DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Services Backlog Eradication Strategy March 2015 Reference Framework Topic Extract

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Services Backlog Eradication Strategy March 2015 Reference Framework Topic Extract Water Services Backlog Eradication Strategy March 2015 Reference Framework Topic Extract Limpopo Province Thabazimbi WSA Produced for Water Services: Planning and Information Thabazimbi WSA March 2015.pdf WATER SERVICES BACKLOG ERADICATION STRATEGY Index Chapter Title Description Page CHAPTER 1 SITUATIONAL ASSESSMENT Demographics 01.1 Water Service Levels: Total Combined Household Interventions 01.2 Water Service Levels: Backlog Solution Category - Summary 01.3A Water Service Levels: Backlog Solution Category: Class 1 01.3B Settlements having no formal water infrastructure Water Service Levels: Backlog Solution Category: Class 2 01.3C Settlements requiring extension to existing infrastructure Water Service Levels: Backlog Solution Category: Class 3 01.3D Settlements with access to infrastructure but no access to water because of functionality problems Water Service Levels: Backlog Solution Category: Class 4 01.3E Settlements with access to infrastructure but no access to water because of source problems CHAPTER 2 INTERVENTION PROGRAMMES Intervention Requirement Programmes - Summary 02.1A Intervention Requirement Program: Single Type Settlement 02.1B Individual settlement with rudimentary type solution Intervention Requirement Program: New Scheme Development 02.1C Not part of an existing scheme Intervention Requirement Program: Existing Scheme Refurbishment 02.1D Part of an existing scheme Intervention Requirement Program: Functionality 02.1E Functionality Intervention Requirement Program: Conservation & Demand Management 02.1F Conservation & Demand Management Total Projects Overview 02.2A Current Projects Overview 02.2B Future Projects Overview 02.2C CHAPTER 3 GAP ANALYSIS Unresolved Needy Settlements 03.1 CHAPTER 4 PROJECT FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK Committed Funding 04.1 WATER SERVICES BACKLOG ERADICATION STRATEGY Acknowledgements Joint Studyyy By: DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION Directorate: Planning & Information FC van Zyl (Director) S Marais (National Coordinator) Invirocon C Stopforth 083 407 4507 GPM P Du Plessis 015 297 3888 As Represented By: WATER SERVICES PLANNING RF PSP Province: Limpopo Province EVN AFRICA L Geyer 015 291 2020 MURANGO D Hovy 015 296 4438 AECOM J Kilian 015 297 0662 iNVIROMAP C Stopforth 015 296 4584 T 1 T N N R E E E DEMOGRAPHICS M M T S S P S S A E E H S S C GENERAL OVERVIEW SETTLEMENT TYPES (2013) S S 1 A A WSA = Thabazimbi LM Settlement Type Settlements Households Population L L Urban Centres: Metropolitan Area 0 0 0 A A N N Thabazimbi Urban - Formal Town 4 5,309 18,773 O O I I Northam Urban - Former Township 2 8,413 29,748 T T A A Rural - Dense Villages > 5000 0 0 0 U U T T Rural - Small Villages <= 5000 1 768 2,716 I I S S Rural Scattered 4 413 1,461 Rural Scattered Dense 0 0 0 2 WSA POPULATION DISTRIBUTION Rural Scattered Low Density 2 496 1,753 Total Population 2013: 90,305 Rural Scattered Very Low Density 1 105 372 Total Number of Households 2013: 25,579 Farming (People living on farms) 1 4,597 16,110 Average Household Size: 3.53 Urban - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) 0 0 0 Total Area: ha 1,119,983 Rural - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) 1 4,028 14,246 Population Density: people per ha 0.08 Working Towns and Service Centres - Mines, Prisons etc. 4 1,450 5,126 Unknown 0 0 0 TOTAL 20 25,579 90,305 3 STATS SA POPULATION COMPOSITION Population Group Distribution Metropolitan Area Settlements Population Group % of Total Population Urban - Formal Town Black/African 84.32 20% Coloured 0.61 Urban - Former Township 30% Indian/Asian 0.23 Rural - Dense Villages > 5000 5% White 14.45 Rural - Small Villages <= 5000 Other 0.38 Rural Scattered 5% Rural Scattered