DOCSLIB.ORG

Zambia Poverty Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zambia Poverty Assessment Report No. 81001 - ZM Public Disclosure Authorized Zambia Poverty Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized Stagnant Poverty and Inequality in a Natural Resource-Based Economy Public Disclosure Authorized December 2012 Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized Abbreviations and Acronyms ARVs Antiretroviral Drugs BIA Benefit Incidence Analysis CCT Conditional Cash Transfer CSO Central Statistical Office, Government of the Republic of Zambia CSP Community, Social and Personal Services FISP Farmer Input Support Program FSP Fertilizer Support Program FSPP Food Security Pack Program GCE General Certificate of Education HDI United Nations Human Development Index ILO International Labor Organization IOB Policy and Operations Evaluation Department, Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs ISIC International Standard Industrial Classification LCMS Living Conditions Monitoring Survey LFPR Labor Force Participation Rate LFS Labor Force Survey MACO Zambian Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives MoFNP Zambian Ministry of Finance and National Planning MDG Millennium Development Goal MoH Zambian Ministry of Health NGO Nongovernmental Organization SSA Sub-Saharan Africa WDI World Bank World Development indicators WHO World Health Organization ZMK Zambian Kwacha ii Acknowledgements This report is the product of a team effort between the World Bank and the Government of Zambia. The report incorporates papers prepared by several World Bank staff members and consultants. Roy Katayama, Sean Lothrop, Julio Revilla, Monica Beuran, Nobuo Yoshida, Shivapragasam Shivakumaran and Louise Fox collaborated at different stages of a long but fruitful process, which incorporated advanced methodological discussions with government representatives including the Central Statistical Office (CSO) and the Ministry of Finance and National Planning (MoFNP). The inputs provided by these organizations are reflected in the detailed description of Zambian poverty dynamics presented in the first two chapters. Haron Bhorat was responsible for the labor market analysis presented in the third chapter. The fourth chapter, on the provision of public service and the orientation of social spending was prepared by Jose Cuesta, Pamela Kabaso and Pablo Suarez- Becerra. The team was led by Julio Revilla who produced the draft report with Sean Lothrop. Peter Lanjouw and Gabriel Demombynes provided very detailed comments and suggestions as peer reviewers. As noted above, this Poverty Assessment was developed in partnership with Zambia’s CSO and MoFNP. Goodson Sinyenga, Director of Economic Statistics at the CSO, and Francis Chipimo, Advisor at the MoFNP, provided invaluable advice. Vice President: Makhtar Diop Country Director: Kundhavi Kadiresan Sector Director: Marcelo Giugale Sector Manager: John Panzer Task Manager: Julio Revilla iii Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................................. ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................... vii List of Boxes ...................................................................................................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 1 Poverty in Zambia ........................................................................................................................... 1 The Labor Force, Income and Employment Dynamics.................................................................... 2 Poverty and Social Spending ........................................................................................................... 5 Policy Options ................................................................................................................................. 7 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 11 The Zambian Economy .................................................................................................................. 11 A Note on the Data ....................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 1: Poverty and Inequality ........................................................................................................ 14 A. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 14 B. Poverty Trends .......................................................................................................................... 17 National, Urban and Rural Poverty Trends (1996-2010) .............................................................. 19 Provincial Poverty Trends ............................................................................................................. 