DOCSLIB.ORG

North Lanarkshire Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Lanarkshire Council North Lanarkshire Council Planning Applications for consideration of Planning Sub-Committee Committee Date: 20-09-2018 Ordnance Survey maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey with permission of HMSO Crown Copyright reserved APPLICATIONS FOR PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE 20th September 2018 Page Application No Applicant Development/Site Recommendation No 7-24 17/00518/PPP WB Properties Residential Development Refuse Scotland Ltd (Permission in Principle) (Request for Site North Of Bellshill Road Hearing) Uddingston 25-33 18/00816/AMD Design & Build Erection of Two Semi-Detached Grant (Scotland) Ltd Dwellinghouses and Alterations to Plot 1 Garden Area (Amendment to Permission 17/01910/FUL) Site Off Cumbernauld Road & Whitehill Avenue Stepps 34-39 18/01195/FUL Bridges Pole Mounted Number Plate Grant Antonine LLP Recognition with 2 Cameras C/o Savills within Antonine Shopping Centre (UK) Limited Car Park (In Retrospect) Antonine Centre Tryst Road Town Centre Cumbernauld Application No: Proposed Development: 17/00518/PPP Residential Development (Permission in Principle) Site Address: Site North Of Bellshill Road Uddingston Date Registered: 7th April 2017 Applicant: Agent: WB Properties Scotland Ltd Paul Houghton 3 Inveresk Place 102 High Street Coatbridge Dunblane North Lanarkshire Stirling ML5 2DA FK15 0ER Application Level: Contrary to Development Plan: Major Application Yes Ward: Representations: 14 Thorniewood 5 letters of representation received. Robert Burrows, Hugh Gaffney, Steven Bonnar & 15 Bellshill Colin Cameron, Angela Campbell, Harry Curran, Jordan Linden Recommendation: Refuse Reasoned Justification: The proposed development is contrary to the Development Plan (Clydeplan Strategic Development Plan 2017 and North Lanarkshire Local Plan 2012) as it fails to meet three of the six qualities of Placemaking being in a location surrounded by industry, active railways, busy roads and set at a lower ground level thereby offering an extremely low level of amenity for future residents and is therefore not considered appropriate to support residential development given the surrounding built context and noise evident on the site which is significantly above recommended limits. The site also has constrained ability to support active travel and it has not been demonstrated that a need exists for housing at this location. Reproduced by permission of Planning Application: 17/00518/PPP the Ordnance Survey on behalf Name (of applicant): WB Properties of HMSO. © Crown Copyright and database right 2009. All Scotland Ltd rights reserved. Ordnance Site Address: Site North Of Bellshill Road, Survey Licence number Uddingston 100023396. Development: Residential Development (Permission in Principle) Recommendation: Refuse for the Following Reasons:- 1. The proposed development is contrary to the Sustainability and Placemaking policies of Scottish Planning Policy (SPP), fails to meet three of the six qualities of Placemaking contained in Policy 1 of the Clydeplan Strategic Development Plan 2017 (Welcoming, Safe and Pleasant, and Easy to Move Around), and conflicts with policies DSP2 (Location of Development), and criterion 3a of DSP4 (Quality of Development) of the North Lanarkshire Local Plan being in a location surrounded by industry, active railways, busy roads and set at a lower ground level thereby offering an extremely low level of amenity for future residents and is therefore not considered appropriate to support residential development given the surrounding built context. 2. It has not been demonstrated that road noise on the eastern and south-eastern parts of the site, nor that the general noise levels on the site which are significantly above World Health Organisation recommended limits can be satisfactorily mitigated thereby conflicting with Planning Advice Note 1/2011: Planning and Noise, the Welcoming, and Safe and Pleasant qualities of Placemaking Policy 1 of the Clydeplan Strategic Development Plan 2017, and Policy DSP 4 (Quality of Development) of the North Lanarkshire Local Plan. 3. The proposed development is contrary to Policy 18 (Strategic Walking and Cycling Network) of the Clydeplan Strategic Development Plan 2017, and Policies DSP 2 (Location of Development) and criterion 3b of DSP 4 (Quality of Development) of the North Lanarkshire Local Plan, as it has not been demonstrated that the proposed development would encourage a modal shift away from private car use. The site is located in excess of maximum walking standards for public transport and most catchment schools, and the nearby external footway network leading northward is substandard in width with no physical opportunity for its improvement and where opportunities to enhance the Strategic Walking and Cycling Network are constrained with only a potential connection to the south, collectively thereby likely placing heavy reliance upon car based trips. 