DOCSLIB.ORG

Ruffed and Hazel Grouse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Grouse Bibliography Revision date: 6 December 2013 Check for newer version Compiled by Donald H. Wolfe George M. Sutton Avian Research Center Organized by genus Bonasa and Tetrastes Centrocercus Dendragapus and Falcipennis Lagopus Tetrao and Lyrurus Tympanuchus general grouse related topics Note: I would welcome any other citations not listed here or links to other grouse- related bibliographical sources. Also, please alert me of any errors that are detected. This bibliography is always a “work in progress”, and is updated as new information is available and time allows. Bonasa and Tetrastes (Ruffed, Hazel, and Chinese Grouse) Aberg, J. 1996. Effects of habitat fragmentation on Hazel Grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in boreal landscapes. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife Ecology, Report 32. 69pp. Aberg, J. 2000. The occurrence of Hazel Grouse in the boreal forest; effects of habitat composition at several spatial scales. Ph. D. dissertation. Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala. 108pp. Aberg, J., G. Jansson, J. E. Swenson, and P. Angelstam. 1995. The effect of matrix on the occurrence of Hazel Grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in isolated habitat fragments. Oecologia 103:265-269. 1 Aberg, J., G. Jansson, J. E. Swenson, and P. Angelstam. 1996. The effect of matrix on the occurrence of Hazel Grouse in isolated habitat fragments. Grouse News 11:22. Aberg, J., G. Jansson, J. E. Swenson, and G. Mikusinski. 2000. Difficulties in detecting habitat selection by animals in generally suitable areas. Wildlife Biology 6:89- 99. Aberg, J, J. E. Swenson, and H. Andren. 2000. The dynamics of Hazel Grouse (Bonasa bonasia L.) occurrence in habitat fragments. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:352-358. Aberg, J., J. E, Swenson, and P. Angelstam. 2003. The habitat requirements of Hazel Grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in managed boreal forest and applicability of forest stand descriptions as a tool to identify suitable patches. Forest Ecology and Management 175:437-444. Adams, D. A. 1960. Communal courtship in Ruffed Grouse, Bonasa umbellus L. Auk 77:86-87. Adams, D. W. 2003. A habitat-based viability study for Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus) in Illinois. M. Sc. Thesis. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. Adams, H. P. 1953. A summer survey of deer and grouse in the Arnot area. M. Sc. Thesis. Cornell University. Addy, C. E. 1940. The ecological factors affecting the distribution and abundance of the Ruffed Grouse in Virginia. M. Sc. Thesis. Virginia Polytech University. Adra, W. 2012. Influence des indicateurs paysagers et de leur échelle d'intégration sur l'habitat d'une espèce avienne : conséquences sur la modélisation de la qualité d'habitat de la Gélinotte dans une perspective de gestion conservatoire. [Influence of landscape indicators and their scale integration on the habitat of a bird species: consequences on modelling of the quality of habitat of Hazel Grouse in a conservatory management perspective.] Ph. D. Theses. Université de Grenoble. 262pp. (in French). Ahnlund, H., and B. Helander. 1975. The food of the Hazel Grouse (Tetrastes bonasia) in Sweden. Viltrevy 9:221-240. Alamargot, J. 1972. Splanchnologie topographique, notes ostéologiques et myologiques de la gélinotte huppée (Bonasa umbellus L. 1958). [Topographic characteristics, osteological and myologic notes of the Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus L. 1958). M. Sc. Thesis. University of Montreal. (in French). Aldrich, J. W., and H. Friedmann. 1943. A revision of the Ruffed Grouse. Condor 2 45:85-103. Alimpev, I. V., and S. N. Postnikov. 1988. [The influence of timber felling and cattle grazing on the dwelling environment of grouse in the mountain-forest zone of Chelyabinsk region.] Ekologiya ptits Volzhsko-Uralskogo regiona. [Ecology of birds of the Volga-Uralsk region.] Pages: 4-6 Allan, T., and S. Allan. 1986. Common Raven attacks Ruffed Grouse. Jack-Pine Warbler 64:43-44. Allen, A. A. 1934. Sex rhythm in the Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus Linn.) and other birds. Auk 51:180-199. Allen, A. A. 1934. Breeding season behaviour of the Ruffed Grouse. Transactions of the American Game Conference 20:311-322. Almasan, H., and S. Kohlmann. 1989. Uber die taxonomische stellung des Karpatischen Haselhuhnes – Bonasa bonasia (L.). [The taxonomic position of the Karpati Hazel Grouse – Bonasa bonasia (L.)]. Travaux du Museum National d’Historie Naturelle Grigore Antipa 30:231-243. (in German). Amman, G. A. 1961. Final summary of the Ruffed Grouse brood survey. Michigan Department of Conservation, Game Division. Allin, A. E. Fluctuations in the Ruffed Grouse pooulation of the Thunder Bay district, Ontario. Loon 36:74-83. Allison, D. G. 1963. Basic features of the New Hampshire Ruffed Grouse census. Journal of Wildlife Management 27:614-616. Ammann, G. A. 1950. A ten year comparison of the Ruffed Grouse kill in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Michigan Departement of Conservation, Game Division Report 1096. 2pp. Ammann, G. A., and W. L. Palmer. 