<<

United States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: 4,643,900

Porter [45] Date of Patent: Feb. 17 3 1987

[54] METHOD FOR MAKING PRODUCTS OTHER PUBLICATIONS _ , Furia et a1, Fenaroli’s Handbook of Ingredients, [75] Invenm“ R” W- PM“, 131m“, Cahf- vol. I, 2nd ed., 1975, CRC Press: Cleveland, pp. [73] Assignee: Basic American Foods, San 196_l_97' _ _ _ Francisco’ Calif' Pruthl Spices and Condiments, 1980, Academic Press: New York, pp. 200-201. [21] Appl' No': “L707 Primary Examiner-Joseph Golian [22] Filed: Oct. 17, 1984 Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Sandler & Greenblum [51] Int. Cl.‘‘ ...... A21D 2/36 [57] ABSTRACT [52] US. Cl...... 426/21; 426/658; A method for producing bakery products is provided _ 426/549; 426/19 wherein a conditioner composition of allium [58] Field of Search ...... 426/549, 653, 19, 21, material is incorporated into dough formulations‘ in_ 426/62 eluding , and leavening agents. The allium [56] References Cited material is used in effective amounts to function in re ducing the mix-time required to develop a dough, in U-s- PATENT DOCUMENTS creasing the absorption of water by the flour during 2,883,285 4/ 1959 Lubig . dough development, and increasing the extensibility of 3,053,666 9/1962 Henika et al. . the dough. The preferred allium material used in the 3,537,863 11/1970 Sinnott . preparation of the dough improving composition is 3,556,805 1/1971 Conn et al. . garlic, more preferably in a dehydrated form and in 3,594,131 7/ 1971 Alp!" - combination with an inert organic material. The devel 3’5951671 7/1971 Cooke ‘it al- - oped dough is processed using conventional techniques 3’615’679 10/1971 Tangel at 3]‘ ' and procedures including baking into a standard bakery 3 617 305 11/1971 Rolland . 3’667’963 6/1972 Kaner et'a]. I products such as , crackers, pizza and sweet 3:679:433 7/1972 Pomeranz etal. . g°°d$ 3,803,326 4/1974 Craig eta]. . 3,876,815 4/1975 Kurzuis . 12 Claims, N0 Drawings 4,643,900 1 2 dough development processes was introduced about 20 METHOD FOR MAKING BAKERY PRODUCTS years ago to the baking industry by the Bread Research Institute of Australia with their Brimee Mixer. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Since then, most of the effort expended in attempting 1. Field of the Invention to improve dough-making have concentrated on meth The present invention relates to farinaceous and amy ods for chemically developing the dough. One of the laceous products. In general, it is directed to improve ?rst of such chemical modi?cation methods which was ments in the production of batter and dough products. put into commercial practice is disclosed in U.S. Pat. The invention involves the use of a natural food mate No. 3,053,666 and involves the use of certain reducing rial as an active agent. More particularly, it involves the compounds, such as compounds, incorporation of allium material, preferably dehydrated and sodium bisul?te, as activating agents. All of these garlic, as a into standard dough for compounds are sulphur-containing reducing agents. mulations in amounts effective in functioning to reduce Small amounts of one or more of these agents were the mix-time required to develop a dough. In addition found to be effective in accelerating the development of dehydrated garlic increases absorption of water by the 5 proper dough consistency and to improve the extensi ?our during dough development, and improves the bility of the dough. Compounds related or homologous extensibility of the dough. Upon subsequent processing thereto were also found to be effective. In addition, and baking, the resultant product exhibits organoleptic materials such as inactive dry , unheated soy flour, characteristics generally expected of such products. etc., were found to be useful as sources of cysteine 2. Description of the Prior Art 20 and/or glutathione. In combination with such com~ Flour-base dough products, such as bread, are one of pounds, conventional oxidizing agents, such as potas the basic food groups of a good, nutritional, well sium bromate, were used as maturing agents. It was balanced diet. The art of bread-making has been prac found that the combination of such agents was neces ticed for thousands of years. Raised bread and similar bakery products are normally prepared from a dough sary in order to obtain optimum extensibility and gas containing , water, leavening agents, such as retention with good loaf volume and grain quality in a yeast and yeast nutrients, and additionally shortening, process for mixing a dough without a fermentation step. and salt. The dough ingredients are mixed, fermented Since the introduction of the Reddi-Sponge TM prod and kneaded until a viscoelastic dough is developed uct, there have been numerous attempts using various prior to baking. This basic bakery method, commonly chemical compounds to improve dough making. In referred to as the “straight-dough” method, was ini accordance with the disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. tially