Using Demographic Data to Better Interpret Pitfall Trap Catches
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Ground Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Southeastern Altai R
ISSN 0013-8738, Entomological Review, 2010, Vol. 90, No. 8, pp. ???–???. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2010. Original Russian Text © R.Yu. Dudko, A.V. Matalin, D.N. Fedorenko, 2010, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2010, Vol. 89, No. 11, pp. 1312–1330. The Ground Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Southeastern Altai R. Yu. Dudkoa, A. V. Matalinb, and D. N. Fedorenkoc aInstitute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630091 Russia bMoscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, 129243 Russia e-mail: [email protected] cInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119071 Russia Received October 1, 2009 Abstract—Long-term studies of the ground beetle fauna of Southeastern Altai (SEA) revealed 33 genera and 185 species; 3 and 15 species are reported for the first time from Russia and SEA, respectively. The following gen- era are the most diverse: Bembidion (47 species), Amara and Harpalus (21 each), Pterostichus (14), and Nebria (13). The subarid (35%) and boreal (32%) species prevail in the arealogical spectrum, while the mountain endem- ics comprise 13% of the fauna. The carabid fauna of SEA is heterogeneous in composition and differs significantly from that of the Western and Central Altai. The boreal mountain component mostly comprises tundra species with circum-boreal or circum-arctic ranges, while the subarid component (typical Mongolian together with Ancient Mediterranean species) forms more than one-half of the species diversity in the mountain basins. The species diver- sity increases from the nival mountain belt (15 species, predominantly Altai-Sayan endemics) to moss-lichen tun- dras (40, mostly boreal, species). -
The Ground Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Southeastern Altai R
ISSN 0013-8738, Entomological Review, 2010, Vol. 90, No. 8, pp. 968–988. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2010. Original Russian Text © R.Yu. Dudko, A.V. Matalin, D.N. Fedorenko, 2010, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2010, Vol. 89, No. 11, pp. 1312–1330. The Ground Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Southeastern Altai R. Yu. Dudkoa, A. V. Matalinb, and D. N. Fedorenkoc aInstitute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630091 Russia bMoscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, 129243 Russia e-mail: [email protected] cInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119071 Russia Received October 1, 2009 Abstract—Long-term studies of the ground beetle fauna of Southeastern Altai (SEA) revealed 33 genera and 185 species; 3 and 15 species are reported for the first time from Russia and SEA, respectively. The following gen- era are the most diverse: Bembidion (47 species), Amara and Harpalus (21 each), Pterostichus (14), and Nebria (13). The subarid (35%) and boreal (32%) species prevail in the arealogical spectrum, while the mountain endem- ics comprise 13% of the fauna. The carabid fauna of SEA is heterogeneous in composition and differs significantly from that of the Western and Central Altai. The boreal mountain component mostly comprises tundra species with circum-boreal or circum-arctic ranges, while the subarid component (typical Mongolian together with Ancient Mediterranean species) forms more than one-half of the species diversity in the mountain basins. The species diver- sity increases from the nival mountain belt (15 species, predominantly Altai-Sayan endemics) to moss-lichen tun- dras (40, mostly boreal, species). -
New Data on Lithuanian Beetle (Coleoptera) Fauna
NAUJOS IR RETOS LIETUVOS VABZDŽIŲ RŪŠYS. 20 tomas 29 NEW DATA ON LITHUANIAN BEETLE (COLEOPTERA) FAUNA VYTAUTAS TAMUTIS1, ROMAS FERENCA2, POVILAS IVINSKIS3, JOLANTA RIMŠAITĖ3, ALEKSANDRAS MERŽIJEVSKIS3 1Lithuanian University of Agriculture, Studentų 11, Akademija, Kaunas distr., LT-53361, Lithuania. E-mail: [email protected] 2Kaunas T. Ivanauskas Zoological Museum, Laisvės al. 106, LT-44253 Kaunas, Lithuania. E-mail:[email protected] 3Institute of Ecology of Vilnius University, Akademijos 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania. E-mail:[email protected] Introduction The most important information on Lithuanian Coleoptera was summarized and published in the monograph „Lietuvos fauna. Vabalai“ (Pileckis & Monsevičius, 1995, 