APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B Activities Render Cancer Cells Susceptible to ATR Inhibition Remi Buisson1, Michael S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Published OnlineFirst July 11, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3389 Cancer Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology Research APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B Activities Render Cancer Cells Susceptible to ATR Inhibition Remi Buisson1, Michael S. Lawrence1,2, Cyril H. Benes1, and Lee Zou1,3 Abstract The apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic poly- ATR-mediated negative feedback loop during replication. The peptide-like APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B have emerged as key surge of abasic sites upon ATR inhibition associated with increas- mutation drivers in cancer. Here, we show that APOBEC3A and ed accumulation of single-stranded DNA, a substrate of APO- APOBEC3B activities impose a unique type of replication stress BEC3A, triggering an APOBEC3A-driven feed-forward loop that by inducing abasic sites at replication forks. In contrast to cells ultimately drove cells into replication catastrophe. In a panel of under other types of replication stress, APOBEC3A-expressing cells cancer cell lines, ATRi selectively induced replication catastrophe in were selectively sensitive to ATR inhibitors (ATRi), but not to a those harboring high APOBEC3A and/or APOBEC3B activities, variety of DNA replication inhibitors and DNA-damaging drugs. showing that APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B activities conferred In proliferating cells, APOBEC3A modestly elicited ATR but susceptibility to ATRi. Our results define an APOBEC-driven repli- not ATM. ATR inhibition in APOBEC3A-expressing cells resulted cation stress in cancer cells that may offer an opportunity for in a surge of abasic sites at replication forks, revealing an ATR-targeted therapy. Cancer Res; 77(17); 1–12. Ó2017 AACR. Introduction APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B (A3A and A3B) are members of the APOBEC family of cytosine deaminases, which convert C to Genomic instability is one of the hallmarks of cancers (1). U in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA; refs. 16–18). Although While genomic instability fuels tumorigenesis, it also offers a APOBEC proteins are important for the cellular defense vulnerability of cancer cells that can be exploited therapeutically. against foreign DNA/RNA during viral infection (19), they DNA replication stress is a major source of genomic instability are not normally expressed in unstressed proliferating cells. (2, 3). Activation of a number of oncogenes, such as MYC, RAS, When A3A and A3B are abnormally expressed in cancer cells, and cyclin E, induces replication stress (4–6). Inactivation of they become potent mutators of the genome. Expression of certain tumor suppressors involved in DNA repair, such as BRCA1 APOBEC3B is prevalent in several cancer types (17, 20–23). In- and BRCA2, also elevates replication stress in cancer cells (7–11). depth analysis of mutation signatures in cancers has implicated Recent cancer genomics studies by others and us revealed that both A3A and A3B in APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis (24). An cancer-associated mutations in the genes encoding mismatch A3AB fusion gene resulting from a deletion in the APOBEC3A- DNA repair proteins and DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE), APOBEC3B locus encodes A3A and associates with increased as well as cancer-associated expression of APOBEC3A and risk for breast and ovarian cancers, and with the APOBEC APOBEC3B, are key drivers of mutation in cancers (12, 13). mutation signature in tumors (25–29). Furthermore, A3A is Notably, the mutations inflicted by these "mutators" display a upregulated in a subset of leukemia (30). When expressed at clear association with either leading or lagging strand of DNA high levels, both A3A and A3B induce DNA double-stranded replication forks, suggesting that they act in a replication-coupled breaks (DSB), and A3A also triggers cell-cycle arrest (17, 18, manner (12, 14, 15). These new findings raise an important 31). Together, these findings show that A3A and A3B are question as to whether these mutators in cancer cells induce important drivers of mutation and genomic instability in a replication stress and, if so, whether the stress induced by them large subset of cancers, raising the question of how cancer cells can be targeted in cancer therapy. cope with these mutators during proliferation, and whether these mutators offer an opportunity for targeted therapy. Here, we show that A3A and A3B impose a unique type of replication stress by cytosine deamination at DNA replication 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Bos- forks. During DNA replication, A3A induces abasic (AP) sites in an 2 ton, Massachusetts. Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massa- UNG2-dependent manner, leading to modest ATR activation. 3 chusetts. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Inhibition of ATR in A3A-expressing cells results in a surge of AP Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. sites at replication forks, revealing a previously unknown ATR- Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research mediated feedback loop that counters A3A. The accumulation of Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/). AP sites at replication forks upon ATR inhibition increases stalling Corresponding Author: Lee Zou, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Cen- of DNA polymerases and exposure of ssDNA, a substrate of A3A. ter, Building 149-7th Floor, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129. Phone: 617-724- In the absence of ATR activity, ssDNA triggers an A3A-driven feed- 9534; Fax: 617-726-7808; E-mail: [email protected] forward loop propelling a further buildup of AP sites and ssDNA doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3389 at replication forks, which ultimately drives cells into replication Ó2017 American Association for Cancer Research. catastrophe. Interestingly, the replication stress induced by A3A www.aacrjournals.org OF1 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst July 11, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3389 Buisson et al. renders cells sensitive to ATR inhibitors (ATRi), but not to a variety Antibodies of replication inhibitors and genotoxic drugs, highlighting the The antibodies used in this study were: gH2AX mAb (Cell unique nature of A3A-induced replication stress and the distinc- Signaling Technology and EMD Millipore), APOBEC3B polyclon- tive role of ATR against this stress. In a panel of cancer cell lines, al antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Flag-M2 mAb (Sigma- ATRi rapidly induces replication catastrophe in those harboring Aldrich), CDC7 mAb (Abcam), PCNA mAb (Santa Cruz Biotech- high A3A and/or A3B activities, suggesting that the replication nology), Chk1 mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), BrdUrd mAb stress imposed by A3A and A3B may offer a promising opportu- (BD Biosciences), PCNA polyclonal antibody (Abcam), Chk2 nity for ATR-targeted therapy in a variety of cancers. pT68 polyclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), Chk1 pS317 polyclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), GAPDH Materials and Methods polyclonal antibody (EMD Millipore), UNG polyclonal antibody (Novus), RPA32 mAb (Thermo Fisher Scientific), RPA70 poly- Cell lines clonal antibody (Bethyl), APE1 mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), All cell lines were obtained from the Center for Molecular biotin polyclonal antibody (Abcam), and ATR polyclonal anti- Therapeutics (CMT) at the MGH Cancer Center (Boston, MA) body (Bethyl). from 2015 to 2016. The CMT has obtained all cell lines described here from commercial repositories (ATTC, DSMZ, ECACC, or JHSF/JCRB). Upon receipt at CMT, the cell lines Results were expanded and frozen stocks were created. Stocks were APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B activate ATR but not ATM in further authenticated as follows: To identify cross-contami- proliferating cancer cells nated or synonymous lines, a panel of SNPs was profiled for Recentstudiesbyothersandusrevealedthatthemutation each cell line (Sequenom) and a pair-wise comparison score signatures of A3A and A3B are associated with the lagging was calculated. In addition, we performed short tandem strand of DNA replication forks, suggesting that A3A and A3B repeat (STR) analysis (AmpFLSTR Identifiler, Applied Biosys- act on ssDNA during DNA replication (12, 14, 15). To tems) and matched this to an existing STR profile generated by investigate whether A3A and A3B induce replication stress, the providing repository. From authenticated frozen stocks, we analyzed the expression data of A3A and A3B in a large cells were not continuously kept in culture for more than 3 panel of cancer cell lines (Supplementary Fig. S1A). Consistent months. For the experiments described in this article, cell lines with previous studies, A3B mRNA was detected in a large were not continuously kept in culture for more than 3 fraction of cancer cell lines (17, 21). A3A mRNA was also months. All cell lines used in this study were tested for detected in a subset of the cell lines. We selected a group of mycoplasma. cell lines that express A3A and A3B mRNAs at various levels according to the microarray data and then determined the Cell culture relative levels of A3A and A3B mRNAs using qRT-PCR (Sup- U2OS-derived and SKOV3-derived cell lines expressing plementary Fig. S1B). Furthermore, we tested these cell lines in vitro APOBEC3A were generated by infecting U2OS cells with lentivirus for A3A and A3B activities using a previously described – expressing APOBEC3A under a doxycycline-inducible promoter assay (Supplementary Fig. S1C S1E; ref. 17). We measured the (pInducer20) and selected with G418 (400 mg/mL). U2OS deriv- overall A3A-A3B activity because the enzymatic