Article in the Cyprus Journal of Wealth Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Article in the Cyprus Journal of Wealth Management | 118 | ESTATE PLANNING & SUCCESSION | 119 | The distribution of assets is, in my opinion, one of the most CASE STUDY X (husband) and Y (wife) started their co- complicated aspects habitation in January 1998, got engaged in April of the same year and got married of family law in Cyprus in July 2000. In October 2010, they moved into their matrimonial home. They sep- arated in May 2011 and their marriage the property of the spouse at the time of the cele- It will all depend on the facts and circumstances of was dissolved in 2013. The matrimonial bration of the marriage and at the time of the sep- the particular case, the testimonies of the witnesses home, which is registered in Y’s name, In Cyprus, aration in order to determine the increase, if any. who may testify before the Court in a potential was reconstructed by X’s own personal However, if there is no increase or the property of claim, as well as on the wording of the agreement. efforts and by entering into several loans. legislation Some of the loans were joint with Y. X the spouse has decreased, then Article 14 does not In particular, the parties cannot present evidence of repaid most of the loans. The plot of land does not apply and the other spouse cannot claim anything. their own subjective intentions, given that the gen- on which the house in dispute was built If an ex-spouse remarries, they do not lose their eral rule is that the intention of the parties is to be was purchased in August 1998; half was speciFically right to the property they had with their spouse, judged objectively. Assuming that the parties have purchased by Y’s father and the remain- ing half was purchased by the parties, refer to as long as they can successfully prove during signed a legally binding agreement, their rights but the plot of land was registered in Y’s court proceedings that the preconditions briefly shall be deemed protected by a formal document, name. The purchase price of the whole prenuptial described above have been met. It is important to the breach of which will have legal consequences plot of land was initially paid by Y’s father, mention that “property” does not only refer to the for the party in default, i.e. damages and/or specific but the parties subsequently took out agreements a loan and the amount of the loan was property acquired during the marriage, but also to performance. It may also be relied upon as proof paid to Y’s father. Y refused to pay X any and, any property which a spouse acquired before the that the other party/spouse duly and willingly amount of money for his contribution in marriage “with the prospect of a marriage”. For agreed not to request any contribution to the prop- reconstructing the matrimonial home. therefore, example, when the parties first cohabit and then erty stated within the agreement. We represented X in his property dis- pute with Y before the Family Court of does not get engaged. Nicosia. Having collected the necessary Any claim in relation to property disputes between How can you protect your assets in a divorce material, X appointed a property valuer to ofFIcially spouses must be brought within three years of the settlement? evaluate the disputed matrimonial home. dissolution or nullification of the marriage and any Assets can be protected by means of an agreement Subsequently, an application under the recognize Matrimonial Property Law was filed with claims cannot be inherited or assigned unless they to settle property disputes, pursuant to which any the Family Court of Nicosia, pursuant to or give have been contractually recognized or if a claim has assets obtained before the marriage are the property which X claimed the part of the increase any special already been served. of the party that acquired them. As such, they will of the disputed matrimonial home which fall outside of the pool of assets to be distributed resulted from his contribution. Y filed a defence, denying the substan- status to What rights to the estate do children from pre- among the parties. The parties may further decide tive allegations made by X. Her line of vious marriages have? on the distribution of property acquired jointly defence was that the plot of land was them The Matrimonial Property Law only governs during the marriage. It is worth mentioning that if purchased by her and her father before property disputes between spouses who are sep- the parties settle their property disputes by written the parties’ engagement and without the applicant having contributed to the arated or ex-spouses and, as such, does not grant agreement, the distribution of the matrimonial one third of the increase. This may be acquisition. She further alleged that the children any rights to matrimonial property upon assets no longer fall within the ambit of the