. Software Distributors 57. Industry News - MSC.Software 59. Industry News – SGI 60. Industry News - CRAY 3 FEA Information Inc. Announcements Welcome to our 11th Anniversary Issue. A special thanks to a few of our first participant’s that supported, and continue to support FEA Information Inc.: Abe Keisoglou and Cathie Walton, (ETA) US, Brian Walker, Oasys, UK Christian Tanasecu, SGI, Guenter and Margareta Mueller, CADFEM Germany, Sam Saltiel, BETA CAE Systems SA, Greece Companies - JSOL - LSTC With this issue we will be adding new directions, opening participation, and have brought on additional staff.
    [Show full text]
  • ANSYS Contact Technology Guide
    ANSYS Contact Technology Guide ANSYS Release 9.0 002114 November 2004 ANSYS, Inc. is a UL registered ISO 9001: 2000 Company. ANSYS Contact Technology Guide ANSYS Release 9.0 ANSYS, Inc. Southpointe 275 Technology Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317 [email protected] http://www.ansys.com (T) 724-746-3304 (F) 724-514-9494 Copyright and Trademark Information Copyright © 2004 SAS IP, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use, distribution or duplication is prohibited. ANSYS, DesignSpace, CFX, DesignModeler, DesignXplorer, ANSYS Workbench environment, AI*Environment, CADOE and any and all ANSYS, Inc. product names referenced on any media, manual or the like, are registered trademarks or trademarks of subsidiaries of ANSYS, Inc. located in the United States or other countries. ICEM CFD is a trademark licensed by ANSYS, Inc. All other trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners. ANSYS, Inc. is a UL registered ISO 9001: 2000 Company. ANSYS Inc. products may contain U.S. Patent No. 6,055,541. Microsoft, Windows, Windows 2000 and Windows XP are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. Inventor and Mechanical Desktop are registered trademarks of Autodesk, Inc. SolidWorks is a registered trademark of SolidWorks Corporation. Pro/ENGINEER is a registered trademark of Parametric Technology Corporation. Unigraphics, Solid Edge and Parasolid are registered trademarks of Electronic Data Systems Corporation (EDS). ACIS and ACIS Geometric Modeler are registered trademarks of Spatial Technology, Inc. FLEXlm License Manager is a trademark of Macrovision Corporation. This ANSYS, Inc. software product and program documentation is ANSYS Confidential Information and are furnished by ANSYS, Inc. under an ANSYS software license agreement that contains provisions concerning non-disclosure, copying, length and nature of use, warranties, disclaimers and remedies, and other provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ansys, Inc. BUY Company Update : Software
    March 9, 2020 Ansys, Inc. BUY Company Update : Software Let there be light Ansys has announced the acquisition of Lumerical, a privately- held developer of photonic design and simulation tools. The company, based in Vancouver, was founded in 2003. Jay Vleeschhouwer [email protected] Two decades ago, we asked EDA managements about the 646-442-4251 possible or eventual role of photons in computing, and the answer was that it was something to consider but that it was or would be on the horizon (or event horizon, as it were) for some time . They were Stock Symbol NASDAQ: ANSS right but that role now seems much closer to being meaningful Current Price $228.70 or necessary, though it is premature to quantify (or quanta-fy) in 12 mos. Target Price $284.00 terms of revenues, not to mention what will likely have to be a good Market Cap $19,075.7 mln gestation period vis-à-vis duly modifying or updating customers’ Shares O/S 87.0 mln design and engineering processes and techniques (meaning this acquisition is for strategic positioning as the engineering software Avg Daily Vol. (3 mos.) 472,288 shs. market evolves, as it will in this and in other respects). 52-Week Price Low/High $174.25 - $299.06 P/B 6.8x This acquisition fits with Ansys' history of acquiring physics- Price/ FCF 0.5x based software and IP, and will be part of the physics business unit (rather than, for instance, the semiconductor unit) inasmuch Fiscal Year End Dec as photonics will have a role in addressing multiple simulation ROE 19% types and application/end-market uses, i.e., multi-physics to EPS complement existing simulation functions in the portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Raad 5667 Clouds Mill Drive, Alexandria, VA, 22310 | (571) 685-0009 | [email protected]
    Michael Raad 5667 Clouds Mill Drive, Alexandria, VA, 22310 | (571) 685-0009 | [email protected] Education BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING | MECHANICAL ENGINEERING | CLASS OF 2019 Experience Mechanical Engineer Intern | Consolidated Contractors Company (CCC) | June 2018 – July 2018 . Learned various processes and techniques that streamline communication on big scale projects . Worked under the supervision of engineers from different departments, familiarizing me to various engineering tasks such as Design, Procurement, Quality Assurance and Quality Control . Worked on the technical drawings and validated their accordance to many specifications such as the Qatar Constructions Specifications . Represented CCC under Quality Control by supervising technical and safety tests of elevators . Handled work orders with sub-contractors and clients on the site as part of Quality Assurance, working for 60 hours a week under temperatures exceeding 115 Maintenance Engineer | PepsiCo | January 2018 . Oversaw manufacturing processes in a large scale production facility under strict international food safety standards . Supervised maintenance work over heavy machinery . Researched for means to recover heat losses in boiler setups Engineering Intern | BMW | August 2016 . Familiarized through hands-on experience with the different systems in a vehicle . Repaired different mechanisms such as brakes, gearboxes and engine components Projects SAE SUPERMILEAGE . Designed a hyper-efficient single seater vehicle . Carried stress and CFD analysis on the vehicle that were crucial for the development of the project car using Fluent . Reduced the weight of the engine mount by performing optimization techniques using ANSYS . Developed the vehicle’s powertrain and remodeled the carbon fiber monocoque . Negotiated sponsorship proposals with several companies within the education, oil and gas and logistics industries.
