Russian 1St Cavalry Corps, 17 August 1914

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Russian 1st Cavalry Corps 17 August 1914 1st Cavalry corps was formed at close of July 1914 and covered with north development of 1st Army (Northwestern Front) of General P. Rennenkampf. At the beginning of the German operations the Northwest- ern Front was deployed in the region of Vil'kovishki - Mariampol'. Corps Staff: Lieutenant General G. Khan Nakhichevanskiy 1st Guard Cavalry Division: Division Staff Chevalier Guard Regiment: Major General Duke Dolgorukov Life-Guards Horse Regiment: Major General P.P. Skoropadskiy Life-Guards 1st Cuirassier Regiment: Major General Arsen'ev Life-Guards 2nd Cuirassier Regiment 2nd Guard Cavalry Division" Division Staff Life-Guards Horse Grenadier Regiment: Major General P.P. Grotek Life-Guards Lancer Regiment: Major General Duke S.Belosel'skiy-Belozerskiy Life-Guards Dragoon Regiment Life-Guards Hussar Regiment 2nd Cavalry Division: Division Staff 2nd Life-Dragoon Regiment 2nd Life-Lancer Regiment 2nd Life-Hussar Regiment 3rd Cavalry Division: Lieutenant General Leontovich Division Staff 3rd Dragoon Novorossijskiy Regiment 3rd Lancer Smolenskiy Regiment 3rd Hussar Elisavetgradskiy Regiment Horse Artillery Regiment: Colonel Kirpichev Regiment Staff 1 - 7th batteries General Corps total: 15000 men, 42 light horse guns, 32 machine-gun. Standard structure of a Russian cavalry regiment in 1914: Regiment Staff 1st squadron 1st platoon 2nd platoon 3rd platoon 4th platoon 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th Squadrons each had 4 platoons 1 Standard Staff of Cavalry Regiment of Russian army (not Cossacks) (1914): 1 Colonel 3 Lieutenant-Colonels 6 Captains 1 Adjutant 1 Paymaster 1 Weapons Master 24 1st and 2nd lieutenants 6 Cavalry Sergeant-majors 24 Senior NCOs 42 Junior NCOs 48 Privates First Class 720 Troopers 2 Doctors 1 Veterinary doctor 1 Military Judge 1 Priest 1 Trumpet Major 18 Trumpeters 22 Non-combatant In all: 1015 men, 876 horses. Source: Begunova A. I. Sharp Sabers and Fast Horses, Moscow, 1992. – P. 206. Copyright GFN 2001 2 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

History of the National Lancers -Long Version
HISTORY OF THE NATIONAL LANCERS 1836-2018 ! Leonid Kondratiuk Historical Services The Adjutant General’s Office Concord, MA Revised Edition 2019 During the 19th Century, most American cities had an elite cavalry troop that escorted high government officials, presidents and other visiting personages. While part of the state militia with the mission defending the state from invasion or putting down insurrection, the cavalry’s first obligation was to wear resplendent uniforms mounted on well-groomed horses. Some of these units, such as the 1st and 2d Companies, Governor’s Horse Guard of Connecticut; and First Troop, Philadelphia City Cavalry still exist. Many units such as Squadron A of New York; the Essex Troop of Newark; and the Charleston Dragoons have faded into history. Boston had several elite cavalry troops. Prior to the Revolution, the royal governor was escorted by the Governor’s Horse Guard. The unit disappeared in 1775 and reorganized in 1787 only to disband two years later. The Boston Dragoons were organized in 1802 and were joined in 1910 by the Boston Hussars, composed of Boston’s richest gentlemen. The Hussars wore elegant Napoleonic hussar uniforms which proved to be extremely costly leading to the troop’s demise in 1818. The Dragoons disbanded in 1833. For several years there was no cavalry unit in Boston. The enrolled militia, composed of all men between the ages of 18 to 45, was disbanding due to a lack of interest. In its place were companies and battalions of volunteer militia. The volunteer militia was a popular organization in American towns and cities in the first part of the 19th Century.