Mat- rebutted if the applicant can prove, house was reconstructed by her father’s a separation or divorce. Pursuant to the Wills and rimonial Property Law and the Family Court but personal efforts and not by those of X. on the balance of probabilities, that Succession Law, Cap.195, children are legal heirs within the jurisdiction of the District Court. Oth- The applicant, an employee from the their contribution was more than one Land Registry of Nicosia and two other of their parents and have rights only to property erwise, movable and immovable property obtained third (Article 14(2) of the Matrimo- bank employees testified before the registered in their parents’ names. Nor do they by either spouse before the marriage and with the nial Property Law). If, for example, Family Court during trial and in support inherit any rights to issue a claim pursuant to the prospect of marriage, or any time after the marriage of the applicant’s case. Our valuer’s Going the wife can prove on the balance of Matrimonial Property Law, unless such a right has was formed, is divided in accordance with the Mat- evaluation was finally accepted by Y. To probabilities that it is was her family support her case, Y gave her own testi- been expressly recognised by contract or a claim rimonial Property Law. Parties normally resort to who paid for the house and that the mony before the Family Court and further hat rights to the estate does a former has already been served. court with an application for an order to that effect. husband did not contribute to its called her father and an employee of a spouse have when he/she remarries? private construction company as wit- Separate acquisition/value increase, then she nesses. PropertyW disputes between spouses are Is a prenuptial agreement legally enforceable in What other common problems arise in estate can rebut the one-third presumption The Family Court accepted our position regulated by the Matrimonial Prop- Cyprus? If not, are there any exceptions? planning in divorce cases? and the other party may not have any and decided that there was a dissolution erty Law of 1991, Law No.232/91. In Cyprus, legislation does not specifically refer The distribution of assets is, in my opinion, one claim to the house. of the marriage, the matrimonial home When a marriage is dissolved or nulli- to prenuptial agreements and, therefore, does not of the most complicated aspects of family law in was built on land which was actually Under Article 14 of the said Law, fied or when the spouses separate and officially recognize or give any special status to Cyprus. Some of the problems that we common- bought before the marriage with the participation in the increase in prop- prospect of marriage, there was an one spouse’s property has increased them. However, if such an agreement is made with ly encounter in such cases include the difficulty erty must be sought and the claim increase of value in the disputed prop- during the course of the marriage, the the free consent of the parties – who are competent of one spouse compensating the other for their erty (the matrimonial home) and that X Way s must be directed against the spouse or contributed in the increase of the prop- other spouse may file an application to contract for a lawful consideration and with a contribution to the matrimonial home when co- the ex-spouse, and not against third to the Family Court and request part lawful object – and is otherwise not void, it will habitation is no longer an option, when one of the erty with money as well as through his parties (the case of P. Gregoriou v D. personal efforts. Therefore, the Judge of the increase which resulted from be valid and binding just like any other contract, two spouses refuses to leave the matrimonial home Gregoriou (2001) 1 JSC 1461 is rel- decided that all the preconditions of Arti- their own contribution, considering under the Cyprus Contract Law Cap. 149. That which is registered in the name of the other spouse, evant). It is important to note that it cle 14(1) of the Law No. 232/91 had been Marilena Miltiadou, Senior Associate at Chrysostomides, that they can prove they contributed said, the parties must have had the intention to where there is no evidence proving the contribu- met, and issued a judgement in favour of explains the rights of ex-spouses to an estate, whether a is the increase of the property and not to the increase. In the case when one create legal relations, which is more difficult to tion of one spouse in the creation of the property X for the amount of €115,000 plus legal prenuptial agreement is enforceable, how to protect your the property itself that is the subject interest, as well as ordering legal costs party can prove the increase but not prove, because in domestic agreements of this type and when there are outstanding loans during the assets in a divorce procedure and other common problems in favour of X and against Y.
