DOCSLIB.ORG

The Diocese of Winchester

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Diocese of Winchester NATIONAL ARCHDEACONS’ FORUM serving the Church of England and the Church in Wales The Ministerial Development Review of Archdeacons Many organisations find that review is a very useful tool in developing responsibility and encouraging growth in members of staff. Effective review provides an affirmative place to celebrate what is going well and also a safe space to reflect on what is going less well and to explore what might be needed for those contexts. It is crucial that review is a positive and valuable experience for all concerned, encourages the person being reviewed in their ministerial development, and helps them to be the best ministers they can be, for God, for the Church and for the communities they serve. As Pavlina Wilkin has observed on recent research into MDR: It is apparent from the report’s findings that effective MDR practice has a positive impact on clergy, the diocese and wider Church and that there is much to be gained in enhancing the effectiveness of MDR across all dioceses. Pavlina Wilkin: Ministerial Development Review October 2014:1 We are clear that to achieve the aim of encouraging and developing an archdeacon’s ministry, review must have an ethos which is affirming, celebratory, exploring, appropriately challenging and confidential. It requires a relationship between bishop and archdeacon which is one of fruitful co-operation and which avoids friendly collusion. If this ethos is missing, then the process will not deliver on its purpose. National Expectations In the Church of England, review is required as part of common tenure, and the Archbishops’ Council issued guidance in January 2010. This guidance describes the purpose of review as follows: (1.) Ministerial Development Review (MDR) facilitates a guided discussion framed around an office holder’s ministry. The purpose of the review is to look back and reflect on what has happened over the last year or two of ministry and, informed by that, to look forward to plan, anticipate and develop a clearer vision for what lies ahead. In looking back there is an opportunity to acknowledge all there is to be thankful for and anything that is a matter for lament, and in looking forward to anticipate the changing demands of the role, identify future objectives and areas for potential development. (2.) MDR is founded in the assumption that all office holders are responsible to God for the ministry entrusted to them and that they are accountable to the Church and to one another for the way in which it is exercised. Ministry is a gift and a trust for which each individual holds account. Accountability includes a preparedness to grow and develop on the basis of experience and the learning gained from it. It is about affirmation and encouragement as well as challenge. Ministerial Development Review Guidance 2010 Our recommendation is that review happens every year, even though the regulations require review at least once every two years. Given the nature of the archdeacon’s 1 role, and the different responsibilities archdeacons hold, an annual review is clearly best practice. For archdeacons, their annual review should be with their diocesan bishop, on a one to one basis. Preparation Review is founded on the two key principles of affirmation and accountability. Review is founded on the assumption that we are accountable to God for the ministry entrusted to us, to the Bishop for our licence in the diocese or church, and to one another as fellow members of the Body of Christ. Ministry Review 2011 To ensure that it fulfils these principles, and is searching and enabling, both bishop and archdeacon will need to prepare carefully beforehand. Below you will find a suggested preparatory paper and a suggested external feedback form. They provide a template which you may wish to develop for your situation. Both documents are deliberately not focussed around particular tasks, but designed to give a framework which allows creative exploration and honest discussion. For the external feedback, the archdeacon should choose six people, with a balance between lay and ordained, who between them represent different aspects of their ministry. The following list of possibilities is not exhaustive: • an area dean, • a lay chair, • a member of the Bishop’s Staff team, • a couple of people active in the local community with whom the archdeacon