DOCSLIB.ORG

THE 1959 HEBGEN LAKE, MONTANA, EARTHQUAKE: TWO GEOLOGIC POINTS of VIEW by Irving J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE 1959 HEBGEN LAKE, MONTANA, EARTHQUAKE: TWO GEOLOGIC POINTS of VIEW by Irving J THE 1959 HEBGEN LAKE, MONTANA, EARTHQUAKE: TWO GEOLOGIC POINTS OF VIEW by Irving J. Witkind U.S. Geological Survey Denver, CO 80225 Some 16 years ago a major earth- quake, centered near Hebgen Lake, Montana, shook Yellowstone National Park, and abruptly brought to an end the bustling 1959 tourist season. That earthquake, formally known as "The Hebgen Lake, Montana, earthquake of August 17, 1959", was widely publi- cized, and as a result of the public's keen interest in the geologic features formed during the earthquake, the Forest Service set aside the area of major damage as an educational and the northeast edge of the Henrys Lake recreational area. Now, attractive ex- basin to end against the reactivated hibits and skilled naturalists explain the northwest-trending Hebgen and Red various geologic phenomena to the Canyon faults. They assume that the many tourists who annually pass Madison Range subsided along with through the area. the flanking basins, but not as much. Immediately after the earthquake Dual-basin concept.—A second the Geological Survey began a series of group of geologists concluded that the intensive geologic investigations of the deformational pattern involved two ba- epicentral area. It soon became ap- sins of subsidence, one on each side of a parent that geologists viewing the same tectonically stable Madison Range. phenomena interpreted them differ- Each of these basins slopes gently ently. Two major concepts evolved each northeastward to end against reacti- with its own adherents, and as the vated faults; the West Yellowstone Ba- field work continued it became obvious sin (east of the Range) ends against that a vexatious controversy had begun. the reactivated Hebgen and Red Can- Neither side could uncover convincing yon faults, and the Missouri Flats evidence that would resolve the con- (west of the Range) end against the flict. Finally, as the time came to pre- reactivated Madison Range fault. In pare a formal report on the completed this interpretation the Madison Range studies, the geologists concerned agreed did not subside. to disagree. STRUCTURAL SETTING Now, some 16 years later after ad- Underlying this controversy is the ditional geologic and geophysical work, fact that the advocates of each con- where do we stand? It would be pleas- cept interpret the regional structure dif- ant indeed to indicate that these ad- ferently. This part of southwestern ditional studies have resolved the prob- Montana and southeastern Idaho is lem. In fact, the results are inconclusive marked by northwest-trending moun- and seemingly favor neither concept. tain ranges separated by narrow valleys —typical basin-and-range structures THE TWO CONCEPTS that result from extensional block fault- As geologists studied the epicentral ing (see map). Most of these mountains area shortly after the earthquake it are bordered on one flank by a high- quickly became apparent that large angle range-front normal fault in which blocks of the Earth's crust had sub- the valley is downthrown relative to the sided, but there were sharply different range. Thus, for example, the north- opinions as to which blocks had sub- west-trending Madison Range is sepa- sided and the exact pattern of deforma- rated from the Madison Valley by the tion impressed on these blocks. high-angle Madison Range normal Single-basin concept.—One group fault. Similarly, the other northwest- of geologists concluded that the defor- trending ranges are separated from mation pattern was best satisfied by the their adjacent valleys by high-angle uneven subsidence of a single crustal normal faults. This persistent northwest block deformed into a basin. In their trend of these structural mountain and interpretation, the axis of this basin valley pairs is interrupted by the Cen- slopes gently northeastward from near tennial Mountains—Centennial Valley 4 AISAROKA 45° Index map of southwestern Montana and southeastern Idaho showing the basin-and- range pattern in this part of the northern VIAL VALLEY NE Rocky Mountains. The general northwest FAULT CENTENNIAL structural grain of the region is disrupted CENTENNIAL MTs by the eastward-trending Centennial Moun- TONE tains-Centennial Valley structural pair. AREA OF MAP BEL ATEAU Heavy lines indicate high-angle normal SNAKE RIVER PLAIN 0 50 KM faults. Bar and ball are on downthrown side. 44° 113° 112° Xoc CP O fo Wade Lake 0 10 20 MILES ISSOURI ch FLATS 0 10 20 KILOMETRES II. Lake 0 Hebgen Lake 1• \-Th TARHEE LAKE Mrs \PASS Elk Lake Lima Reservoir Red River West Yellows HovIt4rd Lower Red Red Pock Lake ALLEY / Mud Lake. Rock Lake CENTENNIAL. o Henrys lake Lakeview HENRYS ido ONTANA LAKE BASIN ° /...