DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Declaration of the Fundamental Principles for the New Egyptian State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Declaration of the Fundamental Principles for the New Egyptian State Draft Declaration of the Fundamental Principles for the New Egyptian State We take pride in our ancient historical struggle for freedom, justice, equality, national sovereignty and peace. We are inspired by what we have presented to human civilization given the challenges that we faced while building a state of law and its new democratic and civil elements. We are convinced that the people are the source of legitimacy, that its will should never be circumvented through the establishment of irrevocable supra-constitutional principles, that there is no need to issue a constitutional declaration on supra-constitutional principles or other such principles, as the people’s will is sufficient. We seek to guarantee the satisfaction of the objectives of the 25 January 2011 Egyptian revolution in freedom, human dignity, and social justice. We are inspired by the revolution’s spirit, which all Egyptians are united by, and we respect the spirit of the martyrs and the sacrifices of our great people in its successive revolutions. We therefore declare the Fundamental Principles of the New Egyptian State, which are as follows: First: The Fundamental Principles (1) The Arab Republic of Egypt is a democratic civil state which is based on citizenship and on the rule of law. It respects pluralism and guarantees freedom, justice equality and equal opportunity to all citizens without exception. The Egyptian people are a part of the Arab people, and will work to secure their full unity. (2) Islam is the religion of state, and the Arab language is the official language of state. Islamic jurisprudence (shari3a) is the principle source of legislation. For non-muslims, personal status and other religious matters are to be determined according to their own rules. (3) Sovereignty belongs to the people only, who are the source of all power. The people exercise sovereignty through referendums and fair elections, which are to be held under judicial supervision and in accordance with an electoral law that guarantees a just representation for the people without exception or exclusion. (4) The state’s political system is to be republican and democratic and is to be based on a balance between the powers of the state, on the peaceful transfer of power, and on a multi-party system on the condition that such parties are not based on religion, race, a specific religious denomination, class or on any type of principle that does not conform with the fundamental freedoms that are set out in this declaration. (5) The rule of law is the state’s basis of government. All state authorities, public and private legal bodies, and all citizens are subject to all of its laws without distinction. Judicial independence is an essential guarantee that the state and its institutions will be subject to the law and that all citizens will achieve justice. 1 Draft Declaration of the Fundamental Principles for the New Egyptian State 1 November 2011 The higher judicial councils will be responsible for considering all judicial matters. Their approval must be sought for all bills that relate to its work before they come into effect. (6) The national economy is based on overall and sustainable development which must have as its objective social wellbeing, the satisfaction of citizens’ essential needs, to encourage investment, to protect free competition, to prevent harmful monopolies, to protect consumers and to ensure the just distribution of the benefits of development to citizens. The state is committed to protect public ownership of national facilities and other resources as well as natural resources, lands, and its national heritage, whether material or moral. (7) The Nile is a lifeline for Egypt. The state is committed to improve its administration and its protection from pollution and other violations, to maximize its use and to protect Egypt’s historical rights to the Nile. (8) Egypt is part of the African continent. It works in favor of its renaissance and in favor of cooperation between its peoples and the integration of its interests. Egypt is part of the Islamic world; it defends its causes and it works in favor of the joint interests of its peoples. Egypt is proud of the role that it has played from the beginning in human civilization and its positive contribution to promoting world peace and the principles of justice, human rights and increased cooperation between nations and peoples. (9) The state alone shall establish armed forces, which are the property of the people, and which have as their mission to protect the country, the integrity, security and unity of its land, and to defend constitutional legitimacy. It is not permissible for any body, organisation or party to form military or paramilitary bodies. The Supreme Council for the Armed Forces is solely responsible for all matters concerning the armed forces, and for discussing its budget, which should be incorporated as a single figure in the annual state budget. The Supreme Council for the Armed Forces is also exclusively competent to approve all bills relating to the armed forces before they come into effect. The President of the Republic is the highest authority of the armed forces and the minister of defense is the general authority of the armed forces. The President of the Republic declares war after the approval of the Supreme Council for the Armed Forces and of the People’s Assembly has been obtained. (10) A “national defence council” is established and is presided over by the President of the Republic. It is responsible for examining all matters relating to the country’s security and safety. Its other responsibilities will be determined by law. The defense of the nation and its territory is a sacred obligation. The military draft is obligatory in accordance with the