Nulldfr 2016 Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Image description. Cover Image End of image description. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from about 7,500 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States. IPEDS collects institution-level data on student enrollment, graduation rates, student charges, program completions, faculty, staff, and finances. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), an online tool to aid in the college search process. For more information about IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? As suggested by the IPEDS Technical Review Panel, the figures in this report provide selected indicators for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2015-16 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. This report provides a list of pre-selected comparison group institutions and the criteria used for their selection. Additional information about these indicators and the pre- selected comparison group are provided in the Methodological Notes at the end of the report. Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data? Each institution can access previous Data Feedback Reports as far back as 2005 and customize this latest report by using a different comparison group and IPEDS variables of its choosing. To download archived reports or customize the current Data Feedback Report (DFR), please visit our web site at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Home/UseTheData. University of New Hampshire-School of Law Concord, NH University of New Hampshire-School of Law COMPARISON GROUP Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s statistics. If your institution did not define a custom comparison group for this report by July 17, NCES selected a comparison group for you. (In this case, the characteristics used to define the comparison group appears below.) The Customize Data Feedback Report functionality on the IPEDS Data Center (http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/) can be used to reproduce the figures in this report using different peer groups. Using some of your institution's characteristics, a group of comparison institutions was selected for you. The characteristics include Carnegie Classification of Special Focus Institutions--Schools of law. This comparison group includes the following 33 institutions: Albany Law School (Albany, NY) Appalachian School of Law (Grundy, VA) Arizona Summit Law School (Phoenix, AZ) Atlanta's John Marshall Law School (Atlanta, GA) Ave Maria School of Law (Naples, FL) Brooklyn Law School (Brooklyn, NY) California Western School of Law (San Diego, CA) Charleston School of Law (Charleston, SC) Charlotte School of Law (Charlotte, NC) CUNY School of Law (Long Island City, NY) Florida Coastal School of Law (Jacksonville, FL) Houston College of Law (Houston, TX) Massachusetts School of Law (Andover, MA) Michigan State University-College of Law (East Lansing, MI) Mitchell Hamline School of Law (Saint Paul, MN) New England Law-Boston (Boston, MA) New York Law School (New York, NY) Pennsylvania State University-Dickinson Law (Carlisle, PA) Roger Williams University School of Law (Bristol, RI) San Joaquin College of Law (Clovis, CA) Savannah Law School (Savannah, GA) Southern University Law Center (Baton Rouge, LA) Southwestern Law School (Los Angeles, CA) The John Marshall Law School (Chicago, IL) Thomas Jefferson School of Law (San Diego, CA) Trinity Law School (Santa Ana, CA) University of California-Hastings College of Law (San Francisco, CA) University of the District of Columbia-David A Clarke School of Law (Washington, DC) Vermont Law School (South Royalton, VT) Western Michigan University-Thomas M. Cooley Law School (Lansing, MI) Western State College of Law at Argosy University (Fullerton, CA) Widener University-Commonwealth Law School (Harrisburg, PA) Widener University-Delaware Law School (Wilmington, DE) The figures in this report have been organized and ordered into the following topic areas: 1) Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) [No charts applicable] 2) Student Enrollment Fig. 1 and 2 Pg. 3 3) Awards Fig. 3 Pg. 3 4) Charges and Net Price [No charts applicable] 5) Student Financial Aid [No charts applicable] 6) Military Benefits* [No charts applicable] 7) Retention and Graduation Rates [No charts applicable] 8) Finance Fig. 4 and 5 Pg. 4 9) Staff Fig. 6 and 7 Pg. 4 10) Libraries* [No charts applicable] *These figures only appear in customized Data Feedback Reports (DFR), which are available through Use the Data portal on the IPEDS website. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2 University of New Hampshire-School of Law Figure 1. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2015 Image description. YBar scale chart titled with Percent. 10 groups with 2 items per group. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your American institution Indian 0.01, or hoverAlaska text Native. on image. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Asian. Group Median (N=33) 1, hover text on image. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 4, hover Median text (N=33) on image. 4, hover text on image. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Black institution or African 1, hoverAmerican. text on image. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Hispanic/Latino. Group Median (N=33) 9, hover text on image. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 5, hover Median text (N=33) on image. 10, hover text on image. ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Native institution Hawaiian 0.01, or hover other textPacific on image.Islander. GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison White. Group Median (N=33) 0.01, hover text on image. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 68, hoverMedian text (N=33) on image. 57, hover text on image. ItemGroup 1, 7,Your Two institution or more races.2, hover text on image. GroupItem 2, 8, Comparison Race/ethnicity Group unknown. Median (N=33) 2, hover text on image. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 15, hoverMedian text (N=33) on image. 4, hover text on image. ItemGroup 1, 9,Your Nonresident institution alien. 6, hover text on image. GroupItem 2, 10, Comparison Women. Group Median (N=33) 1, hover text on image. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour100 institution Group 44, hoverMedian text (N=33) on image. 54, hover text on image. Race/ethnicityShape or gender line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=33) ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image90 description. Label: 80 68 70 57 60 54 50 44 Percent 40 30 20 15 9 10 10 4 4 5 4 6 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 American Indian or Asian Black or Hispanic/Latino Native Hawaiian White Two or more races Race/ethnicity Nonresident alien Women Alaska Native African American or other unknown Pacific Islander Race/ethnicity or gender Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=33) NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See "Use of Median Values for Comparison Group" for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2016, Fall Enrollment component. Figure 2. Unduplicated 12-month headcount of all students and of Figure 3. Number of degrees awarded, by level: 2014-15 undergraduate students (2014-15), total FTE enrollment (2014-15), and full- and part-time fall enrollment (Fall 2015) Image description. Image description. HorizontalEnrollment Bar measure chart with 5 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalLevel of degree Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group. GroupX scale 1, titled Unduplicated Number of headcount students. - total. GroupX scale 1, titled Doctor's Number Research/ of degrees. Scholarship. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 288. Median (N=33) 694. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=33) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Unduplicated institution 0.01.headcount - undergraduates. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Doctor's institution Professional 71. Practice. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Total FTE enrollment.Group Median (N=33) 0.01. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Doctor's Other. Group Median (N=33) 185. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 246. Median (N=33) 627. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 21. Median (N=33) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Full-time institution fall enrollment. 238. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Master's. institution 19. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Part-time fall Group enrollment. MedianEnrollment (N=33) 370. measure GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Bachelor's.Level Group Median (N=33) of 0.01. degree Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 15. Median (N=33) 132. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=33) 0.01. Shape ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Associate's. institution 0.01. line,Shape Label: Item 2, Comparison