[Show full text]
Russian Army, 4 June 1916
Russian Army 4 June 1916 Northwest Front: Finland Garrison: XLII Corps: 106th Infantry Division 421st Tsarskoe Selo Infantry Regiment 422nd Kolpino Infantry Regiment 423rd Luga Infantry Regiment 424th Chut Infantry Regiment 107th Infantry Division 425th Kargopol Infantry Regiment 426th Posinets Infantry Regiment 427th Pudozh Infantry Regiment 428th Lodeyinpol Infantry Regiment Sveaborg Border Brigade 1st Sveaborg Border Regiment 2nd Sveaborg Border Regiment Estonia Coast Defense: 108th Infantry Division 429th Riizhsk Infantry Regiment 430th Balksy Infantry Regiment 431st Tikhvin Infantry Regiment 432nd Baldaia Infantry Regiment Revel Border Brigade 1st Revel Border Regiments 2nd Revel Border Regiments Livonia Coast Defense: I Corps 22nd Novgorod Infantry Division 85th Vyborg Infantry Regiment 86th Wilmanstrand Infantry Regiment 87th Neschlot Infantry Regiment 88th Petrov Infantry Regiment 24th Pskov Infantry Division 93rd Irkhtsk Infantry Regiment 94th Yenisei Infantry Regiment 95th Krasnoyarsk Infantry Regiment 96th Omsk Infantry Regiment III Corps 73rd Orel Infantry Division 289th Korotoyav Infantry Regiment 290th Valuiisk Infantry Regiment 291st Trubchev Infantry Regiment 292nd New Archangel Infantry Regiment 5th Rifle Division (Suwalki) 17th Rifle Regiment 18th Rifle Regiment 19th Rifle Regiment 20th Rifle Regiment V Siberian Corps 1 50th St. Petersburg Infantry Division 197th Lesnot Infantry Regiment 198th Alexander Nevsky Infantry Regiment 199th Kronstadt Infantry Regiment 200th Kronshlot Infantry Regiment 6th (Khabarovsk) Siberian
[Show full text]
National Identity and the British Common Soldier Steven Schwamenfeld
Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2007 "The Foundation of British Strength": National Identity and the British Common Soldier Steven Schwamenfeld Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE ARTS AND SCIENCES “The Foundation of British Strength:” National Identity and the British Common Soldier By Steven Schwamenfeld A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2007 The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Steven Schwamenfeld defended on Dec. 5, 2006. ___________________ Jonathan Grant Professor Directing Dissertation _____________ Patrick O’Sullivan Outside Committee Member _________________ Michael Cresswell Committee Member ________________ Edward Wynot Committee Member Approved: ___________________ Neil Jumonville, Chair History Department The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables iv Abstract v Introduction 1 I. “Thou likes the Smell of Poother” 13 II. “Our Poor Fellows” 42 III. “Hardened to my Lot” 63 IV. “…to Conciliate the Inhabitants” 92 V. Redcoats and Hessians 112 VI. The Jewel in the Crown of Thorns 135 VII. Soldiers, Settlers, Slaves and Savages 156 VIII. Conclusion 185 Appendix 193 Bibliography 199 Biographical Sketch 209 iii LIST OF
[Show full text]
Military Speak
Military Speak A glossary for Soldiers and Chiefs Soldiers have a language of their own. Some of these words and phrases are technical descriptions of aspects of the military life. Others are slang or metaphors that have found their way into everyday speech. You might be using military terms without even realising it! As you explore the displays in the Soldiers and Chiefs exhibition, you might find some unfamiliar terms. This information booklet provides definitions for a number of military words, grouped into these categories: • Kinds of Soldiers • Army Ranks • Army Weapons 1 Kinds of Soldiers This set of military terms for different kinds of soldiers will help you to become familiar with the terminology used in the exhibitions. Some of these terms are no longer used in today’s armies. Civilian a non-military person: a soldier’s life starts as a civilian Soldier a soldier serves in an army, wearing a uniform and carrying a weapon