DOCSLIB.ORG

The Family and Marriage Family and Marriage Across Cultures • in All Societies, the Family Has Been the Most Important of All Social Institutions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Family and Marriage Family and Marriage Across Cultures • in All Societies, the Family Has Been the Most Important of All Social Institutions The Family and Marriage Family and Marriage Across Cultures • In all societies, the family has been the most important of all social institutions. • It produces • new generations • socializes the young • provides care and affection • regulates sexual behavior • transmits social status • provides economic support. Defining the Family For sociologists, family is defined as a group of people related by marriage, blood, or adoption. While the concept of family may appear simple on the surface, the family is a complex social unit that is difficult to define. Marriage is a legal union/contract sanction by the state. In all states you have to get a license. This legal contract is based on legal rights and obligations. The Family of Orientation The family of orientation is the birth family. It gives the child an ascribed status in the community. It orients children to their neighborhoods, communities, and society and locates them in the world. The Family of Procreation The family of procreation is established upon marriage. The marriage ceremony legally sanctions a couple to have offspring and to give children a family name. It becomes the family of orientation for the children created from the marriage. There are Two Basic Types of Families The nuclear family is composed of a parent or parents and any children. The extended family consists of two or more adult generations of the same family whose members share economic resources and live in the same household. Who inherits? In a patrilineal arrangement, descent and inheritance are passed from the father to his male descendants. In a matrilineal arrangement, descent and inheritance are transmitted from the mother to her female descendants. In some societies, descent and inheritance are bilateral–they are passed equally through both parents. Who is in authority? In a patriarchy, the oldest man living in the household has authority over the rest of the family members. In a matriarchy, the oldest woman living in the household holds the authority. With equalitarian control, authority is split evenly between husband and wife. Where do couples live? The patrilocal pattern calls for living with or near the husband’s parents. (blue) Residing with or near the wife’s parents is expected under a matrilocal pattern. (red) In the neolocal pattern married couples establish residences of their own. What forms does marriage take? Monogamy–the marriage of one man to one woman–is the most widely practiced form of marriage and the only legal form in many societies. Some often-married people practice serial monogamy–having several husbands or wives, but being married to only one at a time. Polygamy involves the marriage of a male or female to more than one person at a time. – Polygyny is the marriage of one man to two or more women at the same time. – Polyandry is the marriage of one woman to two or more men at the same time. Choosing A Mate Exogamy is the practice of marrying someone outside one’s group. Endogamy requires an individual to marry within one’s group. The tendency of people to marry those with social characteristics similar to their own is homogamy. In heterogamy, partners are dissimilar in some important characteristics, such as age, race, social class, and ethnicity. Indicate whether exogamy (Ex), endogamy (En), or homogamy (H) is reflected in each of the following situations. ____H a. Catholics are supposed to marry Catholics. ____Ex b. A father is not permitted to marry his daughter. ____H c. Members of the same social class marry. ____Ex d. A brother and sister are legally prohibited from marrying. ____En e. People tend to marry others of the same age. ____H f. Rich people marry other wealthy people. Family and Marriage in the United States Although the United States is a diverse society, the American family possesses many similiarities. Families are nuclear. Families are bilateral. Families are democratic. Families are neolocal. Families are monogamous. Romantic Love and Marriage People marry for many reasons. In the United States, the norm is for love to precede the marriage vows. One of the strongest motivations for marriage is conformity–parents and peers expect/pressure children to marry after a certain age. Some marry for wealth, power, or career advancement. The marriage rate is the number of marriages per year for every one thousand members of the population. Divorce The divorce rate is the number of divorces per year for every one thousand members of the population. Four main factors affect divorce in American society. – The divorce rate rises during economic prosperity and goes down when times are hard. – The rise in the divorce rate after 1960 followed the growing up of the baby-boom generation. – The increasing financial independence of women means they are more willing to end bad marriages. – American values and attitudes about marriage and divorce are changing–society is much more forgiving of divorce and remarriage. What does the future for marriage look like? There is a good chance that the recent decline in the United States divorce rate may continue for several reasons. The average age at first marriage is increasing. The average age of the population is increasing. As baby boomers grow older–they are no longer in the age bracket that produces the highest divorce rate. American couples are having few children