used by to commercially produce bread 3,556,805, compositions comprising , salts and rolls. thereof or an ester of fumaric acid having from ?ve to The industry uses what is referred to as a “no-time” nine carbon atoms are disclosed as reducing the mixing straight-dough system to commercially produce pizza requirements in the development of bread dough. and certain crackers. In such cases, it is prevalent to use U.S. Pat. No. 3,617,305 relates to an additive compo reducing agents as dough conditioners. Sodium sul?te sition comprising de?ned amounts of an ascorbate com and L-cysteine are routinely used at relatively high pound, an edible oxidizing agent and an edible sulfhy concentrations to accelerate the development of the dryl containing reducing agent for use in yeast-raised dough dough products. Currently in the United States most bread and rolls U.S. Pat. No. 3,876,805 is directed to improved whey are produced by the sponge-dough method wherein the protein concentrates, both water soluble and fermentation of the sponge is utilized to mellow the reactive, which are particularly suitable for use in the gluten to where it can be mixed and fully developed in bakery industry as dough developers and conditioners. a reasonable time and yet exhibits acceptable extensibil 45 U.S. Pat. No. 3,595,671 is also directed to reducing ity for purposes of machining volume purposes. the mixing time in continuous dough-making processes Oxidizing agents are commonly employed in conven~ by the use of de?ned amounts of chemical additives in tional bread and roll production to ?x the volume ob the form of a combination of an acceptable food grade tained during proo?ng and baking. , sulfhydryl-containing reducing agent, anti-oxidant, and L-Cysteine and sodium sul?te are typically used to oxidizing improver, respectively, preferred to be L modify the gluten of dough in order to reduce mix-time Cysteine hydrochloride, isoascorbic acid and a bro and increase the extensibility of the dough. mate. There has been considerable effort devoted to short Although each of these processes has been more or ening the overall time required for bread preparation less successful in commercial procedures for making and reducing the number and inconvenience of the bread, there has been a growing aversion to and con operating steps in commercial baking procedures. In cern for the use of chemical additives, particularly those what is commonly referred to as “continuous-mix” containing sodium and sul?tes, in processed foods. baking operations, the prefermentation step is substan Prior attempts to use natural food materials as im tially reduced or eliminated from the “straight” and proving agents for dough products are exempli?ed by “sponge-dough” methods. In commercial practice, con U.S. Pat. No. 3,594,181 which discloses that commi tinuous-mix processes were initially effected using ma nuted non-toxic plants of the Cruciferae, Resedaceae, chinery manufactured by Wallace and Tierman Inc., Capparidaceae, or Tropacolaceae families are useful as referred to as the Do-Maker Equipment, or by Bakery a cysteine substitute. Machinery Division, American Machine and Foundry Along this line, U.S. Pat. No. 2,819,168 is directed to Company, referred to as the Amflow Equipment. The 65 incorporating the separated germ or husk of raw, legu next major commercial development was what is minous seeds or an extract of the germ or husk into one known as the Chorleywood Process developed in En or more of the substances employed in carrying out the gland. The last of the major commercial, mechanical production of bread. 4,643,900 3 4 U.S. Pat. No. 1,479,592, discloses the addition of or the like. The preferred amount of garlic chips to be onions to yeast fermentation during formation of the added is two tablespoons (% of a cup) which equates to yeast. It is believed that by doing so the life of the yeast about 5 of the volume of starter. is extended without an excessive growth of bacteria Notwithstanding such use of garlic material as a ?a therein. It is disclosed that boiled onions are added to voring material in making various foods including gar sour dough which is allowed to stand for a time during lic bread, it is not believed that allium material has here which spontaneous fermentation will continue in the tofore been used as a dough additive to reduce the mix dough with the onions acting as an agent to retard the time of dough development and increase the extensibil activity of the growth of the yeast to thereby form a ity of the dough, in a manner similar to cysteine, gluta yeast which will remain active for extended periods of thione, protease enzymes, sul?tes and other recognized time. agents for such purposes. U.S. Pat. No. 3,679,433, discloses the addition of small amounts of naturally occurring or synthetic gly SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION colipids to dough formulations containing added pro The present invention is primarily directed to the use