DOCSLIB.ORG

Efficient Buffy Coat Extraction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Efficient Buffy Coat Extraction Application Note Efficient buffy coat extraction Reliable extraction of buffy coat from human blood on a Freedom EVO® platform Introduction The recent advances in personalized diagnostics continue to A valuable body fluid for diagnostic purposes is the buffy coat, inspire a wealth of personalized treatments, resulting in a layer of leukocytes and platelets that forms between the state-of-the-art personalized heathcare. The Integrated erythrocyte layer and the plasma when unclotted blood is Biobank of Luxembourg (IBBL), a newly founded independent, centrifuged or allowed to stand. Typically, the isolation of the not-for-profit biobank, designed for a new era of research and buffy coat from whole blood has been a tedious and lengthy the next generation of healthcare, is at the forefront of these manual process. Researchers at the Integrated Biobank of medical advances. Research into personalized medicine Luxembourg have tested and evaluated the feasibility and requires high quality samples (including tissue and body efficiency of extracting the buffy coat using an automated fluids, such as blood, blood fractions and saliva) and clinical process on Tecan’s Freedom EVO platform. data from large numbers of patients, collected by biobanks, to translate today’s discoveries into future personalized medical The automation of buffy coat extraction is challenging. In care innovations. As a world class EU biobank, the IBBL addition to the blood volumes in the individual blood collection provides a wide variety of the highest quality samples, tubes varying, important inter-individual variations in the alongside cutting-edge technology, to accelerate clinical quantity, viscosity and texture of the buffy coat layer itself, for research and improve public health. example due to leukocyte increase upon infection, can be observed. Tecan’s Freedom EVO platform, equipped with a Tube Inspection Unit (TIU), has been optimized for automated buffy coat extraction, giving superior results compared to the manual process. 1 Application Note Materials and Methods Plasma Instrument Tecan Freedom EVO 200 liquid handling workstation with an eight-channel Liquid Handling (LiHa) Arm, equipped with: Upper fraction limit Module Module description/benefit Buffy Coat Pipetted fraction Pick and Place Arm Moves tubes Separation layer (measured) (PnP) Lower fraction limit Tube Inspection Unit Identifies separation level (TIU) between serum and blood cells Red Blood Cells Robotic Manipulator Moves plates (RoMa) Arm Figure 2 Schematic diagram of fractionated blood. Xtr-96 flatbed scanner Tracks destination tubes (FluidX) Manual workflow Xsd-96Pro Decaps and recaps destination Manual buffy coat extraction was performed by slowly (FluidX) tubes aspirating 940 µl of buffy coat with a pipette in a circular Xsd-48Pro Decaps and recaps destination movement, trying not to disturb the red blood cell layer. FluidX) tubes BDK module HEPA filtered air on worktable Automated workflow The worktable layout is shown in Figure 1. The centrifuged decapped blood collection tubes were placed onto the Freedom EVO 200 platform and transferred to the Tube Inspection Unit, which identified the position of the buffy coat layer using a laser beam. The Liquid Handling Arm aspirated 940 µl of the buffy coat in a spiral movement (Figure 3), and transferred this fraction to the destination tube. The configuration and scripting of the Freedom EVO workstation were optimized to maximize the yield and quality of the buffy coat. Automated extraction of buffy coat from 24 samples Figure 1 Freedom EVO worktable, optimized for buffy coat (BC) extraction, with Tube Inspection Unit. takes just 16 minutes (Table 1). Sample preparation Automated process sample throughput K2-EDTA (BD) 10 ml blood collection tubes were centrifuged Sample numbers 1-24 samples at 2,000 g for 10 minutes at room temperature to separate the Batch time +/-16 mins for 24 samples Table 1 Overview of sample throughput for buffy coat extraction. blood into plasma, red blood cells and the intermediate thin, For larger batch sizes the time used increases proportionally. white colored layer, the buffy coat (Figure 2). 2 Application Note DNA yield After carefully optimizing the scripting for automated buffy coat extraction on the Freedom EVO, the efficiency of the extraction was confirmed by purifying DNA from the buffy coat. Buffy coat from 8 ml blood samples from approximately 100 donors was extracted using either the automated or the manual method and the DNA was purified. The automated extraction process demonstrated higher DNA yields compared to the manual extraction method (Table 3). 