William Jay of Frederick Co

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

William Jay of Frederick Co Feb 2020 To Family History Enthusiasts, As a continuation to the William Jay of Frederick Co. VA manuscript published on the Jay Family Association website in December 2019, the following begins the next chapter of that work detailing the life of oldest son William Jay (Jr.) AND all of his documented children. Due to the scope and size of this chapter, it will be posted in 6 – 7 separate segments over the course of several months. This chapter section is laid out in book format (continued page numbering) and covers the life of William Jr. and his two oldest daughters Mary and Sarah. The next chapter section to follow (Summer 2020) will continue with William Jr.’s sons William (III), David and James. As stated previously it is the intention of the authors to continue with additional publications of the children of William Jay... William, James, Joseph, John, Mary, Rachel, Lydia and David. Some of these are already in the works. It is hoped that one day the combined works will be published in printed format. As for now, we are sharing them with the public on the Jay Family Association website. This is a copyrighted work. Please do not download and publish on any other site like Ancestry.com. That would violate our copyright. Below you are given a citation to use if you desire to quote passages from this work. We hope all will enjoy. Copyright © 2019-2020 by Arthur V. King and Christy L Jay All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form on by an electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review. When quoting brief passages they should be cited as follows: King, Arthur V. and Jay, Christy L. William Jay of Frederick Co. VA. 2019-2020.www.jayfamily.org William Jay of Frederick Co. VA William Jay (ca 1739-1797) William Jay (ca 1739-1797) William Jay (Jr) was likely the first born son of William Jay (Sr.) of Frederick County, Virginia.1 He was born about 1739 on his father’s property on Evitt’s Run in what was originally Orange County, VA. As with most of elder Jay’s older children, there is very little documented concerning their exact years of birth, birth order, and early childhood. There is no oral tradition concerning William’s early days; however, much historic speculation was theorized during the twentieth century. The body of documentary evidence presented in this chapter will substantiate and help the reader understand those statements and hopefully clear-up several misconceptions concerning William Jay Jr. and his family. During his early years, William would have grown up on a small subsistence farm helping his father with the daily chores of a small family residing in the backwoods. Since the Jay property was located on the edge of the settled wilderness, he would have surely come into contact with Native Americans who would occasionally foray into the area. While it is not certain what worship practices the family had during his formative years, it appears that William was taught to read and write as evidenced by his handwritten signature on various documents. Migration to North Carolina Until about 1750/51, William Jr. lived near the Shenandoah River crossing later known as Vestal’s Ferry which lay along the ancient pioneer trail through Vestal’s Gap. However, about that time his father migrated down the Shenandoah Valley on the Great Wagon Road into the Carolinas and settled along the North Flat River in Orange Co. NC just south of current day Roxboro. At age 12, William accompanied the entire family when they permanently migrated south on that multi-week journey. In North Carolina land was more plentiful, easily procured and landowners did not have to deal with the quit rents that were imposed by Lord Fairfax in western Virginia. As a result, this area of settlement was a very popular destination for a multitude of families out of the western frontier of Virginia. Here, William would have come of age hunting, fishing, trapping and farming on his father’s property. In 1755, a tithables list was prepared in Orange Co., NC.2 This particular document is of utmost importance William Jay & Son 1755 Orange Co. NC – Tithables List ©2019 51 William Jay (ca 1739-1797) William Jay of Frederick Co. VA as for the first time it enables the researcher to quantify the age of William Jay Jr. In this enumeration, his father William Sr. was listed as “William Jay & son”. Colonial law specified that any male 16 years or older in the household was to be enumerated and taxed as an adult.3 Certainly William Jay Sr. had absolutely no financial incentive to place anyone on the tithables list that was under age. As a result, it can be conclusively stated that William Jay (Sr) had a son, living in his household that was born no later than 1739… and that son was surely William Jay Jr. Additionally, during that same year, it can be noted that ‘a William Jay’ was received on request at the Cane Creek Monthly Meeting on 2nd (day) of the 8th mo (August) 1755.4 Twentieth century researchers have assumed that this request for membership was for William Jay Sr.; however, it can be documented that William Sr. was specifically enumerated as a Quaker as early as 1749 in Fairfax County, VA.5 As a result, the authors cannot rule out the possibility