Managing Stability in the Taiwan Strait: Non-Military Policy Towards Taiwan Under Hu Jintao, In: Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 38, 3, 99-118

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Managing Stability in the Taiwan Strait: Non-Military Policy Towards Taiwan Under Hu Jintao, In: Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 38, 3, 99-118 Journal of Current Chinese Affairs China aktuell Chang, Wu-ueh and Chien-min Chao (2009), Managing Stability in the Taiwan Strait: Non-Military Policy towards Taiwan under Hu Jintao, in: Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 38, 3, 99-118. ISSN: 1868-4874 (online), ISSN: 1868-1026 (print) The online version of this and the other articles can be found at: <www.CurrentChineseAffairs.org> Published by GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Institute of Asian Studies in cooperation with the National Institute of Chinese Studies, White Rose East Asia Centre at the Universities of Leeds and Sheffield and Hamburg University Press. The Journal of Current Chinese Affairs is an Open Access publication. It may be read, copied and distributed free of charge according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. To subscribe to the print edition: <[email protected]> For an e-mail alert please register at: <www.CurrentChineseAffairs.org> The Journal of Current Chinese Affairs is part of the GIGA Journal Family which includes: Africa Spectrum • Journal of Current Chinese Affairs • Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs • Journal of Politics in Latin America • <www.giga-journal-family.org> Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 3/2009: 99-118 Managing Stability in the Taiwan Strait: Non-Military Policy towards Taiwan under Hu Jintao Wu-ueh Chang and Chien-min Chao Abstract: China’s Taiwan policy has been one of coupling intimidation (the “stick” approach) with coercion (the “carrot” approach), a policy mix which, in the near term, is not likely to change, as is evidenced by the passage of the “Anti-Secession Law” in March, 2005. However, un- der Hu Jintao, the focus has been on pragmatism. The warm atmosphere that presently reigns in the Taiwan Strait area is unprecedented. Further talks are expected before the two cross-Strait leaders are slated to step down, simultaneously, in 2012. An era of reconciliation and negotiations has dawned. For the first time there is consensus regarding norms of interaction between the two sides. Cross-Strait relations have stabilized after years of tumult. More open, stable and predictable cross-Strait rela- tions are in the interests of both sides. Difficulties surely lie ahead, but they will be dealt with in a different manner than what has been wit- nessed in the past. Manuscript received May 15, 2009; accepted July 25, 2009 Keywords: Taiwan, Hu Jintao, cross-Strait relations, Leading Small Group, ARATS. Dr. Wu-ueh Chang is currently director and associate professor at the Institute of Mainland China Studies, Tamkang University, Taiwan. He received his Ph.D. from the Institute of East Asian Studies, National Chengchi University. E-mail: <[email protected]> Dr. Chien-min Chao is currently a distinguished professor at Sun Yat- sen Graduate Institute for Development Studies, National Chengchi University. He has been a visiting distinguished professor at George Washington University and visiting teaching professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. E-mail: <[email protected]> 100 Wu-ueh Chang and Chien-min Chao Introduction On April 29, 2005, a historic meeting took place between Hu Jintao, the General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, and Kuomintang (KMT) chairman Dr. Lien Chan at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse. Al- though the previous year, the KMT had been deposed as the ruling party and Lien lost the election, the meeting was significant in that it was the first between leaders of the former arch-enemies in more than six dec- ades. The “Common Aspiration and Prospects for Cross-Strait Peace and Development” produced as a result of that meeting heralded a new policy line that now constitutes the core of the current mainland-China policy formulated by President Ma Ying-jeou who reclaimed the regime for the KMT in March, 2008, after an eight-year hiatus, during which the independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ruled. Two months after the power transition, Hu met with Taiwan’s new ruling party chairman Wu Poh-hsiung. Their eventful meeting was followed, in mid-June, by a resumption of talks between the two semi-official organi- zations, the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS). These events established Hu’s reputation as the Chinese leader who successfully brought cross- Strait relations back from the brink of disaster and spurred the normali- zation process. These are no small steps and what Hu faces is an entirely new ball game. The international scene, cross-Strait interactions, and domestic concerns on both sides of the Strait, have