4. The proposed development is contrary to Policy 8: Housing Land Requirement; and does not meet the criteria for Sustainable Location Assessment (as contained within Diagram 10) of the Clydeplan Strategic Development Plan 2017, and conflicts with Policy DSP1 (Amount of Development) of the North Lanarkshire Local Plan. There is no shortfall of housing within the Motherwell sub-market housing area and there are sustainable sites which can contribute to any claimed shortfall in overall housing land supply within North Lanarkshire. Background Papers: Consultation Responses: Memos from Protective Services received 1st May 2017, 6th June 2017, 7th June 2017, 30th June 2017, 21st July 2017, 25th August 2017, 12th October 2017, 17th November 2017, 23rd November 2017, and 21st February 2018, 19th July 2018, 24th August 2018, 31st August 2018 and 7 September 2018 Memos from Transportation received 21st July 2017, 10th August 2017, 9th October 2017, 12th October 2017, and 2nd November 2017 Memos from Greenspace received 5th June 2017 & 21st July 2017 Memos from Education received 15th May 2017, 13th October 2017, and 5th September 2018 Letter from Transport Scotland received 21st April 2017 Letters from Scottish Power received 19th April 2017 & 19th May 2017 Letter from Scottish Gas Network received 25th April 2017 Letter from Scottish Environment Protection Agency received 15th May 2017 Letter from Network Rail received 12th May 2017 Letter from South Lanarkshire Council received 17th November 2017 Contact Information: Any person wishing to inspect these documents should contact Mrs Joanne Delaney at 01236 632500. Report Date: 7th September 2018 APPLICATION NO. 17/00518/PPP REPORT 1. Site Description 1.1 The application site is located on the southern edge of Uddingston and aligns the Council boundary with South Lanarkshire. The site extends to approximately 4.6 hectares and is largely triangular in shape due to it being sandwiched between two operational railway lines converging on a north-westward course. The M74 also lies nearby to the south. The site comprises open fields mainly of scrubland with small drainage ditches being evident at the east and west edges. Semi-mature trees/bushes exist along the north and south edges whilst a concentration of woodland occupies the western half where the site narrows considerably to 10 metres at its edge. The site itself is subject of undulating topography but takes on a partial basin formation at its south-eastern side due to Bellshill Road rising to carry vehicular traffic over the southern railway line, whilst adjoining land generally within this part of Uddingston sits on a downward slope such that the land and railway to the north also sit at a significantly elevated position in excess of 6 metres and rising. 1.2 Beyond the railway to the north lies industrial/commercial premises to the north-west, woodland north-centrally, and the Ashley Park housing estate to the north-east. On the site’s frontage off Bellshill Road lies two sandstone dwellings and an electrical sub-station, whilst opposite to the east lies a small development of 5 modern houses. Otherwise land stretching eastward from Bellshill Road to the A725 Bellshill Bypass comprises open fields with concentrations of woodland. To the south beyond the railway lies an industrial estate within South Lanarkshire. 2. Proposed Development 2.1 Permission in principle is sought for residential development of the site. Since the application was continued at 21st March 2018 meeting of the Planning Sub-Committee, the applicant submitted four indicative site layouts, the first submitted on 2nd July 2018 conveyed the provision of 93 houses. A further three site layouts were submitted on 20th August 2018 detailing 78 houses; a mix of 110 houses and flats; and 244 flats. In order to mitigate noise, acoustic barriers measuring 2, 3, and 4.7 metres high are proposed on site boundaries, whilst houses themselves will be orientated a certain way on the eastern and south-eastern parts of the site to mitigate noise in garden areas. 3. Applicant’s Supporting Information 3.1 The applicant submitted supporting information in respect of the following:- Pre-application consultation report; Design and access statement; Transport assessment; Ecology report; Flooding and drainage assessments; Site investigation; Noise and vibration impact assessment; and Planning statement. 3.2 The Pre-Application Consultation report summarised the public events which were held on 17th March 2017 at the Bothwell Community Hall, and on 20th March 2017 at VIP Pass, McCulloch Avenue, Fallside, both of which were publicised in the Bellshill Speaker beforehand. 3.3 The Planning