tein concentrates from plant or animal sources. This is of allium material as a dough developer and conditioner done to permit the enrichment of baked products with in reducing the mixing time required to fully develop high levels of protein concentrates and thereby improve the gluten during dough formation, providing a condi the baking qualities thereof. tioning of the dough to give it better handling and ma U.S. Pat. No. 3,803,326, discloses a process for bread chining properties, as well as improved extensibility, making involving the addition of a composition consist 20 without adversely affecting volume, grain, texture, ing of a mixture of amino acid reducing substances symmetry and overall appearance in the resultant bread containing free sulfhydryl groups, dried whey, ascorbic or baked goods product. acid and dried soya protein to conventional dough in As previously discussed, baking procedures may re gredients. It is disclosed that materials such as inactive quire either prolonged fermentation and/or manipula dry yeast, unheated soya ?our, or other natural foods tion to develop essential dough characteristics, or the may be used as sources of cysteine and/or glutathione. use of excessive mechanical force or arti?cial and syn Related to such concern for the use of natural ingre thetic chemical additives to obtain desired dough vis dients in bread-like baked goods, U.S. Pat. No. cosities and a rapid development of the dough. In con 2,883,285 discloses a procedure comprising fermenting trast, the present invention involves the discovery of a mixture of ground cereal, water, plant extract material heretofore unrecognized properties in certain naturally 1 and flour, which has been subjected to elevated temper occurring food materials which function in a similar atures of 100° C. while being exposed to radiation. manner to known developing and conditioning dough ' Phosphatides, preferably provided by the juice of on additives. ions and garlic, may be added to the mixture being The advantages of the present invention are realized fermented, which is thereafter extruded into molds and by using an additive which is derived from naturally baked at 160" C. for about four hours to result with a occurring materials of recognized edibility acceptable bread-like baked goods product. to consumers. These materials are particularly useful in Garlic, however, is normally considered to be a food procedures and compositions used in the production of which is often included in dough products, such as baked goods. More particularly, it has been discovered bread and the like, as a ?avor ingredient. Representa 40 that allium material is an effective additive which func tive of such use of garlic as ?avoring is U.S. Pat. No. tions as an active agent at least as well as various arti?c 3,615,679, which includes garlic in a pizza dough which ial or synthetic chemical compounds commonly incor is partially baked, and then frozen. The frozen pizza is porated into dough for their conditioning and mix-time capable of preparation for consumption in a toaster. reducing effect. U.S. Pat. No. 3,667,963, is directed to a pizza, or 45 Onion and garlic, notably the latter, have been found similar food product, prepared by slicing a baked roll to be particularly suitable allium material for use in the and applying a sealing layer of garlic-?avored marga process of the present invention. Although freshly rine to the soft interior surface of the roll. ground, crushed tissue or juice may be used, particu U.S. Pat. No. 3,876,815, relates to a process for mak larly good results are achieved when a dehydrated al ing pretzels. It is disclosed that onions can be used to lium product, such as dehydrated garlic granules, pow ?avor the dough used in making soft pretzels. der or agglomerates, is used. U.S. Pat. No. 3,537,863, is directed to a method of The present invention thus ?nds utility in modifying making garlic bread in which the garlic ?avor is pre any conventional dough development procedure in served during baking. It is disclosed that a critical step cluding straight or sponge-dough techniques, as well as in the preservation of the garlic ?avor is to add the brew or broth methods. garlic at about the time of after all other ingre The present invention, however, is also useful in the dients have been mixed together and just prior to bak production of all types of farinaceous and amylaceous ing. Another critical factor is that the garlic should be products. added in a dry form. The disclosed theory. of this action Thus, an object of the present invention is the provi is that the flavor of the dry, dehydrated garlic is acti 60 sion of an ingredient mix containing farinaceous and vated by the moisture or steam created during the bak amylaceous materials and a functional amount of allium ing process so that the development of ?avor is com material. plete at the same time that the baking is completed. The A further object of the present invention is the provi bread is disclosed as