DOCSLIB.ORG

EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT Handbook for School of Education Student

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT Handbook for School of Education Student EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT Handbook for School of Education Student PRIADI SURYA, M.Pd. Yogyakarta State University 2011 FOREWORD Educational Management: Handbook for School of Education Student is practically a student handbook on Educational Management subject. This subject is a part of Educational Foundation Subjects ( Mata Kuliah Dasar Kependidikan ) for the student of all educational study programs. This book presents the basic science of educational management. It is important introduce the educational management to all educational study programs’ student. The future teachers are must be prepared in managerial knowledge and skills. They will be faced into resources management, such as facility, student, curriculum, finance, public relations, leadership, office administration, personnel, and supervision. Author also provides the international perspectives in every chapter. Mostly are based on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) as our benchmark. We hope our future teachers will adopt and adapt the innovations in the best practice. November 2011 Priadi Surya Department of Educational Administration Faculty of Education Yogyakarta State University [email protected] i CONTENT Foreword ............................................................................................................ i Content ............................................................................................................ ii Chapter 1 The Concept of Educational Management ....................................... 1 A. Definition of Educational Management ................................................... 1 B. Functions of Educational Management .................................................. 2 C. Area of Educational Management Field Study ....................................... 9 D. References .......................................................................................... 13 E. Evaluation ........................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2 Educational Leadership .................................................................. 15 A. Definition of Educational Leadership ................................................... 15 B. Preview of Educational Leadership Theories ....................................... 18 C. Type of Educational Leadership ........................................................... 22 D. References ........................................................................................... 27 E. Evaluation ........................................................................................... 28 Chapter 3 Educational Supervision ................................................................. 29 A. Definition of Educational Supervision ................................................... 29 B. Educational Supervision Techniques ................................................... 33 C. References ........................................................................................... 39 D. Evaluation ............................................................................................ 40 Chapter 4 Educational Organization ............................................................... 41 A. Definition of Educational Organization ................................................. 41 B. Structure of Educational Organization .................................................. 42 C. Pathway, Level and Type of Educational Organization ........................ 46 D. References ........................................................................................... 54 E. Evaluation ........................................................................................... 55 Chapter 5 Curriculum Management ................................................................ 56 A. Definition of Curriculum Management .................................................. 56 B. Organizing The Curriculum .................................................................. 60 C. Curriculum Development ...................................................................... 60 D. References ........................................................................................... 67 E. Evaluation ............................................................................................ 68 Chapter 6 Student Management ..................................................................... 69 A. Definition of Student Management ....................................................... 69 B. Enrolment Management ....................................................................... 70 C. Student Discipline and Development ................................................... 71 D. Special Service for Student .................................................................. 73 E. References ........................................................................................... 76 F. Evaluation ............................................................................................ 77 ii Chapter 7 Educational Personnel Management .............................................. 78 A. Definition of Educational Personnel ..................................................... 78 B. Definition of Educational Personnel Management ................................ 83 C. Educational Personnel Recruitment ..................................................... 84 D. Educational Personnel Development ................................................... 90 E. Educational Personnel Dismissal ......................................................... 93 F. References ........................................................................................... 98 G. Evaluation ............................................................................................ 99 Chapter 8 Educational Facility Management ................................................ 100 A. Definition of Education Facility ........................................................... 100 B. Educational Facility Procurement ....................................................... 101 C. Educational Facility Utilization and Maintenance ............................... 102 D. Educational Facility Removal ............................................................. 103 E. References ......................................................................................... 