this membership request could have been for ‘the son’…William Jay, Jr. It is obvious that the Society entry was not explicit and it is impossible to determine the individual who requested membership. It is known that the Jay family lived a two-day ride from the Cane Creek Meeting House and their weekly worship would have taken place in local homes. This type of remote worship was not unusual for the period and the actions of ‘remote’ members were not always documented and did not necessarily filter back to the Meeting House.6 Marriage and Raising a Young Family As with all young men of the period, William Jay would have chosen his wife from the local neighborhood surrounding the North Flat River. In general, this area would have perhaps encompassed a five mile radius. Multiple family traditions and son James’ documentary statements confirm that his first wife was named Elizabeth.7 William and Elizabeth were probably married about 1760.8 Speculation as to Elizabeth’s maiden name has always run rampant. Early researchers have speculated that her maiden name may have been Layton as that name was used as a given name for males in the family for many generations. It can be confirmed that a Layton family received a land grant and did reside in the area near William Jay during the period.9 Thus, the possibility does exist that she could have been a Layton; although, at this time it cannot be proven. It is also assumed that William’s marriage was to a non-Quaker10; however, as a result of their remote location it should not be assumed by the reader that there would be any Quaker documentation condemning him for marrying out of unity. William Jr. began building his personal estate in 1761 when his father conveyed the younger Jay 115 acres near the banks of the North Flat River.11 This deed once again confirms earlier discussion concerning the age/birth year of William Jay, Jr. Colonial law required that a male had to be 21 years old to purchase or sell land12, thus confirming that William Jay was born earlier than previously believed. In 1765 he purchased an additional 375 acres from neighbor Henry Ledbetter. 52 ©2019 William Jay of Frederick Co. VA William Jay (ca 1739-1797) It was during this decade William and Elizabeth Jay began to raise a large family with the birth of six children… Mary (ca 1761), Sarah (ca 1762)13, William (III) (ca 1763), David (1764), James (1766) and Elizabeth (ca 1769). During this 10 year period prior to the struggle for American independence, they lived and farmed the rich soils of the Flat River watershed next to immediate family and in-laws. Politics and Civic Affairs in Orange Co. NC During the run-up to the American Revolution, politics in Orange Co. became turbulent. The Regulator Movement in western NC was in full bloom. While there is no documentation of active Jay family participation in these activities, it is estimated that out of the 8,000 people living in Orange Co. at the time, some six or seven thousand of them were in support of the Regulators.14 Additionally, as will be seen later in this chapter, William Jr’s active support of the American troops during the revolution does document the fact that he was not adverse to taking what might be considered a radical or confrontational political stance. It can be confirmed that the extended Jay family in Orange Co. were civic minded and did have concern regarding local government as well. Like his father and brothers James and Joseph, William Jay Jr. signed the 1771 petition to subdivide Orange Co. into two smaller counties.15 Ironically, the establishment of this new county (Caswell) did not take place until 1777, a few years after William Jr. had already relocated to SC. During this period the family continued to expand with the births of twins Charlotte and Layton (1771) followed by another set of twins, Anne and Deborah (1772).
Recommended publications
  • William Jay of Frederick County Virginia 2019
    To Family History Enthusiasts, This has been years in the making and as such has been a great labor of love. As you may note, this manuscript is laid out in book format and it is the intention of the authors to continue with additional publications of the children of William Jay... William, James, Joseph, John, Mary, Rachel, Lydia and David. Some of these are already in the works. It is hoped that one day the combined works will be published in printed format. As for now, we are sharing them with the public on the Jay Family Association website. This is a copyrighted work. Please do not download and publish on any other site like Ancestry.com. That would violate our copyright. Below you are given a citation to use if you desire to quote passages from this work. We hope all will enjoy. Copyright © 2019 by Arthur V. King and Christy L Jay All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form on by an electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review. When quoting brief passages they should be cited as follows: King, Arthur V. and Jay, Christy L. William Jay of Frederick Co. VA. 2019. www.jayfamily.org William Jay of Frederick Co. VA______ Introduction Introduction The Purpose The intent of this book is to document and explore the life and times of William Jay ca (1711-1773) who migrated out of Frederick County Virginia ca 1751 with his family.
