DOCSLIB.ORG

Unit Five: the Civil War & Reconstruction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unit Five: the Civil War & Reconstruction Unit Five: The Civil War & Reconstruction SSUSH8: Explore the relationship between slavery, growing north-south divisions, and westward expansion that led to the outbreak of the Civil War. d. Explain how the Compromise of 1850 arose out of territorial expansion and population growth. e. Evaluate the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the failure of popular sovereignty, Scott v. Sanford, John Brown’s Raid on Harper’s Ferry, and the election of 1860 as events leading to the Civil War. SSUSH9: Evaluate key events, issues, and individuals related to the Civil War a. Explain the importance of the growing economic disparity between the North and the South through an examination of population, functioning railroads, and industrial output. b. Discuss Lincoln’s purpose in using emergency powers to suspend habeas corpus, issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, and delivering the Gettysburg and Second Inaugural Addresses. c. Examine the influences of Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, William T. Sherman, and Jefferson Davis. d. Explain the importance of Fort Sumter, Antietam, Vicksburg, Gettysburg, and Atlanta, as well as the impact of geography on these battles. SSUSH10: Identify legal, political, and social dimensions of Reconstruction. a. Compare and contrast Presidential with Congressional Reconstruction, including the significance of Lincoln’s assassination and Johnson’s impeachment. b. Investigate the efforts of the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, & Abandoned Lands (the Freedmen’s Bureau) to support poor whites, former slaves, & Indians. c. Describe the significance of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth amendments. d. Explain the Black Codes, the Ku Klux Klan, and other forms of resistance to racial equality during Reconstruction. e. Analyze how the Presidential Election of 1876 marked the end of Reconstruction. SSUSH13: Evaluate efforts to reform American society and politics in the Progressive Era. c. Connect the decision of Plessy v. Ferguson to the expansion of Jim Crow laws and the formation of the NAACP. Chapter One: Roots of Conflict California’s desire to come into the Union as a free state led to the drafting of the Compromise of 1850. It tried to make everyone happy and succeeded in pleasing almost no one. The agreement allowed California to come in as a free state, but to make the pro-slavery folks happy, the Fugitive Slave Law was toughened up—making the work of the Underground Railroad even more important. As for the rest of the Mexican Cession, the issue of slavery was put on hold. The topic was just too controversial in Congress to even be debated, so they issued a "Gag Rule" to prevent slavery from even being discussed. (This doomed the proposed Wilmot Proviso, which tried to keep slavery out of the Mexican Cession. It never made it to the floor for a vote.) In 1852, a northerner named Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote a fictional account of slavery’s cruelty called Uncle Tom’s Cabin. It became an international bestseller (at one point, second only to The Bible in sales). After reading the book, people in the North wondered how the South could be so mean. People in the South wondered why people in the North could be so easily be brought to tears. Even though this book (which is still in print) didn’t start the Civil War, it did strain relations between the North and the South. Two years after Stowe’s book hit the stands, Democrat Senator from Illinois, Stephen Douglas, proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In it was a plan to do away with the Missouri Compromise and let states decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery. This is called popular sovereignty and all kinds of trouble for the Democrats resulted from it. Not only was a new antislavery political party formed during this time (called the Republican Party), but so many pro-slavery and anti-slavery men flooded into Kansas (the first to vote on the issue) that fighting broke out. For nearly ten years, hundreds of people were killed over the issue of slavery—giving the state the dubious nickname of “Bleeding Kansas.” In 1857, a slave—Dred Scott—found himself alone in a free state when his owner died. He thought that since no one now “owned” him, and he was in a free state anyway, he was free. Under the law, though, he was supposed to be shipped southward to be resold. Scott sued for his freedom. It went all the way up to the Supreme Court. They ruled that Blacks were property and therefore had no rights. The court also ruled that the whole notion of free states and slave states created by the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. The Dred Scott Decision was like throwing gasoline on a fire. Tensions between the North and South grew. (By