<<

# 179 RAP 21 January 2018

THREAT TO Mortality of snakes due to vehicular traffic and anthropogenic impacts in Jahangirnagar University campus,

Human kill: Checkered keelback (Photo: A.K. Datta)

Mortality of , especially snakes due to vehicular impact is well understood and studied globally (Foster & Humphrey 1995; Groot & Hazebroek 1996; Trumbulak & Frissell 2000; Das et al. 2007; Row et al. 2007; Shwiff et al. 2007; Seshadri et al. 2009). Accidents with vehicles on road may affect populations of common and threatened (Dhindsa et al. 1988). But mortality of snakes due to impacts of vehicular traffic and deliberate killing by human is poorly documented in Bangladesh. Although the country has so far recorded 76 species of snakes (Hasan et al. 2014) and the list is flourishing day by day. Rahman et al. (2013) carried out a survey in Lawachara National Park and its adjacent area in Bangladesh and recorded 503 road killed snakes, belonging to 30 different species. Apart from a single opportunistic observation, (Datta 2015) reported the mortality of 18 Spectacled (Naja naja) by students and staffs in Jahangirnagar University campus, but there is no information/data available on mortality due to vehicular traffic. The present study provides evidence of the impacts of vehicular traffic

Zoo’s Print Vol. 33 | No. 1 10 # 179 REPTILE RAP 21 January 2018

and anthropogenic impacts on the snake community in the University Campus.

Study Area The study was carried out during February 2015 to November 2015 in Jahangirnagar University Campus (23052’76”N & 90016’06”E), 32km north of Dhaka in central Bangladesh. The area of the campus is approximately 280 hectares and consists of natural and artificial lakes, agricultural lands, botanical gardens in and

Monthly variation of road kills and snakes killed by humans in study area around human settlements. Originally the campus was a vast tract of ‘Sal’ (Shorea robusta) forest. The existing vegetation in this area is now of secondary character, originated from a tropical deciduous ‘sal’ forest community (Begum 2016). At present the campus supports 230 species of plants, 196 species of birds and 11 species of snakes (Hossain et al. 1995; Begum 2016; Kamrul Hasan pers.comm. June 2015). This is the country’s only residential university with 13 student dormitory and a few more are under construction to provide residential support for about 20000 students. Every day in an average more than 20 buses, hundreds of private cars, motorbikes, and rickshaws run in and out of the campus to provide transportation facility for students, academic and administrative staffs.

Methods The roads passing through University campus Road kill: Common smooth water snake (Photo: A.K. Datta)

Zoo’s Print Vol. 33 | No. 1 11 # 179 REPTILE RAP 21 January 2018

were divided into five segments (4.24km) for the convenient of study. The roads were systematically searched in early morning (06:00-08:00hrs) and late evening (05:00-07:00hrs) by walking slowly at least three

Human kill: Common wolf snake (Photo: A.K. Datta) days a week. In addition, using opportunistic sampling method, data on road kills and snakes killed by humans were also collected during incidental visits and based on the information received from other researchers, department staff and local people. The dead animals were identified up to species level, wherever possible, and removed from the road to avoid repeat count. For identification we used field guides (Daniel 2002; Hasan et. al. 2014 ). No snakes were preserved during the study period.

Results Mortality of 49 snakes belonging to 7 species was recorded during the study. Of which 53.06% (n=26) were road kills and 46.94% (n=23) were killed by humans. Snakes belonging to the families (5 species), Typhlopidae (1 species) and Elapidae (1 species) were recorded. In case of road kills, individuals of the species Common smooth water snake

Table 1: Number of road kills and Human kills, family of the snake, common name and their scientific names

Family Common Name Scientific Name Frequency (n) Raod kills Human Kills Typhlopidae Diard’s blind snake Typhlops diardii 0 2 Striped keelback Amphiesma stolata 1 6

Checkered keelback piscator 6 1

Common smooth water snake Enhydris enhydris 18 5 Colubridae Common wolf snake Lycodon aulicus 1 5

Indian rat snake Ptyas mucosa 0 1

Elapidae Spectacled cobra Naja naja 0 3

Total 26 23

Zoo’s Print Vol. 33 | No. 1 12 # 179 REPTILE RAP 21 January 2018

(Enhydris enhydris) were more frequently encountered (n=18) followed by Checkered keelback (Xenochrophis piscator) (n=6). Whilst in case of human killed, six individual of Striped keelback and five individuals of each Common wolf snake (Lycodon aulicus) and Common smooth water snake (Enhydris enhydris) were accounted. Monthly variation was observed for both road kill and snakes killed by humans. Highest impact of vehicular traffic was observed during June (n=7) followed by May (n=4), February April and July (n=3) respectively. Snakes that were killed by humans were found highest during the month of July (n=6) followed by April and September Human kill: Common blind snake (Photo: A.K. Datta) (n=5), March (n=4), May (n=3). No snakes were killed by humans during February, June, August, October and November. November is the only month when no mortality of snakes was observed by both incidents.