—ACENTENNIAL , MOUNTAIrrS" 5 -1 —IDAHO I \ -- 44 °30' I WYOMING 112'30' 112'15 112 °00 III ° 45' 111 30 111 Part of southwestern Montana and southeastern Idaho showing general relations between the Centennial and Madison Range faults. The Centennial fault can be traced eastward to the western edge of the Henrys Lake basin; it is uncertain whether it extends still further eastward. structural pair, which trends eastward The adherents of the single-basin directly across the structural grain of concept believe that the eastward-trend- the region. Like the northwest-trending ing Centennial structures represent a structures, the Centennial Mountains fundamental change in a long-estab- also are separated from the Centennial lished structural pattern. In their view Valley by a high-angle normal fault— these are younger structures that are the Centennial fault. Here too, the val- being extended eastward across the ley is downthrown relative to the moun- older northwest-trending structures rep- tains. Fresh scarps along the Madison resented by the Madison Range—Madi- Range and Centennial faults, as well son Valley structural pair. Cohsequently, as along most of the other high-angle they consider the earthquake to have faults, indicate that segments of vir- been caused by movement on an east- tually all the faults have been active ward-trending deep-seated fault related within recent geologic time. to these Centennial structures. They 5 suggest that primary movement on this on, the Survey also conducted a gravity deep-seated fault triggered secondary survey of the area surrounding the movement on the northwest-trending Henrys Lake basin in an attempt to Hebgen and Red Canyon faults now determine whether the Centennial struc- marked by spectacular scarps. To sup- tures—chiefly the Centennial fault— port this view they suggest that the could be traced eastward across the deformational pattern impressed on the basin and through the Madison Range. downthrown crustal blocks is best de- Results of that survey have recently scribed as a single basin of subsidence been published in the Geological Sur- whose axis is alined with the eastward- vey's Journal of Research, volume 3, trending Centennial structures. number 2. By contrast, proponents of the The Centennial fault can be traced dual-basin concept believe that the eastward from near Mud Lake to the causative faults of the earthquake are western edge of the Henry's Lake the newly reactivated northwest-trend- basin. Wherever exposed, it dips north- ing Hebgen and Red Canyon faults. ward (valleyward) with the north block They point to the geologic pattern near downthrown relative to the south one. these faults as evidence that the re- Eastward beyond the western edge of newed movement on these faults was the basin the extent of the fault is in merely one more episode in a sequence doubt. A series of northeast-trending that began in the middle to late Ter- linear features have been interpreted tiary time, and that has continued un- as the fault trace. Of these, the most broken to the present. They see no evi- striking are two or three straight north- dence that the Centennial structures, west-facing embankments (implying some 40 km west of the epicentral down-throw of the north block) which area, have played any role in this par- point directly toward the mouth of ticular earthquake. the valley of Howard Creek. The fault is thought to extend into the mouth RECENT GEOLOGIC AND of the valley and more or less follow GRAVITY STUDIES Highway 20-191 through and across Because the Centennial and Madi- Targhee Pass into the West Yellowstone son Range structures seemingly inter- Basin. The Pass is attributed to move- sect in the Henrys Lake basin, the ment on the fault. The proposed course Geological Survey, in 1968, decided to of the fault across the West Yellow- study the area to determine whether stone Basin is presumably shown by a the Centennial structures, do indeed ex- series of eastward-trending small scarp- tend across the southern ends of the lets which face north and were formed Madison Valley and Madison Range. during the 1959 earthquake. Consequently, the 15-minute Henrys These features, however, can also Lake quadrangle (which includes the be interpreted as relicit valley walls Henrys Lake basin) was mapped at a formed when torrential melt waters, scale of 1:24,000, and subsequently produced from the waste of an ice mass published at a scale of 1:62,500 in the which lay in the West Yellowstone Miscellaneous Investigations map series Basin, escaped southwestward through of the Geological Survey as Map I- Targhee Pass and the valley of Howard 781—A. As the geologic work was going Creek and removed the north half of 6 an ancestral alluvial fan. The minor this gravity high is due to more dense scarplets that break the floor of the Precambrian crystalline rocks which West Yellowstone Basin may be the are exposed north of the highway, but result of slump and compaction of are concealed beneath about 1460 basin fill resulting from the shaking that metres of less dense sedimentary rocks occurred during the 1959 earthquake.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Watkins Creek Ranch Gallatin MT Property Name County State