1997). This monograph presents the list of more then 2850 Coleoptera species. However, the latest records (Barševskis, 2001; Ferenca, 2003, 2004; Ferenca et al., 2002, 2006, 2007; Inokaitis, 2004; Monsevičius & Pankevičius, 2001; Šablevičius, 2003, 2004; Šablevičius & Ferenca, 1995; Tamutis, 1996, 2001a, 2001b, 2003, 2004; Tamutis & Ferenca, 2006) contain information on more than 450 species of Lithuanian Coleoptera. This paper presents information on 24 new Coleoptera species for Lithuania. Two species (Chlaenius spoliatus and Harpalus melancholicus) should be removed from the list of Lithuanian Coleoptera, as misidentified. Material and Methods The present data based on the material collected by the authors of this report during field research. Some of the material was deposited in the collection of Kaunas T. Ivanauskas Zoological Museum and personal collections of Lithuanian coleopterologists. The biggest part of species was collected by the authors: Vytautas Tamutis (V. T.), Romas Ferenca (R. F.), Povilas Ivinskis (P. I.) and Jolanta Rimšaitė (J. R.). Some specimens were collected by Teisutis Ašmenavičius (T. -
Introduction Results and Discussion
Assessing the conservation status of the lower Una river basin using records of Adephagan Coleoptera Lucija Šerić Jelaska1, Martina Temunović2,3 1 Group for Systematic Zoology and Entomology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] 2 Association for Biological Research - BIOM, Sestinski dol 12, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] 3 Department of Forest Genetics, Dendrology and Botany, Faculty of Forestry, University of Zagreb, Svetosimunska 25, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia Hydradephaga fam. Noteridae Geadephaga fam. Carabidae of Noterus clavicornis (De Geer, 1774) Abax carinatus (Duftschmid 1812) Abax paralellus (Duftschmid 1812) Introduction fam. Dytiscidae Amara aenea DeGeer, 1774 Hyphydrus anatolicus Guignot, 1957 Anchomenus dorsalis (Pontoppidan 1763) Hydroglyphus geminus Fabricius, 1792 Anysodactylus signatus (Panzer 1797) Hygrotus (Coelambus) impressopunctatus Schaller, 1783 Carabid and Hydradephagan water beetles possess a range of characteristics Asaphidion cyanicorne Pandelle 1867 Suphrodytes dorsalis Fabricius, 1787 Badister bullatus (Schrank 1798) usable for the evaluation of the conservation status of wetland habitats as Hydroporus palustris Linnaeus, 1761 Bembidion velox (Linnaeus 1761) Laccophilus hyalinus DeGeer, 1774 they have a strong role as environmental indicators. Brachinus crepitans (Linnaeus 1758) Hydroporus angustatus Sturm, 1835 Brachinus psophia Audinet-Serville 1821 Hydrporus rufifrons O.F. Müller, 1776 Carabus cancellatus Illiger 1798 Hydroporus planus Fabricius, 1781 The aim of the research was to estimate the conservation value of the lower Carabus coriaceus Linnaeus 1758 Laccophilus minutus Linnaeus, 1758 Carabus granulatus Linnaeus 1758 course of the Una river, where it forms the border between Croatia and Bos- Laccophilus poecilus Klug, 1834 Carabus ullrichi Germar 1824 Liopterus haemorrhoidalis Fabricius, 1787 nia and Herzegovina. -
Coleoptera) in Poland
http://rcin.org.pl POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK INSTITUT ZOOLOGII FRAGMENTA FAUNISTlCA Tom 30 Warszawa, 1987. 03. 31 Nr 17 Andrzej L e ś n ia k Zoogeographical analysis of the Carabidae ( Coleopłera) of Poland *; ■ , . (With one map in the text) Abstract. Presented paper is a proposal of a classification of the carabid beetles occurring in Poland to the following zoogeographical elements: Holarctic, Palaearctic, Euroarctic, Euro-Siberian, Euro-Central Asiatic, Euro-Mediterranean and element of the European Forest Province. Biogeography as a science dealing with the problem of distribution of organism communities has developed over last three decades. It is an integration of both animal and plant geography into a unified special branch. This junction seems to be especially reasonable since, so far, any consideration about particu lar distribution of animals resulted with an observation of their dependence on the specific vegetation. Recently biogeography has been developing in mamy countries, particularly in the Soviet Union and the USA with both theoretical and utilitarian aspects. The following ends were put to be fulfilled by this knowledge (Teoret. i prikl. aspekty biogeografii, 1982): — explanation of performance and energy balances of ecosystems, — bioindication of elements of landscape (among others for the classifica tion purposes), — forecasting of trends in community transformations influenced by na tural and anthropogenic factors. According to O b m iń s k i (1974) zoocenosis is a formation which does not exist independently. It is only a “formal unit” built up by researchers, being in fact an integrated part of biocenosis. This opinion had been supported, indepen dently fromO b m iń s k i, by S t u g r e n (1975), who established much closer c o n - http://rcin.org.pl 298 A. -
Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and Corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017)
Invertebrate Zoology, 2019, 16(3): 283–304 © INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY, 2019 Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017) Yu.N. Sundukov1, K.V. Makarov2 1 Federal Scientific Center of East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 100-letiya Vladivostoka av. 159, Vladivostok, 690022 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Zoology and Ecology Department, Moscow Pedagogical State University, Kibalchicha Street 6, Bld. 5, Moscow 129164 Russia.E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: An analyis of all available information on the ground beetles of the Russian Far East published in the 2nd edition of the first volume of the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera is presented. A total of 155 Far Eastern taxa of Carabidae is included, for which 178 changes are given: 108 of them concern distribution data, while 70 require taxonomic corrections. Another 8 omitted Far Eastern taxa are added to the catalogue; 31 and 19 taxa are included in or excluded from the fauna of the Far East, respectively; the distribution information is either restricted or expanded for 46 taxa. The total number of species-rank taxa in the fauna of the Far East is increased from 761 to 781. How to cite this article: Sundukov Yu.N., Makarov K.V. 2019. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017) // Invert. Zool. Vol.16. No.3. P.283–304. doi: 10.15298/invertzool.16.3.07 KEY WORDS: Taxonomic list; omitted taxa; distribution; added taxa; excluded taxa; taxonomic refinements; regional biodiversity. -
Using Demographic Data to Better Interpret Pitfall Trap Catches 223 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.100.1530 Research Article
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 100: 223–254 (2011)Using demographic data to better interpret pitfall trap catches 223 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.100.1530 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Using demographic data to better interpret pitfall trap catches Andrey V. Matalin, Kirill V. Makarov Zoology & Ecology Department, Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia Corresponding author: Andrey V. Matalin ([email protected]) Academic editor: D.J. Kotze | Received 2 December 2009 | Accepted 18 June 2010 | Published 20 May 2011 Citation: Matalin AV, Makarov KV (2011) Using demographic data to better interpret pitfall trap catches. In: Kotze DJ, Assmann T, Noordijk J, Turin H, Vermeulen R (Eds) Carabid Beetles as Bioindicators: Biogeographical, Ecological and Environmental Studies. ZooKeys 100: 223–254. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.100.1530 Abstract The results of pitfall trapping are often interpreted as abundance in a particular habitat. At the same time, there are numerous cases of almost unrealistically high catches of ground beetles in seemingly unsuitable sites. The correlation of catches by pitfall trapping with the true distribution and abundance of Carabidae needs corroboration. During a full year survey in 2006/07 in the Lake Elton region (Volgograd Area, Rus- sia), 175 species of ground beetles were trapped. Considering the differences in demographic structure of the local populations, and not their abundances, three groups of species were recognized: residents, migrants and sporadic. In residents, the demographic structure of local populations is complete, and their habitats can be considered “residential”. -
Hradec Králové: Protecting Na Plachtě Nature Monument from Development a Case Study on the Importance of Public Participation in Environmental Protection