Dense 5% Rural Scattered Low Density Rural Scattered Very Low Density Farming (People living on farms) Urban - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) Rural - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) 35% Black/African Coloured Indian/Asian White Other Working Towns and Service Centres - Mines, Prisons etc. Unknown 4 SETTLEMENT TYPE DISTRIBUTION Metropolitan Area Population MAIN TYPES: URBAN / RURAL (2013) Urban - Formal Town WSA Main Type Settlements Households Population Urban - Former Township 5% Thabazimbi Rural 14 11,857 41,784 Rural - Dense Villages > 5000 16% 54% Thabazimbi Urban 6 13,722 48,521 Rural - Small Villages <= 5000 Rural Scattered Settlements Population Rural Scattered Dense Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Scattered Low Density 18% Rural Scattered Very Low Density 30% 70% 46% 54% Farming (People living on farms) Urban - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) 4% Rural - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) 3% Working Towns and Service Centres - Mines, Prisons etc. 01.1 Unknown DEMOGRAPHICS LOCALITY MAP Capricorn Vhembe Mopani Waterberg Sekhukhune Settlement Types Metropolitan Area Formal Town Former Township Lephalale Working Towns & Service Centres (Mines, Prisons etc.) Sentrum Setaria Informal Settlements Squatter Camp (Urban & Rural) Rural - Dense Village (Population > 5000) Limpopo Rural - Small Village (Population <= 5000) Waterberg Thabazimbi Kwaggaslaagte Plots Rural Scattered - Dense Modimolle - Low Density Regorogile - Very Low Density Spitskop Plots Thabazimbi Farms Thabazimbi LM Farming Ngaka Dwaalboom Modiri Molema Swartkop Smashblock Schoongezicht Amandelbult Rooiberg Bela-Bela Middeldrift Ramotshere Moiloa Amandelbult BASE MAP LEGEND Leeupoort Raphuti Thabazimbi WSA North West Swartklip Holiday Resort Leeupoort Raphuti Kromdraai Plots Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Bojanala Platinum Northam Local Municipal Boundaries Moses Kotane Settlements Local Municipality of Madibeng Moretele CHAPTER 1 SITUATIONAL ASSESSMENT 01.1 TT 1 NN R EE E WATER SERVICE LEVELS: TOTAL COMBINED HOUSEHOLD INTERVENTIONS MM T SS P SS A EE H SS C TOTAL HOUSEHOLD DIRECT BACKLOG: 1,881 SS AA LL AA LIMPOPO PROVINCE: THABAZIMBI WSA nn NN FORMAL INFORMAL oo OO ii ss ff II tt tt oo TT aa nn rr Adequate Infrastructure Needs rr Water ee ss AA ee ee ii O&M tt mm rr bb UU Resources No Services Adequate No Services aa ee oo ll TT Needs mm House Yard Shared tt II gg tt WW Stand Pipes Needs Upgrades Extensions Refurbishment uu ee SS ee Connections Connections Services NN tt SS aa HH % HH % HH % HH % HH % HH % HH % HH % HH % HH % HH % HH % CC 1 11 4,813 68 1,396 20 919 13 2 0 3 0 4 1 2,014 50 2,014 50 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 1 3,360 86 373 10 187 5 9 7 2,782 20 4,247 30 2,331 16 1,562 11 1,321 9 606 4 1,327 9 48 0 10 0 Total Household Interventions 10,955 6,016 3,250 0 1,562 1,508 606 1,327 48 0 2,014 2,014 Required This presents the Water Services Level in relation to settlement This presents the Water Services Level in relation to the need category totals category totals 1) Adequate: Formal Water Needs: Settlements Water Needs: Category Adequate: House Connections Households (2013) Households (2013) 2) Adequate: Informal Adequate: Yard Connections CHART VALUES: 2,014 7,128 48 2,014 3) Adequate: Shared Services 7% Adequate: Stand Pipes 26% (HH, %) 0% 10,955 1,327 7% 14,224 37% Adequate: Shared Services 5% 52% 4) No Services: Informal 606 2% Water Resources Needs 5) Water Resource Needs Only 1,508 O&M Needs 5% 6) O&M Needs Only Infra Needs: Upgrade 7) Infrastructure Needs Only Infra Needs: Extensions 2,014 1,562 8% 5% Infra Needs: Refurbishment 8) Infrastructure & O&M Needs 3,250 No Services 3,920 9) Infrastructure, O&M & Resource 11% 14% Needs 6,016 Adequate: Informal 21% 10) No Services No Services: Informal Water Infrastructure Infrastructure, Adequate: Resources 1 Adequate 3 5 7 Needs 9 O&M & Resource Shared Services Needs Only Needs Only