8 ml blood DNA yield (µg) Median 25 % 75 % n Figure 3 Automated pipetting of the buffy coat is performed in a spiral Manual BC 145.2 111.5 184.2 53 manner, with a defined movement from top to bottom. extraction Results Automated BC 199.1 181.6 239.3 49 extraction Table 3 Automated extraction of buffy coat gave a higher yield of DNA Verification of white blood cell populations compared to the manual process. To ensure that the buffy coat extracted using the automated process contains normal levels of white blood cell (WBC) Validation populations, flow cytometry analysis was performed on buffy To check the efficiency of buffy coat extraction, blood coat extracted from three different healthy donors (Table 2). collection tubes were inspected by eye after the withdrawal of Normal subpopulation percentages of WBCs were detected. equivalent volumes of buffy coat by the manual and automated extraction processes. The buffy coat withdrawal Population Automated Automated Automated appears more complete with the automated process percentages BC#1 BC#2 BC#3 (Figure 4). Lymphocytes 33.9 39.4 37.1 (% all cells) Monocytes 6.5 6.7 9.8 (% all cells) Granulocytes 59.6 53.9 53.1 (% all cells) CD3 T cells (% 66.7 72.9 67.1 lymphocytes) CD19 B cells 11.1 10.9 14.3 Manual BC extraction Automated BC extraction (% lymphocytes) Figure 4 Blood collection tubes after withdrawal of equivalent Table 2 White blood cells in buffy coats extracted using the automated volume of buffy coat by manual process (3 tubes on the left) process contain normal subpopulation percentages. Flow cytometry or automated process (3 tubes on the right). experiments were performed on a BD Influx™ cytometer using standard antibodies. 3 Application Note To check the efficiency of buffy coat extraction by a more process the numbers of white blood cells and platelets were quantitative approach, the blood cells in the buffy coat were higher, and red blood cell contamination and hemoglobin counted and compared to the cell numbers in whole blood levels were lower compared to manually extracted buffy coat. (Table 5). In the buffy coats extracted by the automated Whole blood Automated BC extraction Manual BC extraction Parameter measured Total cell number Total cell number Recovery (%) Total cell number Recovery (%) or quantity or quantity versus whole blood or quantity versus whole blood Mean Mean Mean WBC (106) 47.2 45.0 95 26.6 56 RBC (106) 36107 7405 21 9020 25 HGB (g) 1.088 0.225 21 0.271 25 PLT (106) 1931 172 69 676 35 Table 5 Blood cell counts for whole blood, and automated and manual extraction of buffy coat. WBC (white blood cells), RBC (red blood cells), HGB (hemoglobin), PLT (platelets). Conclusion Automation of buffy coat extraction on the Freedom EVO Talk to your local Tecan consultant to find out more about allows fast, convenient and reproducible extraction. customizing the Freedom EVO workstation to your • The DNA yield from the buffy coat extracted with the laboratories needs. automated method is higher compared to the manual method. For more information on the use of automation in biobanking, • Automation of buffy coat extraction permits the isolation visit www.tecan.com\biobanking of all leukocyte subpopulations. • Compared to manual buffy coat extraction, automation guarantees high sample throughput and reproducibility, eliminates operator variability, and automates sample tracking for secure identification. Acknowledgements For the highest flexibility and to meet changing laboratory Data was kindly provided by Conny Mathay, Wim Ammerlaan needs, the Tecan Freedom EVO workstation can be equipped and Fay Betsou, Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg, 6 rue with a number of extension modules. Nicolas Ernest Barblé, L-1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg. Austria +43 62 46 89 33 Belgium +32 15 42 13 19 China +86 21 2206 3206 Denmark +45 70 23 44 50 France +33 4 72 76 04 80 Germany +49 79 51 94 170 Italy +39 02 92 44 790 Japan +81 44 556 73 11 Netherlands +31 18 34 48 174 Singapore +65 644 41 886 Spain +34 93 490 01 74 Sweden +46 31 75 44 000 Switzerland +41 44 922 89 22 UK +44 118 9300 300 USA +1 919 361 5200 Other countries +41 44 922 8125 Tecan Group Ltd. makes every effort to include accurate and up-to-date information within this publication; however, it is possible that omissions or errors might have occurred. Tecan Group Ltd. cannot, therefore, make any representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this publication. Changes in this publication can be made at any time without notice. For technical details and detailed procedures of the specifications provided in this document please contact your Tecan representative. This publication may contain reference to applications and products which are not available in all markets. Please check with your local sales representative. All mentioned trademarks are protected by law. In general, the trademarks and designs referenced herein are trademarks, or registered trademarks, of Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland. A complete list may be found at www.tecan.com/trademarks. Product names and company names that are not contained in the list but are noted herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. Tecan and Freedom EVO are registered trademarks of Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterization of Buffy Coat-Derived Granulocytes for Clinical
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Neutrophil defects and deficiencies van de Geer, A. Publication date 2020 Document Version Other version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): van de Geer, A. (2020). Neutrophil defects and deficiencies. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:01 Oct 2021 Chapter 6 1 Characterization of buffy-coat-derived granulocytes for clinical use: a 2 comparison with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor/dexamethasone- pretreated donor-derived products. 3 Annemarie van de Geer1, Roel P. Gazendam1, Anton T.J. Tool1, John L. van Hamme1, Dirk de Korte1,2, Timo K. van den Berg1, Sacha S. Zeerleder3,4 and Taco W. Kuijpers1,5. 4 1. Dept. of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2.
