The Effects of Maltreatment on Neuroendocrine Regulation And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F. A., Howe, M. L. and Toth, S. L. (2010). The Effects of Maltreatment and Neuroendocrine Regulation on Memory Performance. Child Development, 81(5), pp. 1504-1519. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01488.x This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/4209/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01488.x Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] The Effects of Maltreatment and Neuroendocrine Regulation on Memory Performance Dante Cicchetti Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota Fred A. Rogosch Mt. Hope Family Center, University of Rochester Mark L. Howe Lancaster University Sheree L. Toth Mt. Hope Family Center, University of Rochester IN PRESS: Child Development Abstract This investigation examined basic memory processes, cortisol, and dissociation in maltreated children. School-aged children, 143 maltreated and 174 nonmaltreated, were administered the California Verbal Learning Test – Children (Delis, Kramer, Kaplan, & Ober, 1994) in a week-long camp setting, daily morning cortisol levels were assessed throughout the duration of camp, and behavioral symptoms were evaluated. Maltreatment and cortisol regulation were not related to short- or long-delay recall or recognition memory. However, children experiencing neglect/emotional maltreatment and low cortisol evinced heightened false recognition memory. Dissociative symptoms were higher in maltreated children; however, high dissociation was related to recognition inaccuracy only among nonmaltreated children. Results highlight the interplay between maltreatment and hypocortisolism in children’s recognition memory errors. Do maltreated children’s basic memory processes operate in ways that are fundamentally different from those of nonmaltreated children? Despite the importance that answers to this question hold for advancing research, clinical, and socio-legal issues in the field of child maltreatment (Howe, 2000; Howe, Goodman, & Cicchetti, 2008; Howe, Toth, & Cicchetti, 2006; Toth & Cicchetti, 1998), there has been a paucity of studies, most of which have been published in recent years, that have examined basic memory processes in maltreated children (Howe, Cicchetti, & Toth, 2006). Child Maltreatment and Memory There are a number of reasons why the experience of child maltreatment might be expected to alter basic memory processes (Howe, Toth, & Cicchetti, 2006). Child abuse and neglect are stressful and threatening experiences that may bring about physiological changes in the neural mechanisms related to memory storage (Bremner & Narayan, 1998; Cicchetti, Rogosch, Gunnar, & Toth, in press; Howe, Cicchetti, & Toth, 2006). Moreover, a number of the socioemotional sequelae of child maltreatment, including the development of insecure, often disorganized, attachment relationships and deviations in symbolic and representational abilities (Cicchetti & Toth, 2005), may affect the processing of memories in abused and neglected children (Lynch & Cicchetti, 1998; Pollak, Cicchetti, & Klorman, 1998; Rieder & Cicchetti, 1989). In addition, it is conceivable that failures in caregiving may lead maltreated children either to defensively distort memories or to dissociate their memories of their abusive and neglectful experiences (Cicchetti & Valentino, 2006). Finally, maltreated children are at heightened risk for the development of trauma-related psychopathology, including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and dissociation, that may contribute to deficits in memory performance (Cicchetti & Toth, 2005; Howe, Toth, & Cicchetti, 2006). The majority of the investigations on the effects of maltreatment experiences on memory have focused on examinations of adults who retrospectively report having been abused during their childhoods, adults with PTSD, nonmaltreated children participating in analog experiments, or individuals with relatively acute and/or routine stressors involving treatment for accidental injuries or visits to physicians’ offices (Howe, 2000; Toth & Cicchetti, 1998). Among the studies of memory in adults who report having been maltreated, several investigations have used the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm (Deese, 1959; Roediger-McDermott, 1995) to examine false memories in adults who report having been maltreated in childhood and in adults who did not experience maltreatment (for a review, see Howe, Toth, & Cicchetti, 2006). Each of these investigations found that adults who report histories of maltreatment evinced a higher frequency of false recognition memory errors (i.e., inaccurately recognizing words not previously presented as heard) than did nonmaltreated comparison individuals. Despite the fact that there have been relatively few studies of basic memory processes in maltreated children conducted to date, a review of the extant literature reveals that the experience of child abuse and neglect does not appear to exert any special effects on memory that fundamentally change the operation of memory from that observed in nonmaltreated children (Howe, Toth, & Cicchetti, 2006). For example, no differences have been found in investigations of maltreated children’s memory for eyewitnessed events or in their degree of susceptibility to misinformation and suggestion, unless accompanying comorbid psychopathology is present (Eisen, Goodman, Qin, & Davis, 2002; Eisen, Goodman, Qin, Davis, & Crayton, 2007; Howe, Toth, & Cicchetti, 2006). In an investigation of true and false recall memory in maltreated children, Howe, Cicchetti, Toth, and Cerrito (2004) examined the memory performances of maltreated and nonmaltreated children on the DRM task. The same pattern of results was found regardless of maltreatment status. Consistent with the normative literature on false memory (Brainerd & Reyna, 2005), both maltreated and nonmaltreated children exhibited false recognition memories and memory inaccuracies with age at the same rate. Similarly, Porter, Lawson, and Bigler (2005) found no significant differences in memory function between sexually abused and nonabused children, despite elevations in psychopathology and diminished performance on measures of attention and executive function for the abused group. Additionally, Beers and DeBellis (2002) did not find any between group differences in basic memory processes for maltreated children and adolescents with PTSD and normative comparison youth. Overall, because these investigations focused on group differences, studies that examine within group differences might yield different results. Not all maltreated individuals are equally affected by their traumatic experiences (Cicchetti & Toth, 2005). Thus, investigations of basic memory processes in children who have experienced sexual and physical abuse, neglect, and emotional maltreatment are warranted. Toward this end, a depth-of-processing incidental recall task was used to examine self- relevant information among maltreated children and the relation between maltreatment and false recall on dissociation (Valentino, Cicchetti, Rogosch, & Toth, 2008b). Abused, neglected, and nonmaltreated children all demonstrated better recall for words when words were encoded under self-referent conditions rather than under structural conditions. These results suggest that self- representations serve as an organizing schema for memory and may be used to facilitate recall (cf. Howe, 1998, 2000). Consistent with prior research (Howe et al., 2004), differences were not found among abused, neglected, or nonmaltreated children in the occurrence or total amount of false recall errors. Maltreated children were not rendered more or less susceptible to false recall errors (cf. Howe et al., 2004). Notably, however, the younger group of neglected children demonstrated a greater proportion of negative false recall errors and less positive recall than did the younger abused children, suggesting a greater vulnerability for memory inaccuracy among neglected children. Among the older group, both abused and neglected children demonstrated less positive false recall than did the nonmaltreated children. Negative self-schemas were associated with increased dissociation among the abused children, whereas positive self-schemas were related to increased dissociation for the neglected children. In addition to addressing the role of dissociation on memory, it also is important to attend to possible neurobiological influences. HPA Axis Functioning and Memory Child abuse and neglect are stressful and threatening experiences that create adaptational challenges (Cicchetti & Rogosch, 2001a; DeBellis, 2001; Hart, Gunnar, & Cicchetti, 1996). One of the physiological systems that has evolved in mammals to help direct