O&M Adequate: No Services: Infrastructure & 2 4 6 Needs 8 10 No Services Informal Informal O&M Needs Only 01.2 WATER SERVICE LEVELS: TOTAL COMBINED HOUSEHOLD INTERVENTIONS LOCALITY MAP Capricorn Vhembe Mopani Waterberg Sekhukhune Settlement Categorisation Formal 1) Adequate Lephalale 3) Adequate: Shared Services Sentrum Supply Sentrum 5) Water Resource Needs Setaria Setaria Supply 6) O&M Needs 7) Infrastructure Needs Limpopo Waterberg 8) Infrastructure & O&M Needs Thabazimbi Kwaggaslaagte Plots Thabazimbi RWS 9) Infrastructure, O&M & Modimolle Resource Needs Regorogile Thabazimbi Spitskop Plots Farms Thabazimbi LM 10) No Services Informal Dwaalboom Supply 2) Adequate Dwaalboom Rooiberg Supply Ngaka Swartkop Supply Swartkop Modiri Molema Middeldrift Supply 4) No Services Smashblock Schoongezicht Amandelbult Rooiberg Bela-Bela Middeldrift Schoongezicht WS Ramotshere Moiloa Amandelbult Amandelbult Supply BASE MAP LEGEND Leeupoort Raphuti Supply Supply Thabazimbi WSA Kromdraai Swartklip Supply Leeupoort Raphuti Plots Supply Provincial Boundaries North West Swartklip Holiday Resort Northam RWS Leeupoort Raphuti Kromdraai Plots District Municipal Boundaries Bojanala Platinum Northam Local Municipal Boundaries Water Scheme Areas Moses Kotane Settlements Local Municipality of Madibeng Moretele CHAPTER 1 SITUATIONAL ASSESSMENT 01.2 TT 1 NN R EE E WATER SERVICE LEVELS: BACKLOG SOLUTION CATEGORY - SUMMARY MM T SS P SS A EE H SS C SS AA TOTAL NEEDY HOUSEHOLDS & POPULATION LL Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 AA NN Communities having no Communities requiring Communities with access to Communities with access to OO Total no of Total II WSA formal water infrastructure extension to existing infrastructure but no access infrastructure but no access TT Households Population infrastructure to water because of to water because of source AA UU functionality problems problems TT II SS HH Pop HH Pop HH Pop HH Pop Thabazimbi 25,579 90,305 0 0 1,327 4,513 2,160 7,638 1,231 4,185 Total Cost Required R 0 R 6,000,000 R 12,500,000 R 9,500,000 R 28,000,000 TOTAL Committed Funding (MIG & MWIG) Short Term: Year 1 (2014/15) R 2,830,000 Medium Term: Year 2 (2015/16) R 10,000,000 Long Term: Year 3 (2016/17) R 10,000,000 R 22,830,000 TOTAL % of backlog eradicated by 2015 N/A 5% 5% 5% Total Number of Households per Class Total Population per Class 1,327 4,513 28% 28% 4,185 1,231 25% 26% Class 1 Class 1 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 2,160 46% 7,638 47% Note: The information provided was based on estimations made from the settlement database backlogs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Limpopo Municipal Profiles
    NCOP PROFILE OF MUNICIPALITIES There are three forms of financial misconduct that usually lead to public institutions receiving audit outcomes that are not satisfactory and these are unauthorised expenditure, fruitless and wasteful expenditure and irregular expenditure. Unauthorised expenditure is expenditure that was incurred without having been budgeted for; Irregular expenditure is expenditure that was incurred in violation of the requirements of legislation, such as the MFMA; and Fruitless and wasteful expenditure is expenditure that was incurred in a manner which could have been avoided had reasonable care been taken. Municipality Financial 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 misconduct Modimolle- R59 888 880 R39 763 962 R19 521 858 R59 200 393 R141 408 216 Mookgophong Unauthorised R42 363 554 R20 708 225 R2 293 576 R76 343 632 R22 250 957 Irregular Fruitless & R5 129 187 R13 903 344 R28 010 002 R19 912 005 R47 533 002 Wasteful R1 099 604 Consultants Mogalakwena R47 929 088 R121 023 373 R286 527 038 R1 117 369 419 R2 845 387 113 Unauthorised R175 512 018 R487 490 102 R556 837 632 R373 685 032 R551 211 993 Irregular Fruitless & R385 320 R339 562 R597 327 R2 606 694 R11 305 709 Wasteful R54 089 284 Consultants Thabazimbi R30 815 935 R87 995 356 R32 018 831 R19 448 745 0 Unauthorised R13 231 860 R4 677 951 R1 601 978 R2 736 496 R39 495 921 Irregular Fruitless & R18 293 692 R25 414 892 R34 923 251 R10 412 593 R8 479 630 Wasteful R3 568 798 Consultants 1 WATERBERG DISTRICT THABAZIMBI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Project Name Project Project Budget Project Project end Source Local employment Location start date date of Purpose of project Youth Adult People funding Male Female Male Female with disability 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic Sedimentary Sequence Stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton
    Marine and Petroleum Geology 33 (2012) 92e116 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine and Petroleum Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpetgeo Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic sedimentary sequence stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton Adam J. Bumby a,*, Patrick G. Eriksson a, Octavian Catuneanu b, David R. Nelson c, Martin J. Rigby a,1 a Department of Geology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa b Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Canada c SIMS Laboratory, School of Natural Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia article info abstract Article history: The Kaapvaal Craton hosts a number of Precambrian sedimentary successions which were deposited Received 31 August 2010 between 3105 Ma (Dominion Group) and 1700 Ma (Waterberg Group) Although younger Precambrian Received in revised form sedimentary sequences outcrop within southern Africa, they are restricted either to the margins of the 27 September 2011 Kaapvaal Craton, or are underlain by orogenic belts off the edge of the craton. The basins considered in Accepted 30 September 2011 this work are those which host the Witwatersrand and Pongola, Ventersdorp, Transvaal and Waterberg Available online 8 October 2011 strata. Many of these basins can be considered to have formed as a response to reactivation along lineaments, which had initially formed by accretion processes during the amalgamation of the craton Keywords: Kaapvaal during the Mid-Archaean. Faulting along these lineaments controlled sedimentation either directly by Witwatersrand controlling the basin margins, or indirectly by controlling the sediment source areas. Other basins are Ventersdorp likely to be more controlled by thermal affects associated with mantle plumes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology and Technology of Metal Production in the Late Iron Age of the Southern Waterberg, Limpopo Province, South Africa
    THE ARCHAEOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY OF METAL PRODUCTION IN THE LATE IRON AGE OF THE SOUTHERN WATERBERG, LIMPOPO PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA Town Cape of UniversityFOREMAN BANDAMA Thesis Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Archaeology UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN November 2013 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University DEDICATION To our little princess, Princess Bandama Town Cape of University i | P a g e ABSTRACT The inception of metallurgy in southern Africa was relatively late, compared to other regions in Africa, and as a result, this part of the sub-continent was mistakenly thought to have been less innovative during the Iron Age. On the contrary, dedicated materials analyses are showing that starting from the terminal first millennium AD, southern Africa is replete with innovations that include the growth of state systems, specialised long-distance trading, the re-melting of glass beads, the working of ivory, and the weaving of cotton using ceramic spindle whorls. Additionally, the appearance of gold and tin production, against a background of on-going iron and copper metallurgy, has been interpreted by some as intimating innovation in metal technology. While some research energy has been invested into these novelties, there has only been incidental concern with the innovation in tin and bronze production.
