Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Tuesday

Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers

Tuesday, November 21, 2017 7:00 PM I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to sta for consideration at a future meeting. V. Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approve Minutes Of November 8, 2017 Work Session and November 8, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting B. Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 11/09/2017 TOTAL: $1,309,570.03 And Per Pre-List Dated 11/16/2017 TOTAL: $1,089,704.81 C. Agreement Between Fire Department and Brycer, LLC D. North Ramp Expansion: Request to Waive Building Permit Fees E. Approve Trac Safety Report of October 4, 2017 F. Accept Interactive Musical Instrument Donation from Rotary Club of Edina VI. Special Recognitions And Presentations A. October Speak Up, Edina: Building Heights B. Progress Report For Braemar Golf Course Improvement Project VII. Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City sta members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the ecient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING: Lake Nancy Lake Association Request for City Coordinated Aquatic Services VIII. Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. 2017 Human Services Task Force Recommendation for 2018/2019 Funding B. Public Engagement Plan For Arden Park C. Edina Chamber of Commerce Request for Modication of Lodging Tax Agreement D. Resolution Nos. 2017-129 and 2017 - 130 Authorizing Issuance and Awarding the Sale of $9,480,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2017C and Awarding the Sale and Providing for the Payment of $1,640,000 General Obligation Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2017D. E. Resolution No. 2017-131: Approving Grants and Donations F. Resolution No. 2017-132: Establishing Extended Parking Hours IX. Correspondence And Petitions A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Minutes: Planning Commission October 11, 2017 2. Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission, Nov. 14, 2017 3. Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission Meeting, September 28, 2017 4. Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission, October 12, 2017 5. Minutes: Human Rights And Relations Commission, October 24, 2017 X. Aviation Noise Update XI. Mayor And Council Comments XII. Manager's Comments

XIII. Schedule of Meetings and Events as of November 21, 2017 XIV. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplication, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: IV.A.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject: Approve Minutes Of November 8, 2017 Work Action Session and November 8, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting

ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes.

INTRODUCTION: The minutes from your last meetings are presented for approval. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Draft November 8, 2017 Work Session Minutes Draft November 8, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Revised Draft Minutes November 8, 2017 Regular Meeting

MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 8, 2017 5:30 P.M.

Mayor Pro Tem Brindle called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.

ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland.

Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte; Communications & Technology Services Director; Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner; Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator; Michael Frey, Art Center General Manager; Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director; MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chante Mitchell, City Management Fellow; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager, Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; and Don Uram, Finance Director.

2018-2019 DRAFT BUDGET WORK PLAN Assistant City Manager Lisa Schaefer reviewed 2018-2019 Budget Goals: 1) Maintain Physical Assets And Infrastructure; 2) Maintain Service Levels That Best Meet The Needs Of The Community; 3) Plan For Connected And Sustainable Development; and 4)Foster Inclusive And Engaged Community. Ms. Schaefer explained how each goal had 2018-2019 Budget Objectives and translated into 2018-2019 Actions assigned to various departments and divisions of the City. Council gave feedback on the goals, objectives and actions.

BOARDS’ & COMMISSIONS’ ANNUAL WORK PLAN MEETING Scott Neal, City Manager reviewed the 2018 Board and Commission Work Plans noting his recommendations for: Arts & Culture Commission, Community Health Commission, Heritage Preservation Commission, Human Rights & Relations Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission, and Transportation Commission. The Council asked questions and gave feedback on the 2018 Work Plans.

QUARTERLY DRAFT BUSINESS REPORT The 2017 Quarter 3 Business Report was presented and included: 1) Updates for the 2016-2017 Vision Edina (Budget) Work Plan, 2) Quarterly Financial Update, and 3) Liquor Scorecard.

ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 21, 2017.

James B. Hovland, Mayor

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 8, 2017 7:00 P.M.

I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland.

III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda as presented. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT Ken Potts, 4236 Crocker Avenue, shared comments about the Comprehensive Plan process, especially regarding the Southdale Area Framework Plan and floor to area ratios and densities.

Richard Donovan, 5804 Brook Drive, shared concerns about on street parking due to the school construction project and number of students parking on the street.

V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS PRESENTED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, approving the consent agenda as follows: V.A. Approve minutes of October 17, 2017, Regular Council meeting V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on pre-list dated October 19, 2017, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $479,851.75, Police Special Revenue $544.31, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $130,012.30, Conservation & Sustainability $300.00, Working Capital Fund $20,099.55, PIR Construction Fund $126,868.29, Art Center Fund $3,575.15, Golf Course Fund $16,674.96, Ice Arena Fund $13,366.06, Sports Dome Fund $125.98, Edinborough Park Fund $8,050.42, Liquor Fund $102,540.46, Utility Fund $345,090.09, Storm Sewer Fund $195,406.72, Recycling Fund $38,181.96, Risk Mgmt ISF $287,265.02, PSTF Agency Fund $1,005.43, MN Task Force 1 Fund $14,295.87, Centennial TIF District $131,599.78, South Dale 2 District $3,204.00, Payroll Fund $10,979.15,: Total $1,929,037.25; Per Credit Card Transactions Dated July 24, 2017 Through August 25, 2017, and Consisting of 16 Pages: General Fund $31,994.71, Police Special Revenue $79.00, Equipment Replacement Fund $4,373.34, Art Center Fund $1,555.50, Aquatic Center Fund $376.40, Golf Course Fund $2,281.41, Ice Arena Fund $3,455.44, Edinborough Park Fund $434.17, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,220.29, Liquor Fund $1,254.34, Utility Fund $958.76, Storm Sewer Fund $1,167.50, PSTF Agency Fund $436.41, MN Task Force 1 Fund $237.13 Total $51,824.40; Per Pre-List Dated October 26, 2017 Consisting of 32 Pages: General Fund $404,057.10, Police Special Revenue $6,667.20, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $21,342.03, Working Capital Fund $32,953.50, PIR Construction Fund $136,076.91, Equipment Replacement Fund $31,643.00, Art Center Fund $2,844.85, Golf Dome Fund $7,178.23, Aquatic Center Fund $231.40, Golf Course Fund $658.44, Ice Arena Fund $4,029.08, Sports Dome Fund $8,685.15, Edinborough Park Fund $11,350.60, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,035.07, Liquor Fund $336,380.38, Utility Fund $829,981.42, Storm Sewer Fund $36,587.06, PSTF Agency Fund $2,952.41, MN Task

Page 1

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Force 1 Fund $17,104.61: Total $1,893,758.44; And Per Pre-List Dated November 2, 2017 Consisting of 32 Pages: General Fund $371,840.16, Police Special Revenue $1,277.52, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $26,757.81, Arts and Culture Fund $3,450.00, Conservation & Sustainability $3,970.48, Working Capital Fund $135,416.84, PIR Construction Fund $194,788.76, Equipment Replacement Fund $610.00, Art Center Fund $353.70, Golf Dome Fund $4,689.88, Aquatic Center Fund $85.33, Golf Course Fund $12,547.15, Ice Arena Fund $12,614.91, Sports Dome Fund $2,654.03, Edinborough Park Fund $19,075.24, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $812.61, Liquor Fund $194,836.07, Utility Fund $224,767.62, Storm Sewer Fund $32,712.04, PSTF Agency Fund $9,151.13, Centennial TIF District $17,105.34, Grandview TIF District $3,399.00, Southdale 2 District $1,905.90, Payroll Fund 8$,012.88: Total $1,282,834.40 V.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2017-124; Authorizing the Issuance of Special Permits for Extended Liquor Sale Hours During Super Bowl 2018 V.D. Adopt Ordinance No. 2017-09 and Resolution No. 2017-109; Final Rezoning, Site Plan Approval and Development Agreement for Trammel Crow at 5150 Eden Avenue V.E. Adopt Resolution Nos. 2017-121 and 2017-127; Providing for the Sale of $9,480,00 G. O. Refunding CIP Bonds Series 2017C and $1,640,000 G.O. Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2017D V.F. Adopt Resolution No. 2017-122; France Avenue Sidewalk Cooperative Agreement V.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2017-123; Setting Public Improvement Hearings for Concord A and G, and West 62 nd Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction V.H. Approve Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements V.I. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Burnsville Toyota, 2017 Toyota Prius, $23,410 V.J. Authorize Second Amendment to Access Agreement for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Install Additional Groundwater Monitoring Wells V.K. Adopt Resolution No. 2017-125; Setting Public Hearing for Lake Nancy Lake Association Request for City Coordinated Aquatic Services V.L. Adopt Resolution No. 2017-128; Removal of Hazardous Conditions Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI.A. MN GREENCORPS MEMBER – INTRODUCED Sustainability Coordinator Brown introduced Mehjabeen Rahman, MN GreenCorps member. She stated Ms. Rahman would serve the City through August 2018 on projects related to the betterment of air quality and greenhouse gas emission reduction related to City operations and transportation.

Mehjabeen Rahman thanked the Council for the opportunity to serve the City and said she would explore greenhouse gas emissions and how the City’s fleet could be optimized while service was ensured. She shared that this was a project of AmeriCorp funded by the federal government and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency with the goal to provide cities with new environmental initiatives.

The Council welcomed Ms. Rahman to the City and the audience offered a round of applause.

Ms. Brown explained the selection process and noted the City was one of 90 applicants for the program.

VI.B. REPORT: TO-GO PACKAGING, PLASTIC BAG, AND RESIDENTIAL WASTE REDUCTION ACTION – SUBMITTED

Page 2

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Ms. Brown introduced members of the Energy and Environment Commission and outlined their initiatives, which included a proposal to ban Styrofoam food packaging materials and plastic bags in Edina and residential waste reduction through organics recycling.

Commissioners Melissa Seeley and Michelle Horan shared their 2017 work plan and reduction goal that focused on organics, which accounted for 25% of materials in the waste stream and their goal to offer curbside recycling in 2019.

The Council commented on compostable requirements and encouraged the Commission to bring forward recommendations with pros and cons so they could act in an informed manner. They noted Minneapolis’s ordinance was strong in outcomes versus product and organics and to-go packaging could be concurrent. Commissioner Horan agreed but noted staffing could be an issue for implementation.

The Council agreed there would be challenges but stressed the need to coordinate haulers to reduce the impacts on streets. Ms. Brown noted Hennepin County’s master plan was to reduce residential waste by 75% by 2030, which would also affect the City’s SCORE funding.

VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VII.A. VARIANCE APPEAL, 5712 WOODLAND LANE, FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION VARIANCE, RESOLUTION NO. 2017-114 – TABLED FOR 45 DAYS Assistant City Planner Presentation Assistant City Planner Aaker said the applicant was requesting a 6.1-foot first floor height variance to allow the construction of a new home with a first floor more than one foot above for 7.1 feet in total for 5712 Woodland Lane. The property was located in the Minnehaha Woods neighborhood and a large part was located in the floodplain. She noted the standards required the basement elevation of a new home to be 2 feet higher than the FEMA base flood elevation and that the Planning Commission approved the variance on a vote of 4-2.

The Council asked questions regarding the sanitary sewer easement and how difficult it would be to relocate. The Council commented on: the buildable area, crossing of the sewer line and driveway location, and confirmed conflicting code requirements regarding floodplain and basements, plus reasons for requiring basements and two-car garages. The Council inquired about run off responsibilities. Ms. Aaker confirmed there would be no redirecting of run-off to other properties and additional fill would not be required.

Andy Porter, Refined Custom Homes, and Jeff Lindgren, Executive Lead, noted the Planning Commission’s support and importance that the proposed home be removed from the floodplain. Mr. Porter outlined the 11-month long process and new home requirements and said the home would pose no water concerns to the other properties. He shared a video presentation of a simulated rain event and the flooding effect and stated the entire home was outside the 862 foot-level. Mr. Porter also shared two recent approvals of similar variance requests in the City and how neighboring properties would have the same issue.

The Council confirmed the garage location and inquired about the amount of fill and other designs to minimize impact. Mr. Porter said the proposed home was a walk-out with no water impact to neighboring properties. He said they reviewed other design options but they did not fit the neighborhood and confirmed the amount of fill displacement had been offset. Mr. Porter said this was a difficult site with regard to water calculations and confirmed no impact to the neighborhood with the exception of a multi-level to a two-story pitched home.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:12 p.m.

Public Testimony Nick Boosalis, 5704 Woodland Lane, addressed the Council.

Page 3

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Tracy Eichorn-Hichs, 5708 Woodland Lane, addressed the Council.

Richard Andron, 4075 West 51 st Street, addressed the Council.

Rick Wyatt, 5631 Woodcrest Drive, addressed the Council.

Katherine Boosalis, 5704 Woodland Lane, addressed the Council.

Heather Beil, 4236 Crocker Avenue, addressed the Council.

Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council.

Ken Potts, 4236 Proctor Avenue, addressed the Council.

Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Steward, Hovland. Motion carried.

The Council inquired about distance between the existing home to the north and other currently non- conforming structures and how much foundation would show on the north side. Mr. Porter said the retaining wall receded approximately half-way or five feet. The Council discussed the size of homes and regulations that could address large-scale homes such as this and how to recognize floodplain and give latitude to address home height.

The Council found there was clearly a hardship but said they had not seen design attempts to alleviate the problem and commented on retaining walls and how the home embraced the creek. The Council noted the distance was relatively close to the neighboring property and the front façade raised was accentuated. The Council supported postponement of the item for 45 days to allow for design alternatives.

Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, tabling Resolution 2017-114 for 45 days to further study the issue for a variance to exceed the one-foot first floor elevation of the previous home at 5712 Woodland Lane. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VII.B. SITE PLAN WITH A PARKING STALL VARIANCE FOR SIMON PROPERTIES TO BUILD A SHAKE SHACK AT SOUTHDALE – REVIEWED, RESOLUTION NO. 2017-115 – ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague said Simon Properties, managing member of Southdale Center, LLC was requesting a site plan review to build a standalone Shake Shack restaurant on the southeast corner of France Avenue and 66th Street at Southdale. He said the site was currently a paved overflow parking for the mall and Macy’s and the proposed restaurant project included a 3,830-square foot interior restaurant area and a 1,286-square foot outdoor patio area. The main entrance to the restaurant would be located on the east side of the proposed building and parking located on the east and south side of the proposed building. He reviewed changes made by the applicant based on issues raised during the sketch plan review, which included moving the building itself back for more green space from France and 960 feet of sidewalk that wrapped the ring road from the France Avenue access through two 66th Street accesses to Drew Avenue to provide for four pedestrian routes from the mall to Shake Shack. Mr. Teague said staff had several discussions with Simon Properties about the concept and vision of this corner and noted LifeTime Fitness would be a parking reduction from the current J.C. Penney which had been factored into the parking study.

Page 4

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

The Council expressed their desire to see something greater at this corner but noted the project met the City’s code.

Applicant Presentation John Phipps, Carmel, Indiana, said they were excited about the iconic Shake Shack brand and were pleased to have enticed them to come to Edina, which created a destination restaurant and creative design.

Cliff Poytner, Simon Properties, said they made significant changes to the original plan and felt the ring road would work as intended.

The Council asked if the mall sign would be removed. Mr. Phipps noted the sign would be relocated farther down France Avenue to a landscaped area. The Council inquired about the west-most entrance on 66 th Avenue and if its closure had been reviewed. Chuck Rickart, WSB, said he did not see that occurring.

The Council asked about the variance and the number of parking stalls. Mr. Rickart said they had reviewed the traffic generation and demand study and determined 300 stalls would be available based on the study.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:46 p.m.

Public Testimony Bill Bednarczyk, 6566 France Avenue South, #1004, addressed the Council.

Howard Kaplan, 6308 Limerick Lane, addressed the Council.

Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Steward, Hovland. Motion carried.

Mr. Phipps referred to other stakeholders on site, reciprocal agreements, limitations on view corridors, and how a hotel would not have been a good fit. He noted Shake Shack would provide visibility and access to France Avenue.

Manager Neal reiterated the City had granted a number of variances to previous developments on the Southdale block and based on parking, it would be difficult to find that this proposal was not appropriate.

Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-115 approving a site plan with variances at 10 Southdale Center to build a 3,800-square foot Shake Shack restaurant, subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped September 25, 2017. • Grading plan date stamped September 25, 2017. • Landscaping plan date stamped September 25, 2017. • Building elevations date stamped September 25, 2017. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Mechanical equipment and trash areas must be screened from all public right-of-way.

Page 5

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District’s requirements. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated October 19, 2017. 7. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. 8. Bike racks must be provided to meet minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. 9. Pedestrian and traffic signage shall be enhanced on the site. Member Fischer seconded the motion.

The Council commented on Simon Properties and its lack of partnership with the City on the hotel result on York Avenue and 66 th Street and the ring road as well as the wall by Restoration Hardware. The Council also commented on the importance of this parcel and Simon’s investments in an aging regional mall. The Council indicated that while they would have liked to see another use, they recognized the limitations. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VII.C. CONSIDER STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION AT MARKET STREET, RESOLUTION NO. 2017-116 – ADOPTED City Engineer Millner said the request was to approve a vacation of street and utility easements contingent on the developer providing street and utility right-of-way on Market Street and dedication of utility easements for private utilities across the south parcel to adjacent private properties for Edina Market Street LLC.

The Council confirmed all exterior lot lines would remain the same and that the action was combining lots.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:13 p.m.

Public Testimony No one appeared.

Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Steward, Hovland. Motion carried.

Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-116 vacating street and utility easement at Market Street. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VII.D. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MARKET STREET, RESOLUTION NO. 2017-125 – ADOPTED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf stated the City of Edina and Edina Market Street LLC were requesting to combine and plat the properties that up the Edina Market Street Project located on both the north and south side of Market Street, formerly known as 49-1/2 Street. He said the purpose was to combine all the parcels within the development to have clear legal descriptions, no changes were proposed to the approved development plan, and no new lot was being created. He said the proposed subdivision met the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision and resulting uses met all zoning ordinance requirements.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:33 p.m.

Public Testimony

Page 6

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

No one appeared.

Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Steward, Hovland. Motion carried.

Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-125 approving a preliminary plat for Market Street. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VII.E. ORDINANCE NO. 2017-12 AMENDING CHAPTERS 24 AND 36 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE REGARDING SMALL CELL FACILITIES IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY – ADOPTED Facility Manager Presentation Facility Manager Barnes reviewed the City’s zoning and regulation for communication towers, antennas, and base units contained in Chapter 24 of the City code and said the original regulations were drafted at a time when antennas were bulky and bolted to the tops of guyed or lattice towers. He explained that in 2015, the Federal Communications Commission enhanced their rules regarding the transmission of 911 calls and the push began for more reliable accurate location information which produced the need for small cell sites within the telecommunications industry to supply that need.

The Council commented on the inclusion of ground-centered. Mr. Barnes said some included a transformer ground-mounted while the rest were on light poles. He said the new legislation opened up rights-of-way and staff would have to work through City review to accommodate the likely many requests as these were more data-driven and based on demand and were co-locatable.

Public Works Director Olson commented on the close proximity and noted State law prohibited cities from minimum site distance with more than one user. He noted this action would keep the City in compliance and while it was a public safety benefit to have a large network, cities do not have as much control as before.

The Council asked if previous agreements would be null and void. Mr. Neal said the action would nullify cost structure but that element was not contractual and staff hoped the vendors would not walk away from the agreements. Mr. Olson said there were currently seven antennas in place so the City had some leverage and could require annual registration. He noted there was some recourse language in place in Statute.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:37 p.m.

Public Testimony No one appeared.

Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Steward, Hovland. Motion carried.

Member Staunton made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2017-12 amending Sections 2-724, 24-49, 24-50, 24-51, 24-53, 24-56, 24-58, 24- 61, 34-20, 34-46, 36-10 and adding section 36-403 of the Edina City Code concerning small wireless facilities and wireless support structures in the public right-of-way. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

Page 7

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

VII.F. NORMANDALE PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-446, RESOLUTION NO. 2017-117 – ADOPTED Assistant City Engineer Schulze reviewed the project which involved reconstruction of local bituminous streets, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost was $3,350,420. The estimated roadway construction cost was $1,320,420 and would be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $14,920 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $2,030,000 and would be funded through the City’s utility funds. Mr. Schulze reviewed the streets which included Creek Drive, Doron Drive, Doron Lane, Limerick Drive, Limerick Lane, and Valley View Road and said the project was feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the infrastructure.

Mr. Millner noted contingencies had been built in with the hope that contractors were looking for work.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 11:03 p.m.

Public Testimony Diane Kaplan, 6308 Limerick Lane, addressed the Council.

Michael Bromer 6521 Creek Drive, addressed the Council.

Howard Kaplan, 6308 Limerick Lane, addressed the Council.

Keith Carlson, 6528 Creek Drive, addressed the Council.

Jim Moe, 6519 Creek Drive, addressed the Council.

Richard Hansen, 6304 Doran Lane, addressed the Council.

Eric Vercauteren, 6300 Doran Lane, addressed the Council.

Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Steward, Hovland. Motion carried.

The Council responded to concerns raised during the public hearing about the need for replacement. Mr. Schulze commented on Wyman Bridge, how the sidewalk narrowed to 24 feet with the boulevard and buffer between pedestrians and cars, and how street widths allowed enough room for emergency vehicles. He said there had been no increased data of accidents, parking was allowed on both sides of Creek Drive, and pet containment and driveways aprons were included in the contract price.

The Council inquired about parking impacts on Creek Drive and the potential for bump-outs Mr. Schulze suggested parking on Valley Lane or access on Heights Park too. The Council commented on the possibility of street canting on Limerick Drive for water drainage and asked about water main breaks. Mr. Schulz said the water flowed from south to north to the creek and had multiple storm sewers.

The Council referred to the Living Streets Policy, research regarding widths, and what other communities do. Mr. Milner outlined the three metrics used: traffic volume; traffic speed; and, accidents and said there had been very few accidents on these local streets and volumes had not changed since the cul-de-sac was built. The Council commented on the challenge and costliness of the City’s infrastructure and how to be fair and equitable.

Page 8

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-117 ordering improvement for Normandale Park D Neighborhood roadway reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-446. Member Stewart seconded the motion.

The Council commented regarding uneven turf restoration results and suggested to separately bid these projects. The Council said it was a tough reality but some were 50 years old and necessary. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VII.G. COUNTRY CLUB C NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-448, RESOLUTION NO. 2017-118 – ADOPTED Mr. Schulze said the project involved reconstruction of Edina Court, select replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer and watermain systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost was $140,530. The estimated roadway construction cost was $71,690 and would be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $10,481 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $68,840 and would be funded through the City’s utility funds.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 12:08 a.m.

Public Testimony No one appeared.

Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Steward, Hovland. Motion carried.

The Council asked about street size adjustments. Mr. Schulze explained the rating was based on trip generation instead of front footage.

Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-118 ordering improvement for Country Club C Neighborhood roadway reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-448. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VII.H. BREDESEN PARK A NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-450, RESOLUTION NO. 2017-119 – ADOPTED Mr. Schulze reviewed the project which involved reconstruction of local bituminous streets, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood for Habitat Court and Waterford Court north of Lincoln Drive. The estimated total project cost was $206,010. The estimated roadway construction cost was $122,720 and would be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $5,900 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $83,290 and would be funded through the City’s utility funds.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 12:12 a.m.

Public Testimony No one appeared.

Page 9

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Steward, Hovland. Motion carried.

Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-119 ordering improvement for Bredesen Park A Neighborhood roadway reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-450. Member Staunton seconded the motion.

The Council commented on the difference between the Country Club C assessments versus this assessment. Mr. Schulze said this assessment was double the density at six 6 REUs. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VII.I. BREDESEN PARK E NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-499, RESOLUTION NO. 2017-120 – TABLED TO DECEMBER 5, 2017 Mr. Schulze reviewed the reconstruction project of bituminous streets, installation of a bituminous trail, select replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the Bredesen Park E Neighborhood. The estimated total project cost was $669,140. The estimated roadway construction cost was $446,930 and would be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $1,145 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $193,480 and would be funded through the City’s utility funds. Bike and pedestrian improvements were estimated to cost $28,730 and would be funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclists Safety (PACS) fund. The Bredesen Park E project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan.

The Council commented on mixing commercial and residential REUs based on traffic generation and that no useable property was assessed to the City. The Council inquired about communication efforts in the commercial areas. Mr. Schulze outlined the notification process for assessment projects, the open houses held, and the certified mailings for the public hearing as per Statute.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 12:24 a.m.

Public Testimony Stuart Alger, attorney for two commercial property owners, Edina Business Center 5500 Lincoln Drive, Edina Commons, 5624 Lincoln Drive, addressed the Council.

Devin Doyle, 1350 Interlochen Parkway, Waconia, 5624 Lincoln Drive, addressed the Council.

Larry Cramer, Edina Business Center, addressed the Council.

Dave Dahl, 320 Edgewood Avenue North, Golden Valley, 5700 and 5720 Lincoln Drive, addressed the Council.

Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Steward, Hovland. Motion carried.

The Council responded to comments made in the public hearing regarding a short-term mill overlay versus full reconstruction. Mr. Schulze said that would provide a ten year-solution and would not include utilities or pedestrian features. Staff recommended the project be done now because of economies of scale and

Page 10

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

current pricing. The Council commented on parking during construction and the possibility of a turning movement study at Dovre.

Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, tabling Resolution No. 2017- 120 ordering improvement for Bredesen Park E Neighborhood roadway reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-499 to December 5, 2017.

The Council requested data on turning radiuses and issues regarding no benefit to specific properties. Mr. Neal suggested property owners forward questions to staff to better facilitate response on December 5. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS – (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted).

VIII.A. MARKET STREET: REVISED ELEVATIONS TO THE PARKING RAMP – REVIEWED Mr. Teague explained the proposed parking ramp project and introduced the development team, Buhl Investors and Saturday Properties, who were proposing changes to the building elevations for the parking ramp north of Market Street and the proposed new building south of Market Street. He said the most dramatic changes were those proposed on the parking ramp due to fire/sprinkler requirements. The proposed structures would still meet the City's building materials requirements.

Todd Novak and Todd Mohagen, Mohegan Hansen Architects, reviewed the revised elevations and provided a video presentation of the project. They noted the requirement for 100% opaque and how the green screen had been moved to cover concrete sections open for air ventilation on the north side of project. Mr. Novak reviewed the new louver system and explained the applicants had switched mechanical systems to a split system. He noted the surface metal fasteners were concealed and the elevator overrun was accented with a chimney feature. He reviewed additional stonework, canopy, brick material, and the balcony change to a cantilever due to lack of tie rods needed.

The Council commented on the benefits of post-tension construction and sustainability and inquired about access to public parking and the potential for cars queuing. Mr. Novak referred to proposed sensors on approach, noting the door could be left open longer during certain parts of the year. The Council commented on landscaping, flowers, planters, and horizontal wood-look louvers and the warranty of the louvers. Mr. Mohagen assured the Council the product was one of the better ones and should retain its color for 20-30 years.

Mr. Novak referred to the expanded width of the woonerf and the colonnade that showed more prominence for retail. He outlined expanded outdoor balconies and explained how the dog park was relocated to second floor. The Council suggested expanding the water feature for enhanced sound and visual quality for the plaza area and complimented the applicants on the improved design elements.

Mr. Novak reviewed the revised elevations, color and dimensional differences. The Council requested that traffic needs and flows with Walgreen’s and Bespoke be considered if possible.

Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, adopting the Market Street revised parking ramp elevations. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VIII.B. UPDATED POLICY: 50 TH AND FRANCE EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMITS 2018-19 – ADOPTED

Page 11

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Mr. Neuendorf stated each year, the City issues approximately 650 parking permits that allow employees at 50th and France to park in the South, Center, and North Parking Ramps. With the anticipated reconstruction and expansion of the Center and North Parking Ramps, changes to the policy were necessary to ensure that the needs of customers and employees were reasonably satisfied during the construction phase of January 1 to September 2018. While this construction schedule could be disruptive, it was selected based on extensive input from the business community at 50th and France in spring 2017 and reduced the timeframe from 30 months to 21 months with only one holiday season affected. Mr. Neudendorf outlined the proposed parking strategies which included parking at Mercy Covenant Church, changes on France Avenue north of 48 th , and another church to be named.

Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by member Staunton, adopting the updated policy for 50 th and France employee parking permits 2018-2019.

The Council confirmed this proposed policy was accepted by the merchants and that construction parking would not be allowed in ramps or City lots. Mr. Neuendorf said staff would work to offer temporary licenses to the developer to park on the former Public Works site and the north ramp would be responsible for its own parking. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VIII.C. RESOLUTION 2017-107 ADOPTED – ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS – ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations.

Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-107 accepting various grants and donations. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence.

IX.B. MINUTES 1. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 2. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 26 AND OCTOBER 3, 2017 3. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 28, 2017 4. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 14, 2017 Informational; no action required.

X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received

XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received

XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received

XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF NOVEMBER 8, 2017 – Received

XIV. ADJOURNMENT

Page 12

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 1:39 a.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 21, 2017.

James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the November 8, 2017, meeting available.

Page 13

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 8, 2017 7:00 P.M.

I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland.

III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda as presented. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

Richard Donovan, 5804 Brook Drive, shared concerns about on street parking due to the school construction project and number of students parking on the street.

Page 1

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

The Council welcomed Ms. Rahman to the City and the audience offered a round of applause.

Ms. Brown explained the selection process and noted the City was one of 90 applicants for the program.

VI.B. REPORT: TO-GO PACKAGING, PLASTIC BAG, AND RESIDENTIAL WASTE REDUCTION ACTION – SUBMITTED

Page 2

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:12 p.m.

Public Testimony Nick Boosalis, 5704 Woodland Lane, addressed the Council.

Page 3

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Tracy Eichorn-Hichs, 5708 Woodland Lane, addressed the Council.

Richard Andron, 4075 West 51 st Street, addressed the Council.

Rick Wyatt, 5631 Woodcrest Drive, addressed the Council.

Katherine Boosalis, 5704 Woodland Lane, addressed the Council.

Heather Beil, 4236 Crocker Avenue, addressed the Council.

Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council.

Ken Potts, 4236 Proctor Avenue, addressed the Council.

Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland. Motion carried.

Page 4

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

The Council expressed their desire to see something greater at this corner but noted the project met the City’s code.

Cliff Poytner, Simon Properties, said they made significant changes to the original plan and felt the ring road would work as intended.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:46 p.m.

Public Testimony Bill Bednarczyk, 6566 France Avenue South, #1004, addressed the Council.

Howard Kaplan, 6308 Limerick Lane, addressed the Council.

Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland. Motion carried.

Page 5

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

The Council confirmed all exterior lot lines would remain the same and that the action was combining lots.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:13 p.m.

Public Testimony No one appeared.

Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland. Motion carried.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:33 p.m.

Public Testimony

Page 6

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

No one appeared.

Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland. Motion carried.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:37 p.m.

Public Testimony No one appeared.

Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland. Motion carried.

Page 7

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Mr. Millner noted contingencies had been built in with the hope that contractors were looking for work.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 11:03 p.m.

Public Testimony Diane Kaplan, 6308 Limerick Lane, addressed the Council.

Michael Bromer 6521 Creek Drive, addressed the Council.

Howard Kaplan, 6308 Limerick Lane, addressed the Council.

Keith Carlson, 6528 Creek Drive, addressed the Council.

Jim Moe, 6519 Creek Drive, addressed the Council.

Richard Hansen, 6304 Doran Lane, addressed the Council.

Eric Vercauteren, 6300 Doran Lane, addressed the Council.

Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland. Motion carried.

Page 8

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 12:08 a.m.

Public Testimony No one appeared.

Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland. Motion carried.

The Council asked about street size adjustments. Mr. Schulze explained the rating was based on trip generation instead of front footage.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 12:12 a.m.

Public Testimony No one appeared.

Page 9

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland. Motion carried.

Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 12:24 a.m.

Public Testimony Stuart Alger, attorney for two commercial property owners, Edina Business Center 5500 Lincoln Drive, Edina Commons, 5624 Lincoln Drive, addressed the Council.

Devin Doyle, 1350 Interlochen Parkway, Waconia, 5624 Lincoln Drive, addressed the Council.

Larry Cramer, Edina Business Center, addressed the Council.

Dave Dahl, 320 Edgewood Avenue North, Golden Valley, 5700 and 5720 Lincoln Drive, addressed the Council.

Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland. Motion carried.

Page 10

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

current pricing. The Council commented on parking during construction and the possibility of a turning movement study at Dovre.

VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS – (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted).

Mr. Novak reviewed the revised elevations, color and dimensional differences. The Council requested that traffic needs and flows with Walgreen’s and Bespoke be considered if possible.

Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, adopting the Market Street revised parking ramp elevations. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried.

VIII.B. UPDATED POLICY: 50 TH AND FRANCE EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMITS 2018-19 – ADOPTED

Page 11

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by member Staunton, adopting the updated policy for 50 th and France employee parking permits 2018-2019.

IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence.

X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received

XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received

XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received

XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF NOVEMBER 8, 2017 – Received

XIV. ADJOURNMENT

Page 12

Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2017

There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 1:39 a.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 21, 2017.

James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the November 8, 2017, meeting available.

Page 13

CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: IV.B.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From: Don Uram, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject: Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated Action 11/09/2017 TOTAL: $1,309,570.03 And Per Pre-List Dated 11/16/2017 TOTAL: $1,089,704.81

ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment.

INTRODUCTION: Claims list is attached. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Claims Pre-List Dated 11/09/2017 TOTAL: $1,309,570.03 Claims Pre-List Dated 11/16/2017 TOTAL: $1,089,704.81 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5654 11/9/2017 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 73.60 445576 2178115 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 68.99 445534 2178119 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 142.59

5655 11/9/2017 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 117.54 FIRE EXTINGUISHER MONTHLY INSP 445599 158032 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 37.86 FIRE EXTINGUISHER HOOKS 445597 158127 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 155.40

5656 11/9/2017 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 247.65 445536 61386800 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 330.20 445586 61387000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,988.69 445573 61428800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,205.00 445605 61429000 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 265.25 445535 96697500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,036.79

5657 11/9/2017 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 695.00 MAIN AND HORNETS DOOR REPAIR 445600 35742 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 695.00

5658 11/9/2017 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 212.14 445434 133726 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 150.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 445648 133764 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 362.26

5659 11/9/2017 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 157.96 LONG STROKE 445492 1187617 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 190.14 BRAKE CHAMBERS 445491 1187691 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 104.47 ADJUSTER 445490 1187706 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 190.14 BRAKE CHAMBER 445696 1188311 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.74 FILTER ASSY 445695 1188331 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 688.45

5660 11/9/2017 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,001.25 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 445408 B109896 07136.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Oaklawn Ave 1,001.25

5661 11/9/2017 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 647.00 FILTERS 445419 519268 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5661 11/9/2017 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD Continued... 647.00

5662 11/9/2017 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 1,554.00 50TH AND FRANCE CLEANING 445788 7070243975 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,450.00 CITY HALL CLEANING SERVICE 445787 7070244232 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 4,004.00

5663 11/9/2017 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 35.25 PA TEST NOTICE PUBLICATION 445623 541914 1180.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ELECTION 164.50 PUBLISH ORD 2017-11 445624 541915 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 76.38 PUBLISH ORD 2017-10 445625 541916 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 146.88 PUBLISH ORD 2017-06 445626 541917 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 117.50 PUBLISH ORD 2017-13 445621 541918 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 164.50 PUBLISH MARKET VACATION NOTICE 445622 541919 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 705.01

5664 11/9/2017 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 445617 2475040 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00

5665 11/9/2017 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 2,014.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 445598 16467 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 2,014.00

5666 11/9/2017 132938 HOT DISH ADVERTISING LLC 9,000.00 MARKETING PLAN. PROF. SERV. 445680 23600 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 9,000.00

5667 11/9/2017 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 5.54 445591 1101763 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 5.54

5668 11/9/2017 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 51.50 445590 125059 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 51.50

5669 11/9/2017 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 69.99 OPTICAL DRIVE - MICRO CENTER 445484 045-WP-6829893 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 227.44 AMAZON - BATTERY BACKUP 445798 111-7862838-636 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5037 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5669 11/9/2017 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID Continued... 297.43

5670 11/9/2017 101483 MENARDS 35.75 ORGANIZE MAT FOR NS VEHICLE 445689 054788 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 23.10 METAL SHELVING STRAP 445633 54595 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 9.98 HEAT LOOP REPAIR 445688 54800 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 12.99 EXTERIOR LIGHTING REPAIR 445687 54808 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 81.82

5671 11/9/2017 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 277.44 STEEL 445705 391723 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 277.44

5672 11/9/2017 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 1,735.86 AP FLOOR MIX, TIES, FOAM 445802 2852 5720.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,735.86

5673 11/9/2017 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 3,429.00 SOUTH PAINTING 445595 0063491-IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 2,046.00 BACK YARD PAINTING 445596 0063492-IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 5,475.00

5674 11/9/2017 104672 SPRINT 16.86 445652 873184124-10/17 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.86 445652 873184124-10/17 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 17.67 445652 873184124-10/17 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 50.58 445652 873184124-10/17 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 51.57 445652 873184124-10/17 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 101.16 445652 873184124-10/17 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 128.91 445652 873184124-10/17 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 16.86 445652 873184124-10/17 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 78.33 445652 873184124-10/17 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 478.80

5675 11/9/2017 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 213.75 ASTRON 445743 101734-R 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 213.75

5676 11/9/2017 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 124.60 PULLEY, BELT 445771 0143742 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5676 11/9/2017 118190 TURFWERKS LLC Continued... 124.60

5677 11/9/2017 119454 VINOCOPIA

705.00 445574 0192558 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 420.50 445606 192572 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,125.50

5678 11/9/2017 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION

543.08 445808 50125444 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 543.08

5679 11/9/2017 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE

128.00 445463 52655 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,504.30 445459 52955 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 865.20 445562 52976 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,497.50

419396 11/9/2017 104878 AA EQUIPMENT COMPANY

319.78 445738 10470 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 319.79 445738 10470 5861.6530 REPAIR PARTS VERNON OCCUPANCY 639.58 445738 10470 5821.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,279.15

419397 11/9/2017 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 1,300.00 445547 E-4300 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,300.00

419398 11/9/2017 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC.

380.36 GAS VALVE, PIPE 445773 616274 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 380.36

419399 11/9/2017 132835 ADCOCK, MARIAN

12.32 ARTWORK SOLD 445779 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 12.32

419400 11/9/2017 132360 AMERICAN LIBERTY CONSTRUCTION INC.

32,246.84 445806 THREE-10/17 05569.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Well #9 Building and Rehab 32,246.84

419401 11/9/2017 101479 AMERICAN SERVICES CORP. CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419401 11/9/2017 101479 AMERICAN SERVICES CORP. Continued... 74.76 445739 5968 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 74.76

419402 11/9/2017 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 156.02 445728 1003947863 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 140.10 445735 1003950300 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 215.53 445679 1003955335 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 193.29 LAUNDRY 445801 1003958724 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 704.94

419403 11/9/2017 141414 AMF SOUTHTOWN 50.00 BOWLING ALLEY PAYMENT 445587 828957 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 50.00

419404 11/9/2017 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN 317.00 UNIFORM PANTS 445475 110117SA 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 317.00

419405 11/9/2017 135278 ANNMADE INC. 13.00 ARTWORK SOLD 445778 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00

419406 11/9/2017 119976 AP LAWN 245.00 LAWN SERVICE 445804 EDPARK-1017 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 245.00

419407 11/9/2017 135988 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS 908.60 OCT APPRIZE INVOICE 445700 15180 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 908.60

419408 11/9/2017 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,392.00 445609 3216329 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 640.00 445446 3218076 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,280.00 445549 3218077 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 640.00 445564 3218078 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,325.45 445537 3219148 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,897.95 445760 3219149 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,720.25 445528 3219150 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 13,895.65 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419409 11/9/2017 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS Continued... 284.17 RUBBISH REMOVAL 445631 1-146354110117 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 284.17

419410 11/9/2017 136687 BALLANTINE PAINTING 1,250.00 CITY HALL GARAGE DOOR PAINT 445786 1011 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,250.00

419411 11/9/2017 141486 BELMONT HOME RESTORATION 20.00 APP REIMBURSMENT 445304 159334 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 20.00

419412 11/9/2017 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 885.00 LAWN CARE 445639 149184 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 885.00

419413 11/9/2017 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 936.00 PIZZA 445673 4694524 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 936.00

419414 11/9/2017 125139 BERNICK'S 1,521.90 445545 389871 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 296.05 445569 389873 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 670.40 445458 389967 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 444.00 445770 390424 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,932.35

419415 11/9/2017 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 132.95 COFFEE 445647 506140 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 318.15 445417 506260 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 451.10

419416 11/9/2017 130069 BFG SUPPLY COMPANY 295.67 BULBS 445410 857254-00 5765.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS PROMENADE EXPENSES 295.67

419417 11/9/2017 140365 BIKO ASSOCIATES INC. 11,104.50 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 445406 8-10/17 4428.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comprehensive Plan 2018 11,104.50

419418 11/9/2017 141497 BISHOP, STEVE CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419418 11/9/2017 141497 BISHOP, STEVE Continued... 53.76 PERMIT REFUND 445613 110117 4090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 53.76

419419 11/9/2017 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 12,000.00 445593 11296 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 12,000.00

419420 11/9/2017 120510 BLOOMINGTON CUSTOM EMBROIDERY 550.40 EXPLORER UNIFORMS 445754 40075 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 550.40

419421 11/9/2017 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 315.98 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 445488 62167371 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 977.01 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 445489 82671249 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,292.99

419422 11/9/2017 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 713.00 445575 146049 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 713.00

419423 11/9/2017 100662 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 75.00 445504 9795 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP 75.00

419424 11/9/2017 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 21,505.22 445424 1080705709 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 13,458.36 445425 1080705712 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 73.15 445765 1080712277 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,478.69 445764 1080712278 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 441.29 445766 1080712279 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,904.23 445451 1080712280 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 118.30 445450 1080712281 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,085.55 445449 1080712282 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 60.93 445448 1080712283 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 41,125.72

419425 11/9/2017 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 222.50 445584 1090780087 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,344.00 445585 1090780088 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,512.00 445544 1090780651 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419425 11/9/2017 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC Continued... 149.00 445554 1090782005 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,127.30 445557 1090782526 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 129.45 445555 1090782527 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,354.45 445462 1090782528 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 13,838.70

419426 11/9/2017 101752 BRISCOE, ROBERT

16.25 ARTWORK SOLD 445791 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.25

419427 11/9/2017 136782 C&C COURTS INC.

450.00 FUTSAL COURT REMOVAL 445411 2017-898 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 450.00

419428 11/9/2017 100826 CANTON, JANET

78.94 MILEAGE FOR 2017 445604 110217 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 78.94

419429 11/9/2017 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES

204.50 445709 2023396 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,375.65 445709 2023396 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,305.65 445453 2023402 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 26.40 445548 2023494 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,299.70 445548 2023494 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,211.90

419430 11/9/2017 134978 CATHERWOOD, JILL

26.00 ARTWORK SOLD 445792 10717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00

419431 11/9/2017 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO.

681.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 445632 C1849154 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 681.00

419432 11/9/2017 105497 CENTRAL ROOFING CO. 6,750.00 ROOF REPAIR - CONTR REPAIRS 445473 110317 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 6,750.00

419433 11/9/2017 123898 CENTURYLINK 129.57 952 831-0024 445378 0024-10/17 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419433 11/9/2017 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 57.99 952 929-0297 445377 0297-10/17 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 444.40 952 927-8861 445376 8861-10/17 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 631.96

419434 11/9/2017 132519 CHIP JONES PHOTOGRAPHY 325.00 445646 214 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 325.00

419435 11/9/2017 139668 CITY HOMES LLC 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 445305 ED151821 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00

419436 11/9/2017 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 12,570.00 445422 14840 1492.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PH EMERGENCY PREPARDNESS 12,570.00

419437 11/9/2017 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 PHONE, INTRANET 445796 COM-1324 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 100.00

419438 11/9/2017 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 98.23 445455 112920000-9/17 5841.6189 SEWER & WATER YORK OCCUPANCY 98.23

419439 11/9/2017 105194 CITY OF RICHFIELD 120.00 BOWLING TSHIRTS 445588 BOWLING SHIRTS 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 120.00

419440 11/9/2017 114639 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 165.00 11/16/17 NATURALIST VISIT 445602 111617 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 165.00

419441 11/9/2017 141508 COBB, KATHY 811.00 REV RECAPTURE REFUND 445589 11032017 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 811.00

419442 11/9/2017 120433 COMCAST 105.18 CABLE 445740 177449-10/17 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 105.18 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419443 11/9/2017 120433 COMCAST Continued... 20.35 CABLE TV 445812 161120-10/17 5511.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 20.35

419444 11/9/2017 124118 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES 269.90 CONTRACTED REPAIR 445704 26873 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 269.90

419445 11/9/2017 140999 CORE-MARK MIDCONTINENT INC. 949.95 445809 6126992 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 949.95

419446 11/9/2017 137086 CRAFTSMEN HOME IMPROVEMENT 404.84 REFUND 80% - JOB CANCELLED 445751 157337 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 404.84

419447 11/9/2017 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 20.33 WATER 445741 114X63719906 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 33.24 WATER 445637 855685-4112017 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 53.57

419448 11/9/2017 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE 2.60 ARTWORK SOLD 445793 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.60

419449 11/9/2017 101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 1,666.51 GENEROTOR REPAIR 445703 100-8183 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,666.51

419450 11/9/2017 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 1,344.00 NOVEMBER/DECEMBER NEWSLETTER 445326 312787 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 1,344.00

419451 11/9/2017 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 1,030.00 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 445630 3158777 7412.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PSTF RANGE 1,780.00 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 445629 3158871 7412.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PSTF RANGE 2,810.00

419452 11/9/2017 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 10.40 ARTWORK SOLD 445794 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 10.40 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419452 11/9/2017 103176 DANICIC, JOHN Continued...