the way, Scott eventually got his freedom when he raised enough donations to buy himself. Unfortunately, he died a short time later.) Stephen Douglas ran for re-election in 1858 and was opposed by a little-known lawyer named Abraham Lincoln. Unlike today when politicians use commercials to talk to the people, Lincoln and Douglas travelled around Illinois debating the issue of the day— slavery. The Lincoln-Douglas Debates made the unknown Lincoln a national figure. The South added Lincoln to their list of worries as the abolitionist movement grew in the North. There were countless people who worked to end slavery. Some of them included William Lloyd Garrison who ran an antislavery newspaper called The Liberator and Frederick Douglass who traveled around speaking eloquently about how he escaped slavery. And, of course, there was Harriet Tubman who was called “Moses” by the slaves she led to freedom along the Underground Railroad (which was a series of safe-houses and escape routes leading to free states and not a choo-choo that went underground). Yet there were other abolitionists who had more radical and violent ideas on how to end slavery. One of them was John Brown. John Brown considered himself to be God’s agent on Earth and he decided that the only way to cleanse the country of the “original sin of slavery” was with blood. So, in 1859, Brown led a group of followers into Harper’s Ferry, Virginia. His plan was to 1 seize the guns stored there at the federal arsenal. He was sure that the slaves would then rally to him and he could lead them in a massive uprising that would make Nat Turner’s Rebellion like a picnic. That way, he could destroy slavery forever. (His mistake: the slaves apparently didn’t get the memo about the uprising.) Instead, the army arrived and those who survived were put on trial for treason— including John Brown himself. A short time later he was hanged (Another mistake: rope burns are a killer). Those who thought Brown’s intentions were right sang his praises. People who thought he was nuts said good riddance. One person called him the “meteor of the war” because back then comets and shooting stars were considered signs of bad things to come. And if there is one thing that may have finally pushed America into Civil War it was John Brown’s Raid. You see, because of people like John Brown scaring the crap out of southerners, they started forming militia groups to protect themselves. Those groups formed the basis of the Confederate Army. In the 1860 Presidential election the Democrat Party was split between three sectional candidates. The Republican Party saw their chance and nominated Abraham Lincoln. He was considered a moderate in the North because he only called for the restriction of slavery, not its abolition. Lincoln wanted slavery to be kept out of the territories to prevent its spread, but he vowed not to interfere with it where it existed. However, he did feel that the current situation couldn’t last forever. He said that “a house divided against itself cannot stand.” In other words, Lincoln felt that eventually the country must become all one thing, or all another—slave or free. Still, to the people in the South, he was much too radical. When Lincoln won the election in November, South Carolina voted to secede from the Union the following month. By the time Lincoln took office in March of 1861, seven states had left the Union. By June, four more were gone, including Virginia where the newly elected President of the Confederate States of America (Jefferson Davis) had his capital in Richmond. (Maryland was going to vote on secession, but Lincoln had those in favor of it locked up so they couldn’t do it. Otherwise, Washington would’ve been in enemy territory. This was an example of how Lincoln suspended habeas corpus during the crisis.) The “border states” of Missouri, Kentucky, Delaware, and (later) West Virginia still had slaves, but didn’t join the Confederacy. Chapter Two: The Civil War Begins In the middle of Charleston Harbor sat Fort Sumter. South Carolina told the Union forces within to get out. They refused and in the pre-dawn darkness of April 12, 1861 (at exactly 4:30am), the South opened fire on Fort Sumter and the Civil War began. After over thirty hours of bombardment, and with no help coming, the Union soldiers in Fort Sumter surrendered. The South won its first victory and, ironically, no one was killed. It was a bloodless opening to the bloodiest war in American history. One of the reasons why the Civil War cost so many lives was because the tactics both sides used were way behind the times. Technology was far in advance of what the generals were planning. They still lined up their men like the British did at Bunker Hill and marched into the guns—which were now much more accurate and could be reloaded a whole lot faster.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John Quincy Adams, the Gag Rule, and Antislavery An
    JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, THE GAG RULE, AND ANTISLAVERY AN HONORS THESIS SUBMITTED TO FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS of I.D. 499 by RICHARD A. GANTZ ADVISER - WILLIAM EIDSON BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, INDIANA AUGUST t 1968 ·~ __ I t 196L~ . G,:: {f! TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION •••..•••••.•••.•••..•••. page 1 CI1A.PTER 1 .•••••••••••••••••••••••••• page 2 CI1A.PTER 2 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••. page 12 CONCLUSIONS .•••••.••..••.••••••••••• page 31 BIBLIOGRAPHY ••••. ••••••••.••• ••••••• page 33 INTRODUCTION In the United states in the 1830's, the foremost issue that threatened the future of the Union was slavery. The abolition and antislavery societies became much more aggressive in their campaign to attack slavery. Under this new pressure, the South grew extremely sensitive and defensive of its peculiar institution. In an attempt to still the disruptive debate over slavery, the House of Representatives in 1836 adopted a "gag" rule to stop the flood of petitions calling for abolition. This was passed by the Southerners with the support of the majority of representatives from the North. The leader of the opposition to the gag rule was the venerable ex-President, John Quincy Adams, who was rendering his last years of public service in the House of Representatives. Adams, in his attempt to rescind the gag rule became, willingly or not, the unofficial leader of the antislavery movement. The struggle against the gag rule was closely connected to but was not quite the same as the antislavery movement. In view of this fact and John Quincy Adams's role in both movements, a question arises as to how much his involvement in the antislavery movement was prompted by his work against the gag rule.
    [Show full text]
  • John M. Belohlavek
    596 THE NEW ENGLAND QUARTERLY visible in these works. It is easy to imagine readers in the lobby of the still-thriving Nonantum Resort, or the Cape Arundel Inn, perusing Butler’s pages, and Building Old Cambridge will not only be enjoyed and read with profit by city residents but could and should be- come a text for students in Cambridge and Boston studying historic preservation, cultural landscapes, and/or urban planning. But in both Cambridge and Kennebunkport, where (like everywhere) audiences are diverse, multi-layered, and mobile, readers will bring to these books needs both anticipated and unpredictable. Works like these in practice serve multiple constituencies, from local educators and their students, to avocational readers of history, to researchers who will find in these pages evidence and leads that support scholarship on topics we cannot even yet imagine. Perhaps an enterprising historian or two will propose mobile applications that take this content on the road, to the streets of these places, amplifying the deep local knowl- edge here in new ways for a wider variety of uses and occasions. Until then, these volumes should and will find receptive audiences. Marla R. Miller directs the Public History Program at UMass Amherst. Among other scholarship she is the editor, with Max Page, of Bending the Future: 50 Ideas for the Next 50 Years of Historic Preservation in the United States (2016), and Cultivating a Past: Essays on the History of Hadley, Mas- sachusetts (2009). “AM I GAGGED”? JOHN QUINCY ADAMS AND PRINCIPLED LEADERSHIP john m. belohlavek The Remarkable Education of John Quincy Adams.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Title: Reality Check – Unresolved Issues
    Colorado Teacher-Authored Instructional Unit Sample Social Studies 8th Grade Unit Title: Reality Check – Unresolved Issues INSTRUCTIONAL UNIT AUTHORS Ellicott School District Kelli Cabrera Richard Campbell Anja Centennial Diane Garduno Nathaniel Miller BASED ON A CURRICULUM OVERVIEW SAMPLE AUTHORED BY Archuleta School District Scott White Del Norte School District Jill Martinez Greeley School District Therese Gilbert Colorado’s District Sample Curriculum Project Curriculum Sample District Colorado’s Poudre School District Gabrielle Wymore This unit was authored by a team of Colorado educators. The template provided one example of unit design that enabled teacher- authors to organize possible learning experiences, resources, differentiation, and assessments. The unit is intended to support teachers, schools, and districts as they make their own local decisions around the best instructional plans and practices for all students. DATE POSTED: JANUARY 15, 2016 Colorado Teacher-Authored Sample Instructional Unit Content Area Social Studies Grade Level 8th Grade Course Name/Course Code 8th Grade Social Studies Standard Grade Level Expectations (GLE) GLE Code 1. History 1. Formulate appropriate hypotheses about United States history based on a variety of historical sources and SS09-GR.8-S.1-GLE.1 perspectives 2. The historical eras, individuals, groups, ideas and themes from the origins of the American Revolution through SS09-GR.8-S.1-GLE.2 Reconstruction and their relationships with one another 2. Geography 1. Use geographic tools to analyze patterns in human and physical systems SS09-GR.8-S.2-GLE.1 2. Conflict and cooperation occur over space and resources SS09-GR.8-S.2-GLE.2 3. Economics 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluate the Influence of Jacksonian Democracy on Political and Social Sectionalism in American Society from 1824 – 1860