    [Show full text]
  • The H1B Records Below List the Companies That Have Submitted the Greatest Number of H1B Visa Petitions for This Location
    The H1B records below list the companies that have submitted the greatest number of H1B visa petitions for this location. This information was gathered directly from Department of Labor (DOL) records, which is the government agency responsible for all H1B submissions. Every quarter, DOL makes available a listing of all companies who have submitted H1B visa applications for the most recent 3 months for which records are available. The records contained in Going Global's H1B Plus database contains the most recent 12-month period of records available. Sort by Company | Petitions MASTECH, INC., A MASTECH HOLDINGS, 4339 INC. COMPANY MASTECH RESOURCING, INC. 1393 MASTECH ALLIANCE, INC., A MASTECH 1040 HOLDINGS COMPANY NESS USA, INC. 693 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 169 UHCP D/B/A UPMC MEP 144 COGENT INFOTECH CORPORATION 131 SDLC MANAGEMENT, INC. 123 FIRST CONSULTING GROUP, LLC 104 ANSYS, INC. 100 COMPUTER ENTERPRISES, INC. 97 CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY 96 INTELLECT DESIGN ARENA INC. 95 ACCION LABS US, INC. 63 HM HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC. 57 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS 44 H.J. HEINZ COMPANY 40 CV CONSULTING INC 36 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 36 INFOYUGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 36 BAYER BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY 31 SERVICES, LLC UPMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, INC. 28 GALAX-ESYSTEMS CORPORATION 26 HIGHMARK, INC. 25 SEVEN HILLS SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES 25 INC VELAGA ASSOCIATES, INC 24 UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE 22 DVI TECHNOLOGES, INC. 21 ALLEGHENY CLINIC 20 GENCO I. INC. 17 SRI MOONLIGHT SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS 17 LLC BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE, LLC 16 BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, 16 INC. VISVERO, INC. 16 CYBYTE, INC. 15 BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION 15 (HOLDINGS) USA, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of AMD EPYC
    Evaluation of AMD EPYC Chris Hollowell <[email protected]> HEPiX Fall 2018, PIC Spain What is EPYC? EPYC is a new line of x86_64 server CPUs from AMD based on their Zen microarchitecture Same microarchitecture used in their Ryzen desktop processors Released June 2017 First new high performance series of server CPUs offered by AMD since 2012 Last were Piledriver-based Opterons Steamroller Opteron products cancelled AMD had focused on low power server CPUs instead x86_64 Jaguar APUs ARM-based Opteron A CPUs Many vendors are now offering EPYC-based servers, including Dell, HP and Supermicro 2 How Does EPYC Differ From Skylake-SP? Intel’s Skylake-SP Xeon x86_64 server CPU line also released in 2017 Both Skylake-SP and EPYC CPU dies manufactured using 14 nm process Skylake-SP introduced AVX512 vector instruction support in Xeon AVX512 not available in EPYC HS06 official GCC compilation options exclude autovectorization Stock SL6/7 GCC doesn’t support AVX512 Support added in GCC 4.9+ Not heavily used (yet) in HEP/NP offline computing Both have models supporting 2666 MHz DDR4 memory Skylake-SP 6 memory channels per processor 3 TB (2-socket system, extended memory models) EPYC 8 memory channels per processor 4 TB (2-socket system) 3 How Does EPYC Differ From Skylake (Cont)? Some Skylake-SP processors include built in Omnipath networking, or FPGA coprocessors Not available in EPYC Both Skylake-SP and EPYC have SMT (HT) support 2 logical cores per physical core (absent in some Xeon Bronze models) Maximum core count (per socket) Skylake-SP – 28 physical / 56 logical (Xeon Platinum 8180M) EPYC – 32 physical / 64 logical (EPYC 7601) Maximum socket count Skylake-SP – 8 (Xeon Platinum) EPYC – 2 Processor Inteconnect Skylake-SP – UltraPath Interconnect (UPI) EYPC – Infinity Fabric (IF) PCIe lanes (2-socket system) Skylake-SP – 96 EPYC – 128 (some used by SoC functionality) Same number available in single socket configuration 4 EPYC: MCM/SoC Design EPYC utilizes an SoC design Many functions normally found in motherboard chipset on the CPU SATA controllers USB controllers etc.