    [Show full text]
  • The Selected Papers of John Jay, 1760-1779 Volume 1 Index
    The Selected Papers of John Jay, 1760-1779 Volume 1 Index References to earlier volumes are indicated by the volume number followed by a colon and page number (for example, 1:753). Achilles: references to, 323 Active (ship): case of, 297 Act of 18 April 1780: impact of, 70, 70n5 Act of 18 March 1780: defense of, by John Adams, 420; failure of, 494–95; impact of, 70, 70n5, 254, 256, 273n10, 293, 298n2, 328, 420; passage of, 59, 60n2, 96, 178, 179n1 Adams, John, 16, 223; attitude toward France, 255; and bills of exchange, 204n1, 273– 74n10, 369, 488n3, 666; and British peace overtures, 133, 778; charges against Gillon, 749; codes and ciphers used by, 7, 9, 11–12; and commercial regulations, 393; and commercial treaties, 645, 778; commissions to, 291n7, 466–67, 467–69, 502, 538, 641, 643, 645; consultation with, 681; correspondence of, 133, 176, 204, 393, 396, 458, 502, 660, 667, 668, 786n11; criticism of, 315, 612, 724; defends act of 18 March 1780, 420; documents sent to, 609, 610n2; and Dutch loans, 198, 291n7, 311, 382, 397, 425, 439, 677, 728n6; and enlargement of peace commission, 545n2; expenses of, 667, 687; French opposition to, 427n6; health of, 545; identified, 801; instructions to, 152, 469–71, 470–71n2, 502, 538, 641, 643, 657; letters from, 115–16, 117–18, 410–11, 640–41, 643–44, 695–96; letters to, 87–89, 141–43, 209–10, 397, 640, 657, 705–6; and marine prisoners, 536; and mediation proposals, 545, 545n2; as minister to England, 11; as minister to United Provinces, 169, 425; mission to Holland, 222, 290, 291n7, 300, 383, 439,
    [Show full text]
  • ITS IMPORTANCE in NEW YORK MED ICINE* PAUL CUSHMAN, JR. T HE Kissams Were a Large and Prominent Family In
    689 THE KISSAM FAMILY: ITS IMPORTANCE IN NEW YORK MED ICINE* PAUL CUSHMAN, JR. Department of Internal Medicine St. Luke's Hospital Center New York, N. Y. T HE Kissams were a large and prominent family in New York City during most of the I8th and I9th centuries. Although especially eminent in commerce and in law, they also played a number of interest- ing roles in the history of American medicine.' This communication will present some of the most noteworthy contributions which the early members of the family made either to the development of medical practice or to the evolution of medical institutions. The family has been traced to John Ockasson who arrived in Cow Neck, Long Island (Now Manhasset-Great Neck), in the late I7th century. Since he spelled his surname in a variety of ways-about I8 different versions are recognized in real estate documents2-it is im- probable that his origins will ever be established. His son, Daniel, succeeded to the family farm and established the "Kissam" spelling of the surname. In eight generations that followed (see accompanying figure) 27 descendants of Daniel either practiced medicine or set out to do so by entering school. Of these, all but three bore the surname Kissam. Twenty-two members of the family actually practiced medicine. The accumulation of such a large number of physicians in one family is unique in American medicine to my knowledge. Further, the tendency of the medical Kissams to concentrate in the New York City area is remarkable. Seventeen Kissams were actively engaged in the practice of medicine at one time or another in the New York City area.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Wallpaper Fragment C. 1820-1830 Materials: Cotton Paper, Ink American