changed drastically in the past decade. China’s rise and war in the Middle East have given Beijing a signifi- cantly stronger voice in international affairs, especially in East Asia. Tai- wan’s pursuit of a more autonomous status under the previous Chen Shui-bian administration placed China in a very precarious situation and Chen’s quest for a new constitution and a referendum seeking approval to officially use the name “Taiwan” upon entry to the United Nations, led Beijing to declare that the island republic was, in effect, seeking de jure independence (Chao 2005). The perception that the Taiwan Strait was in a state of emergency prompted Jiang Zemin’s enactment of a more assertive policy – known as wengong wuhe (“to attack with pens and intimidate with coercion”; a parallel to Theodore Roosevelt’s “Walk softly and carry a big stick”). Cross-Strait relations at the beginning of the new millennium became more tenuous than at any other time since the early 1980s when China began to de-radicalize its policies. When the Managing Stability in the Taiwan Strait 101 fifth-generation leadership, headed by Hu Jintao, took power in 2002, the challenge in the Taiwan Strait region was so daunting that the area was considered, by some, to be on “the brink of war”. The passage of the “Anti-Secession Law” in March 2005, cast a heavy shadow over the Taiwan Strait. However, in a dramatic about-face, Hu Jintao reduced the coercive (“stick”) part of the two-pronged policy and weighing in, in- stead, more heavily in favour of a “carrot” approach. With this new en- gagement policy in place, cross-Strait relations were poised for a change when Taiwan’s second power transition occurred in March 2008. Does, in fact, the “blue sky after a heavy rain” exist, as described by Chen Yunlin, head of the State Council’s Taiwan Affairs Office (SCTAO) until his reappointment as chairman of the ARATS (China’s window of communications with Taiwan) on the eve of the second talks (SCTAO website 2008b). What is the rationale behind Hu Jintao’s great change? Are cross-Strait relations set for a great leap forward? Ma Ying-jeou’s landslide victory – along with the defeat of the “Tai- wan for [the] UN” referendum – ushered in a new era in the, heretofore, difficult cross-Strait relations. With a president who publicly contests advocacy for independence and a ruling party, the KMT, that controls over three-quarters of the seats in the Legislative Yuan, it is safe to say that the worst period in relations is probably over. Engagement, rather than nationalistic confrontation, has become the very core of policy- thinking on both sides.1 The provocative “desinification” policy that was believed to be the pivotal part of Chen Shui-bian’s efforts to consolidate “Taiwan consciousness” is probably a thing of the past.2 Trust between the two sides is likely to be restored, gradually. The power shift in Tai- wan has also put a halt to the instability caused previously by the minor- ity DPP government, which had retained only 23.9% of the seats in the 1 What worries Beijing the most is that Taiwan might attempt to add the “state-to- state” theory, via amendment, to the constitution. This is what is meant by “de jure” independence. According to the ROC’s constitution, an amendment proposal must be passed, first, by three-quarters of the Legislative Yuan and it is, then, sub- ject to a popular referendum. During this second stage, half of all registered voters are required to vote, and the approbation of half of those voting is necessary for the process to be complete. With the KMT in power, there is little likelihood that any such amendment would succeed. 2 Many of the congratulatory dispatches from foreign dignitaries sent to Ma Ying- jeou following his election, including those from U.S. President George W. Bush and the Japanese and U.K.’s foreign anticipation of fresh opportunities for dialogue and peace in the Taiwan Strait area. 102 Wu-ueh Chang and Chien-min Chao 2008 Legislative Yuan election despite having garnered 39.1% of the popular vote. As Taiwanese politics stabilize so should relations between the two sides. This article argues that Hu Jintao is more pragmatic than any previ- ous Chinese leader in his handling of the thorny issue of cross-Strait relations. As a result, the two Taiwan Strait neighbours currently have more in common than at any other time in the past. China’s ultimate goal of national unification has been delayed and cross-Strait relations are now instrumental to the advancement of the PRC and ROC’s mutual economic interests. Policies – and the relevant organizations dealing with them – have been reshaped in order to accommodate this new reality. Storm Clouds before Hu Jintao: Jiang Zemin and the Wengong Wuhe Beijing’s Taiwan policy was changed in the context of the post-Mao era policy shift, injecting incentives into its enervated economic system. The new policy, promulgating “peaceful unification”, featured Deng’s “one country, two systems” formula, which allowed for an interim period leading to eventual unification.