law. General mobilization is also organized in accordance with the law. 2 Draft Declaration of the Fundamental Principles for the New Egyptian State 1 November 2011 Second: General rights and freedoms (11) Human dignity is an inherent right for all persons, and all Egyptian civilians are free and equal before the law and in terms of their general rights, their freedoms and their obligations. It is not permissible to discriminate against Egyptian civilians on the basis of sex, origin, language, religion, belief, wealth, social status, political belief, on the basis of a disability, etc. It is permissible to discriminate positively in favor of groups that are in need of protection. (12) The state guarantees freedom of belief, ensures freedom of worship and religious rites and protects places of worship. (13) Egyptian nationality is an inherent right for all citizens, and it is not permissible to revoke nationality or to expel any citizen from the country or to prevent him from returning to it without a reasoned court order. (14) Freedom of opinion and expression and the freedom of the press and other forms of media are guaranteed. Private life, the rights of others and of the various components that make up Egyptian society are inviolable. It is not permissible to censor the media or to monitor its sources without a reasoned court order that is limited in time. (15) All people have the right to knowledge, to the exchange of information, to its publication, to participate in cultural and artistic life in its various forms and in all its activities. The state guarantees academic freedom, the freedom to carry out scientific research and the freedom to engage in creativity and innovation. The state guarantees the independence of universities and of scientific research centers. (16) All people have the right to enjoy the sanctity of their private lives, including their communications, their telephonic, electronic conversations as well as all other forms of communications. It is prohibited to violate, restrict or confiscate such sanctity without a reasoned court decision that is limited in time. (17) All citizens have the freedom of residence and of movement. No citizen can be arrested, searched, detained or imprisoned or to restrict his personal freedom without a prior court decision. There can be no crime or punishment except by law. The accused is innocent until his guilt is established in a just judicial process before a judge. (18) Private property is protected. It cannot be interfered with in the absence of a court order and without just compensation. Private and public property, as well as cooperatives, contribute to the national economic development. (19) The right to work is guaranteed. The state works to provide the opportunity to work to all citizens in just conditions and without discrimination. The state is committed to providing a minimum wage that guarantees to citizens a decent and dignified standard of living. All citizens are guaranteed the right to hold public office, assuming they meet whatever conditions must be satisfied. 3 Draft Declaration of the Fundamental Principles for the New Egyptian State 1 November 2011 (20) All citizens have the right to life safely, to a clean environment free from pollution, to adequate nutrition, to housing, to health care and to carry out exercise. All citizens have the right to insurance against unemployment, disease, disability and old age in accordance with the requirements of justice and social solidarity. (21) Every citizen has the right to education. The State is committed to providing free educational opportunities in its educational institutions, and works to ensure that such educational opportunities are of a good quality in order to maximize the investment in human capital. Basic education is compulsory. The State oversees all state and private educational institutions. It ensures that the sense of belonging, national identity and culture are guaranteed. (22) Citizens have the right to form trade unions and federations, associations and NGOs. They have the right to peaceful assembly and demonstration, without prejudice to the rights of others or to the fundamental principles and rights that are set out in this Declaration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women's Struggle for Citizenship
    OCTOBER 2017 Women’s Struggle for Citizenship: Civil Society and Constitution Making after the Arab Uprisings JOSÉ S. VERICAT Cover Photo: Marchers on International ABOUT THE AUTHORS Women’s Day, Cairo, Egypt, March 8, 2011. Al Jazeera English. JOSÉ S. VERICAT is an Adviser at the International Peace Institute. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper represent those of the author Email: [email protected] and not necessarily those of the International Peace Institute. IPI welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit of ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS a well-informed debate on critical policies and issues in international The author would like to thank Mohamed Elagati and affairs. Nidhal Mekki for their useful feedback. This project would not have seen the light of day without the input of dozens IPI Publications of civil society activists from Egypt, Tunisia, and Yemen, as Adam Lupel, Vice President well as several from Libya and Syria, who believed in its Albert Trithart, Associate Editor value and selflessly invested their time and energy into it. Madeline Brennan, Assistant Production Editor To them IPI is very grateful. Within IPI, Amal al-Ashtal and Waleed al-Hariri provided vital support at different stages Suggested Citation: of the project’s execution. José S. Vericat, “Women’s Struggle for Citizenship: Civil Society and IPI owes a debt of gratitude to its many donors for their Constitution Making after the Arab generous support. In particular, IPI would like to thank the Uprisings,” New York: International governments of Finland and Norway for making this Peace Institute, October 2017. publication possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition To: United Nations Working