419453 11/9/2017 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 9,052.60 OCT SURCHARGE 445752 102017 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 9,052.60

419454 11/9/2017 103013 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 40.00 GC AND DOME BUYERS CARDS 445742 2018 APPL 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 40.00

419455 11/9/2017 135280 DEPEW, TERRY & CHARLOTTE 2.11 ARTWORK SOLD 445813 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.11

419456 11/9/2017 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 8,439.21 REFUSE 445651 DT0001953399 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 1,235.65 REFUSE 445654 DT0001982544 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 9,674.86

419457 11/9/2017 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 12.35 ARTWORK SOLD 445814 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 12.35

419458 11/9/2017 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 1,666.00 445640 827001826-17 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,666.00

419459 11/9/2017 102454 DRISTE, BRIAN 236.95 GLOVES HATS JEANS 445481 103117 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 236.95

419460 11/9/2017 141492 ELOFSON, JESSICA 76.69 REFUND 445315 78860 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 76.69

419461 11/9/2017 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 57.70 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 445436 1933998 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 62.25 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 445437 1933999 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.65 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 445438 1934075 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 190.95 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 445439 1934126 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 361.55 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419461 11/9/2017 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. Continued...

419462 11/9/2017 137587 EMMER, JILL

6.44 ARTWORK SOLD 445815 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.44

419463 11/9/2017 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER

419.00 LESSONS 10/19-11/1 445506 11217 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 419.00

419464 11/9/2017 130136 FAUS, SUSAN

128.40 MILEAGE 445519 110217 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 128.40

419465 11/9/2017 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS

521.51 METER FLANGE KIT FOR RESALE 445683 0266708 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 521.51

419466 11/9/2017 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING

1,250.00 RAMPO WINDOW CLEANING 445790 2315-23091 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,250.00

419467 11/9/2017 102727 FORCE AMERICA

1,037.50 SPINNER MOTORS 445784 IN001-1190874 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.33 GAUGE 445774 IN001-1190916 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,067.83

419468 11/9/2017 136205 FREEMAN, BRANDON

401.53 MILEAGE/PER DIEM REIMBURSEMENT 445471 10312017A 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 401.53

419469 11/9/2017 100764 G & K SERVICES

36.26 LAUNDRY 445413 600674961 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 48.51 RENTAL UNIFORM 445412 6006749669 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 19.73 RENTAL UNIFORMS 445414 6006749671 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 14.46 RENTAL UNIFORMS 445415 6006749672 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.74 RENTAL UNIFORM 445416 6006749673 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.51 RENTAL UNIFORM 445818 6006760773 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 36.26 LAUNDRY 445819 6006760774 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 245.47 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419470 11/9/2017 102456 GALLS INC. Continued... 139.50 GALLS - BADGE 445400 BC0486461 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 365.71 UNIFORMS 445498 BC0491663 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 161.49 UNIFORM EQUIPMENT 445496 BC0494472 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 831.60 BALLISTIC VEST 445495 BC0496954 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 366.00 UNIFORMS 445497 BC0497219 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 49.99 UNIFORM EQUIPMENT 445399 BC0497473 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,263.78 EXPLORER UNIFORMS 445782 OR9163407 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 3,178.07

419471 11/9/2017 141488 GARBE, BENJAMIN 112.01 REFUND 445311 123558 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 112.01

419472 11/9/2017 141082 GASTERLAND, HANS 250.00 11/19/17 PERFORMANCE 445518 111917 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 250.00

419473 11/9/2017 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 1,275.10 SOFTBALL BASES 445418 93232 5552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 1,275.10

419474 11/9/2017 141336 GEOGRAPHIC INDUSTRIES INC. 39,660.28 PAY APP. 2 445423 APPL 2 47093.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK SIGNAGE IMPRVMNT PROJECT 39,660.28

419475 11/9/2017 103185 GERTENS 353.00 NEW TREE 445472 428461/1 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 353.00

419476 11/9/2017 124471 GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC. 12,500.00 PAVEMENT CONDITION 445407 3735 1261.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 12,500.00

419477 11/9/2017 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 1,483.65 445641 7100340 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,483.65

419478 11/9/2017 133258 GORDON, KIM 2.28 ARTWORK SOLD 445816 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.28 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419478 11/9/2017 133258 GORDON, KIM Continued...

419479 11/9/2017 129585 GOSSARD, TRAVIS 119.98 UNIFORM BIBS HAT 445468 103117TG 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 119.98

419480 11/9/2017 101103 GRAINGER 92.68 FILTERS 445487 9600390257 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 53.30 FILTERS 445486 9600390265 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 22.98 FILTERS 445485 9600853486 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 52.28 HITCH PINS 445499 9601292270 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.48 CONNECTOR WIRE CABLE 445501 9601447361 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.79 SAFETY GLASSES 445500 9602300775 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 17.87 CONNECTOR WIRE, BRUSHES 445431 9603269821 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 259.96 GLOVES AND BATTERIES 445803 9604115684 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 135.71 FAUCET 445775 9604726910 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 663.05

419481 11/9/2017 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,854.50 445441 MN00029737 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 402.25 445558 MN00029738 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 2,256.75

419482 11/9/2017 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 868.10 SPLICE KITS 445745 9300658522 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 456.60- SLPICE KITS 445664 9300791306 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 411.50

419483 11/9/2017 131517 GREAT LAKES WEATHER SERVICE LLC 1,410.00 445807 111706 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,410.00

419484 11/9/2017 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 360.00 LESSONS 10/19-11/1 445505 11217 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 360.00

419485 11/9/2017 141485 GRIFFITH, RICHARD 1,757.50 CITY PORTION OF CONCRETE WORK 445508 10122017 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,757.50

419486 11/9/2017 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419486 11/9/2017 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC Continued... 104.56 HOUR METERS 445328 183878-1 5934.6530 REPAIR PARTS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 104.56

419487 11/9/2017 124733 HARRIS, JOHN 143.53 JACKET 445478 103117 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 143.53

419488 11/9/2017 141498 HEART OF A TINMAN 175.00 11/12/17 PERFORMANCE 445517 111217 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 175.00

419489 11/9/2017 117186 HELGREN, ADAM 85.46 JEANS 445482 103117 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 85.46

419490 11/9/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 856.22 OCTOBER BOOKINGS 445612 1000100255 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 856.22

419491 11/9/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,306.26 OCT POLICE RADIO FEES 445755 1000100455 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,306.26

419492 11/9/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 169.00 NOVEMBER BUNDLED SERVICES 445756 1000100384 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 169.00

419493 11/9/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 169.00 445758 1000100383 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 169.00

419494 11/9/2017 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 1,169.95 ASSESSING LIFT DESKS 445789 623302REP 421140.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PLANNING EQUIPMENT 1,169.95

419495 11/9/2017 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 347.85 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 445799 46455050 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 86.08 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 445800 46584973 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 433.93 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419496 11/9/2017 128215 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA Continued... 14,451.23 445759 FRANCE 9232.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT AVE-10/17 14,451.23

419497 11/9/2017 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,252.50 445565 926997 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,402.50 445452 927191 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,094.50 445542 927418 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.75 445541 927419 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 258.00 445543 927579 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,029.25

419498 11/9/2017 141489 HOMMER, JACOB 150.00 REFUND 445312 122047 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 150.00

419499 11/9/2017 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES 125.25 KAUFFMAN FOUNDATION EVENT 445310 10-31-2017 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 125.25

419500 11/9/2017 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 5.14 ARTWORK SOLD 445817 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5.14

419501 11/9/2017 120883 HUBBARD, BRIAN 20.00 TZD CONFERENCE PARKING / MEALS 445780 20171106175 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 TZD CONFERENCE PARKING / MEALS 445780 20171106175 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00

419502 11/9/2017 134784 IDEA CREEK LLC, THE 130.00 PLAQUE 445435 94 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 130.00

419503 11/9/2017 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 9.33 ANTIFREEZE 445430 038024516 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 156.84 FILTERS, WIPERS 445691 038024576 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 166.17

419504 11/9/2017 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 1,356.50 445546 57463 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING

CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419504 11/9/2017 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY Continued... 1,356.50

419505 11/9/2017 129077 IVERSON, TRAVIS 243.82 UNIFORM JEANS RAIN JACKET 445483 103117TI 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 243.82

419506 11/9/2017 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 47.65 445445 2740350 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,766.95 445444 2740351 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,341.70 445560 2740352 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 229.33 445559 2740353 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 77.60 445538 2740356 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,280.00 445539 2740362 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,743.23

419507 11/9/2017 100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA INC. 1,888.98 AIR DRYER 445667 10333602-00 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 1,888.98

419508 11/9/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 491.55 445556 5854900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,421.60 445568 5857810 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 50.69 445530 5860627 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5.95 445552 5860629 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 135.87 445522 5860630 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.19 445529 5860631 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 710.23 445521 5860632 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 540.51 445526 5860633 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 537.04 445582 5860634 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 537.07 445525 5860637 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 536.37 445454 5860639 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 831.68 445524 5860640 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 99.19 445520 5860641 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,105.75 445527 5860643 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,141.47 445581 5860655 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 584.64 445767 5860656 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,495.40 445571 5860657 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 536.88 445769 5860658 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,349.76 445761 5860659 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,939.12 445551 5860660 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419508 11/9/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 238.38 445580 5860661 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 578.38 445461 5861829 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 578.38 445570 5861833 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 22,447.10

419509 11/9/2017 141353 JOLLY POPS LLC, THE

275.00 12/7/17 PERFORMANCE 445510 120717 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 275.00

419510 11/9/2017 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK

69.98 UNIFORM JEANS 445467 103117MJ 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 69.98

419511 11/9/2017 137525 KERNS, JOHN

150.00 11/9/17 PERFORMANCE 445516 110917 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00

419512 11/9/2017 136686 KIDCREATE STUDIO

300.00 HALLOWEEN CRAFT SESSION 445634 7920 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 300.00

419513 11/9/2017 100285 KLAPPERICK, TERRY

89.03 UNIFORM PANTS 445474 110117TK 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 89.03

419514 11/9/2017 129942 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA

460.64 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 445509 110217 5760.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 460.64

419515 11/9/2017 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS

150.00 TOW FEE 445627 77595 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 150.00

419516 11/9/2017 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS

150.00 TOW FEE 445628 18208 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 150.00

419517 11/9/2017 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.

21.08 PINS 445671 9305350884 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 491.96 PRIMARY WIRE, BATTERY CABLE 445772 9305360624 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419517 11/9/2017 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 513.04

419518 11/9/2017 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 472.67 445607 11283 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 472.67

419519 11/9/2017 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 856.21 445674 213204 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 856.21

419520 11/9/2017 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 66.30 RADIATOR CAP 445661 P09411 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.07 SET SCREWS 445776 P09499 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 81.37

419521 11/9/2017 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 13,718.42 UNLEADED FUEL 445783 548622 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13,718.42

419522 11/9/2017 137929 MAXEY, ROXANNE 9.96 FOOD REIMBURSMENT 445502 110120172 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 96.37 FOOD REIMBURSMENT 445502 110120172 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 291.34 FOOD REIMBURSMENT 445502 110120172 5552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 397.67

419523 11/9/2017 137819 MCCONNACH, COREY 46.01 MILEAGE 445503 11012017 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 46.01

419524 11/9/2017 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,288.00 IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE TRIP 445650 110217 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,288.00

419525 11/9/2017 137195 MELBY, MELISSA 420.55 ARTWORK SOLD 445820 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 420.55

419526 11/9/2017 101625 METRO FIRE CHIEFS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 100.00 TOM SCHMITZ - 2018 DUES 445616 110217 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419526 11/9/2017 101625 METRO FIRE CHIEFS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Continued...

419527 11/9/2017 100885 METRO SALES INC 12.42 PRINTER INK DELIVERY 445693 INV924204 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 12.42

419528 11/9/2017 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 9,840.60 OCT SAC 2017 445750 102017 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 9,840.60

419529 11/9/2017 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 59.36 CABLE ASSY 445706 504951 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 96.44 BUCKLE ASSEMBLY 445701 505484 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 155.80

419530 11/9/2017 104650 MICRO CENTER 215.87 445645 6822631 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 215.87

419531 11/9/2017 139880 MID CITY SERVICES - INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY 44.00 RUG LAUNDERING 445797 69405 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.00

419532 11/9/2017 139486 MID-AMERICA SPORTS CONSTRUCTION 610,023.50 MID-AMERICA PAYMENT AP 008 445746 APP 008-10/17 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 610,023.50

419533 11/9/2017 138058 MILLER, JAKE

112.89 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 445464 103017 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 112.89

419534 11/9/2017 122473 MILLER, KATHERINE 5.14 ARTWORK SOLD 445821 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5.14

419535 11/9/2017 102769 MILLER, TOM

49.50 LESSONS 10/19-11/2 445507 11217 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 49.50

419536 11/9/2017 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER

2,635.00 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 445668 35557 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419536 11/9/2017 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER Continued... 2,635.00

419537 11/9/2017 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 54.87 CO2, METHAIR 445638 00017414 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 54.87

419538 11/9/2017 102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAND 150.00 12/10/17 PERFORMANCE 4.45511 121017.1 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00

419539 11/9/2017 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 163.62 HVAC MATERIAL 445665 01555202-DO 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 130.90- HVAC MATERIAL 445666 1556688-00 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 32.72

419540 11/9/2017 140383 MINNESOTA CARPET OUTLET 370.14 LOBBY CARPET 445747 995758BALDUE 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 1,841.28 PRO SHOP CARPET 445749 995762 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 927.36 ENTRY AND HALL CARPET 445748 995880 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 3,138.78

419541 11/9/2017 139322 MINNESOTA DESIGN BUILD LLC 2,500.00 6616 INDIAN HILLS CIR ESCROW 445390 154151 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00

419542 11/9/2017 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 567.50 445420 79510 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 567.50

419543 11/9/2017 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 62.32 445421 0121930-IN 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 62.32

419544 11/9/2017 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 88.00 445433 23914 5952.6575 PRINTING RECYCLING 93.01 445656 23925 1160.6575 PRINTING FINANCE 181.01

419545 11/9/2017 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 314.80 445550 3263 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419545 11/9/2017 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC Continued... 281.05 445540 3323 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 595.85

419546 11/9/2017 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP

22.78 LAMP ASSY 445702 553322F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.78

419547 11/9/2017 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN

200.00 12/21/17 PERFORMANCE 445514 122117 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00

419548 11/9/2017 130266 MUNICODE

632.00 SUPPLEMENT 7 UPDATE 2 445642 00298060 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 632.00

419549 11/9/2017 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY

8,600.00 LIGHTING PANEL UPDATE FOR PARK 445672 12473 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 8,600.00

419550 11/9/2017 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS

7.39 EXHAUST CLAMP 445690 2122-265792 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.39

419551 11/9/2017 100763 NEOPOST USA INC

251.67 POSTAGE MACHINE MAINTAND RENT 445324 55269069 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 251.67

419552 11/9/2017 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.

910.50 445457 125488 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,008.00 445563 125489 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,918.50

419553 11/9/2017 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC

28.71 SWITCH 445660 44676 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.71

419554 11/9/2017 101941 NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS

67,830.00 SOUTH CONDENSER REPLACEMENT 445694 71687 47105.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Arena So. Condense Tower Repla 2,000.00 SOUTH CONDENSER PIPING 445594 71688 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 69,830.00 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419554 11/9/2017 101941 NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS Continued...

419555 11/9/2017 137198 NORTON, KITTY 250.00 11/30/17 PERFORMANCE 445603 113017 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 250.00

419556 11/9/2017 139023 NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 41.52 FILTERS 445699 7111532P 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.52

419557 11/9/2017 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 211.50 CHAIN 445697 610143 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.92 CHAIN EYE 445698 610145 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 282.42

419558 11/9/2017 101659 ORKIN 150.40 GRANGE CAHILL PEST CONTROL 445675 161429509 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 150.40

419559 11/9/2017 104895 OVERHEAD DOOR CO. 149.95 LOBBY SECURITY GATE 445811 102367 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 149.95

419560 11/9/2017 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,196.60 445707 8609310 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.25 445708 8609311 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 679.15 445447 8609312 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 264.75 445572 8609322 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,176.75

419561 11/9/2017 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,040.13 445567 2254738 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 172.72 445533 2256634 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 130.88 445531 2256635 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,156.83 445532 2256636 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 54.19 445768 2256642 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,773.42 445763 2256643 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,189.72 445762 2256644 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,517.89

419562 11/9/2017 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419562 11/9/2017 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL Continued... 108.00 PEST CONTROL 445805 5803548 5720.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 108.00

419563 11/9/2017 138292 PRECISE IRRIGATION

1,033.36 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION 445681 2135 5765.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROMENADE EXPENSES 4,037.50 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION 445682 2154 5761.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5,070.86

419564 11/9/2017 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC

900.00 445692 IN200-1014577 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 900.00

419565 11/9/2017 101744 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS

5,200.00 SL1 REPLACEMENT PUMP 445785 34358 5934.6530 REPAIR PARTS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 5,200.00

419566 11/9/2017 139009 RAINBOW LAWNCARE

535.00 ESCROW FUNDS FOR SOIL WORK 445712 ED147128-11/3/1 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 7

535.00 HYDROSEED PAYMENT 445711 ED147143-11/03/ 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2017 1,070.00

419567 11/9/2017 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC.

170.00 445608 K-13533-2655 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 170.00

419568 11/9/2017 106036 REITER, JERRY

137.00 GLOVES SOCKS JEANS 445479 103117 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 137.00

419569 11/9/2017 118155 RENEWAL BY ANDERSON

248.64 80% PERMIT FEE REFUND 445714 ED157340 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 221.28 80% PERMIT FEE REFUND 445713 ED157667 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 469.92

419570 11/9/2017 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 38,181.96 RECYCLING 445655 0894-004482201 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 38,181.96 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419571 11/9/2017 108659 RICHTER, BRIAN Continued... 100.00 12/17/17 PERFORMANCE 445513 121717 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00

419572 11/9/2017 117073 RINEHART, THOMAS 83.38 UNIFORM JEANS SOCKS 445465 103117TR 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 83.38

419573 11/9/2017 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 124.21 CLEAN OUT PARTS WASHER 445777 R002435153 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.21

419574 11/9/2017 137059 SAHR, GRANT 25.00 SAFETY GLASSES 445466 103117GS 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 25.00

419575 11/9/2017 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 898.71 LIBRARY ELEVATOR 445676 8104658841 1653.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 822.84 RAMP ELEVATOR 445677 8104659432 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,721.55

419576 11/9/2017 100080 SCHMOLL, RUTH 201.66 PETTY CASH 445615 110317 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 201.66

419577 11/9/2017 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT 942.00 OCT SELECTACCOUNT INVOICE 445753 008816-10/17 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 942.00

419578 11/9/2017 120784 SIGN PRO 185.00 DASHERBOARD FABRICATION 445644 12285 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 185.00

419579 11/9/2017 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 1,421.65 SPRINKLER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 445795 84241215 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,421.65

419580 11/9/2017 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 45.36 445810 322746 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 45.36 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419581 11/9/2017 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL Continued... 645.62- CREDIT MEMO 442513 ARR/86451834 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.50 PICK SET 442514 ARV/33754119 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 764.05 PRY BAR, PUNCH SETS 445669 ARV/34171142 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 174.93

419582 11/9/2017 129587 SOLBERG, DAVID

175.00 SAFETY BOOTS, UNIFORM JEANS 445476 103117DS 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 176.27 SAFETY BOOTS, UNIFORM JEANS 445476 103117DS 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 351.27

419583 11/9/2017 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTERY

241.60 445736 1557C 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 241.60 445737 1558C 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 483.20

419584 11/9/2017 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS

187.30 445443 1608408 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,423.86 445456 1608409 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,687.60 445442 1608410 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 153.80 445566 1608416 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,959.81 445583 1608417 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 133.56 445710 1608417A 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.40 445553 1608418 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,856.00 445561 1608419 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 271.60 445460 1609756 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 12,675.93

419585 11/9/2017 103658 ST LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND

75.00 PERFORMANCE ON 12/10/17 445512 120317 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 75.00

419586 11/9/2017 123629 ST PAUL POLICE BAND

200.00 11/5/17 PERFORMANCE 445515 110517 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00

419587 11/9/2017 108680 ST. PAUL UTILITIES INC.

33,063.44 445409 2017STORMSEWER 04430.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS MS4 Maintenance Repairs 33,063.44

419588 11/9/2017 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 — 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419588 11/9/2017 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Continued... 153.00 445610 18355 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 153.00

419589 11/9/2017 128371 STEINMETZ, ROBERT 156.76 UNIFORM JEANS 445469 103117BS 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 156.76

419590 11/9/2017 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 60.50 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL 445662 10149499 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.50

419591 11/9/2017 103307 SWANSON, LEE 111.53 JEANS HAT 445592 11217 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 111.53

419592 11/9/2017 129311 SYVERTSEN, MARSHALL 72.74 GLOVES HATS 445480 103117 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 72.74

419593 11/9/2017 121517 THIEDE, JOHN 175.00 SAFETY BOOTS, AMOUNT ONLY 445781 110617 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 175.00

419594 11/9/2017 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 513.00 DRAFT 10/17 CC MINUTES 445643 M23306 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 513.00

419595 11/9/2017 120595 T-MOBILE 34.52 ENGINEERING GPS 445620 477067848-10/17 1261.6188 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 34.52

419596 11/9/2017 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 33.11 WELDING GAS 445670 40072764 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.11

419597 11/9/2017 122302 TOUCHPOINT LOGIC LLC 210.00 FIX CHAMBERS CRESTRON 445635 4335 1130.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS 210.00

419598 11/9/2017 104064 TRANS UNION LLC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419598 11/9/2017 104064 TRANS UNION LLC Continued... 5.30 BACKGROUND CHECKS 445757 10712989 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5.30

419599 11/9/2017 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE

115.05 OCTOBER USAGE 445611 269634-11/17 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 115.05

419600 11/9/2017 103048 U.S. BANK

425.00 PAYING AGENT- 2013A BONDS 445658 4792946 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 425.00 PAYING AGENT - 2013B BONDS 445659 4792947 5210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 450.00 PAYING AGENT - 2011A BONDS 445657 4798932 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 1,300.00

419601 11/9/2017 139419 UNDERTONE MUSIC

150.00 VO CLASS 445614 110217 1130.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 150.00

419602 11/9/2017 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE

23.94 SHIP WATER SAMPLES 445685 TRAN:6376 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 12.85 SHIP WATER SAMPLES 445684 TRAN:6447 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 10.41 RETURNED PAGER TO SPOK 445636 TRAN:6978 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 47.20

419603 11/9/2017 141490 USEM, MARC

46.21 REFUND 445313 110301 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 46.21

419604 11/9/2017 101058 VAN PAPER CO.

148.80 445729 442378-00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 621.43 445730 442379-00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 59.69 445733 442380-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 468.24 445734 442381-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 319.96 445731 442385-00 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 95.84 445732 442386-00 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 267.50 445440 442609-01 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 1,981.46

419605 11/9/2017 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC.

73.45 PED BRIDGE 445663 S000960696.001 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 218.46 K9 MEMORIAL LIGHTING MATERIAL 445686 S000967358.001 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419605 11/9/2017 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. Continued... 291.91

419606 11/9/2017 141494 WAGNER LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION INC. 970.61 IRRIGATION REPAIR 445619 2017-7384 01441.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Birchcrest A 875.53 IRRIGATION REPAIR 445618 2017-7385 01441.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Birchcrest A 1,846.14

419607 11/9/2017 131542 WAGNER, JOSH 430.24 MILEAGE/EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 445470 10312017B 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 430.24

419608 11/9/2017 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 48.52 BRAEMAR ARENA TRASH 445678 7668399-2282-6 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 48.52

419609 11/9/2017 141491 WIGNES, GARY 160.00 REFUND 445314 84052 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 160.00

419610 11/9/2017 141493 WILLIAMS, LAWRENCE 217.32 REFUND 445316 76117 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 217.32

419611 11/9/2017 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 5.95 445577 7156499 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 270.29 445523 7156500 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,334.37 445579 7156504 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,596.56 445578 7156505 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,207.17

419612 11/9/2017 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 935.16 CIVITAS 445744 000061985249 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 133.65- REBATE 438593 61835005 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 801.51

419613 11/9/2017 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 572.00 445601 18-0-001686-700 5924.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 572.00 445601 18-0-001686-700 5925.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 572.00 445601 18-0-001686-700 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 1,716.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/7/2017 14:31:58

Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419613 11/9/2017 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. Continued...

419614 11/9/2017 101726 XCEL ENERGY

103.68 51-0193479-4 445362 566583389 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 1,392.62 51-5107681-4 445365 566636336 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,771.00 51-5547446-1 445366 566647528 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 98.99 51-6692497-0 445427 566660263 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 54.22 51-4420190-3 445373 566673077 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 223.88 51-8987646-8 445368 566684308 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 491.27 51-9011854-4 445374 566685476 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 6,401.67 51-9603061-0 445364 566691622 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 321.13 51-9608462-5 445375 566692512 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,056.56 51-0010060454-7 445367 566701698 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 16.74 51-0010619788-5 445363 566704407 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 31.82 51-0010504853-2 445372 566704991 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 16.60 51-0010619810-4 445371 566713531 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 17.21 51-0010876027-9 445370 566714457 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 15.22 51-0011342111-2 445369 566724622 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 39.91 51-0010103585-7 445428 566871508 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 30,083.24 51-4621797-2 445426 566993569 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,165.19 51-9251919-0 445429 567059096 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 27,946.65 445653 567544435 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,570.27 445653 567544435 5553.6185 LIGHT & POWER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 72,817.87

419615 11/9/2017 102500 ZIMMERMAN, TIM

121.14 JEANS 445477 103017 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 121.14

1,309,570.03 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals

Checks 1,271,785.46 A/P ACH Payment 37,784.57 Total Payments 1,309,570.03 11/7/2017 14:32:10 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1

11/9/2017 - 11/9/2017

Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 166,243.22 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 300.00 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 1,001.25 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 425.00 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 450.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 132,361.23 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,846.14 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,169.95 05100 ART CENTER FUND 8,677.20 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,521.47 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 936.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 615,171.55 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 41,624.80 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 3,324.52 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 13,238.82 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 7,004.78 05800 LIQUOR FUND 170,508.81 05900 UTILITY FUND 46,367.49 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 39,043.68 05950 RECYCLING FUND 38,269.96 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 5,632.93 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 14,451.23

Report Totals 1,309,570.03

R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5680 11/16/2017 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 387.29 FILTERS 445964 0153835-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.65 GAUGE 445961 0153845-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.36 TIE DOWN STRAP 445960 0153846-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 430.30

5681 11/16/2017 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 36.66 446055 2176200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 75.60 446154 2179672 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 112.26

5682 11/16/2017 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 62.34 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CERTIFICATIO 445987 158176 1400.6514 INSPECTION EXPENSES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.96 CITY HALL FIRE EXT 446035 158177 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 120.30

5683 11/16/2017 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 20,376.50 446017 23271514.00-17 04427.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Comp Water Resource Mgmt Plan 20,376.50

5684 11/16/2017 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 5,081.90 446056 61331500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 939.75 446049 61527700 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,939.09 446155 61527800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,461.27 446062 61527900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 422.20 446156 61554800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.15 446058 61554900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 112.01 446054 96669500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 355.66 446061 96736900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 14,348.03

5685 11/16/2017 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 6,177.00 445940 B109066 9232.6133 PROFESS SERVICES-ENGINEERING CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 6,177.00

5686 11/16/2017 137533 BUSBY, TREVOR 1,125.00 NOV. BASKETBALL OFFICIALS 446031 1-BASKETBALL011 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES /17 700.00 NOV. VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 446032 2-VOLLEYBALL-11 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES /17 1,825.00

11/15/2017 8:26:34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5686 11/16/2017 137533 BUSBY, TREVOR Continued...

5687 11/16/2017 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 37.21- BERTELSON CREDIT 445649 CP-OE-441453-1- 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1 22.99- CREDIT FOR REPLACEMENT CLOCK 445327 CP-OE-457312-1- 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 2 131.15- MAILING TUBES 446036 CP-OE-462576-1- 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 1 22.99 REPLACEMENT CLOCK 445323 OE-462429-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 131.15 MAILING TUBES 446029 OE-462576-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 56.92 WIPES/STAPLES/REMOVER 446016 OE-462984-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 151.85 SUPPLIES 445983 W0-334869-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 66.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 445989 WO-335507-1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 238.36

5688 11/16/2017 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 17,072.10 OCTOBER LEGAL SERVICES 446231 2851-000G-128 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 17,072.10

5689 11/16/2017 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 105.75 PUBLIC IMPROVE HRNG NTC 446275 543939 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 176.25 AFB PUBLICATION 446276 543940 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 105.75 PUBLISH IMP. HRNG NOTICE 446277 543941 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 129.25 446278 543942 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 716.94 EDITION: EDINA- NOVEMBER 445976 54439 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 477.96 EDITION: EDINA- NOVEMBER 445975 544438 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 230.33 446045 544440 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 230.33 446045 544440 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 230.34 446045 544440 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,402.90

5690 11/16/2017 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 3.42 FITTINGS FOR CHEMICAL PIPING 445970 1102207 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3.42

5691 11/16/2017 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 63.07 446040 125203 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 10.63 446041 125208 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 73.70 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5692 11/16/2017 103944 MED COMPASS Continued... 50.70 HEARING TEST 446015 32310 1261.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 152.25 HEARING TEST 446015 32310 1640.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 365.04 HEARING TEST 446015 32310 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50.75 HEARING TEST 446015 32310 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 30.42 HEARING TEST 446015 32310 5760.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 60.84 HEARING TEST 446015 32310 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 710.00

5693 11/16/2017 101483 MENARDS 98.70 TOOLS/SUPPLIES 445979 54856 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 110.73 FLASHLIGHT/HAMMER/WRENCH 445980 54924 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 99.87 PLATFORM MATERIAL 445969 55145 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 14.71 446195 55172 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 31.45 SUMP LINE 445968 55233 5932.6535 PIPE GENERAL STORM SEWER 355.46

5694 11/16/2017 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 239.40 446034 50353 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 358.65 446034 50353 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 598.05

5695 11/16/2017 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 780.00 HVAC SERVICE 446021 75207 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 780.00

5696 11/16/2017 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 400.89 TOWELS, LINERS, FOAMY CLEANER 446019 13376 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 986.44 BDAY CUTLERY, PLATES, CUPS 446018 13377 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,387.33

5697 11/16/2017 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 21.99 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 446222 111317 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.99

5698 11/16/2017 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 40.00 CINDY'S BUSINESS CARDS 445952 97469 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 46.58 CTS PORTION OF BIZ CARDS 445952 97469 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 60.00 SHARON'S BUS. CARDS 445952 97469 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 50.00 BUS CARDS - LIAISON 445933 97492 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 196.58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017 - 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5698 11/16/2017 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS Continued...

5699 11/16/2017 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 95.53 AIR LINE FITINGS 445972 S3512391.001 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 95.53

5700 11/16/2017 101015 STREICHERS 128.49 VEST CARRIER 445953 11286590 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 128.49

5701 11/16/2017 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 1,603.59 TANK 446233 JI23150 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,603.59

5702 11/16/2017 119454 VINOCOPIA 129.00 446103 0192559 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 132.00 446078 0193099 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 649.25 446106 192033 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 451.50 446171 192571 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 114.00 446127 193098 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 150.75 446191 193109 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,626.50

5703 11/16/2017 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 55.80 445944 50162658 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 55.80

5704 11/16/2017 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 612.00 POLICE BADGE STICKERS 445990 9073011 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 337.25 KOOZIES FOR EMPLOYEE LUNCHEON 446214 9158011 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 949.25

5705 11/16/2017 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,753.45 446089 52977 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 964.45 445887 53642 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 672.36 445855 53660 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 1,185.65 446180 53663 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 74.10 446169 54015 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 72.00 446173 54016 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,722.01 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017— 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419616 11/16/2017 100612 A.M. LEONARD Continued... 1,082.24 SHOVELS, HORT. SUPPLIES 446022 CI17191204 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,082.24

419617 11/16/2017 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 764.28 446196 205719-001 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 764.28

419618 11/16/2017 129458 ACME TOOLS 432.97 446028 5341501 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 483.10 446009 5341515 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 143.76 446026 5347119 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 47.99 446027 5347287 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 41.97 446251 5351537 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,149.79

419619 11/16/2017 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 139.61 LAUNDRY 446025 1003961257 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 140.10 446044 1003963477 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 96.79 446043 1003963487 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 376.50

419620 11/16/2017 141510 ANDERSON, ELENA 60.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 445904 110717 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 60.00

419621 11/16/2017 118491 APPLE INC. 4,691.00 445956 4464679515 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,69t00

419622 11/16/2017 141533 APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,435.23 MN-TF1 CONFINED SPACE 446213 111317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,435.23

419623 11/16/2017 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,394.10 446051 3217533 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 958.50 446048 3220709 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,037.10 446057 3220710 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,389.70

419624 11/16/2017 139805 BAULER, NICK R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419624 11/16/2017 139805 BAULER, NICK Continued... 84.38 EXPENSE REPORT 445931 110817 1262.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRANSPORTATION 84.38

419625 11/16/2017 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 234.00 445941 4715108 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 234.00

419626 11/16/2017 125139 BERNICK'S 614.00 446060 381072 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 100.00 446052 391068 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 684.70 446053 391069 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 60.00 446059 391071 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 301.90 445889 391173 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,760.60

419627 11/16/2017 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 80.12 445942 508053 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 178.18 445943 508100 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 258.30

419628 11/16/2017 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 32,994.42 446264 27051 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 32,994.42

419629 11/16/2017 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1,046.56 EXTERIOR LIGHTING REPAIR 445994 914100742 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 1,046.56

419630 11/16/2017 140149 BORGSTROM, ERIK JON 533.33 446046 INV-E0008 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 533.33 446046 INV-E0008 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 533.34 446046 INV-E0008 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,600.00

419631 11/16/2017 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,301.00 446098 145986 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 536.97 446050 146196 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 175.00 446157 146197 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 669.50 446110 146279 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 227.00 446269 146319 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419631 11/16/2017 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS Continued-. 2,909.47

419632 11/16/2017 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,910.93 446139 1080708936 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 120.07 446142 1080708937 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 195.76 446140 1080708938 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 612.42 446145 1080710859 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 154.44 446138 1080712364 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,138.56 446141 1080712365 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,486.36 446146 1080712366 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 109.76 446143 1080712367 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,996.11 445842 1080715589 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8,852.21 445898 1080715590 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 146.30 445897 1080715591 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 400.42 445864 1080715592 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,048.50 445865 1080715593 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,646.43 446151 1080715664 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 55.72 446150 1080715666 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 180.60 446149 1080717036 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 191.45 446148 1080717037 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,232.11 446147 1080717038 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 40.00- 445830 2080184850 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 220.00- 445832 2080184851 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 40.00- 445828 2080184853 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 70.00- 445829 2080184855 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 215.00- 445895 2080184859 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 160.00- 445831 2080184867 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 27.41- 445896 2080186941 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 31,705.74

419633 11/16/2017 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 149.00 446081 1090781997 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,326.80 446082 1090782529 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 76.65 446083 1090782530 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,243.35 446080 1090783432 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,083.90 446153 1090785293 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 76.65 446152 1090785294 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,591.00 446144 1090785295 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11,547.35 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419634 11/16/2017 104595 BUCKENTINE, JOHN Continued... 149.00 SOCKS JEANS 445929 110217 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 149.00

419635 11/16/2017 140503 BURNSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT 7,158.48 MN-TF1 UQT/CONFINED SPACE 446209 111317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 7,158.48

419636 11/16/2017 141523 BURNSVILLE TOYOTA & SCION 23,430.00 REPLACEMENT VEHICLE 446263 70180 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 23,430.00

419637 11/16/2017 141525 CAPITAL EQUITY LLC 25.10 REFUND 446175 79144 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 25.10

419638 11/16/2017 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 42.00- 445840 2009952 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 239.50 445856 2026297 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 64.20 445857 2026299 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,988.60 445837 2026300 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,722.15 446092 2026301 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,072.45 446270 2029210 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 16.40- 445839 461-42 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 151.25 445835 461-88 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 42.50 446091 461-90 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12,222.25

419639 11/16/2017 129923 CAWLEY COMPANY, THE 20.64 NAME BADGE-ALLISON 446230 V496795 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 30.97 NAME BADGES - TUCKER 446230 V496795 9232.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 51.61

419640 11/16/2017 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 1,319.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 445937 C1850622 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,380.50 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 445938 C1850623 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,337.50 CONCRETE REDIE MIX 446236 C1851580 1365.6520 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE 606.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 446261 C1853695 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 4,643.00

419641 11/16/2017 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419641 11/16/2017 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 20.38 445868 8000014561-10/1 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7 52.80 445868 8000014561-10/1 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 7 174.84 445868 8000014561-10/1 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 7 279.16 445868 8000014561-10/1 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 7 553.34 445868 8000014561-10/1 1646.6166 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7 275.57 445868 8000014561-10/1 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 7 45.22 445868 8000014561-10/1 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 7 255.23 445868 8000014561-10/1 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 7 3,785.42 445868 8000014561-10/1 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 7 173.65 445868 8000014561-10/1 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 7 20.38 445868 8000014561-10/1 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 7 36.32 445868 8000014561-10/1 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 7 51.04 445868 8000014561-10/1 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 7 121.63 445868 8000014561-10/1 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 7 152.05 445868 8000014561-10/1 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 7 505.99 445868 8000014561-10/1 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 7 6,503.02

419642 11/16/2017 123898 CENTURYLINK 63.98 445875 0146-10/17 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 176.38 445875 0146-10/17 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 178.65 445875 0146-10/17 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 309.68 445875 0146-10/17 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 310.00 445875 0146-10/17 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419642 11/16/2017 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 60.26 445875 0146-10/17 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 39.59 445875 0146-10/17 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 93.88 952 941-1019 445877 1019-10/17 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 61.91 952 941-1410 445876 1410-10/17 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 117.15 952 826-7398 445878 7398-10/17 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 1,411.48

419643 11/16/2017 104283 CHISAGO COUNTY 200.00 CHISAGO COUNTY WARRANT 446250 20171115JL 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00

419644 11/16/2017 102504 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 408.00 IT CONFERENCE 446037 14306 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 408.00

419645 11/16/2017 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 214.70 CITY AND STATE FLAG 445997 COM-1376 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 214.70

419646 11/16/2017 140274 CIVICPLUS 1,200.00 WEBSITE TRAINING - SEPTEMBER 445973 167863 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,200.00

419647 11/16/2017 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION 327.71 446104 3641204522 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 327.71

419648 11/16/2017 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 290.89 446227 P00008507 01444.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Parklawn Ave 290.89

419649 11/16/2017 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 91.92 24" EASY FORMS 446260 0165676-IN 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 350.00 DIGITAL LEVEL 446259 0165677-IN 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 441.92

419650 11/16/2017 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 233.89 446038 INV000120164 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 233.89 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017— 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419651 11/16/2017 141535 COSTELLO, CHAD Continued... 48.87 REFUND 446242 121355 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 48.87

419652 11/16/2017 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 318.15 BOTTLED WATER SUPPLY 445985 114-100149090-1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 0/17 318.15

419653 11/16/2017 139367 CURWIN, GRACE 39.25 LEARN TO SKATE REGISTRATION 445928 11082017 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENAADMINISTRATION 39.25

419654 11/16/2017 116713 DAVEY TREE EXPERT CO., THE 2,370.00 TREE REIMS AT M129 445951 911903804 03499.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Sewer Trunk Expansion - Xerxes 2,370.00

419655 11/16/2017 139064 DAVIES, JOAN 225.00 TAP DANCE CLASS 446212 11132017 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 225.00

419656 11/16/2017 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 403.39 JAN - OCT 2017 MILEAGE 445930 110617 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 403.39

419657 11/16/2017 103013 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 20.00 445891 2018 CARDS 5820.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 50TH STREET GENERAL 20.00 445891 2018 CARDS 5840.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 20.00 445891 2018 CARDS 5860.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 60.00

419658 11/16/2017 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 12,641.00 NORTH RAMP - LEGAL REVIEW 445935 3378957 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 12,641.00

419659 11/16/2017 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 4,332.06 445955 827001847-17 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,332.06

419660 11/16/2017 100737 E. H. RENNER & SONS 26,788.00 446234 000158550000 05570.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS General Rehab-Water R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017— 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419660 11/16/2017 100737 E. H. RENNER & SONS Continued-. 26,788.00

419661 11/16/2017 140501 EAGAN FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,630.96 MN-TF1 UQT/CONFINED SPACE 446207 111317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,630.96

419662 11/16/2017 140559 EDEN COMPANY, THE 6,400.00 GR GREEN PROJ COORD 445934 6 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 6,400.00

419663 11/16/2017 101656 EDINA CHORALE 300.00 ADVERTISING EDINAART CENTER 445903 110717 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 300.00

419664 11/16/2017 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 1,279.98 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 446014 1939128 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,286.19 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 446013 1940357 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 639.99 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 446012 1943758 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 132.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 446010 1944027 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 518.25 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 446011 1945179 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,856.91

419665 11/16/2017 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 294.83- CREDIT MEMO 445493 1-5394772 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.23 BATTERIES 445959 1-Z12578 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 190.71 BATTERIES 445494 69-287486 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 222.00 BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS 445966 69-289248 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 148.11

419666 11/16/2017 141528 FARMINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,800.00 MN-TF1: CONFINED SPACE/UQT 446203 111317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,800.00

419667 11/16/2017 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 1,653.50 METER FOR RESALE 446232 0266710 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 1,653.50

419668 11/16/2017 116189 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC. 2,226.80 HVAC FILTERS 445954 82184 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 2,226.80 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419668 11/16/2017 116189 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC. Continued...

419669 11/16/2017 100764 G & K SERVICES 19.73 RENTAL UNIFORM 446005 6006760775 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 14.46 RENTAL UNIFORM 446004 6006760776 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.74 RENTAL UNIFORM 446003 6006760777 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.93

419670 11/16/2017 141540 GOEBEL, URSULA 15.00 REFUND REV RECAPTURE FEE 446255 111417 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 15.00

419671 11/16/2017 101103 GRAINGER 6.98 NIPPLE 445958 9607988616 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 386.36 WATER FILTER 445967 9610207897 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 170.12 446252 9614157163 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 62.72 446253 9614157171 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 626.18

419672 11/16/2017 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 92.25 446096 MN00029773 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 101.25 446064 MN00030102 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 702.75 445844 MN00030105 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 501.75 446158 MN00030135 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,398.00

419673 11/16/2017 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 472.10 TRAFFIC CONTROL LOOP WIRE 445981 9300201465 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 202.78- TRAFFIC CONTROL LOOP WIRE 445982 9300361528CREDI 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE T 1,033.55 DAMAGED SOUTH RAMP FIXTURE 445995 9300899147 4090.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,302.87

419674 11/16/2017 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 20.34 BLK DIRT 445988 9528260366-10/1 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 7 249.80 BLK DIRT, SOD 445988 9528260366-10/1 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 7 42.00 BLK DIRT 445988 9528260366-10/1 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 7 312.14 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017— 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419674 11/16/2017 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. Continued...

419675 11/16/2017 141531 HASTINGS FIRE DEPARTMENT 522.34 MN-TF1 UQT 446210 111317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 522.34

419676 11/16/2017 139501 HCT 25.00 LICENSE PLATES 445906 110817 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.00

419677 11/16/2017 139501 HCT 1,559.70 LICENSE PLATE 446235 111417 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,559.70

419678 11/16/2017 141541 HELSETH, MARK 8.40 REFUND 446247 91193 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 8.40

419679 11/16/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,543.86 OCTOBER RADIO FEES - FIRE DEPT 446267 1000100454 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,543.86

419680 11/16/2017 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 37.98 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 446030 46954731 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 37.98

419681 11/16/2017 141418 HILL, STEVEN 1,647.00 ARTWORK SOLD 445911 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 327.50 5110.6103 446111 111017 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,974.50

419682 11/16/2017 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,414.50 445838 928210 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,383.75 445858 928348 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,188.00 446090 928661 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 874.50 446272 929617 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,860.75

419683 11/16/2017 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES 31.11 LUNCHMTG9/26FRANCEPROJ 446254 11-14-2017 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 31.11 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017— 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419683 11/16/2017 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES Continued...

