DOCSLIB.ORG

Foraging Ecology and Depredation Impact of Scaup on Commercial Baitfish and Sportfish Farms in Eastern Arkansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foraging Ecology and Depredation Impact of Scaup on Commercial Baitfish and Sportfish Farms in Eastern Arkansas Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 8-9-2019 Foraging ecology and depredation impact of scaup on commercial baitfish and sportfish farms in eastern Arkansas Stephen Clements Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Clements, Stephen, "Foraging ecology and depredation impact of scaup on commercial baitfish and sportfish farms in eastern Arkansas" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 2319. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/2319 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Template B v3.0 (beta): Created by J. Nail 06/2015 Foraging ecology and depredation impact of scaup on commercial baitfish and sportfish farms in eastern Arkansas By TITLE PAGE Stephen Andrew Clements A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture in the Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Mississippi State, Mississippi August 2019 Copyright by COPYRIGHT PAGE Stephen Andrew Clements 2019 Foraging ecology and depredation impact of scaup on commercial baitfish and sportfish farms in eastern Arkansas By APPROVAL PAGE Stephen Andrew Clements Approved: ____________________________________ J. Brian Davis (Major Professor/Co-Thesis Director) ____________________________________ Brian S. Dorr (Co-Thesis Director) ____________________________________ Scott A. Rush (Committee Member) ____________________________________ Kevin M. Hunt (Graduate Coordinator) ____________________________________ George M. Hopper Dean College of Forest Resources Name: Stephen Andrew Clements ABSTRACT Date of Degree: August 9, 2019 Institution: Mississippi State University Major Field: Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Major Professor: J. Brian Davis Title of Study: Foraging ecology and depredation impact of scaup on commercial baitfish and sportfish farms in eastern Arkansas Pages in Study 93 Candidate for Degree of Master of Science Scaup (Aythya spp.) are suspected of consuming substantial quantities of fish from Arkansas commercial baitfish and sportfish farms. We investigated the foraging ecology and depredation impact of scaup on farms by surveying ponds and collecting scaup during two autumn-winters (2016-2018) in Arkansas. Scaup abundance and fish they consumed were highly variable between winters. More scaup were present and they ate more fish during the second winter (2017-2018) than the previous winter. In the second year, there were an estimated 874,941 scaup use-days and 18% of Lesser Scaup diet was fish. We found that scaup use of ponds was more likely in colder winters and on larger Golden Shiner, Fathead Minnow, and Lepomis spp. ponds stocked at high densities. These results will inform stakeholders on the extent of losses of fish to these birds, and methods to efficiently allocate resources for timely harassment of scaup from fish ponds. DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my parents, Connie and Chris Clements, for introducing me to the outdoors and encouraging me to pursue my dreams. My experiences with each of you at the beach, on the boat, or in the woods are my most memorable and have undoubtedly inspired my journey. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank the Southern Regional Aquaculture Center. Funding was provided in part by the Southern Regional Aquaculture Center through Grant number 2016-38500-25752 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture. A special thanks goes out to Dr. Luke Roy for envisioning this project and getting it underway. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Carole Engle, Dr. Anita Kelly, and Katie Hanson-Dorr for their roles in this projects completion. The advice and wisdom that each of you provided during this research was integral to its success. Furthermore, I thank the USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center-Mississippi Field Station for providing staff, vehicles, and a host of other supplies that made the completion of this study possible. Thank you to the UDSA/APHIS Wildlife Services in Arkansas for their assistance in bird collections and facilitating contact with producers. A special thanks goes out to the bait- and sportfish producers of Arkansas that allowed us access to their facilities and generously provided us with the information needed to complete analysis. I am forever grateful for my advisors, Dr. Brian Davis and Dr. Brian Dorr, for providing me with this opportunity to enhance my education. During my time at Mississippi State, each of you have helped me become a better scientist, writer, and presenter. I have thoroughly enjoyed working as a graduate student for each of you and whether it be professional endeavors, tailgates, or time in the outdoors, I look forward to iii our future collaboration. I would also like to thank my third committee member, Dr. Scott Rush, for his advice and contributions to my thesis. I am also thankful for the Thomas A. Plein Foundation for awarding me with a scholarship during my time at Mississippi State University. To fellow graduate students, Paul Burr, Terrel Christie, and Joe Lancaster, thank you for your friendship and assistance throughout this experience. I would likely still be deliberating over minute details of my thesis without your advice. Thank you to the NWRC Technicians, Alex Crain, Lanna Durst, and Raleigh Middleton, for the long hours and hard work that you provided in all aspects of this research. I would also like to thank other technicians and student workers, Carley Cofield, Taylor Hackemack, Lyndsey Kowalczyk, Ryan Mann, Ali Marchant, Deja Perkins, and Laurel Riebock, for their efforts in the field and lab. To the College of Forest Resources graduate student community, thank you for making my experience at Mississippi State so enjoyable. I am thankful for the diverse friendships I have gained through our crawfish boils, tailgates, outdoor adventures, and late nights supporting local businesses. Most importantly, thank you to my parents for equipping me with the drive and work ethic to succeed. Your continued love and support has made this process manageable. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER I. ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE OF BAIT- AND SPORTFISH CONSUMED ANNUALLY BY SCAUP WINTERING IN EASTERN ARKANSAS ..........................................................................1 Abstract ..................................................................................................................1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................2 Materials and Methods ..........................................................................................5 Study Area .......................................................................................................5 Pond Survey Design ........................................................................................6 Field Sampling Procedures ..............................................................................6 Scaup Collections ............................................................................................7 Statistical Analysis ..........................................................................................9 Results .................................................................................................................12 Abundance and Distribution ..........................................................................12 Scaup Diets ....................................................................................................13 Scaup Depredation of Fish ............................................................................13 Discussion ............................................................................................................14 References ...........................................................................................................35 II. DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF SCAUP USING BAITFISH AND SPORTFISH FARMS IN EASTERN ARKANSAS ....................39 Abstract ................................................................................................................39 Introduction .........................................................................................................40 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................42 Study Area .....................................................................................................42 Pond Survey Design ......................................................................................43 Field Sampling Procedures ............................................................................43
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Red Names=Invasive Species Green Names=Native Species
    CURLY-LEAF PONDWEED EURASIAN WATERMIL- FANWORT CHARA (Potamogeton crispus) FOIL (Cabomba caroliniana) (Chara spp.) This undesirable exotic, also known (Myriophyllum spicatum) This submerged exotic Chara is typically found growing in species is not common as Crisp Pondweed, bears a waxy An aggressive plant, this exotic clear, hard water. Lacking true but management tools are cuticle on its upper leaves making milfoil can grow nearly 10 feet stems and leaves, Chara is actually a limited. Very similar to them stiff and somewhat brittle. in length forming dense mats form of algae. It’s stems are hollow aquarium species. Leaves The leaves have been described as at the waters surface. Grow- with leaf-like structures in a whorled are divided into fine resembling lasagna noodles, but ing in muck, sand, or rock, it pattern. It may be found growing branches in a fan-like ap- upon close inspection a row of has become a nuisance plant with tiny, orange fruiting bodies on pearance, opposite struc- “teeth” can be seen to line the mar- in many lakes and ponds by the branches called akinetes. Thick ture, spanning 2 inches. gins. Growing in dense mats near quickly outcompeting native masses of Chara can form in some Floating leaves are small, the water’s surface, it outcompetes species. Identifying features areas. Often confused with Starry diamond shape with a native plants for sun and space very include a pattern of 4 leaves stonewort, Coontail or Milfoils, it emergent white/pinkish early in spring. By midsummer, whorled around a hollow can be identified by a gritty texture flower.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioone? RESEARCH