    Historic Wallpaper Fragment c. 1820-1830 Materials: Cotton paper, ink American During the restoration of the Homestead in the 1960s, wallpapers dating to the first quarter of the nineteenth century were found in the Library. Four layers of wallpaper were discovered behind the earliest of the built-in bookcases, which is on the east wall. According to curator Lewis C. Rubenstein, the papers were obtained by cutting a hole in the wall from the other side (in the service hall) and removing a complete cross-section of plaster without disturbing the bookcase. The bottom layer of paper (c. 1801) is a green and white leaf pattern, which has been reproduced and installed in the Front Parlor. The second paper (c. 1805-1815), is the yellow and white hop flower pattern that is currently reproduced in the Dining Room. The third layer (c. 1810-1825) is a stylized pineapple or pine cone pattern printed in ochre, black, and white and is reproduced in the Hall. This top layer is a pillar print with an elaborate floral and foliate motif in black and green on a yellow ground; it can still be seen through cracks in wall behind the bookcase. All of the wallpapers are block-printed on sheets of paper that are made up of squares pasted together to form long strips. The section that was removed by the curator can be definitively dated to John Jay’s period of residence because there is a pencil inscription on one of the layers. On the underside of the top layer of paper, a pencil inscription reads: "John Jay, Esq./ Bedford" and "...Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Livingston Jay, 1756--1802: Dynamics of Power, Privilege and Prestige in the Revolutionary Era
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 Sarah Livingston Jay, 1756--1802: Dynamics of power, privilege and prestige in the Revolutionary era Jennifer Megan Janson West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Janson, Jennifer Megan, "Sarah Livingston Jay, 1756--1802: Dynamics of power, privilege and prestige in the Revolutionary era" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 797. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/797 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sarah Livingston Jay, 1756-1802: Dynamics of Power, Privilege and Prestige in the Revolutionary Era Jennifer Megan Janson Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Colonial and Revolutionary History Robert Blobaum, Ph.D., Department Chair Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Committee Chair Ken Fones-Wolf, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin and Jay
    Franklin and Jay Imagine being in the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia on May 10, 1775, as the delegates of the Second Continental Congress gathered! So much had happened in recent months: the British Parliament had declared Massachusetts in a state of rebellion; Patrick Henry had delivered his stirring “Give me Liberty” speech; Paul Revere had taken his famous ride; and, on April 19, the Battles of Lexington and Concord had been fought, ending in the British retreat to Boston. The “extreme Urgency of the Business” (as William Livingston put it) saw the return of many of the members of the First Congress, men who had traveled many days over dusty, rutted roads to attend, leaving the comforts of home, staying in flea-ridden boarding houses unless they were lucky enough to be invited to stay with friends. Among the returnees were John and Samuel Adams, Richard H. Lee, John Dickinson, George Washington, and John Jay. New to the Congress was a man recently returned from England where he had resided many years, at first highly lauded, but more recently humiliated: Benjamin Franklin. While in England, his efforts on behalf of the American colonies had yielded only disappointment and failure. Now nearly 70, Franklin had lost his favorable view of the Mother Country. Congress quickly set to work; many committees were created, among them one to draft a petition to King George III. Appointed were John Dickinson and Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania, John Jay of New York, Thomas Johnson of Maryland, and John Rutledge of South Carolina—all moderates. Franklin was the oldest, famous as a self-made man, author, scientist, and wit; Jay the youngest, known as a hard-working lawyer and a fine writer.