and spacing them farther apart, reducing one pressure on marriages. Family Violence Americans have traditionally denied the existence of widespread violence in the family setting, but we are learning that domestic violence occurs at all class levels and affects all family members. National statistics indicate that 47 of every 1,000 children are reported as victims of child maltreatment annually. At least four million women are battered by their husbands annually. Husbands are also victims of abuse from their wives. Verbal and psychological abuse are other forms of domestic violence. Choose the word from each pair that best describes the typical American family. a. nuclear or extended b. patrilineal or bilateral c. authoritarian or democratic d. neolocal or matrilocal e. polygynous or monogamous Changes in Marriage and Family Many new patterns of marriage and family have emerged in the United States including the following: blended families, single-parent families, child-free families, dual-employed marriages, cohabitation, same-sex domestic partners, single individuals, and families with boomerang children. Blended Families A blended family is formed when at least one of the marriage partners has been married before and has a child or children from the previous marriage. Blended families create a new type of extended family, not strictly based on blood relationships. Blended families face three major problems: – money difficulties – stepchildren’s antagonism, and – unclear roles. Single-Parent Families One in four American families is headed by a single parent. Eighty-five percent of single-parent families are headed by women. Thirty percent of children under the age 18 in America live in single-parent households. Adolescents, children between the ages of 12 and 17, living in single-parent households have higher rates of deviant behavior. Other Types of Families Childless marriages: In 1998 about 19 percent of women who have ever been married did not have children, offering a variety of reasons. Dual-employed marriages: In families where both parents are working outside the home there are benefits and drawbacks to this arrangement. Cohabitation: A marriage-like arrangement without the legal obligations of formal marriage has become an alternative to traditional monogamy. Other Types of Families Same-sex domestic partners: The number of same-sex domestic partners is increasing, although exact figures are not available. Single life: An increasing number of Americans choose to remain single. The term boomerang kids is being applied to young adults who either leave home and return or stay at home and live with parents. What is the future of the American family? While many Americans are experimenting with alternative living arrangements, the nuclear family remains the most popular choice. The American family is changing. The trend toward more working parents will continue, producing increased strain on parents, children, and society. The family will survive, but what forms will it take are unclear. Chapter Summary The family is the most important institution in all societies. Marriage forms the basis of the family of procreation, while birth offers the family of orientation. There are different types of families and patterns of family structure. The marriage ceremony is an important societal ritual. Theorists believe that family offers socioemotional structure, perpetuates male dominance, and helps develop self control. Continued on the next slide. Summary Chapter Summary American families tend to be nuclear, bilateral, democratic, neolocal, and monogamous. Family violence exists in many forms in America. American families are changing by assuming different forms. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Origins and Consequences of Kin Networks and Marriage Practices
    The origins and consequences of kin networks and marriage practices by Duman Bahramirad M.Sc., University of Tehran, 2007 B.Sc., University of Tehran, 2005 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Economics Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences c Duman Bahramirad 2018 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2018 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Duman Bahramirad Degree: Doctor of Philosophy (Economics) Title: The origins and consequences of kin networks and marriage practices Examining Committee: Chair: Nicolas Schmitt Professor Gregory K. Dow Senior Supervisor Professor Alexander K. Karaivanov Supervisor Professor Erik O. Kimbrough Supervisor Associate Professor Argyros School of Business and Economics Chapman University Simon D. Woodcock Supervisor Associate Professor Chris Bidner Internal Examiner Associate Professor Siwan Anderson External Examiner Professor Vancouver School of Economics University of British Columbia Date Defended: July 31, 2018 ii Ethics Statement iii iii Abstract In the first chapter, I investigate a potential channel to explain the heterogeneity of kin networks across societies. I argue and test the hypothesis that female inheritance has historically had a posi- tive effect on in-marriage and a negative effect on female premarital relations and economic partic- ipation. In the second chapter, my co-authors and I provide evidence on the positive association of in-marriage and corruption. We also test the effect of family ties on nepotism in a bribery experi- ment. The third chapter presents my second joint paper on the consequences of kin networks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Different Perspective on Exogamy: Are Non-Migrant Partners in Mixed Unions More Liberal in Their Attitudes Toward Gender, Family, and Religion Than Other Natives?
