Download This PDF File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download This PDF File Journal of Management and Information Science Corresponding Author. H.Murat Sonmez,Vol.5, No. 1 Journal of Management and Information Science Comprehensive Overview of the Crimea Problem in the Second Anniversary of the Annexation of “Green Island” Report H.Murat Sonmez* *Ph.D., Turkish War Colleges Command, Yenilevent-34330, İstanbul, Turkey. Tel: +90 212 398-0100, e-mail:[email protected]. Abstract- Crimea hosted princes and trained sultans for the rulers within the historical process and Crimea is an island which experienced wars of power and exiles. After the XVIIIth century, especially after the World War II, Demographic structure of the Crimea has been changed with exiles; mostly Russians and Ukrainians filled the places which were vacated by the Crimean Tatars. Peninsula which was presented to the Ukraine by the Khrushchev, sixty years ago without asking to the Crimea, “genetically modified” Crimea was recaptured by Putin with the so-called referendum. Within the process which led to the “Crimea Referendum” that is questioned in terms of legitimacy pursuant to national and international laws, Russia used “Green Men” to invade the Crimea which was formerly named as “Green Island”. Russia realized the enlargement of its soils for the first time after the Cold War with the hybrid warfare instead of conventional warfare. Russia made quite big acquisition with the outcome it achieved from the hybrid warfare which was conducted in a cost-effective manner and with less casualties, which cannot be compared with the conventional warfare. This article which examines the struggle of Crimean Tatars and reaction of West against this process and Russia, also events of Crimea at the second anniversary of the annexation of Crimea, constitutes a significance especially in terms of how the political outcomes of the hybrid warfare are effective especially on Crimea. Keywords- Crimea, Crimean Tatars, Russia, Ukraine, Green Island, Annexation. 1. Introduction Island” by the Crimean Tatars and it means “My Peak (Qırım)” (Bala, 1955, p.741) in Tatars language Ukraine was one of the independently emerged states and She got the 'autonomous republic' status along which possesses the Crimea peninsula along with the with the referendum, made in 1999 after the collapse collapse of Soviet Union. From this date, Ukraine of Soviet Union. Crimea sustained its existence as an had to rearrange its relations both with the other autonomous structure linked to the Ukraine until the actors of international system and states separated referendum on March 16,2014, which was made from the former Soviet geography and restructured its approximately two weeks after the Russian invasion foreign policy simultaneously. Ukraine, which was in which is on debate in terms of legitimacy. Russia the process of restructuring its foreign policy, was signed and declared a treaty which showed that trying to solve internal problems, likewise the other Crimea and Sevastopol were linked to the Russia states which separated from the Soviet Union, on the after the referendum (Sputnik, 2014). Russia other hand, Ukraine was trying to sustain its former completed the official procedures of the binding economic, political and cultural ties with Russia and process of Crimea and this binding process was not She also tried to develop its relations with the other accepted primarily by Crimean Tatars, Ukraine, Western Countries (Hatipoğlu, 2004). Turkey, USA and European states and many Ukraine was trying to shuttle back and forth between countries have not recognized this process the West and East and She to determine its foreign annexation, therefore it has been waiting as an open- policy by doing so. Crimea Autonomous Republic ended problem which is required to be solved. was one of the most affected actors from the policies Crimea issue is not just a frozen, passive crisis. It is of the Ukraine. Crimea is named as the “Green on the negotiation table as an active problem which is 1 Sonmez,H.M., (2017). Comprehensive Overview of the Crimea Problem in the Second Anniversary of the Annexation of “Green Island”, Journal of Management and Information Science, Vol5(1),1-12. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Non-Commercial International License. Please visit for this license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Journal of Management and Information Science Corresponding Author. H.Murat Sonmez,Vol.5, No. 1 difficult to solve in the near future and currently, it is Current political, sociological and demographic a problem which is on debate by the parties and states structure of Crimea is not meeting the correct data of the world to solve the problem. which are necessary to overcome and solve the crises experienced in the Peninsula. To understand the What are the reasons that led to the invasion and struggle of past and today in Crimea and to annexation of Crimea by the Russia? Did Russia understand the role of Crimean Tatars within this really intervene to Crimea to protect the Russian struggle, historical process of the Crimea should be population against the racist attacks which was mentioned briefly. alleged by Russia? Will racist attacks against the Russia population which constitutes %58 of Crimea 2. Demography and History of Crimea population be carried out by the Crimean Tatars 2.1. Demographic Structure of Crimea which is the %12 of population or attacks will be carried out by Ukraine which is the %24 of On April 1, 2014, population of the Crimea in the population which is mostly known close to the official web-site of Ukraine is given as 1.968.550 Russia? Answers of these questions are hidden within (State Statistics Service of Ukraine, 2015). Majority the question of this justification and as a result Russia of the country's population is consisted of Russia and intervened to Crimea with similar reasons. Russia people of Ukraine and Crimean Tatars are the second claimed that the Armed Forces of Ukraine is and third in terms of magnitude. Population is insufficient, in terms of suppression of a possible consisted of; 58,32%, Russia, 24,32% Ukraine, racist attack and Russia preferred hybrid warfare 12,1% CT, %1,44 White Russians, 0,54% other instead of conventional warfare in this mission. Tatars, 0,43% Armenians and 0,22% Jews. Other Russia actualized the annexation of Crimea with a minority groups are consisted of Poles, Moldavians, special task unit which was consisted of 120 Azerbaijanis, Uzbeks, Koreans, Greeks and Blacksea individuals (Şamilkızı, 2014). Protection of strategic Germans, Chuvashes, Romans, Bulgarians and elements such as military bases and navy fleet of Georgians. Russia which are located in the region were shown as Summarizing the Crimea problem will ensure the a reason for the intervention in addition to the discussion and examination of Crimea problem on a security of the Russia citizens. One of the invisible correct basis. Vladimir Putin has admitted for the first reasons was primarily relation of Ukraine with the time that the plan to annex Crimea was ordered “western-centric” organizations such as EU and weeks before the referendum on self-determination. NATO which is hidden under the visible aforesaid Putin revealed secrets of Russia's Crimea takeover reasons that were explained by Russia for the Crimea plot. (BBC, 2015). “The Way Home” is a Russian intervention. Development of this relation showed documentary television film which premiered both on itself sometimes as “Orange Revolution” or “Gas Russian channel Rossiya 1 and on YouTube on Interruption” and sometimes as “change of power” in March 15, 2015 about the annexation of Crimea by Ukraine. Was Crimea used by Russia as a trump card the Russian Federation in 2014. The film features an for its struggle against “West”? Geo-strategic interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin location of Crimea in the north of the Black sea, is disclosing various aspects of Crimean crisis. Putin, in the gateway to Russia to reach the warm seas, there is particular, revealed that he had taken personal charge a claim that Crimea has virgin energy resources, of Crimean annexation and that in case of declarations of Putin which claim that Crimea should "unfavorable scenario on the peninsula" Russia could belong to Russia historically, are those included in have placed its nuclear weapons on combat readiness. the reasons of intervention? Russia struggles to According to Rossiya 1documentary, Putin said a protect its reputation both in close periphery and meeting with officials had been held on 22-23 Middle East, “Fire” which may possibly occur in February to plan the rescue of Ukraine's deposed Ukraine might spread to the other regions, president. "I invited the leaders of our special developing relations of Crimean Tatars with the services and the ministry of defense to the Kremlin West, increase of Crimean Tatars population in and set them the task of saving the life of the Crimea more than the other ethnic groups and other president of Ukraine, who could simply have covered facts can be counted among the reasons of liquidated," he said. "We finished about seven in the the intervention. morning. When we were parting, I told all my 2 Sonmez,H.M., (2017). Comprehensive Overview of the Crimea Problem in the Second Anniversary of the Annexation of “Green Island”, Journal of Management and Information Science, Vol5(1),1-12. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Non-Commercial International License. Please visit for this license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Journal of Management and Information Science Corresponding Author. H.Murat Sonmez,Vol.5, No. 1 colleagues, 'We are forced to begin the work to bring security of Black Sea until the end of XVIIIth Crimea back into Russia'." (BBC, 2015).