419684 11/16/2017 133421 HUDSON, TRACY 200.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 445905 110717 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 200.00

419685 11/16/2017 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 455.00 445853 57559 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 455.00

419686 11/16/2017 131794 INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2,320.00 LEAD TESTING 446237 00024514 7412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE 2,320.00

419687 11/16/2017 116152 INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB 2,073.50 ULI DINNER 446215 10/12 BANQUET 1500.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CONTINGENCIES 2,073.50

419688 11/16/2017 141530 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT 91.00 MN-TF1 UQT 446208 111317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 91.00

419689 11/16/2017 141543 JAEGER, FRED 4.98 REFUND 446262 87592 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 4.98

419690 11/16/2017 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 4,632.40 446086 2740331 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11,387.10 445892 2740355 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,891.55 445846 2740373 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 98.30 445847 2740374 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,027.40 445862 2740381 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 445863 2740382 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 96.25 446109 2740385 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 21,154.50

419691 11/16/2017 123551 JMS CUSTOM HOMES LLC 2,038.50 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 445920 ED156709 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 2,038.50

419692 11/16/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419692 11/16/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 91.44- 445899 5832933 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,698.04 446130 5854883 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 884.05 446129 5854886 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,730.32 446128 5854887 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 103.19 446108 5854889 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 73.80 446085 5856097 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 612.99 446114 5860635 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,723.47 446117 5860642 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 38.19 446100 5860645 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,601.50 446118 5860646 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,140.24 446115 5860647 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 562.06 446119 5860650 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 436.76 446116 5860651 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 578.38 446160 5861831 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3.57 446135 5866047 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 431.74 446077 5866048 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2.38 446071 5866049 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5.95 446165 5866050 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VV1NE YORK SELLING 337.06 446076 5866051 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 458.21 446075 5866052 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,810.62 446073 5866053 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 230.02 446074 5866054 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,414.11 446072 5866055 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,396.98 446168 5866057 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,684.47 446163 5866058 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,851.37 446167 5866059 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,606.37 446166 5866060 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 420.35 446162 5866061 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,499.07 446164 5866062 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 388.36 446161 5866063 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,155.09 446132 5866066 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 38.19 446131 5866067 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,876.43 446136 5866068 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,459.18 446137 5866069 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,283.49 446134 5866070 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 647.19 446113 5866071 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 12,629.25 446218 5866072 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 99.19 446133 5866073 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 67.16 446120 635181 PAYBACK 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017— 11/16/2017

419693 11/16/2017 141542 JONES, MARK 410.39 REFUND 446248 90393 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 410.39

419694 11/16/2017 105730 KJOS, PHIL 125.00 PIANO TUNING 446202 11132017 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 125.00

419695 11/16/2017 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 223.00 CONTRACTED SERVICE 445965 17992,18259 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 223.00

419696 11/16/2017 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 20,816.20 OCT. ATTY FEES 445986 103117 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 20,816.20

419697 11/16/2017 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 364.50 446126 11383 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 388.50 446070 11411 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 753.00

419698 11/16/2017 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 1,712.41 445939 213032 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,712.41

419699 11/16/2017 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 436,484.56 445886 0001073774 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 436,484.56

419700 11/16/2017 137645 MEYER-RUUD, JESSE 1,000.00 JESSE ASSISTANCE WITH POLLBOOK 446274 2 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 1,000.00

419701 11/16/2017 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD 125.00 445947 5197 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 125.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017-- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419702 11/16/2017 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT Continued... 14,187.67 WATER 445984 431-0005-11/17 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 14,187.67

419703 11/16/2017 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 128.94 FURNACE SERVICING 446240 1557342-00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 128.94 FURNACE SERVICING 446240 1557342-00 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 160.00- 446200 1557521-00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 160.00 446200 1557521-00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 160.00 446200 1557521-00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 68.71 446194 1557995-00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 486.59

419704 11/16/2017 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 90.00 PENMAN POSTAPPLICATION 446266 201711142017175 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00

419705 11/16/2017 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 296.00 446039 23958 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 296.00

419706 11/16/2017 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 10.00 RUTH DR BOILER 446001 ABR01758381 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS WATER TREATMENT 30.00 CITY HALL BOILER PERMIT 446002 ABR01759411 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 10.00 FILTER PLNT,4500 W 76TH ST 446000 ABR01760771 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS WATER TREATMENT 40.00 BOILER LICENSE - ST.2 446007 ABR01770641 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 BOILER LICENSE - ST.1 446006 ABR01771281 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 160.00

419707 11/16/2017 141527 MRPA/MASS 25.00 MASS MEMBERSHIP 446201 11132017 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 25.00

419708 11/16/2017 140613 MT CARPENTER LANDSCAPE INC. 32.28 DUPLICATE PERMIT 6205 CREST LA 445921 158825 1495.4114 HEATING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 32.28

419709 11/16/2017 141513 MUNDSTOCK, PAMELA 32.50 REFUND DUPLICATE PERMIT 445909 159516 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 32.50 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419710 11/16/2017 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS Continued... 28.18 SEAL 445962 2122-2674501 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.18

419711 11/16/2017 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 886.00 446087 125460 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,681.50 445888 125726 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE 50TH ST SELLING 526.00 445854 125728 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 820.00 446159 125757 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,913.50

419712 11/16/2017 141357 NIEHAUS, CJ 126.75 ARTWORK SOLD 445922 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 126.75

419713 11/16/2017 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 44.00 446193 104515 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 44.00

419714 11/16/2017 141517 NORBLOM PLUMBING 28.48 5100 WOODDALE AVE-CANCELED 445910 159642 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 28.48

419715 11/16/2017 141529 NORTHFIELD HOSPITAL EMS 300.00 MN-TF1 UQT (JOHN HUNTER) 446206 111317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 300.00

419716 11/16/2017 141536 NORTON, KEITH 215.00 REFUND 446243 87479 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 215.00

419717 11/16/2017 141232 NR PROPERTIES INC. 10,000.00 NEW HOME ESCROW REFUND 445907 ED147385 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00

419718 11/16/2017 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 28.60 ARTWORK SOLD 445923 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 28.60

419719 11/16/2017 101659 ORKIN 135.20 PW PEST CONTROL 445999 163332388 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017— 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419719 11/16/2017 101659 ORKIN Continued... 135.20

419720 11/16/2017 104950 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC. 30.00 LEAD TESTING 446238 1702683 7412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE 30.00

419721 11/16/2017 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 1,750.00 HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 446265 111417 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 1,750.00

419722 11/16/2017 102440 PASS, GRACE 66.95 ARTWORK SOLD 445924 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 66.95

419723 11/16/2017 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,557.34 446182 8609263 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,397.81 446099 860931 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,801.97 445843 8609959 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 961.51 445866 8609967 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,718.63

419724 11/16/2017 124239 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC. 20.00 PEP FOR NEW OFFICER 445977 25384 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20.00

419725 11/16/2017 117087 PETERSON COMPANIES 250.00 50TH DIST IRRIGATION BLOWOUT 445998 35658 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 250.00

419726 11/16/2017 116626 PETERSON, HARRIETTE 2.44 ARTWORK SOLD 445925 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.44

419727 11/16/2017 135849 PETSMART #2412 158.96 K9 BLITZ FOOD/SUPPLIES 446268 T-6510 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 158.96

419728 11/16/2017 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 461.93 446102 2252921 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,247.30 446107 2252922 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017 - 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419728 11/16/2017 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 3,554.27 446047 2252923 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,167.13 446079 2254736 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 992.13 446101 2254737 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,121.59 446172 2256638 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 747.29 446187 2260361 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 280.32 446067 2260362 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,426.30 446065 2260363 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,735.27 446066 2260364 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,426.84 446190 2260366 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,444.20 446186 2260367 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 984.94 446122 2260371 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,099.56 446125 2260372 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 79.92 446174 2261152 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 25,768.99

419729 11/16/2017 141537 PIEPHO, ANDREA 30.72 REFUND 446244 76887 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 30.72

419730 11/16/2017 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 63.24 WATER 446023 622833-10-17 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 63.24

419731 11/16/2017 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 60.00 SHARPEN ZAM BLADES 445946 281323 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 60.00

419732 11/16/2017 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 252.00 446183 13533 2885 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 72.00 445841 K-14985-2342 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 324.00

419733 11/16/2017 141544 REIERSGORD, LEE 18.02 REFUND 446249 118581 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 18.02

419734 11/16/2017 125936 REINDERS INC. 155.50 446192 3051066-00 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 155.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419735 11/16/2017 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY Continued... 93.54 445890 17-17649 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 93.54 446181 17650 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 187.08

419736 11/16/2017 141532 ROSEMOUNT FIRE DEPARTMENT 240.00 MN-TF1 UQT 446211 111317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 240.00

419737 11/16/2017 140675 ROSEMOUNT POLICE DEPARTMENT 487.27 MN-TF1 CONFINED SPACE 446205 111317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 487.27

419738 11/16/2017 139439 RUE 38 LLC 310.00 446063 2326 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 310.00

419739 11/16/2017 100995 SEH 935.79 445948 341037 04416.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Morningside A & White Oaks C 125.00 445949 341040 01270.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Xerxes Ave Trail - 3 Riv Reimb 544.00 445949 341040 01268.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Parklawn Ave - 3 Rivers Reimb 3,528.00 445949 341040 01444.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Parklawn Ave 775.00 445949 341040 03501.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Parklawn Ave 1,246.00 445949 341040 05565.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Parklawn Ave 3,790.61 445949 341040 03499.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Sewer Trunk Expansion - Xerxes 460.00 445949 341040 04423.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Parklawn Ave 19,079.34 445950 341041 03499.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Sewer Trunk Expansion - Xerxes 30,483.74

419740 11/16/2017 141546 SEYMOUR, JEFF 223.70 REFUND 446257 115110 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 223.70

419741 11/16/2017 141526 SHAW, TARA R 158.70 REFUND 446176 118581 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 158.70

419742 11/16/2017 101556 SHRED-IT USA 138.60 SHREDDING SERVICE 446020 8123428418 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 138.60 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419743 11/16/2017 120784 SIGN PRO Continued... 175.30 WIFI STICKERS 445974 12280 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 68.00 446219 12282 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 68.00 446219 12282 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 68.00 446219 12282 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 298.00 DASHERBOARD AD 446033 12296 1600.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 677.30

419744 11/16/2017 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 21.98 446198 83411925 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 21.98

419745 11/16/2017 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 168.80 METRIC DRIVER SET 445957 ARV/34235250 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 168.80

419746 11/16/2017 140502 SOUTH METRO FIRE DEPARTMENT 453.51 MN-TF1 PLANS MTG/UQT 446204 111317 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 453.51

419747 11/16/2017 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 4,053.33 446105 1589232 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,643.73 446095 1605683 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,711.66 446121 1605684 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,065.89 446094 1608412 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,502.78 446093 1608413 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,078.54 446097 1608414 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,217.13 445827 1608415 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13,813.60 445893 1608420 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 932.93 446170 1609757 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 532.94 445861 1611092 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,290.60 445860 1611093 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,820.40 445859 1611094 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 277.80 446177 1611095 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,826.37 446178 1611096 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 923.59 446188 1611097 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,687.80 446189 1611098 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 991.47 445852 1611099 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 788.36 445851 1611100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,732.80 445850 1611101 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,127.18 445849 1611102 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017 — 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419747 11/16/2017 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 128.80 445848 1611103 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,419.20 446271 1613086 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 61,566.90

419748 11/16/2017 110977 SOW, ADAMA 81.90 ARTWORK SOLD 445926 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 81.90

419749 11/16/2017 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 90.00 REPLACEMENT KEY 445991 171519 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00

419750 11/16/2017 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 327.00 446084 18354 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 400.00 445836 18379 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 727.00

419751 11/16/2017 141538 STEINKE, LANCE 42.72 REFUND 446245 106335 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 42.72

419752 11/16/2017 141547 SULLIVAN, MICHAEL 40.31 REFUND 446258 123454 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 40.31

419753 11/16/2017 101756 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC. 3,355.10 5146 EDEN - LAND SURVEY 445932 51829 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 3,355.10

419754 11/16/2017 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 724.42 CONCESSION PRODUCT 446024 147542091 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 724.42

419755 11/16/2017 141511 T SCHERBER DEMOLITION AND EXC 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 445908 ED159143 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00

419756 11/16/2017 141539 THOMPSON, RACHEL 31.02 REFUND 446246 90879 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 31.02 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017— 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419756 11/16/2017 141539 THOMPSON, RACHEL Continued...

419757 11/16/2017 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 1,239.40 ELEVATOR SERVICE 446042 3003529327 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE 1,239.40

419758 11/16/2017 123649 TOWMASTER 239.60 RELAY CIRCUIT BREAKER 445963 397845 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 239.60

419759 11/16/2017 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 220.00 446197 41552 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 975.50 446199 41562 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 216.25 446239 41585 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 1,411.75

419760 11/16/2017 129419 ULI MINNESOTA 2,500.00 G GR ULI STUDY 445936 11-07 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 2,500.00

419761 11/16/2017 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 822.56 LOCATOR 445971 408417 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 822.56

419762 11/16/2017 135933 VAN GILDER, BILL 29.25 ARTWORK SOLD 445900 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.25

419763 11/16/2017 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 439.58- LOOP COUNDIT 445978 14355103017 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 227.60 FUSES 445992 S000967465.001 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 204.84 FUSES 445993 S000967465.002 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 22.76 FUSE HOLDER 445996 S000967465.003 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 265.20 EXTERIOR LIGHTING REPAIR 446241 S000967465.004 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 280.82

419764 11/16/2017 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 216.91 445945 104213 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 216.91

419765 11/16/2017 140473 WALLACE, HARRY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017- 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419765 11/16/2017 140473 WALLACE, HARRY Continued... 3.58 ARTWORK SOLD 445901 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 3.58

419766 11/16/2017 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 78.11 W PARK TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 83.01 FS #2TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 117.15 FS #1TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 315.42 CITY HALL TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 332.09 SEN CTR TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 451.66 COURTNEY PARK TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 637.27 PW TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 637.27 PW TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 997.80 ROSLAND PARK TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 203.83 ART CTR TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 315.24 POOL TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 176.43 CLUB HOUSE TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 235.03 BRAAEMAR MNTC TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,510.72 ARENA TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,698.84 EDINBOU TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 100.70 GV LIQ TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 158.39 YORK LIQ TRASH 446008 0033513-2808-7 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 8,048.96

419767 11/16/2017 141545 WHEELER, MARTIN 63.48 REFUND 446256 116115 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 63.48

419768 11/16/2017 102242 WILSON, TERRI 20.00 NOTARY COMMISSION 445894 11062017 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 20.00

419769 11/16/2017 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 63.16- 445833 714725 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 63.16- 445834 714795 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 33.20 445867 7152476A 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 288.00- 446088 715656 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 818.95 446068 7157496 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 41.88 446069 7157497 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 367.14 446184 7157498 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,493.61 446185 7157500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017 - 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 419769 11/16/2017 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 7,880.48 446124 7157502 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 83.76 446123 7157503 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 11,304.70

419770 11/16/2017 141271 WOLFF, MELINDA 159.25 ARTWORK SOLD 445902 110717 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 159.25

419771 11/16/2017 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 538.50 GIS CONSULTING 446112 2-R-010666-000 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 538.50

419772 11/16/2017 101726 XCEL ENERGY 34.51 51-8102668-0 445869 567040029 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,175.10 51-4827232-6 445872 567188484 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 1,424.33 51-5634814-2 445873 567199149 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 525.55 445874 567200190 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,866.09 445874 567200190 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 220.00 51-6046826-0 445870 567201706 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 218.59 51-9337452-8 445871 567237121 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,539.32 51-4966303-6 445879 567546316 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 37.05 51-6137136-8 445885 567563492 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 42.68 51-0194596-8 445883 567662812 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,008.64 445881 567746030 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,383.51 445881 567746030 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,865.39 445881 567746030 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 477.75 51-9422326-6 445884 567767698 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 3,551.94 51-6840050-6 445880 568122350 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 58.64 51-8997917-7 445882 568337893 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 4,519.69 51-6121102-5 446228 568488601 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20,948.78

419773 11/16/2017 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 898.00 446179 18723 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 898.00

1,089,704.81 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals

Checks 1,013,294.36 A/P ACH Payment 76,410.45 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:34

Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary

11/16/2017— 11/16/2017

Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,089,704.81 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals

Checks 1,013,294.36 A/P ACH Payment 76,410.45 Total Payments 1,089,704.81 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 11/15/2017 8:26:46 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1

11/16/2017 - 11/16/2017

Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 144,186.11 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 2,111.51 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 3,818.89 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 23,430.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,813.31 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 1,490.34 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 2,222.06 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 6,470.40 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 4,088.53 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 2,066.31 05800 LIQUOR FUND 303,216.09 05900 UTILITY FUND 519,462.91 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 23,267.66 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,787.83 07500 MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 14,118.79 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 18,898.97 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 12,255.10

Report Totals 1,089,704.81

CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: IV.C.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From: Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief Item Activity: Agreement Between Fire Department and Brycer, Action Subject: LLC

ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize Agreement between Brycer, LLC and the Edina Fire Department.

INTRODUCTION: Brycer, LLC provides The Compliance Engine "Solution" that will assist the Fire Prevention Bureau through an internet based tool to track and drive code compliance and reduce false alarm activity. It provides a secure cloud environment in which third party contractors that inspect, test, and maintain fire protection systems, can submit their reports via Brycer's web portal to the fire department. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Edina MN Brycer_SLA Final MBR Sign

BRYCER, LLC 4355 Weaver Parkway Suite 330 Warrenville, IL 60555

October 19, 2017

Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracy Ave Edina, MN 55436

Attn: Fire Chief Tom Schmitz

Re: “The Compliance Engine”

Dear: Chief Schmitz

We look forward to providing you with “The Compliance Engine” (the “Solution”). This proposal letter provides the basic terms by which Brycer, LLC (“Brycer”) will provide you, Edina Fire Department(“Client”), with the Solution. The use of the Solution and all matters between Brycer and Client will be subject to the standard “Terms and Conditions” attached to this proposal as Exhibit A. The basic terms are as follows:

1. Term: Brycer will provide Client with the Solution for three years, commencing January 1, 2018 (the “Initial Term”). Thereafter, the Term shall automatically renew for successive three year periods unless terminated by Brycer or Client in writing at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the then current Term (each, a “Renewal Term” and together with the Initial Term, the “Term”). Following the expiration or termination of the Term (as provided in the Terms and Conditions), Client shall stop using the Solution; provided, however, Brycer shall make available, and Client shall have the right to download, Client’s data from the Solution for a period of 60 days after the expiration or termination of the Term. Client shall have the right to terminate this agreement upon giving 90 days written notice to Brycer.

2. Fees: Client shall not pay any fees for use of the Solution. Brycer will collect all fees due and payable by third party inspectors in connection with activities relating to the Solution.

3. Brycer Responsibilities: During the Term, Brycer shall be responsible for the following in connection with Client’s use of the Solution:

 Availability. Brycer shall make the Solution available to Client as set forth on Exhibit B. The maintenance schedule and minimum service levels for the Solution are set forth on Exhibit B.  Service Level. Brycer shall provide commercially reasonable levels of customer service with respect to the Solution to all third parties who transact business with Client and access the Solution.  Backup. Brycer shall backup the database used in connection with the Solution to a separate server located within the same web hosting firm which the Solution is being hosted on a real time basis. Upon request by Client or made prior to or within 60 days after the effective date of termination of the Term, Brycer will make available to Client a complete and secure (i.e. encrypted and appropriately authenticated) download file of

2232885/3/13399.000

Client data in XML format including all schema and attachments in their native format. Brycer shall maintain appropriate administrative, physical and technical safeguards for protection of the security, confidentiality and integrity of Client data. Brycer shall not (a) modify Client data or (b) disclose Client data except as required by law.  Retention of Information. Brycer will maintain all information entered into the database by third party inspectors for at least five (5) years from the time such information is entered into the database.  Notices. Brycer will be responsible for generating and delivering the following notices to third parties in connection with the Solution: (a) reminders of upcoming inspections that are due; (b) notices that an inspection is past due; and (c) notices of completed inspection reports which contain one or more deficiencies.  Call Center Phone calls by Brycer on behalf of the Client to the property for EACH life-safety system overdue for service based on dates automatically tracked within the TCE database. Brycer is not an agent of the Client and all scripts for the overdue calls will be approved by the Client.  Updates and Enhancements. In the event Brycer releases any updates, corrections, or enhancements to the Solution during the Term, Brycer shall promptly provide such updates or corrections to Client free of any charge or fee.

4. Client Responsibilities: During the Term, Client shall be responsible for the following in connection with Client’s use of the Solution:

 Operating System. Client shall be solely responsible for providing a proper operating environment, including computer hardware or other equipment and software, for any portion of the Solution installed on the Client’s equipment (the “Client Access Software”) and for the installation of network connections to the Internet. In addition to any other Client Access Software requirements, Client must use version Internet Explorer 11.0, Edge, Firefox version 37, Chrome 40 or Safari 7.1 (or more recent versions), in addition to having a .pdf reader installed on machines to view attachments.  Training. Client shall allow Brycer at Client’s facilities to train all applicable personnel of Client on the use of the Solution.  Information. Client shall promptly provide Brycer with all appropriate information necessary for Brycer to create the database for the Solution, including without limitation: (a) all commercial building addresses within [jurisdiction] for Brycer’s initial upload; and (b) quarterly updates to in a format acceptable to Brycer in its discretion.  Enforcement. Client shall take all actions necessary to require in writing (e.g. resolution, ordinance, fire policy, code amendment) the use of the Solution by third party inspection companies.  Reports. Client will require all compliant and deficient test results to be submitted.

5. Ownership of Data. Client owns all the data provided by Client and received from third party contractors for Client. Brycer shall maintain appropriate administrative, physical and technical safeguards for protection of the security, confidentiality and integrity of Client’s data.

Please acknowledge your acceptance of this proposal and our standard Terms and Conditions by counter-signing this proposal below. We look forward to a long-term and mutually beneficial relationship with you.

2232885/3/13399.000

Brycer, LLC

By: Its: President Acknowledged and Agreed to this ___ day of ______, 20____:

[CLIENT]

By: Its:

2232885/3/13399.000

Exhibit A

Terms and Conditions

Any capitalized terms not defined in these Terms and Conditions shall have the meaning assigned to it in that certain Letter Agreement attached hereto by and between Brycer, LLC and Client (the “Agreement).

1. Restrictions on Use. Client shall not copy, distribute, create developed by receiving party without use of any Confidential derivative works of or modify the Solution in any way. Client Information. At the termination of this Agreement, each party agrees that: (a) it shall only permit its officers and employees will return the other party all Confidential Information of the (collectively, the “Authorized Users”) to use the Solution for the other party. Each party also agrees that it shall not duplicate, benefit of Client; (b) it shall use commercially reasonable translate, modify, copy, printout, disassemble, decompile or efforts to prevent the unauthorized use or disclosure of the otherwise tamper with any Confidential Information of the other Solution; (c) it shall not sell, resell, rent or lease the Solution; party or any firmware, circuit board or software provided (d) it shall not use the Solution to store or transmit infringing or therewith. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties otherwise unlawful or tortious material, or to store or transmit acknowledge that Client shall be permitted to comply with any material in violation of third party rights; (e) it shall not all federal and state laws concerning disclosure. interfere with or disrupt the integrity or performance of the Solution or third-party data contained therein; and (f) it shall not 7. Brycer Warranty. Brycer represents and warrants to Client that reverse engineer, translate, disassemble, decompile or otherwise Brycer has all rights necessary in and to any patent, copyright, attempt to create any source code which is derived from the trademark, service mark or other intellectual property right used Solution. Client is responsible for all actions taken by the in, or associated with, the Solution, and that Brycer is duly Authorized Users in connection with the Solution. authorized to enter into this Agreement and provide the Solution to Client pursuant to this Agreement. 2. Proprietary Rights. All right, title and interest in and to the Solution and any and all derivative works or modifications 8. Disclaimer. All information entered into Brycer’s database is thereof (the “Derivative Works”), and any accompanying produced by third party inspectors and their agents. documentation, manuals or other materials used or supplied THEREFORE, BRYCER SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS under this Agreement or with respect to the Solution or ANY REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY AS TO THE Derivative Works (the “Documentation”), and any ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY reproductions works made thereof, remain with Brycer. Client INFORMATION ENTERED INTO BRYCER’S shall not remove any product identification or notices of such DATABASE BY EITHER CLIENT OR THIRD PARTY proprietary rights from the Solution. Client acknowledges and INSPECTORS. EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 7, agrees that, except for the limited use rights established BRYCER MAKES NO OTHER WARRANTY, EXPRESS hereunder, Client has no right, title or interest in the Solution, OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE SOLUTION OR the Derivative Works or the Documentation. ANY OTHER INFORMATION AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, 3. Independent Contractor. Nothing in the Agreement may be ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT construed or interpreted as constituting either party hereto as the LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF agent, principal, employee or joint venturer of the other. Each MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A of Client and Brycer is an independent contractor. Neither may PARTICULAR PURPOSE. BRYCER'S SOLE LIABILITY assume, either directly or indirectly, any liability of or for the FOR BREACH OF THE REPRESENTATION AND other party. Neither party has the authority to bind or obligate WARRANTY SET FORTH IN SECTION 7, AND the other party and neither party may represent that it has such CLIENT'S SOLE REMEDY, SHALL BE THAT BRYCER authority. SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD RECIPIENT HARMLESS FROM AND AGAINST ANY LOSS, SUIT, 4. Reservation of Rights. Brycer reserves the right, in its sole DAMAGE, CLAIM OR DEFENSE ARISING OUT OF discretion and with prior notice to Client, to discontinue, add, BREACH OF THE REPRESENTATION AND adapt, or otherwise modify any design or specification of the WARRANTY. Solution and/or Brycer’s policies, procedures, and requirements specified or related hereto. All rights not expressly granted to 9. LIMITATION ON DAMAGES. EXCEPT AS Client are reserved to Brycer, including the right to provide all OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN SECTION 7, IN NO EVENT or any part of the Solution to other parties. SHALL BRYCER BE LIABLE FOR OR OBLIGATED IN ANY MANNER FOR SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR 5. Use of Logos. During the term of this Agreement, Brycer shall INDIRECT DAMAGES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT have the right to use Client’s logos for the purpose of providing LIMITED TO, LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF PROFITS OR the Solution to Client. SYSTEM DOWNTIME. CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT IN NO CASE SHALL BRYCER 'S 6. Confidential Information. Brycer and Client acknowledge and LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSS OF DATA OR DATA agree that in providing the Solution, Brycer and Client, as the INTEGRITY EXCEED THE REPLACEMENT COST OF case may be, may disclose to the other party certain THE MEDIA ON WHICH THE DATA WAS STORED. confidential, proprietary trade secret information ("Confidential Information"). Confidential Information may include, but is not 10. Risks Inherent to Internet. Client acknowledges that: (a) the limited to, the Solution, computer programs, flowcharts, Internet is a worldwide network of computers, (b) diagrams, manuals, schematics, development tools, communication on the Internet may not be secure, (c) the specifications, design documents, marketing information, Internet is beyond the control of Brycer, and (d) Brycer does not financial information or business plans. Each party agrees that own, operate or manage the Internet. Client also acknowledges it will not, without the express prior written consent of the other that there are inherent risks associated with using the Solution, party, disclose any Confidential Information or any part thereof including but not limited to the risk of breach of security, the to any third party. Confidential Information excludes risk of exposure to computer viruses and the risk of interception, information: (a) that is or becomes generally available to the distortion, or loss of communications. Client assumes these public through no fault of the receiving party; (b) that is risks knowingly and voluntarily and indemnifies and holds rightfully received by the receiving party from a third party Brycer harmless from all liability from all such risks. Not in without limitation as to its use; or (c) that is independently limitation of the foregoing, Client hereby assumes the risk, and

2232885/3/13399.000

Brycer shall have no responsibility or liability of any kind facsimile or electronic mail, when such notice is transmitted and hereunder, for: (1) errors in the Solution resulting from misuse, confirmation of receipt obtained; (c) if mailed by certified mail, negligence, revision, modification, or improper use of all or any postage prepaid, to the last known address of each party, three part of the Solution by any entity other than Brycer or its business days after mailing; or (d) if delivered to a nationally authorized representatives; (2) any version of the Solution other recognized overnight courier service, one business day after than the then-current unmodified version provided to Client; (3) delivery. Client's failure to timely or correctly install any updates to the Client Access Software; (4) problems caused by connecting or 17. Assignment. The Agreement may not be assigned or transferred failure to connect to the Internet; (5) failure to provide and by Client without the prior written consent of Brycer and any maintain the technical and connectivity configurations for the purported transfer in violation of this section shall be null and use and operation of the Solution that meet Brycer’s void. The Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the recommended requirements; (6) nonconformities resulting from benefit of the parties thereto and their respective successors and or problems to or caused by non-Brycer products or services; or representatives. (7) data or data input, output, accuracy, and suitability, which shall be deemed under Client’s exclusive control. 18. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. THE AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN 11. Indemnity. Each party (the “Indemnifying Party”) will defend ACCORDANCE WITH, AND ENFORCEABLE UNDER, and indemnify the non-indemnifying party against any damages, THE LAWS OF THE STATE IN WHICH CLIENT EXISTS losses, liabilities, causes of action, costs or expenses (including APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS MADE IN SUCH STATE reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising from the Indemnifying AND THAT ARE TO BE WHOLLY PERFORMED IN SUCH Party’s breach of this Agreement, gross negligence or STATE WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE CHOICE-OF- intentional misconduct. Client will defend and indemnify LAW PRINCIPLES OF SUCH STATE. THE PARTIES Brycer against any damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses IRREVOCABLY AGREE THAT ALL ACTIONS OR (including reasonable attorneys’ fees), claims, demands, suits or PROCEEDINGS IN ANY WAY, MANNER OR RESPECT proceedings made or brought against Brycer by a third party in ARISING OUT OF OR FROM OR RELATED TO THE connection with Client’s or an Authorized User’s use of the AGREEMENT SHALL BE LITIGATED ONLY IN COURTS Solution, or any action or inaction taken by a third party, LOCATED WITHIN THE STATE IN WHICH CLIENT including, but not limited to, third party inspectors, in EXISTS. THE PARTIES HEREBY CONSENT AND connection with such third party providing services for Client or SUBMIT TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF ANY otherwise at Client’s or an Authorized User’s request or LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL COURT LOCATED WITHIN direction. Client’s duty of defend and indemnify are subject to SAID STATE. THE PARTIES HEREBY WAIVE ANY the limitations and immunities in Minnesota Statute Chapter RIGHTS THEY MAY HAVE TO TRANSFER OR CHANGE 466 which are incorporated herein. VENUE OF ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT. THE PARTIES WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY 12. Breach. Brycer shall have the right to terminate or suspend this ON ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING TO ENFORCE OR Agreement, and all of Client’s rights hereunder, immediately DEFEND ANY RIGHTS UNDER THE AGREEMENT, AND upon delivering written notice to Client detailing Client’s AGREE THAT ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING breach of any provision of this Agreement. If Client cures such SHALL BE TRIED BEFORE A COURT AND NOT BEFORE breach within 5 days of receiving written notice thereof, Brycer A JURY. shall restore the Solution and Client shall pay any fees or costs incurred by Brycer in connection with the restoration of the Solution. 19. Entire Agreement. The Agreement sets out the entire agreement between the parties relative to the subject matter hereof and 13. Illegal Payments. Client acknowledges and agrees that it has supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements or not received or been offered any illegal or improper bribe, representations, oral or written. kickback, payment, gift or anything of value from any employee or agent of Brycer in connection with the Agreement. 20. Amendment. The Agreement may not be altered or modified, except by written amendment which expressly refers to the 14. Beneficiaries. There are no third party beneficiaries to the Agreement and which is duly executed by authorized Agreement. representatives of both parties. The waiver or failure by either party to exercise or enforce any right provided for in the 15. Force Majeure. Neither party shall be responsible for any Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any further right failure to perform due to unforeseen, non-commercial under the Agreement. Any provision of the Agreement held to circumstances beyond its reasonable control, including but not be invalid under applicable law shall not render the Agreement limited to acts of God, war, riot, embargoes, acts of civil or invalid as a whole, and in such an event, such provision shall be military authorities, fire, floods, earthquakes, blackouts, interpreted so as to best accomplish the intent of the parties accidents, or strikes. In the event of any such delay, any within the limits of applicable law. The Agreement may be applicable period of time for action by said party may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts, each of which shall deferred for a period of time equal to the time of such delay, be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute except that a party's failure to make any payment when due one and the same instrument. hereunder shall not be so excused. 21. Expiration. The rights and obligations contained in these Terms 16. Notices. All notices required in the Agreement shall be and Conditions shall survive any expiration or termination of effective: (a) if given personally, upon receipt; (b) if given by the Agreement.

2232885/3/13399.000

Exhibit B

Maintenance Schedule and Minimum Service Levels

1. Uptime and Maintenance.

The Solution shall be available 24 hours per day during the term of this Agreement. The Solution shall be fully functional, timely and accessible by Client at least 99.5% of the time or better and Brycer shall use reasonable efforts to provide Client with advance notice of any unscheduled downtime.

2. Response Time.

Brycer shall respond to telephone calls from Client within two hours of the call and/or message and all emails from Client within two hours of the receipt of the email.

3. Customer Support

Customer support hours are 24/7/365. The toll free number is 1-855-279-2371

Brycer will assign client a dedicated customer representative with direct access to their email and work number.

CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: IV.D.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Scott Neal, City Manager Item Activity: North Ramp Expansion: Request to Waive Building Action Subject: Permit Fees

ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize staff to waive building permit and related City-fees for the North Parking Ramp Expansion at 3930 to 3944 Market Street.

INTRODUCTION: This item pertains to the expansion of North Parking Ramp located at 3930-3944 Market Street. This ramp serves the general public at 50th and France. It is scheduled for expansion in 2018. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Staff Report Waive Permit Fees

November 21, 2017

Mayor and Council Members

Scott Neal, City Manager

North Parking Ramp Expansion – Request to Waive Building Permit Fees

Information / Background: The City’s Building Department charges permit and plan review fees to generate revenue that offsets the costs of staff who provide services to the project. The City typically pays building permit fees for building construction projects that it owns. An exception is proposed to this typical policy. Like the other public parking facilities at the 50 th and France Commercial Area, the North Ramp is owned by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The HRA is a separate, but closely related entity of the City of Edina. The typical building permit fees are requested to be waived for this project. The Edina HRA intends to expand the existing parking facility next year. Construction is anticipated to begin on or about January 2, 2018 and be completed in late September 2018. A portion of the building will be reopened in April 2018 so that it can be used by customers and employees. The scope of this project includes the addition of one additional level of structured parking, expansions to the east and west on vacant parcels owned by the HRA and a variety of miscellaneous repairs needed to the existing structure. When complete, the North Parking Ramp will provide more than 500 parking stalls for the shared use of employees, customers and clients of 50 th and France businesses. The expansion will include a second elevator, two art features, streetscape improvements and two “gray box” shells that will be sold to a private developer for completion. The estimated construction cost for the project is $10.7 million, including architecture and engineering fees and construction administration. The estimated cost of building permit fees and plan review fees is $63,195.41. These fees are recommended to be waived so that the public investment can be focused on deliverable outcomes and limiting the total project cost. This request does not waive other fees applied by entities other than the City of Edina. Nor does it waive any fees required of the private developer for the adjacent mixed-use building. The fees required for the future developer and tenant build-out of the gray box retail spaces are also not waived. After discussing this request with the Public Works Director and Chief Building Official, I am recommending the City Council waive the building permit and plan review fees for the expansion of the North Parking Ramp located at 3930-3944 Market Street. END CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: IV.E.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject: Approve Traffic Safety Report of October 4, 2017 Action

ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Report of October 4, 2017.

INTRODUCTION: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the October 4, 2017 Traffic Safety Report at their October 26 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Staff Report: Traffic Safety Report of October 4, 2017 DRAFT Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission October 26, 2017

November 21, 2017

Mayor and City Council

Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator

Traffic Safety Report of October 4th, 2017

Information / Background:

The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 4. The Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Police Lieutenant, City Engineer, Public Works Director and Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this meeting. The Traffic Safety Specialist was not able to attend and was informed of the decisions and did not object to the recommendations.

For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included on the October 26 Edina Transportation Commission and the November 21 City Council meeting agendas.

Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action:

A1. Request to change current ‘No Parking’ signage on School Rd

• A school employee is requesting to change the restricted times to the current signs on the south side of School Rd • Concord Elementary School has an entrance at School Road • The north side of school road restricts parking, as the south side restricts parking during school days from 8 am to 4 pm • Concord Elementary changed school start times later in the day, which now allows parents to park at 4 pm on the south side of School Road prior to buses departing Concord Elementary • The width of School Road is 23’ STAFF REPORT Page 2

After review, staff recommends changing the No Parking signs near Concord Elementary to restrict parking from 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM. Changing the time of the parking restrictions will raise the safety of school buses and students in this area.

Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action:

B1. Request to limit parking on Doncaster Way • A resident wants to further restrict parking along Doncaster Way • Doncaster Way restricts parking on the east-side of the street at Weekdays from 5 pm-9 pm • Doncaster Way is 29’ wide • Doncaster Way is located on the east side of Highlands Park • Highlands Park hosts evening and weekend events which include youth soccer and football

After review, staff recommends no action. Doncaster already has restricted parking on the east side of the street and further restriction at Highlands Park does not appear to be necessary.

B2. Request for crosswalks in both directions at the intersection of W 56th St and Xerxes Ave • Residents requesting a crosswalk at this intersection stating a crosswalk will increase pedestrian awareness • Xerxes Ave borders Minneapolis • Xerxes is a two-lane Hennepin County Road which is classified as a ‘Collector Street’ • W 56th St is classified as a ‘Local Street’ • This intersection is controlled with an all- way stop • The East side of Xerxes Ave includes a gas station, a salon, a dry cleaning store and a restaurant • This intersection has a north and southbound bus stop (route 6) • North and Southbound crosses totaled 168 pedestrians with a two-hour peak of 45 crosses at 6:15 PM STAFF REPORT Page 3

• East and Westbound crosses totaled 202 pedestrians with a two-hour peak of 77 crosses at 6:00 PM • All data was collected and averaged from a two-day collection period

After review, staff recommends no action. Staff was informed Hennepin County and the City of Minneapolis were not in favor of adding crosswalks to the current all-way stop at this intersection.

B3. Request to add ‘No Parking’ on Concord Terrace • A resident who lives on Concord Terrace is requesting to restrict parking on one side of the street • Parking is currently allowed on both sides of Concord Terrace • Vehicles are parking on both sides of the street during youth and high school football events • On-street parking is taking place mostly during late afternoons/evenings from Thursdays-Saturdays during the late Summer into Fall seasons • The width of Concord Terrace is 26’6”

After review, staff recommends no action. The request was to restrict parking when EHS hosts varsity football games. Staff does not believe restricting parking in this neighborhood is necessary for such a small amount of events in a year.

B4. Request to add all-way stop signs at W 44th St and Brookside Ave • A resident who lives near this intersection is requesting an all-way stop control at this intersection • This intersection is controlled with a stop sign for westbound traffic on W 44th St at Brookside Ave • W 44th St runs east and westbound as a Collector road • Brookside Ave is a north and southbound Collector road • Vehicles traveling on Brookside Ave is not stop-controlled • In 2016 W 44th St has an ADT of 4,019 • Brookside Ave had and ADT of 2,544 in 2014 • There have been two registered crashes in this location within the last five years of data • Brookside Ave exceeds 300 vehicles entering the intersection six times • W 44th St exceeds 200 vehicles entering the intersection three times STAFF REPORT Page 4

After review, staff recommends no action. This intersection does not meet warrants to become all-way controlled.

Section C: Items which staff recommends for further study

C1. Request to change current on-street parking on Edgebrook Place • Edgebrook Pl is a one-way street in the Country Club Neighborhood • Parking is currently allowed on the right side of the street • The width of Edgebrook is 17’6” • Vehicles traveling on Edgebrook are driving onto the boulevard at 4616 Browndale Ave causing ruts and chipping a tree to get around parked vehicles on the north end of Edgebrook

After review, staff recommends sending a letter to affected neighbors asking for their feedback towards further restricted parking along Edgebrook Place.

C2. Request to increase turning restrictions onto Chapel Lane • A resident who lives along Chapel Drive believes eastbound vehicles on Valley View Rd are using Chapel Lane and Chapel Drive as a cut-thru during evening rush hours • This resident is requesting to limit right turns from Valley View Drive onto Chapel Lane during even rush hours • Currently, there are afternoon right turn restrictions onto Chapel Lane between 3:10-3:40 pm • Fall 2017 data shows the peak evening rush hour for southbound traffic at Chapel lane is 34 cars at 1:30 pm

After review, staff recommends further study prior to any recommendation. The City has been in discussions with Edina Public Schools regarding a transportation study once all construction is completed. With the current information, staff is under the impression this issue does not warrant any additional turn restrictions on Valley View Rd.

Section D: Other Traffic Safety Items Handled

D1. Request to move Share the Road signs on Olinger as they were in the clear-sight area. After inspecting the signs along Olinger Blvd, it was recommended the Sign Department to move the two signs between properties to stay out of Edina’s clear-view ordinance. STAFF REPORT Page 5

D2. A resident requested clearing rock from a sidewalk outside of Holiday Gas station off Interlachen Blvd. The rock was making it difficult for pedestrians with ailments to travel safely on the sidewalk. After inspection, the rock was cleared.

D3. Resident requested a Walk Request button to be fixed at a traffic signal at W 51st St and France Avenue. This was forwarded as the traffic signal is under the jurisdiction of the City of Minneapolis.

D4. A resident requested increased police enforcement at the intersection of W 58th St and Beard Ave. The resident stated vehicles are speeding and failing to stop at the all-way stop. This request was forwarded to the EPD.

D5. A request was made to change the traffic signal timing at W 77th St and Minnesota Dr. Eastbound traffic from W 77th St are restricted from turning left onto Parklawn Ave causing backups onto W 77th St. This is leading drivers to illegally turn left onto Parklawn Ave into oncoming traffic. This request was forwarded to the City of Bloomington, as they own and maintain these traffic signals.

D6. A resident was requesting to place ‘No Bicycles Beyond This Point’ signs along Rosland Park’s pedestrian paths. This request was discussed and was a ‘C Item’ in the September 2017 Traffic Safety Report. It was decided to discuss this item with the Parks Department. The Parks Department is in favor of and will be adding signs at necessary locations.

D7. A resident was requesting additional ‘No Thru Traffic’ signs at 7th St South as vehicles turn south onto Lincoln Circle during the HWY 169 bridge closure project. Staff was confident with current signs in place and the opening of the HWY 169 bridge over Ninemile Creek, this request was denied.

STAFF REPORT Page 6

Appendix A: All-Way Stop Warrants

Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal.

The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in Section 2B.4 also apply to multi-way stop applications. The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but 3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.

D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.

Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Draft Minutes ☒ Approved Minutes ☐ Approved Date:

Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Mayors Conference Room October 26, 2017, 6:00 p.m.

I. Call To Order Vice Chair Miranda called the meeting to order.

II. Roll Call Answering roll call were commissioners Ahler, Iyer, Kane, Ma, Miranda, Olson, Richman, and Ruthruff. Absent: Commissioners LaForce and Yeager.

III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by commissioner Richman and seconded by commissioner Ahler approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye . Motion carried .

IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by commissioner Ruthruff approving the amended September 28, 2017, minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried.

V. Community Comments Ms. Gayle Castro, 5217 Doncaster Way, said she has been working with traffic safety coordinator Bauler about parking on Doncaster Way by the park. She said it gets out of control when there are sporting events and submitted a photo to demonstrate. She said a portion of Glengarry Parkway, on the other side of the park, has no parking signs, and she suggested doing the same on Doncaster Way to force park patrons to use the parking lot.

Mr. Steve Schwantes, 4412 Brookside Avenue, said the projects on Highways 100 and 169 increased traffic in his neighborhood and his concerns are increased daily traffic and speeding. He said he has been working with traffic safety coordinator Bauler and he’s since learned that his request for a 2-way stop sign at W. 44 th Street and Brookside Avenue would not meet warrants. He said there is a stop sign at Division Avenue and Brookside Avenue that would not meet warrants today. Instead of stop signs, he requested a permanent radar sign like the one that was recently installed on Interlachen Boulevard. He said data shows the 85 th percentile speed to be 33-34 mph. He said the area is underserved by the police.

VI. Reports/Recommendations E. Traffic Safety Report of October 4, 2017 B.1. Planner Nolan explained that if they installed no parking signs, drivers would simply find another street to park on. Discussion ensued about what could be done and they concluded that there was no adequate solution.

B.4. Leave as is and planner Nolan will talk with staff about the resident’s new request.

Motion was made by commissioner Ruthruff and seconded by commissioner Olson to forward the TSC report of October 4, 2017, to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried.

CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: IV.F.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Accept Interactive Musical Instrument Donation from Action Subject: Rotary Club of Edina

ACTION REQUESTED: Accept interactive musical instrument donation from the Rotary Club of Edina.

INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report and restricted donation agreement. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Staff Report: Accept Interactive Musical Instrument Donation from Rotary Club of Edina Restricted Donation Agreement

Nov. 21, 2017

Mayor and City Council

Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director

Accept Interactive Musical Instrument Donation from Rotary Club of Edina

Information / Background: Every year, the Rotary Club of Edina raises money at a fall fundraiser to support community projects and awards grants. This year the Rotary Club has selected to give the Edina Parks & Recreation Department a $10,000 grant for the purchase of interactive musical instruments that will be installed at Rosland Park near the playground. Staff will select the interactive instruments and determine the best location for the installation upon council approval of the donation.

Staff recommends approval as a restricted donation per the City of Edina’s Donation, Sponsorship and Advertising Policy. City Attorney, Roger Knutson, prepared a Restricted Donation Agreement attached to the staff report.

CITY OF EDINA

RESTRICTED DONATION AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT made this day of , 2017 by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation ("City"), whose address is 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and Rotary Club of Edina Inc., a Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation ("Donor"), whose address is do Patti Solheim, 5101 Vernon Ave. S. , Suite 501, Edina, Minnesota 55436.

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of their mutual covenants the parties agree as follows:

I. APPROVAL. This Agreement is contingent upon the City Council adopting a resolution pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 accepting the donation subject to the terms of this Agreement.

2. DONATION. The Donor donates $10,000 to the City for the purchase and installation by the City for interactive musical instruments at Rosland Park in the City of Edina. The City must install the interactive musical instruments by June 30, 2018.

6. NAMING. A plaque will be installed by the City adjacent to the installation to recognize the donation.

7. MAINTENANCE. The donation shall be maintained by the City of Edina. Maintenance includes regular inspection, cleaning and minor repairs.

8. DECOMMISSIONING. The donation may be decommissioned based on the following reasons at the City's discretion:

a. The donated item has reached the end of its useful life.

b. The donated item is damaged to a point where repair becomes financially burdensome to the City.

1 194696v1 c. The City Council determines that the site is needed for another public use.

CITY OF EDINA

BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor

AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager

ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA, INC.

BY: Name: Saturo Asato Title: President

2 194696v1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.A.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Kaylin Eidsness, Senior Communications Coordinator Item Activity:

Subject: October Speak Up, Edina: Building Heights Information

ACTION REQUESTED: No action requested.

INTRODUCTION: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. Since January 2014, organized monthly discussions have been held on the site.

As part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update, required by the Metropolitan Council, the City of Edina is reviewing building heights that are listed within the existing commercial districts of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The current Comprehensive Plan is clear regarding building height limits within commercial areas. However, City staff has been grappling with development proposals that do not currently fit within the building height parameters of the current Comprehensive Plan. All building height proposals that do not fit within the existing Comprehensive Plan require amendments to the plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Metropolitan Council. Note that the Metropolitan Council does not require height limits, or any indications of height parameters, as part of Comprehensive Plan submission. The City is looking to review how height is handled in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update and sought input from residents on the following questions:

Currently in the 44th & France area, the building height is limited to two stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why? Currently in the 50th & France area, the building height is limited between four and six stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why? Currently in the 70th & Cahill area, the building height is limited between two and four stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why? Currently in the Southdale area, the building height is limited between four and 12 stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why? Currently in the Grandview area, the building height is limited to six stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why?

The discussion was open for comments between Sept. 23 and Oct. 31. During that time, 194 comments were made. Additionally, 1,565 users visited the site, garnering 8,677 page views.

ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

October 2017 Speak Up Discussion SUE Presentation Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes 124 5 194 36 158 PARTICIPANTS TOPICS ANSWERS REPLIES VOTES

SUMMARY OF TOPICS

GRANDVIEW AREA 13 Answers · 2 Replies Currently in the Grandview area, the building height is limited to six stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why?

Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Sep 23, 2017 12:03 am 4 Votes

This is a unique site where the area is much lover than the elevation along Vernon. It does not abut a residential area so the building level can be six stories without towering over the buildings on Vernon. Again the issue is not the number of floors but that the site is developed to have a overall aesthetically pleasing effect.

Response: Andrea Flom · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 08, 2017 9:04 am Totally agree

Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 28, 2017 11:50 pm 4 Votes

I think the factor in Grandview to consider is traffic congestion. I think 6 stories is adequate and adding more creates density that again cannot be supported by infrastructure. Traffic along Gleason/Vernon is backed up every day from 62 as it is. Higher buildings create more density which results in congestion. There is also already congestion on Interlachen and 50th. Those are both major thoroughfares in and out. Add that to traffic congestion from the development to and from 50th and France, and you create a parking lot on that entire strip. To remove or increase building height restrictions is not adequate planning. We need to focus on the big picture in the long term. Grandview is an area that can be reviewed on a case by case basis if a proposal incorporated with the long term and infrastructure makes sense. Let's not change the building height restrictions at this time. That's putting the cart before the horse.

greta simondet · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Sep 29, 2017 1:57 pm 4 Votes

Six stories or less. Traffic is already an issue around there at certain times of day.

1 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Paul Nelson · Admin · (Postal Code: 55439) · Oct 03, 2017 2:03 pm 2 Votes

As development occurs in this neighborhood, I feel that density is more important than building height. However since this question relates directly to exacting a number for height, I'd suggest that with the uneven topography of the area that other buildings be held to the ultimate (absolute) height of the Jerry's tower. As I don't know the exact elevations of the former PW site, this could relate to a 10 story building on that site.

Response: Sharon G · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 26, 2017 4:56 pm Keeping new development at a maximum height of the current Jerry's tower is a great idea. I'd be fine with less than that in order to retain wide vistas / sense of space.

Bill Owens · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 08, 2017 10:20 am 3 Votes

4 stories max!

Bernie Beaver · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 09, 2017 6:55 am 0 Votes

Traffic management is more important than building height

John Buttolph · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 09, 2017 12:25 pm 3 Votes

I cannot support any increase in height/density increase in Grandview without corresponding improvements in the circulation element. How does the City propose to manage the traffic congestion in this area - which is already borderline problematic ?

Jon DeMars Victorsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 29, 2017 7:05 pm 0 Votes

How can you embrace a neighborhood name like "Grandview" and restrict the height of the buildings? Parts of this area have a high elevation and such a fantastic view of the Minneapolis skyline!

K.B. Montgomery · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 31, 2017 6:13 pm 1 Votes

My concern with the Grandview topic centers on 3 main points:

-Regard (or disregard) for public process/input -Building for live-ability including walk-ability, bike-ability and multi-modality

2 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

-Retention of small, unique area businesses

Residents collectively spent thousands of volunteer hours to guide future development in the area, thus creating a vision of the kind of neighborhood center in which they would want to live. Here is a brief history of Grandview area planning:

1. Using consultants, the city has conducted at least 4 public processes (more if you count the Transportation Study and TIF Study conducted by Mike Fischer’s company LHB) costing over $500K. 2. In 2012, the Council unanimously approved a document called the Grandview District Development Framework (Framework: all pages referenced are from that document). 3. The Framework emphasized developing the area as a neighborhood center (page 13) with a catalytic public facility on the former public works site (page 25) 4. Primary emphasis was put on walkability, bike-ability and connectivity of the area (guiding principle #6 and pages 3 and 25) 5. The former school bus garage site was anticipated as a low-density retail/service/office site fostering better connectivity from the Grandview Square site to and through Jerry’s. 6. Photos throughout the document displayed attractive low buildings (no more than 4 stories) lining Eden and Arcadia (pages 18, 19, 23, et al)

The recent city council approval of the 6-story, luxury Trammell Crow apartment building on the former school bus garage site ignores the Grandview Framework. One important example is the building’s impact on walkability in the area. Walk and bike-ability are an afterthought with the anticipated TC project. Rather than the promised safe walking zone between the Library/Senior Center/Grandview Square and Jerry’s, the project calls for a striped and signalized cross walk described as dangerous, from the cars making a turn from Vernon to Eden Avenue. Furthermore, patrons of GV Square will have to traverse a sidewalk from along the west side of the new apartment building that, according to one of the Trammell Crow consultants, will dump them into Jerry’s parking lot.

The project required Comprehensive Plan variances for zoning, height and density. I reference this in my 44th and France Speak Up post. When the council gives variances for height and density, they increase the value of the underlying land. That, in turn, makes the land more valuable and incents landowners to sell. When landowners sell, it often has the impact of forcing unique, small businesses out of the neighborhood. In their place come chain stores that draw more traffic and have less unique appeal. Already, a developer has bought the property (the same developer who is developing the Edina Cleaners site). He has doubled the rent of the small businesses thus forcing them to leave the area. The council bears responsibility for forcing small businesses out of the area by incenting land sales and not creating policies to save them.

I often wonder why this council and staff have difficultly both creating and adhering to planning processes that result in inspiring places that we all want to live, work and play. I got a glimpse into the reason when I attended an all day Urban Land Institute “visioning” seminar for Edina city staff and officials (with some citizen guests). Teams were assigned to create the infill development for a fictional town. For context, the Urban Land Institute is made up in large part by area developers and consultants.

We were split into competing teams. Our success was measured on the basis of the developer and city profitability. The developer profitability was focused over a 3- year term. While some attention was given to area assets like green space and affordable housing, there were no metrics measuring the live-ability, walk-ability, bike-ability. There

3 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

were no points given for attracting and retaining small area businesses. In fact, quite the opposite was true, there were substantial incentives for adding an 80K Square Foot “Q Mart” or a 40K square foot supermarket. There were no incentives for smaller bricks and mortar stores aligned with today’s shopping patterns. There were no incentives for creating attractively designed buildings and public spaces.

Edina’s current development patterns align perfectly with what we experienced in the ULI seminar. It explains, to a great degree, the mediocre, one-off development we are seeing in Edina.

Edina can do better. As Dan Buettner says in his list of the top 25 happiest U.S. cities: “There is a genesis [to developing happy cities]. Enlightened leaders make conscious decisions to favor quality of life over economic development or political expediency.”

stephanie mullaney · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 31, 2017 6:47 pm 0 Votes

What does there appear to be a NEED for increased density in all of these small area plans? Four stories max. Most people I know want their Edina neighborhoods to stay NEIGHBORHOODS, not commerce and business centers. The traffic in this area is congested at rush hour, and the transportation study the city funded a couple of years back didn't come up with anything to relieve that situation. Make the area more WALKER, BIKING friendly, not attract car traffic and more congestion.

Sharon G · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 31, 2017 6:50 pm 0 Votes

It is so discouraging when city officials pretend to listen to residents but really don't. Why are they even asking this question if they have already given Trammel Crow permission to go 6 stories in that area. Shouldn't they have done this survey before approving that?

SOUTHDALE AREA 74 Answers · 14 Replies Currently in the Southdale area, the building height is limited between four and 12 stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why?

Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Sep 22, 2017 7:11 pm 15 Votes

I previously serve on the Southdale planning group representing a small neighborhood of high density housing nest to the Southdale Medical Distict. A single road - Barrie - which turns into Heritage Drive - serves the area. We have the heaviest traffic of any street in Edina without sidewalks, dangerous as parking is heavy on both sides of the road and the road has many curves and driveways. Having building heights that high for all parts of the Southdale district is crazy. Our reisudential already has the Edina Towers and more high rises could be created only by tearing down existing owner occupied properties, displacing long term residents and young people attracted to affordable

4 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

housing and express buses to downtown jobs. For the Southdale area, building heights should vary through the district - higher in commercial areas, lower elsewhere. In our part of the area, anything over 3-4 stories will transform our community, not for the better. Until the city is ready to create better access, we cannot handle higher volumes.

Response: Teri Ellis · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 10, 2017 8:39 am I agree that the building heights in this area must be staggered downward toward residential homes. The height of buildings towering- where you feel residents of these high rise buildings can over look into your homes, is not something those in residential homes would not appreciate or want. This will depreciate the residential homes value, and the value of our neighborhoods. These areas must be protected!!

Kristin Reichling · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Sep 28, 2017 7:37 pm 15 Votes

Is there information regarding the effects of increased building height (density) on traffic, walkability, existing real estate usage, affordable housing, etc.? It's hard to comment on height preferences without knowing the effects of any changes. In the absence of this information, I would not support any changes to current height limits anywhere in Edina, unless they're adjusted downward. Broadly speaking, developers should present proposals consistent with our Comprehensive Plan. We shouldn't be grappling with misaligned proposals.

Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 28, 2017 11:39 pm 18 Votes

The guidelines in the existing comp plan should remain the same throughout the Southdale area. There is ample opportunity for development and leeway for building height within the existing plan. There must be specified restrictions to maintain buffer and transition zones from the commercial to residential neighborhoods. In addition, with the wide spread high density development already in play across the area, the infrastructure cannot support the traffic and congestion that will occur as a result of allowing higher density than what is already prescribed by the plan.

Kaylin Eidsness · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 29, 2017 2:30 pm 13 Votes

[Comment from Shirley Rerat] Why have a Planning Commission if developers can come in and just decide what they want? Either put building on hold until the Southdale area planning group can get a plan in place or just let people come in and do what they want to do.

They work so hard getting these plans in place, and the builders come in and they just change it.

Do it one way or the other. None of this makes any sense.

Hopefully people will think about this in all areas because this isn’t all about the Southdale area.

5 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Matthew McGivney · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Sep 30, 2017 9:57 am 18 Votes

We recently purchased a house in the Southdale area based on current comp plan limits and current zoning. We did this because we like the neighborhood, the neighbors, and the peace and quiet. Why is the city working to destroy this with extremely tall buildings, additional density and an abandonment of the comp plan? Keep to current comp plan limits and current zoning. Its a must.

Bruce McCarthy · Citizen · (Postal Code: 53189) · Sep 30, 2017 6:47 pm 18 Votes

Current height limits are appropriate but even more important than height is having a transition zone from single family homes to multi-story buildings. Without this principle in our comp plan we will get crazy things like 26 story buildings across the street from single family residences as proposed in the Estelle project. Multi-story buildings, especially high-rises, should be clustered together in the center of the Southdale area, not in a ring around Southdale.

Response: Joe Corbett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 16, 2017 11:14 am I agree, Bruce. The newer hotels adjacent to MOA could serve as an example.

Alan Solyntjes · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 01, 2017 12:40 pm 12 Votes

We have a comp plan and building codes in place. Amendments to the comp plan are currently under review. Deviating from this plan in any significant way suggests we don't have a plan. This sets a precedent for development in all parts of Edina. We should all be concerned about this and tell the Planning Commission and the City Council to abide by their agreement with residents as outlined in our plans.

Laura Lehmann · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 01, 2017 2:46 pm 17 Votes

I agree with those who have questioned the point of having a comprehensive plan if it is not being followed. If the rule is 4-12 stories, have a buffer between residential housing and commercial buildings, and transition from 4 stories on the periphery to 12 stories more centrally. And having lived here for over 25 years, there is no doubt in my mind that the traffic congestion has steadily worsened. Adding more local traffic to the thousands of cars that cut through (especially from Hwy 100 going east) will only worsen the situation.

6 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Mike Ebnet · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 02, 2017 11:46 am 15 Votes

Questions I would like to see the city answer before changing heights: What is your population goal and why? How will more people help the city? What are your plans for increasing infrastructure? How many extra firemen will be required? What kind of firefighting equipment will be needed to handle taller buildings? What is the plan for increased transportation needs? Will we need to drill more wells for water? I agree with Laura and others questioning the point of a comprehensive plan (and zoning) if you are not going to follow them.

Response: Rachel Mondry · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 02, 2017 8:20 pm I completely agree with this.... what is the city's population goal and why?

Marybeth Nelson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 06, 2017 5:15 pm 11 Votes

We have owned a home in the Centennial Lakes Village homes for 13 years. What a change adding over 1,200 apartment units to our area has made to traffic on France and York and therefore our quality of life. I walk the blinking light pedestrian crosswalk at Parkview and York regularly. At least a 5th of the time, cars do not stop/yield to pedestrians. We would not be in favor of increasing building heights and are really hoping the City of Edina will put a moratorium on any development that is going to increase density in our area. Thanks for providing this forum.

Leo Sioris · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 08, 2017 9:21 am 12 Votes

We have lived in the area since 1981. The area has become much less like the neighborhood it once was. We have enjoyed living in Edina for most all of those years, however, decisions that have been made by our planning commisions and council have made this a much less desirable neighborhood and suburb to live in. Decisions are being made for the benefit of those not living here. Building heights matter greatly. My understanding is that a comprehensive plan was put in place with neighborhood input already. Buildings along France ave should be kept in the 4-6 story range depending on where on France they are built. The traffic on France, despite what your consultants and engineers say, is not good at all. Our neighborhoods do not need more density surrounding them. Traffic is already finding its way into our neighborhoods to avoid our busy main streets. Taller buildings do not fit our environments and look ridiculous. They belong downtown, not in a neighborly suburb. Please respect the plan that has already been adopted and make decisions to make our neighborhoods better and enhance their livability. We do not need any further decrements in our living standards.

Bill Owens · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 08, 2017 10:20 am 0 Votes

12 stories max!

7 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Beth Choukalas · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 08, 2017 12:43 pm 17 Votes

Why does the city have a comprehensive plan, when it is not enforced? We did not move here to be surrounded by skyscrapers. Traffic on France Ave now is horrible and will get even worse between 62 and 494 with the proposed skyscrapers. Does the mayor or any of the council people who favor these projects live in the immediate neighborhood?

Jerry Hobbs · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 08, 2017 5:07 pm 13 Votes

The injection of an affordable housing component to the Estelle project simply muddies the water and in no way addresses the issue of Estelle's height, which appears to be a dominant concern of many of us opposed to it. An amendment tailored to raise the building height limit from 48 feet to 360 feet to benefit a particular project will nullify the concept of a transitional zone and will not pass the smell test. Let the current limitation stand.

Mary Swendsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Oct 08, 2017 10:45 pm 3 Votes

It would be great if new buildings in the Southdale Area could match the height of Point of France. The charm of Edina is the neighborhood feel that it has. High rise buildings would give it a completely different feel. A lot of work has gone into the Centennial Lakes development, and it has significantly enhanced our community. Hopefully, that same "future vision" will guide the development of the Southdale area, and protect what Edina has worked so hard to build.

RICHARD A. MINER · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 09, 2017 6:59 am 10 Votes

The Centennial Lakes development is very appealing. I fear an influx of high-rises will turn a beautiful open area into a "path through a forest" of too-tall buildings which block the view of the sky. I don't want this to become "a downtown area." Please respect the plan that has already been adopted.

Joann Russell · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 09, 2017 9:38 am 9 Votes

The existing comprehensive plan can protect the single family homes in the area while still allowing for inevitable development. Deviating from this plan to create two towers around 350' tall (taller than the water tower and the Westin) within a few hundred feet from the nearest single family home is completely incomprehensible.

Teri Ellis · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 10, 2017 10:28 am 15 Votes

My husband and I are both nearly life long East Edina residents. The density of Southdale area is becoming a great concern of ours. We both understand that development is

8 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

essential. That being said, there does not appear to us to be any serious considerations of France Ave traffic impeding into all of the surrounding neighborhoods. The France Ave, Crosstown intersection has not had a traffic upgrade in so long, we can not remember. I believe it was nearly the same when we were graduating from EHS in the 70's!! That does not make sense, with all of the medical development AND high rise residential buildings that have been going up. For those of us in surrounding areas, the noise bouncing off of said high rise buildings into the neighborhood, and the horribly increased traffic are both negatives that we have NOT heard addressed by the city. it appears to be all about the increased revenue of Southdale buildings. What about any decrease in value to neighborhoods, adjoining the Southdale area because of said noise and traffic!!! Let's also address infrastructure and long range planning. In the last several years, traffic going south bound on France Avenue are OFTEN backed up to at least W. 62nd St, and many times as I'm driving northbound on France, the south bound is past 60th ST. We keep adding high density, but there has been very little change in addressing traffic into and out of the area. Crosstown is backed up at all times of the day. We're at a point where we feel there needs to be a stop to any more added density, until the studies on impact to existing neighborhoods, infrastructure, and traffic issues- are seriously addressed!!

Marena Arbelia · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 12, 2017 2:27 pm 12 Votes

I have only lived in Edina for about 4 years. But in that time I cannot believe the amount of new building that has gone on. Don't get me wrong, updating and refreshing and welcoming new residents and businesses into our area is good. But there is a good way and a not so good way to achieve this. When I lived in Minneapolis many years ago everyone knew that Edina was careful and strict about what kind of building would be allowed to be built there so as not to change the general feeling of the suburb.However, now it seems rules are broken all the time...if developers have the money...they're in!! If Edina city planners continue on their way of thinking we will be living in another downtown Minneapolis. We will be surrounded by high-density skyscrapers...more traffic, which is already obnoxious...more pollution...more crime..more noise...more more more of things most of us DO NOT want. Do the planners actually live in or near these areas. So many other people ahead of me have voiced the same exact concerns. Please listen to us...otherwise what is the point of asking us what we think if you are going to just do what you want to anyway. Is Edina really that greedy that it's all about money? I thought it was about quality of life for everyone...living, working and shopping here. I walk everywhere and I do not want to be frightened with increased problems.

Gary Thacher · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 6:34 am 13 Votes

I have been an homeowner on Southdale Road since 1981. Responsible development has taken place over that time that has maintained the integrity of our environment. I am opposed to the variance being considered for the Estelle project due to; height, density issue. It is in direct violation of the 2008 Edina Comprehensive plan.

Sara Amaden · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 7:23 am 6 Votes

9 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

When new building was first being considered in the Southdale area, particularly along York Avenue, I attended city council meetings and asked what effect thousands of new housing units would have on traffic. The answer I got was that our roads "could handle it." That was not a very satisfactory answer since spending 10 minutes driving from 76th to the Crosstown is "handling it" but is a miserable experience. The comp plan is irrelevant; the city council simply grants variances to anyone who asks. Also, why are my property taxes going up when all this building is increasing our tax base by huge amounts?

Patty Evans · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 16, 2017 9:47 am 9 Votes

We have been Cornelia area home owners for 27 years. We strongly feel the city needs to stay with the current comprehensive plan of not allowing buildings to be built over 48 feet/ four stories tall and more than 30 units per acre. Buildings such as the ones being proposed along France are way too tall and dense for a residential neighborhood. I know of no neighborhood approval for a project of this magnitude. It was just a few years ago that we were arguing against a six story building on the corner of 72nd and France. The current proposals are obviously significantly taller and way more inappropriate for this neighborhood. In our opinion, taller buildings ( greater than four stories) should be in the area between Xerxes/York and France and not encroaching on the residential neighborhoods to the west of France. Please listen and respect the opinions of the residents of these neighborhoods.

Response: Amy Westrom · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 31, 2017 1:34 pm I live Wast of France Avenue between France and Xerxes. I don't want these tall buildings in my neighborhood any more than you do. We ALL live here in Edina, regardless of whether we are East or West of France Avenue. Please, let ALL of us continue to see the sky!

Joe Corbett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 16, 2017 9:58 am 3 Votes

Modeling what's been done with new hotels at the MOA, I believe the Southdale Area could handle taller heights directly adjacent to the mall without blocking anyone's sunlight or views. I'm concerned that even if we try to limit height, we will inevitably get the same density when it's most efficient to go up. I think that the fight over by Linden Hills corner could ultimately stifle future development. While traffic, views, etc. are important, I think it's important to consider the long-terms effects of sending developers elsewhere might be, and what the benefits of additional tax revenue might be when the schools are perpetually underfunded. Wouldn't it be nice if we got enough money from property taxes such that the schools didn't require referendums?

Response:

10 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

patricia schreiber · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 10:33 am How many homes are in the shadows of the MOA? Think about it, Joe. Where do YOU live? Several years ago, the council let go of a proposal at 7200 France because of the opposition of residents. Comments from those in favor of that project were similar to yours but thankfully the council actually listened to the tax paying neighborhood. Now, another development has come along, and as told to me by a council member himself, "it's better than what we gave up!" A developer WILL come along for this property also. A bad business decision by Bernardi should not be our problem. The new comprehensive plan MUST be put in place first.

patricia schreiber · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 11:34 am 3 Votes

Thank you for clarifying, the term adjacent was too broad! :) I appreciate your reply. Maybe like the MOA, but on a smaller scale.

carol carlson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 3:27 pm 5 Votes

Dear Joe,

Please respond to where you live. I have written the city council regarding the Estelle projects citing my concerns over increased traffic, height, revenue, light pollution, walkability, etc. It is apparent to me that changing the heights that are allowed would set a dangerous precedent for all of Edina. We have already absorbed most of the new high density housing. How much is enough?

Gary Bartolett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Oct 16, 2017 4:39 pm 5 Votes

I live in far southwest Edina and the Southdale area already feels like it has a big Keep Out sign on it. To get to the Southdale Library I have to go through 4 stop signs and 7 stop lights and fight my way down Roundy Road. I can make it to Eden Prairie which is farther away in 1 stop sign and two stop lights and get home before my pizza gets cold. Walkable is only fine if the businesses inside it can survive on the business of those close enough to walk there. The Southdale businesses clearly cannot do this so density strangles itself.

Rebecca Nye · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 16, 2017 7:51 pm 5 Votes

Our home is in the Pamela Park neighborhood close to Crosstown and France. I am opposed to building heights over four stories because of traffic, noise and density issues. The Estelle project would ruin the adjoining Cornelia neighborhood. Furthermore, it is already so difficult to get out of our neighborhood in order to do errands in the Southdale area. Please don't make it more difficult.

11 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Barb Rae · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 10:26 pm 5 Votes

Southdale used to be a 5 minute drive from West 70th Steet and Cahill. It can now take 20 minutes or more, depending on the time of day. I think the city needs to stay with the comprehensive height plan it has or risk having Edina become so congested that people will no longer see it as a desirable place to live.

Marie Sullivan · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 17, 2017 12:43 pm 4 Votes

The current zoning for no more than 4 stories should remain in place for the west side of France Avenue to preserve and protect an appropriate buffer zone between the nearby single family homes and the Southdale area development. The current zoning was well thought out and delivers the necessary aesthetic and responsible height restrictions necessary to maintain current home values and livability. The height restrictions for the east edge of France Ave. should be 6 stories or less, and heights further east between France and Xerxes should be limited to 12 and under. We are not Dallas or New York or Denver, or even Minneapolis! We are Edina and are a suburb and want to retain a smaller town feel. We should not pollute the night skies with lights, nor should we block home owners' sunshine. We should not create so much housing that our schools could not handle future enrollment. We should not create a density our aquifer cannot handle. Why build tall, luxury condos that pollute our skies and block our sun for wealthy retired people who leave their condos vacant half the year while they winter down south? The current zoning should be adhered to and the city council should stop forcing its home owners to fight to protect our well planned zoning! Let the developers know we will not be changing our zoning!

Response: Amy Westrom · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 31, 2017 1:31 pm I live east of France Avenue between France and Xerxes. I do not want 12 story buildings in my neighborhood any more than you do! Six stories, maximum.

Tom Sullivan · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 17, 2017 1:25 pm 6 Votes

To add my dissent to the Estelle project, I would like to point out that the potential change in the Comp Plan, while allowing a WAY TOO tall Estelle project to proceed, would usher in many more 24 story towers on the West side of France Avenue. This is not just a fight to repel the Estelle project, but rather a fight to keep the next 10 or 15 similar projects that will surely follow this one. Developers will be doing cartwheels of joy if the Comp Plan allows 24 stories. Say goodbye to all of the 1-4 story building on the West side of France. There will be endless construction because there will be riches for builders to realize. We must have our voices heard!!

Response:

12 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Amy Westrom · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 31, 2017 1:28 pm I live east of France Avenue between France and Xerxes. I don't want these tall buildings in my neighborhood any more than you do. Please, enough of the NIMBY. We ALL live here in Edina, regardless of whether we are East or West of France Avenue. Yes, please let our voices be heard!

Tom Sullivan · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 17, 2017 1:28 pm 6 Votes

Also, we must call the City Council staff to task when they claim there is community support for the Estelle project. They must give us an honest report on the actual pro/con tally. I have heard SCANT support for Estelle. However, I must admit, I do not talk to many real estate developers or realtors.

Ralph Zickert · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 18, 2017 11:41 am 4 Votes

Building height must remain a component of the Comprehensive Plan. Height together with density and usage provide the foundation on which a vision for an area can become a reality. More thoughts on specific height guidelines to follow.

Suzanne Cluckey · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 21, 2017 3:28 pm 8 Votes

I was frankly dumbstruck that the planning commission was willing to support the Estelle towers design as presented. And I thank each of the city council members who brought the good judgment to the table to deny variance for a project so monumentally out of scale with the surrounding residential neighborhoods.

Change is inevitable, but let's have it thoughtfully planned and implemented. I'd love to see 7200 and 7250 France redeveloped; the buildings there now are abominably ugly. But I'm not willing to accept a 14-story high-density development in their place — or to take the word of a development company that there's simply no other feasible solution. I think that just shows a lack of imagination — or an overabundance of greed. Or both.

Kirk Grandstrand · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 26, 2017 10:46 am 4 Votes

Common sense restrictions must be a key component of any comprehensive and neighborhood plan. Common sense should be defined as any construction that does not have an adverse impact on the bordering neighborhood. Adverse impacts can include such nuisances as: visual obstruction caused by excessive height, noise pollution, significant increases in traffic, or any unintended tax burdens created for Edina citizens not borne by developers. Also, I would like to see Commissioners and Council Members adhere strictly to whatever strategic vision is implemented.

Anne Griffiths · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 26, 2017 2:16 pm 3 Votes

Continue current height requirements per the expiring Comp plan and enforce graded

13 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

height standards to buffer neighborhoods. The DoubleTree is an eyesore and putting up more buildings of that height will hurt property value with unappealing interruptions to view. That's without the issue of traffic. Furthermore, I support low height multi-family housing but large projects like the Estelle will attract buyers who are not motivated to support school levies (fewer kids will inhabit those buidings), ultimately leading to a downward trend in property values. The land and quality of the homes are not the major driver of the property value here, thus we need to protect the success and desirability of our schools.

Leslie Iyer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 26, 2017 3:12 pm 3 Votes

We need to maintain the common sense height restrictions offered by the Southdale working group and the comp plan: transition areas need to be maintained as 4-5 story maximum building heights. This would be true whether the transition zone is immediately adjacent to single family homes, or is adjacent to duplex or 1-2 story apartment buildings that serve as a even lower transition zones. Modern traffic studies need to be completed and reviewed with all the various projects that are either in the works or proposed TAKEN TOGETHER - the Estelle project was not even brought before the Edina Transportation Commission for review, much less studied for its impact on 70th, 66th and Valley View.

Erin Brumm · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 27, 2017 3:23 pm 3 Votes

I would be fine with 4 stories like much of Edina. The Estelle project was was too large for the proposed area. I would have been more open minded to 4 stories. There are places like pentagon park or off 494 to our large high rises. The Cornelia area is overly crowded now. School was full avd needed two enlargements. Traffic on France and 7oth is jam packed all day. We’re putting Lot new building around southdale. Slow down. See how they work. Stop trying box neighborhoods in by towers. That’s appropriate downtown. Not in Edina

Ann Makres · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 27, 2017 4:43 pm 5 Votes

We would be comfortable with retaining the current height restrictions in this area. Residential areas are located too close to France to allow an increase in height. We live in the Cornelia area because we want to live in a neighborhood where we know our neighbors and not an area like downtown where neighbors are strangers.

John Jurkovich · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 27, 2017 5:34 pm 4 Votes

The 2018 Comprehensive Plan should support Vision Edina and protect the local neighborhoods. Buildings closest to the neighborhoods should be appropriate in scale and impact to provide a meaningful transition in terms of height and density. Current building height restrictions for sites closest to the neighborhoods are 4 stories (48 ft. max). This seems appropriate and should be supported going forward.

14 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Margaret Kinney · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 28, 2017 11:34 pm 3 Votes

I understand the Comp Plan has some impact on how decisions are made, but it is really up to Zoning to make the final determination about development and plans. I am not sure which individuals or entities make up the zoning committee, but emphasis needs to be placed on that group of people on approving reasonable plans. I think the current Comp Plan makes sense. I am curious to know what the "Southdale Plan" actually entails and how the city is planning/ reviewing current and future developments.

Nora Davis · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 29, 2017 8:30 am 6 Votes

Planning for the Southdale area should be done thoughtfully - with input from the surrounding neighborhoods. Southdale is part of Edina's history - and excessive height would obscure that history. As one of the millennials at my work place commented "why would they put tall buildings in that area - they would look so "out of place". Allowing tall buildings along the edges of the Southdale area on France Avenue would isolate the surrounding neighborhoods. Villages need to be created - not silos. Tall buildings belong near the freeway - or near Public Works, not in the Greater Southdale area. Our new Comp Plan needs to include restrictions - re: height and those important Transition Zones.

Response: Amy Westrom · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 31, 2017 1:26 pm Thank you Nora! I completely agree. I live between France and Xerxes, and Crosstown/62 and 66th Street. This is my home. Just because I am adjacent to Southdale doesn't mean I want to have my view of the sky blocked with tall buildings, and the additional traffic congestion, any more than Cornelia residents do. Silos, indeed!

Jon DeMars Victorsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 29, 2017 3:06 pm 1 Votes

Fifty stories if it causes airplane traffic to veer away from Edina! From a planning standpoint all the rules have changed from years ago in how we picture "home" and "community." Edina neighborhoods no longer have focus of a grade school or parks. To me, Southdale is looking more like New York City, with tall buildings hugging Central Park. If that paradigm fits the direction of new construction, then let's embrace it. Let's have high density around Southdale, so at least one part of Edina can attract dependable rapid transit.

TM Fisher · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 30, 2017 11:59 am 4 Votes

Edina touts neighborhoods as the "backbone" of our community. Planning commission, city council and the Mayor must continue to respect the Lake Cornelia Neighborhood - and say "NO" to amending the Comp Plan to increase height and add more density. This is a lovely neighborhood, let's keep this that way for the next generation.

15 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Jennifer OBrien · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 30, 2017 12:50 pm 3 Votes

I agree that the current Comp Plan standards seem appropriate to the neighborhood with lower 4-story buildings with a buffer and 12-stories closer to commercial areas.

Kari Geadelmann · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 30, 2017 1:50 pm 4 Votes

Please adhere to the current comp plan in the Southdale area regarding heights, and a maximum of 4 story buildings. This is especially important West of France Avenue, where there are single family homes. Buildings with greater height belong closer to 494, Pentagon Park, and the public works area. Please maintain the single family neighborhood feel, by not surrounding the Lake Cornelia area with tall buildings. If homeowners wanted that feel, they would have purchased in downtown Minneapolis, Uptown, or elsewhere. Not Edina. I fully understand that development and change is inevitable, but I ask you to be thoughtful with your choices. With every decision, please try to put yourself in the shoes of those who live in the area. Thank you for being an advocate for Edina residents and for the historic Lake Cornelia Neighborhood.

Neal Tillotson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 30, 2017 2:42 pm 4 Votes

I attended the Planning Commission and City Council meetings on Estelle-Edina. The most extraordinary aspect of those meetings was the utter failure of Mr. Bernardi and Mr. Ryan to make a viable case for their grotesque proposal based on the nine principles of the Southdale Working Group—principles upon which the entire proposal was supposedly predicated.

Would a 24-story building have built upon existing assets any more effectively than, say, a 12-story building? Would it have improved access any more? Would it have been more walkable, more human-scaled, or more architecturally varied? Would it have been any more mixed-use, more of a destination, or any more family friendly? More green? More adaptable to summer or winter conditions? Would a 24-story building have been any more connected than a building of reasonable height?

The answer to these questions should be obvious. The developers could not extrapolate from any of the nine principles the absolute need for a 24-story building. They just couldn’t do it.

And that’s because they were missing the 10th principle—the principle of profit. A 24- story building would simply have been a lot more profitable for the developers than a 12- story building. Or an 18-story, or a 4-story building. More stories, more profit. We all know that.

So the question I would respectfully ask the City Council to pose to any future developer, is this. Can they figure out a way to make enough profit—a reasonable profit—without violating the existing constraints. Is it even possible?

And if it is, then they should do it.

16 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

And if it isn’t, and if the Planning Commission or City Council approves a plan to violate the constraints—or, worse yet, removes or compromises the constraints in the 2018 plan —then there is only one logical conclusion that we can draw.

And that is, from that point forward, the guiding principle—the overriding principle—of the City of Edina would no longer be the general welfare of all of its residents, but instead the profit of its developers.

That would be the legacy of all who vote for such a change. They may not intend it to be that. They may not believe it to be that. But many of their constituents would perceive it to be that.

Jenny Griskevicius · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 30, 2017 2:58 pm 3 Votes

Moderate building height is necessary in the transition zones between residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. As mentioned by many others, taller buildings directly adjacent to malls are somewhat expected and blend better; directly across the street from single-family homes, they are invasive and an eyesore. Although the Estelle project plan was beautiful, it was completely out of proportion to the surrounding neighborhood.

Regarding the new Comp Plan, I think it is extremely important to include height restrictions. If height restrictions are left out, thereby forcing a new debate for every project proposal that comes along, the developers will easily wear down the resolve of the neighborhood residents -- we can't spend the hours (to preserve our neighborhoods) on top of our regular lives the way that developers can spend those hours (to change our neighborhoods) as part of their jobs.

I agree that redevelopment of many of the properties in the Southdale area would be great; I ask that everyone continue to be very thoughtful with their decisions so we end up with a great result for Edina and all residents already living in the impacted neighborhoods.

Thank you for your work for our city.

william Davis · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 30, 2017 6:27 pm 2 Votes

Edina has done a very nice job of 'blending' the medical area, commercial area and residential area in this part of our city. A significant change in terms of increasing the height of buildings would certainly impact especially the residential area. Our family has lived in our current home for 51 years. The Estelle project proposal certainly brought to the forefront significant concerns, which I share, concerning the impact this would have on the single dwelling residential area.

Mark Manfred · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 30, 2017 6:55 pm 2 Votes

17 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

The Planning Commission and City Council should adhere to the existing Comprehensive Plan in the Southdale area. The Edina residents I have discussed this with don't want high buildings, especially near single-family homes. I disagree with some Council members who have suggested that Edina will stagnate if we don't allow high rise. My disagreement is based on my experience with Wilmette, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago. Our daughter lives in Wilmette and she and her neighbors love the community. It has hardly any buildings over four stories, save the beautiful Bahai Temple which is far from single-family homes. Housing prices in Wilmette are well above the prices in Edina. There is no need for more high rise in Edina.

Paul Bastyr · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 30, 2017 9:29 pm 2 Votes

I too attended the Estelle Meetings and was horrified that this proposal was actually developed this far with such complete disregard for the Cornelia Neighborhood. I support continuing the existing height restrictions (4 stories west of France Avenue) and protecting single family neighborhoods. If you want to add height and density - under 12 stories, add it in the core of the Southdale area where the buildings aren't disruptive to single family homes.

Lisa Roberts · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 30, 2017 11:02 pm 4 Votes

The Comp Plan needs to retain the existing limitation of 4 stories or 48 feet in transition areas. The specific measurement in feet needs to remain as developers often will use different measurements for a story than 12 feet. While these issues should be addressed in zoning ordinances, this is currently not the case and should therefore remain. Removing the limitation would be detrimental to the neighborhoods. Currently, this is the only assurance, albeit not guaranteed as we seen with the Estelle Project, that home buyers have of what to reasonably expect when purchasing a home. Companies have the ability to include limitations and requirements in their land purchases/leases, such as Macy's demand to not block their view, but home buyers do not. We need to have clear regulations that protect residents, neighborhoods, and the city from wasteful development proposals like Estelle, and we need to have assurance that City officials will require residents and businesses to adhere to the regulations. The Comp Plan also needs to clearly define what a transition zone is to avoid developers trying to inject their own self-serving interpretation of it. The City needs to implement clear, the thoughtful, smart city planning that includes recommendations of residents, not just the unrealistic and out of touch desires of the Mayor, City Manager, and City Planner.

Cosette DeCesare · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 31, 2017 8:09 am 3 Votes

I do not feel comfortable with building heights greater than 4 stories on the West side of France Ave in the Southdale area. This is my neighborhood!!! I do not want towering buildings in it. It would completely change the feel of our community.

On the East side of France in the Southdale area I am comfortable with 12 stories - no higher than that. The area is already hugely congested as is. As a community, we should proceed with caution and deliberateness when planning new

18 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

builds. Big picture!

Response: Amy Westrom · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 31, 2017 1:21 pm I live east of France Avenue between France and Xerxes. I don't want these tall buildings in my neighborhood any more than you do. Please, enough of the NIMBY. We ALL live here in Edina.

Lewis Marshall · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 31, 2017 8:23 am 2 Votes

.My wife and I chose to live in Edina 25 years ago as a good place to raise our children. It was a quiet residential neighborhood. I don't feel having tall, densely populated buildings in a single family neighborhood is a good idea. It will lead to increased traffic cutting through our residential neighborhoods and by Cornelia elementary school. Commercial buildings over four stories tall should be kept East of France Av. The city of Edina should follow the existing comprehensive plan.

Response: Amy Westrom · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 31, 2017 1:20 pm I live east of France Avenue between France and Xerxes. I don't want these tall buildings in my neighborhood any more than you do. Please, enough of the NIMBY. We ALL live here in Edina.

patricia schreiber · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 31, 2017 9:35 am 1 Votes

The general consensus of all discussions on building heights seems to be to keep them within the current comp plan and respect the transitional zone as well. The neighborhoods should be protected! Those people wanting to downsize to luxury condos have had the opportunity to live in their homes and raise their families, with that protection, all the while enjoying what Edina has to offer. Families moving into their homes should be able to enjoy that same protection. How often we hear that families want to live here for the school system. These are families with adults and children who can contribute and give back to our community and be part of our future. To make the neighborhoods less appealing by allowing obtrusively large living units so close would be ashame. The practicality of keeping the density within reason benefits those families as they have to commute to work, school and so many of their children's activities within reasonable time frames. I believe the council can find developers who can meet the needs of those wanting to downsize in Edina and the city's wishes to honor that in ways that will still protect what we now have in our neighborhoods. Several lower height units placed in various parts of the city could accommodate the numbers of those downsizing, they do not all need to be in the Southdale area. At the same time the Galleria is expanding its retail, Southdale is struggling, the retail below the apartments behind Byerly's has vacancies, and there are future developments coming in that area with retail spaces. Estelle was adding more! How much can we support? How much of a 'beauty' would Estelle be if from street view we saw empty store fronts? Would it still be such a desirable "experience" if that were the case? It's the neighborhoods that are most important to this community, let's keep that priority in the forefront.

19 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Rick Hauritz · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 31, 2017 10:28 am 2 Votes

Why are we talking about building height in the first place....we have a comprehensive plan for the future that address this issue. We have existing issues with traffic and population density, the city should address these issues and not complicate the issues with taller buildings which will add to the population and worsen the traffic. I would not support any changes to current height limits anywhere in Edina, unless they're adjusted downward. Broadly speaking, developers should present proposals consistent with our Comprehensive Plan. We shouldn't be grappling with misaligned proposals.

Hope Melton · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 31, 2017 10:53 am 0 Votes

The Southdale area is the right place for significant increases in building height, provided it makes room for pedestrian ways and green space. So far, Centennial Lakes is an excellent model and additional mixed use buildings at 10 - 12 stories. The Estelle Project building heights were too extreme and located too close to residential neighborhoods.

Mark Chamberlain · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 31, 2017 1:22 pm 1 Votes

I don't feel the existing limits of 4 - 12 stories should be tampered with, unless you lower it to 2 - 8 stories. On France Avenue itself between 69th and 7250/Gallagher Drive any new redevelopment should be limited to 2/3 stories on the west side of the street and 4 stories on the east side of the street. Development of 4 - 6 stories should be at least 1 block east of France and 1 block west of York. Development of 6 -8 stories should be at least 2 blocks east of France and 2 blocks west of York. We don't need tall buildings and skyscrapers to be an "urban" area. Minneapolis is an urban city, but outside of the downtown core there are very few areas that have 10 -12 story buildings, let alone skyscrapers. The Cornelia neighborhood began development in the mid 1950's, around the same time as Southdale. Commercial development on the west side of France Ave between 69th & Gallagher Dr. didn't start until they built the 1 story former Vikings headquarters, now the Cremation Society, at 7110 France Ave in 1963. The 1 story Bremer bank site at 6900 was built in 1966, and the 2 story office buildings at 6950 and 7200 France followed in 1967. Our former City leaders recognized the need to gradually transition the residential neighborhoods to the commercial district, something that seems to be lost on today's leaders. The Cornelia neighborhood has not receded to the west, so the needs that were recognized by our leaders in the 50's and 60's are still there today. Regarding the "core" of the Southdale area, between France and York, I see no need to build taller than 8 - 10 stories. Tastefully done we could have a vibrant environment in the Southdale area without high rises and skyscrapers. There is a great need to figure out how to handle congestion and traffic in the area and that cannot be done by evaluating each individual project that comes along in isolation. The City needs to take control and have a master plan for the area that lets developers and residents know what height is and is not acceptable in different areas of the district and then stick to it. If we had such a plan and the resolve to stick to it developers like Ryan would never think of proposing a skyscraper anywhere in the District because they would know from the start that the answer would be no. It is my understanding that developers indicated to the Southdale Area Workgroup that they would like to have clear guidelines to work

20 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

within. It's time for the City to get on board.