106 F. Evaluation .......................................................................................... 107 Chapter 9 Educational Finance Management ............................................... 108 A. Definition of Educational Finance Management ................................. 108 B. Educational Finance Sources ............................................................. 109 C. Budgeting in Educational Institution ................................................... 109 D. Educational Finance Auditing ............................................................. 110 E. References ......................................................................................... 118 F. Evaluation .......................................................................................... 119 Chapter 10 Educational Public Relations ...................................................... 120 A. Definition of Educational Public Relations .......................................... 120 B. Type of Educational Public Relations ................................................. 122 C. Type of Educational Institution-Public Cooperation ............................ 125 D. Reference ........................................................................................... 132 E. Evaluation .......................................................................................... 133 Chapter 11 Educational Office Administration and Management Information System ....................................................................................... 134 A. Definition of Educational Office Administration ................................... 134 B. Functions of Educational Office Administration .................................. 136 C. Procedure of Educational Office Administration ................................. 139 D. Definition of Educational Management Information System ............... 140 E. Procedure of Educational Management Information System ............. 141 F. References ......................................................................................... 145 G. Evaluation .......................................................................................... 146 iii Chapter 1 The Concept of Educational Management At the end of this part, students should be able to: 1. Make the educational management definition. 2. Explain the area of educational management field study. 3. Apply the main principles each managerial function to the national and international education setting. A. Definition of Educational Management Some experts who explain the meaning of management is Frederick W. Taylor and Henry Fayol. They put forward the scientific management movement. Educational management also influenced by their views. Taylor recommended the use of performance standards, namely the achievement of the expected labor productivity. A goal is something to be achieved by the organization. While the standard is a measure of performance which if met will result in the destination set. The other management expert is Fayol. On his book Administration Industrielle et Generale , which translated in America become General and Industrial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparison of the Inspection Criteria for Turkish Preschool Institutions with International Accreditation Standards
    www.ijres.net Comparison of the Inspection Criteria for Turkish Preschool Institutions with International Accreditation Standards Zehra Keser Özmantar1, Dilek Karataşoğlu2 1Gaziantep University 2Gaziantep Provincial Directorate of National Education ISSN: 2148-9955 To cite this article: Keser Ozmantar, Z. & Karatasoglu, D. (2019). Comparison of the inspection criteria for Turkish preschool institutions with international accreditation standards. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 5(1), 190-202. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. International Journal of Research in Education and Science Volume 5, Issue 1, Winter 2019 ISSN: 2148-9955 Comparison of the Inspection Criteria for Turkish Preschool Institutions with International Accreditation Standards Zehra Keser Özmantar, Dilek Karataşoğlu Article Info Abstract Article History The evaluation of preschool education institutions in Turkey is conducted by two different bodies: The Ministry of National Education (MoNE) and The Received: Ministry of Family and Social Policies (MoFSP). To date, there does not 19 August 2018 appear any attempt to designate the compliance of MoNE and MoFSP evaluation criteria with international quality standards. This study takes a step Accepted: forward to this direction in order to put forth the areas in need of special 21 November 2018 considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing and Leading in Early Childhood Education: a Study of Heads of Centers in Greece
    US-China Education Review B, ISSN 2161-6248 September 2013, Vol. 3, No. 9, 663-679 D DAVID PUBLISHING Managing and Leading in Early Childhood Education: A Study of Heads of Centers in Greece Eleftheria Argyropoulou University of Crete, Rethymnon, Greece This paper presents ECE (early childhood education) Headteachers’ perceptions of their managing and leading roles, as well as their attitudes towards their professional careers as leaders in an EC (early childhood) educational organization. This research, as a case study, collected data from EC Headteachers in Greece. The case study found that, despite local/national level particularities, many of the common elements and issues for discussion raised by the Greek EC Headteachers participating in the study were similar to those reported in studies from other national contexts. Keywords: ECE, kindergarten Headteachers, management, leadership Introduction This paper studies the managing and leading perceptions of ECE (early childhood education) institutions’ heads, in Greece. The research was conducted only in state institutions for young children 4-6 years old (called kindergartens, or “Nipiagogeia”, in Greek), which outnumber by far the private ones (97.6% state to 2.4% private in 2008) (OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2011b). Previous research (Argyropoulou, 2011a; Argyropoulou Hatira, to be published in 2014) indicated that the ECE heads in Greece are more satisfied with their teaching role than with their managing and leading roles, the latter being considered a necessity coming with seniority in the job. Hence, the purpose of this paper is two-fold: (1) To identify EC (early childhood) Headteachers’ specific attitudes towards their management and leadership roles; and (2) To seek evidence as to why these attitudes were caused and how they have affected EC Headteachers’ career paths and personal attitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing and Supporting Early Childhood Teacher Leaders: a Leadership Project Connecting University, Community and Public School Resources∗