Envigogika: Charles University E-journal for Environmental Education ISSN 1802-3061 Hradec Králové: Protecting Na Plachtě nature monument from development A case study on the importance of public participation in environmental protection Vendula Zahumenská Envigogika 10 (1) – Reviewed papers/Recenzované články Published/ Publikováno 10. 6. 2015 DOI: 10.14712/18023061.482 Abstract Na Plachtě is located at the south-eastern edge of Hradec Králové where over the past 20 years conflicts of interests between environmentalists and local developers have arisen concerning the development and commercial use of the site. This case study is con- cerned with the importance of public participation in environmental issues and describes the specific opportunities for influencing environmental decision-making. The author refers to specific events which eventually resulted in the declaration of the Na Plachtě site as a “natural monument”; she also investigates opportunities for changing the landscape plan which would strengthen protection against any construction on the site. Other possibilities for influencing decision-making about issues of concern to the general public, and which have an impact on the work of regional representatives are also discussed. Key words Nature protection, public participation, local actors, landscape planning. Abstrakt Lokalita Na Plachtě je ekosystém na okraji krajského města Hradec Králové, kde v průběhu posledních 20 let vznikl konflikt zájmů mezi environmentalisty a místními deve- lopery ohledně rozvoje a komerčního využití místa. Tato případová studie je zaměřena na otázku významu účasti veřejnosti při ochraně životního prostředí a na popis konkrétních možností ovlivnění kauzy dotýkající se environmentálních otázek. Studie se věnuje popisu jednotlivých událostí, které vedly až k vyhlášení lokality Na Plachtě za přírodní památku, a podrobně zkoumá především možnost změny územního plánu, která by podstatně zvýšila ochranu dané lokality před zastavěním. -
Mestrado Em Biologia Da Conservaç˜Ao
Universidade de Evora´ - Escola de Ciˆencias e Tecnologia Mestrado em Biologia da Conserva¸c˜ao Disserta¸c˜ao Influˆencia do empreendimento de Alqueva na comunidade de carab´ıdeos (Coleoptera:Carabidae) presentes nas ´areas emergentes (ilhas) Jo˜aoPedro Atan´asioGrenho Orientador(es) Diogo Figueiredo | Rui Jorge Cegonho Raimundo Evora´ 2020 Universidade de Evora´ - Escola de Ciˆencias e Tecnologia Mestrado em Biologia da Conserva¸c˜ao Disserta¸c˜ao Influˆencia do empreendimento de Alqueva na comunidade de carab´ıdeos (Coleoptera:Carabidae) presentes nas ´areas emergentes (ilhas) Jo˜aoPedro Atan´asioGrenho Orientador(es) Diogo Figueiredo | Rui Jorge Cegonho Raimundo Evora´ 2020 Adisserta¸c˜aofoiobjetodeaprecia¸c˜aoediscuss˜aop´ublicapeloseguintej´urinomeadopeloDiretor da Escola de Ciˆenciase Tecnologia: Presidente Jo˜aoEduardo Raba¸ca(Universidade de Evora)´ • | Vogal Am´alia Maria Marques Espirid˜ao de Oliveira (Universidade de Evora)´ • | Vogal-orientador Diogo Figueiredo (Universidade de Evora)´ • | Evora´ 2020 UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA ESCOLA DE CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA INFLUÊNCIA DO EMPREENDIMENTO DE ALQUEVA NA COMUNIDADE DE CARABÍDEOS (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) PRESENTE NAS ÁREAS EMERGENTES (ILHAS) João Pedro Atanásio Grenho Orientadores: Professor Catedrático Diogo Francisco Caeiro Figueiredo Doutor Rui Jorge Cegonho Raimundo Mestrado em Biologia da Conservação Área de especialização: Entomologia Dissertação de Tese Évora, fevereiro de 2019 Esta dissertação não inclui as críticas e as sugestões feitas pelo júri ESCOLA -
The Vjosa-Floodplains in Albania As Natural Habitat for Ground Beetles: a Hotspot of Rare and Stenotopic Species (Coleoptera: Carabidae) 269-306 © Zool.-Bot
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien. Frueher: Verh.des Zoologisch-Botanischen Vereins in Wien. seit 2014 "Acta ZooBot Austria" Jahr/Year: 2018 Band/Volume: 155_1 Autor(en)/Author(s): Paill Wolfgang, Gunczy Johanna, Hristovski Slavcho Artikel/Article: The Vjosa-floodplains in Albania as natural habitat for ground beetles: a hotspot of rare and stenotopic species (Coleoptera: Carabidae) 269-306 © Zool.