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Wednesday Volume 654 13 February 2019 No. 252 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 13 February 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 865 13 FEBRUARY 2019 866 Tim Loughton (East Worthing and Shoreham) (Con): House of Commons May I declare an interest, having recently joined the hon. Member for Stretford and Urmston (Kate Green) Wednesday 13 February 2019 on a visit with Oxfam in Jordan? I very much welcome the London initiative. Will urgent steps be taken to take account of the fact that youth unemployment in the The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock country is now some 38%? Not only is there a high level of female unemployment, but the participation rate of women in the workforce in Jordan is even lower than PRAYERS that in Saudi Arabia. Will those urgent objectives be at the heart of what the Secretary of State is trying to achieve? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Penny Mordaunt: I can reassure my hon. Friend that that will absolutely be the case. This issue has been a Oral Answers to Questions focus for me personally on my visits to Jordan, and I will be focusing on it at the London conference. Mr Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) (Lab/Co-op): Does INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT the Secretary of State realise that one thing holding back development in Jordan is the number of children and young people killed on the roads there? I spoke at a The Secretary of State was asked— conference in Jordan recently, where we looked at this area.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Official Report
    Tuesday Volume 645 17 July 2018 No. 173 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 17 July 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 203 17 JULY 2018 204 Mary Creagh (Wakefield) (Lab): Britain needs about House of Commons £22 billion a year of investment in clean energy to meet our legally binding EU renewables targets, but my Tuesday 17 July 2018 Committee heard that, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, investment has collapsed over the past The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock two years. Given that the Brexit White Paper says that the Government believe that there is no need for a PRAYERS common rulebook on environmental or climate change rules, what confidence can investors in offshore or [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] onshore wind have that the Government will support low-carbon energy if we leave? BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS UNIVERSITY OF LONDON BILL [LORDS] Greg Clark: We are very clear in our support for that Second Reading opposed and deferred until Tuesday in the clean growth strategy and, as the hon. Lady can 4 September (Standing Order No. 20). see, in the level of investment that is being made right across the country. It was very clear in the White Paper ROTHERHAM INDEPENDENT REVIEW that followed the Chequers meeting that we had made a Resolved, commitment to the highest of environmental standards. That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That she will be graciously pleased to give directions that there be laid before this House a Return of a Paper, entitled The Rotherham Peter Kyle (Hove) (Lab): I recently visited the Rampion Independent Review: a review into information passed to the Home offshore wind farm, which is a stunning achievement, Office in connection with allegations of Child Sexual Abuse in supplying enough power for a third of Sussex’s needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Action Plan
    NOISE ACTION PLAN Noise Action Plan 2018-2023 NOISE ACTION PLAN 2018-2023 1 CONTENTS 1 Foreword 3 APPENDICES 2 Executive summary 4 Appendix A 28 Noise contour maps 3 Introduction 7 3.1 Purpose 7 Appendix B 31 3.2 Scope 7 Financial information 3.3 Airport description 7 3.4 Consultation 7 Appendix C 32 Schedule of consultees 4 Legal & policy framework 8 4.1 The ICAO and the ‘Balanced Approach’ 8 Appendix D 38 4.2 European Union 8 Summary of consultation responses 4.3 UK Government 8 4.4 Scottish Government 9 5 Aircraft noise & its effects 10 5.1 Introduction to aircraft noise 10 5.2 Measuring and assessing aircraft noise 10 6 Noise management at Glasgow Airport 12 6.1 Aircraft technology 12 6.2 Quieter operating procedures 12 6.3 Noise insulation and land-use planning 15 6.4 Operating restrictions 15 6.5 Working with local communities 15 7 Airspace change consultation 16 8 Results of 2017 noise mapping 18 9 Noise Action Plan 21 10 Monitoring & reporting on our progress 27 2 NOISE ACTION PLAN 2018-2023 1 FOREWORD Glasgow Airport is one of Scotland’s Operating such an important national asset comes with responsibilities, and in talking to our neighbouring communities primary infrastructure assets and and other stakeholders, I know that airport-related noise is an an integral part of the social and important issue for people. economic welfare of the West of Scotland, supporting over 7,000 Managing noise effects is an integral part of how we grow the airport responsibly in a manner which balances the positive jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Monklands Independent Review Report