    PETITION TO: UNITED NATIONS WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION Mr Mads Andenas (Norway) Mr José Guevara (Mexico) Ms Shaheen Ali (Pakistan) Mr Sètondji Adjovi (Benin) Mr Vladimir Tochilovsky (Ukraine) HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY COPY TO: UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF OPINION AND EXPRESSION, MR DAVID KAYE; UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHTS TO FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY AND OF ASSOCIATION, MR MAINA KIAI; UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS, MR MICHEL FORST. in the matter of Alaa Abd El Fattah (the “Petitioner”) v. Egypt _______________________________________ Petition for Relief Pursuant to Commission on Human Rights Resolutions 1997/50, 2000/36, 2003/31, and Human Rights Council Resolutions 6/4 and 15/1 Submitted by: Media Legal Defence Initiative Electronic Frontier Foundation The Grayston Centre 815 Eddy Street 28 Charles Square San Francisco CA 94109 London N1 6HT BASIS FOR REQUEST The Petitioner is a citizen of the Arab Republic of Egypt (“Egypt”), which acceded to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”) on 14 January 1982. 1 The Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt 2014 (the “Constitution”) states that Egypt shall be bound by the international human rights agreements, covenants and conventions it has ratified, which shall have the force of law after publication in accordance with the conditions set out in the Constitution. 2 Egypt is also bound by those principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”) that have acquired the status of customary international law.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing with Fire. the Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian
    Playing with Fire.The Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian Leviathan Daniela Pioppi After the fall of Mubarak, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) decided to act as a stabilising force, to abandon the street and to lend democratic legiti- macy to the political process designed by the army. The outcome of this strategy was that the MB was first ‘burned’ politically and then harshly repressed after having exhausted its stabilising role. The main mistakes the Brothers made were, first, to turn their back on several opportunities to spearhead the revolt by leading popular forces and, second, to keep their strategy for change gradualist and conservative, seeking compromises with parts of the former regime even though the turmoil and expectations in the country required a much bolder strategy. Keywords: Egypt, Muslim Brotherhood, Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, Arab Spring This article aims to analyse and evaluate the post-Mubarak politics of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in an attempt to explain its swift political parable from the heights of power to one of the worst waves of repression in the movement’s history. In order to do so, the analysis will start with the period before the ‘25th of January Revolution’. This is because current events cannot be correctly under- stood without moving beyond formal politics to the structural evolution of the Egyptian system of power before and after the 2011 uprising. In the second and third parts of this article, Egypt’s still unfinished ‘post-revolutionary’ political tran- sition is then examined. It is divided into two parts: 1) the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF)-led phase from February 2011 up to the presidential elections in summer 2012; and 2) the MB-led phase that ended with the military takeover in July 2013 and the ensuing violent crackdown on the Brotherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Prominent Violations of Press and Media Freedom in Egypt During 2017
    Annual Report on: Freedom of Press and Media in Egypt 2017 Annual on: Freedom of PRreses apndo Merdtia in Egypt 2017 Conducted by Ahmed Abo Elmagd Reviewed by Ahmed Ragab Cover designed by Ahmed Sobhy Published year 2017 Annual Report on: Freedom of Press and Media in Egypt 2017 The Egyptian Center for Public Policy Studies (ECPPS) is a non-governmental, non- party and non-profit organization .It is mission is to propose public policies that aim at reforming the Egyptian legal and economic systems. ECPPS’s goal is to enhance the principles of free market, individual freedom and the rule of law. The Egyptian Center for Public Policy Studies (ECPPS) 1 Annual Report on: Freedom of Press and Media in Egypt 2017 In 2017, the Egyptian Center for Public Policies Studies issues a monthly monitoring to measure (Legislative climate, political climate, economic climate, media performance and civil society role) in regard to freedom of media and journalism in Egypt, in trying to stand on events, changes, violations which happen and effect on media and journalism statement in Egypt. The Egyptian Center for Public Policies Studies held general interviews and conferences with the participation of many parties and different entities (members of Parliament, members of Press Syndicate, researchers and members of media and journalism councils) just to review, present important events and actors observed over the year. This report includes an “annual detailed report for the statement of media and journalism in Egypt in 2017”. Important events and changes which affected negatively or positively in the climate of freedom of press and media work in Egypt in 2017 in addition to precise recommendations for decision makers based on these events and changes to improve the climate of media and journalism in Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    MEASURES BY THE EGYPTIAN GOVERNMENT TO COUNTER THE EXPLOITATION OF (SOCIAL) MEDIA - FACEBOOK AND AL JAZEERA Master Thesis Name: Rajko Smaak Student number: S1441582 Study: Master Crisis and Security Management