The Influence of Release Strategy and Migration History on Capture Rate of Oncorhynchus Mykiss in a Rotary Screw Trap Ian A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Influence of Release Strategy and Migration History on Capture Rate of Oncorhynchus Mykiss in a Rotary Screw Trap Ian A This article was downloaded by: [Department Of Fisheries] On: 28 February 2013, At: 22:44 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK North American Journal of Fisheries Management Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujfm20 The Influence of Release Strategy and Migration History on Capture Rate of Oncorhynchus mykiss in a Rotary Screw Trap Ian A. Tattam a d , James R. Ruzycki b , Peter B. Bayley c , Hiram W. Li a & Guillermo R. Giannico c a Oregon Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, USA b Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Eastern Oregon University, 203 Badgley Hall, One University Boulevard, LaGrande, Oregon, 97850, USA c Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, USA d Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Post Office Box 9, John Day, Oregon, Oregon, 97845, USA Version of record first published: 19 Feb 2013. To cite this article: Ian A. Tattam , James R. Ruzycki , Peter B. Bayley , Hiram W. Li & Guillermo R. Giannico (2013): The Influence of Release Strategy and Migration History on Capture Rate of Oncorhynchus mykiss in a Rotary Screw Trap, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 33:2, 237-244 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02755947.2012.758202 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 33:237–244, 2013 C American Fisheries Society 2013 ISSN: 0275-5947 print / 1548-8675 online DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2012.758202 ARTICLE The Influence of Release Strategy and Migration History on Capture Rate of Oncorhynchus mykiss in a Rotary Screw Trap Ian A. Tattam*1 Oregon Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA James R. Ruzycki Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Eastern Oregon University, 203 Badgley Hall, One University Boulevard, LaGrande, Oregon 97850, USA Peter B. Bayley Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA Hiram W. Li Oregon Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA Guillermo R. Giannico Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA Abstract Rotary screw traps are used in rivers throughout the west coast of North America to capture emigrating juvenile salmonids. Calibrating the capture efficiency of each trap is essential for valid estimates of fish passage. We released PIT-tagged Oncorhynchus mykiss upstream of a rotary screw trap in the South Fork John Day River, Oregon, to estimate capture efficiency. We used three strategies for release of fish recently captured in the trap. We recaptured 28% of medium-sized fish (86–145 mm FL) and 14% of large-sized fish (146–230 mm FL) released during daylight 1.6 km upstream from the trap. We recaptured 33% of medium-sized fish and 17% of large-sized fish released Downloaded by [Department Of Fisheries] at 22:44 28 February 2013 during daylight 4.8 km upstream from the trap. We recaptured 42% of medium-sized fish and 23% of large-sized fish released at twilight 1.8 km upstream from the trap. A PIT tag antenna detected summer-tagged parr (which were PIT-tagged upstream 1–5 months before migration) as they approached the trap to evaluate potential bias from reduced recapture of recently trapped fish. We captured 53% of the medium-sized first-time migrants and 40% of the large-sized first-time migrants. Although average capture efficiencies of first-time migrants were greater than those from any of the recently trapped fish from the three release strategies, twilight releases of recently trapped fish were the least negatively biased, especially for medium-sized fish. Extensive population monitoring of salmonid fishes across et al. 1991). Returns of adult anadromous salmonids are in- the west coast of North America (Volkhardtet al. 2007) has been fluenced by numerous factors in freshwater and marine life initiated in response to declining salmonid abundance (Nehlsen stages. Survival rates in migratory corridors and in the ocean are *Corresponding author: [email protected] 1Present address: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Post Office Box 9, John Day, Oregon 97845, USA. Received May 7, 2012; accepted December 6, 2012 237 238 TATTAM ET AL. variable (Bilton et al. 1982; Achord et al. 2007) and may mask movement patterns. There has been no evaluation of whether