coming from the oven with full, sion of a dry mix, including farinaceous and amylaceous fresh garlic ?avor which is evenly distributed through 65 materials, and a functional amount of allium material, out the entire loaf. The term garlic “chips” is de?ned as for use in making batter and dough products. including dehydrated, dry garlic ?akes and dehydrated, Another object of the present invention is a method dry minced garlic, but does not include garlic powder for making batter or dough products from a mix con 4,643,900 5 6 taining farinaceous and amylaceous materials, a func mixture of dough ingredients is normally subjected to tional amount of allium material and water. prolonged mixing and kneading steps. During the pro And yet a further object of the present invention is a cess of kneading, which is effected by a deliberate and method of using functional amounts of allium material regular action, the yeast is evenly distributed and the in the production of products including biscuits, muf dough developed so as to give a uniform, texturized ?ns, such as English muf?ns, buns, rolls, crackers, pret ?nal product. Conventionally, the dough so obtained is zels, pizza shells or crust, pie dough, wheat flour torti permitted to ferment and to expand for prolonged peri llas, sweet goods, cake, cookies, pastry, puffed pastry, ods of time, commonly on the order of two to three croissants, bread-sticks, pancakes, waffles and pasta hours or longer. products, in addition to various kinds of and the In addition to the modi?cation of the physical prop like. erties of dough to improve its ability to hold gas during The present invention preferably results with a flour baking, and the production of the gas to raise and leaven base dough product comprising an additive made from the loaf, it is generally recognized that bulk fermenta allium material in an amount effective to function as a tion is also responsible for the formation of fermentation dough improver preferably without contributing a no products which contribute to the ?avor of the bread. ticeably perceptible ?avor to the product. Although it After the initial or bulk fermentation, the dough has been discovered that dehydrated garlic when used batch is usually punched three times at about 50-minute in an amount in the range of up to about 0.5% by weight intervals and scaled or divided into individual units for of ?our, and preferably up to about 0.3% by weight make-up into loaves, rolls, buns and the like. This basic flour is an effective amount to achieve the aforemen method of dough development is commonly referred to tioned results, it is more preferred to include dehy as the “straight-dough” method. drated garlic in the range of about 0.01 to 0.3% by The “sponge-dough” method initially forms what is weight of flour. The most preferred range of dehy commonly referred to as a “sponge”, from a mixture of drated garlic which is functional in reducing the mix a portion of the dough ingredients, which is permitted time to fully develop is 0.01 to 0.05% by Weight 25 to ferment. After the desired degree of fermentation is of flour whereas 0.05 to 0.25% by weight of flour is effected, the sponge is mixed with remaining dough most preferred for improving the extensibility of the ingredients for further processing much the same as in dough. the straight dough method subsequent to fermentation. The processing and handling characteristics of dehy The primary advantage of the sponge-dough method in drated garlic are improved for purposes of the present 30 comparison with the straight-dough method is that it invention when the garlic is formed into a composition produces a bread which is generally recognized as man with an inert material such as a diluent or carrier. Or ifesting superior quality. ganic materials such as malto-dextrin or wheat starch A method allowing continuous dough preparation are preferred for such purpose. The composition may involves ?rst forming a broth or brew from a mixture of be formed by dry-blending or co-drying the garlic and 35 ingredients including water, sugar, yeast, yeast nutri the inert material in desired proportions. Proportions of ents, buffering agents and vitamin enrichment agents. dehydrated garlic to malto-dextrin or wheat starch in The mix may also include a small amount of flour and the composition may range from 1:9 to 9:1 with 1:1 to non-fat dry milk. After the broth is prepared, it is fer 1:7 being a preferred range. mented for about two and one-half hours and then 40 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE pumped to a blender where it is mildly mixed with INVENTION ?our, fat and oxidizing agents in desired proportions. Mixing is on a continuous basis. The resultant loosely The present invention shall be described in detail for mixed batter is pumped to a mixer where the dough is the preparation of bakery dough products such as forced through an aperture within which an agitator is bread. Regardless of the process used in the preparation 45 