Scott Anderson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 31, 2017 1:31 pm 1 Votes

The height limits of 4 stories for the buffer zones should not be changed, as this ensures that our neighborhoods will be enhanced and protected as the Southdale area experiences redevelopment. I would be open to buildings taller than 12 stories as long as the existing set back limits are honored. This also serves to protect the residential neighborhoods.

"The City of Edina Strategic Vision and Framework" document states, "Residential neighborhoods continue to serve as the defining characteristic of the city, and there is a high desire to protect and enhance such neighborhoods." The residential neighborhoods are not merely considered "a defining characteristic," but rather "the defining characteristic." Therefore, when considering comprehensive plans, careful consideration needs to be given to building heights that will "protect and enhance" the neighborhoods, not do the opposite. There is a place for taller buildings to be built. However, that is not right across the street from low-density single family housing, as was proposed with the Estelle project. Buffer zones that have wisely been part of comprehensive plans over the years should be respected. Nothing has changed that has made buffer zones irrelevant. The place for taller buildings in the Southdale area is in the middle of the York Ave - France Ave, not on the fringes or even outside.

I was significantly disappointed by the planning commission members who voted in favor of "spot zoning" for the Estelle project, by amending the comprehensive plan. I strongly urge the planning commission members to consider the reasons why every city council member, other than Mayor Hovland, voted against amending the comprehensive plan to allow for the Estelle to be built on the west side of France Ave.

Thank you City council members for remembering that your residential neighborhoods are THE defining characteristic of Edina and for protecting them as such!

John Carlson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 31, 2017 1:57 pm 1 Votes

Building height in the Southdale area (pretty much between 62nd and 494/France and York/Xerxes) should be a function of proximity to residential neighborhoods, set backs, and transition. In the core of the area, I am ok with taller buildings similar to Centennial Lakes Office Park; say 6-8 floors. At the south and north points of the Southdale area, I think there is room for taller buildings; say 10-15 floors. Along France, height should be limited to 2 stories if there is no transition to SFR neighborhoods. I good transition is available, then I feel buildings along France can be 4 floors; the Wings Financial is an example. In these cases, parking should be screened, again similar to Centennial Lakes Office park. There are areas along France where the building is 1 story in height and to the west are 1 story commercial /industrial; I believe these sites are underutilized. Set backs, berms, and screening make a big difference. Macy's large, exposed parking lot is not attractive. A 4 story building along France, needs appropriate set backs, berms to protect pedestrians, and screened parking. The York/Xerxes corridor does not have SFR to worry about, so slightly taller projects can be tolerated.

21 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

FYI, I think the Council reached the absolutely correct decision on Estelle. The project was way out of bounds for Edina.

Thank you for the opportunity to share my thoughts.

Marie Sullivan · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 31, 2017 3:46 pm 0 Votes

I absolutely agree 12 stories is way too tall anywhere near lower height residents as well as businesses, whether east or west of France! Also, even though Pentagon Park is closer to 494, that area should never be more than 4 stories because it is directly south of residential homes!

70TH & CAHILL 7 Answers · 0 Replies Currently in the 70th & Cahill area, the building height is limited between two and four stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why?

Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Sep 22, 2017 7:00 pm 5 Votes

I used to live at 77th and Cahill. My concern with greater heights at that intersection is the level of traffic at the corner of 70th and Cahill and the impact of increasing building height on current successful businesses for which parking is adequate and rents have to be reasonable. I am generally opposed to forcing out long terms residents or businesses in pursuit of tax base, particularly when the area East of Cahill Is much larger and has many single level warehouses that probably have more efficient use. Traffic levels in that area to the south are much less. There would be space for corporate headquarters style office building down there as well as high rise apartment blocks.

Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 28, 2017 11:31 pm 3 Votes

I believe the building heights at 70th and Cahill should also remain the same. If they are increased it will encourage higher density development which will purge the naturally occurring affordable housing available in that district presently. Edina is rapidly being over-developed as a result of continued comp plan amendments and variances. These variances/amendments contribute to the loss of naturally occurring affordable housing. I don't think it's appropriate for city officials to amend the comp plan to increase building heights with the intent of encouraging development while displacing residents. And that's in fact what's happening and will happen as a result of eliminating restrictions or increasing building heights.

Paul Nelson · Admin · (Postal Code: 55439) · Oct 03, 2017 2:09 pm 2 Votes

As with the other small area plans we are looking at in this question I feel that this area is a decent area to consider higher density as it is generally a buffer between industrial

22 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

and residential with current residential being multifamily and some single family. This area, with the proper design I feel could support buildings in the 4-6 story range. Again, it's not exactly the height that is the issue here - I believe the design to meld with the neighborhood is more valuable as is the concept being developed and how it will relate with and compliment the neighboring properties and residents.

Joe Corbett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 16, 2017 10:35 am 0 Votes

I think this area could support 6-7, but agree with Joel that the focus out to be the adjacent industrial area that could support mixed-use development with taller buildings.

Gary Bartolett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Oct 16, 2017 4:20 pm 0 Votes

The rub with all of these density questions is what kind of city do the residents what Edina to be: single family or high rise. The Met Council wants high rise so that the residents live where they want them to. If you are dependent on public transportation you must live and work where transport goes and can not escape Minneapolis by voting with your feet. If the residents wanted Minneapolis they would live there. Keep height restrictions as they are and make developers follow them.

Barb Rae · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 9:49 pm 1 Votes

I happen to live in the area being discussed and have for 25 years. I look at the mix as mostly homes with a few small businesses. There are 21 high-end townhouse on the corner and up the hill, and not one owner thinks of their homes as multiple housing. There are a few double bungalows and ONE multiple apartment building.This is a residential area! If you want to change the area then take down the few small businesses and build some homes. No one in the area wants density. It would bring buildings towering over homes, reduce the value of those homes, increase traffic that during rush hour (morning and evening) prevents home owners from exiting their driveways because cars are bumper to bumper all the way up 70th Street. The developers stand to gain through the profits they make, the city gains in creating more tax revenue, and will be able to require more low income units for the area. The people of Edina are the losers in this situation. Very few people want more density, especially in their neighborhoods. I have not heard any reasons given for the push by the city to continue to try to squeeze more and more people into Edina. Please encourage the developers to look somewhere besides Edina to build and leave us to enjoy what we have. People who don't live in the area may have an opinion but please note that they will not be the ones affected by the changes being discussed. This topic came up once before a few years ago. It was not a good idea then, and it is NOT a good idea now.

Barb Rae · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 10:00 pm 1 Votes

Two stories, maximum.

23 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

44TH & FRANCE 82 Answers · 19 Replies Currently in the 44th & France area, the building height is limited to two stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why?

Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Sep 22, 2017 6:47 pm 10 Votes

4 stories maximum - this is part of a charming residential neighborhood. Higher than that would be out of proportion. And the code should be specific - specific in terms of floor and height, as floors with high ceilings could cast a bigger shadow. Absolutely no building to the street with narrow sidewalks. Code should also be very specific about walkability and secure bike parking, as it is a neighborhood hub that should encourage auto-free visits.

Response: greg linhof · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55316) · Oct 11, 2017 9:48 am Linhoff Photo has been at the 44th & France location for over 50 years. Hennipin County has recently raised out property taxes significantly. They are taxing us and other business in the area to the point where we can't survive. You cant sell enough hamburgers, bagels, pizza or coffee to have a business there. Do the residents want bordered up buildings? It's not 1950 anymore.

Chip Jones · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Sep 23, 2017 5:30 am 31 Votes

This area should stay at 2 stories max. It's a small residential commercial area and I see no reason to add more density to it. More stories than this would only add traffic, congestion and noise... hardly an improvement. There is already wasted space in this area that could be better utilized and improved while maintaining two stories maximum.

Sara Lathrop · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Sep 25, 2017 7:49 pm 35 Votes

44th and France is a lovely, historic-feeling neighborhood district. Edina should keep and enhance what makes the the area unique - small, neighborhood-oriented businesses. Buildings that reflect the scale of the space and the neighborhood. I am hopeful for creative development that reflects and enhances the neighborhood... not that overhauls it. One- and two-story buildings can be innovative and wildly successful. See 44th/France Wine & Cheese; Penny's in Linden Hills; Caribou; the running store. For buildings that border single family homes, buildings should be no more than two stories or 24 feet, whichever is less. For other buildings, no more than three stories or 36 feet, whichever is less. There should also be graceful transition requirements for height, scale and setbacks from the commercial area to the area with single family homes. Thank you to the City for soliciting the public's views on this important issue! The community feels passionately about this topic and is hoping our voices are heard.

Response:

24 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

greg linhof · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55316) · Oct 11, 2017 9:50 am Linhoff Photo has been at the 44th & France location for over 50 years. Hennipin County has recently raised out property taxes significantly. They are taxing us and other business in the area to the point where we can't survive. You cant sell enough hamburgers, bagels, pizza or coffee to have a business there. Do the residents want bordered up buildings? It's not 1950 anymore.

Susan Peterson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 27, 2017 4:09 pm 22 Votes

I agree with the views expressed by Chip and Sara. Three-story max along France, two- story max along Sunnyside with transitions from single-family homes. Respect the historic, small- neighborhood feel of this area.

Response: Katharine Winston · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 19, 2017 8:58 am First time on this subject: So many issues regarding this latest "development". As is the intersection of Sunnyside and France is very dangerous for pedestrians - It appears few people have any regard for traffic laws much less people trying to cross France Ave. Up and down France Ave people in cars are creating their own lanes, passing on the shoulder, making illegal turns, not allowing students/pedestrians to cross - and on and on it goes. NOW the City of Edina wants to introduce more traffic BEFORE addressing these life threatening situations. Concerning the HEIGHT of these new, neighbor "enhancing" buildings, I side with those most effected: no higher than 3 stories on France and no higher than 2 stories by residential dwellings. In my opinion, what the City of Edina did at 50th & France has turned that intersection into a shadowed canyon-like feature. The City of Wayzata did the same thing, too, but even worse. Woe be to those citizens living in close proximity to what will be erected at France & "Market" Street.

Emily Pfeifer · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 27, 2017 4:25 pm 26 Votes

I agree with Sara. Buildings bordering a single family residence should be no taller than 2 stories, especially since there are so many 1.5 story houses that block. Graceful transitions should be incorporated, and the max for closer to France should be 3 stories. Anything taller would be out of character for the corner and would bring a host of traffic and parking issues.

Barbara Norrgard · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 28, 2017 11:36 am 22 Votes

I couldn't say it any better than Sara. I agree with her response and especially when she says neighbors feel passionately about this and hope our voices are heard. Thanks for asking us.

Julie Schmidt · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 28, 2017 11:58 am 29 Votes

The 44th/France area should maintain building heights of no more than two stories or 24

25 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

feet, whichever is less. Taller buildings will take away from the character and charm of this historic neighborhood. There is a petition that collected 329 signatures from residents of this neighborhood asking for height restrictions, among other things, to be included in the plan. Thank you for offering the community an opportunity to weigh in on this. This is a very important issue.

Matt Cramer · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 28, 2017 2:59 pm 23 Votes

Although not the only factor, height is a significant influence which helps maintain the charm of this unique area. Keeping the current two story/24' restriction would ensure that the walkability and ability to live in such close proximity of the commercial neighbors does not deteriorate with greater density. Additional business development is welcome as come buildings were built with little regards to aesthetics or historic value; however, that business or their buildings should not dominate the space, but rather compliment the area which is surrounding by single family residential. Due to the relative small footprint of this commercial area, a graceful transition between commercial and residential from more than 2 stories is not realistic and should not be allowed.

Thank you for a forum to allow our voices to be heard.

Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 28, 2017 11:12 pm 18 Votes

I concur with the opinions above. Two stories should be the maximum height in the transition zone from commercial to residential, and perhaps some three story allowed on certain France facing parcels. This is a small commercial node and it cannot support high density as traffic and congestion will overflow to the adjacent residential area and negatively impacts the neighborhood. The infrastructure can't adequately support high density or be expanded, nor does it suit the charm and appeal of the area. There must be specific hieight and density limitations to secure the long term interests and benefits of the neighborhood as a whole, both residential and commercial. Removing such specific limitations from the plan will create ongoing conflict of interests and create a precedent for higher density. Lack of foresight and balance will result in inequity and design flaw.

Lou Miranda · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Sep 28, 2017 11:43 pm 7 Votes

Transportation and density go hand-in-hand. Anywhere a seaport is created, or a navigable river flows, or a train (or light rail) goes, or a highway, ring road, county road, or urban bikeway goes, so goes development. As a county road that can handle a large number of vehicles and has an existing bus system, France Ave. is where it makes sense to have the densest development. No one would advocate tearing down single family homes and building 4-story apartments on a side street like Townes Rd. or Crocker Ave. or Casco Ave. But at 44th & France we already have a 100-year old commercial area that has never seen an increase in density.

To follow the principles of Vision Edina and Living Streets, we want dense, walkable areas (because walkable implies density—you need many destinations to walk to & from).

26 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Nobody’s asking for 10-story buildings, but 3-4 stories is a no-brainer, and 5 stories along France is a possibility with the right compromises.

While the houses in that area are mostly older and smaller (and often quite beautiful), there is nothing preventing the owners from selling and new developers tearing down the houses and putting much taller structures there, as has happened in many other parts of Morningside. So while we don’t want the 4 stories of France next to single family homes, 2-3 stories makes perfect sense.

So I think 4 (possibly 5) stories along France is perfectly reasonable. (Everyone thinks Paris is beautiful, walkable, historic, charming, and has great neighborhood character, and virtually all of Paris is 6-story buildings; so 4 or more stories is not unreasonable to be “charming”.)

I think we do need to push developers to have buildings that look good in this neighborhood. We don’t want the buildings to look exactly the same, but there are nice looking brand new buildings that match the neighborhood charm. The photos show the 4-story Oxford Hill building on Grand Ave. in St. Paul, and the stone & brick building with old-fashioned lighting along the facade and setback upper levels meshes beautifully with the 1- and 2-story buildings that surround it (and the single family homes behind it). No, we don’t want 44th & France to look like Southdale or Excelsior & Grand, but St. Paul shows how you can get graceful, dense buildings in a historic neighborhood.

Response: Mike Ebnet · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 02, 2017 11:24 am Lou you are a real estate person aren't you? Do you live in this area? Just curious

Response: Matt Cramer · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 07, 2017 1:41 pm The difference with France-44 area and the Oxford hill building is that instead of Sprint and The Running Room we have single family residential next to the proposed construction on France-Sunnyside.

Where is our graceful transition as immediate neighbors on Sunnyside?

Mike Mankey · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 29, 2017 11:01 am 25 Votes

I've been an Edina resident on Sunnyside Road for 22 years and feel it should be limited to two stories on the Sunnyside Road side. If you look down Sunnyside Road you don't see anything that is over two stories. Lets keep it that way!!

Judy Schmidt · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Sep 29, 2017 12:51 pm 22 Votes

Building height is a critical element in approving any new development in this 44thStreet/Sunnyside Road/France Avenue area. The present code limit at two stories/24 feet provides the natural transition to the single family homes that give Morningside its community feel, desirable location and has helped the entire area maintain house values. Three stories changes everything when you are talking about private homes next door. France Avenue may be able to support three stores because of its designation as a

27 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

major roadway, but you still have private residential homes next door, so less than desirable. The entire redevelopment can have a major effect on traffic and France Avenue is already congested and this is before the major changes at 50th and France and the Southdale area have been completed. I don’t think anyone thinks change won’t happen. It just needs to be reasonable, within code limits and designed to enhance the livibility of the neighborhood, not detract from it. The development site has already consumed two previous residential lots. I do not see this as progress. We have lived on Sunnyside for 10 years and in the neighborhood for over 40. There is a reason we continue to want to live here and it is not the building of multi story commercial/condo buildings, but the neighborhood and its walkability. We know change will happen but we don’t want change to destroy the livability. I would also comment that this is Morningside and NOT Paris.

greta simondet · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Sep 29, 2017 1:51 pm 11 Votes

I agree with Sara Lathrop.

Ernest Ashcroft · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 29, 2017 5:19 pm 10 Votes

I strongly feel that in order to maintain the current character of the area and to limit traffic so that it remains accessible to bycles and pedestrians the maximum height of buildings on France must be three stories or less

Matthew McGivney · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Sep 30, 2017 9:50 am 15 Votes

I agree with the local residents of that area. Keep the historic charm of the neighborhood and keep to the current limits.

Mike Ebnet · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 02, 2017 11:26 am 8 Votes

Why is density important? It doesn't make Edina more walkable for the people already here.

Mark Greiner · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 02, 2017 6:00 pm 5 Votes

My view is change is necessary, appropriate, and inevitable. The current location does not present well and is not consistent with the charm of the White Oaks, Morningside and Country Club neighborhoods. That corner is the gateway to all of the neighborhoods, and it can be better. I believe a well done apartment or condo building with some retail will ultimately benefit the area, and I am not opposed to a reasonable 4 story building - I suspect limiting it to two stories will make it economically infeasible and likely result in no development (or just another strip center).

28 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Frank Bennett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 02, 2017 6:06 pm 5 Votes

I would like to suggest that the city step back and take a look at the corner of 44th and France in relation to how that corner looks and operates today and how we can enhance the corner for tomorrow. The discussion should not start with the height of development but what does the neighborhood and community need, what would improve and help distinguish the corner of 44th and France and what is appropriate for the space I grew up going to Dennison's Dairy store, morning side hardware and Joyce's bakery and have raised my family in the Neighbirhood for 25 years. We would all agree it is a unique and special Neighbirhood, but I have to say that this particular Corner is a bit if an eyesore today and the traffic does not flow well. It needs some attention and care to get it back in shape. Before getting bogged down on heights, it would be prudent to see what development plans are submitted for debate. Some plans might include aspects to improve the flow of traffic. Others might bring fun dining or cute shops to the Neighbirhood . More importantly, some plans might offer housing alternatives for those of us in the neighborhood who may some day want to downsize but not leave the immediate neighborhood. I'm not sure what the right answer is but I think we would be wise to consider a number of options with a number of different height options. If a building with an extra floor or two would bring certain amenities to the Neighbirhood and possibly some resources to improve traffic, I would like to hear those options rather than preclude them from the debate based on an arbitrary height requirement. Thanks to all for their input

Ryann Doucette · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 02, 2017 10:34 pm 6 Votes

I think that 4 stories seems appropriate at the border of residential and commercial seems appropriate. We can't expect any developers to build at a 2 story maximum height- meaning we get the cool restaurant and coffee shop on ground level and they are left with one level to build apartments/ condos above. This is not a viable financial model. A certain amount of vertical leaves more surrounding greenspace at ground level for our enjoyment.

Scott Smith · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · Oct 03, 2017 9:41 am 6 Votes

I believe that 5 stories along France Avenue and 4 stories along Sunnyside & 44th is an adequate limitation on height in the existing commercial node at 44th & France. The new apartment building on France on the east side is 4 stories and not imposing at all. This area currently has several blighted commercial properties and I would really like to see good redevelopment occur in 2018. With the cost of land & construction, it is inconceivable to expect any decent development to occur with limitations of 2 & 3 stories.

Response: Mark Schmidt · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 31, 2017 2:09 pm The most recent redevelopments in Edina's 44th and France Small Area, the Gateway Bank building last year, was one story on France (although it looks like three stories from the backyards in White Oaks). So it is not just conceivable, but provable, that decent developments can occur with limitation of 2 & 3 stories - they are happening

29 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

right now.

Robert Wolfe · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 03, 2017 9:45 am 7 Votes

Agree with others who feel change will happen. Development will occur. Better to have development that reflects the character of the best buildings on the corner. 1930's brick and mortar vs flat modern or mostly glass / steel structures like the new hair studio on the Minneapolis side. If done well, a four or five story (with recessed top story) building could be an asset to the neighborhood. The plan should allow more stories but, more importantly, assure we gain other enhancements in return. Enhancements like burying power lines, wider sidewalks, brick and mortar construction, green space, better parking options. Win/win. If we resist the development that will be profitable and provide those enhancements, we risk have a 'make a quick buck' developer put a Taco Bell on that corner.

melanie casserly · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 03, 2017 10:47 am 10 Votes

This area should stay at 2 stories max. I have small kids that like to bike on the sidewalk and larger buildings goes hand in hand with more traffic..which i am not in favor of. It's already hard to pull out of our driveway sometimes b/c there is a constant traffic flow adding to that will make it more difficult. There is plenty of existing space that could be used better.

Response: Jenifer Shoemate · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · Oct 24, 2017 8:51 pm If you have kids you have to consider this. The piece that is not being discussed here about our charming neighborhood, is that there are dangerous environmental contaminants beneath the dry cleaner that must be dealt with. If we do not support a multiple story (revenue-generating) development on that Property, the contamination can be ignored. Removing the contaminants beneath a historic gas station and dry cleaner will be costly. To be done correctly a development must be able to recoup costs. What one to two-story building can afford the remediation costs? Maybe a CVS? Not so charming.

gerald szykulski · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 03, 2017 12:29 pm 7 Votes

Being a 10 year resident of Country Club in Edina I think the point that most are missing is that if a 5 story building (I am 100% in favor of) goes up in this location is that cars will get left in the garage or eliminated. This is spot an amazing walkable/bikeable location, grocery stores, entertainment, food, the lakes etc. I see this as a good addition to the area and would consider moving in if it gets built.

Response:

30 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Laurine Ford · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 31, 2017 12:22 pm Nice theory, but people are going to drive to work. More cars in neighborhood means more cars on the road, including more cut through traffic in Country Club and more traffic jams on France.

Paul Nelson · Admin · (Postal Code: 55439) · Oct 03, 2017 1:53 pm 6 Votes

Height alone perhaps is not the real question here.

I believe our city is looking for how to shape and mold developers concepts to be attractive and native to the area they are being proposed. With green space and setbacks the sheerness of a buildings appearance can be molded to fit in or be in stark contrast to what the space desires. My feeling is that the two story mid block building (that currently houses Snap Fitness) is much too tall for the area, with it rising two full stories of boring precast panels from the sidewalk to the rooftop complete with a drive thru and parking lot below. This building does not fit the neighborhood and likely should not have been built.

Some of this discussion also goes to timing, as there is demand for quality units to be built on an attractive corner -- now. Next year, things may change and we could be looking at another two story precast panel building to be placed on this corner. The developer is ready to go now, and has proposed a quality building looking to increase the demand to live in this neighborhood as well as bringing up the value of the surrounding real estate (I realize this is a discussion revolving around the small area plan and not specific to one project or one developer, but there is a proposed development waiting in the wings for the outcome of this SAP).

My thought is that this area can support a 4-5 story building, if properly designed for the neighborhood. The point of density is that it creates transportation options for residents as they choose their method of moving about the neighborhood and city. With more density in this and other nodes within the city, other nearby residents will also benefit from the transit options as they develop.

AJ Co · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 03, 2017 3:34 pm 2 Votes

Building height can be a very good thing for a community. The variables of location, use, design quality, and potential to generate property tax revenue will all vary project to project. Since the Met Council does not require height limitations, I believe we should omit height limitations from the Small Area Plan and instead entrust decision making on height to the project-by-project approvals processes already in place within the City of Edina.

Response: Gary Bartolett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Oct 26, 2017 10:40 am Removing limitations only leaves developers free to propose anything which leaves residents fighting every development. If you have not noticed the number of controversial projects in the city in the last year (Estelle, 7200 France, Arden Park, Winter Sports Facility at Braemar) you should. We are spending an inordinate amount of time fighting over things that we should not need to fight over. Why? We need to

31 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

set expectations and follow them.

Laura Graf · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 04, 2017 8:53 am 4 Votes

It seems that the focus of the discussion should be on the nature of a specific project, the measures taken to integrate into the surrounding area and the willingness of the developer to work with the community and take its concerns into account when designing the final product. Simply shutting down a project based on height or other perceived characteristics without really considering the facts and the project's specific attributes seems inappropriate. The area at 44th and France is commercial in nature and would benefit from a well planned and well designed project to replace antiquated buildings and uses. With a well planned project, this area can be an attribute to the adjoining commercial and can exist symbiotically with the residential.

K.B. Montgomery · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 05, 2017 3:39 pm 13 Votes

I agree with Sara Lathrop and those who have voiced support for her position.

In addition, I have two primary concerns regarding development at 44th and France. The first is maintaining the small businesses that serve the city today. When the city grants variances to developers for height and density, they raise the value of the land. When the value of the underlying land increases it gives incentives to area landowners to sell their property to the highest bidder thus forcing the small businesses out of the area. This is not conjecture. It is already happening in the GrandView area. Allowing 4 stories at 44th and France will create a domino effect of land sales in the area. The unique locally owned businesses that we love and use will go away and be replaced by the generic housing and chain stores that typically go hand in hand.

In a review of the book “Vanishing New York: How a Great City Lost its Soul, author Jeremiah Moss is paraphrased saying: “Today we have ’hypergentrification’ the complicity between municipal government and big private money to reconfigure whole sections of the city, with dubious consequences, chief among them the ceding of space, goods and social currency”. The result is the loss of the city’s soul. I would argue that Edina is losing its soul to generic gentrification.

My second concern is one of proper process. The city council intends to urbanize Edina through added height and density. Its urbanization quest focuses primarily on housing and not the other amenities that make city living attractive. The majority of citizens desire height and density that transition to and fit in with neighborhoods. The council does not agree. The result is botched processes in which residents provide their input, the council ignores or cherry picks the input it likes and creates a report/document/Small Area Plan that is deliberately vague. If the report is specific and prescriptive in ways that the council does not like, the plan tends to get shelved and ignored.

Watch for the 44th and France SAP to avoid specifics with respect to height and density or to incorporate more height and density than is supported by the majority of the

32 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

neighborhood. Perhaps the working group will say that it has not been given enough time in order to reach that level of specificity. The city council knew in 2009 when it approved the last Comprehensive Plan that 44th and France had been identified as a potential area of change. There is no reason that the 44th and France SAP planning process should have been condensed into a few months at the end of 2017.

This is not NIMBY –ism. It is quite the opposite--planning around the concept of community. There are many great models throughout the country. Edina is following none of them in its “one off” development model. As a result we are getting a patchwork of mediocre (at best) development that does nothing to foster live-ability, walk-ability and connectively. It is time for the council to apply the brakes, study best practices elsewhere and follow a better model for planning and development in Edina.

Response: Sharon G · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 26, 2017 1:14 pm Kudos to you for bringing this discussion to the heart and soul of what a vital engaged neighborhood requires. Edina talks a lot about economic and social diversity but, by continuing to solicit development and build on the hi-end the decision is to limit diversity.

Response: J. Lonnquist · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 09, 2017 8:16 pm Well-said here -- these insights resonate with what happened during the Market Street approval process. I believe height restrictions are essential and smart development can and should happen with them firmly in place. Obviously height restrictions limit the city's tax revenue and the developer's profits, but that is fine if we aren't asking the developer to solve green-space or parking issues in the surrounding area. I'll bet some fantastic apartments can be added on the large Edina Cleaners lot that top-out at three rather than five stories, with two stories abutting the Sunnyside homes. We don't need to jump at the first proposal and fear that is the only option.

One issue I'd like clarity on in this discussion: does the City of Edina have the capacity to make traffic-flow improvements on France Avenue and 44th Street (e.g. green turn arrows, new lane markings, street parking adjustments) or are these Hennepin County decisions? If improved capacity and flow on these two roads are beyond Edina City Council's control, we should know that and discuss added density accordingly. Thanks to anyone who can clarify.

Mark Ehling · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 05, 2017 10:25 pm 13 Votes

I instantly fell in love with Morningside four years ago because of its unique character and charm. It felt then, and still feels, like a quiet, tree-lined village tucked away into the city. A person can walk the sidewalks here and still feel a sense of history. The 44th and France intersection is a prominent gateway to this neighborhood, and because of this, the intersection (and whatever we make of it) becomes a kind of ambassador for the neighborhood itself, and an embodiment of what we want the neighborhood to be. I believe we have the obligation to preserve the warmth, charm, and historical feel of Morningside. For that reason, I am in favor of: limiting building heights to two stories for those that border single-family homes; limiting building heights to 3 stories for strictly commercial areas; and requiring graceful transitions from commercial to residential

33 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

areas. Thank you for allowing our voices to be heard!

Response: Jenifer Shoemate · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · Oct 24, 2017 8:48 pm The piece that is not being discussed here about our charming neighborhood, is that there are dangerous environmental contaminants beneath the dry cleaner that must be dealt with. If we do not support a multiple story (revenue-generating) development on that Property, the contamination can be ignored. Removing the contaminants beneath a historic gas station and dry cleaner will be costly. To be done correctly a development must be able to recoup costs. What one to two-story building can afford the remediation costs? Maybe a CVS? Not so charming.

Kerry Spencer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 07, 2017 10:40 am 6 Votes

I agree with Sara and the others regarding keeping the 2 story/24' restrictions. I do also feel structures facing France and not Sunnyside could be acceptable at 3 or maybe 4 stories. I have been a resident for over 55 years and remember the convenience of Dennison's Dairy Store, Joyce's Bakery, Morningside Hardware, Carlson's Odd shop, The corner drugstore and the library that was in the current Edina Cleaners building which also housed a hairdressing shop and Westgate Theater. We still have a lot of the walkability in the neighborhood in addition to all the kids riding bikes and joggers. It is great to see all of that activity on the streets and sidewalks. If residences are to be built on the cleaners site, I would prefer to see 2 story townhomes that could be condos so they would be owned vs rented. If a large building is erected, I would certainly prefer to see some character built in vs the "box" look. I would also prefer to see access to a building be from France Ave vs the proposal we saw using Sunnyside for ingress and egress. The fact that well over 300 signatures have been submitted with the petition certainly provides evidence that the citizens are concerned about development.

Chris Dall · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 08, 2017 10:15 am 9 Votes

I agree that there should be building height limits in the 44th and France Small area, with a preference for 3 stories on France Avenue and 2 stories for buildings bordering residential homes. I'm not opposed to change or to increasing density, and I do believe that well-planned, thoughtful development can benefit the neighborhood while maintaining its charm. But I also think that without some kind of limitation on building heights, we could end up with projects that are really ill-suited to this intersection and this neighborhood.

Bill Owens · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 08, 2017 10:18 am 0 Votes

4 stories max!

Mark Valgemae · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 08, 2017 10:22 am 9 Votes

34 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

I also support 3 stories on France and 2 stories in the transitional areas, for the reasons that have already been explained well. I am a 27 year resident of Morningside.

Mary Swendsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Oct 08, 2017 9:51 pm 4 Votes

3 stories on France would blend with the surrounding areas.

Frank Cerra · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 09, 2017 11:19 am 4 Votes

I prefer 2 stories but could live with up to 4. Please preserve the neighborhood pleasantness and friendliness and demeaned. More height creates unpleasant views and walking in increases the already overbearing traffic created by th 50th and France development.

Frank

John Buttolph · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 09, 2017 12:15 pm 6 Votes

Once a maximum height limit is approved, it will never be lowered. Apart from increased tax revenues and developer profit-motive, is there a compelling reason to increase building heights beyond the current limit ? Will increased building height limits beyond 2 stories enhance the quality of life ? Strengthen the coherence of the local community ? Reduce traffic and parking congestion ? Probably not. The residential neighborhood currently transitions gracefully and naturally from one side of France to the other. I do not support increasing heights along 44th between France and Xerxes. At the corner of 44th and France. a three-story height would be alright, but I don't see any reason that persuades me that the benefits outweigh the detriment.

rachid ettouhami · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 10, 2017 2:57 pm 7 Votes

Traffic and congestion is already happening especially around rush hours. Adding more stories and height will make it even worse. It is hard to pull out of our driveway sometimes b/c there is a constant traffic. Keep the historic charm of the neighborhood and keep to the current limits.

Heather Wallace · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 11, 2017 8:48 am 3 Votes

Residences are next door to the commercial buildings on Sunnyside Ave. The area is a small charming commercial district. Keeping height restrictions to 3 stories can maintain the district. The city should work with existing business owners and residents to facilitate parking or traffic improvements as needed and requested. Allow business and development interests to work within the constraints of building codes (3 stories) for the neighborhood to develop naturally within a free market system, constrained by codes

35 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

and restrictions which are put in place by the government at the request of the citizens in order to protect property values and maintain current density. The government restrictions should reflect the desires of the citizens, not the developers.

Lauren Warner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Oct 11, 2017 9:53 am 5 Votes

The charm will remain. Having more more stories (let's go with 4) brings more people. More people means more patrons of surroundings businesses and everyone wins. Limiting stories because of "charm"'doesn't make sense to me. Seems like it's about growing our community and growing revenues for local businesses in the area.

Bryan Badzin · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 11, 2017 10:16 am 7 Votes

Five stories seems to be a reasonable limit IF the building fits the neighborhood in all the other ways mentioned in the many comments above, which I will not repeat here. There are already other buildings that are more than three stories near the area i.e. Mill Valley Kitchen (5), and Linden 43 (4), and in my opinion, are not eye-sores as they are done in a way that "fits the neighborhood". Finally, having more people living in the neighborhood helps the businesses that are there already which we shouldn't take for granted.

jason VOGT · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 11, 2017 8:49 pm 4 Votes

This should not be an argument about building height. It should be a discussion of what the building provides for the community and this is clearly a high quality project Building a high quality development often needs more than two stories. Commerce is a vital part for the growth of our neighborhoods/communities and putting unnecessary restrictions will discourage necessary development.

Jenifer Shoemate · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · Oct 14, 2017 8:19 pm 4 Votes

Four to five-stories is a reasonable goal for updating this corner. The developer has cooperated with the dry-cleaner owner/seller by discussing community goals. (Wouldn't it be great if that was done more often, especially with the new houses going up in Morningside!) France Avenue and Sunnyside is a bustling corner and it seems that better controlled intersections in that area would be one benefit of this new development. The new structure on the Minneapolis side, to the south, doesn't look out of place at all and has not likely decreased that SW Mpls neighborhood's appeal in any way.

This dry-cleaner is an eyesore and an environmental risk that this developer would be taking out of the neighborhood. I doubt a two-story building could generate the revenue necessary to clean up the soil beneath its footprint. By removing the soil, putting in underground parking and retail on the first level, contaminated air risk is essentially eliminated. Imagine the reverse, taking down a modern four-story residential building, with yoga studios and brew pubs that the neighbors enjoy...for a one-story, falling apart,

36 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

contaminated dry-cleaning facility.

Also, maybe future empty-nesters wouldn't have to leave Morningside when we are ready to downsize. At the rate the little tear-downs are happening, what two-bedrooms will be available in this area? Sounds like Morningside would win by modernizing this corner in this way.

kerry kirvida · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 15, 2017 10:17 pm 5 Votes

Four to five stories seems reasonable in this busy, commercial area. The discussion should be less about height and more focus on how the project comes to life on the street level and how it will create vibrant street life and serve the neighbors. This project will add considerable value at the street level, regardless of height (3.4.5 stores...).

Christine Lund · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 15, 2017 10:29 pm 7 Votes

Let’s keep Edina moving forward!

As a life long Edina resident, and someone who currently resides on Sunnyside Road, I believe four stories is a very reasonable height for the proposed project in our neighborhood. The Edina Cleaners site has been a complete eye sore my entire life. This redevelopment, will totally reshape the neighborhood and the entry to the beautiful Morningside and Country Club neighborhoods.

I grew up in Edina and in a family where my father is a developer. He has built many projects that have become home to many Edina residents as they transition from their home to a condo or apartment. I know firsthand how important quality urban projects have been to people. Without quality urban places to move to, residents become trapped in their homes. And so many people love our neighborhoods of Edina and don’t want to leave. For example, a person who has lived for years in Country Club or Morningside neighborhoods don’t necessarily want to move Southdale or a surrounding suburb. They love it here. Why would we want them to leave our community? Let’s provide homes where they can transition and still be close to their family, grandchildren, parks, shopping, etc.

As a young professional I also know we want quality apartments close to the lakes, restaurants we frequent, 50th and France, etc. My friends and I don’t want to live in a non-descript remote suburban location that requires lots of driving. We want to stay close to everything without the hassle of driving long-distances. I know I would live at this project in a heart beat.

The developer has also worked with dozens of people from our neighborhood to modify the size and design of this project. He is going into this not tone-deaf and is taking into consideration other people's opinions and values.

Please continue to support high density development in Edina as you have in other areas of Edina.

If built, the success of this project will speak for itself. Full of Edina residents who love our community and want to be close to everything including their family.

37 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Please support this project.

Thank you! Christine Lund

Brian Pankratz · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 8:11 am 4 Votes

Height should be placed along major corridors like France Ave to take advantage of existing infrastructure. The proposed redevelopment will improve the existing area by bringing new amenities to the neighborhood and Edina.

Siobhan White · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · Oct 16, 2017 8:23 am 5 Votes

I agree it should remain two stories. This is part of a charming residential neighborhood. Higher than that would be out of proportion. And as others have said, the code should be specific in terms of floor and height, as floors with high ceilings could cast a bigger shadow.

Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 16, 2017 9:04 am

0 Votes

Four stories along N/S street, France, and 2 stories on E/W streets. France is a commercial Blvd. andI love that. I live in Edina because I can walk to amenities and would love even more businesses and services that I can walk to. I also like that taller building on France serve as a noise barrier to the homes behind it.

Keep in line with residentual building codes on E/W cross streets.

This can all be done very tastefully, with big, beautiful sidewalks, and generating lots of tax money to add more schools.

Jef Shoemate · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 9:14 am 4 Votes

3 to 4 stories on France seems reasonable and more sustainable than 2 stories. The area will be MORE charming with redevelopment.....take a good objective look next time you drive through....Scott Smith's comments above are right on, several blighted properties and wasted space. Redevelopments made so far have been positive (remember the liquor store before the new, modernized building?). Economically, it seems that less height (fewer units) works against both a quality build and sustainability. Fewer units would require higher rents, putting pressure on affordability and the likelihood of keeping local businesses.

Chari Porter · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · Oct 16, 2017 9:21 am 4 Votes

38 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

My vote is for a height restriction of 2-3 stories at the Edina Cleaners site. This property is directly adjacent to residential single story homes. I feel that a structure taller than 2- 3 stories would be too severe of a transition from commercial to residential. A taller building would restrict sunlight for the residences next to the commercial property, and also lower their property values. This is a residential area first and foremost with a commercial district, NOT a commercial district with a few residences. I have no issues with the site being redeveloped, but please keep in mind the historical nature of the area and allow for a graceful transition from commercial to residential. Again, I strongly support a height limit on this site to 2-3 stories.

Kathy Reilly · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 9:50 am 6 Votes

Agree with many of the responses advocating for 1-2 stories max! Morningside is a quaint & historic part of Edina with thriving neighborhood businesses. Let's do all we can to preserve that!

D. Feldman · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 16, 2017 10:05 am 5 Votes

I believe the charming character of Morningside, White Oaks, and Country Club increases the desire of people to move into our area. We do NOT need to become 50th & France. We benefit from upgrading our 1.5 and 2 story homes and keeping the scale we have, perhaps increasing the numbers of bungalows as a transition. We do not need additional traffic on our residential streets when we have no additional parking available.

Response: Jenifer Shoemate · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · Oct 24, 2017 8:47 pm The piece that is not being discussed here about our charming neighborhood, is that there are dangerous environmental contaminants beneath the dry cleaner that must be dealt with. If we do not support a multiple story (revenue-generating) development on that Property, the contamination can be ignored. Removing the contaminants beneath a historic gas station and dry cleaner will be costly. To be done correctly a development must be able to recoup costs. What one to two-story building can afford the remediation costs? Maybe a CVS? Not so charming.

Alex Gaustad · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 16, 2017 11:13 am 6 Votes

The height for this project that I feel is a comfortable height for this area would be 4-5 stories. This will be a good redevelopment project for the neighborhood. As a resident of this area that lives across the street from the project location, I know that this would only improve and re-shape the community and the area as a whole in a positive way. This project will continue to bring new opportunities to this area which I feel as though we want to see as being part of this community. There are buildings in very close proximity of where this project will take place that allows buildings at this height. I feel as though we should be doing the same in our community, to keep the current residents here and allow living options for them when that time comes and attract new residents that want to join our community and be a part of Edina!

39 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Let's continue to re-shape and re-develop Edina for the better! This is a project that is only going to help the community not hurt it! Keep the support going!

Thank You! Alex Gaustad

David Daly · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 21, 2017 1:10 pm 2 Votes

If density is what is economically necessary to redevelop the current Edina Cleaners site I'm in support of it. I think the City should be implementing a plan with "flexible" height requirements. We should be looking at this on a project-by-project basis with city officials and community input. I'll take the trade-off of 5 stories here for a cleaned-up corner so long as its well developed and the project can we an amenity to the area and built with material/architecture that fits with the fabric of the neighborhood.

Greg Daggett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · Oct 21, 2017 1:29 pm 2 Votes

I look to cities larger than Minneapolis like Chicago and then at what They have done well with neighborhoods adjacent to the city. With time, density will increase. People will not call Albert Lea a suburb and drive 90 minutes into work. With that said, we have a responsibility to be mindful of existing property, livelihood, etc. You can look to the Lincoln Park neighborhood and Lincoln Drive as to what France Ave. will someday look like as it runs out of the city. I support 4+ stories along France with a mindful transition to lower stories as we approach neighborhood lots. Green space should be a focus. Commercial/retail at ground level a must. Residential parking at 1-2x stalls:units should be included.

Response: Thomas Hoegh · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 28, 2017 8:11 am Greg, are you citing Chicago as an example to emulate and support high density housing??? I think you just made the best argument against it.

Ted Warner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Oct 23, 2017 6:59 am 1 Votes

I support this area at 4+ stories. My family and I drive brought here to linden hills every weekend and that area has continued to grow (up) and modernize while maintaining its neighborhood feel and charm and. It affecting local residents negatively. The 44th corner is already modernizing, why not make it A bit more like 50th? There are already plenty of great restaurants, a 4 story building would help create staying power.The border of Edina and Minneapolis staying at 2 stories seems old fashioned. This won’t turn the area into a zoo. Look at linden hills.

Matthew McGivney · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 26, 2017 9:37 am 1 Votes

40 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

This is a great neighborhood and has a lot going for it in terms of charm. Do not destroy it with tall buildings. Keep it to 4 stories max along the major roadways.

Kathy Robison · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · Oct 26, 2017 10:15 am 2 Votes

I would prefer a limit of two stories. I don't disagree with adding shops, but would like to see the charm of the area remain intact. 50th and France (by comparison) has spread; it's become a shopping center and has seen significantly increased traffic congestion. It would be a shame to see that happen to 44th and France. Once we start adding 4+ story buildings, we start the "progress" toward that end.

Sharon G · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 26, 2017 1:16 pm 0 Votes

Paul Nelson (Admin) "The developer is ready to go now, and has proposed a quality building looking to increase the demand to live in this neighborhood as well as bringing up the value of the surrounding real estate (I realize .. but there is a proposed development waiting in the wings". Tell them we'll get back to them when WE are ready, and when we get more than one proposal to review that are based on neighborhood preservation and not just return on the dollar.

Sharon G · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 26, 2017 1:31 pm 1 Votes

France Ave at 50th St. looks and feels like a canyon. I would like to see France at 44th limited to 3 stories with top 2 floors situated back from the front of the building. Widen sidewalks by moving new buildings back from the street. Any development that includes housing should require 2 parking spaces per unit in underground parking. Also parking for bicycles.

Thomas Hoegh · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 28, 2017 8:25 am 0 Votes

Look at the area around Excelsior & Grand: Many, many hundreds of apartments, only a few eateries aside from several fast food chains. Now look at 44th & France: Very few apartments, several eateries (no fast food chains). High density housing clearly doesn't create vitality. I actually like E&G, but I love living in Morningside because of the way it is. 2 stories max. Maybe a 3-story variance for an exceptional project on France.

Jon DeMars Victorsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 29, 2017 3:31 pm 0 Votes

Twenty-five years ago, we lived on France and 46th for 10 years with young children. Although we enjoyed the ability to walk to the stores, we had to keep a tight grip on our kids, because of unpredictable cars/drivers. We decided to move after a car passed between the open bus door and the curb where my son was stepping off. It's taken time, but there are now sidewalks, thank you.

41 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

With a good architect, 44th and France, can take a six story building.