    Mirko K. Braack & Nadja Milewski A different perspective on exogamy: Are non-migrant partners in mixed unions more liberal in their attitudes toward gender, family, and religion than other natives? Abstract Classic assimilation theory perceives migrant-native intermarriage as both a means to and a result of immigrants’ integration processes into host societies. The literature is increasingly focusing on marital exogamy of immigrants, yet almost nothing is known about their native partners. This explorative study contributes to the literature on migrant integration and social cohesion in Europe by asking whether the native partners in exogamous unions have different attitudes toward gender equality, sexual liberaliza- tion, family solidarity, and religiosity/secularization than natives in endogamous unions. Our theoretical considerations are based on preference, social exchange, and modernization theories. We use data of the Generations and Gender Survey (GGS) of seven countries. The sample size is 38,447 natives aged 18 to 85, of whom about 4% are in a mixed union. The regression results of the study are mixed. Persons in exogamous unions show greater agreement with family solidarity, are thus less individualistic than those in endogamous couples. Yet, mixing is associated with greater openness to sexual liberalization and gen- der equality as well as more secular attitudes. These findings can only partially be explained by socio- demographic control variables. Hence, immigrants in exogamous unions with natives may integrate into the more liberal milieu of their host societies, in which natives continue to place a high value on provid- ing support to family members. Key words: Exogamy, gender equality, attitudes, partner choice, migrant assimilation, Generations and Gender Survey 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There an Association Between Marital Exogamy of Immigrants and Nonmigrants and Their Mental Health? a Two-Partners Approach
    DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH VOLUME 40, ARTICLE 21, PAGES 561-598 PUBLISHED 14 MARCH 2019 http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol40/21/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.21 Research Article Is there an association between marital exogamy of immigrants and nonmigrants and their mental health? A two-partners approach Nadja Milewski Annegret Gawron This publication is part of the Special Collection “A New Look Into the Dynamics of Mixed Couples in Europe,” organized by Guest Editors Amparo González-Ferrer, Laura Bernardi, and Alícia Adserà. © 2019 Nadja Milewski & Annegret Gawron. This open-access work is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany (CC BY 3.0 DE), which permits use, reproduction, and distribution in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are given credit. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/legalcode. Contents 1 Introduction 562 2 Background 563 2.1 Bridging interethnic social capital: The exogamy gain hypothesis 565 2.2 Cultural difference: The exogamy-strain hypothesis 566 2.3 Confounding and moderating effects related to marriage type 567 2.4 Compositional differences in individual covariates 569 2.5 Within-migrant variation 570 3 Data and methods 571 3.1 Data and sample 571 3.2 Variables 573 3.3 Modeling strategy 576 4 Results 577 4.1 Exogamy vs. endogamy 577 4.2 Within-migrant variation 582 4.3 Checks for robustness and further explorations 583 5 Discussion 584 6 Acknowledgements 589 References 590 Appendix 597 Demographic Research: Volume 40, Article 21 Research Article Is there an association between marital exogamy of immigrants and nonmigrants and their mental health? A two-partners approach Nadja Milewski1 Annegret Gawron2 Abstract OBJECTIVE We study mental health in immigrants and nonmigrants, distinguishing between people in exogamous and endogamous marriages.