    [Show full text]
  • The 3 U.S. Infantry During the Civil
    The 3rd U.S. Infantry During the Civil War Ryan Quint. Table of Contents Introduction 2 Before the War: A Brief Introduction of the 3rd in the Antebellum Period 3 The War Starts 3 First Bull Run (Manassas) 5 The Peninsula and Seven Days 12 Second Bull Run (2nd Manassas) 21 Antietam 27 Fredericksburg 30 Chancellorsville 36 Gettysburg 41 New York 48 Bristoe Station, Rappahannock Station, and Mine Run 50 New York, Washington, and the end 54 Works Cited 57 Appendix I: Casualties 61 Appendix II- Bull Run 62 Appendix III- Seven Days 67 Appendix IV- Second Bull Run 77 Appendix V- Antietam 84 Appendix VI- Fredericksburg 88 Appendix VII- Chancellorsville 93 Appendix VIII- Gettysburg 98 Appendix IX- Rappahannock Station 106 Appendix X- Mine Run 108 1 Introduction It is my goal that this manual will be a quick-reference guide to names, dates, and locations having to do with the 3rd U.S. Regulars. This manual is by no means inclusive, and I welcome others’ suggestions. This manual will include battle maps, and photographs of key participants to do with the Regulars. At the end there will be a series of appendices that contain casualties and reports filed by individuals later contained in the Official Records of the War of Rebellion. There is a works cited, which also doubles as a suggested reading for those who wish to know more. I hope that this manual is helpful to any and all who wish to know more about the 3rd U.S. Buffsticks! -Ryan Quint Fredericksburg, 2013 2 Before the War: A Brief History of the 3rd in the antebellum period The 3rd U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Verley Archer Papers
    Verley Archer Collection 1960’s - 1980’s Collection Number: MSS 254 Size: 8.76 linear feet Special Collections and University Archives Jean and Alexander Heard Library Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee © Vanderbilt University Special Collections and University Archives Verley Archer Collection Scope and Content Note The Verley Archer Collection consists of materials relating to the Vanderbilt Family Reunion held in conjunction with the Centennial Celebration of Vanderbilt University, March 16-17, 1973. Ms. Archer conducted extensive research into the genealogy of the Vanderbilt family and located descendants of Commodore Cornelius Vanderbilt living in 1973. Included in the Verley Archer Collection are research notes and materials, completed questionnaires from family members, correspondence, publicity materials, and published books, all relating to the Family Reunion and Centennial Celebration. The 21 boxes in this collection cover approximately 8.76 linear feet. The collection is arranged in 3 series: Subject Files (Series 1); Vanderbilt Centennial (series 2); and Verley Archer’s Research Materials (Series 3). The Subject Files, Series 1, are the most extensive part of this collection. They consist of letters, completed questionnaires, and biographical information on most of the over 500 members of the Vanderbilt family living in 1973, as well as some earlier family members. These are arranged alphabetically by last name. Married women descendants are cross-referenced by their maiden names. Series 2 consists of the form letter mailings sent to his Vanderbilt relatives by William H. Vanderbilt, III and their responses. Also included are publicity articles about the Vanderbilt Family Reunion and Vanderbilt University Centennial. There are lists of descendants attending the Reunion and of gifts to Vanderbilt University from the descendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Children of John and Sarah Livingston
    A Founding Family Confronts Multiple Disabilities Large scale editions of the writings of Founding Fathers and other “Great White Men” in Early American History are often associated with contributions only to traditional fields of history, and not with the newer forms of social history. But in fact because the publications and the larger collections on which they draw are so comprehensive, and include private as well as public papers, they can and often have made contributions to many other aspects of history. Standard academic procedures often don’t call attention to such hidden topics. Reviews generally don’t refer to them. Indexes may not highlight them. The finding aids to the archival collections may not note them. As editions increasingly are placed online and become searchable some of these problems may be overcome. Health conditions are one of the most common items mentioned in Early American correspondence and diaries, and references useful to the history of disabilities can sometimes be found. Such is the case with The Papers of John Jay, based on original manuscripts in the Rare Book and Manuscript Room of the Columbia University Libraries and photocopies assembled from repositories around the world. New York Founding Father John Jay (1745-1829), was the sixth of seven surviving children of Peter Jay (1704-82) and Mary Van Cortlandt Jay (1705-77). Four of his older siblings were inflicted in varying degrees by disabilities. As editors of the Jay Papers we have primarily been interested in how this family circumstance affected Jay’s life, personality, and character, and how it affected family dynamics generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolitionists Were Bullied from a Case Study Christian Philanthropists in Britain the Moment They First Stuck Their and America Got Deeply Involved Heads Up