Mark Schmidt · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 31, 2017 11:44 am 1 Votes

The zoning should not change and should stay at 2 stories. People have a right to rely on the zoning laws when they buy their homes and make investments, financially and emotionally, in their neighborhoods. To blow up the zoning laws and dramatically increase heights in an area zoned 2 stories would be a slap in the face to those that chose to buy their homes nearby. I left the greater urbanization of Chicago and chose Morningside near 44th and France precisely because of its smaller footprint and true neighborhood feel. 44th and France has shops that serve neighbors in their daily needs - blowing up height limits would inevitably goose the economics of the small area and turn our neighborhood into another high-brow area like 50th and France, which increasingly caters to destination luxury shoppers instead of neighbors -- that would destroy a great, unique and true "neighborhood" and there would be no going back. Also, some people advocating height may be unaware that the 44th and France "Small Area" sits at the top of a hill -- at the bottom of that hill, directly abutting the 44th and France Small Area, is the White Oaks neighborhood. From the White Oaks neighborhood, the existing 2 stories buildings already loom like 4 story buildings and the existing 1 story buildings like 3 story buildings. From that vantage point, adding a single story to the 44th and France Small Area is actually like adding 3 additional stories. From the perspective of White Oaks, looking up at the Small Area, a 4 story building would look like a 6 story building, a 5 story building would look like a 7 story building. That ignored vantage point underscores why it is indeed so important to have height limitations and keep them. Without the height limits, projects that just don't make sense in proportion to the neighborhood have a much higher likelihood of getting built, to the detriment of neighbors that bought their houses next to this historically two story area that is zoned for two stories.

Laurine Ford · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 31, 2017 12:25 pm 0 Votes

With height comes traffic. Short time traffic for shops (with more parking on the streets, regardless of how many official lots or ramps are provided). Long time traffic for residents. France already has traffic jams during rush hour. More development will make them worse. 44th is already a problem to get onto at certain times of day. Sunnyside will bear the brunt of this development, but we will all feel it.

stephanie mullaney · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 31, 2017 6:53 pm 0 Votes

Keep the charm of the area. 4 stories for buildings at the most. Also consider what this does to the CURRENT businesses in the area.

50TH & FRANCE 18 Answers · 1 Replies Currently in the 50th & France area, the building height is limited between four and six stories. What building height would you be comfortable

42 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

with and why?

Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Sep 22, 2017 6:49 pm 7 Votes

I support the status quo. Why change something that is clear and working.

Kristin Reichling · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Sep 28, 2017 7:20 pm 8 Votes

If the current Comprehensive Plan is clear regarding building heights, why is the city grappling with developer proposals? Why don't developers submit proposals that are aligned with our Comprehensive plan?

Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Sep 28, 2017 11:24 pm 7 Votes

The comp plan should not be amended to eliminate or increase building heights in the 50th France area. In fact, in light of recently approved development, I would argue they should be specifically reduced. This area is already congested with no room to expand infrastructure. Traffic will inevitably move to the residential neighborhoods to try and bypass congestion. This in turn affects the quiet enjoyment of those residents in their homes and creates potential safety issues for kids, pedestrians etc. As tonpstking, Surface parking is already limited and will be reduced further with current development. This in turn limits the enjoyment and accessibility of the area. This will negatively impact local businesses if parking is a hassle for patrons. In addition, it removes the charm. We must start using more common sense and weigh the consequences of decisions before it's too late.

greta simondet · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Sep 29, 2017 1:55 pm 2 Votes

I agree with Jennifer. 50th & France is not the place for increasing building heights. Taller buildings are best kept to Southdale and Pentagon Park areas.

Response: Mike Ebnet · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 02, 2017 11:31 am I live in the Southdale area. We don't want traffic congestion here either. Please rethink your last sentence.

Andrea Flom · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 08, 2017 9:01 am 0 Votes

Before any new building. Need more parking.

Bill Owens · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 08, 2017 10:19 am 4 Votes

43 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

4 stories max!

RICHARD A. MINER · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Oct 09, 2017 6:42 am 4 Votes

I agree with four story maximum to maintain the appeal of the area.

John Buttolph · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 09, 2017 12:19 pm 3 Votes

Maintain the status quo at 50th and France. As I understand it, the City has plans to dramatically increase density in the area through infill. Increasing height limits at the same time as increasing density will create an urban zone out of character with the charm which brings shoppers to this subarea.

Heather Wallace · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 11, 2017 8:39 am 2 Votes

Prior to opening this discussion, the city approved a 6 story apartment complex, it seems late to ask for opinions.

Barbara Wallace · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Oct 13, 2017 4:52 pm 2 Votes

Traffic here is always congested. Why are left turns allowed at all? I wouldn't like to see any buildings taller than the existing ones. The condos at the corner are already making the area look crowded. It sounds like the new building a block over is too big for the area.

Barb Rae · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 16, 2017 9:59 pm 1 Votes

I don't see any need to increase or change the height from what we have.

Eileen Supple · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 26, 2017 1:27 pm 0 Votes

Does the Comprehensive Plan say 4 to 6 stories max or did it effectively changed when a six-story project was approved? Seems odd to have a range as a maximum. I'd prefer no more than 3 stories and limit that to a) France between the new Market St. and 51st and b) 50th St. from France to Halifax.

Daniel Jennings · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 27, 2017 3:16 pm 1 Votes

Edina's the most coveted community within the 494 loop - highest property values are

44 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

the result of our family based neighborhoods, schools & proximity to Downtown Minneapolis. Currently the school board has no influence over how the city council and Hoveland approve additional property proposals that would have affects schools. As a Concord parent, I can confirm that there's literally no more room for additional kids.

If anyone is familiar with Hinsdale, IL ~ it's an upper bracket, established suburb of Chicago, that experienced the tear-down craze in the Reagan / Bush era. Their community leaders realized that preserving what they had was much more important than building high rises and strip malls... Go there today, 30 years post expansion and it's still a charming, quiet community with coveted schools and outrageous property values. I firmly feel that Edina will regret any of the proposed expansions that chip away at our family based neighborhoods.

Keep Edina's population at 50,000 - no highrises, no strip malls!

Bette Englund · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 29, 2017 5:20 pm 1 Votes

50th and France is a destination area. People come to the area BECAUSE it is charming, approachable in scope and has enough free parking available. I agree with the earlier comment about the Hinsdale area. If you want to keep an upper-bracket area with a reason to be in our area... maintain the height and density limits.

Hope Melton · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 31, 2017 10:43 am 0 Votes

We need to rethink this issue of density. As someone who lived 12 years in an inner ring suburb of Stockholm, Sweden, and recently spent a month there witnessing its building boom both there and in the city itself, I became aware of density's advantages. Multi- family buildings are far more energy efficient than single family dwellings, they support mass transit and take cars off the road, they leave space for parks, community gardens, bike paths and and pedestrian areas/public squares. They help build community--when diverse populations interact on a regular basis it enables relationships of mutual understanding, trust, and reciprocity.

I've also lived in Edina for almost 40 years so I understand its charm and the value of its residential neighborhoods. The question is whether very low density and sprawling neighborhoods of single family homes makes financial and environmental sense in the 21st century with its challenges of climate change, very high inequality, and increasing socioeconomic segregation.

Regarding 50th and France, I think 6-8 stories makes sense, especially if greater density is interspersed with green space and pedestrian ways.

Hope Melton · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Oct 31, 2017 1:33 pm 0 Votes

I should say as well that higher densities support affordable housing, an important issue in Edina.

45 of 46 Full Report Building Heights Closed Oct 31, 2017 · Discussion · 124 Participants · 5 Topics · 194 Answers · 36 Replies · 158 Votes

Yolanda Scharton · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Oct 31, 2017 7:05 pm 0 Votes

I believe building heights are being disregarded for reasons that are not economically feasible in the long run. Furthermore, much of the data put forth by the city and its hired researchers fail to acknowledge compelling and expert commercial real estate research that warns of overbuilding apartments and brick and mortar retail. Everday, we hear of retail merchants both local (note the local 50th and France closures: Cooks of Crocus Hill, The pizza restaurant across from cooks of Crocus Hill, etc) -- and national retailers as well, i. e. Southdale Center.

With more retail and the unnecessary apartment complex on 50th and France we are not going to get more community space or the city PR spin of attractive downtown Edina. Rather, we will get congestion, empty store fronts, and a compromised once cherished unique local environment for residents. I urge a more amended plan.

46 of 46 Full Report The CITY of EDINA

Speak Up, Edina! October Discussion: Building Heights The CITY of SpeakUpEdina.org EDINA

EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of Building Heights EDINA

In this discussion, the City posed the following questions:

• Currently in the 44th & France area, the building height is limited to two stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why? • Currently in the 50th & France area, the building height is limited between four and six stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why? • Currently in the 70th & Cahill area, the building height is limited between two and four stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why? • Currently in the Southdale area, the building height is limited between four and 12 stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why? • Currently in the Grandview area, the building height is limited to six stories. What building height would you be comfortable with and why?

EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of October Discussion EDINA

• Open Sept. 23-Oct. 31

• 194 comments made in total

• 1,565 users

• 66.5% of the sessions from new visitors

• 8,677 page views

EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of Grandview Summary EDINA

• Between four and six stories.

• Fix the congestion and traffic before allowing more height, and therefore density. • Utilize the Jerry’s tower as the maximum height. • Due to area’s topographic nature, height limits would vary by the location. • Make the area more walk and bike friendly. • Height isn’t as big of a deal in this area; focus on overall aesthetics.

EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of Southdale Summary EDINA

• Between four and 12 stories.

• Fix the congestion and traffic before allowing more height, and therefore density. • Follow current comp plan; if decide not to follow it, why have it. • The higher the building, the increase in visual obstruction, noise and light pollution and a increase in traffic. • Taller (12 stories max) buildings between France and York, shorter (four stories max) buildings as location approaches neighborhoods. • Bring density to Southdale and have dependable rapid transit.

EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY of 70th & Cahill Summary EDINA

• Between two and seven stories.

• Fix the congestion and traffic before allowing more height, and therefore density. • Heights should remain the same. Increased density = increased prices. This area is one of few areas in the city with naturally affordable housing. • Height limits should lower as the locations approach residential neighborhoods.

EdinaMN.gov 7 The CITY of 44th & France Summary EDINA

• Between two and five stories.

• Fix the congestion and traffic before allowing more height, and therefore density. • Height limits should lower as the locations approach residential neighborhoods. • Tall buildings take away from the character and charm of the area.

EdinaMN.gov 8 The CITY of 50th & France Summary EDINA

• Between three and four stories.

• Fix the congestion and traffic before allowing more height, and therefore density. • Increase parking before increasing density.

EdinaMN.gov 9 The CITY of In Summary EDINA

• Keep height limits in Comp Plan. • Keep height limits in all areas the same as in the previous Comp Plan. • Before ever increasing density, improve traffic congestion and parking. • Improve walkability of areas. • Concerns over the price of land increasing, therefore pricing out small businesses. • Maintain the emphasis on the importance of neighborhoods with families.

EdinaMN.gov 10 The CITY of Speak Up, Edina! EDINA

• November Discussion Topic:

Grandview Green Hwy 100 “lid”

EdinaMN.gov 11 The CITY of Speak Up, Edina! EDINA Questions?

SpeakUpEdina.org

EdinaMN.gov 12 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.B.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Joe Abood, General Manager Item Activity: Progress Report For Braemar Golf Course Discussion, Information Subject: Improvement Project

ACTION REQUESTED: No action required.

INTRODUCTION: Report to discuss the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Project status, timeline, budget and future opening possibilities. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Staff Report: Progress Report for Braemar Golf Course Improvement Project

Nov. 21, 2017

Mayor and City Council

Joseph Abood, General Manager

Progress Report for Braemar Golf Course Improvement Project

Construction Update: Mid-America Golf & Landscape began construction on the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Project in October 2016. As of the date of this report, seeding has been completed on eleven (11) of the eighteen (18) golf holes. This includes tee boxes, fairways, roughs and greens complexes. Irrigation work is approximately 95% complete, cart paths are about 75% complete and tree planting is about 65% complete. Mid-America will continue to work as long as weather permits going into the winter. Mid-America is tentatively scheduled to return on May 1, 2018 (weather permitting) to complete the construction phase of the project.

The construction progress to date represents a delay in the contracted substantial completion date as well as potentially impacting the opening date after the grow-in phase.

Mid-America has stated that the reasons for the delay are weather related.

Anticipated Remaining Schedule: Mid-America will continue to work on the project as long as weather permits into November 2017. When they return in the spring of 2018, they are projecting it will take 30 working days to complete the project.

May 2018 Complete irrigation work Seed remaining greens Seed remaining fairways Seed remaining tee boxes Seed native areas Complete cart path Complete tree plantings Build large practice green Build multi-use lawn area Repair winter erosion Project punch list

June 2018 Grow-in phase begins

STAFF REPORT Page 2

Weather Impact: During the golf course construction season of 2017 (April-October) the region experienced 75 recorded days of rain that adversely affected the contractors schedule. Precipitation YTD is 37.18 inches. Average precipitation YTD is 28.89 inches. What compounded the issue was the higher than average rainfall received in the extremely important “Seeding Window” (August-September) months.

STAFF REPORT Page 3

Course Opening Options: The following are potential opening options for the regulation course. All options are weather dependent and are subject to change.

• Planned opening August – Not likely • Open September for regular play – Not likely • Open September with limited play – Possible • Open September for 9-hole play – Possible • Open spring 2019 – Best case scenario for pristine conditions

Budget Impacts: The 2018 budget has a projected Operating Income/Loss of ($700,885). If the championship golf course remains closed for 2018 in its entirety, the new projected Operating Income/Loss will be ($1,304,837) . This equates to an additional Operating Income/Loss of ($603,952). There are several key line items associated with the additional loss. Bond Interest, Depreciation and a reduced Transfer in from Liquor Operation accounts for ($428,358) of the additional loss. Also, it is relevant to note that at the time the 2018 budget was written, the projected duration of the championship golf course closure was 50% of the year when in reality it needed to be 75% of the year. If this information was available, it would have increased the actual budgeted loss in 2018.

A plan has been created to reduce payroll and expenditures in any of the above scenarios to assist in minimizing the loss in 2018.

The total Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Project construction budget will continue to be under budget in any of the above scenarios as staff has been diligent throughout the process in value engineering and expense savings measures.

Restaurant RFP Schedule: Delays in the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Project could potentially delay the process of entering into a new agreement with a restaurant concessionaire. Staff will, however, continue with its original schedule for securing a new vendor.

November 2017 Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) and Contract

December 2017 Advertise RFP

January 2018 Deadline for RFP submission

February 2018 Interview potential vendors

March 2018 Award contract

Spring/Summer 2018 New concessionaire opens CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI.A.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Activity: PUBLIC HEARING: Lake Nancy Lake Association Action Subject: Request for City Coordinated Aquatic Services

ACTION REQUESTED: Approve staff to provide city-coordinated aquatic services for Lake Nancy and assess the cost back to properties per the request of the Lake Nancy Lake Association and the Lake and Pond Management Policy.

INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Staff Report

November 21, 2017

Mayor and City Council

Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator

PUBLIC HEARING: Lake Nancy Lake Association Request for City Coordinated Aquatic Services

Information / Background:

Lake Nancy Lake Association filed articles of incorporation with the state of Minnesota to form a nonprofit Lake Association in 2016. According to the City’s Lake and Pond Management Policy, eligibility for city- coordinated services requires greater than 50% of the residents living adjacent to a water body. According to the policy, the group is eligible for certain city-coordinated aquatic vegetation services. The cost of the services and coordination would be assessed annually to property owners adjacent to Lake Nancy.

Lake Nancy Lake Association’s request for aquatic services includes destruction of submerged aquatic vegetation to occur over two treatments, once in about mid-June and once in about mid-August. The request also includes city staff coordination of necessary DNR permits and securing a service provider to conduct the work. The services would be rendered in the summer of 2018.

The cost would be distributed equally among the 20 residential equivalent units shown in the attached map. The assessment would be a one-time annual assessment. Under the Lake and Pond Management Policy, the Lake Association may make annual requests for aquatic services with assessment hearings occurring each fall.

A public hearing was called because the Lake Association is newly formed and the group had not been assessed for services in the past.

STAFF REPORT Page 2

CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: VII.A.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Activity: 2017 Human Services Task Force Recommendation Action Subject: for 2018/2019 Funding

ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the 2018/2019 Human Services Funding recommendation as proposed by the 2017 Human Services Task Force.

INTRODUCTION: The 2018 budget is $91,532. The Task Force provides a recommendation to distribute $91,505. Please see the attached staff report and memo for details. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Staff Report - 2017 Human Services Task Force Recommendation 2017 Human Services Task Force Memo

November 21, 2017

Mayor and City Council

Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator

2017 Human Services Task Force Recommendation for 2018/2019 Funding

Information / Background:

The 2017 Task Force was comprised of 6 volunteer members:

• Kristina Martin, Task Force Chair (Human Rights & Relations Commission) • Erik Ruthruff (Edina Transportation Commission) • Amanda Herr (Community Health Commission) • Brian Berube (Construction Board of Appeals) • Cheryl Gunness (Arts & Culture Commission) • Patrick Willette (Parks & Recreation Commission)

The Task Force was engaged in August to review and provide feedback for staff to incorporate into the Request for Proposal. The group convened 3 times over the course of October and November:

• Monday, October 9 – The Task Force elected a chair, reviewed proposals, and developed the selection process. • Monday, October 30 – The Task Force heard presentations from organizations who have requested funding. • Thursday, November 9 – The Task Force drafted a memo with recommendations for funding.

A copy of the Human Services Task Force funding recommendation memo is attached.

Department Name Phone 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 • EdinaMN.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 To: Mayor and City Council cc: From: 2017 Human Services Task Force Subject: 2018/2019 Human Services Funding Recommendations

The 2017 Human Services task force weighed the proposals given to us from a perspective of what the community of Edina needs in terms of support. We used amounts awarded in previous Human Services task force recommendations as a guideline, but did not feel we need to match the same percentage, or amount distributed in previous years. We tried to ensure funding was given equally to groups that focused on youth, seniors, hunger/food, and social services. We feel our recommendation aligns well with the needs of the Edina community. We think that the opportunity for non-profit organizations to receive funding from future Human Services Task Forces should be better publicized; we only received six proposals this year. We recommend that the city also advertise future RFPs requests in the About Town publication, and that the city add the open enrollment and closing deadline dates on the City of Edina website calendar, with a link to the application. We think RFPs for organizations focused on community support areas, such as mental health, were missing in the range of proposals we received this year. We thank you for the opportunity to take part in this process and the opportunity to give back to our community.

Requested Recommend Organization per Year Funding per Justification/Rationale (2018, 2019) Year

VEAP ● VEAP gets funding from other funding sources and other communities ● VEAP just completed strategic planning and cut some services (transportation for medical appointments); we would like to see how their new mission and goals will impact the Edina community $30,000.00 $20,550.00 ● Would like to see more of an effort around outreach of their services, as opposed to only donations and volunteering outreach ● VEAP will receive more funding from the 2017 Human Services task force than other groups we funded

City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Page 2

Oasis for Youth ● In the Edina Schools and communities ● Proactively working to find solutions to the challenges of homeless youth ● Focused on “boots on the ground outreach” and $2,500.00 $3,000.00 collaboration with many other organization ● This group was wrongly informed about the amount of support they can request; they should request additional support in the future ● We want to see what they can do to grow their work

Beacon Interfaith ● Great work at 66 West ● Serves multiple communities $15,000.00 $13,005.00 ● Specialized services ● Excited to see what they are going to do in the coming years

Cornerstone Advocacy  Fills an important role in the Edina community Service  Support residents in a first responder role providing immediate support $20,000.00 $20,000.00  Strong collaboration with the Edina police department and other community organizations  Follow-up support provided to ensure client’s long- term success

Senior Community  Organization has 40 years of support services Services focused on seniors in Edina  Well-established and known in the community $21,000.00 $19,950.00  Delivers on both follow-up and follow through, partnering with the seniors of Edina long term  Funding this organization provides Edina residents with a multifaceted service

Normandale Center for ● Specialized approach Healing and Wholeness $15,000.00 $15,000.00 ● Based in and focused on the Edina community ● Provides support for both seniors in Edina and their caregivers

Totals $103,500.00 $ 91,505.00

City of Edina • 4801 W. 50 th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: VII.B.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject: Public Engagement Plan For Arden Park Action

ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the plan for community engagement for the Arden Park design phase.

INTRODUCTION: Please see attached staff report and public process summary. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Arden Park Public Engagement Plan Staff Report Arden Park Public Process Summary

Nov. 21, 2017

Mayor and City Council

Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director

Public Engagement Plan for Arden Park

Information / Background: On Sept. 19, 2017 the City Council approved the Memorandum of Understanding with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the concept plan for the renovation of Arden Park. At that meeting the City Council requested a timeline and proposed public process for the design phase of the project which is expected to begin in December 2017. A proposed schedule is attached. Julie Strother and Eileen McAwley are Parks & Recreation Commissioners assigned to this project on the Parks & Recreation Commission Work Plan. Staff will also be asking commissioners to participate in a working group to design the park shelter building and a working group to design the playground.

On November 14, 2017 the Parks & Recreation Commission was asked to review and recommend the public engagement plan for Arden Park. The Commission was very supportive and voted to approve this plan. The only concern expressed was the timing of a final open house in August when it is difficult to find a good time with back to school, vacations and the Minnesota State Fair. Staff will work to find an acceptable meeting date in August 2018. Design Process Summary 2017 2018 2019

Phase Tast Notes Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Stream alignment Review 1 will focus on Tree preservation issue/resolution of stream Value Engineering - Geotechnical analysis alignment, tree 30% Design Bridge and pavilion study preservation, stormwater Stormwater concept layout, BMP footprint and concept footprint

Open house suggested prior to Park Commission Public Review -1 Public Open House meeting on same night Park Commission 01/09/18 Edina Council Briefing 01/17/18 MCWD Board Briefing 01/25/18 Building demolition plans Creek terrace at pavilion Trail layout and details Overlook terraces and creek access points 50% Design Development Stormwater management design Hydraulogic and hydraulic modeling Creek channel details Opinion of probable construction cost Suggested in the Park on Public Open House Saturday 5/5/18 Open house suggested prior to Park Commission Public Review - 2 meeting on same night Park Commission 5/8/18 Edina Council Review 05/15/18 MCWD Board Action 05/24/18 Respond to 50% comments 90% Design Technical specifications and Development project details Permit decisions Suggested in the Park in Public Open House mid to late August 2018

Park Commission 09/04/18 Action for approval of design, permits, and Public Review - 3 authorization to bid Edina Council Action 9/20/2018 Action for approval of design, permits, and authorization to bid MCWD Board Action 9/27/2018 100% Design 10/15/18 Bidding 11/1/18 - 12/10/18

Bid Award Edina Council Action 12/19/18

MCWD Board Action 12/28/18

Phase 1 Construction Notice to Proceed 01/04/19

Park Shelter Design PARC Working Group 2/1/2018 - 12/31/2018

Phase 2 Park shelter Construction 5/27/19 - 11/8/19

Playground Design PARK Working Group 8/1/2018 - 12/31/2018 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: VII.C.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Edina Chamber of Commerce Request for Action Subject: Modification of Lodging Tax Agreement

ACTION REQUESTED: Approve new Convention & Visitors Bureau agreement with Edina Chamber of Commerce.

INTRODUCTION: The Edina City Council approved Ordinance 2014-04 imposing a 3% lodging tax on April 22, 2014. Immediately following this action, the City Council approved an agreement with the non-profit organization called Explore Edina which was established by the Edina Chamber of Commerce to act as the City’s official Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB). Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.190, the ordinance allowed the City to impose the lodging tax and collect the proceeds, and the agreement authorized the distribution of 95% of the proceeds to the Chamber of Commerce in order to provide the City with CVB-related services through vehicle of Explore Edina.

On September 19, 2017, I received written notification of the Chamber’s intention to disband and dissolve Explore Edina. The Chamber is moving forward with a large scale organizational change and wishes to disband Explore Edina and take on the CVB duties itself. I have participated in discussions with the Chamber of Commerce concerning this proposed change. The new agreement, which is entitled ‘Agreement for Convention & Visitors Bureau Services’ has been drafted by the City Attorney and accepted by the Chamber of Commerce, makes the following material changes from the current Explore Edina agreement:

The flow of lodging tax proceeds will go directly to the Edina Chamber of Commerce and accounted for within the Chamber’s budget. The Explore Edina Board of Directors will be dissolved, effective January 1, 2018. The City will be represented on the Chamber Board of Directors by the City Manager, or his/her designee. Currently the City has is represented on the Chamber Board by the City Manager and on the Explore Edina Board by the City Manager and the Mayor. The Chamber must submit its proposed budget annual operating budget to the City Council for approval prior to November 1st of each year. The current agreement requires this action by September 1. The new agreement requires the Chamber to have an annual financial audit of performed by an independent certified public accounting firm when total combined revenues from all sources for the year exceed $750,000. The Chamber shall furnish a copy of this annual financial audit to the City at no cost to the City. The current agreement requires a financial audit with no qualifier threshold based on annual revenues.

The City is obliged under Minnesota Statutes 469.190 to ensure that lodging taxes collected for the purpose of funding a CVB are spent on lawful purposes under the statute. Cities have options to provide for CVB services. Some cities provide CVB services with City staff. I believe the Edina Chamber of Commerce is equipped with the right combination of staff and Board members to effectively carry out Edina’s CVB services. I recommend the City Council approve the proposed Agreement for Convention & Visitors Bureau Services with the Edina Chamber of Commerce.

ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Ordinance 2014-04 Original CVB Agreement with Explore Edina New Agreement for CVB Services with Edina Chamber of Commerce Letter from Edina Chamber of Commerce dated Sept 19, 2017 Combined Balance Sheet for Edina Chamber of Commerce/Explore Edina dated Sept 30, 2017 ORDINANCE NO. 2014-04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING A LOCAL LODGING TAX

THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:

Section 1. Section 20-384 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following definitions:

Lodging means the furnishing for consideration of lodging at a hotel, motel, rooming house, tourist court, or resort, other than the renting or leasing of it for a continuous period of thirty (30) calendar days or more.

Operator means a person who provides lodging to others, or any office, agent or employee of such person.

Section 2. Chapter 20, Article VII of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following Section:

Section 20-388. Lodging Tax

(a) Imposition of Tax.

There is hereby imposed a tax of three percent (3%) on the gross receipts from the furnishing for consideration of lodging.

(b) Collection.

Each operator shall collect the tax imposed by this Section at the time rent is paid. The tax collections shall be held in trust by the operator for the City. The amount of tax shall be separately stated from the rent charged for the lodging.

The taxes imposed by this Section shall be paid by the operator to the City not later than twenty-five (25) calendar days after the end of the month in which the taxes were collected. At the time of payment the operator shall submit a return upon such forms and containing such information as the City may require. The return shall contain the following minimum information:

(1) The total amount of rent collected for lodging during the period covered by the return.

(2) The amount of tax required to be collected and due for the period.

(3) The signature of the person filing the return or that of his agent duly authorized in writing.

(4) The period covered by the return.

(5) The amount of uncollectible rental charges subject to the lodging tax.

The operator may take a credit against taxes payable the amount of taxes previously paid for rent that was not actually collected.

Ordinance No. 2014-04 Page 2

(d) Examination of Returns, Adjustments, Notices, Demands and Audit.

After a return is filed, the City shall examine it and make any investigation or examination of the records and accounts of the person making the return deemed necessary for determining its correctness including a formal audit. The tax computed on the basis of such examination shall be the tax to be paid. If the tax due is found to be greater than that paid, such excess shall be paid to the City within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of a notice thereof given either personally or sent by registered mail to the address shown on the return. If the tax paid is greater than the tax found to be due, the excess shall be refunded to the person who paid the tax to the City within ten (10) calendar days after determination of such refund.

(e) Refunds.

Any person may apply to the City for a refund of taxes paid for a prescribed period in excess of the amount legally due for that period, provided that no application for refund shall be considered unless filed within one year after such tax was paid, or within one year from the filing of the return, whichever period is the longer. The City shall examine the claim and make and file written findings thereon denying or allowing the claim in whole or in part and shall mail a notice thereof by registered mail to such person at the address stated upon the return. If such claim is allowed in whole or in part, the City shall credit the amount of the allowance against any taxes due under this Section from the claimant and the balance of the allowance, if any, shall be paid by the City to the claimant.

(f) Failure to File a Return.

If any operator required by this Section to file a return shall fail to do so within the time prescribed, or shall make, willfully or otherwise, an incorrect, false, or fraudulent return, the operator shall, upon written notice and demand, file such return or corrected return within five (5) calendar days of receipt of such written notice and shall at the same time pay any tax due on the basis thereof. If such person shall fail to file such return or corrected return, the City shall make a return or corrected return, for such person from such knowledge and information as the City can obtain, and assess a tax on the basis thereof, which tax (less any payments theretofore made on account of the tax for the taxable period covered by such return) shall be paid within five (5) calendar days of the receipt of written notice and demand for such payment. Any such return or assessment made by the City shall be prima facie correct and valid, and such person shall have the burden of establishing its incorrectness or invalidity in any action or proceeding in respect thereto. If any portion of a tax imposed by this Section is not paid within thirty (30) calendar days after it is required to be paid, the City Attorney may institute such legal action as may be necessary to recover the amount due plus interest, and costs and disbursements. Upon a showing of good cause, the City may grant an operator one thirty (30) day extension of time within which to file a return and make payment of taxes as required by this Section provided that interest during such period of extension shall be added to the taxes due at the rate of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month.

(g) Interest.

The amount of tax not timely paid shall bear interest at the rate of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month from the time such tax should have been paid until paid. Any interest shall be added to the tax and be collected as part thereof.

(h) Violations.

Ordinance No. 2014-04 Page 3

Any person who shall willfully fail to make a return required by this Section; or who shall fail to pay the tax after written demand for payment, or who shall fail to remit the taxes collected or any interest imposed by this Section after written demand for such payment or who shall refuse to permit the City to examine the books, records and papers under his or her control, or who shall willfully make any incomplete, false or fraudulent return shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

(i) Use of Proceeds.

Ninety-five percent (95%) of the proceeds obtained from the collection of taxes pursuant to this Section shall be used in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section 469.190 as the same may be amended from time to time to fund a local convention or tourism bureau for the purpose of marketing and promoting the City as a tourist or convention center.

(j) Appeals.

Any operator aggrieved by any notice, order or determination made by the City under this Section may file a petition for review of such notice, order or determination detailing the operator's reasons for contesting the notice, order or determination. The petition shall contain the name of the petitioner, the petitioner's address and the location of the lodging subject to the order, notice or determination. The petition for review shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days after the notice, order or determination for which review is sought has been mailed or served upon the person requesting review. Upon receipt of the petition the City Manager, or the Manager's designee, shall set a date for a hearing and give the petitioner at least five (5) calendar days' prior written notice of the date, time and place of the hearing. At the hearing, the petitioner shall be given an opportunity to show cause why the notice, order or determination should be modified or withdrawn. The petitioner may be represented by counsel of petitioner's choosing at petitioner's own expense. The hearing shall be conducted by the City Manager or the Manager's designee, provided only that the person conducting the hearing shall not have participated in the drafting of the order, notice or determination for which review is sought. The person conducting the hearing shall make written findings of fact and conclusions based upon the applicable sections of this Section and the evidence presented. The person conducting the hearing may affirm, reverse or modify the notice, order or determination made by the City. Any decision rendered by the City Manager pursuant to this subdivision may be appealed to the City Council. A petitioner seeking to appeal a decision must file a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days after the decision has been mailed to the petitioner. The matter will thereupon be placed on the Council agenda as soon as is practical. The Council shall then review the findings of fact and conclusions to determine whether they were correct. Upon a determination by the Council that the findings and conclusions were incorrect, the Council may modify, reverse or affirm the decision of the City Manager or his designee upon the same standards as set forth in this subdivision.

Section 3. This ordinance is effective on July 1, 2014 following its passage and publication.

First Reading: April 1, 2014 Second Reading: April 22, 2014 Published: May 8, 2014

Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor

PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT, THURSDAY, MAY 8, 2016 SEND TWO AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK

AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this _____ day of ______, 2017 by and between the City of Edina , a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “City” and the Edina Chamber of Commerce, a Minnesota non-profit corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Chamber”.

WHEREAS , the City has imposed a tax on lodging to fund a local tourism and convention bureau to promote the City as a tourist and convention center in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 469.190; and

WHEREAS , the Chamber has the staff, facility and experience to carry out the objectives of promoting the City as a destination for all forms of tourism, including visitors, meetings, conferences and conventions.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term . The term of this Agreement shall commence on the January 1, 2018 and shall continue until cessation by mutual agreement or until withdrawal by one of the parties hereto in accordance with the following provisions:

A. The party withdrawing from this Agreement shall provide the other party written notice to that effect.

B. Withdrawal shall be effective three hundred sixty five (365) days after written notice of withdrawal is given.

C. Upon the effective date of the withdrawal the Chamber shall promptly remit to the City all proceeds held by the Chamber generated from the lodging tax imposed under City ordinance. The City must use the remitted proceeds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 469.190.

2. Services Rendered by Chamber . The Chamber shall furnish the following services as funds allow and as specified in its budget:

A. Informational services in responding to inquiries about the City via U.S. Mail, computer (internet), telephone and personal contacts.

B. Provide planning, coordination and registration assistance to organizations, business and groups.

1 194662v1

C. Supply support material, including but not limited to name badges, maps, accommodations lists and information in general.

D. Prepare and present audiovisual presentations to groups to attract visitors, meetings, convention and special events to the City and the area.

E. Distribute brochures, maps and guides of the City/area to potential visitors and to meeting and event planners.

F. Provide representation at trade shows, conventions and exhibits to attract new visitors to the City.

G. Promote the City as a destination through statewide, regional, national and international advertising and marketing of the City and the area’s hospitality industry and attractions.

H. Promote and support local festivals and special events.

3. Charges . Basic services provided pursuant to Paragraph Two (2) of this Agreement shall be without charge to the person or organization utilizing such services, unless authorized by contractual agreement or action of the Chamber’s Board of Directors.

4. Budget . The Chamber shall submit its annual operating budget for expenditures of the proceeds of the lodging tax for review and approval by the City prior to November 1 st of each year. Such budget shall detail specifically the uses to which monies received shall be spent to provide some or all of the services as described in Paragraph Two (2) of this Agreement.

It is understood between the parties that the actual revenues being generated under Paragraph Five (5) may vary from the amounts anticipated in the budget. For this reason, it is agreed that the budget may be modified without prior consent of the City, provided that any adjustments shall be made by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the Chamber’s Board of Directors.

Notwithstanding any other language to the contrary, the Chamber shall not expend any sums beyond its revenues.

5. Funding . On or near the 15 th day of each month, the City shall remit to the Chamber, for funding of the Chamber, ninety-five percent (95%) of the lodging tax payments received by the City, less refunds, in the preceding month during the term of this Agreement.

6. Verification of Expenditures . The Chamber will provide the City a copy of the Chamber’s annual financial statements documenting receipt and expenditures of the

2 194662v1

lodging tax, properly itemized and verified by the Chamber’s president. The chief financial officer of the City shall have the right to access the official financial books and organizational records of the Chamber at any time during normal business hours, provided forty-eight (48) hours notification to Chamber’s president or treasurer, to audit any items of revenue or expenditure.

7. Hold Harmless . Any and all employees of the Chamber or any other persons, while engaged in the performance of any service required by the Chamber under this Agreement, shall not be considered employees of the City, and any or all claims that may or might arise under the Workers’ Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the Chamber, or its agents or employees or other persons while engaged in any of the services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the obligation or the responsibility of the City. In connection therewith, the Chamber hereby agrees to indemnify, save and hold harmless, and defend the City and all of its officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims, demands, actions, or causes of actions of whatever nature or character arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the services provided for in this Agreement, except to the extent such claims or liability arise from the gross negligence or intentional misconduct of the City or its agents.

8. Discrimination . The Chamber, in providing services hereunder shall comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statute, Section 181.59 as the same may be amended from time to time. The Chamber shall not discriminate against any person or firm in any of its activities pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Section 181.59 which is incorporated into this Agreement as though set forth in its entirety.

9. Insurance . The Chamber shall carry insurance to cover its employees and agents while performing services pursuant to this Agreement. Such insurance shall provide comprehensive general liability and property damage coverage to the Chamber and its employees and agents in such amounts as will equal the applicable limits of liability to which the City may be held pursuant to state statute as the same may be amended from time to time. The Chamber shall also carry Workers’ Compensation as required by Minnesota Statute, Section 176.182 and provide the City with proof of compliance with Section 176.182 to commencement of services thereunder.

10. Board Members . The Edina City Manager and the Edina Mayor must be members of the Board of Directors of the Edina Chamber of Commerce.

3 194662v1

11. Laws . The Chamber will comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws in the performance of its obligations hereunder.

12. Advertisement . All brochures, listings, or advertisements of specific lodging facilities shall include mention of all facilities paying the lodging tax imposed by the City.

13. Integration . This document is fully integrated, embodying the entire Agreement between the parties. Any amendment to this Agreement shall be in writing and executed in the same manner as the Agreement.

14. Amendment . This Operating Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of both parties.

15. Audit . The Chamber shall have an annual financial audit of the Chamber performed by an independent certified public accounting firm when total combined revenues from all sources for the year exceed $750,000. The Chamber shall furnish a copy of this annual financial audit to the City at no cost to the City.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF EDINA

By: Dated: James Hovland, Mayor

By: Dated: Scott Neal, City Manager

EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

By: Dated: Its Chair of the Board

By: Dated: Its ______

4 194662v1 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

September 19, 2017

Edina City Hall Attn: Scott Neal 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424

Dear Mayor Hovland, City Manager Neal and Members of the Edina City Council: There is currently an Agreement dated April 23, 2014, between the City of Edina and Explore Edina. This letter is to inform you that effective January 1, 2018, Explore Edina will dissolve as a non- profit corporation and will merge its activities with the Edina Chamber of Commerce. While the Edina Chamber of Commerce will be the primary legal entity, all activities and responsibilities currently performed under Explore Edina will continue uninterrupted under the Edina Chamber of Commerce umbrella. This new organizational structure will allow us to develop a strategic plan that takes advantages of the synergies between the two organizations and more effectively utilize financial and human resources. The City of Edina and its business community will be better served through the new combined entity. Please note the following: • The "Explore Edina" brand will continue to be used in our marketing efforts. This will ensure continuity and brand awareness. • All of the services currently listed in our agreement with the City will remain unchanged with the important addition of providing economic development support to the City of Edina. Specifics of this service will be agreed upon by the Edina Chamber of Commerce and the City of Edina. • Financial reporting will remain the same. The Edina Chamber of Commerce will continue to provide detailed monthly financial statements to the city's representative outlining the lodging revenue and expenses associated with marketing the city. The Edina Chamber will also provide updates to the Edina City Council as outlined in our current agreement. In order to maintain open lines of communication with the City of Edina, a representative from the City will continue serve on the Edina Chamber of Commerce board of directors. We respectfully request that the Agreement be amended to reflect the foregoing change in structure of Explore Edina and the Edina Chamber of Commerce.

Sincerely,

Lori Syverson Joel Hilgendorf Tim Murphy President Board Chair Board Chair Edina Chamber of Commerce Explore Edina

3300 Edinborough Way, Suite 150 • Edina, MN 55435 • (952) 806-9060 Edina Chamber of Commerce/Explore Edina Combined Balance Sheet September 30, 2017

Edina Chamber Explore Edina Combined ASSETS Current Assets Total Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 30,553.69 $ 151,734.25 $ 182,287.94 Accounts Receivable - 86,940.00 86,940.00 Total Current Assets 30,553.69 238,674.25 269,227.94

Fixed Assets Office Furniture 17,706.13 7,556.17 25,262.30 Office Equipment 10,597.23 10,597.23 Computer Equipment 37,195.11 37,195.11 Accumulated Depreciation (61,623.75) (7,556.17) (69,179.92) Total Fixed Assets 3,874.72 3,874.72

Other Assets Security Deposit 2,274.46 2,274.46 Total Other Assets 2,274.46 2,274.46 TOTAL ASSETS 36,702.87 $ 238,674.25 $ 275,377.12

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Liabilities Current Liabilities Accounts Payable $ $ 525.00 525.00 Payroll Withholding and Benefits 1,015.72 1,015.72 Total Current Liabilities 1,015.72 525.00 1,540.72 Total Liabilities 1,015.72 525.00 1,540.72

Equity Unrestricted Net Assets 58,410.19 143,711.47 202,121.66 Board Designated-Marketing Cont 20,000.00 20,000.00 Board Designated-Emerg Res Fund 60,000.00 60,000.00 Net Income (22,723.04) 14,437.78 (8,285.26) Total Equity 35,687.15 238,149.25 273,836.40 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $ 36,702.87 $ 238,674.25 $ 275,377.12

No Assurances Given Edina Chamber of Commerce/Explore Edina September 30, 2017 Chamber Explore Combined YTD YTD YTD Revenues: Dues: New $ 3,650.00 $ $ 3,650.00 Process Fee 400.00 400.00 Renewals 22,765.00 22,765.00 Voluntary Contribution 1,358.50 1,358.50 Total Dues 28,173.50 28,173.50

Lodging Tax 330,195.15 330,195.15 General Meetings 13,580.00 13,580.00 Promotion and Communications 4,513.60 4,513.60 Strategic Planning Fund Programming Revenue 1,755.00 1,755.00 Financial 3,038.46 363.32 3,401.78 Event Revenue 10,368.00 10,368.00 Grant Revenue 7,376.00 7,376.00 Special Programming - Revenue Taste of Edina 299.00 299.00 Golf 18,280.00 18,280.00 Gala 250.00 250.00 41,716.06 348,302.47 390,018.53 Total Revenue 69,889.56 348,302.47 418,192.03

Net Expense Expenses: General Membership Meetings 7,129.81 7,129.81 Promotion/Communications Exp 17.56 137,246.06 137,263.62 Programming Expenses 950.60 950.60 Sponsorships 6,400.00 6,400.00 Public Relations 2,446.27 2,446.27 Special Programming: Taste of Edina 25.52 25.52 Golf 14,367.10 14,367.10 Fashion Show 28,193.28 28,193.28 22,490.59 174,285.61 196,776.20

Payroll 41,264.95 100,115.67 141,380.62 Taxes and Benefits 5,520.72 16,823.42 22,344.14 Occupancy Costs 7,726.87 14,899.50 22,626.37 insurance 1,879.22 1,322.00 3;201.22 Business Expenses 2,031.87 5,555.97 7,587.84 Office Supplies 1,056.41 828.32 1,884.73 Communication/Technology Exp 2,318.37 2,958.23 5,276.60 Dues, Subscriptions, Education Expense 331.99 8,137.17 8,469.16 Financial and Admin Expense 7,526.64 8,122.76 15,649.40 Board of Directors 816.04 816.04 Depreciation 464.97 464.97 70,122.01 159,579.08 229,701.09

Net Income (Loss) $ (22,723.04) $ 14,437.78 $ (8,285.26)

No Assurances Given CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: VII.D.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Don Uram, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject: Resolution Nos. 2017-129 and 2017 - 130 Authorizing Action Issuance and Awarding the Sale of $9,480,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2017C and Awarding the Sale and Providing for the Payment of $1,640,000 General Obligation Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2017D.

ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution Nos. 2017-129 and 2017-130 Authorizing Issuance and Awarding the Sale of $9,480,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2017C and Awarding the Sale and Providing for the Payment of $1,640,000 General Obligation Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2017D.

INTRODUCTION: Attached are the resolutions awarding the sale of bonds as drafted by the City's bond counsel, Dorsey & Whitney. Also included are the Bond Rating Reports from Moody's and S&P. Both agencies reaffirmed Edina's AAA bond rating.

The purpose of this bond issuance was to refund the G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2009A and the G.O. Recreational Revenue Bonds, Series 2009C. These bonds were originally issued to finance the City's public works facility and to finance improvements to the Braemar Ice Facility. The refunding is expected to reduce debt service expense by approximately $1.4 million over the next 12 years. Debt service will continue to be paid from a dedicated ad valorem property tax levy and from ice arena revenues.

Bids for the Bonds Series 2017D (private placement) will be received by the City on November 20. The bids for the 2017C bonds (public offering) will be received and both will be tabulated by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates. Ehlers and City staff will present the bids to the City Council at the November 21 Council meeting.

ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Resolution 2017-129 Resolution No. 2017 - 130 Moody's Rating Report S&P Rating Report Saving Report PResentation

CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $9,480,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2017C

Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota

Governing Body: City Council

Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on November 21, 2017, at 7:00 p.m., at the City Hall in Edina, Minnesota.

Members Present:

Members Absent:

Documents Attached:

Minutes of said meeting (including):

RESOLUTION NO. 2017-129

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $9,480,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2017C

I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law.

WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this ____ day of November, 2017.

______Debra Mangen, City Clerk

4851-3257-9924\2 It was reported that [______] ([___]) proposals had been received prior to 11:00 a.m., Central Time, on November 21, 2017, for the purchase of the $9,480,000 General

Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2017C of the City in accordance with the Official Statement distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The proposals have been read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows:

Bid for Interest Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost

[See Attached]

4851-3257-9924\2 Councilmember ______introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:

RESOLUTION NO. 2017-129

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $9,480,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2017C

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the “Council”) of Edina, Minnesota, (the “City”), as follows:

Section 1. Authorization and Sale.

1.01. Authorization of Bonds. This Council hereby determines that it is in the best interest of the City to issue its $9,480,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2017C (the “Bonds”), for the purpose of refunding in advance of maturity and prepaying on February 1, 2018 (the “Redemption Date”) the 2019 through 2030 maturities, aggregating $9,480,000 in principal amount, of the City’s General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2009A, dated, as originally issued, as of April 29, 2009 (the “Refunded Bonds”). The refunding of the Refunded Bonds is being carried out for the purposes described in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, subdivision 3, subsection (b)(2)(i) and in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475.