-Bot. Ges. Österreich, Austria; download unter www.zobodat.at Acta ZooBot Austria 155, 2018, 269–306 The Vjosa-floodplains in Albania as natural habitat for ground beetles: a hotspot of rare and stenotopic species (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Wolfgang Paill, Johanna Gunczy & Slavčo Hristovski The ground beetle fauna of the Vjosa floodplains in Albania near Kutë and Poçem was studied in the spring of 2017 over a period of five days. 112 species were documented on the basis of 2.327 captured individuals. Three species (Dyschirius abditus (Fedorenko, 1993), Demetrias imperialis (Germar, 1823) and Microlestes fulvibasis (Reitter, 1901)) were reported for the first time for Albania, three others Cylindera( germanica muel- leri (Magistretti, 1966), Cylindera arenaria viennensis (Schrank, 1781) and Thalas- sophilus longicornis (Sturm, 1825)) were documented for the first time with detailed and trusted data for this country. Several other taxa were found for the second time or were rediscovered after many years. From other parts of the Vjosa valley, two further new or unequivocally documented species for Albania, Cylindera germanica germanica (Linnaeus, 1758) and Parazuphium chevrolatii (Laporte, 1833) were reported. Within the study area near Kutë, the highest numbers of carabid species and specimens were caught on silty and moist sediment bars with initial to pioneer vegetation situated either directly along the main channel of the Vjosa or in drying, regularly flooded side arms. -
The Modeling and Forecasting of Carabid Beetle Distribution in Northwestern China
insects Article The Modeling and Forecasting of Carabid Beetle Distribution in Northwestern China Xueqin Liu 1, Hui Wang 2, Dahan He 1, Xinpu Wang 1,* and Ming Bai 1,3,* 1 School of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China; [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (D.H.) 2 Institute of Green Manure, Yan’an Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yan’an 716000, China; [email protected] 3 Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (X.W.); [email protected] (M.B.) Simple Summary: The relationship between species and environment are an important basis for the study of biodiversity. Most researchers have found the distribution of indicator insects such as carabid beetle at the local community scale; however, a few studies on the distribution of indicator insects in grassland in China. Here, we used Generalized Additive Models (GAM) to predict temperate steppe of northwestern China carabid beetle species richness distribution, and to determine the possible underlying causal factors. Predicted values of beetle richness ranged from 3 to 12. The diversity hotspots are located in the southwest, south and southeast of the study area which have moist environment, the carabid beetle is mainly influenced by temperature and precipitation. The results underline the importance of management and conservation strategies for grassland and also provides evidence for assessing beetle diversity in temperature steppe. Abstract: Beetles are key insect species in global biodiversity and play a significant role in steppe ecosystems. In the temperate steppe of China, the increasing degeneration of the grasslands threatens beetle species and their habitat. -
Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes: an Ecological Opportunity for Coal Mining Subsidence Areas - 4283
Zhang et al.: Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: an ecological opportunity for coal mining subsidence areas - 4283 - BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES: AN ECOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY FOR COAL MINING SUBSIDENCE AREAS ZHANG, G. X.1,2,3 – YUAN, X. Z.1,2,3* – WANG, K. H.1,2,3 – ZHANG, M. J.1,2,3 – ZHOU, L. L.1,2,3 – ZHANG, Q. Y.1 – HU, Y. X.2 1State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing, China 2Faculty of Architecture and Urban planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China 3Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region’s Eco-Environment, Chongqing, China *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +86-138-9603-9266 (Received 3rd Dec 2019; accepted 6th May 2020) Abstract. Rapid population growth and economic development increase energy and grain demands. However, in the high-groundwater coal basins where coal seams and agricultural production overlap, mining subsidence destroys much arable land, causing a series of environmental and social issues. This study investigated plants, beetles, spiders and birds in typical intensive farmlands and farmlands containing mining subsidence mosaics (i.e., mosaic farmlands) in North China. The species composition of these four taxonomic groups differed significantly between the intensive farmlands and mosaic farmlands, with 271 plant, 17 spider, 49 beetle and 138 bird species in the mosaic farmlands and 76, 12, 35 and 30 such species in the intensive farmlands, respectively. The mosaic farmlands hosted more and different species than the intensive farmlands. Additionally, these four taxonomic groups, especially plants and birds, showed a higher abundance and diversity in mosaic farmlands than in intensive ones.