    here have been principled Leaders of the charity brilliantly objections to slavery for orchestrated massive shifts in Tas long as there has been public sentiment. slavery—which is to say, from the first days of human history. Organizing culture change But hatred of enslavement didn’t Culture change is not for cowards, become a mass conviction until and abolitionists were bullied from A case study Christian philanthropists in Britain the moment they first stuck their and America got deeply involved heads up. Changing Society through Civil Action in popular campaigns to expose As part of their broader effort to slavery as an ugly, immoral, and refine Americans through worship, sinful activity, utterly incompatible education, discussion, and service, with life in a free land. This was Arthur and Lewis Tappan had in demanding and dangerous work 1832 leased a tatterdemalion old that required guile, endurance, theater in lower Manhattan and commitment, courage, managerial converted it into a church. The genius, and money. The movement building “squatted in the midst 64 got all of these things from leaders of the slums” next to Five Points, Abolition like Arthur and Lewis Tappan. a neighborhood notorious for Fired by their deep evangelical its gangs and grog shops. During Christian convictions, the Tappan recent years the theater had been brothers were leading providers of home to a circus, and with his strategy and funding to the cause sharp nose for drama and public of abolishing slavery. (They also interest, Lewis noted that “the powered many other important sensation produced by converting social reforms. For some biography the place with slight alterations on the men, see the last third of into a church will be very great, the case study on the Second Great and curiousity will be excited.” Awakening.) Arthur was the lead The Tappans placed their funder and visionary, and Lewis the Chatham Street Chapel at the vital organizer, behind creation of disposal of Charles Grandison the American Anti-Slavery Society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colonel by Marcus R. Cimino for Generations, Chief Justice John Jay
    The Colonel By Marcus R. Cimino For generations, Chief Justice John Jay and his descendants fought tooth and nail to abolish slavery in the United States. Jay’s son Peter Augustus Jay, and his youngest son William Jay, both were publicly and ideologically opposed to slavery. When America the Civil War began, Colonel William Jay (also known as “the Colonel”) represented the Jay’s honorably; not only in his civic duties, but also to finish what his ancestors started, and rid the nation of slavery once and for all. The Jay’s estate in the Hudson Valley, which had been passed down for five generations, tells a tale of some of the less recognized of John Jay’s descendants, among them is the Chief Justice’s grandson Colonel William Jay. “The Colonel” is an illusive character, and documentation on his life is hard to come by, but the historians in charge of the Jay’s estate at Bedford compiled as much as they could on the Colonel through letters and archives, telling the tale of a life that seemed affluent, as well as fortified by the generational success of his ancestors. Although Jay was blessed with his family’s legacy, and justly earned his rank in the military, his immediate family was devastated by illness and death at a time when medicine and physicians lacked behind the advancement of the rest of post-Civil War America. Colonel William Jay embraced the Jay tradition of public servitude, family values, and the overall end of slavery. Unlike his ancestors, William witnessed the abolition of slavery via the thirteenth amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Veople and Social Incidents
    TUESDAY. JULY 14, 1908. 6 IST3W-YORK DAILY TRIBUNE. not be left to take or, respectable to be contaminated should fairly satisfactory. But not flunkies, a dance hall two .with Veople and Social some counties itIs could not bring this the initiative himself. About Incidents Amusements. every county in the state has such a sheriff as orchestras arid dress rules sher- calamity. If, though, Zoo-Hoo, the Assyrian Essex possesses. What isneeded is that the Van<l»'rhiit. Paul Rainey, Payne Whitney, " AERIAL. GARDEX—*:?<\u25a0»— Merry Widow. police "got busy" nnd .Metaphysician, and Iludhud. the Invincible "LEST WE FORGET." NEW YORK SOCIETY. Rak_« in Full. ifTs M "ell as the should Gdelet. \u25a0 I- Breckman and Pet<»r F. CcH« ;* ASTOR—S:3o— raid don't, somebody Palmist, should bo comfortably housed under a reported three d-^tlis BRIGHTON BEACH—— Pain's Firewrks. do their duty. or. if they that Y.-sterdny's ne\vs|.M P.r accompanied by her fred G. Vanderbilt will be back in *tnwsi.| World. roof, along with Idaho Alfred G. * CASINO——":Is The Mimic an instru- reputable and rainproof tetanus a few hours at two hos- Mrs. Vanderbilt. the first game. *#***'r CIRCLE R:ls The Mrrry <;\u25a0->- should get after them with effective from within Ormond French, ff — Gallery and Melanchtbon Ma- beinX son and her mother. Mrs. Francis COXEV —ISLAND—— Luna Park Dreamland. We are inclined to think Ike's Shooting pitals in nearby New Jersey, the victims P. Wagstaff. Mrs. Robert Goelet and her son. Robert ~W «_ 8:15 Girls.
    [Show full text]