This Council hereby determines to issue and sell the Bonds to defray the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in refunding the Refunded Bonds, including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65.

1.02. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., as an independent municipal advisor to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Official Statement for the Bonds, proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The most favorable proposal received is that of [______] of [______, ______] (“Purchaser”), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $[______], plus accrued interest in the amount of $[______], the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The Purchaser’s good faith deposit shall be retained and deposited by the City until the Bonds have been delivered and shall be deducted from the purchase price paid at settlement.

1.03. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things that are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having

4851-3257-9924\2 happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith.

Section 2. Bond Terms; Registration; Execution and Delivery.

2.01. Maturities; Interest Rates; Denominations; Payment. The Bonds shall be designated General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2017C; shall be originally dated as of December 14, 2017; shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof; shall mature on February 1 in the respective years and amounts stated below; and shall bear interest computed on the basis of a 360-day year composed of twelve 30- day months from the date of issuance until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows:

Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 2019 $750,000 2025 $880,000 2020 795,000 2026 900,000 2021 810,000 2027 915,000 2022 830,000 2028 935,000 2023 845,000 2029 955,000 2024 865,000

[REVISE MATURITY SCHEDULE FOR ANY TERM BONDS]

The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar for the Bonds appointed herein, provided that, so long as the Bonds are registered in the name of a securities depository, or a nominee thereof, in accordance with Section 2.08 hereof, principal and interest shall be payable in accordance with the operational arrangements of the securities depository.

2.02. Interest Payment Dates. Upon initial delivery of the Bonds and upon any subsequent transfer or exchange pursuant to Section 2.03, the date of authentication shall be noted on each Bond so delivered, exchanged or transferred. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on each February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 2018, to the owner of record as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day.

2.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the “Registrar”). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows:

(a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged.

4851-3257-9924\2 (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date.

(c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney in writing.

(d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City.

(e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized.

(f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner’s order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid.

(g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange.

4851-3257-9924\2 to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment.

(i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended.

(j) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange.

2.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association of St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with the Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon at least thirty (30) days’ notice and upon the appointment and acceptance of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Board, the City Clerk shall transmit to the Registrar from the Bond Fund described in Section 4.01 hereof, moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due.

2.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the year 2027 and thereafter shall be subject to call for prior redemption at the option of the City, in whole or in part, in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds having the same maturity date, on February 1, 2026, and any date thereafter, at the price of par plus accrued interest as of the date of redemption.

[COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS IF THERE ARE TERM BONDS]

[The Bonds shall be subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the years shown below, in the following principal amounts:

Term Bonds Maturing in 20 Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amount

4851-3257-9924\2 The remaining $______stated principal amount shall be paid at maturity on February 1, 20__.

Term Bonds Maturing in 20 Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amount

The remaining $______stated principal amount shall be paid at maturity on February 1, 20__.]

The City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for redemption thereof to be published if and as required by law and not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be mailed by first-class mail to the registered holders of any Bonds to be redeemed at their addresses as they appear on the bond register described in Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding.

Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered.

Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall

4851-3257-9924\2 be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price.

2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed or printed in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

2.08. Securities Depository.

(a) For purposes of this section the following terms shall have the following meanings:

“Beneficial Owner” shall mean, whenever used with respect to a Bond, the person in whose name such Bond is recorded as the beneficial owner of such Bond by a Participant on the records of such Participant, or such person’s subrogee.

“Cede & Co.” shall mean Cede & Co., the nominee of DTC, and any successor nominee of DTC with respect to the Bonds.

“DTC” shall mean The Depository Trust Company of New York, New York.

“Participant” shall mean any broker-dealer, bank or other financial institution for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository.

“Representation Letter” shall mean the Representation Letter pursuant to which the sender agrees to comply with DTC’s Operational Arrangements.

(b) The Bonds shall be initially issued as separately authenticated fully registered bonds, and one Bond shall be issued in the principal amount of each stated maturity of the Bonds. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of such Bonds shall be registered in the bond register in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. The Registrar and the City may treat DTC (or its nominee) as the sole and exclusive owner of the Bonds registered in its name for the purposes of payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, selecting the Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, if any, giving any notice permitted or required to be given to registered owners of Bonds under this resolution, registering the transfer of Bonds, and for all other purposes whatsoever, and neither the Registrar nor the City shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Neither the Registrar nor the City shall have any responsibility or obligation to any Participant, any person claiming a beneficial ownership interest in the Bonds under or through DTC or any Participant, or any other person which is not shown on the bond register as being a registered owner of any Bonds, with respect to the accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or any Participant, with respect to the payment by DTC or any Participant of any amount with respect to the principal of or interest on the Bonds, with respect to any notice which is permitted or required to be given to owners of Bonds under this resolution, with respect to the selection by DTC or any Participant of any person to receive payment in the event of a partial redemption of the Bonds, or with

4851-3257-9924\2 respect to any consent given or other action taken by DTC as registered owner of the Bonds. So long as any Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on such Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to such Bond, only to Cede & Co. in accordance with DTC’s Operational Arrangements, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City’s obligations with respect to the principal of and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond for each separate stated maturity evidencing the obligation of the City to make payments of principal and interest. Upon delivery by DTC to the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the Bonds will be transferable to such new nominee in accordance with paragraph (e) hereof.

(c) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interest of the Beneficial Owners that they be able to obtain Bonds in the form of bond certificates, the City may notify DTC and the Registrar, whereupon DTC shall notify the Participants of the availability through DTC of Bonds in the form of certificates. In such event, the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with paragraph (e) hereof. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and the Registrar and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with paragraph (e) hereof.

(d) The execution and delivery of the Representation Letter to DTC by the Mayor or City Manager, if not previously filed with DTC, is hereby authorized and directed.

(e) In the event that any transfer or exchange of Bonds is permitted under paragraph (b) or (c) hereof, such transfer or exchange shall be accomplished upon receipt by the Registrar of the Bonds to be transferred or exchanged and appropriate instruments of transfer to the permitted transferee in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. In the event Bonds in the form of certificates are issued to owners other than Cede & Co., its successor as nominee for DTC as owner of all the Bonds, or another securities depository as owner of all the Bonds, the provisions of this resolution shall also apply to all matters relating thereto, including, without limitation, the printing of such Bonds in the form of bond certificates and the method of payment of principal of and interest on such Bonds in the form of bond certificates.

Section 3. Use of Proceeds. Upon payment for the Bonds by the Purchaser, the City Finance Director shall deposit and apply the proceeds of the Bonds as follows:

(a) $[______] shall be deposited with the paying agent for the Refunded Bonds for redemption thereof on the Redemption Date;

(b) $[______] shall be used to pay issuance expenses of the Bonds; and

4851-3257-9924\2 (c) $[______] shall be deposited in the Bond Fund created pursuant to Section 4.01 hereof.

Section 4. Security Provisions.

4.01. General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2017C, Bond Fund. The Bonds shall be payable from a separate General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2017C Bond Fund (the “Bond Fund”), which the City agrees to maintain until the Bonds have been paid in full. If the money in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on the Bonds, such amounts shall be paid from other moneys on hand in other funds of the City, which other funds shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys become available in the Bond Fund. The money on hand in the Bond Fund from time to time shall be used only to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Into the Bond Fund shall be paid: (a) ad valorem taxes levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.02 hereof; and (b) any other funds appropriated by the Council for the payment of the Bonds.

4.02. Ad Valorem Taxes. The full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City are irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same become respectively due. In order to produce aggregate amounts not less than five percent (5%) in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds, ad valorem taxes are hereby levied on all taxable property in the City, the taxes to be levied and collected in the following years and amounts:

Levy Years Collection Years Amount

SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE

This tax shall be irrevocably appropriated to the Bond Fund as long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid, provided that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the levies in the manner and to the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61.

4851-3257-9924\2 Section 5. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank or trust company qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder’s option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date.

Section 6. Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money, Arbitrage and Official Statement.

6.01. Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution in the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such additional information as is required, and to obtain a certificate that the Bonds have been duly entered upon the County Auditor’s bond register and the tax required by law has been levied.

6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds, as the same appear from the books and records in their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, affidavits and certificates, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the correctness of all statements contained therein.

6.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Regulations”) as are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. The facilities refinanced by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City and the City shall not enter into any

4851-3257-9924\2 lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or other agreement or contract with any nongovernmental person relating to the use of the facilities financed by the Bonds, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered “private activity bonds” or “private loan bonds” pursuant to Section 141 of the Code.

6.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations.

6.05. Arbitrage Rebate. The City acknowledges that the Bonds are subject to the rebate requirements of Section 148(f) of the Code. The City covenants and agrees to retain such records, make such determinations, file such reports and documents and pay such amounts at such times as are required under said Section 148(f) and applicable Regulations, unless the Bonds qualify for an exception from the rebate requirement pursuant to one of the spending exceptions set forth in Section 1.148-7 of the Regulations and no “gross proceeds” of the Bonds (other than amounts constituting a “bona fide debt service fund”) arise during or after the expenditure of the original proceeds thereof.

6.06. Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations. The City hereby determines that the portion of the Bonds that is equal to the outstanding principal amount of the Refunded Bonds, $9,480,000, is deemed designated as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” as provided in Section 265(b)(3)(D) of the Code, since:

(a) the Refunded Bonds, when issued, were designated by the City as qualified tax-exempt obligations under Section 265(b) of the Code;

(b) the aggregate face amount of the issue of which the Bonds are a part does not exceed $10,000,000;

(c) the weighted average maturity of the Bonds does not exceed the remaining weighted average maturity of the Refunded Bonds; and

(d) no Bond has a maturity date which is later than thirty (30) years after the date of issuance of any bonds refunded by the Refunded Bonds which were designated as qualified tax-exempt obligations.

6.07. Official Statement. The Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated November 9, 2017, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., is hereby approved. Ehlers & Associates, Inc., is hereby authorized on behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a Final Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2-12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and such

4851-3257-9924\2 supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement.

Section 7. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the Purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2-12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the Rule), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds. The City is the only obligated person in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this section, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this section, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this section constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this section, Owner or Bondowner means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any Beneficial Owner (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, Beneficial Owner means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (ii) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes.

(b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times:

(1) on or before twelve months after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the Disclosure Information):

(A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to

4851-3257-9924\2 accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and

(B) to the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type contained in the Official Statement under headings: “VALUATIONS—Current Property Valuations,” “DEBT—Direct Debt,” and “TAX RATES, LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS—Tax Levies and Collections” and “GENERAL INFORMATION—US Census Data-Population Trend” and “—Employment / Unemployment Data,” which information may be unaudited.

Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been filed with the SEC or have been made available to the public on the Internet Web site of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB). If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the MSRB. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) hereof), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this section is amended as permitted by this paragraph (b)(1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided.

(2) In a timely manner not in excess of ten business days after the occurrence of the event, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events (each a Material Fact):

(A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non-payment related defaults, if material; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701- TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax status of the security;

4851-3257-9924\2 (G) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material; (H) Bond calls, if material, and tender offers; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; (K) Rating changes; (L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the obligated person; (M) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; and (N) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material.

As used herein, for those events that must be reported if material, an event is “material” if it is an event as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, an event is also “material” if it is an event that would be deemed material for purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event.

For the purposes of the event identified in (L) hereinabove, the event is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for an obligated person in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person.

(3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions:

(A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (b)(1) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this section pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under subsection (d)(2); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this section pursuant to subsection (d);

4851-3257-9924\2 (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City.

(1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time, the information described in subsection (b).

(2) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time.

(d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation.

(1) The covenants of the City in this section shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this section shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this section will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof.

(2) This section (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) hereof) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this section as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule.

If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the

4851-3257-9924\2 reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder.

(3) This section is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule.

Section 8. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. The City Finance Director is hereby directed to advise U.S. Bank National Association, St. Paul, Minnesota, as paying agent for the Refunded Bonds, to call such bonds for redemption and prepayment on the Redemption Date, and to give thirty days mailed Notice of Redemption (in the form attached to this resolution), all in accordance with the provisions of the resolutions authorizing the issuance of such bonds.

4851-3257-9924\2 Upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:

and the following voted against the same:

whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.

4851-3257-9924\2 PROJECTED LEVIES

Levy Years Collection Years Amount

[to come]

4851-3257-9924\2 NOTICE OF REDEMPTION

$9,480,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2009A, Dated as of April 29, 2009 City of Edina, Minnesota

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT there have been called for redemption and prepayment on February 1, 2018, all outstanding Bonds of the above referenced issue maturing February 1 in the following years and having the interest rates and CUSIP numbers listed below:

Interest CUSIP Interest CUSIP Year Amount Rate Number* Year Amount Rate Number* 2019 $645,000 3.100% 280605 S31 2025 $790,000 4.000% 280605 S98 2020 665,000 3.300 280605 S49 2026 825,000 4.125 280605 T22 2021 685,000 3.450 280605 S56 2027 860,000 4.250 280605 T30 2022 710,000 3.600 280605 S64 2028 895,000 4.300 280605 T48 2023 735,000 3.750 280605 S72 2029 935,000 4.350 280605 T55 2024 760,000 3.900 280605 S80 2030 975,000 4.400 280605 T63

*The Registrar shall not be responsible for the selection or use of the CUSIP numbers, nor is any representation made as to their correctness indicated in this Notice of Redemption or on any Bond. They are included solely for convenience of the Holders. Denotes full call of CUSIP.

The Bonds will be redeemed at a price of 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. Holders of the Bonds should present them for payment to U.S. Bank National Association, St. Paul, Minnesota, on or before said date, when they will cease to bear interest, in the following manner:

If by Mail: If by Hand or Overnight Mail:

U.S. Bank National Association U.S. Bank National Association Corporate Trust Services Corporate Trust Services P.O. Box 64111 111 Fillmore Avenue East St. Paul, MN 55164-0111 St. Paul, MN 55107

Important Notice: In compliance with the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, federal backup withholding tax will be withheld at the applicable backup withholding rate in effect at the time the payment by the redeeming institutions if they are not provided with your social security number or federal employer identification number, properly certified. This requirement is fulfilled by submitting a W-9 Form, which may be obtained at a bank or other financial institution.

The Registrar shall not be responsible for the selection of or use of the CUSIP number, nor is any representation made as to its correctness indicated in this Notice of Redemption. It is included solely for the convenience of the Holders.

4851-3257-9924\2 Additional information may be obtained from the undersigned or from Ehlers & Associates, Inc., 3060 Centre Pointe Dr, Roseville, MN 55113 (800.552.1171) .

Dated: ______, 20__.

BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL, EDINA, MINNESOTA

By ______Debra Mangen, City Clerk

4851-3257-9924\2 COUNTY AUDITOR’S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION AND TAX LEVY

The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin

County, Minnesota, hereby certifies that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on November 21, 2017, by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, setting forth the form and details of an issue of $9,480,000 General Obligation Capital Improvement

Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2017C, dated as of December 14, 2017.

I further certify that said Bonds have been entered on my bond register and the tax required by law for payment of the Bonds has been levied and filed, as required by Minnesota

Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63.

WITNESS my hand and official seal this ______day of ______, 2017.

______County Auditor

(SEAL)

4851-3257-9924\2 EXHIBIT A

BOND FORM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA

HENNEPIN COUNTY GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2017C

R- $

Interest Rate Maturity Date Date of Original Issue CUSIP No.

__% February 1, 20__ December 14, 2017

REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO.

PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: ______DOLLARS

THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (the “City”), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2018 (each such date, an “Interest Payment Date”), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360- day year composed of twelve 30-day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the “Registrar”), or its designated successor under the resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged.

This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $9,480,000, all of like date and tenor, except as to serial number, maturity date, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on November 21, 2017 (the “Resolution”), to refinance certain outstanding obligations of the City, and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of

4851-3257-9924\2 Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities.

The Bonds shall not be subject to optional redemption prior to their stated maturities, except that Bonds maturing in the year 2027 and thereafter shall be subject to call for prior redemption at the option of the City, in whole or in part, in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds having the same maturity date, on February 1, 2026, and any date thereafter, at the price of par plus accrued interest as of the date of redemption.

[COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS IF THERE ARE TERM BONDS]

Term Bonds Maturing in 20__ Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amount

The remaining $______stated principal amount shall be paid at maturity on February 1, 20__.

Term Bonds Maturing in 20__ Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amount

The remaining $______stated principal amount shall be paid at maturity on February 1, 20__.]

At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be published as required by law and mailed by first-class mail to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the bond register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price herein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon the partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding.

4851-3257-9924\2 As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner’s attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange.

The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City.

The Bonds have been designated by the City as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” pursuant to Section 265(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof, the City Council has by the resolutions approving the issuance of the Bonds covenanted and agreed to levy ad valorem taxes on all taxable property within the City; that such ad valorem taxes are estimated to be collectible for the years and in amounts sufficient to produce sums not less than five percent in excess of the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due, and that the City has appropriated such ad valorem taxes to the payment of such principal and interest; that if necessary for payment of such principal and interest, further ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the City outstanding on the date hereof and on the date of its actual issuance and delivery, does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness.

This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution described herein until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives.

4851-3257-9924\2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below.

4851-3257-9924\2 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA

(Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION

This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within.

Date of Authentication: ______

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar

By Authorized Representative

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM -- as tenants in common UTMA …………. as Custodian for ………….. (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act....…….. (State) JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common

Additional abbreviations may also be used.

ASSIGNMENT

For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ______the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ______attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated:

4851-3257-9924\2 NOTICE: The assignor’s signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever.

Signature Guaranteed:

Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an “eligible guarantor institution” meeting the requirements of the Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in STAMP or such other “signature guaranty program” as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: ______

[End of Bond Form.]

4851-3257-9924\2 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $1,640,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2017D

Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota

Governing Body: City Council

Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on November 21, 2017 at 7:00 o’clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota.

Members present:

Members absent:

Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): Pages 1 through 19

RESOLUTION NO. 2017-___

RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $1,640,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2017D

WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this ______day of November, 2017.

Debra Mangen, City Clerk

Councilmember ______introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, which motion was seconded by Member ______:

RESOLUTION NO. 2017-______

RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $1,640,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2017D

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the “City”), as follows:

Section 1. Authorization and Sale.

1.01. Authorization of Bonds. The City has presently outstanding its General Obligation Recreational Facilities Bonds, Series 2009C, initially dated as of December 10, 2009 (the “Series 2009C Bonds”), its Taxable General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012B, initially dated as of October 10, 2012 (the “Series 2012B Bonds”), its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012C (the “Series 2012C Bonds”), initially dated as of October 10, 2012 (the “Series 2012C Bonds”), its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013B, initially dated as of October 10, 2013 (the “Series 2013B Bonds”), its General Obligation Bonds, Series 2015B, initially dated as of July 15, 2015 (the “Series 2015B Bonds”), and its General Obligation Recreational Revenue Bonds, Series 2017B, initially dated as of June 29, 2017 (the “Series 2017B Bonds”), issued pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655 (the “Act”), and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Series 2009C Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds, the Series 2012C Bonds, the Series 2013B Bonds, the Series 2015B Bonds, and the Series 2017B Bonds are payable primarily out of the net revenues to be derived from the municipal golf courses, ice arena, swimming pool and liquor stores of the City (the “Net Revenues”). This Council authorizes the issuance and sale of its General Obligation Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2017D in the principal amount of $1,640,000 (the “Bonds”), the proceeds of which will be used, together with any additional funds of the City which might be required, to refund in advance of maturity, on February 1, 2018 (the Redemption Date) the 2019 through 2030 maturities of the Series 2009C Bonds. The Bonds are payable primarily out of the Net Revenues.

1.02. Findings. It is hereby found, determined and declared that the Net Revenues in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 ($1,888,096) exceed the maximum amount of principal and interest to become due in any future fiscal year ($[______]) on the Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds, the Series 2012C Bonds, the Series 2013B Bonds, the Series 2015B Bonds, and the Series 2017B Bonds (the “Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds”).

1.03. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., as independent municipal advisor in connection with the sale of the Bonds. Pursuant to a resolution adopted November 8, 2017 and a solicitation therefor, the sale of the Bonds has been awarded to

[______] (the “Purchaser”) at a price equal to the principal amount thereof upon the terms and conditions described herein.

1.04. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith.

Section 2. Bond Terms; Registration; Execution and Delivery.

2.01. Maturities; Interest Rates; Denominations; Payment. The Bonds shall be designated General Obligation Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2017D, shall be in the original principal amount of $1,640,000, shall be originally dated as of December 14, 2017, shall be in the denomination of $100,000 or any integral multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof, shall mature on [February 1, 2030] and shall bear interest at the rate of [____%], computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, from December 14, 2017 until paid or duly called for redemption.

2.02. Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2018, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day.

(a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged.

(b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any

-2- transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date.

(d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City.

(h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment.

-3-

(i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended.

2.04. Appointment of Registrar and Paying Agent. The City Finance Director is hereby appointed as the initial Registrar. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days’ notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar.

2.05. Redemption. The Bonds shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and by lot in the case of partial redemption, on any date (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof and accrued interest to the date of redemption. Prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond prior to its stated maturity date, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for redemption thereof to be published if and as required by law and, not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the call to be mailed to the registered holders of any Bonds to be redeemed at their addresses as they appear on the bond register described in Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price and amount of Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest.

The Bonds are subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium, on February 1 and August 1 in each of the years shown below, in an amount equal to the following principal amounts:

Date Amount Date Amount

August 1, 2018 $57,000 August 1, 2024 $69,000 February 1, 2019 61,000 February 1, 2025 69,000 August 1, 2019 62,000 August 1, 2025 70,000 February 1, 2020 63,000 February 1, 2026 71,000 August 1, 2020 63,000 August 1, 2026 72,000 -4- February 1, 2021 64,000 February 1, 2027 72,000 August 1, 2021 65,000 August 1, 2027 73,000 February 1, 2022 65,000 February 1, 2028 74,000 August 1, 2022 66,000 August 1, 2028 74,000 February 1, 2023 67,000 February 1, 2029 75,000 August 1, 202 3 67,000 August 1, 2029 76,000 February 1, 2024 68,000 February 1, 2030 77,000

The Bonds or portions thereof subject to mandatory redemption shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. No presentment of the Bonds to the Registrar shall be required in the case of mandatory sinking fund redemption.

2.06. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price.

2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed or printed in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A hereto.

Section 3. Use Of Proceeds. Upon payment for the Bonds by the Purchaser, the City Finance Director shall deposit proceeds of the Bonds in the sinking fund established for the Series 2009C Bonds to be applied to their payment on the Redemption Date.

Section 4. Bond Fund.

4.01. 2017D Recreational Facility Bond Fund. The Bonds shall be payable from a separate General Obligation Recreational Facilities Bonds, Series 2017D Bond Fund (the “Bond Fund”), which the City agrees to maintain until the Bonds have been paid in full. If the moneys in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on the Bonds, such amounts shall be paid from other moneys on hand in other funds of the City, which

-5- other funds shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys become available in the Bond Fund. There shall be credited to the Bond Fund the following:

(a) All collections of any taxes levied for the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, and all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, including the Net Revenues pledged and appropriated to the Bond Fund.

(b) The sum of $[______] [from Net Revenues] [transferred from the Bond Fund for the Series 2009C Bonds], which amount shall be credited to a separate subaccount in the Bond Fund as a reserve for the Bonds, which amount is equal to the average annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the Bonds and is required to be deposited therein pursuant to the Act.

4.02. Pledge of Net Revenues. The Net Revenues are hereby irrevocably pledged and appropriated to the payment of the Bonds and interest thereon when due and the maintenance of the reserve account required by the Act. The pledge of the Net Revenues to the payment of the Bonds and maintenance of the reserve account is on a parity with the pledge of the Net Revenues to the payment of the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds. Nothing herein shall preclude the City from hereafter making further pledges and appropriations of the Net Revenues for payment of additional obligations of the City hereafter authorized if the Council determines before the authorization of such additional obligations that the estimated Net Revenues will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to the payment of the Bonds, the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds and additional obligations, for payment of the Bonds, the Outstanding Recreational Facilities Bonds and such additional obligations. Such further pledges and appropriations of Net Revenues may be made superior or subordinate to, or on a parity with, the pledge and appropriation herein made.

Section 5. Pledge of Taxing Powers. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such payments respectively become due, the full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. It is, however, presently estimated that the funds appropriated pursuant to Section 4 hereof will provide sums not less than 5% in excess of principal and interest on the Bonds when due, and therefore no tax levy is presently required.

Section 6. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this Resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an -6- amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank or trust company qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder’s option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date.

Section 7. County Auditor Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money, and Arbitrage.

7.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law.

7.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein.

7.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Regulations”) as are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. The facilities financed by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City and the City shall not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or other agreement or contract with any nongovernmental person relating to the use of the facilities financed by the Bonds, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered “private activity bonds” or “private loan bonds” pursuant to Section 141 of the Code.

7.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this Resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it -7- reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations.

7.05. Arbitrage Rebate. The City shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code.

7.06. Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations. The City hereby determines that the portion of the Bonds that is equal to the outstanding principal amount of the Refunded Bonds, $1,60,000, is deemed designated as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” as provided in Section 265(b)(3)(D) of the Code, since

(a) the Refunded Bonds, when issued, were designated by the City as qualified tax-exempt obligations under Section 265(b) of the Code;

(b) the aggregate face amount of the issue of which the Bonds are a part does not exceed $10,000,000;

(c) the weighted average maturity of the Bonds does not exceed the remaining weighted average maturity of the Refunded Bonds; and

(d) no Bond has a maturity date which is later than thirty (30) years after the date of issuance of any bonds refunded by the Refunded Bonds which were designated as qualified tax-exempt obligations.

Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. Upon request and when available, the City will provide to the Purchaser the audited financial statements of the City.

Section 9. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. The City Finance Director is hereby directed to advise U.S. Bank National Association, as paying agent for the Refunded Bonds, to call such bonds for redemption and prepayment on the Redemption Date, and to give thirty days mailed Notice of Redemption (in the form attached to this resolution), all in accordance with the provisions of the resolutions authorizing the issuance of such bonds

Adopted this 21st day of November, 2017.

Mayor

Attest: City Clerk

The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by

-8- Councilmember ______and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:

and the following voted against the same:

whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.

-9- EXHIBIT A

Form of Series 2017D Bond

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN

CITY OF EDINA

GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL REVENUE REFUNDING BOND, SERIES 2017D

R-1 $1,640,000

Interest Maturity Date of Rate Date Original Issue CUSIP

[____ ]% February 1, 2030 December 14, 2017 none

REGISTERED OWNER: [______]

PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: ONE MILLION SIX HUNDRED FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS

THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 2018 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date, all subject to prior redemption as described herein. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by the City Finance Director, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged.

This Bond is issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on November 21, 2017 (the “Resolution”), for the purpose of refunding the City’s General Obligation Recreational Facilities Bonds, Series 2009C, and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $100,000 or any integral multiple of $5,000 in excess thereof, of single maturities.

Bonds of this issue are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part by lot, on any date (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus interest accrued to the date of redemption.

A-1

The Bonds shall be subject to mandatory redemption prior to maturity by lot pursuant to the mandatory sinking fund requirements of the Resolution at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium. Notice of redemption shall be given as provided in the Resolution.

As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner’s attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange.

The Bonds have been designated by the City as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” pursuant to Section 265(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that, by the Resolution the City has pledged to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds the net revenues of the City’s golf courses, swimming pool, ice arena and liquor stores as shall be required to pay such principal and interest and on a parity with the pledge of such net revenues to the payment of other outstanding bonds of the City; that if necessary for payment of the principal and interest, ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager, and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the Date of Original Issue set forth above.

CITY OF EDINA

City Manager Mayor

A-2

______

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION

This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within.

Date of Authentication:

CITY FINANCE DIRECTOR, as Registrar

By Authorized Representative

______

A-3

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM --as tenants in common UTMA ………….…. as Custodian for ………….….. (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT --as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act ...... …….. (State) JT TEN --as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

______

ASSIGNMENT

FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ______the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints ______attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated: NOTICE: The assignor’s signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever.

Signature Guaranteed:

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE:

A-4

NOTICE OF REDEMPTION

[to come]

COUNTY AUDITOR’S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION

The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin

County, Minnesota, hereby certifies that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on November 21, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Edina,

Minnesota, setting forth the form and details of an issue of $1,640,000 General Obligation

Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2017D, dated as of December 14, 2017.

I further certify that said Bonds have been entered on my bond register, as required by

Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63.

WITNESS my hand and official seal this ______day of ______, 2017.

County Auditor

(SEAL)

U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

CREDIT OPINION City of Edina, MN 15 November 2017 New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Edina, MN's GO New Issue Refunding Bonds Summary Rating Rationale Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aaa rating to the City of Edina, MN's $9.5 million General Obligation CIP Refunding Bonds, Series 2017C. Moody's maintains the Aaa rating on the city's outstanding GOULT debt and the Aa1 and Aa2 ratings on the city's lease revenue debt. Following the current sales, Edina will have $62 million of GOULT debt, $1.6 million of lease revenue bonds issued for more essential purposes, and $17.8 million of lease revenue Contacts bonds issued for less essential purposes. Brandi Head +1.312.706.9976 VP-Senior Analyst The Aaa GO rating reflects the large and affluent tax base in the Twin Cities area and healthy [email protected] financial profile. The rating also considers the city's above average debt and pension burden Alexandra S. Parker +1.212.553.4889 compared with operations. MD-Public Finance [email protected] The Aa1 lease revenue rating additionally incorporates the risk of non-appropriation for lease David Levett +1.312.706.9990 payments; and the more essential purpose of the financed project, a public works facility. AVP-Analyst [email protected] The Aa2 lease revenue rating additionally the risk of non-appropriation for lease payments; and the less essential purpose of the financed projects, a recreational facilities. CLIENT SERVICES Credit Strengths Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 » Large and affluent tax base located in the Twin Cities metropolitan area Japan 81-3-5408-4100 » Healthy operating reserves and liquidity EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 Credit Challenges » Above average debt and pension burdens relative to operations

Rating Outlook Outlooks are generally not applicable for local government credits with this amount of debt. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade » Not Applicable

Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade » Narrowing of operating reserves and liquidity

» Growth in the city's debt or pension burden MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

Key Indicators

Exhibit 1

Edina (City of) MN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Economy/Tax Base Total Full Value ($000) $ 9,360,281 $ 9,322,091 $ 9,922,330 $ 10,890,198 $ 11,272,241 Full Value Per Capita $ 194,378 $ 191,915 $ 202,745 $ 220,570 $ 222,043 Median Family Income (% of US Median) 185.5% 190.4% 198.7% 197.2% 197.2% Finances Operating Revenue ($000) $ 39,514 $ 40,146 $ 42,105 $ 41,742 $ 46,505 Fund Balance as a % of Revenues 53.5% 50.4% 48.0% 49.1% 50.3% Cash Balance as a % of Revenues 61.4% 55.1% 69.7% 53.5% 65.4% Debt/Pensions Net Direct Debt ($000) $ 61,719 $ 61,972 $ 78,921 $ 80,540 $ 78,133 Net Direct Debt / Operating Revenues (x) 1.6x 1.5x 1.9x 1.9x 1.7x Net Direct Debt / Full Value (%) 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Revenues (x) 1.9x 2.0x 2.2x 2.1x 2.2x Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Full Value (%) 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.8% 0.9%

Source: Audited Financial Statements, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., U.S. Census Bureau

Detailed Rating Considerations Economy and Tax Base: Affluent and mature Twin Cities suburb We expect Edina's tax base will maintain long-term stability due to its high resident income levels, favorable location and continued development. The city is a wealthy inner-ring Twin Cities suburb located in Hennepin County (Aaa stable) bordering western Minneapolis (Aa1 negative). Edina's substantial $11.7 billion tax base, as measured by economic market value, grew by 4.1% in 2017 and 3.5% in 2016 due to continued residential and commercial development. As of March 2017, the city's unemployment rate of 2.9% was lower than both state (4.4%) and national (4.6%) levels for the same time period. The city's resident income levels are high, with median family income estimated at 197% of the US. Full value per capita is very strong at $222,000.

Financial Operations and Reserves: Strong financial position; Strong liquor fund performance mitigates poor performance of other non-essential enterprises We anticipate that the city's financial operations will remain stable. The city's General Fund closed fiscal 2016 with an available (unassigned plus committed plus assigned) balance of $16.2 million, or a healthy 40.9% of General Fund revenues. The city's General Fund surplus of $2.9 million would have been larger but for a $805,000 transfer to the Construction Fund in fiscal 2016. The city historically transfers prior year surplus revenues to the Construction Fund to finance capital investments on a pay-go basis. The Construction Fund held $13.7 million in reserves at the end of 2016. Across the city's major operating funds (General and Debt Service), the city closed fiscal 2016 with an available balance of $23.4 million, or a healthy 50.3% of operating revenues. The City’s fiscal 2017 budget is balanced and management reports an expectation for a $1 million to $1.5 million operating surplus primarily due to favorable license and permit revenues, as well as expenditures tracking to budget.

The city's primary revenue source is property taxes, which comprised 64% of fiscal 2016 operating fund revenues. The second largest revenue sources are charges for services and licenses and permits (combined 21%) of revenues. Notably, these revenues have been increasing since 2009 due to continued development activity.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history.

2 15 November 2017 City of Edina, MN: New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Edina, MN's GO Refunding Bonds MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

The city's Municipal Liquor Fund provides modest support to a city-owned golf course and ice arena. Transfers to the two enterprises combined were $350,000 and $485,000 million in fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively. The liquor fund had a surplus of over $100,000 after transfers and held a cash balance of $1.2 million in fiscal 2016. The combined golf course and arena expenditures are small compared with governmental activities at approximately 12% of the city's operating fund revenues.

LIQUIDITY The city closed fiscal 2016 with a cash and investment balance of $30 million, or 65% of operating fund revenues. Cash and investments across all governmental funds totaled $53 million in fiscal 2016.

Debt and Pensions: Above average debt and pension obligations compared with operations The city's debt and pensions burden above average. Following the current sale, the city's net direct debt will total $93 million, which is above average compared with operations at 2.0 times operating revenues though more moderate compared with the tax base at 0.8% of full value. Approximately half of the city's outstanding GO debt is expected to be repaid with special assessments. Officials report special assessments are levied on occupied existing properties and that collection rates are high. The city plans to issue approximately $10 million of debt in 2018 for a new water treatment plant and $5 million for road reconstruction. In 2019, the city anticipates the need for $10 million additional debt for continued road and utility improvements.

The city’s three year average Moody's Adjusted Net pension Liability (ANPL) totals $103 million, equal to 0.9% of full value and 2.2 times fiscal 2016 operating revenue. The city’s reported net pension liability, based on an 7.5% discount rate, was $53.4 million. While relatively consistent in recent years, pension costs will likely grow because statutory contribution levels have not kept pace with growing unfunded liabilities in state-wide pension plans. The city’s total fixed costs, inclusive of debt service and retirement contributions, were 22% of fiscal 2016 operating fund revenues.

DEBT STRUCTURE All of the city's debt is fixed rate and 79% of post-sale principal is scheduled to be retired within ten years.

DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES The city is not a party to any derivative agreements.

PENSIONS AND OPEB The city participates in two multiple-employer cost-sharing plans, the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF). While ultimately dependent on state legislative action, pension contributions will likely rise due to growing unfunded liabilities. Growing pension costs could pressure Minnesota cities’ operating budgets.

Minnesota statutes establish local government retirement contributions as a share of annual payroll. The employer contribution rates are currently set at 7.5% of payroll for GERF and at 16.2% of payroll for PEPFF. The city’s total fiscal 2016 pension contribution was $2.5 million, or 6.0% of operating revenues.

In fiscal 2016, contributions to PEPFF from all participating governments in aggregate amounted to only 87% of the plan’s “tread water” indictor. Employer contributions that tread water equal the sum of current year service cost and interest on reported net pension liabilities at the start of the year. If plan assumptions are met exactly, contributions equal to the tread water indicator will prevent the reported net pension liabilities from growing.

Other post-employment benefits (OPEB) obligations do not represent a material credit risk for the city. The city does not offer explicit OPEB benefits, but allows retired employees to stay on its health care plan, creating an implicit rate subsidy. The city’s most recent unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) was $2.5 million.

Management and Governance: Strong institutional framework reflects capacity to adjust revenue and expenditures Minnesota cities have an Institutional Framework score of Aa, which is high. Institutional Framework scores measure a sector's legal ability to increase revenues and decrease expenditures. The sector has one or more major revenue sources that are not subject to any caps. Revenues tend to be predictable, as cities rely primarily on property taxes and state Local Government Aid (LGA), which is distributed based on demographic and tax base factors. Revenue-raising flexibility is moderate as cities generally benefit from unlimited levying authority, except during years in which the state has imposed limits. Levy limits are not in place for the 2016-2017 biennium.

3 15 November 2017 City of Edina, MN: New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Edina, MN's GO Refunding Bonds MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

Across the sector, fixed and mandated costs are generally moderate. Minnesota has public sector unions, which can limit the ability to cut expenditures. Expenditures mostly consist of personnel costs, which are highly predictable.

The city's formal fund balance policy is to maintain 42% to 47% of the next year's tax revenues in unassigned fund balance, while transferring any surplus out of operating funds for purposes designated by the City Council. In fiscal 2016, the city reported an unassigned General Fund balance of $14.6 million. Legal Security The city's Series 2017C Refunding bond, is secured by the city's pledge to levy a tax unlimited as to rate or amount to pay debt service. Use of Proceeds The Series 2017C bond proceeds will be used to refund General Obligation Capital Improvement bonds, Series 2009A. Obligor Profile Edina encompasses an area of approximately 16.5 square miles in Hennepin County and is a southwestern suburb in the Minneapolis (Aa1 negative) metropolitan area. The city's 2010 U.S. census population was 47,941, while population is currently estimated at 49,373. Methodology The principal methodology used in this rating was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in December 2016. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. Ratings

Exhibit 3 Edina (City of) MN Issue Rating General Obligation CIP Refunding Bonds, Series Aaa 2017C Rating Type Underlying LT Sale Amount $9,480,000 Expected Sale Date 11/21/2017 Rating Description General Obligation Source: Moody's Investors Service

4 15 November 2017 City of Edina, MN: New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Edina, MN's GO Refunding Bonds MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

© 2017 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.” Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

REPORT NUMBER 1099992

5 15 November 2017 City of Edina, MN: New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Edina, MN's GO Refunding Bonds MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

CLIENT SERVICES

Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454

6 15 November 2017 City of Edina, MN: New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aaa to Edina, MN's GO Refunding Bonds Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation

Primary Credit Analyst: Cora Bruemmer, Chicago (312) 233-7099; [email protected]

Secondary Contact: Scott Nees, Chicago (1) 312-233-7064; [email protected]

Table Of Contents

Rationale

Outlook

Related Research

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 15, 2017 1 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation

Credit Profile

US$9.48 mil GO CIP rfdg bnds ser 2017C due 02/01/2029 Long Term Rating AAA/Stable New Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed

Rationale

S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'AAA' long-term rating to Edina, Minn.'s series 2017C general obligation (GO) capital improvement plan (CIP) refunding bonds. At the same time, we affirmed our 'AAA' long-term rating on the city's existing GO debt and our 'AA+' long-term rating on its existing lease-revenue debt issued by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The outlook on all ratings is stable.

The city's unlimited-tax, full faith and credit GO pledge secures the series 2017C bonds. Proceeds of the 2017C bonds will provide for a current refunding of the city's series 2009A bonds for interest cost savings.

Some of the city's outstanding GO debt is additionally secured by various revenue sources, but all existing GO debt is rated to the GO pledge. The 'AA+' appropriation rating is based on the city's pledge to annually appropriate the necessary lease payments to make annual debt service; accordingly, the lease bonds are rated one notch below the GO bonds.

The city's GO bonds are eligible to be rated above the sovereign because we believe the city can maintain better credit characteristics than the U.S. in a stress scenario. Under our criteria, titled "Ratings Above The Sovereign—Corporate And Government Ratings: Methodology And Assumptions" (published Nov. 19, 2013, on RatingsDirect), U.S. local governments are considered to have moderate sensitivity to country risk. The institutional framework in the U.S. is predictable for local governments, allowing them significant autonomy, independent treasury management, with no history of federal government intervention, and we believe Edina's financial flexibility is sufficiently demonstrated by its very strong budgetary reserves and liquidity.

The ratings reflect our assessment of the following factors for Edina, specifically its:

• Very strong economy, with access to a broad and diverse metropolitan statistical area (MSA); • Very strong management, with "strong" financial policies and practices under our Financial Management Assessment (FMA) methodology; • Strong budgetary performance, with operating surpluses in the general fund and at the total governmental fund level in fiscal 2016; • Very strong budgetary flexibility, with an available fund balance in fiscal 2016 of 85% of operating expenditures;

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 15, 2017 2 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation

• Very strong liquidity, with total government available cash at 129.8% of total governmental fund expenditures and 9.5x governmental debt service, and access to external liquidity we consider strong; • Weak debt and contingent liability position, with debt service carrying charges at 13.7% of expenditures and net direct debt that is 191.7% of total governmental fund revenue, but rapid amortization, with 78.7% of debt scheduled to be retired in 10 years; and • Strong institutional framework score.

Very strong economy We consider Edina's economy very strong. The city, with an estimated population of 50,766, is in Hennepin County in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington MSA, which we consider to be broad and diverse. It has a projected per capita effective buying income of 191% of the national level and per capita market value of $231,093. Overall, market value grew by 4.1% over the past year to $11.7 billion in 2016/17. The county unemployment rate was 3.4% in 2016.

Edina remains one of the Twin Cities' premiere, wealthy, inner-ring suburbs. Despite being fully built-out, the city has seen substantial growth over the last five years, as residents and business owners tear down and replace older homes and buildings with new construction. In addition, luxury residential buildings are being added in already-developed areas, especially around the Southdale shopping area. Over 1,700 apartment units have been added since 2012, and 600 more have been approved for development. All of this new development has resulted in nearly a 25% increase in the city's net tax capacity over the last five years. We expect the growth to continue, and therefore believe that the city's economy will remain very strong.

Very strong management We view the city's management as very strong, with "strong" financial policies and practices under our FMA methodology, indicating financial practices are strong, well embedded, and likely sustainable.

The city council adopts a detailed two-year budget and maintains a five-year CIP that identifies sources and uses of funds. The council reviews budget-to-actual results during quarterly workshops. Edina meets its policy to maintain an unassigned general fund balance at 42% to 47% of the subsequent year's budgeted tax revenue. When the unassigned fund balance falls below or exceeds this range, the city council then either creates a plan to restore fund balance or considers transferring the excess to other funds. In the past several years, the council has made transfers to the construction fund. Edina has its own investment policy and formally reports on investment holdings and earnings to the council annually. It also has its own debt management policy.

Strong budgetary performance Edina's budgetary performance is strong, in our opinion. The city had operating surpluses of 6.9% of expenditures in the general fund and 7.2% across all governmental funds in fiscal 2016. Our assessment accounts for the fact that we expect budgetary results could deteriorate somewhat from 2016 results in the near term.

We have adjusted 2016 figures to exclude a discretionary transfer of the prior-year surplus from the general fund to the construction fund, in line with the city's fund balance policy. We adjusted total governmental fund revenue to include recurring transfers from its enterprise funds. We also adjusted 2016 total governmental fund expenditures to exclude one-time grant revenue and one-time capital spending funded from bond proceeds or cash on hand.

The 2016 budget called for balanced operations, but the year closed $2.8 million better than budget due to strong

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 15, 2017 3 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation performance in license and permit revenue, as well as lower expenditures. The 2017 budget also calls for balanced operations. Officials are currently projecting a $1 million to $1.5 million operating surplus, again largely due to strong license and permit revenue. The preliminary fiscal 2018 budget, which will be officially adopted in December, also calls for balanced operations. We believe that stable-to-growing revenues, along with well-managed expenditures, will allow the city to continue its trend of operating surpluses. Similarly, the city has demonstrated strong performance across total governmental funds, after adjustments for one-time expenditures, which we expect to continue.

The city's golf course, arena, and nonmajor enterprise funds' performance has been somewhat weaker. These funds rely on partial support from the city's liquor enterprise fund. Officials have a long-term plan to improve golf course operations. It has closed one course and is reconstructing the existing 27-hole course into an 18-hole championship course that will elevate the quality of its golf operations. The operating deficits in these funds have been relatively small so we do not expect them to pressure the city's general operations. Furthermore, strong operations in the city's liquor enterprise provides additional cushion.

The city has a locally derived revenue base: Over two-thirds of its total governmental fund revenue is from local taxes (including property taxes, tax-increment and special assessments, and franchise taxes). We believe property taxes are a stable revenue source for Edina, and the city is insulated from fluctuations in state or federal revenue.

Very strong budgetary flexibility Edina's budgetary flexibility is very strong, in our view, with an available fund balance in fiscal 2016 of 83% of operating expenditures, or $30.0 million. We expect the available fund balance to remain above 30% of expenditures for the current and next fiscal years, which we view as a positive credit factor. The available fund balance includes $16.2 million (45% of expenditures) in the general fund and $13.7 million (38%) that is outside the general fund but legally available for operations.