    [Show full text]
  • (2019). Manufacturing Variables and Hemostatic Function of Cold Stored Platelets: a Systematic Review of the Literature
    Scorer, T., Williams, A., Reddoch-Cardenas, K., & Mumford, A. (2019). Manufacturing Variables and Hemostatic Function of Cold Stored Platelets: A Systematic review of the Literature. Transfusion, 59(8), 2722 - 2732. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15396 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1111/trf.15396 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Wiley at 10.1111/trf.15396 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Manufacturing Variables and Hemostatic Function of Cold Stored Platelets: A Systematic review of the Literature Thomas Scorer1,2,3 Ashleigh Williams4 Kristin Reddoch-Cardenas3 Andrew Mumford1 1. School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK 2. Centre of Defence Pathology, RCDM, Birmingham, UK 3. Coagulation and Blood Research, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Ft Sam Houston, Texas, USA. 4. Department of Anaesthesia, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Word count: 4352 Abstract word count - 250 Number of figures and tables: 3 figures and 5 tables References: 54 Corresponding author: Dr Tom Scorer, Research Floor Level 7, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW United Kingdom. Email: [email protected] The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Blood Separation and Apheresis Instrumentation
    Principles of Blood Separation and Apheresis Instrumentation Dobri Kiprov, M.D., H.P. Chief, Division of Immunotherapy, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA Medical Director, Apheresis Care Group Apheresis History Apheresis History Apheresis History Apheresis From the Greek - “to take away” Blood separation Donor apheresis Therapeutic apheresis Principles of Blood Separation Filtration Centrifugation Combined centrifugation and filtration Membrane Separation Blood is pumped through a membrane with pores allowing plasma to pass through whilst retaining blood cells. Available as a hollow fiber membrane (older devices used parallel-plate membranes) Pore diameter for plasma separation: 0.2 to 0.6μm. A number of parameters need to be closely controlled Detail of Membrane Separation Courtesy of CaridianBCT Membrane Blood Separation Trans Membrane Pressure (TMP) Too High = Hemolysis TMP Too Low = No Separation Optimal TMP = Good Separation Membrane Apheresis in the US - PrismaFlex (Gambro – Baxter) - NxStage - BBraun Filtration vs. Centrifugation Apheresis Filtration Centrifugation Minimal availability The standard in the in the USA USA • Poor industry support • Very good industry support Limited to plasma Multiple procedures (cytapheresis) exchange • Opportunity to provide • Low efficiency cellular therapies Centrifugation vs. Filtration Apheresis Centrifugation Apheresis Filtration Apheresis Blood Flow 10 – 100 ml/min 150 ml/min Efficiency of Plasma 60 – 65% 30% Removal Apheresis in Clinical Practice and Blood Banking Sickle Cell Disease Falciparum Malaria Thrombocytosis RBC WBC PLT Plasma Leukemias TTP-HUS Cell Therapies Guillain Barre Syndrome Myasthenia Gravis CIDP Autoimmune Renal Disease Hyperviscosity Syndromes Centrifugal Separation Based on the different specific gravity of the blood components. In some instruments, also based on the cellular size (Elutriation).