Recommended publications
  • Explaining Foreign Policy Change in Transitional States
    Explaining Foreign Policy Change in Transitional States: A Case Study of Ukraine between Two Revolutions By © 2017 Lidiya Zubytska M.A., University of Notre Dame, 2004 B.A., Ivan Franko National University of L’viv, 2002 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Political Science and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Mariya Omelicheva Robert Rohrschneider Nazli Avdan Steven Maynard-Moody Erik Herron Date Defended: 24 July 2017 The dissertation committee for Lidiya Zubytska certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Explaining Foreign Policy Change in Transitional States: A Case Study of Ukraine between Two Revolutions Chair: Mariya Omelicheva Date Approved: 24 July 2017 ii ABSTRACT Over the span of a decade, Ukraine saw two revolutions that rocked its political and social life to the very core. The Orange revolution of 2004, a watershed event in the post-Soviet history of East European states, reversed the authoritarian trend in the country and proclaimed its course for democracy and integration with the European Union. However, reforms and electoral promises of the revolutionary leaders quickly turned into shambles, and instead another pro- Russian authoritarian leader consolidated power. As Ukrainian political elites vacillated between closer ties with the EU to its west and the Russian Federation to its east, the 2014 Revolution of Dignity rose again to defend the European future for Ukraine. In this work, I investigate the driving forces shaping foreign policymaking in Ukraine during these years. I posit that it was precisely because such policies were shaped in an uncertain post-revolutionary transitional political environment that we are able to see seemingly contradictory shifts in Ukraine’s relations with the EU and Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P
    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
    [Show full text]
  • The Flag of the Russo-American Company
    19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: The Flag of the Russo-American Company Author(s): Dr. Svetlana G. Federova Published by: Academy of Sciences, U.S.S.R. iSource: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: www.fortross.org Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the source of the content; if you use material from FRC online, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org.” Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association, connects people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. © Fort Ross Conservancy, 19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450, 707-847-3437 7 ,t:» ~ He,n·s: Thl' Central Pacific Hailroad. - Ground brokl' January Sth. 186.3. completed :\Ia~ · 8th. 186!J. Stanford: The PacifiC' H.ailroad ground hrokt•n - Jan~·· Sth 1863, an ~l complett'd l\la~· 8th 1869. (!'\ole omission of "Cmtral," ab­ breviation of "January.'' and addition of "and.'') SIDE NO. 4 - Hewt's: (in nine diagonall~·-rising lint's: "Directors'' onlv in quotes): "Directors" - Hon. Leland Stanford - Charles Crocker - ~lark Hopkins - E. H. l\liller. Jr. - C. P. Huntington - E. B. CrockPr - A. l'. Stanford - Charles :\Iarsh. Stanford: (in on I~· eight diagonall~ · -rising lint's): Directors of Photo courtesy of State H ermitagc Museum, Leningrad the - C.P.H..R. of Cal.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Imperialism? Evaluating Russia’S Acquisition of Crimea in the Context of National and International Law Trevor Mcdougal
    BYU Law Review Volume 2015 | Issue 6 Article 15 December 2015 A New Imperialism? Evaluating Russia’s Acquisition of Crimea in the Context of National and International Law Trevor McDougal Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Trevor McDougal, A New Imperialism? Evaluating Russia’s Acquisition of Crimea in the Context of National and International Law, 2015 BYU L. Rev. 1847 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2015/iss6/15 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 12.MCDOUGAL.AA-2 (DO NOT DELETE) 4/4/2016 12:26 PM A New Imperialism? Evaluating Russia’s Acquisition of Crimea in the Context of National and International Law I. INTRODUCTION In November 2013, after some progress toward greater economic union between Ukraine and the European Union, then- current President Yanukovych suspended Ukraine’s preparations for a trade deal with the European Union, instead choosing closer ties with Russia.1 During the following three months, a variety of protests took place with some physical confrontations also occurring.2 On February 18, 2014, the confrontations between protestors and police officers reached their bloodiest day yet, leading to the deaths of at least eighteen people, with casualties on both sides.3 In the aftermath of the violence, President Yanukovych fled from the country and was replaced by an interim leader, Oleksandr Turchynov, who acted as president until elections were held in May.4 Hours after Yanukovych fled, he was impeached by Ukraine’s parliament for abusing his powers.5 Russia sent forces to the Crimea region of Ukraine, despite repeated claims by Putin that there were “no Russian units in eastern Ukraine .