    [Show full text]
  • Limpopo North West Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within The
    # # !C # # # ## ^ !C# !.!C# # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # ^ # # # # ^ # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C!C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # !C # ## # # # # # !C ^ # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # !C # # # # !C # ^ # # # # # # # ## # # #!C # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # !C# ## # # #!C # !C # # # # # # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # ## # !C # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C # # # ## # # # # !C # # # # # # # !C # # #^ # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # #^ # # # # # # !C !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C # #!C # # # # !C# # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # !C## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ !C # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # !C # !C # #!C # # # # # #!C # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C ## !C # # # !C # # ## ## # ## !C !C # !. # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # !C # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### #^ # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # ^ !C# # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # !C # # # # # # ## !C## # # !C # # ### # !C# # # # !C # # !C # # ^ # ## # # # !C# # # ^ ## !C # # # !C #!C ## # # # # # # ## # # # # # # !C## ## # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # ^ # # !C # # # # # #
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals, Prospecting and Mining in Limpopo
    PROSPECTORS AND DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA 2015 MEETING Minerals, Prospecting and Mining in Limpopo Presented By: Mr. Sam Maloka LIMPOPO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT & TOURISM (LEDET) CONTENTS 1 About LEDA 2 Limpopo Province in South Africa 3 Mineral resources in Limpopo Province 4 Key mineral production 5 Infrastructure plans in South Africa 6 Mineral beneficiation in Special Economic Zones in the Province INTRODUCING LEDA 3 100% wholly owned 4 1. Locality Map and Regional Infrastructure Magisterial Districts of Limpopo Relave to Surrounding Provinces & Countries Zimbabwe Mozambique Kruger National Park Botswana Vhembe Capricorn Mopani Waterberg Sekhukhune North-West Province Mpumalanga Province Gauteng Modified After: Wikipedia 2015 Province Magisterial Districts of Limpopo Province Municipalities of Limpopo Population of 5,404,868 District Local (2011) (census) with a Mopani Greater Giyani, Greater Letaba, currently estimated total of Greater Tzaneen, Ba-Phalaborwa 5,630,500 (2014) 4% growth Maruleng which ranks it 5th in South Africa. Vhembe Musina, Mutale, Thulamela, Makhado It has a population density Capricorn Blouberg, Aganang, Molemole, of 3/km2 (110/sq mi) which Polokwane, Lepelle-Nkumpi ranks it 5th in South Africa. Waterberg Thabazimbi, Lephalale, The density is very skewed Mookgophong, Modimolle, Bela- with intensely populated Bela, Mogalakwena areas around the major Sekhukhune Ephraim Mogale, Elias towns and cities and low Motsoaledi, Makhuduthamaga, densities in deeply rural Fetakgomo, Greater Tubatse
    [Show full text]
  • Bela-Bela SIPDM