    Historical Question: Evaluate the influence of Jacksonian Democracy on political and social sectionalism in American society from 1824 – 1860. Jacksonian Democracy DBQ DBQ Question: Evaluate the influence of Jacksonian Democracy on political and social sectionalism in American society from 1824 – 1860. Introduction to DBQ: The period in United States history commonly referred to as the period of “Jacksonian Democracy” proved to be a period of change in part through increased voter participation. It also proved to be a time when the federal government found itself at the forefront of implementing change regardless of how it affected various regions of our country. Many believe that this helped move us down the road of sectionalism and eventually into the Civil War. Historical Thinking Skills: To implement this DBQ activity, students will have to utilize several historical thinking skills. However, use your judgement as to how in-depth you want your student’s historical writing skills to be developed. The main difference between the College Prep and AP US History courses is in the way students approach the subject matter. In College Prep, students are expected to become proficient in their of knowledge of US History and how different events are interconnected, whereas AP US requires students to not only learn about the same events, but also encourages students to become “apprentice historians”. The primary means of attaining that goal is to get students to write like historians. 1. Causation: Thinking about causation involves the ability to identify, analyze, and evaluate relationships among many historical events as both causes and effects. Historians often try to distinguish between immediate, proximate, and long term-causes and effects.
    [Show full text]
  • John Quincy Adams and the Dorcas Allen Case, Washington, DC
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Fall 2010 Slavery exacts an impossible price: John Quincy Adams and the Dorcas Allen case, Washington, DC Alison T. Mann University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Mann, Alison T., "Slavery exacts an impossible price: John Quincy Adams and the Dorcas Allen case, Washington, DC" (2010). Doctoral Dissertations. 531. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/531 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SLAVERY EXACTS AN IMPOSSIBLE PRICE: JOHN QUINCY ADAMS AND THE DORCAS ALLEN CASE, WASHINGTON, D.C. BY ALISON T. MANN Bachelor of Arts, Rutgers University, 1991 Master of Arts, University of New Hampshire, 2003 DISSERTATION Submitted to the University ofNew Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History September, 2010 UMI Number: 3430785 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 3430785 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • "Full of Light and Fire": John Brown in Springfield
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Masters Theses Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 5-2020 "Full of Light and Fire": John Brown in Springfield Louis J. Rocco Jr. University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Rocco, Louis J. Jr., ""Full of Light and Fire": John Brown in Springfield" (2020). Graduate Masters Theses. 609. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses/609 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “FULL OF LIGHT AND FIRE”: JOHN BROWN IN SPRINGFIELD A Thesis Presented by LOUIS J. ROCCO JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2020 History Program i © 2020 by Louis J. Rocco Jr. All rights reserved ii “FULL OF LIGHT AND FIRE”: JOHN BROWN IN SPRINGFIELD A Thesis Presented by LOUIS J. ROCCO JR. Approved as to style and content by: ______________________________________________ Julie Winch, Professor Chairperson of Committee ______________________________________________ Roberta Wollons, Professor Member ______________________________________________ Kibibi V. Mack-Shelton, Professor and Chair of Africana Studies Member _____________________________________________ Elizabeth McCahill, Program Director History Program _____________________________________________ Timothy Hacsi, Chairperson History Department iii ABSTRACT “FULL OF LIGHT AND FIRE”: JOHN BROWN IN SPRINGFIELD May 2020 Louis J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Gag Rule