the influence of freshwater rearing areas on production. Hence, these protocols result in equal capture efficiency between recent there is a need to determine abundance by life stage (Solazzi releases and migrants that have not been previously captured et al. 2000; Johnson et al. 2005) to measure effects of proximate in an RST. We evaluated these protocols by estimating capture factors, such as marine survival (Pyper et al. 2002). Most of- efficiency for Oncorhynchus mykiss that were PIT-tagged 1–5 ten such life history monitoring involves estimation of numbers months before their downstream migration (hereafter “summer- of (1) out-migrant juveniles emigrating from freshwater, and tagged parr”) and monitored by a PIT tag antenna immediately (2) adults returning to freshwater to spawn. upstream from an RST. Abundance estimates of juvenile salmonids emigrating from The three objectives of this study were: (1) compare esti- rearing habitats require out-migrant traps, except in the few mates of the capture efficiency of an RST among recent releases situations where census counts may be conducted at weirs. A made during daylight hours in two different locations and recent common out-migrant trap throughout the west coast of North releases made after the end of civil twilight, (2) develop a size- America is the rotary screw trap (RST; E.G. Solutions, Corvallis, structured model predicting capture efficiency for juvenile O. Oregon). Rotary screw caps can be nested inside weirs (Scace mykiss, and (3) validate the accuracy of the model by compar- et al. 2007) to increase capture efficiency. This can potentially ing the model-predicted capture efficiency for recent releases result in overcrowding of the holding box, causing mortality against estimates of capture efficiency for summer-tagged parr of biologically and economically valuable fishes (Music et al. detected by an antenna as they approached an RST. 2010). Thus, RSTs are commonly used as a “stand-alone” gear that samples a portion of the channel profile and captures a portion of the emigrant population. Valid estimates of capture METHODS efficiency are required for each RST in each location (Thedinga Site description.—This study was conducted in the South et al. 1994; Roper and Scarnecchia 2000) in order to estimate Fork John Day River (SFJD), a fifth-order basin located in out-migrant abundance. northeastern Oregon (Figure 1). The SFJD supports a natu- Capture efficiency varies depending on stream size, water rally reproducing population of O. mykiss, including resident velocity, water depth, cone rotation speed, and fish size (Roper and anadromous life history types. No hatchery stocking occurs and Scarnecchia 2000). The most commonly used method of in this basin, so all O. mykiss observed in this study were natu- estimating capture efficiency is to capture unmarked fish in the rally produced. Oncorhynchus mykiss are widely distributed in trap, apply a unique mark or tag, such as a PIT tag (Schultz et al. the SFJD and its four main tributaries downstream from Izee 2006; Copeland and Venditti 2009), and release the marked fish Falls, a barrier for anadromous fish movement (Figure 1). Em- upstream of the RST. The proportion of these marked fish (here- igration of juvenile O. mykiss from the SFJD is bimodal, with after referred to as “recent releases”) subsequently recaptured peaks occurring in October–November and April–May. During in the trap estimates capture efficiency for that sample period fall 2005, we estimated that 3,966 O. mykiss migrated past this (Thedinga et al. 1994; Miller et al. 2000). This mark–recapture RST site (I. Tattam, unpublished data). The O. mykiss captured population estimation technique is subject to the assumptions in the trap during this period ranged in fork length (FL) from 82 of the Petersen estimate (Seber 1982). Violation of any of these to 227 mm, with a mean of 140 mm. assumptions can result in erroneous population estimates (Frith We operated a 1.52-m-diameter RST at river kilometer 10 of et al. 1995). The most pertinent, yet seldom evaluated, is the as- the SFJD (Figure 1). An RST comprises a partially submerged sumption of equal capture efficiency of marked and unmarked cone with an interior helical structure that is passively rotated fish. For an estimate of catch efficiency to be unbiased the cap- by water pressure and funnels emigrant fish into a submerged Downloaded by [Department Of Fisheries] at 22:44 28 February 2013 ture efficiency of recent releases, which are fish captured in an holding box on the downstream end of the trap.