Recommended publications
  • Uncovering the Messages Behind Four Imperial Dragon Robes from Exhibitions with Yin and Yang Message
    Journalism and Mass Communication, January 2017, Vol. 7, No. 1, 53-62 doi: 10.17265/2160-6579/2017.01.006 D DAVID PUBLISHING Uncovering the Messages Behind Four Imperial Dragon Robes from Exhibitions With Yin and Yang Message Shu Hwa Lin, C J Duarte University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu HI, USA The design themes of three Qing dynasty imperial dragon robes from the University of Hawaii at Manoa Costume Collection act as carriers of the Chinese yin-yang philosophy. The information shared by these imperial dragon robes are discussed through a cultural and technological analysis of the symbolic motifs and fabric structures of these garments to reveal the cultural and social impact of yin-yang on Qing imperial costume design. Keywords: Dragon robe, Yin and Yang, imperial/court costume Introduction Since the Qing dynasty (1644-1911), the yin-yang philosophy has been utilized in Chinese court dress (Lin, 2015). The influence of yin-yang on Chinese costume design can be observed in the surviving artifacts of the Qing dynasty (Cheng, 2008; Camman, 1952). The University of Hawaii at Manoa (UHM) Costume Collection (UHMCC) houses three kosse robes (i.e., tapestry) and one embroidery dragon robes from the Qing dynasty which provide representations of the yin-yang philosophy through the motifs and color patterns of its design. These important robes were selected to exhibit during special days such as year of dragon, UHM 100 years, and UHMCC 50 year’s anniversary. There are four categories of court dress: gunfu, chaofu, jifu, changfu (Zhoa, 1989; Zhou & Gao, 1988). Three dragon robes from the UHM Costume Collection are classified as jifu, or semi-formal court robe (Vollmer, 1977a).
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Contextualism in Chinese Philosophy Yuzhou Yang a Thesis
    Practical Contextualism in Chinese Philosophy Yuzhou Yang A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities and Languages Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences November 2016 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Yang First name: Yuzhou Other name/s: Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD School: School of Humanities and Languages Faculty: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Title: Practical Contextualism in Chinese Philosophy Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) 'Practical Contextualism' is a multifaceted concept which, I will argue, permeates various ancient Chinese texts. The central focus of practical contextualism is to be aware of, and sensitive to, the contextual environment or situation, including the relationships involved in those contexts. On an individual level, this has important implications for one’s daily engagement with others and the world. On a socio-political level, this is essential to creating and implementing well-functioning social and political institutions and policies. Practical contextualism means, among other things, that one must be prepared for possible changes that might occur in these contexts, and calls for the fostering of optimal and timely responses and solutions. In this light, the cultivation of the self is an arduous process whereby one develops epistemic cognition and skills in order to be able to detect and deal with exigent situations. This thesis studies four pre-Qin Chinese texts: the Yi Jing, the Han Fei Zi, the Zhuang Zi, and the Analects. Each of these arguably exemplifies the particular tradition or practical field it represents, and has received extensive and long-term scholarly attention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Web That Has No Weaver
    THE WEB THAT HAS NO WEAVER Understanding Chinese Medicine “The Web That Has No Weaver opens the great door of understanding to the profoundness of Chinese medicine.” —People’s Daily, Beijing, China “The Web That Has No Weaver with its manifold merits … is a successful introduction to Chinese medicine. We recommend it to our colleagues in China.” —Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China “Ted Kaptchuk’s book [has] something for practically everyone . Kaptchuk, himself an extraordinary combination of elements, is a thinker whose writing is more accessible than that of Joseph Needham or Manfred Porkert with no less scholarship. There is more here to think about, chew over, ponder or reflect upon than you are liable to find elsewhere. This may sound like a rave review: it is.” —Journal of Traditional Acupuncture “The Web That Has No Weaver is an encyclopedia of how to tell from the Eastern perspective ‘what is wrong.’” —Larry Dossey, author of Space, Time, and Medicine “Valuable as a compendium of traditional Chinese medical doctrine.” —Joseph Needham, author of Science and Civilization in China “The only approximation for authenticity is The Barefoot Doctor’s Manual, and this will take readers much further.” —The Kirkus Reviews “Kaptchuk has become a lyricist for the art of healing. And the more he tells us about traditional Chinese medicine, the more clearly we see the link between philosophy, art, and the physician’s craft.” —Houston Chronicle “Ted Kaptchuk’s book was inspirational in the development of my acupuncture practice and gave me a deep understanding of traditional Chinese medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan Independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Dalei Jie University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Jie, Dalei, "The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 524. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Abstract How to explain the rise and fall of the Taiwan independence policy? As the Taiwan Strait is still the only conceivable scenario where a major power war can break out and Taiwan's words and deeds can significantly affect the prospect of a cross-strait military conflict, ot answer this question is not just a scholarly inquiry. I define the aiwanT independence policy as internal political moves by the Taiwanese government to establish Taiwan as a separate and sovereign political entity on the world stage. Although two existing prevailing explanations--electoral politics and shifting identity--have some merits, they are inadequate to explain policy change over the past twenty years. Instead, I argue that there is strategic rationale for Taiwan to assert a separate sovereignty. Sovereignty assertions are attempts to substitute normative power--the international consensus on the sanctity of sovereignty--for a shortfall in military- economic-diplomatic assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional-Executive Commission on China Annual
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2007 ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 10, 2007 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov VerDate 11-MAY-2000 01:22 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 38026.TXT CHINA1 PsN: CHINA1 2007 ANNUAL REPORT VerDate 11-MAY-2000 01:22 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 38026.TXT CHINA1 PsN: CHINA1 CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2007 ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 10, 2007 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 38–026 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 01:22 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 38026.TXT CHINA1 PsN: CHINA1 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 01:22 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 38026.TXT CHINA1 PsN: CHINA1 CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate SANDER M. LEVIN, Michigan, Chairman BYRON DORGAN, North Dakota, Co-Chairman MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio MAX BAUCUS, Montana TOM UDALL, New Mexico CARL LEVIN, Michigan MICHAEL M. HONDA, California DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California TIM WALZ, Minnesota SHERROD BROWN, Ohio CHRISTOPHER H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Danger of Deconsolidation Roberto Stefan Foa and Yascha Mounk Ronald F
    July 2016, Volume 27, Number 3 $14.00 The Danger of Deconsolidation Roberto Stefan Foa and Yascha Mounk Ronald F. Inglehart The Struggle Over Term Limits in Africa Brett L. Carter Janette Yarwood Filip Reyntjens 25 Years After the USSR: What’s Gone Wrong? Henry E. Hale Suisheng Zhao on Xi Jinping’s Maoist Revival Bojan Bugari¡c & Tom Ginsburg on Postcommunist Courts Clive H. Church & Adrian Vatter on Switzerland Daniel O’Maley on the Internet of Things Delegative Democracy Revisited Santiago Anria Catherine Conaghan Frances Hagopian Lindsay Mayka Juan Pablo Luna Alberto Vergara and Aaron Watanabe Zhao.NEW saved by BK on 1/5/16; 6,145 words, including notes; TXT created from NEW by PJC, 3/18/16; MP edits to TXT by PJC, 4/5/16 (6,615 words). AAS saved by BK on 4/7/16; FIN created from AAS by PJC, 4/25/16 (6,608 words). PGS created by BK on 5/10/16. XI JINPING’S MAOIST REVIVAL Suisheng Zhao Suisheng Zhao is professor at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver. He is executive director of the univer- sity’s Center for China-U.S. Cooperation and editor of the Journal of Contemporary China. When Xi Jinping became paramount leader of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 2012, some Chinese intellectuals with liberal lean- ings allowed themselves to hope that he would promote the cause of political reform. The most optimistic among them even thought that he might seek to limit the monopoly on power long claimed by the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
    [Show full text]
  • China | Freedom House
    China | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/china A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 0 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 0 / 4 There are no direct or competitive elections for national executive leaders. The National People’s Congress (NPC) formally elects the state president for five-year terms and confirms the premier after he is nominated by the president, but both positions are decided in advance at the relevant CCP congress. The CCP’s seven- member Politburo Standing Committee (PSC), headed by Xi Jinping in his role as the party’s general secretary, sets government and party policy in practice. Xi also holds the position of state president and serves as chairman of the state and party military commissions. Xi was awarded a second five-year term as general secretary at the 19th Party Congress in October 2017, and at the NPC session in March 2018 he was confirmed for a second five-year term as state president. Also at that session, the NPC approved amendments to China’s constitution that abolished the two-term limit for the state presidency and vice presidency. Combined with the absence of another PSC member young enough to serve as Xi’s successor in 2022, the move reinforced predictions that he planned to break with precedent and remain China’s paramount leader for the foreseeable future. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 0 / 4 The 3,000 NPC members are formally elected for five-year terms by subnational congresses, but in practice all candidates are vetted by the CCP.