    [Show full text]
  • Marten Stol WOMEN in the ANCIENT NEAR EAST
    Marten Stol WOMEN IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson ISBN 978-1-61451-323-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-61451-263-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0021-3 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Original edition: Vrouwen van Babylon. Prinsessen, priesteressen, prostituees in de bakermat van de cultuur. Uitgeverij Kok, Utrecht (2012). Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson © 2016 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin Cover Image: Marten Stol Typesetting: Dörlemann Satz GmbH & Co. KG, Lemförde Printing and binding: cpi books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Table of Contents Introduction 1 Map 5 1 Her outward appearance 7 1.1 Phases of life 7 1.2 The girl 10 1.3 The virgin 13 1.4 Women’s clothing 17 1.5 Cosmetics and beauty 47 1.6 The language of women 56 1.7 Women’s names 58 2 Marriage 60 2.1 Preparations 62 2.2 Age for marrying 66 2.3 Regulations 67 2.4 The betrothal 72 2.5 The wedding 93 2.6
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Marriages, Same-Sex Unions, and an Interstate Recognition Conundrum Mark P
    Boston College Third World Law Journal Volume 30 | Issue 2 Article 1 4-1-2010 Tribal Marriages, Same-Sex Unions, and an Interstate Recognition Conundrum Mark P. Strasser Capital University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/twlj Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Mark P. Strasser, Tribal Marriages, Same-Sex Unions, and an Interstate Recognition Conundrum, 30 B.C. Third World L.J. 207 (2010), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/twlj/vol30/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Third World Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRIBAL MARRIAGES, SAME-SEX UNIONS, AND AN INTERSTATE RECOGNITION CONUNDRUM Mark P. Strasser* Abstract: This Article focuses on the reasons for state and federal rec- ognition of Native American polygamous unions and the implications of states’ recognition of these unions for the validity of same-sex marriages across state lines. It discusses some historical Native American domestic relations practices and explains why states recognized certain Native American marital unions that would not have been recognized had they been celebrated locally. This Article also analyzes the significance of the recognition of these unions for the debate surrounding recognition of same-sex unions. The historical treatment of Native American polyga- mous unions suggests Congress has the power to assure that same-sex couples have the same rights and protections as do different-sex couples as long as their marriages were valid in the domicile at the time of cele- bration.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 3 Marriage
    UNIT 3 MARRIAGE Contents 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Concepts, Meaning and Definitions 3.2.1 Prescribed and Preferential Marriages 3.2.2 Types of Marriages 3.2.3 Ways of Acquiring a Mate 3.2.4 Divorce 3.3 Functions of Marriage 3.4 Changing Dimensions of Marriage 3.5 Summary References Suggested Reading Sample Questions Learning Objectives After reading this unit, the students should be able to: define the different rules and types associated with marriage; outline the various functions of a marriage; and discuss changing aspects of marriage in the contemporary times. 3.1 INTRODUCTION Marriage is a phenomena found in all types of societies though the pattern of marriage differs in different societies. The first section of the unit would introduce the students to the concept, definition and meaning of marriage, the various types of marraiges that are prevalent in different societies. Herein, we would be able to answer the question as to why marriage rules though not similar among the different societies yet have almost the same functions. With the changing times, marriage too has come under the hammer and the institution itself is going through various changes. These would be discussed in the last section of this unit. 3.2 CONCEPTS, MEANING AND DEFINITIONS Marriage by most anthropologists has been described as a universal phenomena yet the debate continues as to how marriage came into existence. In the early year’s social thinkers and anthropologists basically the followers of the theory of evolutionism were of the opinion that human beings lived in a state of promiscuity where individual marriage did not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Exchange1