Recommended publications
  • Principles of U.S. Family Law Vivian E
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2006 Principles of U.S. Family Law Vivian E. Hamilton William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Repository Citation Hamilton, Vivian E., "Principles of U.S. Family Law" (2006). Faculty Publications. 184. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/184 Copyright c 2006 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs ARTICLE PRINCIPLES OF U.S. FAMILY LAW Vivian Hamilton* What explains US. family law? What are the orzgms of the current chaos and controversy in the field, the home of some of the most vituperative debates in public policy? To answer these questions, this Article identifies and examines family law's foundational principles. It undertakes a conceptual analysis ofthe legal practices that govern families. This analysis has yet to be done, and its absence hamstrings constructive thought on our family law. The Article develops a typology that conceptualizes US. family law and exposes its underlying principles. First, it identifies the significant elements, or rules, of family law. Second, it demonstrates that these rules reflect or embody four important concepts­ conjugality, privacy (familial as well as individual), contract, and parens patriae. Third, it shows that the concepts offamily law in turn embody two distinct underlying principles-Biblical traditionalism and liberal individualism. From these powerful principles, we can derive modern U.S. family law: They explain what our family law is. With this deepened understanding offamily law's structure, the Article next evaluates these principles, and family law as the expression ofthem.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing the Self-Help Legal Market: Consumer Protection Or Protection of the Legal Cartel?
    POLICING THE SELF-HELP LEGAL MARKET: CONSUMER PROTECTION OR PROTECTION OF THE LEGAL CARTEL? JULEE C. FISCHER* INTRODUCTION The emergence of information technology in the legal field is spearheading new approaches to the practice of law, but the legal community is questioning whether the new technology may be a double-edged sword. The Information Revolution is reshaping traditional lawyer functions, forcing innovations in everything from research and document management to marketing and client communications. Yet, just as technology drives change inside law firms, consumers too are seizing the knowledge that is increasingly at their fingertips. The market is flourishing for self-help legal counsel. An increasing array of Internet Web sites often dispense legal advice and information free of charge. This advice ranges from estate planning and contract issues to custody battles and torts. Further, the legal industry is witness to the advent of do-it-yourself legal software packages marketed directly to consumers. Innovative? Yes. Easier? Certainly. But to what extent is this a blessing or a curse, both to lawyers and consumers?1 Self-help law can be defined as “any activity by a person in pursuit of a legal goal or the completion of a legal task that [does not] involve legal advice or representation by a lawyer.”2 Consumers participating in the self-help market are typically driven by factors such as relative cost, self-reliance, necessity, and distrust of lawyers.3 Clearly, such products offer the public up-front benefits of convenience and availability. Nevertheless, larger issues arise concerning who is responsible for the advice and whether it is dispensed by lawyers.
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION III DIVISION of PROPERTY Introductory Comment This Third
    Family Law Guidelines 2010 Copyright 2010 Johnson County Bar Association © SECTION III DIVISION OF PROPERTY Introductory Comment This third section of the Family Law Guidelines relates to the division of property.1 The Family Law Guidelines is the work of the Family Law Bench-Bar Committee of the Johnson County Bar Association. The Committee is composed of lawyers, judges, and mental health professionals who share a strong interest in family law. The first step in making a property division is to determine all of the assets and liabilities owned by the parties. The laws of Kansas make it clear that all property belonging to either or both of the parties, irrespective of how it was acquired or how it is titled, is subject to division by the Court at the time of divorce. These guidelines, though discretionary in nature, do make a distinction between mutual (marital) and individual (non-marital) property. The definition of mutual (marital) property is set forth at paragraph 3.2(a) and the definition of individual (non-marital) property is set forth at paragraph 3.3(a). The tax effects related to the division of property in family law cases should be considered and the committee would recommend practitioners consult the applicable section or sections of the Internal Revenue Code, other resources on taxes, and/or experts in the area of tax calculations and effects. 3.1 Division of Net Worth vs. Maintenance. A division of property operates retrospectively to adjust the rights of the parties to property already accumulated and accrued property not yet received, while maintenance is prospective and deals with future support.