Date: January 13, 2016 The Hague, The Netherlands Master Thesis: Measures by the Egyptian government to counter the exploitation of (social) media II Leiden University CAPSTONE PROJECT ‘FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION VERSUS FREEDOM FROM INTIMIDATION MEASURES BY THE EGYPTIAN GOVERNMENT TO COUNTER THE EXPLOITATION OF (SOCIAL) MEDIA - FACEBOOK AND AL JAZEERA BY Rajko Smaak S1441582 MASTER THESIS Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Crisis and Security Management at Leiden University, The Hague Campus. January 13, 2016 Leiden, The Netherlands Adviser: Prof. em. Alex P. Schmid Second reader: Dhr. Prof. dr. Edwin Bakker Master Thesis: Measures by the Egyptian government to counter the exploitation of (social) media III Leiden University Master Thesis: Measures by the Egyptian government to counter the exploitation of (social) media IV Leiden University Abstract During the Arab uprisings in 2011, social media played a key role in ousting various regimes in the Middle East and North Africa region. Particularly, social media channel Facebook and TV broadcast Al Jazeera played a major role in ousting Hosni Mubarak, former president of Egypt. Social media channels eases the ability for people to express, formulate, send and perceive messages on political issues. However, some countries demonstrate to react in various forms of direct and indirect control of these media outlets. Whether initiated through regulations or punitive and repressive measures such as imprisonment and censorship of media channels.
    [Show full text]
  • New Trends in Constitution-Making: the Cases of Tunisia and Egypt
    Department of Political Science Chair: Comparative Public Law New trends in Constitution-Making: the cases of Tunisia and Egypt Supervisor Professor Cristina Fasone Candidate Kristina Gumroian Student Reg.N.632772 Co- Supervisor Professor Francesca Maria Corrao Academic Year: 2017/2018 Table of contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 2 Constitutions as drivers for the democratic development of societies ..................... 9 2.1 Constitutional waves in modern states ............................................................. 10 2.2 Basic constitutional models ............................................................................. 15 2.3 Constituent power and the legitimacy of constitution-making ........................ 21 2.3.1 Introduction into the concept of constituent power .................................. 21 2.3.2 Constituent power in the Constitutional thought ...................................... 24 2.4 Transitional Constitutionalism ......................................................................... 26 2.4.1 Transition and the Constitutional moment ............................................... 26 2.4.2 The Backward- and the Forward-Looking Constitution........................... 28 2.5 Introduction into Constitutionalism in Islamic World ..................................... 30 3 The Arab Spring in the context of the Arab World ................................................ 41 3.1 A historical overview of the
    [Show full text]
  • Carter Center Mission to Witness the 2011–2012 Parliamentary Elections in Egypt
    Final Report of the Carter Center Mission to Witness the 2011–2012 Parliamentary Elections in Egypt Final Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. The Carter Center strives to relieve suffering by advancing peace and health worldwide; it seeks to prevent and resolve conflicts, enhance freedom and democracy, and protect and promote human rights worldwide. Final Report of the Carter Center Mission to Witness the 2011–2012 Parliamentary Elections in Egypt Final Report One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5188 Fax (404) 420-5196 www.cartercenter.org The Carter Center Contents Executive Summary .........................2 Media Environment ........................52 Quick Facts About the 2011–2012 Parliamentary Civil Society ..............................54 Elections in Egypt...........................5 The Role of CSOs in Witnessing the Elections ...54 Historical and Political Background ............6 The Role of CSOs in Providing Voter The Uprising .........................6 Education and Information ..................57 Aftermath: An Unstable Transition ............8 The Role of CSOs as Advocates ..............57 The March 2011 Constitutional Referendum .....9 Electoral Dispute Resolution.................58 Mismanagement and New Political Forces ......10 Consolidating and Clarifying the Electoral Complaints Process ................58 The Carter Center in Egypt .................12 Untimely Disruption of the Electoral Observation Methodology ................13 Process Through the Courts .................59
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Egypt RIGHTS State of Permanent Emergency Incompatible with Free and Fair Vote WATCH
    Egypt HUMAN Elections in Egypt RIGHTS State of Permanent Emergency Incompatible with Free and Fair Vote WATCH Elections in Egypt State of Permanent Emergency Incompatible with Free and Fair Copyright © 2010 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-721-3 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org December 2010 ISBN: 1-56432-721-3 Elections in Egypt State of Permanent Emergency Incompatible with Free and Fair Vote Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 I. Elections in a State of Emergency ............................................................................................. 4 Disruption of Demonstrations................................................................................................ 4 Media Crackdown ................................................................................................................. 5 Arrests of Campaign Activists ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian and Tunisian Media Development and Political Toleration Through Arab Spring