    NPS Form 10-900a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section ___ Page __ SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 06001180 Date Listed: 12/27/2006 Watkins Creek Ranch Gallatin MT Property Name County State N/A Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. / Signatu^e/cof the Keeper Da&e 6f Action / U =====7I^== Amended Items in Nomination: Description: The correct Town, Range, Section notation in the first paragraph should read: Range 4 Easf. The sawed ends of the corner logs on the Isabel & Frederick Lincoln Cabin (Building #9) are not tapered, as they are on the similar Guest Duplex Cabins (#6-8), marking the slightly different form and details of the later cabin. These clarifications were confirmed with the MT SHPO office. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NFS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Oct. 1990) National Park Service RECEIVED 2280 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 3 NAT PF<N MATIAMAI OADl/ irK'k/rJ-" uco iiniruiiriL i nilM OLIIVILC 1. Name of Property historic name: Watkins Creek Ranch other name/site number: Firehole Ranch 2. Location street & number: 1207 Firehole Ranch Road not for publication: n/a vicinity: n/a city/town: West Yellowstone state: Montana code: MT county: Gallatin code: 031 zip code: 59758 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 0 Vol 6, No 3 |Ey SPRING 1993 Newslettar of the Llontana Natlve Plant Srclety
    --'-'-- Kelseya uniflora cI 0 Vol 6, No 3 |ey SPRING 1993 Newslettar of the llontana Natlve Plant Srclety Type Localities and the Botanical Exploration of Montana - Peter Lesica lf you're a member of the Montana Native Plant Society, you're colfections of blanketflower (Gaillardia aristata), balsamroot probably getting usad to hearing plants referred to by their (Balsamorhiza sagittata), silvery lupine (Lupinus argenteusl and scientific name. Even though the/re often long and hard to mountain death-camas (Zgadenus elegans) - not bad for a da/s pronounce, perhaps you're even becoming convinced that they're work. Two weeks later he found scarlet globe-mallow useful. But where do these names come from, and how do (Sphaeralcea coccinea) near the Marias River in Toole County. taxonomists know what name clrrec.tly applies to which plant? Another early explorer in western Montana was Nathaniel When spotted knapweed first appeared in North America, how did Wyeth. He made a number of type collections from what he said taxonomists know that it was a European weed, Centaurea was the vicinity of the Flathead River. Among these were maculosa, instead of something else - perhaps an undescribed Columbia virgin's-bower (Clematis columbiana), low larkspur species? Taxonomy rests on a system of standards: for each (Delphinium bicololl and Wyeth's lupine (Luprnus wyethiil. He species that is described new to science, there is a type also made the first collections of white-head mule's-ears and specimen. This type specimen represents what the ta,ronomist northern mu le's-ears (Wy eth i a am pl e x i cau I i s artd W.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Travel Corridors:The Driving Routes of Nonresident Visitors Based on Overnight Location and State Entry Point
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Publications Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research 1-1-2013 Montana Travel Corridors:The Driving Routes of Nonresident Visitors based on Overnight Location and State Entry Point Christine Oschell The University of Montana-Missoula Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/itrr_pubs Part of the Leisure Studies Commons, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons, and the Tourism and Travel Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Oschell, Christine, "Montana Travel Corridors:The Driving Routes of Nonresident Visitors based on Overnight Location and State Entry Point" (2013). Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Publications. 94. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/itrr_pubs/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Montana Travel Corridors: The Driving Routes of Nonresident Visitors based on Overnight Location and State Entry Point Research Report 2013-12 Prepared by: Christine Oschell, Ph.D. Institute for Tourism & Recreation Research College of Forestry and Conservation The University of Montana Missoula, MT 59812