    [Show full text]
  • General Family Law Resources
    GENERAL FAMILY LAW RESOURCES King County Superior Court Family Law Facilitators The Family Law Facilitator Program at King County Superior Court provides information and referrals to family law litigants who are not represented by attorneys. No legal advice is provided. Litigants may meet with a facilitator on a walk-in basis or by pre-scheduled appointment. No income requirements. $30 fee for appointments, reduced depending on income. For more information or to make an appointment: 206-263-FLIC (3542) www.kingcounty.gov/courts/Familycourt/facilitator King County Superior Court Public Law Library - Legal Research and Training Center Classes such as “Legal Research for the Non-Attorney” are offered. No income requirements. For more information: (206) 296-0940 or www.kcll.org/learnhow/lrtc/ King County Superior Court Public Law Library – General Legal Clinic A walk-in legal clinic in the Law Library on the 6th Floor of the King County Courthouse in Seattle from 11:30- 1:30 every Wednesday. No appointment necessary. For more information call (206) 477-1305. King County Bar Association Neighborhood Legal Clinic Neighborhood Legal Clinics provide FREE 30-minute consultation with an attorney at 39 locations across King County. Attorneys determine whether the client has a legal problem, suggest possible options, and provide appropriate referrals. These attorneys will not represent you in court. Call for income requirements and to schedule an appointment Tues. – Thurs. 9am-12pm: (206) 267 – 7070 or www.kcba.org/pbs/nlc.aspx King County Bar Association Self Help Plus Program Pro se assistance for low to moderate income King County residents with divorce cases or parenting plan cases when paternity has been established.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Law As Family Law Andrea L
    Georgia State University Law Review Volume 33 Article 2 Issue 2 Winter 2016-2017 3-9-2017 Criminal Law as Family Law Andrea L. Dennis University of Georgia School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr Part of the Civil Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, and the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Andrea L. Dennis, Criminal Law as Family Law, 33 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 285 (2017). Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol33/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dennis: Criminal Law as Family Law CRIMINAL LAW AS FAMILY LAW Andrea L. Dennis* INTRODUCTION Paul wanted to live with either his mother or his girlfriend in his old neighborhood, but his supervision officer told him he could not live in the neighborhood because that is where he would get in trouble. Instead, Paul lived in a three-quarter rooming house, hoping his mom or girlfriend would soon move so he could live with one of them.1 James wanted to visit his daughter who lived out of state, but his supervision officer would not authorize the travel.2 Alex was arrested on a parole-violation warrant while at the hospital with his girlfriend awaiting the birth of their child.3 Chuck worried that when he visited with his daughter at a court- supervised daycare, police would arrest him in front of his daughter for a warrant violation.4 The stories of Paul, James, Alex, and Chuck—all of whom were being supervised in the community as part of a criminal case—reveal the extent to which the criminal justice system can interfere with family life and family autonomy.5 Their stories, though, are but a small sample of what individuals and families under criminal justice control experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiduciary Issues in Family Law Cases
    Fiduciary Issues in Family Law Cases Richard R. Orsinger [email protected] http://www.orsinger.com Orsinger, Nelson Downing & Anderson, L.L.P. San Antonio Office: 310 S. Saint Mary’s St., #2600 San Antonio, Texas 78205 (210) 225-5567 http://www.orsinger.com and Dallas Office: 5950 Sherry Lane, Suite 800 Dallas, Texas 75225 (214) 273-2400 Fiduciary Litigation Course December 5-6, 2013 Westin Riverwalk San Antonio, Texas © 2013 Richard R. Orsinger All Rights Reserved CURRICULUM VITAE OF RICHARD R. ORSINGER Education: Washington & Lee University, Lexington, Virginia (1968-70) University of Texas (B.A., with Honors, 1972) University of Texas School of Law (J.D., 1975) Licensed: Texas Supreme Court (1975); U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas (1977-1992; 2000- present); U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas (1979); U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (1979); U.S. Supreme Court (1981) Certified: Board Certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization Family Law (1980), Civil Appellate Law (1987) Organizations and Committees: Chair, Family Law Section, State Bar of Texas (1999-2000) Chair, Appellate Practice & Advocacy Section, State Bar of Texas (1996-97) Chair, Continuing Legal Education Committee, State Bar of Texas (2000-02) Vice-Chair, Continuing Legal Education Committee, State Bar of Texas (2002-03) Member, Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure (1994-2015 and appointed through 2018); Chair, Subcommittee on Rules 16-165a Member, Pattern Jury Charge Committee (Family Law), State Bar
    [Show full text]
  • Debunking Texas' Family Law Myths