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE of CONTENTS 1. Prologue
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Prologue .………………...…………………………………………………….page 4 Chapter I Theoretical Framework 2. International relations theories………... …………………...............................page 5 3. Conceptualizing NATO enlargement: an integrated approach……………...…page 9 Chapter II The history and identity of NATO 4. NATO general overview………………………………………...…………...page 11 5. NATO during the Cold War…………………………………...……………..page 13 6. NATO after the Cold War…………………………………...……………….page 17 Chapter III NATO Enlargement 7. Historical Background……………………………………………………….page 23 8. Drivers of enlargement………………………………………………………page 30 9. NATO’s first enlargement round…………………...…………………….....page 32 10. NATO’s second enlargement round………………………………..………...page 35 Chapter IV Black Sea and NATO 1. Black Sea and NATO………………………………………………………..page 40 2. The Black Sea in the context of NATO enlargement…….……………..…...page 41 3. Wider Black Sea Area – Security issues and threats……….………….…....page 43 4. Significance of the Black Sea…………………….……………………….....page 44 5. NATO’s interest in the WBSA……………………….…………………..….page 45 Chapter V Perspectives on the enlargement 1. Russia’s perspective on the enlargement……………………………………page 52 2. Turkey’s perspective on the enlargement…………………………………...page 54 3. NATO Bucharest Summit 2008…………………………...………………..page 57 Chapter VI Study Case, Ukraine 1. Ukraine’s Political Situation…………………………..…………………...page 62 2. NATO and the Orange Revolution …………………………………………page 63 3. Opinion polls on NATO’s enlargement ………………...……………….....page 64 4. Ukraine’s latest status regarding the North Atlantic Alliance……...…….....page 66 5. Conclusions………………………………………………………………….page 73 1 Chapter VII Study Case, Georgia 1. The Rose Revolution…………………………….………………………....page 78 2. Georgia and US, NATO political relations…….…………………………..page 81 3. Georgia as feasible NATO member……….……………………………....page 83 4. Russian – Georgia War 2008; ……….…………………………………....page 85 5. The Aftermath of the 5 days War……….………………………………....page 87 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditions in Russia Hon. William H. King
    68TH CONORE88 SENATE fDoCUMENT let Seaion J - I No. 126 CONDITIONS IN RUSSIA SPEECH OF HON. WILLIAM H. KING A SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF UTAH DELIVERED IN THE SENATE JANUARY 22 AND APRIL 24,1924 PRESENTED BY MR. LODGE MAY 26,1924.-Ordered to be printed WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1924 CONDITIONS IN RUSSIA S P BEE CH OF HON, WILLIAM H. KING OFP UTAiH IN THE SENATE OF THE IJNITED STATES J(Inlearyi 22 and Aptil 214, 1924 Mr. the Russia (question has been theMri.subject14ING.of, frequentPresident,discuselon In the Senate during and since the World WVar. lt hat$ provoked great Interest not only in the, executive anid legislative departments of our Gov- ernment but, amoPg; jthe American people. Not only in the United States, but throughout tbe world; the situations1 Rus- sia under Bolshevik' rule Ilas Ofrofoundly- affected the people and has been ;the cause of serious disquietude, If not grave alarm, Ruslsa's vast territory,, her unnumbered millions of population, her dloipinatlng position in Europe and Asla, her menacing attitude toward the ,governments and social sys- temn of the world-all conspire to make the Russian problem one of thf most, important. with which the world has had to deal. This problem is Aot a local, one;At is a world problem, The future, oYf Asia is involved in, the future of. Russia; and Europe's future cannot be dissoclated from the Russian people. While Russia Is in p"art oriental, she reaches far into the OccM- dent,.aud aPan"-Slav movement draws within its circle many States.