Discussion Out of 7 species recorded in the campus, we found 4 species of snakes are due to road kills. It is worth mentioning although Common smooth water snake (Enhydris enhydris) and Checkered keelback (Xenochrophis piscator) both are water snakes but were found mostly as road kills. About 18 road kill Common smooth water snake (Enhydris enhydris) and 6 Checkered keelback (Xenochrophis piscator) were found. A study conducted by Das et al. (2007) at Kaziranga National Park, , observed very few water snakes as road kill. Another study on road mortalities of snakes in Mudumalai (Gokula 1997) shows that out of seven species of snakes, the Common vine snake (Ahaetulla nasutus) was the most affected (12 out of 23 snake road kills). Common smooth water snake (Enhydris enhydris) is the only mildly venomous snake species found as road kill and the rest were completely non venomous. In a study Andrews & Gibbons (2005) found that venomous snakes crossing the road were more than non-venomous snakes. But here we found opposite scenario. All the 7 snake species (total of 23) that were killed by campus dwellers are protected by Bangladesh Wildlife Act 2012 and killing of any such species is a punishable

Zoo’s Print Vol. 33 | No. 1 13 # 179 REPTILE RAP 21 January 2018

offense. Datta (2015) reported killing of 18 Spectacled cobra Naja( naja) from a student dormitory of this university campus. This present findings justifies that such incidents of snake mortality is very common here. Students and staffs of this university campus may not be aware about country’s Wildlife Act. A detailed and long term study is needed to measure the anthropogenic impact and vehicular traffic on snakes as well as other species.

References Andrews, K.M. & J.W. Gibbons (2005). How do highways influence snake movement? Behavioral responses to roads and vehicles. Copeia 2005: 772-782. Begum, S. (2016). Birds of Jahangirnagar University Campus. Arannayak Foundation. Bangladesh. 96pp. Daniel, J.C. (2002). The book of Indian and . Bombay Natural History Society/Oxford University Press, Mumbai, Delhi, Calcutta and Chennai. Viii + 238 pp. Das, A., M.F. Ahmed, B.P. Lahkar & P. Sharma (2007). A pre­liminary report of reptilian mortality on road due to vehicular movement near Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. Zoos’ Print Journal 22(7): 2742–2744. Datta, A.K. (2015). Some incidents of Spectacled cobra (Naja naja) death at Jahangirnagar University campus, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Reptile Rap. No. 17, 27 July.48-49pp Dhindsa, M.S., J.S. Sandhu, P.S. Sandhu & H.S. Toor (1988). Road side birds in Punjab (India): relation to mortality from vehicles. Environmental Conservation 15:3030-310. Foster, M.L. & S.R. Humphrey (1995). Use of highway under­passes by Florida Panthers and other Wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23(1): 95-100. Gokula, V. (1997). Impact of vehicular traffic on snakes in Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary. Cobra 27: 26. Groot, B.G.W.T.A. & E. Hazebrock (1996). Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe.Conserv. Biol. 10: 1059-1067. Hasan, M.K., M.M.H. Khan & M.M.F. Feeroz (2014). Amphibians and Reptiles of Bangladesh – A Field Guide. Arannayk Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 191pp. Hossain, A.B.M.E., S.A. Khan & M.A. Islam (1995). An inventory of plant diversity in relation to ecology and environment of Jahangirnagar University, Vol. 1. Vegetational composition and their taxonomic identity, Bangladesh J. Life Sci. 7(1&2): 95-108. Rahman, S.C., S.M.A. Rashid, K. Das, C. Jenkins & L. Luiselli (2013). Monsoon does matter: annual activity patterns in a snake assemblage from Bangladesh. Herpetological Journal 23: 203–208. Row, J.R., G. Blouin-Demers & P.J. Wheatherhead (2007). Demographic effect of road mortality in black rat snakes (Elaphe obsolete). Biological Conservation 137: 117-124. Seshadri, K.S., A. Yadev & K.V. Gururaja (2009). Road kills of amphibians in different land use areas from Sharavathi river basin, central Western Ghats India. J. Threatened Taxa, 1(11): 549-552. Shwiff, S.A., H.T. Smith, R.M. Engeman, R.M. Barry, R.J. Rossmanith & M. Nelson (2007). Bioeconomic analysis of herpetofauna raod-kills in a Florida State Park. Ecological Economics 64: 181-85. Trombulak, S.C. & C.A. Frissell (2000). Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14, 18-30.

Ashis Kumar Datta1, Md. Kamrul Hasan2 & Mohammed Mostafa Feeroz3

1Research Associate, Wildlife Biology Branch, 2Associate Professor & 3Professor, Department of Zoology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Email: [email protected] (Corresponding author)

Citation: Datta, A.K., M.K. Hasan & M.M. Feeroz (2018). Threats to Snakes: Mortality of snakes due to vehicular traffic and anthropogenic impacts in Jahangirnagar University campus, Bangladesh. Reptile Rap#179. In: Zoo’s Print 33(1): 10-14

Zoo’s Print Vol. 33 | No. 1 14