    Generalized Exchange1 Peter Bearman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Generalized exchange, in which sections of a tribe exchange women in a cycle and thus guarantee social solidarity, was induced from models of the norms governing classi®catory kinship systems. A blockmodel analysis of one aboriginal tribe yields sections that serve as marriage classes in a generalized exchange system, though the norms that govern kinship would fail to manifest, if followed, a cycle for exchange. Generalized exchange systems emerge from inequali- ties exogenous to the kinship system, speci®cally gerontocracy. Mod- els of norms are weak predictors of actual exchange structures. Mod- els of relations yield insight into the etiology of systems that build social solidarity from social exchange. When I was in my mother's womb, social structure seemed a simple thing. (Gang of Four) INTRODUCTION This article focuses on identifying the conditions under which social soli- darity emerges from exchange relations. The empirical focus is on the observed behaviors of persons whose exchanges induce a stable social or- der. The setting (Groote Eylandt, an island off Australia), the persons (Aborigines), the language in which exchange is conducted (kinship), the relevant theoretical literature (classi®catory kinship theory), and the val- ues exchanged (women) are exotic for most sociologists. But many of the issues involvedÐthe relationship between normative orders governing action and actual behaviors, the identi®cation of micromechanisms that yield stable emergent structures, and the relationship between solidarity, exchange, and inequalityÐare central to problems we encounter in more familiar settings. 1 Harrison White, Richard Simpson, Sally Falk Moore, Eric Leifer, Charles Lindholm, Gerald Marwell, John Paul Boyd, Roger Gould, Peter Blau, Ron Breiger, Douglas White, and the AJS reviewers provided helpful advice on earlier drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Influences on Mate Selection: Outcomes for Homogamy and Same
    1 Family influences on mate selection: Outcomes for homogamy and same-sex coupling © 2015 Maja Falcon Stanford University Abstract: The outcomes of family involvement in relationship formation and mate selection are evaluated using Wave I (2009) of the nationally representative How Couples Meet and Stay Together survey (2013). Consistent with kin-keeping literature, female relatives are more likely to have introduced family members to their current partner than male relatives. Partners who met through family have lower levels of education than partners who met through other intermediaries. Older cohorts of couples who met through family are less likely to be interracial or interreligious; family involvement does not influence homogamous outcomes of younger cohorts of couples. Very few gay and lesbian individuals in same-sex couples met their partner through family. Bisexual women and men who met their partner through family are less likely to be in a same-sex relationship than bisexuals who met outside of family, even after controlling for education and age they met their current partner. Key words: Mate Selection, Dating/Relationship Formation, Same-sex relationships, Sexuality, Gender & Family 2 Introduction: This study focuses on family involvement in relationship formation and how meeting through a family member can influence who pairs with whom. I use Wave I (2009) of the nationally representative How Couples Meet and Stay Together survey (Rosenfeld et al. 2013) to identify the types of people who meet through family, whether men or women play a more salient role in couple formation and whether couples who meet through family are less likely to be interracial, interreligious, or same-sex.
    [Show full text]
  • Marital Dissolution Among Interracial Couples
    YUANTING ZHANG Food and Drug Administration JENNIFER VAN HOOK Pennsylvania State University* Marital Dissolution Among Interracial Couples Increases in interracial marriage have been in- dramatically from less than 1% in 1970 among terpreted as reflecting reduced social distance all married couples to more than 5% in 2000. among racial and ethnic groups, but little is Children living in such families have quadrupled known about the stability of interracial mar- to more than 3 million between 1970 and 2000 riages. Using six panels of Survey of Income (Lee & Edmonston, 2005). Such changes have and Program Participation (N ¼ 23,139 mar- been interpreted as signifying the fading of racial ried couples), we found that interracial mar- boundaries in U.S. society (Qian & Lichter, riages are less stable than endogamous 2007) and as indicating immigrant structural marriages, but these findings did not hold up assimilation (Alba & Golden, 1986; Gordon, consistently. After controlling for couple char- 1964). acteristics, the risk of divorce or separation Enthusiasm about increases in the prevalence among interracial couples was similar to the of interracial marriages, however, may be damp- more-divorce-prone origin group. Although ened if such marriages are highly likely to break marital dissolution was found to be strongly up. Partially because interracial marriage remains associated with race or ethnicity, the results a relatively new phenomenon, few studies have failed to provide evidence that interracial mar- assessed the stability of interracial marriages or riage per se is associated with an elevated risk offered theoretical guidance on this issue. Exist- of marital dissolution. ing work tends to be dated and focused primarily on Black-White marriages.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Marries Whom in Pakistan? Role of Education in Marriage Timing and Spouse Selection