    RESEARCH BioOne? EVOLVED Proximate Nutrient Analyses of Four Species of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Consumed by Florida Manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) Compared to Romaine Lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. longifolia) Author(s): Jessica L. Siegal-Willott, D.V.M., Dipl. A.C.Z.M., Kendal Harr, D.V.M., M.S., Dipl. A.C.V.P., Lee-Ann C. Hayek, Ph.D., Karen C. Scott, Ph.D., Trevor Gerlach, B.S., Paul Sirois, M.S., Mike Renter, B.S., David W. Crewz, M.S., and Richard C. Hill, M.A., Vet.M.B., Ph.D., M.R.C.V.S. Source: Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 41(4):594-602. 2010. Published By: American Association of Zoo Veterinarians DOI: 10.1638/2009-0118.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1638/2009-0118.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is an electronic aggregator of bioscience research content, and the online home to over 160 journals and books published by not-for-profit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne's Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms of use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Rice-Fields. the Relevance of Cyanobacteria in the Ecosystem
    Limnetica 23(1-2) 11/10/04 10:15 Página 95 95 A shallow water ecosystem: rice-fields. The relevance of cyanobacteria in the ecosystem. Eduardo Fernández-Valiente* and Antonio Quesada Departamento de Biología. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain * Corresponding author, tel: 34-914978186, fax: 34-914978344, email: [email protected] ABSTRACT In this paper we review the knowledge of the ecology of the largest freshwater ecosystem on Earth: the rice-fields, and in particular the rice-fields from Valencia (Spain) making a special consideration to the cyanobacteria present in this ecosystem. Rice-fields are artificial shallow aquatic ecosystems in which the land management and the agricultural practices together with the rice plant growth govern the major environmental variables affecting the aquatic biota and its relationships. Primary producers are dominated typically by macrophytic algae as Chara and cyanobacteria, both planktonic and benthic (beside the rice plants). Most rice-fields can be considered nutrient replete, since the fertilization inputs and the low ratio volume/surface make that main nutrients are typically available. Under these circumstances other environmental variables as photosynthetically active radiation availability or filtration rates and predation may explain the growth limitation of primary producers. Irradiance availability identify two periods within the cultivation cycle: when plants are short, irradiance is not limiting and some water chemistry variables (as pH, oxygen and dissolved inorganic C concentrations) change drastically as a function of the primary production; when plants are large and the canopy is intense, then irradiance is limiting and the water chemistry changes only slightly along the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of the Antillean Manatee
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NSU Works Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Theses and Dissertations HCNSO Student Work 1-1-2014 Diet of the Antillean Manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) in Belize, Central America Aarin Conrad Allen Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center, [email protected] This document is a product of extensive research conducted at the Nova Southeastern University Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography. For more information on research and degree programs at the NSU Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, please click here. Follow this and additional works at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd Part of the Marine Biology Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Aarin Conrad Allen. 2014. Diet of the Antillean Manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) in Belize, Central America. Master's thesis. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, Oceanographic Center. (9) http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/9. This Thesis is brought to you by the HCNSO Student Work at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY OCEANOGRAPHIC CENTER Diet of the Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) in Belize, Central America by Aarin Conrad Allen Submitted to the Faculty of Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a specialty in: Marine Biology Nova Southeastern University 2014 2 Thesis of Aarin Conrad Allen Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science: Marine Biology Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center April 2014 Approved: Thesis Committee Major Professor :______________________________ James D.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Biology of Some Turbellaria from the Mississippi Basin
    r MORPHOLOGY AND BIOLOGY OF SOME TURBELLARIA FROM THE MISSISSIPPI BASIN WITH THREE PLATES THESIS S1IllMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ZOOLOGY IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1917 BY RUTH HIGLEY A. B. Grinnell College, 1911 I ContributioD3 from the Zoological Labor&toty o[ the Univenlty of Dlinois under the direction ofHC!l1Y B. Ward, No. 112 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ,.......................................... 7 Technique ,.......... 9 Methods of Study ,.......... 10 Biology , '. 12 Types of Localities ,................................... 12 Reactions of Worms ,............................................... 17 Morphology , , .. ",............ 22 Family Planariidae............................... 22 Planaria velaJa Stringer 1909............................. 22 Planoria maculata Leidy 1847......................... 23 Planaria lrumata Leidy 1851........................... 24 Family Catenulidae ,,,,, 25 Stenostrmro lew;ops (Ant. Duges) 1828 .. 26 Slcnostrmro tenuuauaa von Graff 1911.. 30 Stenostrmro giganteum nov. spec .. 30 Reprinted from the Stcnostrmro glandi(erum nov. spec . 35 lllinois Biological Monographs Volume 4, number 2, pages 195-288 Family Microstomidae......... .. ... 37 without changes in text or Murostoma cauaatum Leidy 1852 . 38 illustrations Macrostrmro sensitirJUm Silliman 1884 . 39 Macrostrmro album nov. spec ... 39 Family Prorhynchidae , .. 42 Prorhynchus stagna/is M. Schultze 1851.. .. 43 Prorltymh'" applana/us Kennel 1888 , .. 44