    An independent review of the process followed by NHS Lanarkshire Monklands Replacement/Refurbishment Project (MRRP) Report of the Independent Review Panel June 2019 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Monklands District General Hospital: Background ........................................................ 5 1.2. The Need for Replacement/Refurbishment of the Monklands Hospital ........................ 5 1.3. NHS Lanarkshire ‘Monklands Replacement/Review Project’ (MRRP) ............................ 5 1.4. Call for Independent Review ......................................................................................... 6 2. LAY SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 7 3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Recommendations for action (1): MRRP Team ............................................................ 10 3.2. Recommendations (2): General Guidance ................................................................... 11 4. PROCESS FOLLOWED BY THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL AND GUIDANCE USED ............ 14 4.1. Remit of the Independent Review .............................................................................. 14 4.2. Summary of the Independent Review Panels Process ................................................. 14 4.3. Relevant Guidance
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Labour Activists Slam 'Constant
    PAGE 8 SYRIA: A LETTER FROM A YPG VOLUNTEER SCOTTISH LABOUR: HOW NOT FOR PEACE AND SOCIALISM TO HANDLE A GAFFE PAGE 9 £1 Monday February 12 2018 Proudly owned by our readers | Incorporating the Daily Worker | Est 1930 | morningstaronline.co.uk As the NHS nears its 70th birthday on July 5, marches and demonstrations are beingNOW held across 54 towns andLABOUR cities today demanding action over the crisis ■ NEWS PLOTTERS SET CORBYN’S GREEN ENERGY BATTLE LABOUR leader reiterates calls for public ownership of Britain’s energy system to help combat the “threat of climate catastrophe.” THEIR SIGHTS Turn to page 2 ■ WORLD 30,000 RALLY AGAINST RACISM ITALIANS took to the streets at the weekend in a show against fascism following ON LEONARD a shooting spree targeting migrants. Turn to page 6 SCOTTISH LABOUR ACTIVISTS SLAM ‘CONSTANT UNDERMINING OF LEADER’ by Our News Desk “lacking leadership” on Brexit. day, a Holyrood insider leaked who, in the words of one the leadership for using the Days earlier, the Scottish a story about former leader- activist, are engaged in “the term “a chinky” to describe Daily Mail received fi gures ship contender Anas Sarwar sort of refusal we saw to a Chinese takeaway during a SCOTTISH Labour grandees suggesting that the apparently refusing to sit accept Corbyn’s victory in speech. have been accused of plotting Unite union had next to Mr Leonard during 2015, now being repeated in Mr Sarwar and others have against party leader Richard spent more on First Minister’s Questions. Scotland.” Mr Corbyn’s early since accused Mr Leonard of Leonard, following a week of backing Mr Supporters of Mr Leon- leadership days were plagued a lacklustre response — but ■ SPORT negative headlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Wednesday Volume 652 16 January 2019 No. 235 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 16 January 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1143 16 JANUARY 2019 1144 12. Marion Fellows (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP): House of Commons What recent discussions he has had with the Home Secretary on the potential effect on Scotland of UK Wednesday 16 January 2019 immigration policy after the UK leaves the EU. [908517] 14. Drew Hendry (Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Strathspey) (SNP): What recent discussions he has had with the Home Secretary on the potential effect on PRAYERS Scotland of UK immigration policy after the UK leaves the EU. [908519] [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] The Secretary of State for Scotland (David Mundell): This has been a momentous week for Andy Murray, so I Speaker’s Statement am sure you will agree, Mr Speaker, that it is appropriate that at this Scottish questions we acknowledge in this Mr Speaker: Order. Colleagues will no doubt have House Andy’s extraordinary contribution to British seen a number of images taken by Members of scenes in sport, and his personal resilience and courage, and the Division Lobby last night. I would like to remind all express our hope that we will once again see Andy Murray colleagues that, as the recently issued guide to the rules on court. of behaviour and courtesies of the House makes explicitly I am in regular contact with the Home Secretary on a clear, Members range of issues of importance to Scotland, including “must not use any device to take photographs, film or make audio future immigration policy after the UK leaves the European recordings in or around the Chamber.” Union.
