DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Draft State Heritage Register Nomination Form 2. Balls Head Coal Loader Wharf Heritage Assessment 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Draft State Heritage Register Nomination Form 2. Balls Head Coal Loader Wharf Heritage Assessment 3 ITEM CiS11 REPORTS 14/06/16 NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL REPORTS Report to General Manager Attachments: 1. Draft State heritage Register Nomination Form 2. Balls Head Coal Loader Wharf Heritage Assessment 3. Coal Loader Structural Report ___________________________________________________________________________ SUBJECT: Balls Head Coal Loader Wharf - Nomination on the State Heritage Register and Application for an Interim Heritage Order AUTHOR: Stephen Beattie, Manager Development Services ENDORSED BY: Joseph Hill Director City Strategy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report has been prepared in response to recent correspondence from the RMS indicating their intention to demolish the Balls Head Coal Loader Wharf in its entirety, due to safety risks posed by the deteriorating structure. The RMS is currently preparing a Review of Environmental Factors for the full removal of the wharf. The Coal Loader Wharf is currently listed as a heritage item within NSLEP 2013.However, the Coal Loader Wharf was assessed as having heritage significance at State level in the Waverton Peninsular Industrial Sites Conservation Management Plan 2000. This matter was extensively discussed in the Report of David Banbury, Landscape Architect which was considered by Council at its December 2015 meeting. The Office of Environment and Heritage advised Council, in a letter dated 27 January 2016, that if a detailed study of the subject item concludes that it may be of state significance, consideration should be given to its nomination on the State Heritage Register. In light of the current RMS proposal to demolish the wharf in its entirety, it is now considered appropriate that the nomination for listing on the State Heritage Register be expedited, in order to ensure the best possible conservation outcome for the Wharf. Full demolition of the wharf, with no retention of fabric, is considered to be the worst possible outcome for the wharf, in heritage terms. Council has recently engaged a heritage architect and engineer to review the significance and condition of the wharf, and provide advice as the current level of significance, detailed analysis of its current condition, and appropriate course of action. The consultant has concluded that the Wharf is of State Significance for its historic, associative, aesthetic and technical values. It has been assessed to have high comparative significance values, and is considered to make a high contribution to the heritage significance of the Coal Loader site as a whole. These reports are attached for Councils information. Report of: Stephen Beattie, Manager Development Services Re: Coal Loader Wharf State Heritage Listing and Interim Heritage Order (2) The consultant has provided a DRAFT State Heritage Register Nomination Form for the Wharf. Given the immediate threat to the Wharf by the proposed demolition, the Heritage Office has also recommended that Council request that the Heritage Council consider placing an Interim Heritage Order on the Wharf to protect the structure while the Nomination for State Listing is being considered. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: There are no costs to North Sydney Council resulting from the nomination of the Coal Loader Wharf on the State Heritage Register, or the application for an Interim Heritage Order. Local Government Act 1993: Section 23A Guidelines - Council Decision Making During Merger Proposal Period. The Guidelines have been considered in the preparation of this report and are not applicable. RECOMMENDATION: 1. THAT the report be received. 2. THAT Council resolve to nominate the Balls Head Coal Loader Wharf on the State Heritage Register. 3. THAT Council resolve to apply to the Heritage Council for an Interim Heritage Order on the Balls Head Coal Loader Wharf. Report of: Stephen Beattie, Manager Development Services Re: Coal Loader Wharf State Heritage Listing and Interim Heritage Order (3) LINK TO DELIVERY PROGRAM Direction: 2. Our Built Environment Outcome: 2.4 North Sydney’s Heritage is preserved and valued BACKGROUND: The Ball’s Head Coal Loader Wharf is currently listed as a heritage item within NSLEP 2013. However, the Coal Loader Wharf was assessed as having heritage significance at state level in the Waverton Peninsular Industrial Sites Conservation Management Plan 2000. The Wharf has been under the care and management of RMS since it was decommissioned in 1992. During that period, Council has held various discussions with RMS regarding options for the future of the Coal Loader Wharf. On 17 