23 C. Distributional Changes in Consumption Expenditures ............................................................. 26 Growth Incidence Curves .............................................................................................................. 28 D. Trends in Nonmonetary Poverty Indicators .............................................................................. 29 Public Health ................................................................................................................................. 30 Education ...................................................................................................................................... 31 E. Trends in Inequality .................................................................................................................. 34 F. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 37 Chapter 2: The Poverty Profile .............................................................................................................. 39 A. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 39 B. Demographics of Poverty .......................................................................................................... 40 Correlates of Poverty .................................................................................................................... 44 Rural and Urban Poverty ............................................................................................................... 45 C. Assets and Housing Conditions ................................................................................................. 49 iv D. Access to Basic Services ............................................................................................................ 52 E. Self-Identified Causes of Poverty .............................................................................................. 55 F. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 57 Chapter 3: The Labor Market, Employment and Wages ...................................................................... 59 A. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 59 B. Data and Definitions Used in the Analysis ................................................................................ 59 The Dataset ................................................................................................................................... 59 Definitions and Exclusions ............................................................................................................ 60 C. Statistical Characteristics of the Labor Market Model ............................................................. 60 D. An Overview of the Employed and Unemployed Workforce ................................................... 66 Urban-Rural Linkages and the Unemployment Differential ......................................................... 70 E. Income Dynamics ...................................................................................................................... 73 F. Determinants of Employment: A Multinomial Logit Model ..................................................... 76 Estimation Results ......................................................................................................................... 78 G. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 79 Chapter 4: Poverty and Social Spending ............................................................................................... 81 A. Introduction .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zambia National Programme Policy Brief
    UN-REDD ZAMBIA NATIONAL PROGRAMME POLICY BRIEF DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION AND POTENTIAL FOR REDD+ INTERVENTIONS IN ZAMBIA Jacob Mwitwa, Royd Vinya, Exhildah Kasumu, Stephen Syampungani, Concilia Monde, and Robby Kasubika Background Deforestation and poor forest stewardship reduce carbon stocks and the capacity for carbon storage in Zambian forests. Forest loss is caused by a mix of factors that are not well understood, and their combined effects act to either directly drive forest cover loss or interact with other or influences. In order to understand the drivers and their interactions a study was commissioned to provide a preliminary understanding of drivers of deforestation and the potential for forest types (Fanshawe 1971; White 1983); to differ REDD+ in Zambia; to assess the extent of current substantially in the key drivers of deforestation consumption of forest products, forest production (ZFAP 1998); and have diverse cultural and socio- and development trends as well as potential future economic settings. Sample selection of districts shifts in these patterns that may affect deforestation was based on review of statistics from isolated case levels; to draw conclusions on which actions/trends studies and on analysis of land cover maps and would likely have the worst consequences in terms satellite images. of causing additional deforestation and how these could be reduced in future; and finally to outline the potential for REDD+ in these circumstances. Vegetation Types Of Zambia An interdisciplinary data gathering approach was Zambia has three major vegetation formations. The adopted which integrated literature search, policy closed forests are limited in extent, covering only level consultancy, community level consultations, about 6% of the Country.