    PUBLIC WORKS, ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE Tender No LDPWRI-ROADS/18006 3YEARS HOUSEHOLD BASED ROUTINE ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT AT BELA-BELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY IN WATERBERG DISTRICT PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT (Based on General Conditions of Contract for Construction Works (2015) 3rd Edition published by the South African Institution of Civil Engineering (GCC)) AUGUST 2018 Issued by: THE HEAD OF DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE BAG X9490 POLOKWANE 0700 Name of tenderer: . CIDB CRS numbers: . ./ . PUBLIC WORKS, ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE LDPWRI-ROADS/18006 HOUSEHOLD BASED ROUTINE ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT AT BELA- BELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Contents Number Heading THE TENDER Part T1: Tendering procedures T1.1 Tender notice and invitation to tender T1.2 Tender data Part T2: Returnable documents T2.1 List of returnable documents T2.2 Returnable schedules THE CONTRACT Part C1: Agreements and Contract data C1.1 Form of offer and acceptance C1.2 Contract data Part 1 – Data by the Employer Part 2 – Data by the Contractor C1.3 Performance Guarantee Part C2: Pricing data C2.1 Pricing assumptions C2.2 Price List Part C3: Scope of work C3 Scope of work Part C4: Site Information C4 Site Information Part C5: Annexures PUBLIC WORKS, ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE LDPWRI-ROADS/18006 HOUSEHOLD BASED ROUTINE ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT AT BELA- BELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY T1.1 Tender Notice and Invitation to Tender Tenders are hereby invited from Contractors registered with the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) having a minimum CIDB grading of 7CEor higher for the 3YEAR HOUSEHOLD ROUTINE ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT IN BELA-BELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY. Eligible contractors must have four (4) supervisors (Site Agent) with NQF level 4 in Supervision of Civil Engineering/Construction Processes and one (1) Contract Manager with NQF level 5 in the Management of Civil Engineering/Construction Processes issued only by CETA.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Statement for Thabametsi Project, 2327Cb, Vaalpensloop 313 Lq, Lephalale, Limpopo Province
    HERITAGE STATEMENT FOR THABAMETSI PROJECT, 2327CB, VAALPENSLOOP 313 LQ, LEPHALALE, LIMPOPO PROVINCE EXXARO COAL (Pty) Ltd OCTOBER 2012 _________________________________________________ Digby Wells & Associates (Pty) Ltd. Co. Reg. No. 1999/05985/07. Fern Isle, Section 10, 359 Pretoria Ave Randburg Private Bag X10046, Randburg, 2125, South Africa Tel: +27 11 789 9495, Fax: +27 11 789 9498, [email protected], www.digbywells.com _________________________________________________ Directors: AR Wilke, LF Koeslag, PD Tanner (British)*, AJ Reynolds (Chairman) (British)*, J Leaver*, GE Trusler (C.E.O) *Non-Executive _________________________________________________ p:\projects a to k\exxaro coal\exx564-thabametsi project\specialist studies\heritage\5. heritage statement & nid\2. final reviewed\exx564_herstat_sk09112012_bc_06122012.docx Heritage Statement for Thabametsi Project, 2327CB, Vaalpensloop 313 LQ, Lephalale, Limpopo Province EXX564 This document has been prepared by Digby Wells Environmental. Report Title: Heritage Statement for Thabametsi Project, 2327CB, Vaalpensloop 313 LQ, Lephalale, Limpopo Province Report type: Baseline Heritage Statement Submitted to NHRA S.38(8) Project Phase: Draft EIA Report in accordance with MPRDA Project Number: EXX564 Name Responsibility Signature Date Shahzaadee Karodia Archaeologist Specialists and Natasha Higgitt 9 November 2012 Report Writers Archaeologist Justin du Piesanie Archaeologist Johan Nel 1st Reviewer 9 November 2012 Unit Manager: CRM This report is provided solely for the purposes set out
    [Show full text]
  • Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Thermal Springs in the Waterberg Area in Limpopo Province, South Africa
    Physical and chemical characteristics of thermal springs in the Waterberg area in Limpopo Province, South Africa J Olivier1*, HJ van Niekerk1 and IJ van der Walt2 1 Department of Environmental Sciences, PO Box 392, Unisa 0003, South Africa 2 Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa Abstract The Limpopo Province in South Africa is richly endowed with thermal springs. Some have been developed for recreational, tourism or other purposes, while a number remain completely undeveloped. If the full economic potential of springs can be realised in a sustainable manner, they could make a substantial contribution to the local or even regional economy. The optimal use of a thermal spring is largely dependent upon its physical and chemical characteristics. This article focuses on the temperature and chemical features of 8 selected thermal springs located in the southern (Waterberg) region of the Limpopo Province, namely Warmbaths, Loubad, Vischgat, Die Oog, Rhemardo, Lekkerrus, Libertas and Buffelshoek. All of these springs are of meteoric origin, with water temperatures ranging from 30°C to 52°C. The mineral composition of the thermal waters reflects the geological formations found at the depth of origin. Changes in land use that occurred over the past few decades have apparently had no impact on the physical and chemical properties of the thermal spring waters. This effect may, however, become evident at a later stage due to a time lag in the migration of contaminants. The fluoride concentration of water from seven of the eight springs (all except Loubad) does not conform to domestic water quality guidelines and makes the water unfit for human consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterberg Region and Gauteng, Tshwane Map 2020
    Groblersbrug Open between 08h00 to 18h00 Tel: +27 (0)14 767 1019 Tom Burke R572 N11 Baltimore Mogalakwena River BOTSWANA Limpopo River R510 R561 Parr’s Halt / Hekpoort Border Post Open between 08h00 - 18h00 R510 Ga-Shongwane Marken R518 Masebe Lephalale Nature Reserve Tambotie D’Nyala River Lephalale River NR N11 Molalatau Lodge Moepel Ibalabala Nature Reserve Game Lodge Mogalakwena Mountain View Kransdans River Dombeya Bush Lodge Conservancy Lapalala Polokwane Motswedi Matlabas Mokolo Grootwater Camp Wilderness River River Nature Reserve N1 Polokwane Game Reserve Thiane Mokolo Dam R518 Wildlife Nature Reserve Percy Fyfe Kushke Nature Reserve NR Sanctuary Visgat Sukses R517 Waterberg R519 Limpopo R510 R33 Welgevonden African Explorer Game Park River Game Reserve Sugarloaf Private Game Lodge Rooibosbult Lebolobolo [main gate] Legends Golf Hill Game Farm 26km from Vaalwater Leobo Bergnek Private Reserve & Safari Resort Sediba Luxury Welgevonden Rooibokkraal Safari Lodge -Rock Lodge Mokopane Makapans Metsi Lodge Game Reserve Mwaritzi Jamila Game Lodge Mmadikiri Valley Mamba Fifty Seven Waterberg Majestic Game Lodge Valley River Paper Bark Lodge Vier-en-Twintig River Wild Ivory Eco Lodge Nedile Camp Wooded Peaks Lodge Riviere GR Lodge Ndlovu Tsheshepe Lodge Shambala Private Game Reserve Matlabas Nundugbane Game Lodge Sekala Lodge Jugomaro Predator Park Sentrum IBhubesi Game Lodge Thaba Meetsi Shibula Lodge Eagle Owl Lodge Zeederberg’s Okanti Lodge Motlhabatsi Clifftop Exclusive Ekhutuleni Lodge Rare Earth Spar Bokpoort Safari Hideaway Doorndraai
    [Show full text]
  • Lp Thabazimbi Magisterial District Thabazimbi.Pdf
    # # !C # ### # !C^# #!.C# # !C # # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # ## # !C ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # !C # !C # # # # # ## # # #!C# # # # # # #!C # ## ^ ## # # !C # # # # ## # # # # #!C # # # ^ !C# # # # ^ # # # # # ## # ## # # #!C # # # !C# # # ## # # # # # !C# ## # # # !C# # # !C # # # #^ # # # # # ## ## # # ## # # # !C ## ## # # # # # ##!C # # ## # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # !C## # # # # # # # # # # !C## # # ## #!C # # # ##!C# # # # ##^# # # # ## ### !C# # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # !C# # #!C #!C# ## # # ## # # # # # ^# # # # ## # # ## # # !C# ^ ## # ## # ## # # # # # ## ## # # ## ## # ## # # !C# # ## ## ## # # # # # !C# # !C # # #!C # # ## ## # # !C# # # # # ## ## # # ## # # # # ## # ## ## # ## # # # # # # # # # ### ## # ##!C # ## ## # # # # # # # ^ ## # ^!C# # # #### ## # # # # # #!C# # # ## # ## ### #!C # ## # # !C# # # ##!C## # #!C ## # ## # # !C # # ## ## # # # ## # ## # ## # # # ## # ## #!C### # # ## # # # # !C !C# # # ####!C## # # # # # #!C ## !C### !.