    [Show full text]
  • Joint UKBTS Professional Advisory Committee (1)
    Joint UKBTS Professional Advisory Committee (1) Position Statement Granulocyte Therapy November 2017 Revised by: Edwin Massey, Simon Stanworth, Suzy Morton, & Rebecca Cardigan at the request of the Standing Advisory Committee on Blood Components November 2017 - The contents of this document are believed to be current. Please continue to refer to the website for in-date versions. Introduction Granulocyte transfusions continue to be requested by clinicians for use in patients with refractory infection or at high risk of developing severe infection (Strauss 2003). Most patients prescribed granulocyte transfusions are those with cancer related neutropenia, who are receiving myeloablative chemotherapy with or without haemopoietic stem cell rescue. Interest in the use of granulocytes remains high (Van Burik & Weisdorf, 2002; Price 2006), and requests for granulocyte components for transfusion were steadily increasing in the UK until 2015 but since then requests have been more stable or even reduced. This pattern has been driven by publications describing transfusion in neutropenic patients both for therapeutic indications, when they have an infection refractory to antimicrobials (Hubel et al. 2002) and for secondary prophylaxis, in patients who have had severe bacterial or fungal infections previously but who require a further cycle of chemotherapy or haemopoietic stem cell rescue (Kerr et al. 2003, Oza et al., 2006). A number of studies with variable or promising, but overall inconclusive, results have been reported both in adults (Oza et al. 2006, Seidel et al, 2008) and children (Sachs et al., 2006). More recently, a further trial in North America was published: The Resolving Infection in Neutropenia with Granulocytes (RING) study (Price et al, 2015); this is discussed in more detail below.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Buffy Coat and Traditional Blood Smears in the Microscopic Diagnosis of Malaria
    International Journal of Malaria Research and Reviews www.resjournals.org/IJMR ISSN: 2346-7266 Vol. 2(2): 7-12, November, 2014 Comparing the Buffy Coat and Traditional Blood Smears in the Microscopic Diagnosis of Malaria Anna Longdoh Njunda1, Dickson Shey Nsagha2, Jules Clement Nguedia Assob1,3, Tayong Dizzle Bita Kwenti4, Nfor Loveline Giwe1 and Tebit Emmanuel Kwenti1,4* 1Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.B. 63, Buea, Cameroon 2Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.B. 63, Buea, Cameroon 3Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.B. 63, Buea, Cameroon 4Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Buea, P.B. 63, Buea, Cameroon *Email for Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel:+(237)97979776 #All Authors contributed equally ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to compare buffy coat smear (BCS) and traditional blood smear (TBS) in the microscopic diagnosis of malaria using Giemsa-stained blood films. Blood samples were collected from 130 patients clinically suspected of malaria. Thin and thick blood films were prepared using whole blood and buffy coat for each sample. The Giemsa-stained slides were examined to determine the number of parasites per high power field (HPF). Data were analysed using the student T test, Chi-square and correlation analysis. Eleven (8.5 %; CI: 3.7 – 13.3) specimen were positive for the TBS and 16 (12.3 %; CI: 6.7 – 18) were positive for the BCS including all the specimens that were positive with the TBS.
    [Show full text]
  • Donor Granulocyte Transfusions in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies and in Recipients of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
    Review Article iMedPub Journals Journal of Stem Cell Biology and Transplantation 2019 www.imedpub.com ISSN 2575-7725 Vol.3 No.1:1 DOI: 10.21767/2575-7725.100022 Donor Granulocyte Transfusions in Patients Al-Jasser AM1 and Al-Anazi 2* with Hematologic Malignancies and in KA Recipients of Hematopoietic Stem Cell 1 Riyadh Regional Laboratory, Ministry of Transplantation Health, Saudi Arabia 2 Department of Adult Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Oncology Center, King Abstract Fahad Specialist Hospital, Saudi Arabia Despite the progress achieved in antimicrobial therapies and supportive care, infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies and in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell *Corresponding author: Khalid A. Al-Anazi transplantation. In the 1990s, there was renewed interest in donor granulocyte transfusions due to the availability of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and advanced apheresis technology. The results of several clinical trials did not show [email protected] clear advantage of adding granolucyte concentrates to antimicrobial therapies due to significant defects that affected the final results of these trials. Department of Adult Hematology and With the recent increase in incidence of multidrug resistant bacteria and invasive Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, fungal infections in neutropenic patients and the reduced efficacy of the recently Oncology Center, King Fahad Specialist introduced antimicrobial agents, the need for transfusing donor granulocytes Hospital, Saudi Arabia. to these patients is renewed again. However, well designed, multicenter randomized controlled trials that include large numbers of patients are needed to Tel: 966-03-8431111 determine the effectiveness of donor granulocyte transfusions in these severely Fax: 966-03-8427420 immunocompromised patients.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Buffy Coat 400 V6 DSP Protocol