regularly works, • a member of the diocesan staff, • a member of the DAC, • a churchwarden they have worked closely with in the past year, • a sector minister from their archdeaconry. A useful way of doing this is for the archdeacon to approach the six people selected personally, send them the feedback form, receive these forms when they are returned and add their own response before sending them on to the bishop. The review meeting There are many useful guides to good practice in review, to assist both the reviewer and the reviewee to gain most from the process. A very helpful summary is provided in Ministry Review: principles for use in the Anglican dioceses of the SCRTP October 2011, which includes an insightful reflection on scripture and tradition. (see page 3 for more details) The summary record As with all review, the only record will be the summary of the conversation which is agreed by both the bishop and the archdeacon concerned. All other papers will be shredded. The archdeacon should follow up any development needs which have been identified as appropriate, which may include either approaching the person with 2 the CMD responsibility in the diocese or contacting the Archdeacons’ National Executive Officer. Sources Ministerial Development Review Guidance approved by the Archbishops’ Council January 2010 Ministry Review: principles for use in the Anglican dioceses of the SCRTP October 2011 http://www.scrtp.org.uk/policy-documents-and-guidelines/ Pavlina Wilkin: Ministerial Development Review, the top five dioceses A paper of the National Continuing Ministry Development Panel October 2014 http://www.ministrydevelopment.org.uk/case_studies/62 Our thanks to the Diocese of Salisbury and the Diocese of London for sharing material which has greatly aided the production of this guidance. NB 06.03.2015 3 NATIONAL ARCHDEACONS’ FORUM serving the Church of England and the Church in Wales THE CORE DUTIES OF AN ARCHDEACON The work of an archdeacon varies from diocese to diocese and even between archdeacons within dioceses. Each archdeacon should have a role description which is available and reviewed as part of the MDR process. But there are core functions which rest with archdeacons and skills and abilities which most archdeacons need. This document seeks to assist the MDR process by • providing an introduction about the ministry of an archdeacon, copied from the report Sustaining Leaders in Mission and Change OXCEPT 2011 • listing the Legal Responsibilities (copied from the document produced y the Legal Office) • identifying some core skills. THE ROLE OF THE ARCHDEACON “The role of the Archdeacon is a senior leadership role in the dioceses with an important contribution to mission and strategy. It is a key support to the clergy, their families, to Churchwardens, and Area/Rural Deans. The consistent image is of an intermediary, an interpreter, a channel through which the diocese’s strategy is communicated and implemented in the local church. Archdeacons are seen as needing to be spiritually secure and strategic thinkers. In all but a few cases, they have a statutory role with the jurisdiction of an Ordinary. The role is based on handling the tension between encouraging mission and creativity and ensuring that the order of the Church of England is maintained. Conflict is a regular feature of their work in their interpretive position between a range of different worlds and viewpoints. This means that developed people skills are essential. The role can be very busy and stressful. However, many Archdeacons use their statutory functions to encourage imaginative, mission based thinking amongst local clergy and churches.” OXCEPT 2011:3 LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF AN ARCHDEACON The office of archdeacon has its origins in the early history of the Church. An archdeaconry is a legal division of a diocese for administrative purposes within which the archdeacon exercises an ordinary jurisdiction. The essential nature of the role has been described as ‘being a good steward so that others are freed to be the worshipping, witnessing and ministering Church’. The legal responsibilities of an archdeacon are summarised below. 