    [Show full text]
  • Irgc News 28
    IRGC NEWS INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH GROUP ON CHAROPHYTES ISSN 1834-6030 Edited by: K. Torn, S. Schneider, A. Pukacz and E. Nat 28 March 2017 CONTENTS Editorial 1 Images collection 21 New executive commitee 2 Announcement 21 In Memoriam 2 PhD thesis completion 22 Welcome to New Members 5 Forthcoming meetings 26 Minutes of the General Assembly 2016 5 Charophyte discussion forum 27 Report on past meetings 8 New IRGC homepage 28 Publication of the proceedings 7th IRGC, Astana 15 Charophytes on the web 28 Call for participation 15 Membership fees 29 Special issue: Botanica Serbica 15 E-mail addresses of IRGC members 30 Reference article 16 Address list of members 31 Report introduction 21 Group photograph 7th IRGC, Astana 36 EDITORIAL Another year has passed, and our small but very active organization has contributed with a number of exciting activities. Not at least, the 7th IRGC symposium was held in Astana, Kazakhstan. I thank the organizing committee, namely Aizhan Zhamangara, Raikhan Beisenova, Sherim Tulegenov, Leyla Akbayeva and Saida Nigmatova, for their excellent work, and the hosting institution, the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, for their hospitality. Please find the reports of the meeting in this issue of the IRGC-news; for all those who could not participate, the reports are an excellent chance to get up-to-date with the activities at the meeting, and for all others they are a wonderful op- portunity to remember the scientific exchange, the hardships of the weather, and the very nice talks with friends and colleagues. At the meeting, a new Executive Committee was elected, and I thank all voting members for the confidence placed in the new Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Chara-Nitella.Pdf
    A WEED REPORT from the book Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States This WEED REPORT does not constitute a formal recommendation. When using herbicides always read the label, and when in doubt consult your farm advisor or county agent. This WEED REPORT is an excerpt from the book Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States and is available wholesale through the UC Weed Research & Information Center (wric.ucdavis.edu) or retail through the Western Society of Weed Science (wsweedscience.org) or the California Invasive Species Council (cal-ipc.org). Chara spp. and Nitella spp. Chara sp. Chara and nitella Family: Characeae Range: Throughout North America. Habitat: Ponds, lakes, reservoirs, rivers, streams, bogs, canals, and rice fields. Some species inhabit brackish water. Chara often grows in hard water. Nitella sp. Origin: All species are native to North America. Impacts: Chara and nitella provide food and cover for wildlife and are important components of natural aquatic ecosystems. These algae sometimes grow in rice fields and canals, but are rarely of importance as weeds. At first glance, chara and nitella are easily mistaken for vascular aquatic plants. These submerged plant-like green algae are usually anchored to the substrate by well-developed, colorless Nitella sp. rhizoids. There are several species that occur in various regions of the western United States. Central axes of chara and nitella are regularly jointed, solid between nodes, with whorls of branches at each node, to 12 inches long or more. These algae do not have leaves. Chara species are typically coarse, gray-green, sometimes encrusted with carbonates, making plants rough to touch, and often have a garlic or skunk-like odor.
    [Show full text]
  • Chara Drouetii R.D
    ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) © 2011 Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely available at www.checklist.org.br Journal of species lists and distribution N Charophyceae, Charales, Characeae, Chara drouetii R.D. Wood, 1965: First record from the state of Quintana Roo, ISTRIBUTIO Mexico D * RAPHIC Mitchell S. Alix and Robin W. Scribailo G EO G N Purdue University North Central, Department of Biology, 1401 South Highway 421, Westville, IN, United States 46391. O * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] OTES N Abstract: Chara drouetii Roo, Mexico. This report extends R.D. Wood, the range 1965 of wasChara recently drouetii collected by approximately during floristic 300 km surveys east of ofthe aquatic nearest macrophytes known occurrence in the ofYucatán this species Peninsula, in Mexico Mexico. and This approximately discovery represents 6,000 km the northwest first documented of the type record locality for this (municipality species from ofthe Fortaleza, state of Quintana state of Ceará, Brazil). Comparative morphometric data on diagnostic taxonomic characters of this species are presented. The genus Chara Linnaeus, 1753 comprises a diverse 23 km north of Manuel, state of Tamaulipas, collected by and complex group of macrophytic green algae that Jeremy D. Pickett-Heaps (collection date absent), United occurs on every continent, excluding Antarctica, (Wood States National Herbarium, US TAMPS-14. It is one of an and Imahori 1959; Wood 1964; 1965; Mann et al. 1999; estimated 17 Chara species found in Mexico (Scribailo Martin et al. 2004). Members of this genus are found in a and Alix 2010). In this paper, we present an additional variety of natural and man-made aquatic habitats, which Chara drouetii from a wetland include fresh and brackish water systems, permanent lakes and ponds, rivers and streams, swales and ditches, fromconfirmed the state occurrence of Quintana of Roo, Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Fates of the Chloroplast Tufa Gene Following Its Transfer to the Nucleus in Green Algae
    Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 87, pp. 5317-5321, July 1990 Evolution Different fates of the chloroplast tufA gene following its transfer to the nucleus in green algae (elongation factor Tu/gene transfer/organelle genomes/gene duplication/multigene family) SANDRA L. BALDAUF*, JAMES R. MANHARTt, AND JEFFREY D. PALMER* *Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; and tDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 Communicated by David L. Dilcher, May 8, 1990 (receivedfor review March 23, 1990) ABSTRACT Previous work suggested that the tufA gene, by a combination offilter hybridization and gene sequencing. encoding protein synthesis elongation factor Tu, was trans- Among the Charophyceae, an unusual chloroplast tufAl was ferred from the chloroplast to the nucleus within the green algal found in the genus Coleochaete, the proposed sister group to lineage giving rise to land plants. In this report we investigate land plants (10, 11). the timing and mode of transfer by examining chloroplast and nuclear DNA from the three major classes of green algae, with MATERIALS AND METHODS emphasis on the class Charophyceae, the proposed sister group Filaments of Spirogyra maxima and Sirogonium melanospo- to land plants. Filter hybridizations reveal a chloroplast tufA rum were obtained from unialgal cultures grown in soil/water gene in all Ulvophyceae and Chlorophyceae and in some but not medium (12) on a 16:8 hr light: dark cycle at 200C ± 20C under all Charophyceae. One charophycean alga, Coleochaete orbic- fluorescent light at an illumination of 50 gmol m-2'so1. Ni- ularis, is shown to contain an intact but highly divergent tella translucens and Chara connivens were grown in aquaria chloroplast tufA gene, whose product is predicted to be non- in a soil/water solution in a greenhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to Common Species of Stonewort
    KEY TO COMMON SPECIES OF STONEWORT 7 Spines sticking out from the stem, inclined more or less towards the centre of the internode, acute-tipped; (cortex even in width or with spine-bearing rows This key covers over 99% of stoneworts encountered in Britain and Ireland. Species narrower than those between) Chara hispida not included are Red Data Book or "near threatened". An asterisk indicates that a Spines appressed to stem with two of the three spines (not usually more than binocular microscope is normally required. A x20 hand lens is recommended for three) more or less pointing in opposite direction up and down the stem (in other characters. youngest, not fully expanded internodes the density of spines may push them in various directions), obtuse to acute-tipped; (spine-bearing rows much narrower 1 Main stem corticate, often spiny 2 than those between so that spines appear to be in furrows of stem) Chara rudis Main stem without cortex 8 (Non-corticate species have semi-translucent stems, like looking through a green 8 Branchlets apparently unbranched, but many with a minute tuft of 1-3 celled bottle; corticate species have more opaque stems with stripes of cells running branches at the ends, visible under a hand lens; plant robust (stem 1-3 mm down them.) diameter and internodes up to 10 cm long), translucent, usually more or less yellowish-green Nitella translucens 2 Spines and stipulodes well-developed and acute-tipped 4 Many branchlets conspicuously branched; plant slender to robust, usually grey- Spines, and usually stipulodes blunt-tipped or undeveloped 3 green, mid to dark green or black 9 (Spines are found on the main stem (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • T.Y.B.Sc. Botany Revised Syllabus Semester III
    SAVITRIBAI PHULE UNIVERSITY OF PUNE T. Y. B. Sc. Botany Revised Syllabus Theory Courses New Syllabus to be implemented from June 2015 Paper Course Semester III Course Semester IV I BO. 331 Cryptogamic Botany BO.341 Plant Physiology and Biochemistry II BO. 332 Cell and Molecular Biology BO.342 Plant Ecology and Biodiversity III BO. 333 Genetics and Evolution BO.343 Plant Pathology IV BO. 334 Spermatophyta and BO.344 Medicinal and Palaeobotany Economic Botany V BO. 335 Horticulture and BO.345 Plant Biotechnology Flo riculture VI BO. 336 Computational Botany BO.346 Plant Breeding and Seed Technology Practical Based on theory Courses Practical No Course Practicals Based on BO.331: Cryptogamic Botany Practical I BO.347 BO. 332: Cell and Molecular Biology BO.341: Plant Physiology & Biochemistry BO.345: Plant Biotechnology BO.333: Genetics and Evolution Practical II BO.348 BO.334: Spermatophyta and Palaeoboatny BO.342: Plant Ecology and Biodiversity BO.346: Plant Breeding and Seed tech nology BO.335: Horticulture and Floriculture Practical III BO.349 BO.336: Computational Botany BO343: Plant Pathology BO.344: Medicinal and Economic Botany Equivalence of the T.Y.B.Sc. Botany Revised Syllabus Semester III Theory Courses New Syllabus to be implemented from June 2015 Paper Course Semester III (New Course Semester III ( Old Syllabus) Syllabus) I BO. 331 Cryptogamic Botany BO. 331 Algae, Fungi and Bryophytes II BO. 332 Cell and Molecular BO. 332 Molecular Biology Biology III BO. 333 Genetics and Evolution BO. 333 Angiosperms and Evolution IV BO. 334 Spermatophyta and BO. 334 Genetics and Plant Palaeoboatny Breeding V BO.
    [Show full text]