    QIAsymphony SP Protocol Sheet DNA_Buffy_Coat_400_V6_DSP protocol General information For in vitro diagnostic use. This protocol is for purification of total genomic and mitochondrial DNA from fresh or frozen buffy coat using the QIAsymphony® SP and the QIAsymphony DSP DNA Midi Kit. Kit QIAsymphony DSP DNA Midi Kit (cat. no. 937255) Sample material Buffy coat (EDTA, citrate, or heparin anti-coagulated) Protocol name DNA_BC_400_V6_DSP Default Assay Control Set ACS_BC_400_V6_DSP Editable Elution volume: 200 µl, 400 µl Required software version Version 4.0 September 2012 Sample & Assay Technologies “Sample” drawer Sample type Buffy coat (EDTA, citrate, or heparin anti-coagulated) Sample volume Depends on type of sample tube used; for more information see www.qiagen.com/goto/dsphandbooks. Primary sample tubes n/a Secondary sample tubes For more information see www.qiagen.com/goto/dsphandbooks. Inserts Depends on type of sample tube used; for more information see www.qiagen.com/goto/dsphandbooks. n/a = not applicable. “Reagents and Consumables” drawer Position A1 and/or A2 Reagent cartridge Position B1 n/a Tip rack holder 1–17 Disposable filter-tips, 200 µl or 1500 µl Unit box holder 1–4 Unit boxes containing sample prep cartridges or 8-Rod Covers n/a = not applicable. “Waste” drawer Unit box holder 1–4 Empty unit boxes Waste bag holder Waste bag Liquid waste bottle holder Empty liquid waste bottle “Eluate” drawer Elution rack (we For more information see recommend using slot 1, www.qiagen.com/goto/dsphandbooks. cooling position) QIAsymphony SP Protocol Sheet: DNA_Buffy_Coat_400_V6_DSP page 2 of 4 Required plasticware Three One batch, Two batches, batches, Four batches, 24 samples* 48 samples* 72 samples* 96 samples* Disposable 4 4 4 8 filter-tips, 200 µl†‡ Disposable 110 212 314 424 filter-tips, 1500 µl†‡ Sample prep 18 36 54 72 cartridges§ 8-Rod Covers¶ 3 6 9 12 * Use of less than 24 samples per batch decreases the number of disposable filter-tips required per run.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Blood Smears, Quantitative Buffy Coat and Rapid
    iolog ter y & c P a a B r f a o s Sreekanth, i l Journal of Bacteriology and t et al. J Bacteriol Parasitol 2011, 2:8 o a l n o r g u DOI: 10.4172/2155-9597.1000125 y o J Parasitology ISSN: 2155-9597 Research Article Open Access Evaluation of Blood Smears, Quantitative Buffy Coat and Rapid Diagnostic Tests in the Diagnosis of Malaria B.Sreekanth1, Shalini Shenoy M2, K.Sai Lella1, N.Girish1 and Ravi Shankar Reddy1 1Department of Microbiology, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, Nalgonda Dist, Andhra Pradesh, India 2Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India Abstract Rapid diagnosis of malaria is important for the administration of effective treatment, to reduce the morbidity and mortality. The present study was carried out to compare the efficacy of quantitative buffy coat (QBC) and rapid diagnostic test (RDT) with conventional peripheral blood smears. Blood samples from 100 patients were obtained with symptoms suggestive of malaria. A total of 74(74%) cases were positive by blood smears, while 80(80%) and 71(71%), were positive by QBC and RDT(Falcivax). Blood smears indicated that 74% (55 0f 74) of the patients were positive for P.vivax and 25% (19 of 74) were infected with P.falciparum. QBC showed that 75 % (60 0f 80) were positive for P.vivax and 25% (20 of 80) were infected with P.falciparum. Falcivax identified 74 % (53 of 71) were positive forP.vivax and 25 % (18 of 71) of P.falciparum. QBC had a sensitivity and specificity of 74.3% and 80.7% forP.vivax and 100% and 98.7% for P.falciparum.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Indications for Apheresis and Whole Blood Pooled Platelets
    CLINICAL INDICATIONS FOR APHERESIS AND WHOLE BLOOD POOLED PLATELETS A National Statement November 2015 1 CONTENTS SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 4 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 6 PRODUCT COMPARISON ................................................................................................... 7 Points to consider ............................................................................................................... 10 Platelet content and quality ........................................................................................... 10 Efficacy ............................................................................................................................ 10 Acute non‐haemolytic transfusion reactions ................................................................. 10 Transfusion transmissible infections (TTI) ...................................................................... 10 Alloimmunisation and platelet refractoriness ................................................................ 11 STATEMENTS ................................................................................................................... 13 Consensus Statement 1 ...................................................................................................... 13 Consensus Statement 2 .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IDEXX Vetautoread Hematology Analyzer—Casebook  Bcp 2 Buffy Coat Profile 2: Normal Cat