    [Show full text]
  • Haystack Development
    August 2, 2017 HAYSTACK DEVELOPMENT Moonlight Basin Overall Development Plan Wildlife Summary Report HAYSTACK DEVELOPMENT Wildlife Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 EXISTING WILDLIFE AND HABITAT ..................................................................................... 4 2.1 HABITAT ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES ......................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Grizzly Bear .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Canada Lynx ......................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Wolverine ............................................................................................................................ 10 2.3 OTHER SPECIES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................ 10 2.3.1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need .............................................................................. 10 2.3.2 Migratory Birds ................................................................................................................... 13 2.3.3 Big Game Species
    [Show full text]
  • 2 CURRENT HEBGEN LAKE ZONING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2002 David Klatt, Chairman Gibson Bailey Dee Rothschiller Linda Blank Bob Lindst
    CURRENT HEBGEN LAKE ZONING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2002 David Klatt, Chairman Gibson Bailey Dee Rothschiller Linda Blank Bob Lindstrom ORIGINAL HEBGEN LAKE ZONING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1976 Richard W. Drew, Chairman Dean L. Nelson David Rightenour Raymond G. Carkeek E. L. Spainhower Daniel C. McDonald Steven Trimble Howard A. Micklewright Roland Whitman Rob Klatt - Project Coordinator GALLATIN COUNTY COMISSIONERS, 2004 John Vincent, Chairman Bill Murdock Jennifer Smith Mitchell The preparation of this plan was financed, in part, through an urban planning grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development under provisions of Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954 as amended. The revision and update of this plan was financed, in part, by Gallatin County, the Sonoran Institute, the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, the West Yellowstone Community Foundation, and the West Yellowstone Foundation. f:\zone\HL\hebgen.pn 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Goals and Objectives………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………...7 Population ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Land Use ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..10 Weather and Climate ………………………………………………………………………………………..15 Soils …………………………………………………………………………………………………………...18 Geology………………………………………………………………………………………………………..29 Topography – Slope and Vegetative Cover ………………………………………………………………35 Fish and Wildlife ……………………………………………………………………………………………..39 Water Resources……………………………………………………………………………………………..47 Ecological Evaluations ….................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gallatin Forest Partnership Frequently Asked Questions
    Gallatin Forest Partnership Frequently Asked Questions What is the Gallatin Forest Partnership? The Gallatin Forest Partnership is a group of local conservationists, hunters, anglers, mountain bikers, horseback riders, guest ranchers, skiers, paddlers, and citizens who care deeply about the Gallatin and Madison Ranges. We come from different backgrounds and have different perspectives. Still, we work together because we’ve seen for ourselves that it is how we can find real-life solutions. In 2018, after over a year of work, the Partnership reached agreement on a shared vision for the future of the Madison and Gallatin Ranges. We submitted the Gallatin Forest Partnership Agreement to the Custer Gallatin National Forest for consideration as it determines how to manage the Forest for the next 20 to 30 years. What is the Gallatin Forest Partnership Agreement all about? The agreement maps out a future for the Gallatin and Madison Ranges that protects the wildlife, clean water, wilderness, and recreation opportunities that are important to all of us. The agreement calls for a unique package of land management designations. These include recommended wilderness, watershed and recreation protections, and wildlife management areas spanning hundreds of thousands of acres in the Gallatin and Madison Ranges. Who supports the Agreement? Since it was released in 2018, over 800 individuals and 100 organizations and businesses have endorsed the agreement, including the Park, Gallatin, and Madison County Commissions. Mountain bikers, hunters, anglers, equestrians, conservationists, businesses, guest ranchers, and many others have signed on, because we all recognize that the agreement provides a real road map to protect what makes the Gallatin and Madison Ranges special.