    [Show full text]
  • ANSYS Advantage Thermal Managment
    ™ ADVANADVANTAGETAGE| | Excellence in Engineering Simulation VOLUME X ISSUE 1 2016 6 Beat the Heat 13 Cooling Trend 21 Hot Flash elcome to ANSYS Advantage! We hope you Realize Your Product Promise® enjoy these articles by ANSYS customers, ANSYS enables you to predict with confidence that your staff and partners. Want to be part of a products will thrive in the real world. Customers trust our future issue? Contact the editorial team solutions to help ensure the integrity of products and drive with your idea for an article. business success through innovation. Industry leaders use ANSYS to simulate complete virtual prototypes of complex WThe Editorial Staff, ANSYS Advantage products and systems — comprising mechanical, electronics [email protected] and embedded software components — that incorporate all the physical phenomena that exist in real-world environments. Executive & Editorial Adviser Managing Editor Tom Smithyman ANSYS, Inc. For ANSYS, Inc. sales information, Chris Reeves Southpointe call +1 844.GO ANSYS Editorial Contributor 2600 ANSYS Drive Email the editorial staff at Senior Editor ANSYS Customer Excellence Canonsburg, PA 15317 [email protected]. U.S.A. Tim Palucka North America For address changes, contact Subscribe at [email protected]. ansys.com/advantage Editors Art Directors Erik Ferguson Ron Santillo Kara Gremillion Dan Hart Neither ANSYS, Inc. nor DH4 Design guarantees or warrants accuracy or completeness of the material contained in this publication. Thomas Matich Gregg Weber ANSYS, ALinks,
    [Show full text]
  • Previous Mechanical Engineering Industry Employers
    The University of Iowa College of Engineering Professional Development Cooperative Education/Internship Program Previous Mechanical Engineering Industry Employers Company Name Location(s) 3M Various Accenture Chicago, IA AGCO Corp Park Jackson ALCAN, Inc. Des Moines, IA Alcoa Riverside, IA All Power Labs Berkeley, CA Alliant Energy Cedar Rapids, IA, Madison, WI Allsteel Muscatine, IA Amana Commercial Products Cedar Rapids, IA Amcor Rigid Plastics Manchester, MI American Ordnance Manchester, MI Andersen Corporation Des Moines, IA Ansys Canonsburg, PA Archer Daniels Midland Fremont, NE Associated Materials, Inc. Cedar Rapids, IA ASV Inventions Huntington Beach, CA AutoTruck Group Bartlett, IA Baker Group Des Moines, IA BASF Malcom, IA Bemis Company, Inc. Des Moines, IA Boeing Seattle, WA, Philadelphia, PA Boston Scientific Marlborough, MA BPC Group Orlando, FL Brooks Borg Skiles Architecture Engineering Des Moines, IA Burlington Northern Santa Fe Harre, MT Cadbury Loves Park, IL Cargill Various Case New Holland Industrial Burlington, IA Caterpillar Various CDW Government Chicago, IL Centro, Inc. North Liberty, IA Charles Industries, Ltd. Rantoul, IL Chicago Bridge & Iron Company Chicago, IL Citgo Lemont, IL CIVCO Medical Solutions Coralville, IA, Kalona, IA Clark, Richardson, and Biskup Consulting St. Louis, MO Clear Sign Seattle, WA Clifford Jacobs Forging Various Climco Coils, Inc. Morrison, IL Clipper Windpower Cedar Rapids, IA The University of Iowa College of Engineering Professional Development Cooperative Education/Internship Program
    [Show full text]
  • Aa-Volume-Xv-Issue-1-2021.Pdf
    EXCELLENCE IN ENGINEERING SIMULATION ISSUE 1 | 2021 4 12 23 America’s Cup: Volkswagen Refines ABB Speeds Analysis Sailing With Simulation Vehicle Designs with Twin Builder © 2021 ANSYS, INC. Ansys AdvantageCover1 “Ansys’ acquisition of AGI will help drive our strategy of making simulation pervasive from the smallest component now through a customer’s entire mission.” – Ajei Gopal, President and CEO of Ansys 2 Ansys Advantage Issue 1 / 2021 EDITORIAL Ansys, AGI Extend the Digital Thread Engineered products and systems can involve thousands of components, subsystems, systems and systems of systems that must work together intricately. Ansys software simulates all these pieces of the puzzle and their functional relationships to each other and, increasingly, to their environments. Anthony Dawson The success of a mission can is intended to achieve, and the Vice President & General hinge on the functionality of environment in which it must Manager, Ansys one component. Consider the achieve it. launch of a satellite; once in AGI realized that, too often, orbit, it cannot be recalled. For systems aren’t evaluated in missions like