September 2015, the RMS advised Council that they were intending to remove the entire Coal Loader Wharf under Part 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act. Although the wharf is listed as a heritage item within NSLEP 2013, RMS advised that its demolition does not require development consent because the work is actively related to navigation safety under Clause 68(5)(d) of the SEPP Infrastructure. The RMS provided a Statement of Heritage Impact, and invited Council to comment. On 11 November 2015, Council staff met with RMS representatives to discuss the proposal and request consideration of alternatives to full removal. Council’s Landscape Architect presented an option for the retention and adaptive reuse of a small section of the wharf attached to the land. On 7 December 2015, Council considered a report by Council’s Landscape Architect regarding the RMS proposal for demolition of the wharf, and resolved: 1. THAT Council endorse in-principle the concept to retain and adaptively reuse a portion of the old coal loader wharf on Balls Head Bay in Waverton for heritage interpretation and public access. 2. THAT Council engage in further discussions with Roads & Maritime Services with regards the design, funding and ongoing management. On 3 March 2016, Council staff met with RMS to discuss the Council resolution and preferred option for adaptive reuse. At that meeting, and in later correspondence, RMS indicated that their intention is to proceed with the removal of the wharf in its entirety. Further, they would not be prepared to provide any input into or funding for the adaptive reuse or reconstruction of any part of the wharf. In addition, the RMS could not guarantee that approval would be granted for the rebuilding of part of the wharf. Report of: Stephen Beattie, Manager Development Services Re: Coal Loader Wharf State Heritage Listing and Interim Heritage Order (4) SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT The adoption of the recommendations of this report will provide the “next steps” to ensure appropriate conservation of the Coal Loader Wharf for future generations. DETAIL The RMS is now progressing their plan to demolish the wharf in its entirety and is currently preparing a Review of Environmental Factors for the full removal of the wharf under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure). In order to determine the best possible heritage outcome for the wharf, Council has engaged a heritage architect (Jennifer Hill of Architectural Projects) and engineer (Simon Wiltshier of Mott McDonald), who have expertise in structures of this nature, to review the current significance and condition of the wharf, and provide advice as to the most appropriate course of action. The consultants have now provided a Heritage Assessment Report and preliminary Condition Report. The Heritage Assessment Report has concluded that the Wharf is of State Significance for its historic, associative, aesthetic and technical values. It has been assessed to have high comparative significance values, and is considered to make a high contribution to the heritage significance of the Coal Loader site as a whole. The Office of Environment and Heritage advised Council, in a letter dated 27 January 2016, that if a detailed study of the subject item concludes that it may be of state significance, consideration should be given to its nomination on the State Heritage Register. In light of the current RMS proposal to demolish the wharf in its entirety, the consultants have advised that it is now considered appropriate that the nomination for listing on the State Heritage Register be expedited, in order to ensure the best possible conservation outcome for the Wharf. The consultant has provided a DRAFT State Heritage Register Nomination Form for the Wharf, which is attached to this report. Given the immediate threat to the Wharf by the proposed demolition, the Heritage Office has also recommended that Council request that the Heritage Council consider placing an Interim Heritage Order on the Wharf to protect the structure while the Nomination for State Listing is being considered. Although the wharf is already listed in NSLEP, the Heritage Council can consider placing an Interim Heritage Order on a structure that has been determined to be of State significance, if under immediate threat. Should the application for State Listing be successful, the office of environment and heritage will become involved in the decisions about the future of the wharf and its interpretation. Report of: Stephen Beattie, Manager Development Services Re: Coal Loader Wharf State Heritage Listing and Interim Heritage Order (5) CONCLUSION Independent consultants have recently reviewed the heritage significance of the Coal Loader Wharf, and determined it to be of State Significance. Due to the immediate threat of its demolition, it is recommended that Council proceed immediately with the Nomination of the Coal Loader Wharf for inclusion on the State Heritage Register. It is further recommended that Council submit an application to the Heritage Council for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Laird of Shoalhaven
    lllawarra Historical Society Bulletin April, 1980 13 THE LAIRD OF SHOALHAVEN: Miss Rachel Roxburgh, the speaker at our February meeting, is well known to most of our members, either personally or by reputa­ tion, particularly for her work on the National Trust. Her subject was "The Berry Estate at Coolangatta." Alexander Berry, born in Fife in 1781 , studied medicine at St. Andrews and Edinburgh, and became a surgeon in the East India Company's service. After three voyages to the East he left the service and medicine, partly, it is said, because he disliked the flog­ ging of seamen, partly because he saw greater opportunities in trading. Over the next few years he made several trading voyages, in the course of which he visited Van Diemen's Land , New South Wales and New Zealand, where he rescued the survivors of the Boyd massacre (including Betsy Broughton, afterwards Mrs. Charles Throsby of Throsby Park). Deciding to settle in New South Wales, Berry and his brother-in­ law Edward Wollstonecraft established a mercantile business in Sydney, and obtained from Governor Brisbane a promise of a grant of 10,000 acres on condition of taking and maintaining 100 convicts. They selected a site on the Shoalhaven. Wollstonecraft died not long after the qrant issued; but Berry expanded his estates by further grants and purchases till Coolangatta ultimately became the capital of a principality of more than 40,000 acres. He established on Brough­ ton Creek a private town, which now bears his name. To give his domain reliable communication with Sydney, he had a canal cut between the Shoalhaven River and Crookhaven, enabling ships to bypass the perilous bar at the river-mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Career of Alexander Berry, 1781-1873
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 1992 Aspects of the career of Alexander Berry, 1781-1873 Barry John Bridges University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Bridges, Barry John, Aspects of the career of Alexander Berry, 1781-1873, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Department of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shoalhaven Chronograph with Berry Newsletter April - May 2017
    Berry and District Historical Society Inc www.berryhistory.org.au email: [email protected] The Shoalhaven Chronograph with Berry Newsletter April - May 2017 In this issue: • Dates for your Diary • Notice of AGM • Shoalhaven International Women's Day Awards • Public Lecture by Les Bursill, Indigenous Anthropologist • Berry Silver Band • Volunteers Wanted • Trivia • Articles Wanted for the Next Issue • Nomination Form Dates for your Diary 6th May 1 pm ‐ Berry Silver Band will perform at the Museum. Please RSVP. 9th May 2 pm – B&DHS public lecture at Masonic Village Hall, Albany Street, Berry 9th May 4 pm – The B&DHS AGM will be held after the lecture by Les Bursill Annual General Meeting of the Berry & District Historical Society The B&DHS AGM will be held on Tuesday 9th May at 4.00 pm, after the lecture by Les Bursill at the Masonic Village, Albany Street, Berry. Calling all Museum members and volunteers We need some new people to nominate for the Committee. Some of our members have served on the Committee for more than 10 years. To make our Management Committee viable and for the Historical Society to continue to function we need some new Committee volunteers. We desperately need a Secretary and also a Research Coordinator. You need to complete a nomination form and send it to PO Box 153 Berry or place it in the President’s in tray in the Museum by 25th April 2017. Your President You will find a copy of the nomination form on the last page of this newsletter. The Shoalhaven Chronograph with Berry Newsletter April‐May 2017 Page 1 Shoalhaven International Women’s Day Awards A group of special Shoalhaven women were acknowledged for their services to their community during the Shoalhaven City Council International Women's Day Awards on Sunday 18th of March at Meroogal House.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Career of Alexander Berry, 1781-1873 Barry John Bridges University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Thesis Collections University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Year Aspects of the career of Alexander Berry, 1781-1873 Barry John Bridges University of Wollongong Bridges, Barry John, Aspects of the career of Alexander Berry, 1781-1873, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Department of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, 1992. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1432 This paper is posted at Research Online. 