operated at high speeds to thoroughly mix all of the of such products, it is critical to properly develop the ingredients and to completely hydrate and develop the dough. This is primarily a result of the protein of wheat protein or the gluten of the flour. Typically, a dough ?our, which is gluten, becoming hydrated and forming structure is developed in a continuous-mix operation elastic ?lms. Wetting the ?our during dough-making within 30-90 seconds thereby completely eliminating permits the gluten protein to absorb water and to swell the slow hydration of gluten which normally requires a thereby weakening some of the intermolecular forces four to ?ve hour prefermentation step in the more con holding the adjacent protein chains together. As mixing ventional batch-type bread making processes. proceeds, the protein chains are stretched and unwound The present invention is particularly applicable to the and by means of interchange reactions between disul dough development stage of conventional baking pro ?de bonds under stress and adjacent sulfhydryl groups, cedures although dehydrated garlic also functions in a network of protein chains is developed. accordance with the objects of the present invention The formation of this network in conventional bread when added to the ingredients during formation of the making procedures, such as those using yeast fermenta sponge or the broth. tion, proceeds during mixing and fermentation until the For the purposes of the present invention, allium dough is properly developed, i.e., until optimum gas 60 material such as dehydrated garlic is added to an other retention properties are achieved. This is effected by the wise standard formulation made up of the usual amounts resultant elastic ?lms which entrap the gas evolved by and types of ingredients, preferably including leavening the leavening process which causes the bread to raise as agents. The difference from conventional formulations, the gas expands. As fermentation proceeds, the dough however, is the use of allium material in amounts effec becomes extensible and elastic so that the resultant ?lm 65 tive to function as a dough conditioner without impart can hold entrapped gases in the form of bubbles which ing perceptible taste to the product. do not coalesce during the rapid expansion which oc It has been discovered that the use of allium material curs during baking. In order for a dough to develop, a in amounts up to about 0.5% by weight of the flour 4,643,900 7 8 component of the formulation is effective in functioning cessed into a dehydrated product. In this regard, whole in this way. The allium material functions as a dough allium material, such as garlic, is subjected to heat in conditioner by increasing the absorption of water by the order to elevate the temperature within the tissue pref flour as well as softening and enhancing the machinabil erably to above about 190° F. prior to subdividing the ity of the dough. Its preferred use, however, is to reduce tissue into a preferred form of a puree, piece or particu the mix-time of dough development as well as to in late material which may then be subjected to dehydra crease the extensibility of the dough. In these respects, tion techniques to reduce the moisture content thereof allium may be used to suplement or preferably replace to less than about 15%. Dehydrated garlic in particulate conventional dough conditioning and reducing agents form, such as powder, granules and agglomerates hav such as cysteine, glutathione, sodium sul?te, sodium 0 ing a moisture content within the range of about 3—7%%, bi-sul?te, sodium meta bi-sul?te, and protease enzymes which is substantially devoid of ?avor and odor, is conventionally used in the baking industry for similar preferred for purposes of the present invention from purposes. this standpoint. The allium material preferred for purposes of the It is also preferred to use an additive comprising a ‘ present invention is garlic. It has been found that dehy composition of allium material and a material inert for drated garlic in particulate form such as powder, gran purposes of the present invention. Preferred inert mate ules, or agglomerates thereof is most preferred. The rials for the composition include organic materials such dehydrated garlic used in the present invention can be as malto-dextrin, wheat starch, ?our, and similar diluent produced using any of the conventional dehydration and carrier materials which do not have a functional procedures which are commonly employed by the in effect for purposes of the present invention. The com dustry in making such products. Dehydrated garlic position of allium material and inert material can be products sold by the owner of the present application prepared by conventional dry-blending techniques or under its BASIC® brands is particularly suitable for by co-drying procedures. As to the latter procedure, purpose of the present invention. For example, dehy suitable inert material can be mixed with the garlic drated garlic is typically produced by ?rst dividing 25 puree prior to spray-drying in the production of dehy garlic cloves into slices which are dried to a moisture drated garlic as previously described. The ratio of al content of about 12% prior to grinding to produce a lium material to inert material in the composition may dehydrated granular or powdered garlic product hav range from between 1:9 to 9:1. A more preferred dough ing a moisture content of less than about 7—l0%. Pro improver composition is formulated to have dehydrated cesses for the production of dehydrated garlic are dis garlic and malto-dextrin in a ratio within the range of closed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,258,343, 3,259,504 and 1:1 to 1:7. An advantage of such a dough improver 3,378,380. composition is enhanced metering and processing toler A preferred dehydrated garlic for purposes of the ances. present invention is manufactured and sold by the As used herein, the term “fermentation” includes all owner of the present application under its SUN 35 changes in the dough as a result of the action of yeast or SPICED TM brand. The method for its production chemical agents which function to aerate or otherwise includes grinding garlic cloves into a puree maintained leaven the dough and develop the gluten in the dough. at a temperature of less than about 85° F. prior to dehy For purposes herein, “resting” and “benching” are used dration by a procedure involving spraying the garlic interchangeably to denote periods of time allowed to puree into a drying chamber wherein droplets of puree give the gluten in the dough time to recover from any , are exposed to elevated temperatures to reduce their steps such as dividing, molding, forming, etc., wherein moisture content to within the range of about 8-l5%, the dough has been stretched or worked. The term and ultimately to less than about 7§%. The resultant “proo?ng” is usually the next to the last step in any product is then subjected to size modi?cation by con commercial baking operation which precedes the bak= ventional means effective for such purpose to produce 45 ing step itself. In addition to yeast, a number of other particles including powder, granules and agglomerates. compounds or mixtures of compounds which effec The use of dehydrated garlic in amounts up to about tively produce carbon dioxide gas to aerate the dough 0.5% by weight of ?our have been found to be effective of baked products qualify as “leavening agents”. and functional for purposes of the present invention, A batter or dough is prepared from essential dough with amounts up to about 0.3% being preferred, with ingredients consisting of ?our and water. In addition to out imparting perceptible flavor to the dough product. these, leavening agents are essential ingredients of It is more preferred to use dehydrated garlic in dough raised dough products. Shortenings, milk, sugar and salt formulations for bread, rolls, muf?ns, sweet goods and are also normally used in preparing such products. the like in effective amounts within the range of 0.01 to Doughs as well as batters can also include extraneous 0.25% by weight ?our. In dough formulations for pizza, 55 ingredients such as raisins, nuts, berries, bran and meals crackers and similar goods where a greater degree of from various grains and like products which can be extensibility is desired, it is more preferred to include incorporated into standard formulations for baking as effective amounts of dehydrated garlic in the range of well as other ingredients and additives commonly used about 0.05 to 0.5% by weight flour to result with a in the baking industry. product having desired characteristics. Although wheat ?our is the preferred farinaceous Inasmuch as some a perceptible garlic ?avor is objec- ' material for purposes of the present invention, any of tionable for some bakery products, it is preferred to use the conventional types of ?our commonly used in the allium material which has been treated so as to substan baking trade, such as rye, corn, potato, rice and the like tially eliminate its characteristic odor and ?avor prior can be used. It is critical, however, that neither the ?our to inclusion with dough ingredients in these instances. 65 used nor the dough made therefrom be subjected to any To this end, allium material is subjected to a treatment physical or chemical treatment prior to baking which to permanently inactivate the ?avor-forming compo would denature the gluten or protein content thereof. nents present in its tissue cells before the tissue is pro Otherwise the dough would be incapable of being fully 4,643,900 9 10 - developed to have the requisite characteristics com one pound loaf of bread. During baking, the dough monly expected for raised dough products. expands to the desired loaf volume. For purposes herein, all amounts and percentages of In a straight-dough process, however, all the ingredi ingredients including water are expressed by weight ents, including an effective amount of allium material, based on the farinaceous material being 100%, i.e., are mixed together in one stage. In this procedure, it is (f.b.). Based on ?our being 100%, dough formulations preferred to mix the dry ingredients with the water until which yield acceptable products generally comprise thoroughly dissolved, and then draw in the flour and flour, 100%; water 50-85%; and allium, up to 0.5%. continue mixing until most of the water has been ab Other ingredients which may be used include salt, sorbed. The is then added and the O—3%; sugar, 0—20%; shortening, 0-50%; yeast, dough mixing is completed. The mixed dough is then l-8.0%; milk or milk substitute, 0-5%; as well as suffi permitted to ferment and is subsequently processed cient amounts of , color enhancers, ?avor using standard procedures normally employed in the ing, spices and the like in accordance with good manu industry for making bakery products, such as those facturing practices. Thus it can be seen that doughs described above. prepared according to the present invention comprise The following examples are presented to illustrate the all of the usual dry ingredients, shortenings and leaven various advantages of the present invention. ing agents in amounts conventionally employed in the baking industry. The difference from conventional EXAMPLE I dough formulations, however, is the use of allium mate A comparison of the effects of including dehydrated rial in amounts effective to function as a dough condi 20 garlic and conventional dough conditioning agents on tioner without imparting perceptible taste to the prod reducing the mixing time requirements for complete uct. dough development was made using three conventional The ingredients to be used in the manufacture of bread-making procedures: Sponge-Dough, 40% Flour products in accordance with the present invention Ferment, and Straight-Dough methods. In each case, should be mixed together under ambient conditions 25 batches of bread were made using a typical bread ?our, preferably not exceeding about 90° F. Inasmuch as fer i.e. Sunny Kansas Flour, having a protein content of . mentation occurs as a function of time and temperature, 11.0%, and Seal of Minnesota Flour (12.6% protein) there may be a considerable degree of latitude as to the considered to be a high protein ?our. In the Sponge temperature range used in this step. As previously indi Dough and 40% Flour Ferment procedures, the dough cated, however, if the ?our or dough is subjected to conditioners were mixed with the ingredients during excessive temperatures, there is a risk that the protein the Sponge and Preferment stages of some batches, content thereof will become denatured and the dough respectively, and in the Dough stages of others to com will be incapable of developing the desired characteris pare the effectiveness thereof. The Straight-Dough tics. method was carried out not only using a regular or 35 For example, in a sponge-dough technique, flour, 80-minute fermentation, but also using a “short-time” water, yeast and yeast nutrients are subjected to a two fermentation of 20 minutes. The formulations and pro stage mixing under ambient conditions to form a sponge cedures otherwise used in each case are listed below: which is permitted to ferment for about 3-5 hours and TABLE l-A preferably for about 3% hours at a temperature of in the 40 WHITE PAN BREAD range of about about 80° to 88° F. and preferably at Sponge-Dough about 84° to 86° F. The exact time period for fermenta Formulation tion may vary depending upon the type of chemical or Ingredients Grams yeast leavening agents used and other important factors was; which are known to affect dough rheology, as those Bread Flour 700 skilled in the art will appreciate. Moreover, it has been Chloride Solution (10%) 4 Solution (5 ppm) 0.46 discovered that allium. material functions equally well Instant Yeast, SAF 10 whether mixed with the sponge ingredients or after Water, 420 fermentation of the sponge has been effected, by mixing Dough: with the dough ingredients which usually include flour, 50 Bread Flour 300 granulated sugar, nonfat dry milk, salt, and shortening, Granulated Sugar 60 Nonfat Dry Milk 20 in addition to water. Typically the dough ingredients Salt 2O are mixed with the fermented sponge in a mixing vessel Bread Shortening, Trico 30 in a two-stage procedure to complete the development Water, and Ice 192 of the dough. 