    Connexions module: m36694 1 Developing and Supporting Early Childhood Teacher Leaders: A Leadership Project Connecting University, Community and Public School Resources∗ C. Robert Maxeld Julie Ricks-Doneen Barbara A. Klocko Lisa Sturges This work is produced by The Connexions Project and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License y Abstract The empowerment of early childhood educators as teacher leaders can translate into eective instruc- tional practices that promote children's development. This paper aims to broaden the discussion about the relationship between early childhood educators and their traditional K-12 counterparts. We seek to present a wider exploration of what it takes to develop and maintain systemic changes in thinking the philosophies, the perceptions, the policies and the commitments that are necessary in creating sustained educational change. 1 The International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, Volume 6, Number 1, January - March, 2011, ISSN 2155-9635 note: This manuscript has been peer-reviewed, accepted, and endorsed by the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA) as a signicant contribution to the scholarship ∗Version 1.2: Jan 18, 2011 11:40 am US/Central yhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://cnx.org/content/m36694/1.2/ Connexions module: m36694 2 and practice of education administration. In addition to publication in the Connexions Content Commons, this module is published in the International Journal of Educational Leadership Prepa- ration,1 Volume 6, Number 1 (January - March, 2011), ISSN 2155-9635. Formatted and edited in Connexions by Theodore Creighton and Brad Bizzell, Virginia Tech and Janet Tareilo, Stephen F. Austin State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics in Early Childhood Education
    The Primary Program for All Children Classrooms grounded in best-practice education, and modified to be responsive to students’ differences, benefit virtually all students. Differentiation addresses the needs of struggling and advanced learners. It addresses the needs of students for whom English is a second language and students who have strong learning style preferences. It addresses gender differences and cultural differences. It pays homage to the truth that we are not born to become replicas of one another. Tomlinson, 1999 he primary program responds to the diversity of learners by helping children to understand, respect, and appreciate individual differences. The teacher fosters the belief that all Tindividuals have strengths to share and things to learn from others’ uniqueness. The early childhood setting may be the first place in which children realize how they are like other children and how they are different from others. Children seem to accept these differences and similarities and to know they can succeed when they experience respect and a sense of purpose. This attitude of acceptance without competition fosters growth in ALL. It helps children to realize the benefits of appreciating each other, focusing on how they can work together to find solutions, finish projects, and set and complete goals. Although external differences among people may be obvious, the need for safety, respect, caring, and equal opportunity for learning and growth are universal. By creating environments in which unique abilities and contributions are recognized and celebrated, the heritage, gender, culture and talents of all members are respected. The primary program is designed to be child-centered and to recognize, value, and successfully accommodate the diversity of individual learners, including children of all ability levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Australian Council for Educational Leaders
    ACEL Leading & Managing | Volume 20 Number 1 | Autumn/Winter 2014 2014 Autumn/Winter | Number 1 20 Volume | Managing Leading & ACEL Journal of the Australian Council for Educational Leaders Volume 20 Number 1 2014 ISSN 1329-4539 Leading & Managing Journal of the Australian Council for Educational Leaders Patron: Emeritus Professor Frank Crowther AM, The University of Southern Queensland EDITORS Associate Professor Dorothy Andrews & Dr Marian Lewis Leadership Research International Faculty of Business, Education, Law and Arts The University of Southern Queensland Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia Email: [email protected]; [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Professor Lawrence Angus Emeritus Professor Frank Crowther AM Dr David Gurr Head, School of Education Leadership Research (LRI) Senior Lecturer, University of Ballarat University of Southern Queensland Melbourne Graduate School of Education P O Box 663 Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350 University of Melbourne Ballarat, Victoria, 3353 Australia Australia Victoria, 3010 Australia Professor Les Bell Emeritus Professor Neil Dempster Professor Gabriele Lakomski Centre for Educational Leadership Griffith Institute for Educational Research Centre for the Study of Higher Education and Management Griffith University Melbourne Graduate School of Education The University of Leicester Brisbane, Queensland, 4111 Australia University of Melbourne 162-166 Upper New Walk 715 Swanston St, Victoria, 3010 Australia Leicester Emeritus Professor Patrick Duignan LE1 7QA, United Kingdom Director,
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Efficiency Management System for Private Kindergarten Schools in Samutprakan Province, Thailand
    Creative Education, 2017, 8, 1099-1110 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ce ISSN Online: 2151-4771 ISSN Print: 2151-4755 Development of Efficiency Management System for Private Kindergarten Schools in Samutprakan Province, Thailand Praserd Sawaddemongkol, Kanchana Boonphak, Narong Pimsarn King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang, Thailand How to cite this paper: Sawaddemongkol, Abstract P., Boonphak, K., & Pimsarn, N. (2017). Development of Efficiency Management The development of young learners to become adults who positively contri- System for Private Kindergarten Schools in bute to society is crucial to human prosperity and sustainability. As kinder- Samutprakan Province, Thailand. Creative garten is the educational level where learners begin this development, the im- Education, 8, 1099-1110. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.87079 portance of efficient kindergarten school management is undeniable. This re- search studied issues relevant to management of private kindergarten schools Received: June 1, 2017 in Samutprakan province, Thailand, to determine positive factors supporting Accepted: June 19, 2017 management of such schools and to develop an effective management system Published: June 22, 2017 for them. Data were collected from a sample group consisting of local private Copyright © 2017 by authors and kindergarten school administrators and teachers using questionnaires, as well Scientific Research Publishing Inc. as from a focus group of 8 experts in fields pertinent to early childhood edu- This work is licensed under the Creative cation. Results revealed several factors, most notably knowledge and skills of Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). teachers and the leadership of administrators, that greatly affect efficient http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ management.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Educational Leadership and Its Role in Converting Traditional Schools Into Professional Learning Communities
    Instructions for authors, subscriptions and further details: http://ijelm.hipatiapress.com Contemporary Educational Leadership and its Role in Converting Traditional Schools into Professional Learning Communities. Mofareh Alkrdem1 1) King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia. Date of publication: July 16th, 2020 Edition period: July 2019 - July 2020 To cite this article: Alkrdem, M. (2020). Contemporary Educational Leadership and its Role in Converting Traditional Schools into Professional Learning Communities. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management. 8 (2), 144- 171. doi: 10.17583/ijelm.2020.4298 To link this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2020.4298 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE The terms and conditions of use are related to the Open Journal System and to Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL). IJELM – International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management Vol 8 No. 2 July 2020 pp.144-171 Contemporary Educational Leadership and its Role in Converting Traditional Schools into Professional Learning Communities. Mofareh Alkrdem _ King Khalid University Saudi Arabia Abstract The dynamics of school as a single source of knowledge have changed, which eliminate the organizational obstacles that hinder its learning process and endeavor towards the construction of a leadership competence. The ability of an organization to construct and support the professional learning communities depends on its ability to improve and support an individual. This study therefore aims to investigate the role of contemporary educational leadership in converting traditional schools into professional learning communities. The current study has adopted one of the developmental approaches that simultaneously represent contemporary trends in improving the school. An increase is found among the school staff related to the improvement and development of the project concerning its planning, organizing, implementation, and evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Teachers As Early Childhood Principals: a Qualitative Case Study
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Dissertations and Theses @ UNI Student Work 2014 Secondary teachers as early childhood principals: A qualitative case study Brian Dale Kingrey University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2014 Brian Dale Kingrey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd Part of the Educational Administration and Supervision Commons Recommended Citation Kingrey, Brian Dale, "Secondary teachers as early childhood principals: A qualitative case study" (2014). Dissertations and Theses @ UNI. 16. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/16 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses @ UNI by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright by BRIAN DALE KINGREY 2014 All Rights Reserved SECONDARY TEACHERS AS EARLY CHILDHOOD PRINCIPALS: A QUALITATIVE CASE STUDY An Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Approved: _______________________________________ Dr. Victoria Robinson, Committee Chair _______________________________________ Dr. April Chatham-Carpenter Interim Dean of the Graduate College Brian Dale Kingrey University of Northern Iowa December 2014 ABSTRACT Research has demonstrated a correlation between effective education leaders, principals in particular, and student achievement. The correlation included characteristics, or responsibilities, that effective principals exhibit in order to raise student achievement. These responsibilities, along with developmentally appropriate practices, serve as conceptual frameworks for this case study. The purpose of this study was to examine the lived experiences of preschool through third grade teachers who have served under principals with early childhood/elementary backgrounds and those with backgrounds in middle/secondary education.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership and Management Development in Education
    Leadership and Management Development in Education Tony Bush Contents Notes on the author v Series Editor’s foreword vii Preface ix 1 Leadership and school improvement 1 Introduction 1 Leadership or management? 1 Leadership and school improvement 6 Conclusion 8 2 Models of educational leadership 9 Introduction 9 Models of educational leadership and management 10 Linking the models to leadership development 20 3 The significance of leadership and management development 25 Introduction 25 The expanded role of school leaders 26 The increasing complexity of school contexts 28 Leadership preparation as a moral obligation 29 Effective leadership preparation makes a difference 30 Conclusion 32 4 The curriculum for leadership development: content and process 33 Introduction 33 The content of leadership development programmes 34 Leadership development processes 41 Conclusion: content or process? 49 5 Preparing and supporting leaders in developed countries 53 Introduction 53 Leadership succession 53 © 2008 Hawker Brownlow Education • SA4170 iii iv LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATION Leadership preparation 56 Leadership selection 61 Induction for leadership 65 Leadership training and development 67 Overview 70 6 The National College for School Leadership 73 Introduction 73 Leadership development in England before the NCSL 74 The Leadership Development Framework 75 The National Professional Qualification for Headship 77 Strengths and achievements of the NCSL 79 Weaknesses and limitations of the NCSL 82 Conclusion 86 7 Preparing and