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Design Thinking Be Used to Improve Healthcare in Lusaka Province, Zambia?
    INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE - DESIGN 2014 Dubrovnik - Croatia, May 19 - 22, 2014. CAN DESIGN THINKING BE USED TO IMPROVE HEALTHCARE IN LUSAKA PROVINCE, ZAMBIA? C. A. Watkins, G. H. Loudon, S. Gill and J. E. Hall Keywords: ethnography, design thinking, Zambia, healthcare 1. Background ‘Africa experiences 24% of the global burden of disease, while having only 2% of the global physician supply and spending that is less than 1% of global expenditures.’ [Scheffler et al. 2008]. Every day the equivalent of two jumbo jets full of women die in Childbirth; 99% of these deaths occur in the developing world [WHO 2012]. For every death, 20 more women are left with debilitating conditions, such as obstetric fistula or other injuries to the vaginal tract [Jensen et al. 2008]. In the last 50 years, US$2.3 trillion has been spent on foreign aid [Easterly 2006]; US$1 trillion in Africa [Moyo 2009]. Despite this input, both Easterly and Moyo argue there has been little benefit. Easterly highlights that this enormous donation has not reduced childhood deaths from malaria by half, nor enabled poor families access to malaria nets at $4 each. Hodges [2007] reported that although equipment capable of saving lives is available in developing countries, more than 50% is not in service. Studies have asked why this should be so high [Gratrad et al. 2007], [Dyer et al. 2009], [Malkin et al. 2011] the majority focussing on medical equipment donation. They suggest that it is not feasible to directly donate equipment from high to low-income settings without understanding how the receiving environment differs from that which it is designed for.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Health Sector Public Expenditure Tracking and Quantitative Service Delivery Survey
    Public Disclosure Authorized Zambia Health Sector Public Expenditure Tracking and Quantitative Service Delivery Survey Public Disclosure Authorized Collins Chansa Thulani Matsebula Moritz Piatti Dale Mudenda Chitalu Miriam Chama-Chiliba Bona Chitah Oliver Kaonga Chris Mphuka Public Disclosure Authorized April 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized © 2019 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 19 18 17 16 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Accountability and Redress for Discrimination in Healthcare in Botswana, Malawi and Zambia
    Accountability and redress for discrimination in healthcare in Botswana, Malawi and Zambia SOUTHERN AFRICA LITIGATION CENTRE Accountability and redress for discrimination in healthcare in Botswana, Malawi and Zambia August 2016 SALC REPORT Accountability and redress for discrimination in healthcare in Botswana, Malawi and Zambia © 2016 Southern Africa Litigation Centre ISBN Print: 978-0-620-72928-4 ISBN Digital: 978-0-60-72930-7 About the Southern Africa Litigation Centre The Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC), established in 2005, aims to provide support – both technical and financial – to human rights and public interest initiatives undertaken by domestic lawyers in southern Africa. SALC works in Angola, Botswana, Democratic Republic of Congo, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Its model is to work in conjunction with domestic lawyers in each jurisdiction who are litigating public interest cases involving human rights or the rule of law. SALC supports these lawyers in a variety of ways, as appropriate, including providing legal research and drafting, training and mentoring, and monetary support. SALC’s objectives include the provision of training and the facilitation of legal networks within the region. Authorship and acknowledgement This report was researched and written by Annabel Raw, Health Rights Lawyer at SALC, with data sourced from consultants Chipo Nkhata, Monica Tabengwa and Ketsile Molokomme, and from the Botswana Council for the Disabled (Dorcas Taukobong), the Centre for Human Rights Education, Advice and Assistance (Victor Mhango and Chikondi Chijozi Ngwira), the Coalition of Women Living with HIV and AIDS, Malawi (Annie Banda), the Centre for the Development of People, Malawi (Victor Gama and Gift Trapence), Disability Rights Watch (Wamundila Waliuya and Bruce Chooma), Friends of Rainka (Henry Muzawandile), the International Coalition of Women, Zambia (Clementine Mumba), Lesbian Gays and Bisexuals of Botswana (Bradley Fortuin), Sisonke Botswana (Tosh Legoreng), and Transbantu Zambia (Sean Reggee).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Churches and Health: an Examination of Four