Infantry soldiers who are trained to fight on foot Civilianin the past, included such types as fusilier, grenadier and rifleman Cavalry soldiers who were trained to fight on horseback the common types of cavalry were hussar, lancer and dragoon Artilleryman a soldier with specialized training to operate artillery (cannons) a term used since the 16th century Rifleman an infantry soldier trained to use an accurate weapon (a rifle) and to operate in small groups to harass the enemy a term used since the 18th century Hussar Specialist Soldiers of the 18th and 19th Centuries Hussar (pronounced ‘who’s-are’) an elaborately
[Show full text]
HEALTH the Bad Yon Bave Always Bought GOSPEL
HEAD OF THE FRENCH NAVY. Admiral Dc La Peyrerc Is a Man Children Cry for Fleteher ’s SMALL 1A11QNS ARE PAW of Great Pluck. The French navy is under the su preme command of Admiral de la HEALTH WRITTEN TREATIES ARE OF NO Pay re re. Acknowledged both _at VALUE. home and abroad as the most dis tin guis bed officer of- the French navy, he has, both in his capacity a.s chief of the Admiralty staff and Marasmus. Guaranteed Neutrality Vanishes Marasmus is a wasting disease Minister- oh Marine,- complete y When Strong Countries Need reorganized that service, eliminat that occurs in babies, generally in The Kind You Have Always Bought, and which has been their first year. Without any 18 Strategic Pathways. ing the dead, wood, abolis dreds of almost incredible abuses, in use for over 30 years, has borne the signature of cover able cause, a child with in aras Ua and____ lmoa has Kauu been marîrt made TITï/l under OT Ilia his T>^l*w per mus not only fails to gam, but be Treaties for the preservation o- consigningçSj a . a ^ a j j-, to~ — the scrap— heap bai sonal supervision since its infancy. gins to lose weight slowly but stea peace seem in Europe to be < ! tleships and cruisers that were out L 9 || | ____ _ ^ Allow no one to deceive you in this. ily. At the same time, the bones ers of war. A striking illustration j of date, and paying particular at All Counterfeits, Imitations and 46 Just-as-good ” are but continue to grow, .
[Show full text]
Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2018
Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2018 Updated December 28, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R42738 Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2018 Summary This report lists hundreds of instances in which the United States has used its Armed Forces abroad in situations of military conflict or potential conflict or for other than normal peacetime purposes. It was compiled in part from various older lists and is intended primarily to provide a rough survey of past U.S. military ventures abroad, without reference to the magnitude of the given instance noted. The listing often contains references, especially from 1980 forward, to continuing military deployments, especially U.S. military participation in multinational operations associated with NATO or the United Nations. Most of these post-1980 instances are summaries based on presidential reports to Congress related to the War Powers Resolution. A comprehensive commentary regarding any of the instances listed is not undertaken here. The instances differ greatly in number of forces, purpose, extent of hostilities, and legal authorization. Eleven times in its history, the United States has formally declared war against foreign nations. These 11 U.S. war declarations encompassed five separate wars: the war with Great Britain declared in 1812; the war with Mexico declared in 1846; the war with Spain declared in 1898; the First World War, during which the United States declared war with Germany and with Austria-Hungary during 1917; and World War II, during which the United States declared war against Japan, Germany, and Italy in 1941, and against Bulgaria, Hungary, and Rumania in 1942.