    [Show full text]
  • Contending Perspectives on Chinese Economic Reform and State Governance
    Journal of International and Global Studies Volume 5 Number 2 Article 7 4-1-2014 Rethinking China’s Model: Contending Perspectives on Chinese Economic Reform and State Governance Zhiguo Ye Seattle Pacific University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/jigs Part of the Anthropology Commons, Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Ye, Zhiguo (2014) "Rethinking China’s Model: Contending Perspectives on Chinese Economic Reform and State Governance," Journal of International and Global Studies: Vol. 5 : No. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/jigs/vol5/iss2/7 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of International and Global Studies by an authorized editor of Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rethinking China’s Model: Contending Perspectives on Chinese Economic Reform and State Governance Review Essay by Zhiguo Ye, History Department, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA, [email protected] Wang Mengkui ed. Thirty Years of China's Reform. London and New York: Routledge. 2012. Joseph Tse-Hei Lee, Lida V Nedilsky, Siu Keung Cheung (eds.) China's Rise to Power: Conceptions of State Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2012. China has made impressive economic achievements over the course of its last thirty years of reform. As the country becomes the world’s second largest economy and actively seeks a peaceful rise as a global power, the discussion of the so-called “China model” (zhongguo moshi) or China developmental model (zhongguo fazhan moshi) attracts scholars from both within and outside China.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Politics of Taiwan's February 28
    The History and Politics of Taiwan’s February 28 Incident, 1947- 2008 by Yen-Kuang Kuo BA, National Taiwan Univeristy, Taiwan, 1991 BA, University of Victoria, 2007 MA, University of Victoria, 2009 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of History © Yen-Kuang Kuo, 2020 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee The History and Politics of Taiwan’s February 28 Incident, 1947- 2008 by Yen-Kuang Kuo BA, National Taiwan Univeristy, Taiwan, 1991 BA, University of Victoria, 2007 MA, University of Victoria, 2009 Supervisory Committee Dr. Zhongping Chen, Supervisor Department of History Dr. Gregory Blue, Departmental Member Department of History Dr. John Price, Departmental Member Department of History Dr. Andrew Marton, Outside Member Department of Pacific and Asian Studies iii Abstract Taiwan’s February 28 Incident happened in 1947 as a set of popular protests against the postwar policies of the Nationalist Party, and it then sparked militant actions and political struggles of Taiwanese but ended with military suppression and political persecution by the Nanjing government. The Nationalist Party first defined the Incident as a rebellion by pro-Japanese forces and communist saboteurs. As the enemy of the Nationalist Party in China’s Civil War (1946-1949), the Chinese Communist Party initially interpreted the Incident as a Taiwanese fight for political autonomy in the party’s wartime propaganda, and then reinterpreted the event as an anti-Nationalist uprising under its own leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of Chinese Capitalism: the Worker, the Factory, and the Future of the World
    Zakir AVSAR 1 1 Haci Bayram Veli University, 06570 Ankara, Turkey; e-mail: [email protected] EURASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL, Eurasian ERJ, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 87-89, July 2020 Research Journal July 2020 ISSN 2519-2442, KAZAKHSTAN Vol. 2, No. 2 Book Review THE MYTH OF CHINESE CAPITALISM: THE WORKER, THE FACTORY, AND THE FUTURE OF THE WORLD Fatih MANGIR 1 1 Selcuk University, 42700 Konya, Turkey; e-mail: [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0003-1348-7818 Dexter Tiff Roberts.The Myth of Chinese Capitalism: the Worker, the Factory, and the Future of the World. St. Martin’s Press, 2020. pp. 288. BOOK REVIEWS After receiving his bachelor of science from Stanford University and master degree of international relations from Columbia University, Dexter Tiff Roberts is now serving as a fellow at the