    [Show full text]
  • ECFG-Croatia-2021R.Pdf
    About this Guide This guide is designed to prepare you to deploy to culturally complex environments and achieve mission objectives. The fundamental information contained within will help you understand the cultural dimension of your assigned location and gain skills necessary for ECFG success (Photo: The Dalmatian coastal town of Primošten). The guide consists of 2 parts: of Republic Part 1 is the “Culture General” section, which provides the foundational knowledge you need to operate effectively in any global environment with a focus on Southeast Europe. Part 2 is the “Culture Specific” section, which describes unique cultural features of Croatian society. It applies culture-general concepts to help increase your knowledge of your assigned deployment location. This section is designed to complement other pre-deployment Croatia training (Photo: A display of bread in a fire pit in Dalmatia, Croatia). For further information, contact the AFCLC Region Team at [email protected] or visit the AFCLC website at https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AFCLC/. Disclaimer: All text is the property of the AFCLC and may not be modified by a change in tit le, content, or labeling. It may be reproduced in its current format with the express permission of the AFCLC. All photography is provided as a courtesy of the US government, Wikimedia, and other sources. GENERAL CULTURE PART 1 – CULTURE GENERAL What is Culture? Fundamental to all aspects of human existence, culture shapes the way humans view life and functions as a tool we use to adapt to our social and physical environments. A culture is the sum of all of the beliefs, values, behaviors, and symbols that have meaning for a society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Collapse and the Charm of Hindsight 75
    The Soviet Collapse and the Charm of Hindsight 75 Chapter 4 The Soviet Collapse and the Charm of Hindsight Rodric Braithwaite Those on the spot always get some things wrong: memory later be- trays them. Those who subsequently try to disentangle the story always miss part of the context. In politics, perceptions and emotions are as important as reason. The theme of what follows is that we cannot un- derstand the causes and consequences of the Soviet collapse unless we take every account of its deep roots in the past and the strong emotions that accompanied it. It is of course imprudent, or even impertinent, for foreigners to pontificate about how “most Russians” think or feel. But it is an essential part of the story. In this deliberately personal account I attempt to recreate how the collapse looked to me at the time and in the aftermath, drawing on a detailed diary, my reporting to London, and on later writings. I. How it Looked at the Time A Kind of Democracy Poland shows the way I witnessed two attempts to bring a kind of democracy to the com- munist world. The Polish experiment of the late 1950s and the Soviet experiment of the late 1980s are now largely forgotten or ignored. Both are significant for the history of the time, and for an understanding of the events of today. In October 1956 the Poles expelled their Soviet advisers, abolished the collective farms, allowed people to travel abroad, and gave a de- gree of freedom to the press. They were encouraged by Khrushchev’s denunciation of Stalin, and driven by a combination of patriotism, a 75 76 exiting the cold war, entering a new world liberal faction inside the Party, and an alliance between students and workers.
    [Show full text]
  • North East and Central Asia OSCE Focus Conference Proceedings
    OSCE Focus Conference Proceedings, 9–10 October 2015, Maison de la Paix, Geneva OSCE Focus Conference Proceedings, 9–10 October 2015, Maison de la Paix, Geneva OSCE Focus Conference Proceedings, 9–10 October 2015, Maison de la Paix, Geneva GENEVA CENTRE FOR THE DEMOCRATIC CONTROL OF ARMED FORCES (DCAF) The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) isis anan internationalinternational foundationfoundation whosewhose missionmission isis toto assistassist thethe internationalinternational communitycommunity inin pursuingpursuing goodgood governancegovernance andand reformreform ofof thethe securitysecurity sector.sector. TheThe CentreCentre developsdevelops andand promotespromotes normsnorms andand OSCE Focus Conference Proceedings standards, conducts tailored policy research, identies good practices and recommendations to promote democratic security sector 9–10 October 2015,North Maison East de and la Paix,Central Geneva Asia governance, and provides in‐country advisory support and practical assistance programmes. The Swiss Federal Department published by DCAF of Foreign Aairs (Geneva(Geneva CentreCentre forfor thethe provided support for the Democratic Control of organisation of the Conference Armed Forces) DCAF and funded the production of PO Box 1361 thisthis publication.publication. 1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland www.dcaf.ch DCAF DCAF DCAF photo: graduateinstitute.orgwww.d.dcaf.ch OSCEO SFoCEcO usFoSCE cus Fo cus EurooEuropeo inpeEuro C risis:inope Crisis: in C risis: ReneRweneedRw eneRelede wRelvancede vancRele ofeevanc
    [Show full text]
  • The Nationality Rooms Program at the University of Pittsburgh (1926-1945)
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 6-2004 “Imagined Communities” in Showcases: The Nationality Rooms Program at The University of Pittsburgh (1926-1945) Lucia Curta Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Curta, Lucia, "“Imagined Communities” in Showcases: The Nationality Rooms Program at The University of Pittsburgh (1926-1945)" (2004). Dissertations. 1089. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1089 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “IMAGINED COMMUNITIES” IN SHOWCASES: THE NATIONALITY ROOMS PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH (1926-1945) by Lucia Curta A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2004 “IMAGINED COMMUNITIES” IN SHOWCASES: THE NATIONALITY ROOMS PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH (1926-1945) Lucia Curta, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2004 From the inception of the program in 1926, the Nationality Rooms at the University of Pittsburgh were viewed as apolitical in their iconography. Their purpose was
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Ukraine Partition Treaty
    Russia Ukraine Partition Treaty Dunc is dog-tired and makes sightlessly as parsonical Chrissy compromising equanimously and slaughter intertwiningly. Migratory Georges sometimes instates any platen ratifying conversely. Unshouting and mimical Harrold often disinfects some Aquarius sadly or backbiting sweepingly. Kiev in addition to avoid further to the cold war to partition treaty or democracy on territory of hungary, but then a streamlined process, putin said its In france at preventing her, a national or both be. Separatist region and hurt basic security council both extremes might just hours after being on base in me throughout territories. Please enter your name. Army size of that is far right accrues when ukraine as a puppet state, these ends up is a giant jigsaw puzzle. Russia is precisely because wolff that now is soon as well as integral part still existed then, encompassing most observers. We may contain inappropriate material breach by russian pilots made from russia poses, when comments are on territory from rational, sweden by pierre laval. Pınar İpek examining committee of ukraine and. International treaty make ukraine, partition too soon lost their families. Russian president joe biden is. Minsk ii and benefits which he was ready to share its vast area around the french frontiers with the liberum veto on a russian presence in. The partition treaty of nato was always stood on another important for that system. Originally interested in history has publicly questioning of ukraine conflict with programmes for partitioning powers would not recognize crimea are. Even though poland or ukraine, because it would have. Ukraine also reduce its.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crimean Annexation by Russia in 2014
    Master’s Thesis 2016 30 ECTS Department of International Environment and Development Studies The Crimean annexation by Russia in 2014 Olga Larsen International Relations The Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric, is the international gateway for the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU). Eight departments, associated research institutions and the Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine in Oslo. Established in 1986, Noragric’s contribution to international development lies in the interface between research, education (Bachelor, Master and PhD programmes) and assignments. The Noragric Master thesis are the final theses submitted by students in order to fulfil the requirements under the Noragric Master programme “International Environmental Studies”, “International Development Studies” and “International Relations”. The findings in this thesis do not necessarily reflect the views of Noragric. Extracts from this publication may only be reproduced after prior consultation with the author and on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation contact Noragric. © Olga Larsen, June 2016 [email protected] [email protected] Noragric Department of International Environment and Development Studies P.O. Box 5003 N-1432 Ås Norway Tel.: +47 67 23 00 00 Internet: https://www.nmbu.no/om/fakulteter/samvit/institutter/noragric Declaration I, Olga Larsen, declare that this thesis is a result of my research investigations and findings. Sources of information other than my own have been acknowledged and a reference list has been appended. This work has not been previously submitted to any other university for award of any type of academic degree. Signature Date Acknowledgements I thank my supervisor Kirsti Stuvøy for guiding me.
    [Show full text]