The Network of the Ismaili Castles in the Alamut Region Introduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Network of the Ismaili Castles in the Alamut Region Introduction Early Ismailis in Persia Ismailis are one of the several religious sects of Shiite Islam which originally formed after the death of Imam Jaʿfar al-Sadeq in 765. These sects owe their origin to the issue of his succession (Fig. 2). In 909 they officially established a Shiite caliphate in modern Tunisia which was named Fatimid dynasty (909 -1171).1 The Fatimids benefited from a systematic method of propaganda (daʿwa) to extend their power and rule over the Muslim communities in the other part of the Islamic world. The daʿwa organization was composed of network of missionaries who disseminated the religious and political beliefs of Ismailis within the Fatimid dominions as well as in other regions.2 By the late 11th century, the number of converts in different regions of Persia (e.g. Isfahan, Rey, Khorasan, and Transoxania) had grown as a result of the activities of several daʿi (missionaries) operating in the Persian territories. The Ismaili daʿwa was even more successful in the areas of Deylaman and Qohistan which were already the centres of socio-religious oppositions against the Saljuq government.3 The main reason for such an acceptance of the daʿwa in the Persian lands was the widespread perception of social injustices caused by the political-economic policies of the Saljuq Turks (1037 - 1194).4 All of these conditions provided a 1 Farhad Daftary, “Ismailism, Ismaili History”, in the Encyclopedia of Iranica, Vol. XIV, Fasc. 2, 2007, pp. 178- 195, available online at http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ismailism-iii-ismaili-history, accessed 11 February 2014. 2 Farhad Daftary, “Daʿi”, in the Encyclopedia of Iranica, Vol. VI, Fasc. 6, 1993, pp. 590-593, available online at http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/dai-propagandists, accessed 5 March 2014. 3 Farhad Daftary, “Hasan-e Sabbah and the origins of Nizari Ismaili movement”, in Farhad Daftary ed., Mediaeval Ismaili History and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, p. 182. 4 Farhad Daftary, The Ismailis: Their History and Doctrines, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 311. 1 good environment for the creation of revolutionary movement launched in 1090 by Hasan-e Sabbah (1050s - 1124). Rise of Hasan-e Sabbah and Nizari Ismaili movement of the Alamut period Hasan-e Sabbah officially began his mission as an Ismaili daʿis in Persia in 1081. He travelled extensively in the service of the daʿwa for nine years in many different area of Persia. During this time he was seeking an appropriate region to establish his new movement. In 1090 he obtained the control of one of the major existing castles in the north part of Iran, Alamut, and reinforced it as the headquarters of his activities against the central government. Hasan formally cut off his relationship with the Fatimid regime and the daʿwa headquarters in Cairo in 1094, and founded the autonomous Nizari Ismaili state. Nizari Ismailis gradually became an influential community in the political and intellectual history of the Islamic world. During the so called ‘Alamut period’ (approx. 1094 - 1256), the Ismailis under the leadership of Hasan-e Sabbah and his successors, succeeded in capturing, reinforcing and erecting more than 200 large and small fortresses in different regions of Persia and Syria (including Rudbar, Alamut, Taleghan, Qumes, Qohistan, Arrajan, and Jabal al-Bahra). They also stabilized their power as an autonomous state in these regions. The principal strategy which helped them to resist their enemies and survive in a hostile environment was the establishment of network of castles within inaccessible regions. The Mongol invasion in 1256, led to the fall of the Alamut region as well as the submission and destruction of most of the See also: A. E. Bertels, Nasir Khusraw and Ismailis, tr. Yaḥya Aryanpur, Tehran: Bunyad-e Farhang-e Iran, 1967, pp. 21-56. 2 Ismaili strongholds in the other territories. This event put an end to the Nizari Ismaili ‘golden age’.5 The Alamut Region and the Ismaili Castles The Alamut region is an enclosed mountainous terrain with an east-west extension in the Central Alborz Massif. To its north across the mountains lies Caspian Sea coast; southwest is the Qazvin Plain, the southeast is Taleghan region, and to the west is the area of Southern Tarom (Fig. 3). The surrounding mountains, with the average height of about 3,600 m6 on either side of the Alamut Valley, have turned the territory into an impenetrable refuge. During the Alamut period Ismailis established several strongholds in the region. The topographical features of the mountains provided an ideal place for the erection of castles, and contributed to their defensive qualities. The inaccessibility of the valley, particularly over the cold seasons when the passes fill with snow, was another factor which ensured safety for the castle dwellers during winters. According to Mustawfi (d.1349) there were more than fifty castles in the Alamut and Rudbar regions, of which Lamsar, Maymun Dez, and Alamut castle were the best (behtarin-e an).7 The recent researches on the Ismaili fortifications have identified thirty-three large and small castles, forts, and watchtowers in the Alamut region (Table 1). However, the possibility of discovering more Ismaili sites through further survey work in the area should not be overlooked. 5 See Daftari, 1990, pp. 301-402. 6 Ivanow, 1960, p. 30. 7 Hamd Allah Mustawfi Qazvini, The geographical part of the Nuzhat al-qulub, ed. Seyedmuhammad Dabirsiaqi, Qazvin: Hadis-e Emruz, 2002, p. 103. 3 It is worth mentioning that most of the Ismaili castles show evidence of significant construction phases long before the Ismailis took control of them. In these cases the Ismailis modified and strengthened the castles based on their requirements. Unfortunately, there is no explicit reference in the historical sources to the criteria employed by the Ismailis when selecting a location to establish their castles. Some vague hints do, however, exist. Regarding this issue Juvaini mentioned: Hasan [-e Sabbah] exerted every effort to capture, by conversion or assault, the places adjacent to Alamut or in its vicinity, taking such castles as he could and, further, wherever he found a suitable rock he built a castle upon it.8 This account shows that capturing and building the castles has been one of the main strategies of the Nizari Ismailis for the extension of their territories from the beginning of the ‘Alamut period’. However, Juvaini does not explain what have been the features of a ‘suitable rock (sangi miyaft ke bana ra mishayest)’ for the establishment of a castle upon it. Therefore, the best way to understand these features is the study of the existing sites and their common aspects. 8 Juvaini, 1958, pp. 673-74; see also: Daftary, 2007, p. 318. 4 The existing hypotheses regarding the network of the Ismaili castles All the previous researches on the Ismaili castles have mentioned the relationship between these castles as a network of defensive structures; however, they have never discussed it in detail. The main focus of many of these studies is on the individual castles and their architectural features. Peter Willey who carried out the most extensive research on the Ismaili castles for his book, Eagle’s Nest, Ismaili Castles in Iran and Syria, briefly discusses the strategic and tactical considerations of the ismailis in choosing a location for the establishment of a castle. Regarding the relationship between the castles as a network, he simply considers them a ‘chain’ or ‘line’ of formidable structures that defended the borders of Ismaili state. This defensive line worked in combination with geographical factors.9 A relatively similar interpretation of the network of Ismaili castle is suggested by Wolfram Kleiss in Assassin Castles in Iran. Kleiss generally discusses the area of Ismaili influence through distribution of castles in different parts of Iran. He suggests a schematic model of the relationship between the castles in different regions. According to this model Alamut castle was the political, military and religious centre of the Ismaili state. The other regions were linked to Alamut via the castles distributed in each region (Fig. 19). For example, he considers the castles of Amameh and Firuzkuh as two connections in the chain of castles towards the east, from Alamut to Khurasan; or the castle of Sava as a key connection towards the south, from Alamut to Isfahan and Fars.10 Furthermore, he mentions the possible relationship between Alamut and the Syrian castles through the sites in Azarbaijan such as Qalʿa Zahak and Qalʿa Dokhtar. Although Kliess’ model is relatively vague and needs more detail to be proved, it clearly reveals his approach to the castles as a line of connected defensive structures. Hence, at 9 Willey, 2005, p.89 and p. 95. 10 Kleiss, 1994, p. 316. 5 the end of his essay, he emphasizes a need for identification of more individual cases to fill the gap between the regions and complete this chain of castles.11 His model can be problematic even from a methodological point of view because he is looking to prove a hypothesis that is not directly supported by the evidence. Therefore, any new data can be interpreted subjectively to support a pre-determined result. A more recent model of the network of the Ismaili castles is suggested by Hamideh Choubak exclusively for those castles located in the Alamut region (Fig. 20). Choubak considers the Alamut region an integrated and well protected area with the centrality of Alamut castle as the capital (dar al-molk) of the region. According to her model, the surrounding mountains functioned as a natural rampart around the region and defined its frontiers. Furthermore, the castles are considered the ‘gates’ which protected the Alamut valley against the possible attacks through controlling the main access routes to this area.12 All of the above-mentioned studies were not able to suggest a comprehensive definition of the network of the Ismaili castles due to the lack of essential information regarding all the individual castles.