Recommended publications
  • Solitary Islands Marine Park Guide
    Solitary Islands Marine Park Guide The NSW marine environment is one of our state’s greatest natural assets and Introduction needs to be managed for the greatest wellbeing of the community, now and into the future. The NSW Solitary Islands Marine Park was the first marine park declared in NSW. Located on the Coffs Coast, the park covers more than 70,000 hectares and 100 kilometres of coastline from the northern side of Muttonbird Island at Coffs Harbour north to Plover Island at the entrance to the Sandon River. It extends from the mean high water mark and upper tidal limits of coastal estuaries and lakes, seaward to the three nautical mile limit of NSW waters and includes the entire seabed. The Solitary Islands Marine Park (Commonwealth waters) covers 15,200 hectares on the seaward side of the NSW Solitary Islands Marine Park, out to the 50 metre depth contour. The Solitary Islands Marine Park (Commonwealth waters) is managed in partnership by the NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) Fisheries and Parks Australia. The NSW Solitary Islands Marine Park management rules protect the marine biodiversity of the area while supporting a wide range of social, cultural and economic values. This guide and accompanying map summarise the management rules for the NSW Solitary Islands Marine Park. For information on Solitary Islands Marine Park (Commonwealth waters) management zones please refer to the map that accompanies this guide or contact Parks Australia. 2 SOLITARY ISLANDS MARINE PARK (NSW) & SOLITARY ISLANDS MARINE PARK (COMMONWEALTH WATERS) GUIDE provides opportunities for swimming, surfing, snorkelling, Unique environmental diving, boating, fishing, walking, and panoramic ocean vistas.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport for NSW Mid-North Coast Regional Boating Plan
    Transport for NSW Regional Boating Plan Mid-North Coast Region February 2015 Transport for NSW 18 Lee Street Chippendale NSW 2008 Postal address: PO Box K659 Haymarket NSW 1240 Internet: www.transport.nsw.gov.au Email: [email protected] ISBN Register: 978 -1 -922030 -68 -9 © COPYRIGHT STATE OF NSW THROUGH THESECRETARY OF TRANSPORT FOR NSW 2014 Extracts from this publication may be reproduced provided the source is fully acknowledged. Report for Transport for NSW - Regional Boating Plan| i Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Physical character of the waterways .............................................................................................. 6 2.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Bellinger and Nambucca catchments and Coffs Harbour area ........................................... 7 2.3 Macleay catchment .............................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Hastings catchment ............................................................................................................. 9 2.5 Lord Howe Island ............................................................................................................... 11 2.6 Inland waterways ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Community Resource
    A COMMUNITY RESOURCE Acknowledgements Production of this publication has been made possible through the Australian Governments Caring for Our Country Program – Community Action Grants 2009/2010. I would like to acknowledge the assistance of other people and organisations in compiling information for the Clarence Coast and Estuary Resource Kit including CVC and NRCMA staff for their contribution of photos, maps and use of information from their projects and management plans. Pam Kenway and Debrah Novak for contributing their photos, Frances Belle Parker “Beiirrinba” image. The landowners, industries and farmers who are adopting sustainable land management practices and the people who volunteer their time towards caring for the environment. Further acknowledgements are noted throughout the resource kit. This book is based on English, N (2007) Coast and Estuary Resource Kit – A Community Resource for the Nambucca, Macleay and Hastings Valleys produced by Nambucca Valley Landcare Inc. through the National Landcare Program and Northern Rivers CMA. Aboriginal Australians Acknowledgement The Clarence estuary, coast and associated landscapes are part of the traditional lands of Aboriginal people and their nations, in particular, Yaegl people and their traditional country are acknowledged. Front Cover Image: Julie Mousley Inside Cover Image: Debrah Novak All photos are copyright © of the author Julie Mousley unless named otherwise with the image. Printed March 2011. Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 5: The importance of native vegetation 32 The
    [Show full text]
  • Shorebirds of Northern NSW Final Report
    © Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, 2010 The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW has compiled this document in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. The State of NSW and the Department do not accept responsibility for inaccurate or incomplete information. Readers should seek professional advice when applying this information to their specific circumstances. Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW 59 – 61 Goulburn Street (PO Box A 290) Sydney South NSW 1232 Phone: 02 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (information & publications requests) Fax: 02 9995 5999 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW is pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. This report is an edited version of a report by Sandpiper Ecological Surveys (Dr David Rohweder 2010) ‘Shorebird Data Audit – Northern New South Wales’, an unpublished report to the Department of Environment Climate Change and Water NSW, funded by the Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority. This report should be cited as: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW 2010, Shorebirds of Northern New South Wales, based on a report prepared by D. Rohweder and funded by the Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, Sydney. ISBN 978 1 74232 898 0 DECCW 2010/715 DECCW August 2010 SUMMARY Background This report is an edited version of a report by Sandpiper Ecological Surveys (Dr David Rohweder) ‘Shorebirds Data Audit – Northern New South Wales’ which was prepared for the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW and funded by the Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17: North Coast Region
    Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17: North Coast Region A new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours © Copyright State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) and State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) is part of OEH. Throughout this strategy, references to NPWS should be taken to mean NPWS carrying out functions on behalf of the Director General of the Department of Premier and Cabinet, and the Minister for the Environment. For further information contact: North Coast Region Coastal Branch National Parks and Wildlife Service Office of Environment and Heritage Department of Premier and Cabinet PO Box 361 Grafton 2460 NSW Phone: (02) 6641 1500 Report pollution and environmental incidents Environment Line: 131 555 (NSW only) or [email protected] See also www.environment.nsw.gov.au/pollution Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 PO Box A290, Sydney South, NSW 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Phone: 1300 361 967 (national parks, climate change and energy efficiency information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978 1 74293 617 8 OEH 2012/0366 August 2013 This plan may be cited as: OEH 2012, Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17, North Coast Region: a new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours, Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Formations, Classes and Communities
    Appendix 11: Vegetatiion formatiions, cllasses and communiities Vegetation Vegetation class Vegetation community PVP developer equivalent vegetation Landscape and diagnostic features formation* type Dry sclerophyll Clarence Dry Sclerophyll Forests Baryulgil Serpentinite Complex Eucalyptus ophitica - White Mahogany open forest on Low open or open forest. On serpentinite geology near serpentinite near Baryulgil of the North Coast Baryulgil. Dry sclerophyll Clarence Dry Sclerophyll Forests Coast Range Spotted Gum- Spotted Gum - Blackbutt open forest of the lower Tall to very tall dry open forest. Restricted and patchy Blackbutt Clarence Valley of the North Coast distribution along the Coast Range in the lower Clarence Valley, with a disjunct western occurrence in Grange State Forest. Dry sclerophyll Clarence Dry Sclerophyll Forests Dry Foothills Spotted Gum Spotted Gum dry grassy open forest of the foothills of Tall to very tall open forest. On slopes and ridges of dry the northern North Coast foothills areas of the coastal hinterland and gorges of the northern parts of the North Coast. Dry sclerophyll Clarence Dry Sclerophyll Forests Foothill Grey Gum-Ironbark- Grey Gum - Grey Ironbark open forest of the Clarence Tall to very tall dry forest with a mixed canopy. On Spotted Gum lowlands of the North Coast sandstone and siliceous soils in the Clarence lowlands with a western extension through the southern Richmond Range inland to Ewingar State Forest and the Mann River. Dry sclerophyll Clarence Dry Sclerophyll Forests Foothills Grey Gum-Spotted Gum Grey Gum - Spotted Gum open forest of the southern Tall to very tall open forest. On high and low quartz Clarence lowlands of the North Coast sediments in the southern portion of the Clarence- Moreton Basin mainly south of the Clarence River.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter – Autumn 2017 CLARENCE ENVIRONMENT CENTRE 31 Skinner St, South Grafton 2460 Phone / Fax 66 43 1863 Email: [email protected] Website