    Public Choice https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00754-9 Causal inference and American political development: the case of the gag rule Jefery A. Jenkins1 · Charles Stewart III2 Received: 1 July 2019 / Accepted: 18 November 2019 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract We investigate the “gag rule”, a parliamentary device that from 1836 to 1844 barred the US House of Representatives from receiving petitions concerning the abolition of slavery. In the mid-1830s, the gag rule emerged as a partisan strategy to keep slavery of the con- gressional agenda, amid growing abolitionist agitation in the North. Very quickly, how- ever, the strategy backfred, as the gag rule was framed successfully as a mechanism that encroached on white northerners’ rights of petition. By 1844, popular pressure had become so great that many northern Democrats, an important bloc of prior gag rule supporters, yielded to electoral pressure, broke party ranks, and voted to rescind the rule, thereby seal- ing its fate. More generally, the politics of the gag rule provide an interesting causal-infer- ence case study of the interplay between social movement development and congressional politics before the Civil War. Keywords Congress · Gag rule · Slavery · Causal inference JEL Classifcation D72 · N41 1 Introduction Before strains over American regional diferences became so severe as to cause a bloody Civil War, the locus of regional confict was the US Congress. Tarifs, admission of new states and the regulation of slavery were issues that were centered on congressional action. The speeches and votes of Members of Congress on those issues framed how most Ameri- cans viewed the tug of regional interests.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\D\Attach2005\The Gag Rule V12.Wpd
    The Gag Rule, Congressional Politics, and the Growth of Anti-Slavery Popular Politics Jeffery A. Jenkins [email protected] Department of Political Science Northwestern University [email protected] Charles Stewart III [email protected] Department of Political Science The Massachusetts Institute of Technology [email protected] Draft of April 16, 2005 Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 7–10, 2005, Chicago, IL; the Congress and History Conference, MIT, May 30–31, 2002; and the 2003 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 3–6, 2003, Chicago, IL. We thank Joseph Cooper, David Mayhew, Garry Young, and participants of the American Political Development Working Group at the University of Georgia for comments and Dan Carpenter for sharing his data and insights into the politics of petitions during this period. Before strains over the Nation’s regional differences became so severe as to cause a Civil War, the locus of regional conflict was the U.S. Congress. The tariff, the admission of new states, and the regulation of slavery were all issues that were centered on congressional action. The speeches and votes of members of Congress on these issues framed how most Americans viewed the tug of regional interests. This paper is about one episode in the antebellum regional drama—the so-called “gag rule,” which from 1836 to 1844 barred the House from receiving petitions concerning the abolition of slavery. This is an episode of which most students of Congress and of antebellum American history are at least dimly aware; yet, it has elicited few scholarly treatments.1 We find that there were two decisive movements in determining support for the gag rule in the House, both of which were driven by electoral dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 - a Dividing Nation Setting the Stage - the Union Challenged
    Chapter 21 - A Dividing Nation Setting the Stage - The Union Challenged The maps on these two pages show the United States in mid-1850, the year tensions over slavery reached a breaking point. In this unit, you will learn why this crisis developed and how Congress handled it. You will also learn about events after 1850 that further divided the North and South and turned the dispute over slavery into war. As the map shows, some states allowed slavery. Notice, however, that the same number of states banned it. This balance gave the slave states and the free states an equal number of votes in the U.S. Senate. However, as the map on this page shows, that equality did not exist in the House of Representatives, where each state’s votes are based on its population. The Constitution requires that the House and Senate agree on new laws. Southerners believed that as long as the Senate remained balanced, Congress could not pass laws to affect slavery. Then, in 1849, California asked to become a state. California’s new constitution, however, banned slavery. Admitting California as a free state, many Southerners warned, would upset the equal balance between slave states and free states—making the slave states a minority. The 1850s were one of the most troubled decades in U.S. history. Yet, they were mild compared to the 1860s, a time of war, bitterness, and the repair of a broken nation. As you explore the topics in this unit, picture what it must have been like to live during such difficult times.