1958. Ruffed Grouse introductions on Michigan islands. Journal of Wildlife Management 22:322-325. Ammann, G. A., and L. A. Ryel. 1963. Extensive methods of inventorying Ruffed Grouse in Michigan. Journal of Wildlife Management 27:617-633. Anderson, L. R. 1972. An ecological analysis of Ruffed Grouse drumming logs in a Northern Boreal Forest. M. A. Thesis. St. Mary’s University of Minnesota. Andreev, A. V. 1977. [Temperature conditions in snow burrows of the Hazel Grouse (Tetrastes bonasia kolymensis).] Ecology 5:93-95. (in Russian) 3 Andreev, A. 1978. Temperature conditions in snow cavities of the Hazel Grouse (Tetrastes bonasia kolymensis But.). Soviet Journal of Ecology 9:454-455. Andreev, A. V., and A. V. Krechmar. 1976. [Radiotelemetric study of microclimate in snow resting places of Tetrastes bonasia sibericus.] Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 55:1113-1114. (in Russian with English summary). Archibald, H. L. 1973. Spring drumming and space use of Ruffed Grouse. M. Sc. Thesis. Archibald, H. L. 1974. Directional differences in the sound intensity of Ruffed Grouse drumming. Auk 91:517-521. Archibald, H. L. 1975. Temporal patterns of spring space use by Ruffed Grouse. Journal of Wildlife Management 39:472-481. Archibald, H. L. 1976. Spatial relationships of neighboring male Ruffed Grouse in spring. Journal of Wildlife Management 40:750-760. Archibald, H. L. 1976. Spring drumming patterns of Ruffed Grouse. Auk 93:808-829. Arthaud, G. J. 1991. Aspen timber value and Ruffed Grouse habitat: economic trade- offs considering spatial and temporal dimensions. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota. 133pp. Artuso, I. 1995. Distribution of grouse in the Italian Alps (1988-1992). Proceedings of the International Grouse Symposium 6:129-130. Aschenbrenner, H., H. Bergmann, and F. Muller. 1978. Gefangenschaftsbrut beim hazelhuhn (Bonasa bonasia L.) [Brood size in Hazel Hen (Bonasa bonasia L.)]. Pirsch 30:70-75. (in German). Aschenbrenner, H., and W. Scherzinger. 1978. Wenn der hazelhuhn baltz. Pirsch – Der Deutche Jager, vol. 19. (in German). Atwater, S., and J. Schnell. 1989. Ruffed Grouse. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA. 370pp. Aubin, A. E. 1970. Territory and territorial behavior of male Ruffed Grouse in southwestern Alberta. M. Sc. Thesis. University of Alberta, Edmonton. Aubin, A. E. 1972. Aural communication in Ruffed Grouse. Canadian Journal of Zoology 50:1225-1229. Aubry, K., C. Chartier, I. Chartier, and C. Desrosiers. 1992. Étude de la population de gélinottes huppées (Bonasa umbellus) sur la Réserve faunique de Rimouski: 4 automne 1992. [Study of the population of Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus) on the faunal Reserve of Rimouski: autumn 1992.] Université du Québec à Rimouski. (in French). Audet, G. 1995. Étude de la population de gélinottes huppées (Bonasa umbellus) sur la réserve faunique de Rimouski: automne 1995. [Study of the population of Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus) on the faunal reserve of Rimouski: autumn 1995.] Université du Québec à Rimouski. (in French). Baba, Y., Y. Fujimaki, S. Klaus, O. Butorina, S. Drovetskii, and H. Koike. 2002. Molecular population phylogeny of Hazel Grouse Bonasa bonasia in East Asia inferred from mitochondrial control-region sequences. Wildlife Biology 8:251- 259. Baba, Y., Y. Fujimaki, and H. Koike. 2000. Genetic diversity and gene flow of the Hazel Grouse Bonasa bonasia in Japan. Japanese Journal of Ornithology 48:47- 60. Baba, Y., Y. Fujimaki, R. Yoshii, and H. Koike. 2001. Genetic variability in the mitochondrial control region of the Japanese Rock Ptarmigan Lagopus mutus japonicus. Japanese Journal of Ornithology 50:53-64. Baba, Y., H. Koike, T. Okayama, and Y. Fujimaki. 1997. Mitochondrial DNA analysis using feathers of Rock Ptarmigan Lagopus mutus japonicus and Hazel Grouse Bonasa bonasia in Japan. Wildlife Biology 3:277. Back, G. N. 1982. Impacts of management for Ruffed Grouse and pulpwood on nongame birds. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota. Backs, S. E. 1979. Characteristics of brood habitat of Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus) in Grafton, Vermont. M. Sc. Thesis. University of Vermont. Backs, S. E. 1984. Ruffed Grouse restoration in Indiana. Pages 37-58 IN: Robinson, W. L. (ed.). 1984. Ruffed Grouse Management: State of the Art in the 1980’s. Proceedings of Symposium at 45th Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, 5-7 December, 1983. Bookcrafters. Chelsea, Mich. Backs, S. E. 1984. The historic and present distribution of Ruffed Grouse in Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 92:161-166. Backs, S. E., S. T. Kelly, and P. D. Major. 1984. Characteristics of drumming habitat of Ruffed Grouse in Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 94:227-230. Bai-Ran, Yang. 1993. [On food features and nutrient analysis of Hazel Grouse in bud- feeding periods.] Acta Zoologica Sinica 39:48-55. (in Chinese with English 5 summary). Bailey, W. J. 19XX. A population study of the Ruffed Grouse ("Bonasa umbellus subsp".) in Central Pennsylvania. M. Sc. Thesis. Pennsylvania State University. Bailey, W. L., W. M. Sharp, R. B. Hazel, and G. Davis. 1955. Foot habit trends of Ruffed Grouse in Centre County “Barrens.” Pennsylvania State University, Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin 604.
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Helminths from Lizards and Amphisbaenians (Reptilia, Squamata) of South America Ticle R A

    Checklist of Helminths from Lizards and Amphisbaenians (Reptilia, Squamata) of South America Ticle R A

    The Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases ISSN 1678-9199 | 2010 | volume 16 | issue 4 | pages 543-572 Checklist of helminths from lizards and amphisbaenians (Reptilia, Squamata) of South America TICLE R A Ávila RW (1), Silva RJ (1) EVIEW R (1) Department of Parasitology, Botucatu Biosciences Institute, São Paulo State University (UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista), Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil. Abstract: A comprehensive and up to date summary of the literature on the helminth parasites of lizards and amphisbaenians from South America is herein presented. One-hundred eighteen lizard species from twelve countries were reported in the literature harboring a total of 155 helminth species, being none acanthocephalans, 15 cestodes, 20 trematodes and 111 nematodes. Of these, one record was from Chile and French Guiana, three from Colombia, three from Uruguay, eight from Bolivia, nine from Surinam, 13 from Paraguay, 12 from Venezuela, 27 from Ecuador, 17 from Argentina, 39 from Peru and 103 from Brazil. The present list provides host, geographical distribution (with the respective biome, when possible), site of infection and references from the parasites. A systematic parasite-host list is also provided. Key words: Cestoda, Nematoda, Trematoda, Squamata, neotropical. INTRODUCTION The present checklist summarizes the diversity of helminths from lizards and amphisbaenians Parasitological studies on helminths that of South America, providing a host-parasite list infect squamates (particularly lizards) in South with localities and biomes. America had recent increased in the past few years, with many new records of hosts and/or STUDIED REGIONS localities and description of several new species (1-3).
  • WATERFOWL ___Cackling Goose

    WATERFOWL ___Cackling Goose

    WATERFOWL ____ Least Sandpiper FALCONS BUSHTITS ____ Pine Grosbeak ____ Cackling Goose ____ Wilson's Snipe ____ American Kestrel ____ Bushtit ____ House Finch ____ Canada Goose ____ Spotted Sandpiper ____ Merlin ____ Purple Finch NUTHATCHES ____ Wood Duck ____ Solitary Sandpiper ____ Peregrine Falcon ____ Red-breasted Nuthatch ____ Cassin’s Finch ____ Blue-winged Teal ____ Greater Yellowlegs ____ Prairie Falcon ____ White-breasted Nuthatch ____ Common Redpoll ____ Cinnamon Teal ____ Red Crossbill CORMORANTS FLYCATCHERS ____ Pygmy Nuthatch ____ Northern Shoveler ____ Double-crested Cormorant ____ Western Kingbird ____ Pine Siskin CREEPERS ____ Gadwall ____ Eastern Kingbird ____ American Goldfinch ____ American Wigeon PELICANS, HERONS, IBIS ____ Brown Creeper ____ Great Blue Heron ____ Olive-sided Flycatcher SPARROWS ____ Mallard ____ Western Wood-Pewee WRENS ____ Chipping Sparrow ____ Green-winged Teal VULTURES, RAPTORS ____ Willow Flycatcher ____ Rock Wren ____ Fox Sparrow ____ Ring-necked Duck ____ Turkey Vulture ____ Least Flycatcher ____ Canyon Wren ____ American Tree Sparrow ____ Harlequin Duck ____ Osprey ____ Hammond’s Flycatcher ____ House Wren ____ Dark-eyed Junco ____ Bufflehead ____ Golden Eagle ____ Gray Flycatcher ____ Pacific Wren ____ White-crowned Sparrow ____ Common Goldeneye ____ Northern Harrier ____ Dusky Flycatcher ____ Marsh Wren ____ Golden-crowned Sparrow ____ Barrow's Goldeneye ____ Sharp-shinned Hawk ____ Pacific-slope Flycatcher ____ Bewick’s Wren ____ White-throated Sparrow ____ Hooded Merganser ____ Cooper’s
  • Review Article Nematodes of Birds of Armenia

    Review Article Nematodes of Birds of Armenia

    Annals of Parasitology 2020, 66(4), 447–455 Copyright© 2020 Polish Parasitological Society doi: 10.17420/ap6604.285 Review article Nematodes of birds of Armenia Sergey O. MOVSESYAN1,2, Egor A. VLASOV3, Manya A. NIKOGHOSIAN2, Rosa A. PETROSIAN2, Mamikon G. GHASABYAN2,4, Dmitry N. KUZNETSOV1,5 1Centre of Parasitology, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Leninsky pr., 33, Moscow 119071, Russia 2Institute of Zoology, Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology NAS RA, P. Sevak 7, Yerevan 0014, Armenia 3V.V. Alekhin Central-Chernozem State Nature Biosphere Reserve, Zapovednyi, Kursk district, Kursk region, 305528, Russia 4Armenian Society for the Protection of Birds (ASPB), G. Njdeh, 27/2, apt.10, Yerevan 0026, Armenia 5All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Fundamental and Applied Parasitology of Animals and Plants - a branch of the Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Federal Scientific Centre VIEV”, Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya str., 28, Moscow 117218, Russia Corresponding Author: Dmitry N. KUZNETSOV; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. The review provides data on species composition of nematodes in 50 species of birds from Armenia (South of Lesser Caucasus). Most of the studied birds belong to Passeriformes and Charadriiformes orders. One of the studied species of birds (Larus armenicus) is an endemic. The taxonomy and host-specificity of nematodes reported in original papers are discussed with a regard to current knowledge about this point. In total, 52 nematode species parasitizing birds in Armenia are reported. Most of the reported species of nematodes are quite common in birds outside of Armenia. One species (Desmidocercella incognita from great cormorant) was first identified in Armenia.
  • 11 Blue Grouse

    11 Blue Grouse

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Grouse and Quails of North America, by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences May 2008 11 Blue Grouse Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscigrouse Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "11 Blue Grouse" (2008). Grouse and Quails of North America, by Paul A. Johnsgard. 13. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscigrouse/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Grouse and Quails of North America, by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Blue Grouse Dendragapw obsctlrus (Say) 182 3 OTHER VERNACULAR NAMES @USKY grouse, fool hen, gray grouse, hooter, mountain grouse, pine grouse, pine hen, Richardson grouse, sooty grouse. RANGE From southeastern Alaska, southern Yukon, southwestern Mackenzie, and western Alberta southward along the offshore islands to Vancouver and along the coast to northern California, and in the mountains to southern California, northern and eastern Arizona, and west central New Mexico (A.O.U. Check-list). SUBSPECIES (ex A.O.U. Check-list) D. o. obscurus (Say): Dusky blue grouse. Resident in the mountains from central Wyoming and western South Dakota south through eastern Utah and Colorado to northern and eastern Arizona and New Mexico. D. o. sitkensis Swarth: Sitkan blue grouse. Resident in southeastern Alaska south through the coastal islands to Calvert Island and the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia.
  • Evaluation of a Density Index for Territorial Male Hazel Grouse Bonasa Bonasia in Spring and Autumn

    Evaluation of a Density Index for Territorial Male Hazel Grouse Bonasa Bonasia in Spring and Autumn

    Ornis Fennica 68 :57-65. 1991 Evaluation of a density index for territorial male Hazel Grouse Bonasa bonasia in spring and autumn Jon E. Swenson Swenson, J. E., Department of Zoology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada, and Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, S-730 91 Riddarhyttan, Sweden (correspondence to Swedish address) . Received 14 September 1990, accepted 10 January 1991 A density index for territorial male Hazel Grouse Bonasa bonasia in spring and au- tumn is presented and evaluated. One whistles with a hunter's whistle every 30 seconds for 6 minutes from census points located at 150-m intervals within the area to be censused, and responding Hazel Grouse are counted. Counts were conducted throughout days with little or no wind. The number of counted males was significantly and linearly correlated with the number of known territorial males on an intensive study area. There, 82% of the territorial males responded and were counted. Response rate appeared to be independent of density, based on counts in areas with a 20-fold variation in densities. When censuses were repeated, both results were similar. Within the conditions of these counts, no effects of weather or date were found. However, Hazel Grouse responded less at midday. Using this method, one can count Hazel Grouse at a rate of about 5 minutes per ha along transects and 5-9 minutes per ha on blocks of habitat, depending on plot size. I recommend that censuses be conducted during 4-5 weeks prior to laying in spring and during 4-5 weeks after brood dissolution in autumn .
  • Observation on a Sooty Grouse Population at Sage Hen Creek

    Observation on a Sooty Grouse Population at Sage Hen Creek

    THE CONDOR--- VOLUME 58 SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER, 1956 NUMBER 5 OBSERVATIONS ON A SOOTY GROUSE POPULATION AT SAGE HEN CREEK, CALIFORNIA By ROBERT S. HOFFMANN In recent years there has been considerable interest in two separate aspects of the biology of Blue Grouse (Dendragapus) . The first of these is the controversy concerning their taxonomy. The genus is widely distributed in the coniferous forests of the western states and consists of two groups of races recognized by some as separate species: the fuliginosus group, or Sooty Grouse, along the Pacific coast, and the obscures group, or Dusky Grouse, in the Great Basin and Rocky Mountain areas. Originally these two groups were placed under the name Dendragapus obscurus on the basis of supposed intergradation (Bendire, 1892:41,44, SO). The work of Brooks (1912,1926,1929) and Swarth (1922, 1926), however, led to their separation in the fourth edition of the A.O.U. Check-list (1931) into coastal and interior species. This split stood until the publication of the 19th Supplement to the A.O.U. Check-list (1944) when, following Peters (1934), D. fuliginosus and its subspecieswere replaced under D. obscurus. Al- though at that time some doubt was still expressedabout the correctnessof this merger (Grinnell and Miller, 1944: 113), intergradation in northern Washington and southern British Columbia between the races fuliginosus and pallidus has now been reported by several authors (Munro and Cowan, 1947:89; Carl, Guiguet, and Hardy, 1952:86; Jewett, Taylor, Shaw, and Aldrich, 1953 : 200). The taxonomy of these grouse must rest upon the fact of intergradation between the two groups of races.
  • Dusky Grouse Tend to Be Adapted Dusky and Sooty Grouse Were Considered Distinct

    Dusky Grouse Tend to Be Adapted Dusky and Sooty Grouse Were Considered Distinct

    Volt.un£ 14 .Numkt 3 9all2006 Blue Grouse divided by two equals Dusky and Sooty Grouse Michael A. Schroeder, Upland Bird Research Biologist Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 1077 Bridgeport, W A 98813 email: [email protected] The state of Washington has a new species of grouse, at least forested habitats throughout the year, it appears to be according to the American Ornithologists Union (Auk, 2006, vulnerable to variations in forest practices. For example, Pages 926-936). Dendragapus obscurus (formerly known as research on Sooty Grouse in British Columbia indicated that the Blue Grouse) has now been split into 2 species based on their populations fluctuated dramatically depending on the genetic, morphological, and behavioral evidence; the Dusky age of the forest following clear-cutting. Unfortunately, there Grouse (Dendragapus obscurus) and the Sooty Grouse has been little effort to evaluate the relationship between (Dendragapus fuliginosus). This split is actually a reversion forest management practices and Sooty Grouse populations. to the previous situation during the early 1900s when the In contrast to Sooty Grouse, Dusky Grouse tend to be adapted Dusky and Sooty Grouse were considered distinct. to relatively open habitats in forest openings or close to forest edges. Because these open habitats are preferred areas for As a group, Dusky and Sooty Grouse are widely distributed livestock production and development, it is necessary to in the mountainous portions of western North America. understand the relationships between land use and grouse Although they generally winter in coniferous forest, their populations. The human population increase in the breeding breeding habitats are quite varied.
  • The Occurrence of Hazel Grouse in the Boreal Forest

    The Occurrence of Hazel Grouse in the Boreal Forest

    Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae SlLVESTRlA 1 5 8 vltR ,C f JLto « SLU The Occurrence of Hazel Grouse in the Boreal Forest Effects of habitat composition at several spatial scales Johan Åberg S w ed ish university of Agricultural Sc ie n c e s \SLU </M , ^ *S U The occurrence of hazel grouse in the boreal forest: effects of habitat composition at several spatial scales Johan Åberg Akademisk avhandling som for vinnande av filosofie doktorsexamen kommer att offentligen försvaras i Sal FU 26, Undervisningshuset, SLU, Uppsala, fredagen den 3 november 2000, kl. 10.00. Abstract This thesis presents data on factors determining the occurrence and dynamics of hazel grouse populations at several spatial scales in five landscapes with different management regimes. In a forested area with a low degree of habitat variation the relationship between occurrence of hazel grouse and type of habitat was best explained at scales equal or larger than the home range, compared to smaller spatial scales. At this spatial scale the hazel grouse preferred spruce stands 20-69 years old and those older than 90 years, having 5-40% deciduous trees. More specifically the presence of hazel grouse in a habitat patch was positively influenced by a high amcunt of vertical ground cover, rich field layer vegetation and the presence of alder. At the landscape scale the occurrence of hazel grouse in habitat patches in intensively managed landscapes was negatively affected by increasing distance between suitable habitats both in an agriculture-dominated landscape and in a forest-dominated landscape. The threshold distances for hazel grouse movements were about 200 m in the agricultural landscape and about 10 times longer in the forested landscape, suggesting a strong effect of different types of matrix.
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically

    Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically

    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
  • YOSHINO-01 65417.Pdf

    YOSHINO-01 65417.Pdf

    J.Rakuno Gakuen Univ.,38(2):139～148(2014) Filarial nematodes belonging to the superorders Diplotriaenoidea and Aproctoidea from wild and captive birds in Japan Tomoo YOSHINO웋웦워웗,Natsuki HAM A웍웗,Manabu ONUMA웎웗,Masaoki TAKAGI웏웗, Kei SATO원웗,Shin MATSUI웏웗,Mariko HISAKA웏웗,Tokuma YANAI웑웗,Haruo ITO웒웗, Nobutaka URANO웓웗,Yu ichi OSA웋월웗and웬Mitsuhiko ASAKAW A웋웗 (Accepted 17 January 2014) Introduction Materials and Methods Nematodes belonging to the superorders Di- The nematode specimens were obtained from plotriaenoidea and Aproctoidea parasitize many wild and captive birds,including Turdus naum- orders of birds and sometimes reptiles［24,25］. mani Temminck,1820(15:number of infected These nematodes are found in the air sac,lungs, individuals), Poecile varius (Temminck& orbital cavity,body cavity,abdominal cavity, Schlegel,1845)(2),Parus minor Temminck& subcutaneous tissues and/or under the skin［21］. Schlegel,1848(1),Falco columbarius Linnaeus, Also,they are well known to often cause subcuta- 1758(1),Falco peregrinus Tunstall,1771(2),Ac- neous emphysema,pneumonia and/or air sac- cipiter gentilis (Linnaeus,1758)(2),Lanius buce- culitis,including fatal cases,especially in Fal- phalus Temminck& Schlegel,1845(1),Lanius coniformes［1,7-10,14,15,21,23,26,30,31］. cristatus lucionensis Linnaeus,1766(1),Otus flam- Despite the ir common occurrence throughout the meolus Kaup,1853(1)and Otus sunia Hodgson, world,there have been few reports of 1836(2)between 1995 and 2009 in Japan.They nematodiasis attributed to these two groups in were removed in post mortem examination
  • Ahead of Print Online Version Phylogenetic Relationships of Some

    Ahead of Print Online Version Phylogenetic Relationships of Some

    Ahead of print online version FOLIA PARASITOLOGICA 58[2]: 135–148, 2011 © Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre ASCR ISSN 0015-5683 (print), ISSN 1803-6465 (online) http://www.paru.cas.cz/folia/ Phylogenetic relationships of some spirurine nematodes (Nematoda: Chromadorea: Rhabditida: Spirurina) parasitic in fishes inferred from SSU rRNA gene sequences Eva Černotíková1,2, Aleš Horák1 and František Moravec1 1 Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic; 2 Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Abstract: Small subunit rRNA sequences were obtained from 38 representatives mainly of the nematode orders Spirurida (Camalla- nidae, Cystidicolidae, Daniconematidae, Philometridae, Physalopteridae, Rhabdochonidae, Skrjabillanidae) and, in part, Ascaridida (Anisakidae, Cucullanidae, Quimperiidae). The examined nematodes are predominantly parasites of fishes. Their analyses provided well-supported trees allowing the study of phylogenetic relationships among some spirurine nematodes. The present results support the placement of Cucullanidae at the base of the suborder Spirurina and, based on the position of the genus Philonema (subfamily Philoneminae) forming a sister group to Skrjabillanidae (thus Philoneminae should be elevated to Philonemidae), the paraphyly of the Philometridae. Comparison of a large number of sequences of representatives of the latter family supports the paraphyly of the genera Philometra, Philometroides and Dentiphilometra. The validity of the newly included genera Afrophilometra and Carangi- nema is not supported. These results indicate geographical isolation has not been the cause of speciation in this parasite group and no coevolution with fish hosts is apparent. On the contrary, the group of South-American species ofAlinema , Nilonema and Rumai is placed in an independent branch, thus markedly separated from other family members.
  • Survey of Southern Amazonian Bird Helminths Kaylyn Patitucci

    Survey of Southern Amazonian Bird Helminths Kaylyn Patitucci

    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2015 Survey Of Southern Amazonian Bird Helminths Kaylyn Patitucci Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Patitucci, Kaylyn, "Survey Of Southern Amazonian Bird Helminths" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 1945. https://commons.und.edu/theses/1945 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SURVEY OF SOUTHERN AMAZONIAN BIRD HELMINTHS by Kaylyn Fay Patitucci Bachelor of Science, Washington State University 2013 Master of Science, University of North Dakota 2015 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota December 2015 This thesis, submitted by Kaylyn F. Patitucci in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science from the University of North Dakota, has been read by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whom the work has been done and is hereby approved. __________________________________________ Dr. Vasyl Tkach __________________________________________ Dr. Robert Newman __________________________________________ Dr. Jefferson Vaughan