    Local churches and Health: An examination of four local churches’ contribution to direct health outcomes on the Copperbelt Province of Zambia. By Kabwe Maybin Kabwe Student Number:204514409 Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Ac ademic Requirement for the Masters Degree of Theology and Development in the School of Religion and Theology , Pietermaritzburg Supervisor: Rev. Dr. Prof. Steve De Gruc hy Dec ember 2008 DEDICATION I humbly dedicate this thesis to my family namely my dear wife Songwe and the my children, Mubanga, Mumba and Theophilus and the church at Grace Reformed Baptist Church; whose encouragement, support and understanding graciously made it possible for me to be away from home and church duties in order to complete my studies. Kabwe Maybin Kabwe. i DECLARATION I, Kabwe Maybin Kabwe, hereby declare that this whole dissertation, unless specifically indicated to the contrary in the text, represents my original work. I also declare that I have not otherwise submitted this dissertation in any form for any degree purpose or examination to any university. __________________________ _____/_____/________ Kabwe Maybin Kabwe Date As supervisor, I agree to the submission of this thesis _________________________ _____ /______/_________ Prof. Steven De Gruchy Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am deeply indebted to acknowledge and thank a number of people for their contribution in the writing and completion of this dissertation. Primarily, I thank God and my Savior Jesus Christ for having granted me breath thus far to complete my studies. I am also greatly indebted to Rev. Dr. Prof Steve De Gruchy whose inspiration and passion in his lectures inspired me to pursue a Masters in Theology and Development studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Project
    STRENGTHENING EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE – UP (STEP-UP) ZAMBIA PROJECT QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT FY 2014 Q3: APRIL 1 – JUNE 30, 2014 Contract No. AID-611-C-12-00001 JULY 31, 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Cover photo: A Grade One learner demonstrates her literacy skills in front of provincial and district educational officers at the provincial launch of the Let’s Read Zambia campaign in Southern Province. Though she is a Grade One student, she is able to read from a Grade Two textbook. STEP-UP ZAMBIA FY2014 Q3 PROGRESS REPORT ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2 A. INTEGRATE AND STRENGTHEN SYSTEMS FOR IMPROVED DECISION-MAKING (TASK 1) 6 B. PROMOTE EQUITY AS A CENTRAL THEME IN POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION (TASK 2) 9 C. INSTITUTIONALIZE THE MESVTEE’S MANAGEMENT OF HIV AND AIDS WORKPLACE POLICIES (TASK 3) 9 D. STRENGTHEN DECENTRALIZATION FOR IMPROVED LEARNER PERFORMANCE (TASK 4) 15 E. ENGAGE ZAMBIAN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE MESVTEE POLICY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS (TASK 5) 24 F. MANAGEMENT, MONITORING, AND EVALUATION 28 III. GOALS FOR NEXT QUARTER 30 ANNEX A: SUCCESS STORY 32 ANNEX B: STATUS OF M&E INDICATORS 35 ANNEX C: ACTIVE DATA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES 39 STEP-UP ZAMBIA FY2014 Q3 PROGRESS REPORT iii
    [Show full text]
  • Sector Budget Support in Practice
    Sector Budget Support in Practice Synthesis Report February 2010 Tim Williamson and Catherine Dom Overseas Development Institute 111 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7JD UK and Mokoro 87 London Road Headington Oxford OX3 9AA UK Sector Budget Support in Practice – Synthesis Report Acknowledgements and Disclaimer This report is based on a synthesis of case studies which were written by a large team of researchers. The lead case study authors were: Tanzania Health – Gregory Smith Uganda Education – Edward Hedger Uganda Local Government – Jesper Steffensen Mali Education – Karolyn Thunnissen Mozambique Health – Muriel Visser-Valfrey Mozambique Agriculture – Lidia Cabral Rwanda Education – Mailan Chiche Tanzania Local Government – Per Tidemand Zambia Roads – Geoff Handley (also Literature