The amount of available fund balance outside the general fund consists of the liquor fund's unrestricted balance ($630,000) and the assigned portion of the construction fund balance ($13.1 million), which the general fund contributes to each year through transfers. The construction fund portion has been growing each year, and while it is assigned for capital purposes (equipment, vehicles, etc.), it could be reassigned for general operations at any time without restrictions.

Officials are currently projecting a $1 million to $1.5 million operating surplus in 2017; however, per the city's fund balance policy, the city will likely transfer approximately $2 million from the general fund to the construction fund, reducing the available general fund balance somewhat. We expect general fund reserves to remain in compliance with the city's policy to maintain 42%-47% of the subsequent year's budgeted tax revenue, and so we expect budgetary flexibility will remain very strong.

Very strong liquidity In our opinion, Edina's liquidity is very strong, with total government available cash at 129.8% of total governmental fund expenditures and 9.5x governmental debt service in 2016. In our view, the city has strong access to external liquidity if necessary.

The city has issued bonds frequently during the past 15 years and maintains a strong credit profile, so we believe it

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 15, 2017 4 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation would have strong market access if needed for external liquidity. The city's investments are primarily in federal bonds, certificates of deposit, and the Minnesota Municipal Money Market fund, none of which we view as aggressive. Edina has no direct-purchase or variable-rate debt. We expect its liquidity profile to remain very strong.

Weak debt and contingent liability profile In our view, Edina's debt and contingent liability profile is weak. Total governmental fund debt service is 13.7% of total governmental fund expenditures, and net direct debt is 191.7% of total governmental fund revenue. Approximately 78.7% of the direct debt is scheduled to be repaid within 10 years, which is, in our view, a positive credit factor.

The city plans to issue approximately $25 million of GO debt over the next two years for street and utility improvements, which we do not believe will materially affect its debt profile.

Edina's combined required pension and actual other postemployment benefit (OPEB) contributions totaled 4.7% of total governmental fund expenditures in 2016. The city made its full annual required pension contribution in 2016. It participates in cost-sharing multiemployer defined-benefit pension plans administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA administers the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF). The city's annual required pension contribution to both GERF and PEPFF is determined by state statute and based on a percentage of payroll. Contributions are not based on an actuarial determined contribution, and have not been keeping up with the plan's increasing liabilities, which indicates that employer contributions may rise in the future.

Using updated reporting standards in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standard Board (GASB) Statement Nos. 67 and 68, the city's net pension liability as of 2016 was $53.4 million. The funded ratios of the plans, which are calculated as the plan fiduciary net position as a percent of the total pension liability, were 68.9% for GERF and 63.9% for PEPFF in fiscal 2016.

The city is legally required to include any retirees in the same insurance pool as its active employees, but the premiums are paid by the retiree, resulting in an implicit rate subsidy. The city funds its OPEBs on a pay-as-you-go basis. As of Jan. 1, 2016, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the city's unfunded actuarial accrued liability was $2.5 million.

Strong institutional framework The institutional framework score for Minnesota cities with a population greater than 2,500 is strong.

Outlook

The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Edina will maintain its strong budgetary performance and very strong budgetary flexibility and liquidity, supported by very strong management and a robust tax base. Given these very strong credit quality characteristics, including access to the Minneapolis-St. Paul MSA, we do not anticipate changing the rating within the two-year outlook horizon.

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 15, 2017 5 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation

Downside scenario Significant financial deterioration could result in a lower rating, but we do not expect that to occur.

Related Research

• S&P Public Finance Local GO Criteria: How We Adjust Data For Analytic Consistency, Sept. 12, 2013 • Incorporating GASB 67 And 68: Evaluating Pension/OPEB Obligations Under Standard & Poor's U.S. Local Government GO Criteria, Sept. 2, 2015

Ratings Detail (As Of November 15, 2017)

Edina GO recreational rev bnds ser 2017B dtd 06/29/2017 due 02/01/2033 Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina Hsg & Redev Auth, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota Edina Hsg & Redev Auth (Edina) Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Edina Hsg & Redev Auth (Edina) APPROP Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Edina Hsg & Redev Auth (Edina) APPROP Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 15, 2017 6 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation

Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on the S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column.

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

STANDARD & POOR’S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT NOVEMBER 15, 2017 8 2017C – Current Refunding of 2009A

• $1,440,157 total debt service reduction

1 2017D – Current Refunding of 2009C

• $235,874 total debt service reduction

2 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: VII.E.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Resolution No. 2017-131: Approving Grants and Action Subject: Donations

ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt Resolution.

INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration.

ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Resolution No. 2017-131 Donations

RESOLUTION NO. 2017-131 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA

WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens;

WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens.

Parks & Recreation Administration Crime Prevention Fund $6,000.00 Scholarship Grant Rotary Club of Edina $10,000.00 Interactive Musical Instruments Rosland Park

Dated: November 21, 2017

Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor

STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK

I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______day of ______, ______.

City Clerk CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: VII.F.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From: Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Resolution No. 2017-132: Establishing Extended Action Subject: Parking Hours

ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution 2017-132.

INTRODUCTION: This item pertains to temporary changes to on-street parking restrictions. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Staff memo - Res 2017-132 ten hour parking Resolution No. 2017-132 Ten Hour Parking

Economic Development / HRA Phone 952-826-0407 • Fax 952-826-0390 • www.EdinaMN.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council

From: Bill Neuendorf , Economic Development Manager

Resolution 2017 -132: Establishing Extended Parking Hours on Designated Re: Streets

As the City prepares for the expansion of the North Parking Ramp located at 3930-3944 Market Street, several temporary adjustments will be needed to accommodate the needs of customers, businesses and residents.

• The North Ramp will be removed from service from approximately January 1 to April 1, 2018. It will be partially available beginning in April 2018 and will be fully completed in September 2018.

• The Center Ramp and adjacent surface parking lot will be gradually removed from service as early as April 1, 2018 and will re-open in September 2019.

The November 8, 2017 staff memo identified 12 strategies to meet this challenge. There is no singular solution that will nullify the impacts of a major construction project. All parties will have to endure small changes and be flexible to allow the construction to be completed. This Resolution implements one of the many strategies. Other strategies have already been implemented (parking permits and contractor parking) and are in the process for implementation soon (France Avenue parking, valet parking, etc).

Temporary Extension of On-Street Parking Limits

The City Code currently places a 6-hour time limit for any vehicle to be parked on City streets. This typical restriction is superseded in locations where no parking is allowed (fire hydrants, driveways, etc.) or where more strict time limits apply (in front of businesses, for example).

Most communities that border Edina allow on-street parking for up to 24-hours. These communities include: Hopkins, Bloomington, Eden Prairie and Saint Louis Park. Minneapolis has parking rules that vary significantly from neighborhood to neighborhood.

For the duration of the North Parking Ramp Expansion (January to October 2018), this 6-hour restriction is proposed to be increased to 10-hours for the areas within walking distance of 50 th and France. This will

City of Edina • 4801 W. 50 th St. • Edina, MN 55424

Extending Parking Hours on Designated Streets November 21, 2017 Page 2

allow employees and customers to park on the public streets to access the business district during times that the remaining ramps are full.

This area is bounded by France Avenue, 48 th Street, 54 th Street and Bruce Avenue. The specific streets are shown below.

This temporary change is proposed after input from the City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney and Police Department. This change does not impact other parking restrictions such as overnight parking during the winter months, parking in front of fire hydrants, blocking driveways or crosswalks, etc.

Signs will be posted and neighbors will be notified prior to the enactment of this temporary change. Staff recommends that Resolution 2017-132 be approved.

END

CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA

RESOLUTION NO. 2017-132

RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING EXTENDED PARKING HOURS ON DESIGNATED STREETS

WHEREAS , Section 26-41(b) of the City Code provides six hour time limits for parking on streets and highways unless otherwise designated on erected and installed signs; and

WHEREAS, the City desires to extend the hours of allowed parking because certain municipal parking facilities will be temporarily closed for reconstruction.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:

1. The time limit for parking on streets within the following area is ten hours Monday through Friday from January 1, 2018 to October 30, 2018: 48 th Street on the north, Bruce Avenue on the west, 54 th Street on the south, and France Avenue on the east.

2. This extension of time does not affect any other parking regulations.

3. Signs authorizing the extended parking hours shall be installed on all streets in the designated area.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21 st day of November, 2017 by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota.

CITY OF EDINA

BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor ATTEST:

Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk

195237v1

STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )

The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Edina City Council on November 21, 2017, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof.

WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this ______day of ______, 2017.

______CITY CLERK

195237v1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: VIII.A.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject: Correspondence Information

ACTION REQUESTED: None.

INTRODUCTION: Correspondence received since the last Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Correspondences Council Correspondence

Date / Time: 11/13/2017 10:45:00 AM

Name: Ken Potts

Address: 4236 Crocker Ave Edina , MN 55416

Email: [email protected]

Attachment:

Comments: Dear Mayor and Council Members,

I add to my comments from the November 8, 2017 City Council meeting by sharing the following information. Below this message (in the submission attachment) are the images I presented to you with additional supporting details.

Per my presentation, I suggest that a great deal of concern to resident-taxpayers is created when basic aspects of the City Code are not consistently enforced. This situation is exacerbated when lack of enforcement is called to the attention of staff, and still is not addressed.

At the September 19, 2017 City Council meeting, City Manager Neal stated, "I happen to think we are a leader in the country on how we handle residential redevelopment" [timestamp 3:59:00]. There clearly is a gap between this statement and the experiences of many resident-taxpayers. Two ways this can be seen (in addition to the examples below) is in the volume of correspondence to Council, and the impact it has on the length of Council meetings when residents are so significantly impacted that they are compelled to invest substantial time and their own resources to attend and comment.

Thank you, Ken Potts

November 13, 2017 Per the Contact Council instructions below, please include this information in the City Council meeting packet for the 11/21/17 City Council meeting. Thank you, Ken Potts

Contact Council

: and elect: ; •- •••

• if you Dear Mayor and Council Members,

Thank you, Ken Potts

00 ABOUT DEPARTMENTS GOV

City Council

The Mayor and Council are responsible for the efficient operation of the city government through policies and ordinances that are carried out by the Council- appointed City Manager.

Specifically, the Council is responsible for budgeting, taxation and management of City property. The Council is accountable to the residents of Edina. www.edinamn.gov

City Code ARTICLE XVII. - LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES The city council finds and declares that the lands of the city are a valuable resource requiring protection from the effects of urbanization. Why are neighbors concerned?

Edina City Code Sec. 24-21. — Prohibited encumbrances or obstructions. "...no person shall obstruct, encroach upon, encumber or interfere, wholly or partially, with any street... [or] easement...

25+ cubic yards of earth added to City Right of Way: • Work completed 11/14/16 • Permit Application 11/17/16 • Permit Approved 12/14/16 • Permit fee paid ...not yet

...and it remains there today • Excerpt from epermits website on 11/12/17 shows the permit

Permit ED152141 Detail X fee of $166.00 has not yet been

0 fib lcys_orD * paid.

City of Edina

Home Perlail3 Pecenit FeeEniataint Smreit Cart {0) Accomt Login

Permit ED152141 Details

thew: Schedule Inspechons

Property Information 2102324130122 Address: 7377 Glaucbester Dr

Permit Information Permit SD152141 . Permit Typc Public Worts Sub Type: Grading Work Type: Alteration Description:

Assigned Dates Applied Date: 11/1712016 Issued Date: 12/14/2016 Approved Date: 12/142016 Final Date- Cancel Date. Dead Date Refund Date. Expiration Date:

Permit Fees Total Fee, 0166.0/. Total Payments: 56.00 Outstanding Balance: 0145.00

Total Outstanding Balance: 6166.00 Balance Due Nom /16601

to pay outstanding fees fat Mu permit.

10:03 AM u a 0 Type here to search • 4E [0, e 9 til '6:11 11/12/2017 ..

Why are neighbors concerned?

Edina City Code Sec. 10-703. - Grading activities standards and guidelines. (f) When vegetation is removed during development, the exposed condition of land shall be kept to the shortest practical period of time, but not longer than 60 days. August 2016 City Manager: "It has not been the operating practice of the City, however, to enforce this provision of City Code for single family lots because it has not been practicable to do so."

Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP BMP violations

October 2017 Excerpts from 4/17/14 letter from City Manager Scott Neal to Ken Potts

City Response: The City acknowledges that the building contractor had exposed grading on the site for a time period in excess of 60 days, It has not been the operating practice of the City, however, to enforce this provision of City Code for single family lots because it has not b en practicable to do so. Because the City had lot nre..viously enforced this Code provision on single 1,3r home redeVelopment sites, the City's iegal counsel advised us not to enforce it on this site. Legal coo .Isel has prepared an amendment to City Code -for the City Council to consider that would address this Is - ue more direct:-y; It will be considered by the City Council at their May 20'Council meeting.

...highlighted text from this letter was presented at the 11/8/17 City Council meeting.

...per published minutes from May 20, and the following 3 meetings, this topic was not "considered by the City Council". In the interest of transparency and equity, please publish a list of all Codes where we should not expect enforcement. Excerpts from 9/19/17 City Council meeting

Member Fischer - "We have to do something to make this better for our residents...if we're pro-active, maybe it can help with a system where it doesn't feel quite that way." [timestamp 3:56:30]

ihecrry,„ City Manager Neal - "I happen to think we are a leader in the country on how we handle EDINA residential redevelopment" [timestamp 3:59:00]

City Manacer Scott Neal's Slog XI. Mayor & Council Comments Enforcement cd Neal June t3. 2012 d in Scot; Neal Sept. 19. 2017 City Manager Neal blog re: Passive Enforcement - 44 :59:00/ 4:27:4 "It really all depends of the character of the SCOTT NEAL City Council Meeting community and the will of the elected officials to know what their residents will tolerate..."

f t neCITYLItEDINA .1111•••.— — -

For lMnq, learning, rattang families & domq busman*

Slogs

" About the Author City Manager City Blogi Scott Neal's Blog Dry Manager , ' • • Blog has a so relo the positions of ty zkitriristratt: thE :c,r- rnties of `iosthfeld. r rt Pleasant. Iowa. i:r s. Tenn_ Neal *as ,1-‘2. Edina tne first City Managers 01. Liquor -res va aro :re :`:he • 411 -• - r .• • ' • • - _ • sits Blog

,f7 something abou: the thing that bugs yo ff is contrafy to C •;, Z 3 .-.7.Z..7,-rm.P.nt A" a Nog ar: has p-obably WY: if yOu dont EF:D. Pulse 4 :* t:: ze,risira stratitIf Aa:, Blog ' • -

Boon Neal — posted in jun* 18, 2012 Parks & Recrea4,

111 costs

of :fe issues a also chepenos on no eu- officials feet abotit tne reach aria boaec Of eCt-x Public government Works h all depends.. Blog Council Correspondence

Date / Time: 11/16/2017 11:26:00 AM

Name: Connie Carrino

Address: 4509 Garrison Lane Edina , Minnesota 55424

Email: [email protected]

Attachment:

Comments: November 16, 2017

TO: Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Mary Brindle, Mike Fischer, Kevin Staunton and Bob Stewart

FROM: Lake Nancy Lake Association Board

CC: Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator City of Edina

RE: Public Walking/Biking Path Between Lake Nancy and Otto Lake.

We're not certain how often this topic comes up at your dais, but sometimes duty call-or in this instance, "doody calls." Today we're asking for your help with dog poop. Specifically, the growing problem of the messy piles that owners leave behind on the public walking/biking path between Lake Nancy and Otto Lake.

As Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator for the City, along with the Master Water Stewards serving on the City's Energy and Environment Commission can attest, dog poop is a major detriment to water quality. When pet owners refuse to scoop-poop, the waste washes into our lakes, streams, ponds and stormwater systems adding extra nutrients to the water that encourages weed and algae growth, not to mention all kinds of bacteria, too.

In 2015 twenty shoreline property owners on Lake Nancy met to begin discussions about what we could do to help improve Lake Nancy. We formed a lake association in 2016 and we now meet at least annually to determine activities that will help maintain, protect and improve the water quality, aesthetic values, wildlife habitat and recreational capacity of Lake Nancy. We're willing to do our part, unfortunately the same isn't true for the thoughtless pet owners who refuse to do their part with their pet's do-do along the public walking/biking path. And that path is used by residents beyond our

immediate neighborhood-it is used by those throughout the city to access the pedestrian bridge across highway 62.

To help both with education and proper disposal of dog waste, we are requesting that the city install and maintain two dog waste containers (we have two locations in mind on or near the path) that also include a supply of plastic baggies and educational information about the pet waste problem. Because this is a heavily used public area, we think it provides a great opportunity for education not only on pet waste, leash laws, and water quality, but also tips on what residents can do to improve stormwater runoff.

If approved, we kindly request that city staff coordinate the educational message with the Edina Quality Working Group and work with our association on best placement of the pet waste receptacles. Ms. Wilson has our contact information, but if you have immediate questions you can contact our association secretary, Connie Carrino at 952.920.2111.

Best regards.

Page | 2

October 3, 2017

To Edina City Council and Mayor,

We are completely shocked at the $24,858.85 assessment to our property at 4709 Townes Road for the work done on Townes Road last fall. We would like to appeal that special assessment because in no way do we feel it is justified. We would like to know how you arrived at that figure, why it is different for other houses in the neighborhood, why you think you can justify it basis an increased value for our property, and finally how much did it really cost to, as you say, improve the road.

From our perspective the road is less desirable now than it was last year since it is now more narrow, which makes it that much more difficult to exit our driveway when cars are parked across the street from our house. In the winter this is especially a big negative and actually is a safety hazard since our driveway is relatively steep so sliding into a parked car is a definite possibility. (not so much for us but for guests not used to that turn)

Also, your crews did a very poor job returning our yard and sprinkler system to the state they were in before the project began. For the amount you charged I can't believe how poor the grass looks in our neighborhood since the median is mostly weeds now and not grass. Again for 24,000 dollars sod should have been laid as it was in other neighborhoods in the metro area where similar projects were done. I finally decided to pay the cost and lay down sod to reduce my irritation regarding how our yard looked. We also paid our sprinkler company to repair the damage done by your crews. I don't know whom you hired to do the repair because they never showed up at our house.

If it is true that special assessments must by law match the benefit or increase in property value created by the project then you have some real explaining to do because we are completely confident that the value of 4709 Townes Road increased only marginally if at all.

Sincerely,

ohn and Sallie March qsx -9a9-0-PA CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: B.1.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From: Jackie Hoogenakker, Planning Division Item Activity: Subject: Minutes: Planning Commission October 11, 2017 Information

ACTION REQUESTED:

None.

INTRODUCTION:

Attached please find a copy of the approved October 11, 2017, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes.

ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Minutes: Planning Commission, October 11, 2017 Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 10/25/2017

Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers October 11, 2017

I. Call To Order

Vice-Chair Nemerov called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M.

II. Roll Call

Answering the roll: Commissioners Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Hamilton, Bennett, Vice-Chair Nemerov. Student Member Mittal. Staff, Assistant Planner, Aaker Sr., Water Resources Coordinator, Wilson, Communications Coord., Eidsness, Support Staff, Hoogenakker.

Absent from the roll: Commissioners Hobbs, Olsen, Jones, Berube.

III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda

A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the October 11, 2017, meeting agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried.

IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes

A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the minutes of the September 27, 2017, Planning Commission Meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried.

V. Public Hearings

A. Variance. Refined LLC. 5712 Woodland Lane, Edina, MN

Staff Presentation

Planner Aaker reported that the applicant is requesting to increase the first floor elevation 7.1 feet higher than the current home’s first floor elevation in order to construct a new home at 5712 Woodland Lane. This property is located in the Minnehaha Woods neighborhood and a large portion of the property is located within the floodplain. The City of Edina’s Engineering standards require the basement elevation of the new home to be 2 feet higher than the FEMA base flood elevation. The

Page 1 of 6

Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 10/25/2017 requirement for increased height in basement elevation affects the ability for the project to conform to the maximum first floor height requirement of 1 foot.

The property is located at the end of Woodland Lane Cul-de-sac and backs up to Minnehaha Creek. The multi-level home was built in 1952 prior to the FEMA floodplain study conducted in 1979 to determine flood risk areas. The lowest level of the home is at 858.3, which is 3.9 feet lower than the minimum flood protection elevation of 862.2. This is a neighborhood prone to flooding with most of the homes built prior to the flood plain study and with many having low floors below the flood protection elevation. It is a City and Watershed District goal to elevate and remove homes out of the flood hazard areas when the opportunity presents itself.

Aaker explained that a variance is required to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The current home located at 5712 Woodland Lane has a first floor elevation of 865.6 feet above sea level. This neighborhood in Edina is located in a floodplain area, and the established floodplain elevation is 860.2. The minimum basement elevation must be no less than 2 feet above the flood elevation so the minimum basement elevation for the property is at 862.2 feet.

Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report above, and subject to the following conditions:

1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans:

• Survey date stamped September 11, 2017. • Building plans and elevations date stamped September 11, 2017.

2. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo dated.

Appearing for the Applicant

Andy Porter, Refined LLC

Comments/Questions

Planner Aaker was asked how tall the new house was. Planner Aaker responded that the house as proposed is 39-feet high, adding 40-feet is the maximum height allowed. The ridge height is at 901.

The discussion continued with some Commissioners questioning the overall building height of the house and how height is measured. Planner Aaker explained that height is measured from the existing grade. She pointed out that the house being torn down is a multilevel house, adding first floor height is measured at the threshold where you enter the front door. She stressed this is not a typical house measurement; reiterating multilevel homes are difficult to work with and are challenging for homeowners and builders. Continuing Aaker further noted the homeowner desires a garage and basement area. Aaker further

Page 2 of 6

Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 10/25/2017

pointed out that the City of Edina requires houses to have basements. Concluding, Aaker noted the basement ceiling height is proposed at 8’6”, which is not an unusual ceiling height in modern American homes.

Water Resources Coordinator Wilson explained that the City requires the basement elevation of a new home to be 2-feet higher than the FEMA base flood elevation. She noted the lowest level of the new home is 585.3 which is 3.9-feet lower than the minimum flood protection elevation. Coordinator Wilson also noted that it is the goal of the City and the Watershed District to elevate homes out of flood hazard areas when the opportunity presents itself, such as in this instance. Wilson pointed out that the variance request is the result of a zoning ordinance requirement that limits the first floor elevation of a new home to be no more than 1-foot above the existing. Wilson said in instances of floodplain that can be impossible to accomplish; reminding the Commission, they require a minimum raise of 2-feet.

Coordinator Wilson was asked to address house placement and fill. Wilson explained that in the rear yard area there would be minimal fill. She pointed out that the house is being positioned closer to the street to lessen impact. Wilson was also asked if part of the review process would include requiring the applicant to include drain titles and gutters when built. Wilson responded those requirements are not part of this process; however, they could be included in the storm water management plan at the time a building permit is applied for. Continuing, Wilson stressed that all runoff would be directed toward the street or to the creek, not onto adjacent properties.

Public Hearing

Vice-Chair Nemerov opened the public hearing.

The following residents spoke to the issue:

• DD Drays 5633 Woodcrest Drive, Edina, MN (across creek) • Martin Freeman, 5637 Woodcrest Drive, Edina, MN (across creek) • Kent Oaks, 3936 West 58 th Street, Edina, MN • Laurie Grotz, 5513 Park Place, Edina, MN • Tracy Eickhorn-Hickes, 5708 Woodland Lane, Edina, MN

A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lee. All voted aye. The motion carried.

Discussion/Comments

Commissioners shared the following:

• It was noted that a variance would be required to build any house on this lot to raise it out of the flood plain. It was also acknowledged that the subject site has unique restraints to include; the

Page 3 of 6

Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 10/25/2017

flood plain, required setback from the creek and a sewer line bisecting the site. These restraints reduce the size and location of the building pad. • It was pointed out that this is a low area. It was suggested that there are other options (variance for building without a basement) and other house designs that would reduce the visual impact. A thoughtful design could alleviate concerns expressed by neighboring property owners. In addition, when making a decision on if a variance should be granted it would be beneficial to the Commission to be able to review all drainage plans. It would be very helpful if those plans could also reflect the final as built. It is hard to make a decision when final information is not provided. • It was acknowledged that this is a tough balance. Reiterating the new home must be brought out of the flood plain. What is important to know is where the water is going, the rate of flow and how it is stored. The visual appearance of the house is subjective.

Confusion was expressed on the lack of information on drainage and erosion control. Mr. Porter referred to the drainage and erosion control plans found in the packets and highlighted how drainage and erosion control would be managed. With regard to fill, Porter said little fill would be required; except for constructing the new driveway.

Mr. Porter was asked if he submitted a permit to the Watershed District and if so were there any conditions to approval. Porter responded that at this time the Watershed District has not formally commented on the permit; however, they are aware of the permit, adding it is a normal review process for them. Porter said the Watershed District indicated to him that they did not see any issues. Porter noted the Watershed District does not comment on permits until after City review.

It was pointed out the variance requested is a height variance, adding that indicates height matters. An opinion was shared noting that the house depicted is similar to other new houses being built in Edina, adding that is not a bad thing; however, the variance is about height and the design of the new house is too tall. It was acknowledged that a masterful job was done in getting the house to fit on the site despite the lots many restraints; however, the homes design does not address the height with sensitivity. More could be done.

A discussion ensued on the option of tabling the variance request until final storm water management plans are completed and presented to the Commission. Planner Aaker responded that the Commission could ask the applicant if they want to table the issue and see if they were agreeable. It was noted by staff that adequate drainage and erosion control plans were submitted; however, it was acknowledged that the final plans are part of the building permit and engineering review processes. Aaker further explained that whatever decision is reached there is an appeal process.

The discussion ensued on water quality and the rate at which runoff would shed from the new driveway. Porter agreed that runoff from the new driveway would be quicker; however, the changes made to the front yard would slow down that rate. Porter said that in reality the driveway and changes to the front yard area would offset each other by slowing down the rate from the front yard and speeding it up from the driveway. The outcome of the storm water management plan would be net neutral.

Page 4 of 6

Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 10/25/2017

Resource Coord. Wilson explained to the Commission that the City does not regulate water quality for any building permit unless they are landlocked pieces; this is not. Water quality is part of the permit process with the watershed district.

Motion

A motion was made by Commissioner Hamilton to deny the variance as submitted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lee. Ayes; Lee, Hamilton. Nays; Thorsen, Strauss, Bennett, Nemerov. Motion to deny failed 2-4.

A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the variance based on staff findings and subject to staff, conditions with an additional comment that the Building and Engineering Departments are to pay careful attention to drainage and storm water runoff to ensure neighbors are not negatively impacted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. Ayes; Thorsen, Strauss, Bennett, Nemerov. Nay; Lee and Hamilton.

______

VI. Community Comment

None

VII. Correspondence And Petitions

Vice-chair Nemerov acknowledged back of packet materials.

VIII. Chair And Member Comments

Commissioners Strauss and Lee briefed the Commission on the status of the 70 th and Cahill Small Area Plan Working Group. The noted they met for the first time on October 5 th , adding it went well.

Commissioner Bennett shared comments on the 44 th and France Avenue Small Area Plan Working Group.

IX. Staff Comments

None

X. Adjournment

Commissioner Mittal moved to adjourn the meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 9:10 PM. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion to adjourn carried.

Page 5 of 6

Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 10/25/2017

Jackie Hoogenakker Respectfully submitted

Page 6 of 6

CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: B.2.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From: Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission, Nov. 14, Information Subject: 2017

ACTION REQUESTED:

INTRODUCTION:

ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission, Oct. 10, 2017 Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/14/2017

Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Edina Parks & Recreation Commission Edina City Hall, Council Chambers Tuesday, Oct. 10, 2017 7 p.m.

I. Call To Order Chair McCormick called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.

II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners McAwley, Willette, Nelson, Good, McCormick, Miller, Strother, Dahlien and Student Commissioners Kiely and Schieffert. Absent were: Commissioner Gieseke Commissioner Burke arrived at 7:04 p.m. Staff present: Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus and Administrative Coordinator Janet Canton

III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Good to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by McAwley. Motion carried.

IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Miller to approve the Sept. 12, 2017 minutes. Motion seconded by Strother. Motion carried.

V. Community Comment None

VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Todd Thorsen from the Planning Commission gave the Parks & Recreation Commission an overview of what the Comprehensive Plan is. He also talked about the Parks & Recreation Commission’s roll in the update of the Comprehensive Plan.

Commissioners asked questions.

Chair McCormick indicated Commissioners Good, McAwley and herself (Commissioner Nelson was unable to attend) met to discuss this Work Plan item and figure out how they should proceed. They would like all of the commissioners to read through the Parks & Recreation section of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and bring back their comments to the November meeting. She informed the commission that the working group will meet again on Thursday, Nov. 16 at 7:30 a.m. in the Mayor’s Conference Room to take the first stab at going through and highlighting what they think needs to be changed. She added all Parks & Recreation Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/14/2017

Commissioners are invited to attend and asked that they RSVP to Administrative Coordinator Canton by Nov. 1.

Chair McCormick informed the commission they need all of the commissioners to review other sections of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan to make sure they haven’t missed something where they might want to have input. Commissioners picked the following chapters to read:

Commissioner Good - Community Services & Facilities Commissioner McCormick - Water Resources Management Commissioner McAwley - Transportation Commissioner Nelson - Energy & Environment Commissioner Miller - Land Use Commissioner Strother - Housing Commissioner Burke - Heritage Preservation

B. Guiding Principles Commissioner Good discussed establishing guiding principles to help guide the Parks & Recreation Commission as they work on projects and park master plans. He discussed the five thoughts he had while thinking about some guiding principles. Chair McCormick thought it was a good start and a great idea to have three to four principles that will help guide them through future projects and master plans.

Commissioners asked questions, had discussions and gave suggestions.

Chair McCormick asked the commissioners to think about these guiding principles and bring back ideas to the November meeting.

C. 2017 Work Plan Update Chair McCormick briefly went over the 2017 Work Plan and the results of where they are to date.

VII. City Council Updates and Correspondence A. City Council Updates Sept. 19 and Oct. 3, 2017 Chair McCormick acknowledged the commission’s receipt of the City Council updates.

B. Correspondence Received through Oct. 4, 2017 Chair McCormick acknowledged the commission’s receipt of correspondence through Oct. 4, 2017.

VIII. Chair and Member Comments • Chair McCormick indicated Commissioner Good and herself attended the City Council Work Session on Oct. 3 to discuss the Commissions’ Annual Work Plans. They had a really good discussion on the Parks & Recreation 2018 Work Plan. Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/14/2017

• Commissioner Good informed the commission that a couple of the commissions talked about utilizing events in Edina such as Open Streets, Fall into the Arts, etc., to have a table set up with information regarding the parks. This will allow people to approach them with questions and complaints and it would be a good way to be available and involved. • Chair McCormick indicated the City Council felt the Field Capacity and Utilization Work Plan Initiative would be very helpful. • Chair McCormick indicated there will be a meeting regarding Arden Park on Oct. 26 at 6:45 p.m. and asked the commissioners to please make an effort to attend. • Commissioner Good informed the commission that last Friday he attended Edinborough Park’s 30 th year celebration and was very impressed with the level of activity inside the park. He noted he was also impressed by the fact that they host 1,300 birthday parties each year.

IX. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Kattreh gave the following updates: • The Tin Fish Restaurant at Braemar closed on Thursday, Oct. 5. • Staff is working on a RFP for a new restaurant vendor; the goal is to have a new vendor in place sometime during the second quarter of 2018. • The dome installation process will start today, Oct. 10. • The Futsal court will be removed on Oct. 17 and the process to install the Backyard Rink will begin. • The evaporative condenser on the south arena is going to be replaced the week of Oct. 16. • Adult volleyball started; there are 16 teams separated into women and co-rec leagues. • Registrations are being taken for the adult basketball league until the end of October; the league starts in November. • The Edina Boys Flag Football season is wrapping up at the end of October; this year there were 231 participants and over 20 volunteer coaches. • Staff is working with the Edina Baseball Association to submit an application for the Hennepin Council Youth Sports Grant to improve the lighting at Field #1 at Courtney Fields. • September was National Senior Center month; the Edina Senior Center celebrated by having programs above and beyond what is typically done on a daily basis and all programs were very well attended. • The Edina Art Center celebrated their 33 rd Annual Members Juried Art Exhibition on Thursday, Oct. 5; there were 72 works and 208 pieces were entered. The exhibit is on display through Nov. 8 • There are over 178 classes being offered at the Edina Art Center in the 2017-2018 Winter Directory. • On Oct. 6 Edinborough Park celebrated their 30 th anniversary; there were activities and programs throughout the day as well as discounted memberships. They sold 94 memberships for Adventure Peak and 10 memberships for the pool/track. They also offered a reduced daily admission and sold 386 general admissions. • On Oct. 6 Braemar Golf Dome hosted the Edina Education Fund, a very large non-golf event and it went very well. • On Oct. 7 Braemar Golf Course hosted the Edina Home Energy Fair. Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/14/2017

• On Oct. 13 Braemar Golf Course will be hosting the City’s Urban Vision Symposium. • On Oct. 18 and Nov. 15 Braemar Golf Course will be hosting a Wine and Canvas Event. • On Oct. 25 the Northwood’s Boutique will start moving into the Braemar Clubhouse; they will be open to the public from Oct. 27 through Nov. 12. • Nov. 1 will be the opening day for the golf dome. • There is now a Facebook link for construction updates of the new golf course; in addition to the updates there will also be pictures of the construction. • Centennial Lakes is in fall clean-up mode and is starting to shut things down for the season.

X. Adjournment Motion made by Willette to adjourn the Oct. 10, 2017 meeting at 7:51 p.m. Motion seconded by Good.

Motion carried.

CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: B.3.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From: Michael Frey, Art Center General Manager Item Activity: Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission Meeting, Information Subject: September 28, 2017

ACTION REQUESTED: There is no action required on this item.

INTRODUCTION: Please review the minutes from the regular meeting of September 28, 2017 of the Arts & Culture Commission. Thank you. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Minutes, Arts & Culture Commission Meeting 2017-09-28 Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: October 26, 2017

Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Arts and Culture Commission Edina Art Center Studio 14 September 28, 2017 4:30 p.m.

I. Call To Order

Chair Anne Miller called the meeting to order at 4:34 p.m.

II. Roll Call

Commissioners Present: Stella Chaffee, Susan Chandler, Cheryl Gunness, Heather Isaacs, Anne Miller and Russ Rubin, Steve Suckow

Commissioners Absent: Douglas Hegley, Ray Meifert

Student Commissioners Present: Brooke Sheehy

Student Commissioners Absent: Jane Howe

Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center

Guest Present: Karen Clark Sieben, Economic Development Consultant

New student representative Brooke Sheehy introduced herself to the commission.

III. Approval of Meeting Agenda

Motion by Commissioner Rubin with a second by Commissioner Chandler to approve the meeting agenda. Motion carried.

IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes

Motion by Commissioner Rubin with a second by Commissioner Chandler to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of August 24, 2017. Motion carried.

V. Special Recognitions and Presentations

A. New student representative Brooke Sheehy introduced herself to the Commission.

B. Economic Development Consultant Katie Clark Sieben presented a Power Point Presentation on the Grandview Green “lid” project over Highway 100 and the feasibility study of the project. A question of the feasibility study was “Are there any major fatal flaws with the concept?” The presentation on the 13 acres is being presented to City staff and commissions first, then to the public in November.

Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: October 26, 2017

Commissioners stated that as a commission they are encouraging council to consider a need for a new art center. Member Rubin expressed that the Commission would like the new art center to look like an art center. Member Chandler, as a runner, liked the idea of Grandview Green.

Ms. Clark Sieben stated public meetings are scheduled for November 9 and 13, and there is the possibility of a 3D model.

VI. Community Comment

No Community Members were present.

VII. Reports/Recommendations

A. 2017 Work Plan – Initiative #7 – City of Edina Comprehensive Plan

Chair Miller started the discussion and recommended small committees to review sections of the 2008 Comp Plan. Members Russ Rubin and Stella Chaffee offered to work on Parks, Open Spaces and Natural Resources and Members Cheryl Gunness, Anne Miller and Steve Suckow offered to work on Community Services and Facilities.

Members would provide a review of their findings of the 2008 Comp Plan at the October 2017 meeting.

B. 2018 Work Plan

The Commission finalized the five items on the 2018 ACC Work Plan and discussed priorities.

VIII. Adjournment

Commissioner Suckow motions to adjourn with a second by Commissioner Chandler. Motion carried.

The September 2017 Arts & Culture Commission meeting was adjourned at 5:51 p.m.

CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: B.4.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From: Sharon Allison, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission, Information Subject: October 12, 2017

ACTION REQUESTED: None.

INTRODUCTION: Receive the October 12, 2017, minutes of the Energy and Environment Commission. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Minutes: October 12, 2017 Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/9/2017

Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Energy and Environment Commission Edina City Hall, Community Room October 12, 2017 7:00pm

I. Call To Order Chair Manser called the October 12, 2017, meeting of the Energy & Environment Commission to order at 7:00 pm.

II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Fernands, Glahn, Hoffman, Horan, Jackson, Manser, Seeley, and Shanmugavel Late Arrival: Kostuch Absent Members: Waddick, Burmeister, and Madhok Staff Present: Staff Liaison, Tara Brown and Project Coordinator, MJ Lamon

III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Jackson to approve the October 12, 2017 meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Seeley. Motion carried.

IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Glahn to approve the September 14, 2017 meeting minutes. Motion seconded by Shanmugavel. Motion carried.

V. Special recognitions and presentations

A. Grandview Lid Project: Katie Clark Sieben, Economic Development Project Coordinator • Presentation on Grandview Green project and development.

Commissioner Kostuch arrived at 7:11 pm. Commissioner Glahn exited the room at 7:12 pm. Commissioner Glahn entered the room at 7:18 pm.

B. Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator • Presentation on comprehensive water resources management plan. • Commissioners will be asked for feedback prior to sending a recommendation to Council.

Commissioner Shanmugavel exited the room at 8:08 pm.

VI. Community Comment None.

Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/9/2017

VII. Reports and Recommendations

A. Comprehensive Plan Kick Off • Commission was provided information on the commission work objectives and timeline for the 2018 Comprehensive Plan update. • Commission Comprehensive Plan Tool-Kit was included as part of the meeting packet. • Planning Commission liaisons to the Energy and Environment Commission, Steve Hobbs and Jimmy Bennett, will be invited to attend an upcoming commission meeting.

Motion by Jackson to change the November meeting start time to 6:00 pm. Motion seconded by Hoffman. Motion carried.

B. Pollinator Resolution • The Pollinator Resolution was submitted to Commission in July of 2017. • The project would require staff resources and project coordination. • The Commission discussed the importance of the project outlined in the resolution but are unsure of available resources at this time.

VIII. Correspondence A. Attendance Report and Roster • Received, not discussed.

B. Working Group Minutes • Received, not discussed.

IX. Chair and Member Comments • Commissioner Fernands: Provided a summary of ideas created by the student group, SELC, working on sustainability initiatives. • Commissioner Jackson and Manser: Provided update on City Council work session meeting discussing Commission’s 2018 proposed work plan.

X. Staff Comments A. B3 Data • Staff Liaison Brown provided an updated B3 data report.

XI. Adjournment Motion by Glahn to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Jackson. Motion carried.

Meeting adjourned at 9:18 pm.

Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/9/2017

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION JFMAMJJASOND # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 NAME

Burmeister, Jeff 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Glahn, William 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Hoffman, Howard 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Horan, Michelle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Jackson, Carolyn 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Kostuch, Keith 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Manser, Richard 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Satterlee, Lauren 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Seeley, Melissa 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Shanmugavel, Ramesh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Waddick, Louise 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90%

Students: Fernands, Madeline 1 1 1 100% Kim, Joanna 1 1 1 1 4 40% Madhok, Gauri 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 60% CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: B.5.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From: Chante Mitchell, City Management Fellow Item Activity: Minutes: Human Rights And Relations Commission, Information Subject: October 24, 2017

ACTION REQUESTED: None.

INTRODUCTION: Receive the October 24, 2017 Human Rights and Relation Commission Minutes. ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

October 24 Minutes Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/14/17

Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Human Rights and Relations Commission Edina City Hall, Community Room October 24, 2017 7:00pm

I. Call To Order Chair Nelson called the October 24, 2017, meeting of the Human Rights and Relations Commission to order at 7:02 pm.

II. Roll Call Answering Roll Call: Chair Nelson and Commissioners Arseneault, Beringer, Edelson, Edwards, Kennedy and Student Commissioners Sinha and Mangalick. Late Arrivals: Commissioners Martin and Meek Absent Member: Commissioner Rivera Staff Present: Staff Liaison, MJ Lamon

III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Commissioner Kennedy to approve the meeting agenda for October 24, 2017. Seconded by Commissioner Edelson. Motion carried.

IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Commissioner Arseneault to approve the September 26, 2017 Human Rights and Relations Commission meeting minutes. Seconded by Edelson. Motion carried.

Commissioner Martin arrived at 7:04 pm.

Motion by Arseneault to approve the October 3, 2017 Special Meeting of the Human Rights and Relations Commission minutes. Seconded by Kennedy. Motion carried.

V. Community Comment None.

VI. Reports and Recommendations

Commissioner Meek arrived at 7:08 pm.

A. 2017 Work Plan Updates

Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/14/17 Race & Equity Update: • Arseneault provided an update on the October 18, 2017, GARE (Government Alliance on Race and Equity) meeting, and on the Race and Equity Community Meeting on October 23, 2017, at Southview Middle School. • Other opportunities for community engagement include the on-line survey, a second community meeting at Southview Middle School on December 4, 2017, and small group gatherings. • Commissioners are encouraged to attend the December community meeting or a small group meeting and / or provide information through the on-line survey.

Human Rights Essay Contest: • To date we have received one essay submission. • At the City Council work session, Council Member Brindle shared with Chair Nelson that there was a prior essay contest initiative sponsored by the Commission years ago that ended due to lack of interest.

Bias Offense Response Plan: • Commission amendments to the Bias Offense Response Plan were approved by City Council.

Comprehensive Plan Update: • Commissioners provided updates on reviews of comprehensive plan responsibilities and discussed potential ideas, including the creation of a separate chapter on Human Rights. • Committees will meet and report progress at the November Commission meeting.

B. Edina Community Foundation: MLK Panel Program • Edelson reported that the Edina Library is interested in adding the Human Rights and Relations Commission as a co-sponsor for this year’s MLK program with the Edina Community Foundation, and they would like a panel of 2 to 3 Commission members to discuss the Commission’s mission in our community. • Meek and Arseneault reported that past Human Rights and Relations Commission member Jessi Kingston is available and interested in participating. • Commissioner Meek & Student Commissioner Mangalick volunteered to be on the panel. • Event is on January 23, 2018, at 6:30 pm in the Fireside Room of the Edina Senior Center. Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/14/17

• Chair Nelson shared with the Commission that he was advised this event does not need to be on the Commission’s 2018 work plan for commission members to participate.

Motion by Edelson to move the January 23, 2018 meeting date to January 30, 2018 at 7:00 pm. Seconded by Commissioner Martin. Motion carried.

C. 2018 Proposed Work Plan Update • Chair Nelson presented the Commission’s 2018 Proposed work plan to City Council at their October 3 work session. • Chair Nelson shared Council’s comments on the work plan.

VII. Correspondence Received, no discussion.

VIII. Chair and Member Comments • Commissioner Kennedy provided information on a November 5 event at the Edina Senior Center featuring Jessi Kingston, and on events in St. Paul on November 16 on Syria and on December 16 on post Holocaust prosecutions and the rise of Neo-Nazis. • Commissioner Edelson reported on her review of the community feedback on the last Sharing Values, Sharing Communities event. The feedback included suggestions for possible future program topics. • Student Commissioner Mangalick described an upcoming event at the Mall of America focusing on leadership for girls. • Commissioner Arseneault recommended to the Commission the TPT documentary, Out North, on LGBTQ+ community activism in Minnesota. • Commissioner Edwards indicated her interest in learning what draws people to Edina’s parks and noted it would be helpful in working on the Comprehensive Plan to have more data on who uses (and does not use) parks and why. • Commissioner Beringer reminded people to vote. • Commissioner Martin noted the importance of the vote on the school levy.

IX. Staff Comments None.

X. Adjournment Motion by Kennedy to adjourn meeting. Seconded by Arseneault. Motion carried.

Meeting adjourned at 8:15 pm. Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 11/14/17

CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov

Date: November 21, 2017 Agenda Item #: XII.

To: Mayor and City Council Item Type:

From: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Schedule of Meetings and Events as of November 21, Information Subject: 2017

ACTION REQUESTED: None

INTRODUCTION:

ATTACHMENTS:

Descr ipt ion

Schedule of Meetings & Events as of November 21, 2017 CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS

Tues Nov 21 Work Session: Water Resources Management Plan 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thurs Nov 23 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Nov 24 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues Dec 5 Work Session: Comprehensive Plan Check -in/2018 -2019 Budget 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 19 HRA Work Session: TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session: TDB 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Mon Jan 1 NEW YEARS DAY HOLIDAYI OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed Jan 3 Work Session: TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jan 15 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed Jan 17 HRA Work Session: TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session: TBD Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS