Select Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Select Bibliography Select Bibliography 1 Pre-Modern Works Ael. Nat.anim. Aelian. De Natura Animalium libri xvii, varia Historia, Epistolae, Fragmenta. Ed. R. Hercher. Leipzig 1864. Alb. Phys. Albertus Magnus. Physica. Pars I, Libri 1–4. Crit. ed. P. Hossfeld. Westphalia 1987. Amb. Hymn. Ambrose of Milan. Hymnes. Crit. ed. with tr. and comm. J.-L. Charlet, S. Deléani, Y.-M. Duval, J. Fontaine, et al. Paris 1992. Amm. R.gest. Ammianus Marcellinus. Ammianus Marcellinus, volume I. Ed. with tr. J.C. Rolfe. London 1950. Anon. C.Phil. Anonymous. Anonymi Contra Philosophos. (CCSL 58.a.) Crit. ed. D. Aschoff. Turnhout 1975. Aq. S.Th. Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae. Pars Prima et Prima Secundae. Ed. P. Caramello. Turin 1952. Ar. Rhyth. Aristoxenus. Elementa Rhythmica. The Fragment of Book II and the Additional Evidence for Aristoxenan Rhythmic Theory. Ed. L. Pearson. Oxford 1990. Arist. Anim. Aristotle. On the Soul. On Parva Naturalia. On Breath. Ed. with tr. W.S. Hett. London 1957. Arist. Aud. Aristotle. “On Things Heard (De Audibilibus).” Aristotle. Minor Works. Ed. with tr. W.S. Hett. London 1963. Arist. Cat. Aristotle. “The Categories.” Aristotle. The Organon. Ed. with tr. H.P. Cooke and H. Tredennick. London 1955. Arist. Gen.corr. Aristotle. On Sophistical Refutations. On Coming-to-Be and Passing- Away. Ed. with tr. E.S. Forster and D.J. Furley. London 1955. Arist. Mem. Aristotle. “On Memory and Recollection.” On the Soul. Parva Naturalia. On Breath. Ed. with tr. W.S. Hett. London 1957. Arist. Met. Aristotle. Metaphysics, books I–IX. Ed. with tr. H. Tredennick. London 1933. Arist. Phys. Aristotle. The Physics. 2 vols. Ed. with tr. P.H. Wicksteed and F.M. Cornford. London 1929. Arist. Poet. Aristotle. Aristotle, The Poetics. ‘Longinus,’ On the Sublime. Demetrius, On Style. Ed. with tr. W.H. Fyfe and W.R. Roberts. London 1932. Arist. Post. Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. Topica. Ed. with tr. H. Tredennick and E.S. Forster. London 1966. Select Bibliography 335 Arist. Prob. Aristotle. Problems I, books I–XXI. Ed. with tr. W.S. Hett. London 1926. Arist. Rhet. Aristotle. The Art of Rhetoric. Ed. with tr. J.H. Freese. London 1967. Arist. Sens. Aristotle. “On Sense and Sensible Objects.” On the Soul. Parva Naturalia. On Breath. Ed. with tr. W.S. Hett. London 1957. Arist.Lat. Phys. Aristotle. Physica. Translatio Vetus. (Aristoteles Latinus 7.1, fasc. 2.) Crit. ed. F. Bossier and J. Brams. Leiden 1990. Arist.Lat. Rhet. Aristotle. Rhetorica. Translatio Anonyma sive Vetus et Translatio de Guillelmi de Moerbeka. (Aristoteles Latinus 31.1–2.) Crit. ed. B. Schneider. Leiden 1978. Arr. Ind. Arrian. Anabasis Alexandri, Books V–VII. Indica. Ed. with tr. E.I. Robson. London 1933. Aug. 83 quaest. (i) Augustine. De diversis quaestionibus octoginta tribus. De octo Dulcitii quaestionibus. (CCSL 44.a.) Crit. ed. A. Mutzenbecher. Turnhout 1975. (ii) Augustine. De diversis Quæstionibus octoginta tribus liber unus. (Patrologia Latina 40.) Ed. J.-P. Migne. Paris 1887. (iii) Augustine. Eighty-Three Different Questions. Tr. D.L. Mosher. Washington, D.C. 1977. Aug. An.orig. Augustine. De Anima et ejus Origine libri IV. (Patrologia Latina 44.) Ed. J.-P. Migne. Paris 1865. Aug. Annot. Augustine. Annotationum in Job liber unus. (Patrologia Latina 34.) Ed. J.-P. Migne. Paris 1887. Aug. Beat. Augustine. Contra Academicos. De beata vita. De ordine. De magis- tro. De libero arbitrio. (CCSL 29.) Crit. ed. W.M. Green and K.-D. Daur. Turnhout 1970. Aug. C.Acad. Idem. Aug. C.Faust. Augustine. De Utilitate Credendi. De Duabus Animabus Contra Fortunatum. Contra Adimantum. Contra Epistulam Fundamenti. Contra Faustum. (CSEL 25.) Crit. ed. I. Zycha. Leipzig 1891. Aug. C.Parm. Augustine. Contra epistulam Premeniani libri tres. Crit. ed. M. Petschenig. Scripta Contra Donatistas, pars I. Ed. M. Petschenig. Leipzig 1907. [Repr. 1963.] Aug. Civ. (i) Augustine. De Civitate Dei, Libri I–X. (CCSL 47.) Crit. ed. B. Dombart and A. Kalb. Turnhout 1955. (ii) Augustine. De Civitate Dei, Libri XI–XXII. (CCSL 48.) Crit. ed. B. Dombart and A. Kalb. Turnhout 1955. (iii) Augustine. De civitate Dei libri XXII. (Patrologia Latina 41.) Ed. J.-P. Migne. Paris 1900..
Recommended publications
  • Investigations of Worth: Towards a Phenomenology of Values Dale Hobbs Jr
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Investigations of Worth: Towards a Phenomenology of Values Dale Hobbs Jr. Marquette University Recommended Citation Hobbs, Dale Jr., "Investigations of Worth: Towards a Phenomenology of Values" (2017). Dissertations (2009 -). 740. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/740 INVESTIGATIONS OF WORTH: TOWARDS A PHENOMENOLOGY OF VALUES by Dale (D.J.) Hobbs A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, WI August 2017 ABSTRACT INVESTIGATIONS OF WORTH: TOWARDS A PHENOMENOLOGY OF VALUES Dale (D.J.) Hobbs Marquette University, 2017 The purpose of this dissertation is to provide a clear and compelling account of the existence and nature of values within a phenomenological context. Values such as beauty or virtue are certainly a major part of our experiential lives. After all, what would life be worth if we could never describe a painting as beautiful, for example, or a beverage as delicious? Nevertheless, understanding what these values are on their own terms has historically been a rather difficult task. Certainly, they are not ordinary objects that could be seen or heard, touched or tasted, like the physical objects to which they seem to be connected in some mysterious way. In this dissertation, I argue that a phenomenological approach enables us to give a solid account of the role that values play in experience. Working in dialogue with Husserl and other phenomenologists and related thinkers (especially Max Scheler and Nicolai Hartmann), as well as with recent commentary, I develop my own account of values as lying on the phenomenological “horizons” of experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Journey to Europe: a Synthetic History of the Role Played
    Aristotle’s Journey to Europe: A Synthetic History of the Role Played by the Islamic Empire in the Transmission of Western Educational Philosophy Sources from the Fall of Rome through the Medieval Period By Randall R. Cloud B.A., Point Loma Nazarene University, 1977 M.A., Point Loma University, 1979 M. Div., Nazarene Theological Seminary, 1982 Submitted to the: School of Education Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Program: Educational Policy and Leadership Concentration: Foundations of Education and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Committee: _______________________________________ Suzanne Rice, Chairperson _______________________________________ Ray Hiner _______________________________________ Jim Hillesheim _______________________________________ Marc Mahlios _______________________________________ Sally Roberts Dissertation Defended: November 6, 2007 The Dissertation Committee for Randall R. Cloud certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Aristotle’s Journey to Europe: A Synthetic History of the Role Played by the Islamic Empire in the Transmission of Western Educational Philosophy Sources from the Fall of Rome through the Medieval Period Dissertation Committee: _______________________________________ Suzanne Rice, Chairperson _______________________________________ Ray Hiner _______________________________________ Jim Hillesheim _______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter fece, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, b%inning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back o f the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Infonnaticn Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Aibor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 BEYOND THE FIFTH CANON: BODY RHETORIC IN ANCIENT GREECE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor o f Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By James Fredal, M.Div.; M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Logos in Aristotle's Ph
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts THE INCLUDED MIDDLE: LOGOS IN ARISTOTLE’S PHILOSOPHY A Thesis in Philosophy by Omer Orhan Aygun Copyright 2007 Omer Orhan Aygun Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2007 The thesis of Omer Orhan Aygun was reviewed and approved* by the following: John Russon Professor of Philosophy Thesis Co-Adviser Co-Chair of Committee Special Member Daniel W. Conway Professor of Philosophy Thesis Co-Adviser Co-Chair of Committee Veronique Fotí Professor of Philosophy Christopher E. Long Associate Professor of Philosophy Mark Munn Professor of History Shannon Sullivan Associate Professor of Philosophy Head of the Department of Philosophy * Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii ABSTRACT Our dissertation is a research of the various meanings of logos in Aristotle’s philosophy and the conceptual relation between them. Our method is dialectic, bringing a survey of Aristotle’s philosophy together the argumentation of our thesis. We started from the very beginning of the Aristotelian corpus, we devoted our first two chapters to Aristotle’s logic, chapters III and IV to his philosophy of nature, and our last chapters V and VI to his ethical political philosophy. Thus, we have worked on four fundamental meanings of logos respectively: “standard”, “proportion”, “reason” and “discourse”. Our thesis is the following. In its four fundamental meanings in Aristotle’s philosophy, logos each time refers back to a focal meaning: a relation between terms that preserves them together in their difference instead of collapsing one term to the other or holding them in indifference.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Aesthetics After Adorno
    The Townsend Pa P e r s i n T h e h u m a n i T i e s No. 3 Art and Aesthetics After Adorno Jay M. Bernstein Claudia Brodsky Anthony J. Cascardi Thierry de Duve Aleš Erjavec Robert Kaufman Fred Rush Art and Aesthetics After Adorno The Townsend Pa P e r s i n T h e h u m a n i T i e s No. 3 Art and Aesthetics After Adorno J. M. Bernstein Claudia Brodsky Anthony J. Cascardi Thierry de Duve Aleš Erjavec Robert Kaufman Fred Rush Published by The Townsend Center for the Humanities University of California | Berkeley Distributed by University of California Press Berkeley, Los Angeles, London | 2010 Copyright ©2010 The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-9823294-2-9 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Art and aesthetics after Adorno / J. M. Bernstein...[et al]. p. cm. — (The Townsend papers in the humanities ; no. 3) ISBN 978-0-9823294-2-9 1. Aesthetics, Modern—20th century 2. Aesthetics, Modern—21st century 3. Adorno, Theodor W., 1903–1969. Ästhetische Theorie. I. Bernstein, J. M. BH201.A78 2010 111’.850904—dc22 2010018448 Inquiries concerning proposals for the Townsend Papers in the Humanities from Berkeley faculty and Townsend Center affiliates should be addressed to The Townsend Papers, 220 Stephens Hall, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720- 2340, or by email to [email protected]. Design and typesetting: Kajun Graphics Manufactured in the United States of America Credits and acknowledgements for quoted material appear on page 180–81.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Child: Formation Through Genes, Oikos, Polis
    Binghamton University The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter 4-1995 Aristotle's Child: Formation through Genes, Oikos, Polis Daryl McGowan Tress Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, and the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Tress, Daryl McGowan, "Aristotle's Child: Formation through Genes, Oikos, Polis" (1995). The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter. 358. https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/358 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter by an authorized administrator of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Μ SJ> 1 SAGP, Spring 1995 ARISTOTLE'S CHILD; FORMATION THROUGH GENESIS. OIKOS. AND POLIS Daryl McGowan Tress Fordham University Introduction Aristotle has many different things to say about children and childhood in his writings. For example, begetting offspring is one of the basic efforts in which all animals, including human animals, are engaged. (History of Aniials (HA) 589a5; 596b21; Nichomachean Ethics (MI) 1162al8) Human children are born singly for the most part but, he notes, frequently twins are born; the most babies resulting from one birth is five which "has already been seen to happen in several cases." (HA 584b33-5) He observes that immediately after birth infants cry out and raise their hands to their mouths, but he adds that for forty days afterward they neither laugh nor cry while awake (although they might do both while asleep).
    [Show full text]
  • Aestimatio 13 (2016–2018) 187–191 188 Aestimatio
    Aristotelismo by Andrea Falcon Turin: Casa Editrice Einaudi, 2018. Pp. x + 150. ISBN 978–88–06–23112–5. Paper €18.00 Reviewed by Marilù Papandreou Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München [email protected] In Aristotelismo (Aristotelianism), Andrea Falcon traces the history of Aris- totelianism from the Hellenistic period to Late Antiquity. Right from the introduction, Falcon defines his notion of this history: it corresponds not with the history of the Peripatos but with the history of the presence of Aristotelian elements in ancient authors. For this reason, the book includes the examination not only of members of Aristotle’s school but also of authors who did not consider themselves exponents of the Aristotelian tradition or who even regarded themselves as its opponents. The book is divided into five chapters following a brief introduction onthe nature and intent of the work. Chapter 1 concerns the Hellenistic period, discussing the activity of the Peripatos as well as Epicurus and the Stoics. Chapters 2 and 3 address the post-Hellenistic age. Chapter 2 focuses on the exponents of the Peripatos (e.g., Boethus of Sidon,Xenarchus of Seleucia, Alexander of Aphrodisias), whereas chapter 3 concentrates on the presence of Aristotelian elements within the Platonic and Stoic traditions (i.e., Antiochus of Ascalon, Eudorus of Alexandria, Plutarch of Chaeronea, Alcinous, Apuleius, the pseudo-Pythagorean treatises, and Stoics such as Panaetius of Rhodes and Posidonius of Apamea). Chapter 4 deals with Late Antiquity, in particular with Porphyry, Iamblichus, and the School of Athens (e.g., Sirianus, Proclus, Damascius, and Simplicius) as well as that of Alexandria (e.g., Ammonius and John Philoponus).
    [Show full text]
  • CAQ Volume 30 Issue 2 Cover and Back Matter
    CAMBRIDGE CLASSICAL STUDIES General Editors F. M. CORNFORD, D. S. ROBERTSON, F. E. ADCOCK A Series designed for the publication of short monographs, which, too long for inclusion in journals and too short for publication alone, might otherwise never be made public. The first two of these monographs I. ZENO OF ELEA II. MODE IN A Text with Translation and Notes ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC By H. D. P. LEE By R. P. WINNINGTON-INGRAM arc now ready. 7s. 6d. net each CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Loeb Classical Library EDITED BY T. E. PAGE, en., LITT.D. E. CAPPS, PH.D., LL.D. W. H. D. ROUSE, LITT.D. Each volume. Foolscap Svo, 400-700 pages. Clear type. Cloth, Vis. net. Uother, 12*. bd. net. A series of Greek and Latin Texts, with English Translations on the opposite page. The series is to contain all that is best in Greek and Latin Literature, from the time of Homer to the end of the Western Empire. 'We ihall never be Independent of our Loeb. —TIMES LIT. Sun1. LlMt of Books to be published, April, 1936 Latin 296. Sidomus. POEMS AND LETTERS. Translated by W. B. ANDBRSON. TWO volumes. Vol.1. Greek 307. Aristotle, MINOR WORKS. Translated by W. S. HKTI. Three volumes. Vol. I. On Colours, On Things Heard, On Physiognomies, On Plants, On Marvellous Things Heard, Mechanical Problems. On Indivisible Lines, On Positions and Names of Winds. 305,306. Plutarch, MORALIA. Translated by F. C. BABBITT. Fourteen volumes. Vols. IV and V. 311. Sixtus Empiricui. Translated by R. G. BCRV. Three volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Presencing : Finding a Horizon of Mutuality and Intersubjectivity for a Democratic Political Society in Husserl’S Phenomenology
    The Missing Profiles and Co‐ Presencing : Finding a Horizon of Mutuality and Intersubjectivity for a Democratic Political Society in Husserl’s Phenomenology Author: Kondjo Brossala Diddy Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/974 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2009 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Art and Sciences Department of Philosophy The Missing Profiles and Co‐Presencing: Finding a Horizon of Mutuality and Intersubjectivity for a Democratic Political Society in Husserl’s Phenomenology A dissertation by Kondjo Brossala Diddy Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor in Philosophy April, 2009 © copyright by KONDJO BROSSALA DIDDY 2009 Table of Contents Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………… i Acknwoledgments……………………………………………………………………….. ii List of Abreviations……………………………………………………………………... iv Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Subjective Reason and the Laws of Pure Thinking ........................................ 16 1.1Natural Attitude and Phenomenological Attitude: Intentionality and the Articulation of Meaning .................................................................................................................... 17 1.2 The Reductionist views of Natural Scientism and Psychologism’s
    [Show full text]
  • Logos in Aristotle
    THE MIDDLE INCLUDED series editor John Russon REREADING ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY THE MIDDLE INCLUDED Logos in Aristotle Ömer Aygün NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PRESS • E VA N S T O N , ILLINOIS Northwestern University Press www.nupress.northwestern.edu Copyright © 2017 by Northwestern University Press. Published 2017. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data are available from the Library of Congress. Except where otherwise noted, this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. In all cases attribution should include the following information: Aygün, Ömer. The Middle Included: Logos in Aristotle. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 2017. For permissions beyond the scope of this license, visit www.nupress.northwestern.edu An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high-quality books open access for the public good. More information about the initiative and links to the open-access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Canım annemle babam Güzin ve Birol Aygün’e CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Abbreviations xi Preface xiii Introduction: The Question and the Method 3 Chapter 1: Being (Logos in the Categories) 23 1. Homonymy 23 2. Synonymy 30 3. Recapitulation and Reorientation 40 Chapter 2: Potentiality (Logos in On Interpretation) 43 1. The Inherence of Logos 43 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bachyryczdavid.Pdf
    THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATION OF TRANSCENDENTAL PHENOMENOLOGY: HUSSERL AND THE PROBLEM OF KNOWLEDGE A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy By David John Bachyrycz, B.A. Washington, D.C. December 18, 2009 Copyright 2010 by David John Bachyrycz All Rights Reserved ii THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATION OF TRANSCENDENTAL PHENOMENOLOGY: HUSSERL AND THE PROBLEM OF KNOWLEDGE David John Bachyrycz, B.A. Thesis Advisor: John B. Brough, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The goal of this dissertation is to provide an account of Edmund Husserl’s epistemology and its place within his phenomenology up through the publication of Ideas I in 1913. It represents a challenge to the view that Husserl is a Cartesian epistemologist seeking to safeguard the foundations of theoretical knowledge from the challenge of skepticism. Instead, I argue that Husserl aims to provide a transcendental clarification of knowledge understood as particular kind of intentional performance. The animating question of Husserl’s theory of knowledge is not whether the achievement of objective knowledge is possible for an experiencing subject, but how it is possible. I begin by examining Husserl’s earliest attempt at a general theory of knowledge in the First Edition Logical Investigations, which I argue should be understood in broadly Kantian terms, as a project of disclosing the conditions for possibility of knowledge by way of a phenomenological investigation of intentional consciousness. I next look at how Husserl articulates his analysis of knowledge on the basis of the cardinal phenomenological distinction between empty and fulfilled intentions.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 6.1: Introduction to Aristotle: the Categories Rorty UCSC
    Lecture 6.1: Introduction to Aristotle: The Categories Rorty UCSC Introduction to Aristotle: There are three giants of ancient philosophy: Socrates, Plato’s Socrates—surely one of the most captivating (and annoying) figures in all of literature; his admirer and student, Plato, converted to philosophy by his mentor—and the third giant, Aristotle— 384-322 BC—the son of a physician, a student in Plato’s Academy for 20 years, and the founder of a second great philosophical school, the Lyceum. Three close philosophical generations: three radically diverse approaches. Socrates, the conversationalist—wrote nothing, depicted by his student as specializing in encountering his fellow-citizens in the streets and embarrassing them by pointed questions. Plato, a dramatist-turned-chronicler used the paradoxical figure of his mentor to spin mysteries with metaphors, gradually, through the course of his writing, turning from dialectic to metaphysics and even more abstract puzzles. In Aristotle we encounter yet a different kind of mind. This man, the son of a physician, is more of a scientist than a poet. He was an inexhaustible natural scientist; legend has it that he ordered his most famous pupil, Alexander, to send him specimens of the flora and fauna he passed in his conquest of the ancient world. I’m not sure how fair it is to deny poetry to him; I say that, based only on the evidence that we have: Both men are supposed to have written dialogues AND doctrines; but in one of the paradoxes of history, the treatises of the one and the dialogues of the other have been lost.
    [Show full text]