### # ### # # # # # # # # # # # ## !C # # # # ## # ## ## ##^## # # # ## # ^ # # !C# ## # # # ## # # # # # # !C## ## ## ## # # # #### ### # ##!C#### !C# # !C# # ### # ^ # # # !C ### # # # !C# ^!C#!C## # # # !C # #!C #### ## ## #!C # ## # ### # # ## ## ## !C# ## # # # ## # # ##!C # !C # # # ## # ## # # # # # # # !.C^### #!C## ## ### # # ## # # !C # # ## ## !C#### # # # # # # ## ##!C## # # # ## ### ## # # # # # # ## # # # # # # ## ^ # # !C ## # ^ # # # !C # # ## ##^ # # # # ## #!C ^ !C# # #!C ## # # # # # # # # # # ## #!C# # !C# # # #!C #
    [Show full text]
  • Sdf Analysis
    THABAZIMBI MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK FINAL DRAFT FOR COMMENTS MARCH 2007 Compiled by: Thabazimbi Municipality Assisted by: i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE OF SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK ....................................................................... 1 1.3 PROJECT TEAM........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.4.1 PHASE 1: CURRENT REALITY ANALYSIS........................................................................................ 3 1.4.2 PHASE 2: ASSESSMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITUATION AND DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS/OPTIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4.3 PHASE 3: PROPOSALS, STANDARDS AND IMPLEMENTATION ............................................... 4 1.5 CONTENT OF THE SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK .............................................................. 4 1.6 SDF IN CONTEXT.......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eskom Chromore DWAF03 DWAF02 Gompies Revised 02 (Reduced).Pdf
    Prepared for: MOKWALE CONSULTING 76 Hans Van Rensburg Street Parklane Building Polokwane 0699 Tel 0152970030 Fax 0152975757 A PHASE I HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT (HIA) STUDY FOR ESKOM’S PROPOSED 132kV POWER LINES BETWEEN THE GOMPIES AND DWAF02 SUBSTATIONS AND BETWEEN THE CHROMORE AND DWAF03 SUBSTATIONS ON THE NORTHERN EDGES OF THE SPRINGBOK FLATS IN THE LIMPOPO PROVINCE PREPARED BY: DR JULIUS CC PISTORIUS Archaeologist & Heritage Consultant 352 Rosemary Street Lynnwood 0081 PO Box 1522 Roodekuil Bela Bela 0480 November 2012 Tel and fax 0147362115 Cell 0825545449 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Phase I Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) study as required in terms of Section 38 of the National Heritage Resources Act (No 25 of 1999) was done for Eskom’s proposed construction of 132kV power lines on the northern edges of the Springbok flats between Roedtan and Zebediela in the Limpopo Province. The construction of the proposed 132kV power lines between the Gompies and the DWAF02 Substations and between the Chromore and DWAF03 Substations is referred to as the Eskom Project whilst the footprint to be affected by the project is referred to as the Eskom Project Area. The aims with the Phase I HIA study were the following: To establish whether any of the types and ranges of heritage resources (‘national estate’) as outlined in Section 3 of the National Heritage Resources Act (No 25 of 1999) do occur in the Eskom Project Area and, if so to determine the significance of these heritage resources, and To make recommendations regarding the mitigation and management of significant heritage resources that may be affected by the Eskom Project.
    [Show full text]