    Newsletter – Autumn 2017 CLARENCE ENVIRONMENT CENTRE 31 Skinner St, South Grafton 2460 Phone / Fax 66 43 1863 Email: [email protected] Website www.cec.org.au ____________________________________________________________________ Chaffin Creek drying up Some of those involved with the Upper Coldstream Biodiversity project will recognise the log crossing that we used to cross Chaffin Creek waterholes on the crown land at the northern end of Firth Heinz Road, home to the very healthy Giant Dragonfly population. As you can see there was no need for the 'bridge' when this picture was taken in mid February. The creek had ceased to flow, but I had never seen the waterholes so depleted. I know there was a major drought in the Clarence, and none worse affected than Pillar Valley, but I was still surprised at the dramatic drop in the level of water in these permanent waterholes. It so happens that the crown land is right next to the Pacific Highway upgrade As can be see there was no need for a 'bridge' when this picture (forest now cleared right up was taken in mid February. The creek had ceased to flow. to the crown land boundary), so I went to check on my way out, and guess what the RMS has done? 200m down-stream of the log crossing, the RMS has installed a great big pump and were drawing the last remaining water out of the billabong to suppress dust and help pack down the new road foundations. What the Hell is the 3 year's supply of water stored at Shannon Creek for? Nobody else is using it, and trucks could simply hook up to a hydrant in Tucabia without destroying the riverine habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW North Coast Region Irrigation Profile
    NSW North Coast Region Irrigation Profile compiled by Meredith Hope for the Water Use Efficiency Advisory Unit, Dubbo The Water Use Efficiency Advisory Unit is a NSW Government joint initiative between NSW Agriculture and the Department of Sustainable Natural Resources. # The State of New South Wales NSW Agriculture (2003) This Irrigation Profile is one of a series for NSW catchments and regions. It was written and compiled by Meredith Hope, NSW Agriculture, for the Water Use Efficiency Advisory Unit, 37 Carrington Street, Dubbo, NSW, 2830. ISBN 0 7347 1373 8 (individual) ISBN 0 7347 1372 X (series) Disclaimer: This document has been prepared by the author for NSW Agriculture, for and on behalf of the State of New South Wales, in good faith on the basis of available information. While the information contained in the document has been formulated with all due care, the users of the document must obtain their own advice and conduct their own investigations and assessments of any proposals they are considering, in the light of their own individual circumstances. The document is made available on the understanding that the State of New South Wales, the author and the publisher, their respective servants and agents accept no responsibility for any person, acting on, or relying on, or upon any opinion, advice, representation, statement of information whether expressed or implied in the document, and disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on the information contained in the document or by reason of any error, omission, defect or mis-statement (whether such error, omission or mis-statement is caused by or arises from negligence, lack of care or otherwise).
    [Show full text]
  • Parks Holiday Guide
    NATURe neVEr FELT SO GOoD All parks holiday guide Killen Falls, Ballina 1 MemorAblE stays in unforgETtable plAces Do everything you love to do in some of the most beautiful locations in New South Wales. You and your loved ones will That’s the beauty of the boundless always remember your stay opportunities offered by these at a Reflections Holiday Park. very special holiday destinations. After all, the sweetest memories With everything from camping last the longest. to luxury cabins, when you stay with Reflections there’s an Each of our parks have idyllic accommodation option to suit natural surroundings and every preference and budget. abundance of things to explore. You can do it all – or relax and Your only challenge is choosing do nothing at all. where to start! NSW Crown Holiday Parks Land Manager respectfully acknowledges the traditional owners of country throughout Australia and pays respect to the ongoing living cultures of Australia's First People. 2 FERRY RESERVE MASSY GREENE TERRACE RESERVE CLARKES BEACH BYRON BAY LENNOX HEAD SHAWS BAY BALLINA EVANS HEAD RED ROCK CORINDI BEACH MOONEE BEACH COPETON WATERS COFFS HARBOUR BOAMBEE CREEK RESERVE MYLESTOM URUNGA HUNGRY HEAD ARMIDALE NAMBUCCA HEADS SCOTTS HEAD LAKE KEEPIT TAMWORTH PORT MACQUARIE BONNY HILLS NORTH HAVEN TUNCURRY LAKE GLENBAWN FORSTER BEACH DUBBO SEAL ROCKS HAWKS NEST JIMMYS BEACH LAKE BURRENDONG CUDGEGONG RIVER MOOKERAWA WATERS NEWCASTLE BATHURST CENTRAL COAST SYDNEY GRABINE LAKESIDE WYANGALA WATERS WOLLONGONG KILLALEA RESERVE BURRINJUCK WATERS CANBERRA BATEMANS BAY
    [Show full text]
  • Accessory Publication the Mesoveliidae, Hebridae, And
    Accessory Publication The Mesoveliidae, Hebridae, and Hydrometridae of Australia (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Gerromorpha) with a reanalysis of the phylogeny of semiaquatic bugs Nils Møller AndersenA and Tom A. WeirB AZoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. BCSIRO Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract The semiaquatic bugs (Hemiptera-Heteroptera, infraorder Gerromorpha), comprising water striders and their allies, are familiar inhabitants of water surfaces in all continents. Currently, the world fauna has more than 1,900 described species classified in eight families and 165 genera.A phylogenetic analysis using maximum parsimony was performed on a dataset comprising 56 morphological characters scored for 24 examplar genera covering all families and subfamilies of Gerromorpha. The phylogenetic relationships found concur with those presented by Andersen (1982) except that the relationships between some subfamilies of Veliidae andGerridae are unresolved. The Australian fauna of Gerromorpha comprises six families, 30 genera, and 123 species. One third of the genera and more than 80% of the species are endemic to Australia. Previously, we have covered all Australian species of the families Gerridae, Hermatobatidae, and Veliidae. The present paper deals with the families Hebridae, Hydrometridae, and Mesoveliidae. We offer redescriptions or descriptive notes on all previously described species, describe Mesovelia ebbenielseni sp. nov. (Mesoveliidae), Austrohebrus apterus, gen. et sp. nov., and Hebrus pilosus sp. nov. (Hebridae), and synonymise Hebrus woodwardi Lansbury, syn. nov. (Hebridae) and Hydrometra halei Hungerford and Evans, syn. nov. (Hydrometridae). We present keys for the identification of genera and species, and map the distribution of all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5: Summary of Existing Strategies, Policies and Plans
    Appendiix 5: Summary of exiistiing strategiies, polliiciies and plans Within each section of this appendix, the various international and national strategies and plans are presented first, followed by State, regional and locally relevant documents. The major sections are as follows: 1 Biodiversity ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Migratory species............................................................................................................................. 7 3 Natural resouce management targets ............................................................................................. 8 4 Pests and weeds ........................................................................................................................... 10 5 Strategic landuse planning ............................................................................................................ 15 6 Threatened species ....................................................................................................................... 17 7 Water, wetlands and estuaries ...................................................................................................... 20 8 Coastal ........................................................................................................................................... 29 1 Biiodiversiity International Convention on Biological Diversity 1992 Level: International Relevance: Contributes Author:
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Rivers Regional Biodiversity Management Plan
    Foreword The Northern Rivers Regional Biodiversity Management Plan (the Plan) constitutes the national regional recovery plan under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 for threatened species and ecological communities principally distributed in the Northern Rivers Region of NSW. The Plan is part of an Australian Government-funded pilot to trial the integration of regional recovery and threat abatement planning. It provides a regional approach to the delivery of recovery actions necessary to ensure the long-term viability of threatened species and ecological communities in the Region. The Northern Rivers Region is an area relatively rich in biodiversity data. This has allowed for innovative and sophisticated analysis techniques to be used in this Plan for biodiversity assessment and identification of priority areas for conservation works. These outputs will help guide investment by the Australian Government, New South Wales Government and local authorities in the Region. Collaboration and partnerships will be essential for the implementation of the Plan. The Plan considers all threats affecting biodiversity in the Region, including those associated with the potential impacts of climate change. The Plan also incorporates Indigenous cultural values and considerations into biodiversity management in the Region. It is in this context that the Plan, in association with the approved Border Ranges Rainforest Biodiversity Management Plan (DECCW 2010), sets out an overall strategy for the conservation and restoration
    [Show full text]