    Who Marries Whom in Pakistan? Role of Education in Marriage Timing and Spouse Selection Abstract Marriage markets in Pakistan have been undergoing changes in the recent decades, with age at first marriage, for both men and women, increasing steadily, especially for the more educated ones. Increasing women education, in absolute terms and in relation to men, is providing an opportunity for educational homogamy compared to in the past. At the same time, the tradition of hypergamous marriage arrangements for women is creating a “success penalty” for those who are more educated. Absolute level of educational homogamy is rising but no definitive word can be given on whether the function of education in spouse selection is strengthening or weakening in Pakistan. Marriage markets in the country are in a transitory state, showing increasing trends of educational homogamy on one hand, and on the other, we find a rising trend of familial endogamy and living in polygynous relationships for the more educated women. Keywords: Age at marriage, Educational homogamy, Hypergamy, Marriage squeeze, Endogamy, Polygyny. Extended Abstract Patterns of who marries whom have important implications for social stratification, family formation, the degree of inequality among families and individuals prevalent in a society, and the intergenerational mobility and transmission of social and genetic traits. Educational assortative marriages have interested social scientists because of the role that education plays in socio- economic inequality and its persistence from one generation to the other. Education does not only have a role in the selection of spouse but also the timing of the union, with more educated men and women likely to marry later than their less educated counterparts.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Tradition: Exogamy Marriage in Tenganan Village, Bali
    Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana ISSN: 1315-5216 ISSN: 2477-9555 [email protected] Universidad del Zulia Venezuela Breaking the Tradition: Exogamy Marriage in Tenganan village, Bali Sudarma, I Putu Breaking the Tradition: Exogamy Marriage in Tenganan village, Bali Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, vol. 25, núm. Esp.1, 2020 Universidad del Zulia, Venezuela Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=27963086020 DOI: https://doi.org/:10.5281/zenodo.3774613 PDF generado a partir de XML-JATS4R por Redalyc Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 2020, vol. 25, núm. Esp.1, Enero-Abril, ISSN: 1315-5216 2477-9555 Artículos Breaking the Tradition: Exogamy Marriage in Tenganan village, Bali Rompiendo la tradición: Matrimonio exógamo en la villa Tenganan, Bali I Putu Sudarma DOI: https://doi.org/:10.5281/zenodo.3774613 Hindu University, India Redalyc: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa? [email protected] id=27963086020 Recepción: 29 Febrero 2020 Aprobación: 18 Abril 2020 Resumen: En Tenganan Pegringsingan el matrimonio está muy cerrado porque los ciudadanos solo pueden casarse bajo endogamia. En contraste, el matrimonio exógamo está estrictamente prohibido. Cuando se viola esta prohibición, la novia y el novio están sujetos a sanciones adat. Las razones para aplicar la sanción adat al matrimonio de exogamia son: preservar la tradición, mantener el sistema de parentesco y el equilibrio. Los tipos de sanción adat son: bajo fianza y morales. Las implicaciones de las sanciones adat incluyen la no insurgencia, la falta de bienestar y la pérdida de los derechos. Palabras clave: Exogamia, matrimonio, sanciones adat, Tenganan, Bali.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Inheritance, Inmarriage, and the Status of Women
    Keeping It in the Family: Female Inheritance, Inmarriage, and the Status of Women Duman Bahrami-Rad∗ October 15, 2019 Abstract While female property ownership is associated with positive outcomes for women, their right to inherit property in male-dominated societies may also result in more constraining marriage and gen- der norms. I develop and test the following hypothesis: Where a woman inherits property, her male relatives are more likely to arrange her marriage within the same community in order to avoid frag- mentation of the land. Arranging the marriage also requires controlling the woman’s relations and mobility, which negatively impacts her economic participation. By analyzing datasets on pre-industrial societies and Indonesian individuals, I find that female inheritance is associated with a higher preva- lence of cousin and arranged marriages as well as lower female economic participation and premarital sexual freedom. Using a difference-in-differences design that exploits exogenous variation induced by a reform of inheritance laws in India, I also provide evidence for a causal effect of female inheritance on cousin marriage and female economic participation rates. These findings have implications for the evolution of marriage and gender norms in Islamic societies, where female inheritance is mandated by Islamic law. JEL classifications: D01, J12, J16, N30, Z12, Z13 Keywords: female inheritance, culture, gender inequality, marriage, female economic participation ∗Harvard University, Department of Human Evolutionary Biology. Email:
    [Show full text]