[Show full text]
DRAFT Dress Regulations for the Royal Lancers
DRAFT Dress Regulations for The Royal Lancers Serial Order of Dress/Item Description Remarks Cap Badges and Headdress 1. Cap Badge – Beret. A metal depiction of a Death’s head backed The cap badge content is an amalgamation with two wire bullion lances crossed at their of those worn by 9/12L and QRL. The skull Officers and WO1s centre with scarlet and white pennons. A and crossbones originate from the 17th Light blue wire bullion ceremonial banner is Dragoons who were raised in 1759 following draped between the lances bearing the the death of General Wolfe in Quebec, with words ‘OR GLORY’. The cap badge sits on the Regiment's motto of a Death's Head and shaped black felt. the words 'Or Glory' chosen in commemoration of him. The Death’s Head motto was retained through the 17/21L and QRL into the RL. The crossed lances and scroll are taken from the 9/12L cap badge. Lances featured centrally on the Cap Badges of both the 9th and the 12th. The scroll originated from the 9th, originally containing the word “Lancers”. When it is worn on headdress it is referred to as a 'Motto'. When worn in the field a bronze subdued version of the Death’s head is to be worn. 2. Cap Badge – Beret. A metal depiction of a Death’s head backed with two cotton thread lances crossed at their Other Ranks centre with scarlet and white pennons. A blue cotton thread banner is draped between the lances bearing the words ‘OR GLORY’. The cap badge sits on shaped black felt.
[Show full text]
Influence of the Polish Martial Art Onto European Armies in the 18Th and 19Th Centuries – an Outline
© Idōkan Poland Association “IDO MOVEMENT FOR CULTURE. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology”, Vol. 14, no. 4 (2014), pp. 3–13 DOI: 10.14589/ido.14.4.2 HISTORY Zbigniew Sawicki Creator of Polish Martial Art Signum Polonicum Centre of Polish Martial Art Training, Signum Polonicum in Zawiercie (Poland) e-mail: [email protected] Influence of the Polish martial art onto European armies in the 18th and 19th centuries – an outline Submission: 8.05.2014; acceptance: 14.09.2014 Key words: knight, cavalry, hussars, sabre, lance, martial arts Abstract: The paper is an attempt to present the influence of the Polish martial art onto European armies of the 18th and 19th centuries. It is a specific paradox that Poland, non-existant as a state on the map of Europe, made greater impact with its military training in armies of Europe than during the period of being great and victorious. When Poland lost its independence, Polish army was incorporated into the annexation armies: Russian, Austrian and Prussian where in many cases was a source of training and knowledge on sabre and lance usage. A part of the army non-compliant with annexation joined the Napoleon’s army and countries fighting for independence and so called “Your and our freedom” where fighting valiantly was an example for other. The attitude, bravery and combat skills as well as look and gear of the Polish soldier made many western armies adopt the style, armour and martial art. Unfortunately, lack of our own state left us with no possibility of full recognition and verification of our martial art.
[Show full text]
NAPOLEON's CAVALRY by Michael Neylan 2012 the Purpose of This
NAPOLEON’S CAVALRY by Michael Neylan 2012 The purpose of this article is to provide a foundation for understanding Napoleon’s three types of cavalry. By understanding how they were each organized, equipped, and employed, it will be possible to gain a greater understanding as to how cavalry impacted Napoleon’s battles and campaigns. This article will also set the conditions to better grasp at which level of war and which type of military operation cavalry units made their greatest contribution. The Beginning In order to appreciate the impact the French cavalry had on Napoleon’s campaigns, one must first know what Napoleon had to work with and how he planned to use it. When he rose to power in 1799 as First Consul, Napoleon inherited eighty-five regiments of cavalry. While this may initially appear to be a substantial number of mounted units, his French forces did not compare to the quality of Prussian or Austrian cavalry. The eighty-five regiments were grouped into three different categories: thirty-eight light regiments, twenty medium regiments, and twenty-seven heavy regiments of cavalry, each type being employed in various manners. As Gunther Rothenberg described: “Convinced that it was not possible to fight anything but a defensive war without at least parity in cavalry, Napoleon made great efforts to turn this branch into a powerful striking force, capable of rupturing the enemy front, while retaining its ability for exploitation, pursuit and reconnaissance.” By the end of the Napoleonic era, the quality of the French cavalry would be greatly improved compared o its modest beginnings.