525 LIST OF SOURCES The sources listed here are those used for Berry's life as a whole. No attempt has been made to confine the list to sources mentioned in the reference notes by identifying and deleting sources for chapters on matters not included in this thesis or lost in cutting the text. Item details have been taken, as far as possible, from title pages. As a consequence, in some items usage varies from mine in the text of the thesis. Anonymous items have been placed at the end of sections and listed chronologically by date of publication. Where the author has been identified his name is indicated in square brackets. PRIMARY SOURCES ARCHIVES SCOTTISH RECORD OFFICE, NEW REGISTER HOUSE, EDINBURGH Old Parish Registers OPR 351/2 Errol Births/Marriages 1692 - 1819. OPR 420/3 Cupar Baptisms/Marriages/Deaths 1778 - 1819. OPR 420/4 Cupar OPR 445/1 Leuchars Births/Marriages 1665 - 1819. OPR 445/2 Leuchars Births/Marriages 1820 - 1854, Deaths 1720 - 1854. OPR 446/1 Logie. OPR 446/2 Logie. OPR 453/3 St Andrews and St Leonards Births. Sherriff Court SC 49/31/8 Sheriff Court of Perth - for inventories of estate of James Berrie 10 March 1828.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Heritage Study April 2016 1
    Camden Residents’ Action Group Incorporated Camden – Still a Country Town HERITAGE STUDY CAMDEN NEW SOUTH WALES Documentary Evidence addressing criteria for statutory heritage listing Photo: Robert Wheeler Camden Residents' Action Group Inc | Camden Heritage Study April 2016 1 Author: Glenda Davis President Camden Residents' Action Group Acknowledgments: Charles Cowell, photographer Dr Peter Cuneo, Consultant horticulturist and research scientist Keith Hart, Environmental Lawyer District Veterinarian, Camden (retired) Former Councillor, Camden (1991-95) Lorraine Iddon David Nethercote Sue Way Robert Wheeler, Senior town planner for Camden Council (retired) Photo: Charles Cowell Camden Residents' Action Group Inc | Camden Heritage Study April 2016 2 Contents A. Nominated Place ............................................................................................................................. 4 Camden Heritage Conservation Area (LEP listed) ...................................................................... 4 B. Significance ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Statement of State Significance ....................................................................................................... 5 Eminent Testimonials on Heritage Significance of Camden Township ........................................ 10 Emeritus Professor Alan Atkinson University of Sydney ............................................................... 10 Associate
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Papers of the Berry, Wollstonecraft and Hay Families
    Guide to the papers of the BERRY, WOLLSTONECRAFT AND HAY FAMILIES in the Mitchell Library, State Library of New South Wales Arranged and described by Janet Anderson of the Manuscripts Section, completed 1990 State Library of New South Wales Sydney, 1993 i. CONTENTS PAGES Provenance note iv Chronology v-xvii Plan of the Berry estate, Shoalhaven River xviii region, NSW, 1853 General description 1-8 Detailed contents list: Berry and Wollstonecraft, Partners 9-17 Alexander Berry 17-27 Edward Wollstonecraft 27-28 Elizabeth Berry 28 Berry Family 28 James Berry 29 John Berry 29 Charles John Campbell, Agent 29 David Berry 30-31 William Berry 31 'Berry estate letters' 31-32 Coolangatta Brass Band 32 Sir John Hay 32-37 James Tod Hay 38 Jessie Sinclair Hay 38 Alexander Hay 38-39 William G. Mathews 40 Printed material 40 Newspapers shelved with the manuscripts 41-43 ii. Index to correspondents of Berry and 44-72 Wollstonecraft, Partners Index to correspondents of Berry and 73-75 Wollstonecraft and others as office bearers of the Agricultural Society of New South Wales Index to correspondents of Alexander Berry 76-103 Index to correspondents of Edward Wollstonecraft 104-107 Index to correspondents of Elizabeth Berry 108-109 Index to correspondents of John Berry 110-111 Index to correspondents of David Berry 112-126 Index to correspondents of William Berry 127 Pictorial material and relics Portraits 128-130 Places and subjects 131-133 Relics 133 Family tree of Berry Family 134 Family tree of Wollstonecraft Family 135 Family tree of Hay Family 136 Family tree of Simpson Family .
    [Show full text]
  • 76. INDEX to CORRESPONDENTS ALEXANDER BERRY This Is A
    INDEX TO CORRESPONDENTS ALEXANDER BERRY This is a comprehensive index to correspondents in volumes 46-52, 54, item 3 and 78. Unless prefaced by * correspondence is between Alexander Berry and the person named. Where a person has corresponded with Alexander Berry and with other persons two entries have been made. Dates which are underlined indicate letters by Berry to the correspondent, rather than letters received by Berry. NAME DATE V. PAGES ABBOTT, EDWARD 29 Jan. 1820 46 4 ADAIR, JOHN 9 July 1834 46 401-404 ADAMS, PHILIP FRANCIS See NEW SOUTH WALES - Surveyor General ALDCORN, ANDREW 2 Nov. 1857 48 223e-223g 6 Nov. 1857 48 223i-223k ARMIT, BARBARA, Mrs 1 May 1846 52 1-4 David, nee Berry 1 June 1848 52 5-8 15 Oct. 1850 52 9-12 12 Mar. 1853 52 13-15 18 Mar. 1853 52 17-20 20 Dec. 1864 52 21-22 22 Mar. 1867 52 23-29 6 May 1868? 52 31-33 ARMIT, DAVID 19 Jan. 1848 52 35c-36 copy 52 37 ARMIT, GEORGE 9 June 1871 52 39-42 21 Mar. 1873 52 43-44 ARMSTRONG, JOSEPH 21 Dec. 1848 47 297c-298 76. *ARNHEIM, E H, 30 Nov. 1864 49 369a-369c 371 Surveyor copy 49 373-374 ATKINSON, E H? 9 Feb. 1859 48 257-258 ATKINSON, JAMES 25 Oct. 1822 46 103-106 4 June 1829 46 259-264 9 Feb. 1834 46 389-391 AUSTRALIAN HOTEL 9 Jan. 1845 47 199c BANNISTER, SAKE? c.23 July 1825 46 189-191 BANNISTER, SAXE 10 Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Archaeological Assessment & Research Design
    HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT & RESEARCH DESIGN APPENDIX H Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham - ARD Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham Historical Archaeological Assessment & Research Design Report to Jacobs / Arcadis / RPS FINAL_14102016 October 2016 Page i Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham - ARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Background The proposed Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham project (the project) is the subject of this Historical Archaeological Assessment and Research Design (ARD). The project would involve construction and operation of an underground rail line, about 15.5 kilometres long, and new stations between Chatswood and Sydenham. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) identified the potential for archaeological constraints and the need for the preparation of a historical ARD (mitigation measure NAH2) at all surface construction sites except Artarmon traction substation and Marrickville dive site (southern). This ARD has been prepared to comply with mitigation measure NAH2. The ten sites that are considered in this report are: x Chatswood dive site (northern) x Crows Nest Station x Victoria Cross Station x Blues Point temporary site x Barangaroo Station x Martin Place Station x Pitt Street Station x Central Station x Waterloo Station x Power Supply Routes – various locations near the metro rail line route. Archaeological Management The station and construction sites have been divided into archaeological management zones based on archaeological potential and construction impacts as submitted with the EIS. Archaeological management zone mapping provided in Section 13.3 is based on a ‘traffic light’ coding: x Red (Zone 1): Direct impact to significant archaeology. Archaeological investigation required prior to any construction impacts (bulk excavation etc.) x Amber (Zone 2): Potential impact to significant archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Analysis
    HERITAGE ANALYSIS Draft St Leonards and Crows Nest 2036 Plan September 2018 | J2658 Level 19, 100 William Street, Sydney, NSW 2011 Phone: (02) 8076 5317 CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PREAMBLE 1 1.2 AUTHORSHIP 1 1.3 LIMITATIONS 1 1.4 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 1 1.4.1 GENERAL REFERENCES 2 1.4.2 MAPS, PLANS AND PHOTOGRAPHS 2 1.5 LOCATION 2 1.6 PRECINCT OVERVIEW 3 2.0 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT 7 2.1 ORIGINAL OCCUPATION 7 2.2 NORTH SYDNEY BEFORE 1850 7 2.3 SUMMARY OF HERITAGE SITES WITHIN THE PRECINCT 9 3.0 DRAFT ST LEONARDS AND CROWS NEST 2036 PLAN 9 4.0 RESPONSE TO DRAFT 2036 PLAN 12 4.1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES: 12 4.2 HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS 12 4.3 TRANSITIONS TO HERITAGE CONSERVATION AREA 13 4.4 RESPOND TO FINE GRAIN 15 4.5 VISUAL IMPACT 16 4.6 OVERSHADOWING 17 4.7 VIEW CORRIDORS 18 4.8 URBAN DESIGN INTERFACE 19 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 1. APPENDIX 1 - INDIVIDUAL HERITAGE ITEMS AND INTERFACE TREATMENTS FOR HERITAGE ITEMS /HCA 21 This report was prepared by Weir Phillips Heritage for the Department of Planning and Environment for information only. Advice in this report reflects the independent opinions of Weir Phillips Heritage at the time the analysis was undertaken and does not represent the views of the Department of Planning and Environment and/or the relevant Council . WEIR PHILLIPS HERITAGE | Draft St Leonards and Crows Nest 2036 Plan | September 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Preamble This Heritage Analyis has been prepared to guide the heritage aspects of the Draft St Leonards and Crows Nest 2036 Plan (Draft 2036 Plan) being developed by NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DPE).