Review) Zambia Health – Ann Bartholomew (also Donor Headquarters Accountability Study) This synthesis report was written by Tim Williamson and Catherine Dom, and reviewed by David Booth and Stephen Lister. We are grateful for the many helpful comments made to this report and the case studies. Particular thanks go to Jeremy Clarke and the case study authors. The research was carried out for the Strategic Partnership with Africa (SPA) and funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID). The Agence Française de Développement funded the translation of the main reports. The views expressed in the report do not reflect the positions of DFID, SPA, the Overseas Development Institute or Mokoro. Furthermore, as is natural such a large study, it is possible that not all of the researchers would endorse the analysis and conclusions in this report in their entirety. ii Sector Budget Support in Practice – Synthesis Report Contents Acknowledgements and Disclaimer ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Final Report Vsummaryolume Iii Volume Iii Pre-Feaibility Study of Priority Project Pre-Feaibility Study of Priority Project
    MINISTRY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HOUSING (MLGH) LUSAKAMINISTRY CITY OF LOCALCOUNCIL GOVERNM (LCC) ENT AND HOUSING (MLGH) LUSAKA CITY COUNCIL (LCC) JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) THE STUDY ON COMPREHENSIVE URBAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN THE STUDY ON COMPREHENSIVEFOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN THE CITYFOR OF LUSAKA THE CITY OFIN LUSAKA THE REPUBLICIN OF ZAMBIA THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA FINAL REPORT FINAL REPORT VSUMMARYOLUME III VOLUME III PRE-FEAIBILITY STUDY OF PRIORITY PROJECT PRE-FEAIBILITY STUDY OF PRIORITY PROJECT MARCH 2009 MARCH 2009 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY KRI INTERNATIONAL CORP. KRINIPPON INTERNATIONAL KOEI CO., LTD.CORP. JAPAN ENGINEERINGNIPPON KOEI CONSULTANTS CO., LTD. CO., LTD. JAPAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CO., LTD. EXCHANGE RATE USD 1 = ZMK 3,582 = JPY 106.53 ZMK: Average rate of Bank of Zambia, from January 2008 to October 2008 JPY: Average rate of JICA rate, from January 2008 to October 2008 PREFACE In response to a request from the Government of the Republic of Zambia, the Government of Japan decided to conduct the ‘‘Study on Comprehensive Urban Development Plan for the City of Lusaka in the Republic of Zambia’’ and entrusted it to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected a study team consisting of the Joint Venture (JV) of KRI International Corp., Nippon Koei Co., Ltd., and Japan Engineering Consultants Co., Ltd. The team, headed by Mr. Isamu Asakura of the KRI International Corp., was dispatched to Zambia during the period from August 2007 and March 2009. The team conducted field surveys and formulated the comprehensive urban master plan of Greater Lusaka based on the consensus built in a series of discussions with concerned officials of the Government of the Republic of Zambia, donor community members, citizens, and other stakeholders through workshops, seminars, and exhibitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiefdoms/Chiefs in Zambia
    CHIEFDOMS/CHIEFS IN ZAMBIA 1. CENTRAL PROVINCE A. Chibombo District Tribe 1 HRH Chief Chitanda Lenje People 2 HRH Chieftainess Mungule Lenje People 3 HRH Chief Liteta Lenje People B. Chisamba District 1 HRH Chief Chamuka Lenje People C. Kapiri Mposhi District 1 HRH Senior Chief Chipepo Lenje People 2 HRH Chief Mukonchi Swaka People 3 HRH Chief Nkole Swaka People D. Ngabwe District 1 HRH Chief Ngabwe Lima/Lenje People 2 HRH Chief Mukubwe Lima/Lenje People E. Mkushi District 1 HRHChief Chitina Swaka People 2 HRH Chief Shaibila Lala People 3 HRH Chief Mulungwe Lala People F. Luano District 1 HRH Senior Chief Mboroma Lala People 2 HRH Chief Chembe Lala People 3 HRH Chief Chikupili Swaka People 4 HRH Chief Kanyesha Lala People 5 HRHChief Kaundula Lala People 6 HRH Chief Mboshya Lala People G. Mumbwa District 1 HRH Chief Chibuluma Kaonde/Ila People 2 HRH Chieftainess Kabulwebulwe Nkoya People 3 HRH Chief Kaindu Kaonde People 4 HRH Chief Moono Ila People 5 HRH Chief Mulendema Ila People 6 HRH Chief Mumba Kaonde People H. Serenje District 1 HRH Senior Chief Muchinda Lala People 2 HRH Chief Kabamba Lala People 3 HRh Chief Chisomo Lala People 4 HRH Chief Mailo Lala People 5 HRH Chieftainess Serenje Lala People 6 HRH Chief Chibale Lala People I. Chitambo District 1 HRH Chief Chitambo Lala People 2 HRH Chief Muchinka Lala People J. Itezhi Tezhi District 1 HRH Chieftainess Muwezwa Ila People 2 HRH Chief Chilyabufu Ila People 3 HRH Chief Musungwa Ila People 4 HRH Chief Shezongo Ila People 5 HRH Chief Shimbizhi Ila People 6 HRH Chief Kaingu Ila People K.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Annual Harvest Assessment Report
    ZAMBIA ANNUAL HARVEST ASSESSMENT REPORT October 2004 Summary For the second consecutive season, Zambia produced a good harvest after the two bad seasons of 2000/01 and 2001/02, both drought years. Although the growing season started poorly in many parts of the country in terms of rainfall distribution and quantities, as the season progressed, crops showed great improvement, even in the south. In line with the surplus harvest, the price of maize dropped noticeably in May and June. However, in July, prices in rural areas rose as a result of the price distortion (Government floor price) and FRA purchase program. Despite this, the maize prices so far have been relatively low, due to the surplus harvest, and are still below the ten year average. Although this will guarantee improved access to staple food for the majority of the population, the low prices put the small scale farmers who are the major maize producers at risk of failing to engage in meaningful production in the coming season. Background: Zambia’s production system Zambia’s crop production is largely rain dependent with a distinct production season running from November to April. Rainfall performance is the major determinant of the crop performance in any given year. The country is divided into three distinct agro ecological zones differentiated by the rainfall pattern and soil type-see figure 1. Region 1 covers the valley areas located in the Figure 1 : Zambia Agro-ecological Zones extreme southern and western parts of the country. This is generally a dry area with less than 800mm annual rainfall and best suitable for production of N small grains and livestock rearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Target Districts Revised Report
    SYSTEMS FOR BETTER HEALTH Project Implementation Working Paper Selection of Target Districts Revised Report March 2016 This project implementation working paper was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Abt Associates for the USAID Systems for Better Health activity. Selection of Target Districts Contract/Project No.: Task Order No. AID611-TO-16-00001 Contract No. AID-OAA-I-14-00032 Submitted to: William Kanweka, Contracting Officer’s Representative USAID/Zambia Prepared by: Abt Associates In collaboration with: American College of Nurse-Midwives Akros Inc. BroadReach Institute for Training and Education Initiatives Inc. Imperial Health Sciences Save the Children DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government USAID Systems for Better Health ▌pg. i Selection of Target Districts USAID Systems for Better Health ▌pg. ii Selection of Target Districts Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Background regarding target districts ................................................................................................... 5 1.2 SBH activities at each level of the health system
    [Show full text]
  • In Zambia a Review of the Biggest REDD+ Project in Africa Financed by the Italian Oil and Gas Company ENI the Luangwa Community Forests Project (LCFP) in Zambia
    The Luangwa Community Forests Project (LCFP) in Zambia A review of the biggest REDD+ project in Africa financed by the Italian oil and gas company ENI The Luangwa Community Forests Project (LCFP) in Zambia A review of the biggest REDD+ project in Africa financed by the Italian oil and gas company ENI Author: Kelvin Mulungu Commissioned by: Greenpeace Italy May 2021 INDEX 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Zambia and the Luangwa Community 4 1.2 Introduction to the review of Luangwa Community Forests Project (LCFP) 5 1.3 Mechanisms of the Luangwa Community Forests Project (LCFP) 7 2. Partners and Players in the LCFPs 11 3. Methodology 13 4. General Issue: Voluntary Carbon Markets (VCMs) 14 5. ENI’s Promise of Carbon Offsets in the LCFP 17 6. Issues with the LCFP 23 6.1 Choice of the reference area 23 6.2 Projected deforestation 25 6.2.1 Reported baseline deforestation rate 26 6.2.2 Choice of the baseline approach 27 6.2.3 Fire risk 28 6.2.4 Forests biomass 29 6.3 Other issues with the LCFP 30 6.4 Potential community problems of the LCFP 30 7. Conclusion 33 8. Appendix I: Lusaka and Eastern Provinces of Zambia 34 9. Appendix II: Questions posed to ENI S.p.A. 36 10. References 38 3 1. INTRODUCTION This is a report commissioned by Greenpeace Italy to review the Luangwa Communi- ty Forests Project (LCFP) in Zambia with a special interest in checking for any inconsi- stencies in terms of assumptions, projected carbon credits to be generated, and any unintended effects on the community.
    [Show full text]