    [Show full text]
  • GLASGOW AIRPORT MODERNISING OUR FLIGHTPATHS Consultation Document Introduction of Area Navigation (RNAV) Procedures January 2018
    Modernising our flightpaths GLASGOW AIRPORT MODERNISING OUR FLIGHTPATHS Consultation Document Introduction of aRea NAVigation (RNAV) Procedures January 2018 glasgowairport.com/airspace The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may 1 be made of the information contained therein. GLASGOW AIRPORT - MODERNISING OUR FLIGHTPATHS CONSULTATION DOCUMENT FOREWORD The communities that we serve at Glasgow Airport have We also have a dedicated website - always been central to our decision-making processes www.glasgowairport.com/airspace - which provides and our success. Together, throughout our 52-year history, further information. we have worked in partnership to achieve a great deal and as we look to the future we want our communities to We are fully committed to growing the airport responsibly remain at the heart of our business. We are continually and modernising our airspace will help us achieve that. In improving the airport - investing and modernising to grow that spirit we very much encourage you to take some time in a responsible and sustainable way. That is why your to consider our proposals and we look forward to hearing feedback is critically important to our continued success. from you before the consultation period ends on Friday 13 April 2018. An industry-wide drive, led by our regulator, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), to create airspace infrastructure fit for the 21st century is now underway as part of its Future Airspace Strategy (FAS). A key element of the strategy involves the replacement of selected ground- based navigation aids across the UK with procedures predicated on new state-of-the-art satellite navigation Mark Johnston systems by the end of the decade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between the UK and Scottish Governments
    House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee The relationship between the UK and Scottish Governments Eighth Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 22 May 2019 HC 1586 Published on 7 June 2019 by authority of the House of Commons The Scottish Affairs Committee The Scottish Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Scotland Office (including (i) relations with the Scottish Parliament and (ii) administration and expenditure of the offices of the Advocate General for Scotland (but excluding individual cases and advice given within government by the Advocate General)). Current membership Pete Wishart MP (Scottish National Party, Perth and North Perthshire) (Chair) Deidre Brock MP (Scottish National Party, Edinburgh North and Leith) David Duguid MP (Conservative, Banff and Buchan) Hugh Gaffney MP (Labour, Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) Christine Jardine MP (Liberal Democrat, Edinburgh West) Ged Killen MP (Labour (Co-op), Rutherglen and Hamilton West) John Lamont MP (Conservative, Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Paul Masterton MP (Conservative, East Renfrewshire) Danielle Rowley MP (Labour, Midlothian) Tommy Sheppard MP (Scottish National Party, Edinburgh East) Ross Thomson MP (Conservative, Aberdeen South) Kirstene Hair MP (Conservative, Angus) was also a Member of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Climate Emergency / Mark Banahan 25 Printed and Published Homes / Designing for Nature, Climate and People / Rebecca Pullinger 27 by UNP, the I.O
    NEW GROUND SUMMER 2019 Campaigning for environmental change & social justice CRISIS POINT Labour’s answers to the Climate & Environment Emergency Sue Hayman MP This is a Climate & Environment Emergency Clive Lewis MP Science tells us our Planet is Broken Liam Byrne MP Municipal Socialism Welcome to our 2019 Summer Edition What a difference a few months can make! largest climate mass lobby of Parliament we Our last issue of New Ground marked ten have seen in the UK with hundreds of MPs years of Labour’s Climate Change Act, which meeting and listening to their constituents was a landmark at its time, aiming to achieve concerns and fears face-to-face. We should 80% reduction in carbon emissions by 2050, also not forget the BBC’s Climate Change The and how we can build on that progress. Facts programme, the Committee on Climate Fast forward to the Summer of 2019 and Change’s report, the IPCC warnings and the UK now has a new net zero target and Labour councillors and Labour/SERA members one of Labour’s key policy commitments is pushing Climate Emergency declarations to kickstart a green industrial revolution. and putting in place plans to respond. This hasn’t happened overnight. We’ve seen Politicians can no longer ignore the environment a massive shift in public concern for the and climate emergency. It was thanks to Labour environment which is clearly illustrated in recent on the 1st May that Parliament unanimously polling. On the same day temperatures rose declared a climate emergency. The Shadow to record highs across the UK, a new ComRes Chancellor and SERA member John McDonnell survey showed 71% of the UK public believe has said the ‘existential threat to our planet the climate crisis is more important than Brexit.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA ITEM No
    NORTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM No. ELECTORAL WARD No. 13 (THORNIEWOOD) BY−ELECTION DATE OF BY−ELECTION: 9 JULY 2015 I Gavin Whitefield, Returning Officer for the above by−election, hereby give notice that the votes cast were as follows. Total Ballot Papers received 3,346 Invalid votes 38 Total Valid Votes 3,308 Electoral quota 1,655 Percentage poll 28.2% that the votes cast for each of the candidates were as follows: Name Number of Votes Steven Bonnar 1,555 Scottish National Party (SNP) Hugh Gaffney 1,410 Scottish Labour Party Meghan Gallacher 149 Scottish Conservative and Unionist Patrick Pearse McAleer 51 Scottish Green Party Liam McCabe 81 Scottish Socialist Party Craig Smith 33 Scottish Christian Party "Proclaiming Christ's Lordship" Matt Williams 29 UK Independence Party (UKIP) and that, as the number of votes for no candidate equalled or exceeded the electoral quota there was excluded from the election at the first stage Matt Williams. On the transfer of the ballot papers for Matt Williams, 4 ballot papers were non−transferable as no next available preference was given and the votes then credited to each continuing candidate were as follows: Name Number of Votes Steven Bonnar 1,556 Scottish National Party (SNP) Hugh Gaffney 1,417 Scottish Labour Party Meghan Gallacher 158 Scottish Conservative and Unionist Patrick Pearse McAleer 55 Scottish Green Party Liam McCabe 81 Scottish Socialist Party Craig Smith 37 Scottish Christian Party "Proclaiming Christ's Lordship" and that, as the number of votes for no candidate equalled or exceeded the electoral quota there was excluded from the election at the second stage Craig Smith.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    Meeting of the Parliament Wednesday 3 April 2019 Session 5 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.parliament.scot or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Wednesday 3 April 2019 CONTENTS Col. PORTFOLIO QUESTION TIME ............................................................................................................................... 1 ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE AND LAND REFORM ........................................................................................ 1 Air Quality Improvement Programmes (Support) ......................................................................................... 1 Air Pollution in Edinburgh ............................................................................................................................. 2 Trail Hunting (Definition) ............................................................................................................................... 3 Post-Brexit Environmental Governance ....................................................................................................... 4 Deposit Return Scheme (Exemptions) ......................................................................................................... 5 Fly Tipping (Alleviation) ................................................................................................................................ 6 Special Marine Protected Areas (Consultation) ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Tuesday Volume 655 5 March 2019 No. 263 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 5 March 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 785 5 MARCH 2019 786 strategic road network, which could perhaps fund projects House of Commons such as the one he raises. Additionally, our £2.7 billion transforming cities fund will support Plymouth and its Tuesday 5 March 2019 surrounding areas in particular. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Scott Mann (North Cornwall) (Con): Meur ras, Mr Speaker.Gool Peran lowen—happy St Piran’sday—and Kernow bys vyken! PRAYERS The announcement yesterday on the stronger towns fund did not include any areas from Cornwall, yet [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Cornwall has always scored very highly on social deprivation and funding. I know that the coastal communities fund has been a help, but what assurance can I have from the Oral Answers to Questions Treasury that it will support towns in my area? Robert Jenrick: The stronger towns fund announced TREASURY this week will provide support for the south-west and all regions of the country, both in terms of direct funding The Chancellor of the Exchequer was asked— to be paid to local enterprise partnerships and the Infrastructure Funding: Devon and Cornwall competitive fund of £600 million that towns in the my hon. Friend’s constituency and those of other right 1. Kevin Foster (Torbay) (Con): What plans he has to hon.
    [Show full text]