4 Diocesan governance 1. The archdeacon is a member, ex officio, of • the Diocesan Synod (Church Representation Rules 2011, Rule 30(4)); • the Diocesan Advisory Committee (DAC) (Care of Churches and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Measure 1991, Schedule 1); • the Diocesan Parsonages Board (Repair of Benefice Buildings Measure 1972, s.1(4)); and • the Diocesan Mission and Pastoral Committee (Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011, Schedule 1). Parochial governance 2. An archdeacon has a duty to hold visitations in his or her archdeaconry as provided in Canon C 22, paragraph 5. 3. On receiving a valid request to convene an extraordinary meeting of a PCC, the archdeacon must do so if he or she deems there is sufficient cause. The archdeacon must also chair the meeting or appoint a deputy to do so (Church Representation Rules 2011, Rule 23(1)). 4. At the direction of the bishop, the archdeacon inducts a priest who has been instituted to a benefice into the possession of its temporalities (Canon C22, paragraph 5). Although the archdeacon has no statutory role under the Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986, in practice he or she is usually actively involved in guiding parishes through the appointments procedure. Buildings and property 5. In his or her own archdeaconry, the archdeacon is a key player in the operation of the faculty jurisdiction under the Care of Churches and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Measure 1991 and the Faculty Jurisdiction Rules 2013.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Operational Report Diocese of Exeter
    Operational Report Diocese of Exeter April – June 2018 Contents Overall Summary ……………………………………………………………… Page 3 Governance …………………………………………………………………... Page 4 Mission and Pastoral Office …………………………………………………… Page 6 Finance ………………………………………………………………………… Page 8 Stewardship ……………………………………………………………………. Page 11 Communications ………………………………………………………………. Page 12 Safeguarding …………………………………………………………………… Page 14 Clergy Housing ………………………………………………………………... Page 16 School Building Projects. …………………………………………………….... Page 17 Church Buildings ………………………………………………………………. Page 17 New Housing Areas …………………………………………………………… Page 19 Growing the Rural Church ……………………………………………………. Page 20 Education ………………………………………………………………………. Page 21 Mission and Ministry …………………………………………...……………… Page 24 Mission and Ministry Development Team ……………………………..……… Page 27 Diocesan Mission Enabler ……………………………………………………... Page 29 Children’s Ministry Adviser ………………………………………………….... Page 31 Youth Work Adviser ………………………………………………………….. Page 33 Church and Society ……………………………………………………………. Page 34 Plymouth Archdeaconry ………………………………………………………. Page 35 Plymouth Strategic Development Fund Project ………………………………. Page 35 Appendix ~ Diocesan Vision and Strategy Key Aims ……..…………………... Page 36 Diocese of Exeter: Quarterly Operational Report ~ Q2 2018 Page | 2 Overall Summary I am delighted to introduce you to our second Quarterly Operational Report. The response to our new reporting format from all levels of the Diocese was exceptionally positive when we first published back in April. However, we will
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Church of Australia
    ANGLICAN CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA Diocese of Willochra Prayer Diary November 2020 Page 1 of 32 DAY 1 Diocese of Willochra: • The Bishop John Stead (Jan); • Assistant Bishop and Vicar General Chris McLeod (Susan); • Chancellor of the Diocese of Willochra, Nicholas Iles (Jenny); • Chaplain to the Bishop, The Rev’d Anne Ford (Michael); • The Dean of the Cathedral Church of Sts Peter and Paul, The Very Rev’d Dr Mary Lewis (Owen); • The Cathedral Chapter, The Bishop John Stead (Jan), The Very Rev’d Dr Mary Lewis (Owen); Archdeacons – the Ven Gael Johannsen (George), the Ven Heather Kirwan, the Ven Andrew Lang (Louise); Canons – the Rev’d Canon Ali Wurm, the Rev’d Canon John Fowler, Canon Michael Ford (Anne), Canon Mary Woollacott; Cathedral Wardens - Pauline Matthews and Jean Housley • The Archdeacons, The Ven Heather Kirwan – Eyre and The Ven Andrew Lang (Louise) - Wakefield Diocese of Adelaide: Fullarton: Julie Worrall (Peter) Diocese of The Murray: Bishop Keith Dalby (Alice) In the Anglican Church of Australia: The Anglican Church of Australia; Primate, Archbishop Geoff Smith (Lynn); General Secretary, Anne Hywood (Peter); General Synod and Standing Committee In the Partner Diocese of Mandalay: Bishop David Nyi Nyi Naing (Mary), Rev’d John Suan and the Diocesan and Cathedral Staff Worldwide Anglican Cycle of Prayer: • Pray for the Church of the Province of West Africa • Primate and Metropolitan, Church of the Province of West Africa; Archbishop of the Internal province of West Africa and Bishop of Liberia: Archbishop Dr Jonathan Bau-Bau Bonaparte