[Show full text]
Influence of Polish Arms, Armour and Militaria on Western Europe
Gladius XV (1980), pp. 79-86 Z.S. Lenkiewicz ISSN 0435-029X INFLUENCE OF POLISH ARMS, ARMOUR AND MILITARIA ON WESTERN EUROPE BY Z. S. LENKIEWICZ UP to approximately the 15th century the arms and the armament of a Polish knight were very similar in style to those used in the west: heavy armour, heavy sword, and heavy horse. However, in the face of the continuous attacks by Tartars, and later on Turks, on Polish terri- tories, the enemy consisting of very light cavalry, on small but very quick and manageable horses, the heavy knights were of little use. Long before the 15th century the armament and the tactics had to be slowly modified and adapted to the enemy's armament and strategems. The heavy straight sword was useless against fur hats and sheepskin covers of Tartars. The sabre as working in a more shearing way, had to be accepted. Poles now had to change over to much lighter and mobile troops. From Tartars was accepted the slightly curved sabre with short quillons and open angle pommel (Fig. 1). Such sabres were produced mainly by Armenians, craftsmen living in Polish Lwow. The dominant type of sabre came to Poland with king Stefan Batory, formerly the duke Digitalizado por InterClassica Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas http://interclassica.um.es http://gladius.revistas.csic.es Gladius XV (1980), pp. 79-86 Z.S. Lenkiewicz ISSN 0435-029X of Transylvania: a slightly curved blade, straight cross-piece of long quill- ons and very long langlets sometimes nearly reaching the pommel (Fig. 2). The same type of sabre was used in Hungary.
[Show full text]
The Management of Change
1 The Management of Change - Mechanizing the British Regular and Household Cavalry Regiments 1918 -1942 Roger Edward Salmon DMS., BA (Hons). A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2013 This work or any part thereof has not been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purposes of assessment, publication or any other purposes. Save for any express acknowledgements, references and/or biblographies cited in this work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Roger Edward Salmon to be identified as author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature………………………………………………………… Date……………………………………………………………….. 2 Abstract The mechanization of British Cavalry regiments took place between the two World Wars and on into 1942. This thesis describes the process by which horsed cavalrymen were re-trained in armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) and the experiences of some of the regiments managing this change. Extensive use has been made of the oral testimonies of many of the soldiers involved, a number of whom are still living, as well as regimental and War Office archives. The reason given for the delay in cavalry mechanization, cited in some military histories, much influenced by Sir Basil Liddell Hart, was resistance from the cavalry to parting from their horses.
[Show full text]
IABSM Army Lists for Poland for the 1939 September War
IABSM Army Lists for Poland for the 1939 September War Fully Compatible With IABSM v3 1 Introduction from Richard Clarke’s IABSM v2 Blitzkrieg theatre supplement: A nation reborn from the ashes of three great empires, Poland had a difficult birth being immediately embroiled in a war with her Soviet neighbour. Divisions in the ranks of the Red Army, combined with Polish aggression, saw them secure their borders, but relations with the Russians would forever be tainted by this bitter conflict. During the twenties and thirties the Poles found themselves limited by the agrarian nature of their economy, as such their armed forces were never able to keep pace with the technological developments of their potential foes in Germany and Russia. What is more, the success that Polish cavalry had enjoyed during the Russo-Polish War saw them elevated to a prominent position in the thoughts of their government. This undoubtedly led to a lack of investment in other branches of the services. Poland’s armoured forces were supplied with lightly armoured, under-gunned tanks and tankettes that were to prove less than effective. Her main anti-tank weapon, the Bofors 37mm anti-tank gun, was a fine weapon but Poland lacked anything like the numbers required to protect her infantry from German tanks. What is more, a shortage of automatic weapons limited the firepower of her infantry sections. That said, the one thing that Poland and her forces did not lack was courage. Fanciful stories of Polish cavalry charging German tanks have no place in serious studies of this brief campaign, but they do serve to illustrate the bravery that was attributed at the time to the Poles.
[Show full text]