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2020 All the News Fit to Print: Egyptian and Tunisian Media Development and Political Toleration through Arab Spring Seth Fiderer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the International Relations Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, Models and Methods Commons, and the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons Recommended Citation Fiderer, Seth, "All the News Fit to Print: Egyptian and Tunisian Media Development and Political Toleration through Arab Spring" (2020). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1539. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1539 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. All the News Fit to Print: Egyptian and Tunisian Media Development and Political Toleration through Arab Spring A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in International Relations from The College of William and Mary by Seth Patrick Fiderer Accepted for ________Honors___________________________ __ ______________________________________ Professor Maurits van der Veen, Director Professor Sharan Grewal Professor Paul Vierthaler Williamsburg, VA May 8, 2020 Fiderer 1 1. Introduction The Arab Spring Revolutions of 2011 have had diverse outcomes throughout the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Two states that have experienced large scale change are Tunisia and Egypt, both of which experienced regime change. Tunisia has experienced large-scale democratization and has become more politically open.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt Malek Online Version Ed
    v COUNTRY REPORT 2021/16 REPORT ON JULY 2021 CITIZENSHIP LAW: EGYPT AUTHORED BY DALIA MALEK © Dalia Malek, 2021 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the year and the publisher. Requests should be addressed to [email protected]. Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual authors and not those of the European University Institute. Global Citizenship Observatory (GLOBALCIT) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Report on Citizenship Law: Egypt RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-CR 2021/16 July 2021 © Dalia Malek, 2021 Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, created in 1992 and currently directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes, projects and data sets, in addition to a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration, the expanding membership of the European Union, developments in Europe’s neighbourhood and the wider world.
    [Show full text]
  • From Revolutions to Constitutions: the Case of Egypt
    From revolutions to constitutions: the case of Egypt ANTHONY F. LANG, JR* Should a constitution be an ideal document guaranteeing international human rights or a compromise document that reflects the interests and powers of different actors in a societal context? For many in the West, the former seems to be their primary understanding of constitutionalism; they tend to forget that their polit- ical orders arose from something closer to the latter. In this article, I argue that the constitutions emerging from the recent revolutions in the Middle East should be interpreted in political rather than purely legal or rights-based terms. Using Egypt as the primary case-study, I propose that its new constitution should be seen as a compromise between conflicting political interests that has created insti- tutions within which claims for rights and responsibilities are still to be negoti- ated. Rather than an ideal document that will protect human rights, the Egyptian constitution should be seen as a political project in which interests and conflicts will be negotiated. While much of the coverage of the Arab Spring has focused on the emergence of new political actors, the role of Islam and the security context of the wider region, a focus on constitutions and constitution-making reveals important polit- ical interests, actors and outcomes. The significance of this constitution-making process has largely been overlooked, as regional experts have (for good reason) paid less attention to written constitutions in most Middle Eastern states, and constitutional and legal theorists have seemed more comfortable exploring consti- tutions in established democracies.1 This article will explore the dynamics of political change and constitution- making in one case, Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electoral Framework in Egypt's Continuing Transition: February 2011
    IFES Briefing Paper | October 2013 Elections in Egypt: The Electoral Framework in Egypt’s Continuing Transition: February 2011 – September 2013 Middle East and North Africa International Foundation for Electoral Systems 1850 K Street, NW | Fifth Floor | Washington, D.C. 20006 | www.IFES.org October 11, 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Changes to the Electoral Framework, 2011-2012 ................................................................................ 2 March 2011 Constitutional Declaration .................................................................................................... 2 The Law on the People’s Assembly ........................................................................................................... 3 The Law on the Regulation of the Exercise of Political Rights .................................................................. 4 Elections in 2011 and 2012 ....................................................................................................................... 5 Dissolution of the People’s Assembly ....................................................................................................... 7 Constituent Assembly ............................................................................................................................... 7 3. The Electoral Framework in the 2012 Constitution .............................................................................
    [Show full text]