    IDEXX VetAutoread™ Hematology Analyzer Casebook w Casebook An explanation of numerous analyzer reports as compiled by: Dr. Allan Hart (deceased) Laboratory Director New Haven Central Hospital for Veterinary Medicine Rufus James Chief Laboratory Technician New Haven Central Hospital for Veterinary Medicine IDEXX gratefully acknowledges the efforts of Dr. Allan Hart (deceased), Laboratory Director, New Haven Central Hospital for Veterinary Hospital and Rufus James, Chief Laboratory Technician, New Haven Central Hospital for Veterinary Medicine, for the explanation of the numerous analyzer reports that were compiled for this casebook. To commemorate the memory of Dr. Hart, IDEXX has established the Allan Hart Scholarship for senior veterinary students who show exceptional proficiency in clinical pathology. The recommendations contained in this casebook are intended to provide general guidance only. As with any diagnosis or treatment, you should use clinical discretion with each patient, including evaluation of history, physical presentation and complete laboratory data. With respect to any drug therapy or monitoring program, refer to product inserts for a complete description of dosages, indications, interactions and cautions. © 2006 IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. VetTube is a trademark of IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. VetAutoread is a trademark of QBC Diagnostics, Inc. One IDEXX Drive Westbrook, Maine 04092 USA idexx.com Contents Buffy Coat Profiles 1–4: Normal Dog, Cat, Horse and Cow
    [Show full text]
  • Platelet Concentrates, from Whole Blood Or Collected by Apheresis?
    Transfusion and Apheresis Science 48 (2013) 129–131 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Transfusion and Apheresis Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/transci Review Platelet concentrates, from whole blood or collected by apheresis? Pieter F. van der Meer Sanquin Blood Bank, Department of Product and Process Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands article info abstract Platelet concentrates can be isolated from donated whole blood with the platelet-rich plasma-method or the buffy coat-method. Alternatively, platelets can be obtained by apheresis, harvesting the platelets but returning all other cells to the donor. The quality and characteristics of platelets during storage are affected by a number of factors, such as anticoagulant, centrifugation and processing after collection, and pre- or post storage pooling, but when comparing literature on the various methods, most differences balance out. To have sufficient platelets to treat an adult patient, whole-blood-derived platelet con- centrates need pooling of multiple donations, thereby increasing the risk of infectious agent transmission at least two-fold as compared with apheresis units. Allo immunization rates, acute reaction rates, and transfusion related acute lung injury rates are not different. Apheresis donation procedures have fewer adverse events. All these factors need to be con- sidered and weighed when selecting a method of platelet collection for a blood center. Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction . ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Leukopak 101: a Brief Review of Apheresis Lily C
    White Paper | September 2016 Leukopak 101: A Brief Review of Apheresis Lily C. Trajman, Ph.D. Introduction Apheresis refers to the process by which blood is removed from a patient and separated into its constituent parts, allowing the removal of one specific component from the blood while the remainder is returned to the patient. Apheresis was first described over 100 years ago – by John Abel in 1914 – and has been used as a therapy for a number of different diseases, including sickle cell anemia and certain types of cancer (Korsack, 2016). In 1971 MD Anderson Cancer Center first used apheresis as a method for isolating peripheral blood stem cells (Korbling, 2011); subsequent breakthroughs in stem cell mobilization and cryopreservation have made apheresis the predominant method for peripheral blood stem cell collection. This paper will discuss the development of apheresis as a viable therapy as well as the current uses of apheresis in medicine. Separation protocols The main principle behind apheresis is the separation of donor blood into its component parts by either centrifugation or membrane filtration. Initial protocols relied on centrifugation to separate blood components by density, with erythrocytes at the bottom, overlaid by the Buffy Coat (comprised of granulocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes and platelets), and plasma as the top layer (Figure 1). Apheresis machines (Figure 2A) are characterized as either continuous flow (blood is withdrawn from one limb, centrifuged, and returned to the donor via another limb) or intermittent flow (blood is withdrawn, centrifuged, and the desired components returned to the patient by reversing the flow of the lumen line).
    [Show full text]