University of Montana’s Maureen and Mike Mansfield Center. He worked several years as a journalist and a public speaker with several journalist awards including Overseas Press Club awards, the Sid- ney Hillman Foundation prize, Human Rights Press awards, and Society of Pub- lishers in Asia. Earlier in his career, he worked as an author and editor-in-chief for the Bloomberg Businessweek. “The Myth of Chinese Capitalism: The Worker, the Factory, and the Future of the World” was Roberts’ first book published by St. Martin’s Press in March 2020. The author explains the motivations behind the China’s industrial and financial revolution by giving evidences from the people, not numbers. The book starts with the rise of China by the paramount leader of the People’s Republic of China, Deng Xiaoping, the man who ended the Mao-era communes and opened economy into foreign investors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of US-China Relations Richard Bush, Brookings Institution Shelley Rigger, Davidson Colleg
    The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of US-China Relations Richard Bush, Brookings Institution Shelley Rigger, Davidson College The Taiwan Issue in US-China Normalization After 1949, there were many obstacles to normalization of relations between the United States and the new People’s Republic of China (PRC), but Taiwan was no doubt a key obstacle. The Kuomintang-led Republic of China (ROC) government and armies had retreated there. Washington maintained diplomatic relations with the ROC government and, in 1954-55, acceded to Chiang Kai-shek’s entreaties for a mutual defense treaty. After June 1950 with the outbreak of the Korean conflict, the United States took the position that the status of the island of Taiwan— whether it was part of the sovereign territory of China—was “yet to be determined.” More broadly, PRC leaders regarded the United States as a threat to their regime, particularly because of its support for the ROC, and American leaders viewed China as a threat to peace and stability in East Asia and to Taiwan, which they saw as an ally in the containment of Asian communism in general and China in particular. It was from Taiwan’s Ching Chuan Kang (CCK) airbase, for example, that U.S. B-52s flew bombing missions over North Vietnam. By the late 1960s, PRC and U.S. leaders recognized the strategic situation in Asia had changed, and that the geopolitical interests of the two countries were not in fundamental conflict. Jimmy Carter and Deng Xiaoping not only reaffirmed that assessment but also recognized a basis for economic cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Contest for Power and Influence
    CHAPTER 1 U.S.-CHINA GLOBAL COMPETITION SECTION 1: A GLOBAL CONTEST FOR POWER AND INFLUENCE: CHINA’S VIEW OF STRA- TEGIC COMPETITION WITH THE UNITED STATES Key Findings • Beijing has long held the ambition to match the United States as the world’s most powerful and influential nation. Over the past 15 years, as its economic and technological prowess, dip- lomatic influence, and military capabilities have grown, China has turned its focus toward surpassing the United States. Chi- nese leaders have grown increasingly aggressive in their pur- suit of this goal following the 2008 global financial crisis and General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Xi Jinping’s ascent to power in 2012. • Chinese leaders regard the United States as China’s primary adversary and as the country most capable of preventing the CCP from achieving its goals. Over the nearly three decades of the post-Cold War era, Beijing has made concerted efforts to diminish the global strength and appeal of the United States. Chinese leaders have become increasingly active in seizing op- portunities to present the CCP’s one-party, authoritarian gover- nance system and values as an alternative model to U.S. global leadership. • China’s approach to competition with the United States is based on the CCP’s view of the United States as a dangerous ideologi- cal opponent that seeks to constrain its rise and undermine the legitimacy of its rule. In recent years, the CCP’s perception of the threat posed by Washington’s championing of liberal demo- cratic ideals has intensified as the Party has reemphasized the ideological basis for its rule.
    [Show full text]