    [Show full text]
  • Research in Educational Administration & Leadership
    Research in Educational Administration & Leadership Volume: 5, Issue: 1/March 2020 Decision-Making Processes Using WhatsApp Emanuel Tamir Ohalo college of Education, Katzrin, Israel Ran Etgar Ruppin College, Faculty of Engineering, Israel Daniel Peled Open University, Ra'anana, Israel Article Abstract Info Smartphone applications have become increasingly popular, Article History: influencing functioning in all life domains. This study Received February, 09, 2019 investigated the influence of the WhatsApp application on decision-making processes among kindergarten-managers. The Accepted research aimed to investigate the types of decisions made using June, 30, 2019 WhatsApp. To examine this, a 3-phase mixed-method research was applied: (1) 23 semi-structured interviews with kindergarten managers. (2) Analysis of 74 WhatsApp managers-parents conversations. (3) A questionnaire administered to 324 kindergarten-managers. The managers Keywords: reported a constant pressure for an immediate reaction and Decision- rapid decision making. Despite the pressure, managers claim making, Managerial they can limit the decision making to simple decisions and decisions, WhatsApp, postpone complex decision making to off-line procedures. Yet, Kindergarten- analysis of the questionnaire results indicate that this claimed managers, Complex ability to differentiate and limit the decision making to simple decisions ones, is not the general case: managers who benefitted more from WhatsApp tended to broaden the decision-making scope to all types of decisions. The expectation is that, as WhatsApp benefits to managers Tamir, Etgar & Peled (2020). Decision-making processes using Whatsapp … become more and more evident and the pressure to respond quickly increases, the barriers will tend to fall down, and more complex decision will be made on-line with the evident implications.
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Leadership: Perceptions of Principals and Teachers of the Secondary Education Directorate
    International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development 2017, Vol. 6, No. 1 ISSN: 2226-6348 Management and Leadership: Perceptions of principals and teachers of the Secondary Education Directorate Dr. Vasiliki Brinia Hellenic Open University Vasiliki Tsouni Hellenic Open University DOI: 10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i1/2586 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i1/2586 Abstract This research attempts to record the views of principals and teachers regarding the principals of schools of the Secondary Education Directorate in Athens, Greece. Furthermore, it investigates how they administrate the educational units in order to highlight the features that distinguish the manager from the leader. Additionally, it underlines the need for teachers’ training on issues in leadership and management, to improve efficacy in the educational unit. The research was conducted via anonymous questionnaire in 121 participants. The conclusions strengthened the inclusion of the management functions in the educational process. They also stressed the lack of principals – leaders and demonstrated the inability of schools to appreciate training courses and to innovate. Keywords: Management, Leadership, Educational Management, Effectiveness Introduction The educational unit is a living and evolving organism, a dynamic coexistence of teachers, students, parents and the wider society. It is run by one person, the principal, who is responsible for the proper operation, must ensure a climate of cooperation, promote interactive and creative exchange of views and overall to create the appropriate culture in order to always achieve expectations and goals. In addition principals must work with the faculty and provide the link between the central government decisions and the transposition and implementation in the educational environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctor of Education Major in Educational Management Academic Year 2018-2019 Reference CMO: CMO No
    Republic of the Philippines BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY Pablo Borbon Main I, Batangas City, Philippines 4200 COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION Tel. No. (043) 980-0385 local 1128 Email: [email protected] CURRICULUM Doctor of Education major in Educational Management Academic Year 2018-2019 Reference CMO: CMO No. 53, s. 2007 Curriculum Description Doctoral programs in education aim to develop capacities of teachers and other education professionals for developing new knowledge and strategies in specific areas within the broad field of educational science and practice. Such programs shall focus on the development and validation of new theories, models, programs, and practices about the different aspects of the educational process. Program Objectives The Doctor of Education major in Educational Management aims to produce educators who: 1. demonstrate advanced knowledge on the theoretical foundations of education, specifically in the areas of educational leadership, policy development, instructional design, and curriculum development; 2. possess and manifest research competencies sufficient to design, conduct, analyze and report quantitative and qualitative research on various topics of relevance; 3. demonstrate teaching competencies sufficient to design, deliver, monitor and revise instruction at the undergraduate and/or graduate level on a particular content of relevance; and 4. embark as school leader, district office administrator, program director, college dean, curriculum developer, educational consultant, policy analyst, or school administrator. Program Outcomes Graduates of the Doctor of Education major in Educational Management program are expected to: 1. utilize theories and principles of leadership to guide organizations through strategic planning, integrating innovative strategies for teaching and learning; 2. provide school and instructional leadership by effectively managing the operations of academic institutions, creating a student-centered learning climate, and manifesting positive personal and professional attributes; 3.
    [Show full text]