    [Show full text]
  • For a Labourer Worthy of His Hire: Aboriginal Economic Responses to Colonisation in the Illawarra and Shoalhaven, 1770-1900 Volume 1
    For a Labourer Worthy of His Hire: Aboriginal Economic Responses to Colonisation in the Illawarra and Shoalhaven, 1770-1900 Volume 1 Michael Bennett Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Canberra © 2003 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA FORM B Certificate of Authorship of Thesis Except as specially indicated in footnotes, quotations and the bibliography, I certify that I am the sole author of the thesis submitted today entitled— For a Labourer Worthy of His Hire: Aboriginal Economic Responses to Colonisation in the Illawarra and Shoalhaven 1770-1900 in terms of the Statement of Requirements for a Thesis issued by the University Higher Degrees Committee. Signature of Author Date ___23 April 2003____________ For a Labourer Worthy of His Hire: Aboriginal Economic Responses to Colonisation in the Illawarra and Shoalhaven 1770-1900 Abstract This thesis presents a narrative of Aboriginal economic responses in the 19th century to the colonisation of the Shoalhaven and Illawarra regions of New South Wales. It explores the competing claims of articulation theory and dependency theory about the intersection of colonial and indigenous economies. Dependency theory claims that settlers destroy the indigenous mode of production to permit the expansion of their own economic system. They exploit indigenous labour which then becomes dependent on capitalist sources of subsistence. Articulation theory, as modified by Layton (2001) to recognise the bi-directional nature of contact, posits that the rate of capitalist penetration into indigenous economies is variable and that the non-capitalist mode of production may be preserved to create a self-supporting source of labour. The contrasting theories are assessed in this thesis by determining the contribution different strategies made to Aboriginal subsistence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Fishing: Sustainable Living in Colonial New South Wales
    The economics of fishing: sustainable living in colonial New South Wales Michael Bennett Introduction James Bell, as part of his analysis of assimilation at La Perouse, presented a historical sketch of Aboriginal society on the south coast of New South Wales,1 in which he asserted that by the late 1850s, when the full impact of land alienation was being felt, Aboriginal people on the south coast had become fully dependent upon white society.2 According to Bell, up until that time, Aboriginal men had found casual work in cedar cutting, grazing and whaling, but by the late 1850s these industries had collapsed. Even though the dairy industry was taking off at this time, it had little need of outside labour. Bell claimed that by the 1860s and 1870s Aborigines had become an ‘uprooted people reduced to pauperdom’.3 This article examines evidence of Indigenous fishing in the Illawarra and Shoal- haven regions of the south coast of New South Wales in the 19th century to explore Bell’s claim of dependence. Building on the work of Brian Egloff and Scott Cane, the purpose of my study is to examine Indigenous fishing from the pre-colonial period until the end of the 19th century and ascertain if fishing offered a means for Illawarra and Shoalhaven Aboriginal people to partly maintain economic independence in the face of colonisation. The picture that emerges is more complex than Bell envisaged. The study area The study area encompasses the Illawarra and Shoalhaven districts of the south coast of New South Wales, including the cities of Wollongong and Nowra.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of the Australian Monetary System 1788-1851
    Foundations of the Australian Monetary System 1788-1851 Butlin, S. J. (1910-1977) University of Sydney Library Sydney, Australia 2002 http://setis.library.usyd.edu.au/oztexts © University of Sydney Library. The texts and images are not to be used for commercial purposes without permission Source Text: Prepared from the print edition published by Sydney University Press Sydney 1968 Reproduced with permission. All quotation marks are retained as data. First Published: 1953 332.4994/33 setis australian etexts prose nonfiction 1940- Foundations of the Australian Monetary System 1788-1851 Professor of Economics, University of Sydney Sydney Sydney University Press 1968 Preface THE story of Australian money is peculiarly fascinating for it is possible to trace its development from the primitive beginnings in a penal colony with no initial monetary arrangements through to a fully fledged modern system. This has more than its individual interest, for the opportunity to study in detail an economy built up from its earliest beginnings should throw light on the general theory of economic development. That theory, in its various presentations, presupposes a fully developed economy, of a capitalist type, and neither of its two most impressive contributions (by Marx and Schumpeter) is an exception. For the present study the year 1851 was chosen in advance as a halting point, as being the year of the separation of Victoria from New South Wales and of the discovery of gold, closely followed by the coming of responsible government. It has proved fully justified after the event, for, as the story will show, one finds development pausing in the late 'forties, different sections of the monetary system reflecting the temporary stability of the economy as a whole.
    [Show full text]