    [Show full text]
  • Giving Adviser Application Pack, Salisbury Diocese
    Information pack for the post of Giving Adviser 1 Contents Welcome from the Director of Finance and Asset Management…………………………....3 Job Description………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 Person Specification………………………………………………………………………………………………6 About the Diocese of Salisbury……………………………………..………….……………………………7 General Terms of Employment………………………………………………………………….......……13 Application Process………………………………………………………………………………………………13 2 Welcome Thank you very much for your interest in this important post in the Diocese of Salisbury. The foci of our Diocesan strategy – Renewing Hope – are “pray, serve, grow”, and giving and generosity has been identified as a key driver, particularly in relation to “grow”. As a priority work area for the diocese we want to challenge ourselves about generosity and manage our assets well so that we grow new income and release funds for pioneering work in mission and ministry. Average planed giving per person per week according to the latest statistics in Salisbury Diocese is £10 ranking Salisbury 27th out of 41 dioceses. Giving as a percentage of income is 2.9% ranking Salisbury 36th out of 41 dioceses. This means of course, that there is huge potential for development and growth. Over the last year, we have invested time and resource to really understand the lay of the land around giving and generosity in the Diocese. From this we are developing a Diocesan Giving Vision and a plan that operationalises Renewing Hope in this area – the new Giving Advisor will be key to shaping this further and bringing it to life. As part of the ongoing review and development of the Diocesan Giving Vision we have convened an Inspiring Giving working group which functions as a sub-committee of the Diocesan Board of Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Salisbury Diocese Clergy Handbook 2021
    DIOCESE OF SALISBURY Clergy Housing Handbook DIOCESE OF SALISBURY The Archdeaconry of WILTSHIRE The Deanery of GUERNSEY including: Alderney, Herm and Sark Calne Marlborough The Deanery of JERSEY Bradford Pewsey Devizes The Archdeaconry of SARUM Stonehenge Heytesbury Salisbury Chalke Alderbury The Archdeaconry Blackmore Vale of SHERBORNE Sherborne Milton and Wimborne Blandford Lyme Bay Dorchester The Archdeaconry Poole of DORSET Purbeck Weymouth and Portland Welcome to the Diocese of Salisbury The Diocese of Salisbury is situated in the south of England encompassing large areas of Dorset, and Wiltshire, a small area of Hampshire and Devon and all of the Channel Islands. It has over 240 Diocesan properties located across this diverse area of rural countryside, beautiful coastlines, and urban towns. The purpose of this handbook is to provide guidance, advice and information to all clergy living in Diocesan property and to set out the roles and responsibilities of clergy and the Property Department. Housing plays a vital part in the happiness and wellbeing of clergy and their families, and the Diocese will endeavour to provide an efficient, friendly and professional service to enable clergy to undertake their ministry and enjoy living in their homes. DIOCESE OF SALISBURY Contents 5 Responsibility and Obligations 5 Diocesan Property Department 6 Contacts 7 A-Z Clergy Property Matters Full index opposite 29 The Role of the PCC 29 During Transitions 31 Letting 31 Utilities 32 Keys 32 Insurance CAle-rgZ y Property Matters 7 Access and Consultation
    [Show full text]
  • The Record 2010 (Pdf)
    Keble College Keble The Record 2010 The Record 2010 The Record 2010 Dame Professor Averil Cameron, Warden (1994–2010) Portrait by Bob Tulloch The Record 2010 Contents The Life of the College Letter from the Warden 5 College’s Farewell to the Warden 10 Sir David Williams 13 Mr Stephen De Rocfort Wall 15 Fellows’ Work in Progress 15 Fellows’ Publications 21 Sports and Games 25 Clubs and Societies 32 The Chapel 34 Financial Review 38 The College at Large Old Members at Work 42 Keble Parishes Update 48 Year Groups 49 Gifts and Bequests 51 Obituaries 63 The Keble Association 87 The London Dinner 88 Keble College 2009–10 The Fellowship 90 Fellowship Elections and Appointments 96 Recognition of Distinction 97 JCR & MCR Elections 97 Undergraduate Scholarships 97 Matriculation 2009–10 99 College Awards and Prizes 104 Academic Distinctions 109 Supplement News of Old Members 2 Forthcoming events: 2010–11 12 Keble College: The Record 2010 4 The Life of the College Letter from the Warden This is my sixteenth and last Letter as Warden, and obviously I write with many kinds of mixed feelings. Having had to move out of the Lodgings at the beginning instead of the end of the summer vacation, in order to allow time for necessary work to be done, I feel as if I am having an unusually prolonged retirement process, but the moment will come when the clock strikes midnight on 30 September and I cease to be Warden and Sir Jonathan Phillips takes over. The past sixteen years have been an extraordinarily rich experience, and I suspect that no one except another head of house really knows the full range of what is entailed.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Version
    Learning from Creative Thinking and Planning for Rural Mission and Growth SUMMARY VERSION Learning from Creative Thinking and Planning for Rural Mission and Growth 2 Learning from Creative Thinking and Planning for Rural Mission and Growth INTRODUCTION Several rural areas in England have developed strategic approaches to mission and growth that are starting to show benefits. This document briefly outlines nine examples of good practice, offering useful ideas and approaches that could be deployed in other rural places. These nine case studies have been drawn together from some of the contributions to a Renewal & Reform seminar on Rural Mission and Growth that took place in February 2018. These studies have been summarised from a much longer document, containing many more useful details, which can be found at www.churchofengland.org/rural Our rural church is showing that with prayer, listening, careful focus on what God is prompting, reflection and action, positive changes can come that will enable more people to come to know God in their lives. Change takes time and patience, there are barriers that need to be overcome, and some things will not work first time or even at all. These nine examples illustrate the diversity of approaches to enabling and developing mission and growth in rural communities. One size does not fit all. It is important to play to the strengths of clergy and congregations. Being strategic is not a bar to the Holy Spirit. All nine case studies reflect a mixed economy approach to parish ministry, with new approaches sitting alongside existing Sunday worship. Strategic Development Fund investment has been important for only two of the initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Porvoo Prayer Diary 2021
    PORVOO PRAYER DIARY 2021 The Porvoo Declaration commits the churches which have signed it ‘to share a common life’ and ‘to pray for and with one another’. An important way of doing this is to pray through the year for the Porvoo churches and their Dioceses. The Prayer Diary is a list of Porvoo Communion Dioceses or churches covering each Sunday of the year, mindful of the many calls upon compilers of intercessions, and the environmental and production costs of printing a more elaborate list. Those using the calendar are invited to choose one day each week on which they will pray for the Porvoo churches. It is hoped that individuals and parishes, cathedrals and religious orders will make use of the Calendar in their own cycle of prayer week by week. In addition to the churches which have approved the Porvoo Declaration, we continue to pray for churches with observer status. Observers attend all the meetings held under the Agreement. The Calendar may be freely copied or emailed for wider circulation. The Prayer Diary is updated once a year. For corrections and updates, please contact Ecumenical Officer, Maria Bergstrand, Ms., Stockholm Diocese, Church of Sweden, E-mail: [email protected] JANUARY 3/1 Church of England: Diocese of London, Bishop Sarah Mullally, Bishop Graham Tomlin, Bishop Pete Broadbent, Bishop Rob Wickham, Bishop Jonathan Baker, Bishop Ric Thorpe, Bishop Joanne Grenfell. Church of Norway: Diocese of Nidaros/ New see and Trondheim, Presiding Bishop Olav Fykse Tveit, Bishop Herborg Oline Finnset 10/1 Evangelical Lutheran Church in Finland: Diocese of Oulu, Bishop Jukka Keskitalo Church of Norway: Diocese of Sør-Hålogaland (Bodø), Bishop Ann-Helen Fjeldstad Jusnes Church of England: Diocese of Coventry, Bishop Christopher Cocksworth, Bishop John Stroyan.
    [Show full text]
  • DIOCESE of SALISBURY Ben 363A Pastoral Secretary To
    DIOCESE OF SALISBURY Ben 363A Pastoral Secretary To: Please see circulation list overleaf 1st August 2006 PASTORAL MEASURE 1983: BENEFICE OF DEVIZES ST JOHN AND ST MARY The interested parties were consulted on 20 April about proposals to make the church of St Mary, Devizes, redundant. Whilst two individual representations were received the enclosed proposals were supported by the great majority of those responding and have been approved by the Bishop and forwarded to the Church Commissioners. A copy of Mr Evans representation to the effect that there is a separate parish of St Mary has been forwarded to the Commissioners, as the Diocesan records of parish boundaries accord with the Commissioners' view that the benefice is a single parish. If the Commissioners prepare a draft scheme or order to give effect to the proposals, an opportunity will be given for the interested parties and others to make representations for or against the draft. If the Commissioners (with the agreement of the Bishop and the Diocesan Pastoral Committee) should amend a draft scheme or order that they have published, the amended draft scheme or order will be circulated as before and the interested parties and others given an opportunity to make representations for or against the revised draft. The Commissioners must consider any representations made to them before they decide whether the scheme or order should proceed, but they can only consider representations after they have published a draft scheme or order based on the proposals. If you wish to have any further information regarding the effect of these proposals or about points of procedure, I shall be pleased to do what I can to help.
    [Show full text]
  • Diocese of Salisbury Statement of Needs [Jun 2021]
    Diocese of Salisbury: Statement of Needs 2021 CREDIT: Max Trafford ‘Love bade me welcome’ CREDIT: Sally Wilson CREDIT: Ash Mills As a Diocese we are committed to the local They capture the hospitable heart of Anglicanism, with courage, vision and holiness to renew its Formed by the union of two ancient sees, All Church traditions find a home here and honouring the Five Guiding Principles, church and its ongoing evolution, with important aspects of which were worked out promise for a beloved place and its people. Sherborne and Ramsbury, the removal of the we encourage service and growth rooted in and to the flourishing of the small new worshipping communities working in here in Salisbury – not only by Herbert, but Diocesan seat from Old Sarum to the new city prayerful attention to God’s call upon every number of parishes with alternative partnership with the parishes that remain our contemporaries John Jewel and Richard Hooker, The Church in this Diocese continues to be of Salisbury some eight hundred years ago is a person. All ministries are valued equally, we episcopal oversight. core. In the church doorway of one of these, who defined our church’s breadth and reach: nurtured by extraordinarily deep roots, with historic precedent for our current readiness to nurture a culture of collaborative working St Andrew’s Bemerton, is etched the words not by its limits, but its centre in Christ. some of the longest continually inhabited places develop and grow. Even the old, eternal rocks at all levels. In this description, we hope to give a “Love bade me welcome” – composed by in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • General Synod of the Church of England 23 and 24 April 2021 Via Zoom
    1 General Synod of the Church of England 23 and 24 April 2021 via Zoom REPORT from the General Synod members from the Diocese of Salisbury We had barely got started with the Introductions before there were changes to the Order of Business, the first of which were tributes to Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh led by the Archbishop of Canterbury, who spoke of the Duke's life of service and his remarkable funeral which the Duke had planned himself. Other members of Synod testified to different aspects of the Duke's life including an excellent tribute to the benefits of his Award scheme. A motion expressing heartfelt sympathy of the Archbishops, Bishops, Clergy and Laity of the General Synod of the Church of England on the death of His Royal Highness Prince Philip, The Duke of Edinburgh, assuring Her Majesty of the honour in which his memory will be held by them and of their prayers for Her Majesty and all the Royal Family’ was overwhelmingly endorsed by the Synod with three abstentions. PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS The Presidential Address was given by the Archbishop of York and took the form of a response to the Panorama programme which had been broadcast four days earlier on the subject ‘Is the church racist? One of those interviewed on the programme was the Revd Arun Arora who had commented that the time of talking about racism had run its course and now action needs to be taken urgently. The Archbishop endorsed this comment, apologised for the Church’s lack of action, and made a commitment to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish' and 'City' -- a Shifting Identity: Salisbury 1440-1600
    Early Theatre 6.1(2003) audrey douglas ‘Parish’ and ‘City’ – A Shifting Identity: Salisbury 1440–1600 The study and documentation of ceremony and ritual, a broad concern of Records of Early English Drama, has stimulated discussion about their purpose and function in an urban context. Briefly, in academic estimation their role is largely positive, both in shaping civic consciousness and in harmonizing diverse classes and interests while – as a convenient corollary – simultaneously con- firming local hierarchies. Profitable self-promotion is also part of this urban picture, since ceremony and entertainment, like seasonal fairs, potentially attracted interest from outside the immediate locality. There are, however, factors that compromise this overall picture of useful urban concord: the dominance of an urban elite, for instance, may effectually be stabilized, promoted, or even disguised by ceremony and ritual; on the other hand, margi- nalized groups (women and the poor) have normally no place in them at all.l Those excluded from participation in civic ritual and ceremonial might, nevertheless, be to some extent accommodated in the pre-Reformation infra- structure of trade guilds and religious guilds. Both organizational groups crossed social and economic boundaries to draw male and female members together in ritual and public expression of a common purpose and brotherhood – signalling again (in customary obit, procession, and feasting) harmony and exclusivity, themes with which, it seems, pre-Reformation urban life was preoccupied. But although women were welcome within guild ranks, office was normally denied them. Fifteenth-century religious guilds also saw a decline in membership drawn from the poorer members of society, with an overall tendency for a dominant guild to become identified with a governing urban elite.2 Less obvious perhaps, but of prime importance to those excluded from any of the above, was the parish church itself, whose round of worship afforded forms of ritual open to all.
    [Show full text]
  • Quakers in the Diocese of Salisbury, 1783
    Quakers in the Diocese of Salisbury, 1783 Extracts from the written answers to the Visitation Queries of Bishop Shute Barrington on his primary visitation N the Salisbury Diocesan Archives (Diocesan Record Office, Wren Hall, The Close, Salisbury. Assistant Diocesan I Archivist: Miss Pamela Stewart) are three volumes of written returns to questions on the state of the church in the parishes of the diocese (the counties of Berkshire and Wilt­ shire), and the following short notes concerning Friends are reproduced here by kind permission of Mr. Alan Barker, the Diocesan Registrar. Shute Barrington (1734-1826), youngest son of the ist Viscount Barrington, was bishop successively of Llandaff (1769), Salisbury (1782), and Durham (1791). The answers of the clergy to the questions asked before his primary visita­ tion in the diocese of Salisbury in 1783 are the only records of this type for the eighteenth century which survive in the Diocesan Archives. The eighth question read as follows: Are there any Presbyterians, Independents, Anabaptists, or Quakers in your Parish, or Chapelry? and how many of each Sect? and of what Rank? Are there any other Places made use of for Divine Worship, than such as are used by the above-mentioned Sects? What are the Names of their Teachers, and are they all licenced as the Law directs? Is their Number greater or less of late Years than formerly, according to your Observation, and by what Means? Are there any Persons in your Parish, who profess to disregard Religion, or who commonly absent themselves from all public Worship of God? A glance through the answers reveals that the clergy were not all equally particular and specific in their answers to this question, so the following notes on Quakers cannot be taken as comprehensive evidence on the extent of Wiltshire Quarterly Meeting in 1783, but they have value as evidence of the Church of England's estimate of Quakerism in the district at that time.
    [Show full text]