these, there are the full context of their mission has a long history of making no second chances. Simulation until physical prototypes sure that important cargo is critical throughout the entire are put into testing. Many gets where it needs to go. On systems engineering process to organizations may not even Christmas Eve, it continued its ensure that every component realize the extent to which this 23-year tradition of working with — whether part of the payload approach squanders time and the North American Aerospace design, launch system, satellite money, sometimes resulting Defense Command (NORAD) deployment, space propulsion in designs that can’t cooperate Operations Center on the annual system, astrodynamics or with their interdependent assets Santa Tracker experience, which onboard systems — will fulfill or perform adequately in their attracts more than 24 million the mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoxx® Americas 1200 Technology Index
    STOXX® AMERICAS 1200 TECHNOLOGY INDEX Components1 Company Supersector Country Weight (%) Apple Inc. Technology US 17.06 Microsoft Corp. Technology US 12.92 FACEBOOK CLASS A Technology US 8.28 ALPHABET CLASS C Technology US 6.77 Intel Corp. Technology US 4.84 Cisco Systems Inc. Technology US 4.74 International Business Machine Technology US 4.36 Oracle Corp. Technology US 3.95 Qualcomm Inc. Technology US 2.58 Texas Instruments Inc. Technology US 2.02 EMC Corp. Technology US 1.72 Salesforce.com Inc. Technology US 1.63 Adobe Systems Inc. Technology US 1.54 Cognizant Technology Solutions Technology US 1.17 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Technology US 1.07 Yahoo! Inc. Technology US 1.04 Intuit Inc. Technology US 0.90 Applied Materials Inc. Technology US 0.86 NVIDIA Corp. Technology US 0.81 Corning Inc. Technology US 0.77 HP Inc. Technology US 0.76 Analog Devices Inc. Technology US 0.56 Cerner Corp. Technology US 0.56 Red Hat Inc. Technology US 0.46 Symantec Corp. Technology US 0.44 Lam Research Corp. Technology US 0.43 Western Digital Corp. Technology US 0.42 Autodesk Inc. Technology US 0.41 Micron Technology Inc. Technology US 0.41 CGI GROUP 'A' Technology CA 0.41 SKYWORKS SLTN. Technology US 0.39 Xilinx Inc. Technology US 0.38 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. Technology US 0.38 SERVICENOW Technology US 0.37 PALO ALTO NETWORKS Technology US 0.36 Maxim Integrated Products Inc. Technology US 0.34 Check Point Software Technolog Technology US 0.34 Microchip Technology Inc. Technology US 0.34 CA Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Benefits Institute Member List January 2021 1230+ MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS
    1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1100 Oakland California 94612 415-222-7280 www.ibiweb.org Integrated Benefits Institute Member List January 2021 1230+ MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS STAKEHOLDERS • AbbVie • Pfizer • Aflac • Prudential Financial, Inc. • AMGEN • Sedgwick • Anthem, Inc. • Standard Insurance • Aon • Sun Life Financial • Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. • Teladoc Health • Exact Sciences • The Guardian Life Insurance • Health Care Service Corporation Company of America/ReedGroup • Johnson & Johnson • The Hartford • Lincoln Financial Group • Trion-MMA • Lockton Companies • UnitedHealthcare • Mercer • UPMC WorkPartners • Novo Nordisk • Willis Towers Watson CHARTERS • AbleTo • New York Life • Alliant Insurance Services • PhRMA • Broadspire • Reliance Standard/Matrix Absence • ESIS Management • Merck • Walgreens • Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ASSOCIATES • Buck • Piper Jordan • Kaiser Permanente • Sera Prognostics • Pacific Resources Benefit Advisors, • Spring Consulting Group LLC • Voya Financial 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1100 Oakland California 94612 415-222-7280 www.ibiweb.org AFFILIATES • Amazon Disability Leave Services • Heron Therapeutics • CoreHealth Technologies • Inspera Health • Curant Health • Mayo Clinic • EPIC (Edgewood Partners Insurance • Precision for Value Center) • Quantum Health • Erie Insurance Group • Sleepcharge by Nox Health • Evive Health • SWORD Health • Genentech, Inc. • Vida Health • GlaxoSmithKline • Wellthy • Headversity • Health Data & Management Solutions (HDMS) EMPLOYERS • Aleris • 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. •
    [Show full text]