    Debunking Texas’ Family Law Myths 1. You can only get a divorce in Texas if you were married parties is community property until the spouse claiming in Texas. FALSE. Texas courts have jurisdiction over a the funds as his or her separate property proves the divorce action if either spouse resided in Texas for a funds are separate in nature by clear and convincing continuous six-month period prior to the filing of the evidence. If separate property funds are commingled divorce petition. with community property funds, it is the separate property owner’s burden to trace the funds to show the 2. In custody actions, the law favors mothers. FALSE. Texas original source and the current value of the separate law expressly provides that a family court shall not property funds. consider a parent’s gender in making decisions regarding custody. Judges must determine what is in the best 6. Parties are required to have a hearing if a petition is filed. interest of the child, taking all facts and circumstances TRUE and FALSE. If the parties reach an agreement on of the child and the parties into consideration. Judges all issues in a divorce case, one party must attend an presume that both parents should be named joint uncontested hearing to testify about the elements of the managing conservators with relatively equal rights and agreement and request that the agreement be signed and duties. The parent who has historically been the primary made into an order. In non-divorce cases, agreements caregiver of the child is usually granted the exclusive can be submitted to the court for signature by filing and right to designate the primary residence of the child.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion to Open Judgment in Family Matters a Guide to Resources in the Law Library
    Connecticut Judicial Branch Law Libraries Copyright © 2017-2020, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. All rights reserved. 2020 Edition Motion to Open Judgment in Family Matters A Guide to Resources in the Law Library Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................... 3 Section 1: Motion to Open or Set Aside Judgment ................................................ 4 Table 1: Opening an Acknowledgement of Paternity ........................................ 10 Section 2: Postjudgment Discovery — Motion to Open Based on Fraud.................. 12 Table 2: Opening Judgment for the Limited Purpose of Discovery – Case Law ..... 16 Table 3: Fraud – Case Law ........................................................................... 17 Prepared by Connecticut Judicial Branch, Superior Court Operations, Judge Support Services, Law Library Services Unit [email protected] Motion to Open - 1 These guides are provided with the understanding that they represent only a beginning to research. It is the responsibility of the person doing legal research to come to his or her own conclusions about the authoritativeness, reliability, validity, and currency of any resource cited in this research guide. View our other research guides at https://jud.ct.gov/lawlib/selfguides.htm This guide links to advance release opinions on the Connecticut Judicial Branch website and to case law hosted on Google Scholar and Harvard’s Case Law Access Project. The online versions are for
    [Show full text]
  • Petitioner, VS
    No. 3hi Tbe 'upreme Court of the Muiteb btateig DAVID BRANDON, Petitioner, VS. SARAH BRANDON, Respondent. - A On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari From The Court Of Appeal Of California, Second Appellate District PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI DAVID BRANDON Self Represented 7521 Bovey Avenue Reseda, CA 91335 [email protected] 818-792-2737 1 QUESTION PRESENTED California Family Code Section 2210(d) generally provides that an annulment based on fraud may be had in extreme cases where the particular fraud goes to the very essence of the marriage relationship. (In re Marriage of Meagher and Maleki (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 1, 3.) It is contended that whether the party(ies) intend to continue the married state beyond obtaining a green card goes to the essence of the marriage relationship. California does not recognize this as a form of mar- riage fraud rising to the level of annulment. It is fur- ther contended that because Immigration Marriage Fraud is a Federal issue and dissolution of marriage is a State issue, individual US citizens have no recourse against foreign nationals that violate Federal Immi- gration Laws regarding fraudulent marriage because States do not recognize Immigration Marriage Fraud. States, in particular California, do not recognize Federal Immigration Marriage Fraud as a basis for granting annulment by reason of fraud. The question, therefore, presented is: Are the States, in particular California, required to recognize Immigration Marriage Fraud as a basis for annulment in their dissolution of marriage stat- utes? 11 PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING PETITIONER: David Brandon RESPONDENT: Sarah Brandon U' TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Opinionsbelow.....................................................1 Jurisdiction..........................................................1 Statutory provisions involved..............................1 Statement............................................................8 Reasons for granting the petition .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Building Partnerships to Enhance Consumer Rights for Domestic Violence Survivors
    Building Partnerships to Enhance Consumer Rights for Domestic Violence Survivors An Assessment and Resource Tool for Attorneys and Advocates The Consumer Rights for Domestic Violence Survivors Initiative Developed by in partnership with National Consumer Law Center National Network to End Domestic Violence National Association of Consumer Advocates Consumer Rights for Domestic Violence Survivors Initiative is a national project that seeks to enhance consumer rights for domestic violence survivors by building the capacity of and developing collaborative partnerships between domestic violence and consumer lawyers and advocates. This project is supported by Grant #2009-­‐VF-­‐GX-­‐K005 awarded by the Office ctims for Vi of Crime, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THIS TOOL Consumer Rights for Domestic Violence Survivors Initiative (CRDVSI) is a national project that seeks to enhance consumer rights for domestic violence survivors by building the capacity of and developing collaborative partnerships between domestic violence and consumer lawyers and advocates. Launched in 2007 with funding from the Office for Victims of Crime, US Department Justice, CRDVSI began as a partnership between the Center for Survivor Agency and Justice (CSAJ), the National Consumer Law Center, and the National Association of Consumer Advocates. In 2009, the National Network to End Domestic Violence joined the partnership. In the Fall of 2011, CSAJ received an award from the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW), US Department of Justice, which will enable CSAJ to extend the work of CRDVSI to OVW grantees and other service providers and expand the nitiative’s I focus on innovative efforts to build partnerships.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraud, Fiduciaries, and Family Law*
    FRAUD, FIDUCIARIES, AND FAMILY LAW* JusticeAnn CrawfordMcCluret and John F. Nichols, Sr." I. INTRODUCTION .....................................-.....-....-............................. 1082 II. DEFINING THE DUTY .............................-........................................ 1085 III. FORMAL "FIDUCIARY" RELATIONSHIPS ........................................ 1086 A. Condominium Boards .......................................................... 1086 B. Partnersand Joint Venturers............................................... 1087 1. GeneralPartnerships ........................ 1087 2. Limited Partnership .................... ....... 1089 C. CorporateOfficers.................... ............ 1091 D. Agents....................................... 1092 E. Executors and Trustees ................ .......... 1093 F. A ttorneys ...................... .............. .. ............................... 1094 G . Emp loyees .....................-....... --....... ................................... 1095 IV. INFORMAL FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIPS ........................................ 1095 V . THE EARLY CASES.............******.....---------......-................................. 1096 A. Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp. ....................... 1096 B. Slay v. Burnett Trust.............................................................. 1096 C. Thigpen v. Locke .................................-................................ 1097 D. International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. Holloway.......... 1098 VI. EVOLUTION OF FIDUCIARY AND ECONOMIC
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing a Lamb to Slaughter: How Family Law Attorneys Unknowingly Lead Clients to Financial Disaster in the Negotiation of a Divorce Stipulation
    BRINGING A LAMB TO SLAUGHTER: HOW FAMILY LAW ATTORNEYS UNKNOWINGLY LEAD CLIENTS TO FINANCIAL DISASTER IN THE NEGOTIATION OF A DIVORCE STIPULATION Jennifer L. Bjurling*† INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 939 I. THE BANKRUPTCY CODE IN RELATION TO FAMILY LAW...................... 941 II. THE IMPACT OF A FAMILY LAW ATTORNEY’S KNOWLEDGE OF BANKRUPTCY LAW ON DIVORCE SETTLEMENT ................................. 945 III. DISCHARGEABILITY UNDER CHAPTER 13, AND STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME IT ..................................................................................... 947 A. Best: Property That Is Not Property of the Bankruptcy Estate ........ 947 1. Award of Asset in Totality ........................................................... 947 a. Trustee Challenges to Asset Transfer ........................................... 950 b. Fraudulent Conveyance ................................................................ 951 c. Preference ..................................................................................... 953 2. Quitclaim Deed in Exchange for Cash ......................................... 956 3. Part In and Part Out: Tenancy in Common Used as Security ...... 957 B. Better: Part of the Estate But Secured .............................................. 958 1. Mortgage ...................................................................................... 959 2. Judicial Lien ................................................................................. 962 C. Good:
    [Show full text]