    [Show full text]
  • Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness Instructor Answer Guide Chapter 6: 1828-1844
    Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness Instructor Answer Guide Chapter 6: 1828-1844 Contents CHAPTER 6 INTRODUCTORY ESSAY: 1828–1844 .............................................. 3 NARRATIVES .............................................................................................................. 4 The Nullification Crisis ........................................................................................................................... 5 The Mormon Trail .................................................................................................................................... 6 The Trail of Tears .................................................................................................................................... 7 William Lloyd Garrison’s War against Slavery ..................................................................................... 8 Nat Turner’s Rebellion ............................................................................................................................ 9 Sam Houston and Texas Independence ............................................................................................... 10 Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the Struggle for Women’s Suffrage ...................................................... 11 The Lowell Girls .................................................................................................................................... 12 John Quincy Adams and the Amistad .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline: 1800-1860
    TIMELINE: 1800-1860 accompanying the Seminar Toolbox THE TRIUMPH of NATIONALISM ♦ THE NATION DIVIDING From Nationalism to Sectionalism in the United States, 1815-1850 National Humanities Center 1800 SECOND CENSUS: U.S. population totals 5.3 million, including one million African Americans, of whom 900,000 are enslaved. Federal capital moves from Philadelphia to Washington, D.C. Virginia bans gathering of slaves at sunset for religious worship. First recorded camp meeting revival is held in Logan County, Kentucky. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr (Demo- John Adams cratic-Republican) defeat John Adams and Charles Pinckney (Federalist). 1801 Jefferson-Burr tie forces election into House of Representatives (since candidates were not nominated separately for president and vice-president); Jefferson is elected in 36 ballots. Tripoli declares war on U.S.; Jefferson sends naval ships to Mediterranean Sea. 1802 Alien and Sedition Acts are allowed to expire by Congress. 1803 LOUISIANA TERRITORY is purchased from France for $15 million. Louis and Clark expedition begins in St. Louis, Missouri. Supreme Court declares its right to review constitutionality of acts of Congress (judicial review) in Marbury v. Madison. th Ohio enters Union as 17 state. Thomas Jefferson 1804 Twelfth Amendment is ratified, providing for separate election of president and vice president. Aaron Burr kills Alexander Hamilton in a pistol duel. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: Jefferson is re-elected president and George Clinton elected vice president. 1805 Lewis and Clark expedition reaches the Pacific Ocean. Capt. Clark and his men shooting bears Barbary War with Tripoli ends after U.S. troops capture Darna. 1806 Lewis and Clark expedition ends with successful return to St.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting the Dynamics of Urban Slavery in the South Institution: Telfair Museum of Art, Inc
    Sample of a Successful Implementation Application This document contains the narrative and walkthrough of a previously funded grant application. Every successful application is different, and this application many have been prepared to meet a slightly different set of guidelines. Each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations, as well as the requirements in the current notice of funding opportunity (NOFO). Prospective applicants should consult the current Public Humanities Projects NOFOs at https://www.neh.gov/grants/public/public- humanities-projects for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Public Programs staff well before a grant deadline. The attached application is incomplete. Portions may have been deleted to protect the privacy interests of an individual, and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information, and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: The Owens-Thomas House: Interpreting the Dynamics of Urban Slavery in the South Institution: Telfair Museum of Art, Inc. Project Director: Shannon Browning-Mullins Grant Program: Public Humanities Projects, Historic Places Implementation Telfair Museums 2 Abstract Telfair Museums seeks a $400,000 NEH Historic Places implementation grant to reinterpret its Owens-Thomas House and Slave Quarters, transforming this National Historic Landmark through interactive exhibits on the slave economy, gender dynamics, and the impacts of urban slavery in the South. Scheduled to take 1.5 years to complete with a total budget of $872,706, this reinterpretation plan builds on more than 20 years of humanities scholarship, including Telfair’s national-award-winning project Slavery and Freedom in Savannah, which launched one of the country’s first full-scale attempts to tell the story of urban slavery in the South.
    [Show full text]