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report on the COVER Wolverine Tracks in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Wolverine Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report ON THE COVER Wolverine tracks in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Photo by Jason Wilmot. Wolverine Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report Authors John Squires Kerry Murphy US Forest Service US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Jackson Ranger District 800 East Beckwith Avenue PO Box 25 Missoula, Montana 59801 Jackson, Wyoming 83001 [email protected] [email protected] (formerly Yellowstone Center for Resources, With contributions from Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming) Robert M. Inman Wildlife Conservation Society Jason Wilmot Wolverine Program Field Office Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative 222 East Main Street PO Box 2705 Lone Elk 3B Jackson, Wyoming 83001 Ennis, Montana 59729 [email protected] [email protected] Jeff Copeland Mark L. Packila US Forest Service Wildlife Conservation Society Rocky Mountain Research Station Wolverine Program Field Office 800 East Beckwith Avenue 222 East Main Street Missoula, Montana 59801 Lone Elk 3B [email protected] Ennis, Montana 59729 [email protected] Dan Tyers US Forest Service Doug McWhirter Gardiner Ranger District Wyoming Game and Fish Regional Office PO Box 5 2820 State Highway 120 Gardiner, Montana 59030 Cody, Wyoming 82414 [email protected] National Park Service Yellowstone National Park Yellowstone Center for Resources Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-2011-02 March 2011 Suggested citation: Murphy, K., J. Wilmot, J. Copeland, D. Tyers, J. Squires, R. M. Inman, M. L. Packila, D. McWhirter. 2011. Wolverine conservation in Yellowstone National Park: Final report. YCR-2011-02. National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents I. Foreword
    TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FOREWORD................................................................................................................ 4 II. REGIONAL SETTING................................................................................................. 5 III. EXISTING LAND USES............................................................................................. 7 IV. DISTRICT HISTORY ................................................................................................. 9 A. THE BIG SKY, INC. "MASTER PLAN" ................................................ 11 B. 1972 GALLATIN CANYON STUDY..................................................... 11 V. POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................... 13 VI. INFRASTRUCTURE................................................................................................ 18 A. UTILITIES............................................................................................ 18 1. Wastewater Treatment.............................................................. 18 2. Water Distribution...................................................................... 19 3. Electric And Telephone Service ................................................ 19 B. TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................... 20 1. Streets And Highways............................................................... 20 2. Air Service................................................................................. 20
    [Show full text]
  • MONTANA N7 4Qea
    E 12, p( /F- o77 (r 2) Sf(jji PGJ/F-077(82) National Uranium Resource Evaluation 6 BOZEMAN QUADRANGLE 41 MONTANA n7 4QeA/ University of Montana Missoula, Montana and Montana State University Bozeman, Montana E2T oFi Issue Date August 1982 SATESO9 PREPARED FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Grand Junction Area Office, Colorado rmetadc957781 Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report is a result of work performed by the University of Montana and Montana State University, through a Bendix Field Engineering Corporation subcontract, as part of the National Uranium Resource Evaluation. NURE was a program of the U.S. Department of Energy's Grand Junction, Colorado, Office to acquire and compile geologic and other information with which to assess the magnitude and distribution of uranium resources and to determine areas favorable for the occurrence of uranium in the United States. Available from: Technical Library Bendix Field Engineering Corporation P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1898 Field Season of CD Walcott
    Field work and fossils in southwestern Montana: the 1898 field season of C. D. Walcott Ellis L. Yochelson Research Associate, Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013-7012 G. Zieg Senior Geologist, Teck Cominco American Inc., East 15918 Euclid, Spokane, WA 99216 INTRODUCTION In 1879, Charles Doolittle Walcott (1850- 1927) (Yochelson, 1998) joined the new U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) and July 1, 1894, became the third director of the agency. Shortly before that time the USGS had several field parties starting to investigate mining dis- tricts in Montana and Idaho. There was no overall stratigraphic succession, nor clear cor- relation from one mining district to another. In 1895, Walcott took a first quick trip through the Belt Mountains. In the vicinity of Neihart, Montana, he collected Middle Cambrian fossils (Weed, 1900). These fossils established that Lower Cambrian rocks were absent from the area and thus the Belt strata (or Algonkian, as USGS Walcott called them) were pre-Cambrian in age The unhyphenated usage and the lack of capi- ABSTRACT talization of “formation” are relatively late de- velopments in stratigraphic nomenclature. The diary of Charles Doolittle Walcott pro- vides a brief daily account of his investigations For more than fifty years, Walcott used a small of Cambrian and Precambrian rocks, mainly in pocket diary and with his comments one can the Belt Mountains during one field season. trace his route and gain some notion of how These entries also give some notion of the tri- field work was conducted before the days of als of field work before the development of the rapid automobile transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Geology of the Northern Snowcrest Range, Beaverhead and Madison Counties, Montana
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-1984 Structural Geology of the Northern Snowcrest Range, Beaverhead and Madison Counties, Montana Mark Kenneth Sheedlo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Sheedlo, Mark Kenneth, "Structural Geology of the Northern Snowcrest Range, Beaverhead and Madison Counties, Montana" (1984). Master's Theses. 1571. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1571 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN SNOWCREST RANGE, BEAVERHEAD AND MADISON COUNTIES, MONTANA by Mark Kenneth Sheedlo A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fu lfillm e n t of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Geology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 1984 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN SNOWCREST RANGE, BEAVERHEAD AND MADISON COUNTIES, MONTANA Mark Kenneth Sheedlo, M.S. Western Michigan University, 1984 The Snowcrest Range was uplifted in Late Cretaceous and Early •Tertiary time as a consequence of thrusting in Precambrian basement and Phanerozoic cover rocks. The Snowcrest-Greenhorn thrust system is associated with large- scale overturned, eastward verging folds. Mean orientation of the thrust system is N.40°E., 35°N.W.. The trend of the thrust system and associated transverse faults appear to be controlled by earlier structures.
    [Show full text]
  • COVER Page Data for Quaternary Faults in Western Montana
    COVER Page Data for Quaternary faults in western Montana by Kathleen M. Haller, Richard L. Dart, Michael N. Machette, and Michael C. Stickney CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 STRATEGY FOR DATA COMPILATION ............................................................................................................ 1 EXPLANATION OF PRIMARY DATA FIELDS................................................................................................... 2 HISTORICAL SEISMICITY.................................................................................................................................... 3 HEBGEN LAKE EARTHQUAKE..................................................................................................................................... 4 SYNOPSIS OF QUATERNARY FAULTING IN WESTERN MONTANA......................................................... 5 LIST OF CONTRIBUTING INDIVIDUALS .......................................................................................................... 7 DEFINITION OF DATABASE TERMS.................................................................................................................. 2 FAULT AND FOLD DATABASE ............................................................................................................................ 5 606, DEADMAN FAULT (CLASS A)............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]