55 Total Dough Weight 1,756.46 The fully developed dough is then permitted a rest period prior to being subjected to conventional steps The above formulation of ingredients was used in the employed in the baking industry for forming dough into preparation of each batch of white pan bread for pur products such as bread loaves, rolls, buns or other unit poses of the following comparisons. The only modi?ca con?gurations by dividing, rounding, benching, mold tion to this formulation was the inclusion of BASIC® ing and panning the dough. After the dough has been dehydrated garlic powders, L-cysteine, Reduce 150, formed into the desired unit con?guration, it is permit Protease and Reddi-Sponge ® dough conditioner on a ted to proof for a short period of time during which percent by weight of ?our basis to the sponge or the additional carbon dioxide is generated to raise the dough as indicated in the tables below. dough so that when it is baked it will have obtained its 65 For purposes of these comparisons, a typical Sponge desired volume. Dough technique was used to develop each dough Baking of dough for bread is typically conducted for batch. The speci?c sponge-dough procedure involved about 16 minutes at a temperature of about 450° F. for a mixing the sponge ingredients in an A-200 Hobart 4,643,900 11 12 Mixer with McDuffy mixing bowl for 1 minute at low yeast, with the flour, sugar and salt followed by dispers speed and 1 minute at medium speed preliminary to ing the dry ingredients in water with a wire whisk into fermenting the resultant sponge for about 4 hours at a container. The container was then covered and placed 84°—86° F. in a water bath held at about 82° F. for 2 hours. Afterwards the sponge was mixed with the above 5 The preferment was then mixed with the dough in listed dough ingredients in the preparation of each sam- gredients in a McDuffy bowl using an A-200 Hobart P le batch. For each batch, the ?rst _sta g e of. this_ mixin g Mixer. After develo P ment of_ the dou g h, it_ was P ermit was conducted at a low speed setting for 1 minute to ted to ferment for about 10 minutes at ambient tempera suf?ciently incorporate the ingredients. The second ture before being formed into loaves which were stage of the mixing at a medium speed setting was car- 10 proofed prior to baking in an oven at 450° F. for about ried out to fully develop the dough for the requisite 16 minutes. times tabulated below. The endpoint for mixing was TABLE LC judged subjectively by the extensibility and uniformity w of the dough structure. . HgE.PANrarght Dough BREAD The batches of developed dough were then perrmtted 15 Formulation to ferment for about 10 minutes at about 78°-80° F. lngrediems Grams before being. formed into loaveso prior to being proofed. Flour 1000 and baked in an oven set at 450 F. for about 16 minutes. Granulated sugar 60 Nonfat Dry Milk 20 20 Salt ' 20 TABLE l'B Bread Shortening, Trico 30 WHITE PAN BREAD Instant Yeast, SAF 15 40% Flour Ferment water _____631 Formulation Total Dough Weight 1776 Ingredients Grams l’glieii; 25 The above formulation. was used to prepare each Brcad F10“ 600 batch of bread for purposes of these comparisons except granula‘ed Sugar 15 that BASIC ® dehydrated garlic powders, L-cysteine, Ammonuimalt Chloride Solution (10%) 67.5 Requce 150’ PrPtease and Reddl'sponge_ ® d9ugh con‘ Potassium Bromate Solution (5 ppm) 0.69 30 dltioner were included on a percent by weight flour Imam Yeastv SAF 20 basis in the dough as indicated in the following tables. gg?r 750 A conventional straight-dough process was used to -—L“'p develo P e each dou g h batch. This involved mixin g all Breadreferment Flour 923600 the ingredlents. . with. an A-200 Hobart Mixer. 1n. a Granulated Sugar 60 35 McDuffy mixing bowl at medium speed for four to 4.5 Nonfat Dry Milk 20 minutes SaltBread Shortening, Trim 3015 After mixing- - the dough batches were permitted- to water and ICC 122 ferment for 80 minutes for the regular process or 20 Tom] Dough weigh, 1770 minutes for the “short-time” process at 84°—86° F. be 40 fore being formed into loaves which were proofed and Th f 1 t. 1. t d b d. h baked in an oven at 450° F. for about 16 minutes. t. ef Oman‘: Ito; lsfi 3 :ve ‘gasfuse mt 6pm???- The results of the foregoing tests show the effects so? 0 eai thatcBZSIéea an; ed 0: gurpolies ‘Ii 15 which dehydrated garlic and conventional dough con te.s exlgeg a1 50 P t ® e dyRradg. Sgar 10’ di'cysl; ditioners have on reducing the mixing time required to emgit. e uce ’. iodeiise an e ‘'t gouge. 211g f 45 fully develope dough in standard bread making proce flon lbloriert “(tire mcfu e '3“ atgergen by We‘? tod dures. Table l-D lists these results for bread made in . O3: o h‘? rare ermenb (1” _e oug as 1“ ma 6 accordance with three different procedures using m e 3’ es W 16 appear 8 0W‘ . Sunny Kansas Flour and Table l-E, using Seal of Min The dough batches were prepared by ?rst making the preferment. ThlS. involved. dry-blending. the instant. nesota Flour. TABLE l-D Flour Type: SUNNY KANSAS Bread-makint7 Procedure Sponge-Dough 40% Flour Ferment Straight Dough Dough Level Added to: Added to: 80’ 20' Conditioner % Sponge Dough Preferrn. Dough Reg. Short Time Control — 3 3 3 3 4.5 4 Basic 600-0 0.01 2.75 2 2.5 2.5 3.75 3 0.1 1.5 1.5 2.25 2.25 3.25 3 0.25 1 1.25 2 2 3.25 3.5 Basic 602 0.05 2.5 2 2.5 2.75 3.75 3.25 0.1 1.5 1.5 2.75 2.25 3.5 3 0.25 1.25 1.75 2.5 2.5 3.5 2.75 Reddi-Sponge 1.0 2 1.5 2.5 2.5 3 2.5 1.5 1 1 2 2 2.25 2 L-Cysteine 30 ppm 2 1.5 2.5 2.25 3 2.5 45 ppm 1.5 1 2.25 2.25 2.25 2 Reduce 150 0.5 2 2 2.5 2.5 3 2.25 0.75 1 1.25 2 2 2.25 2 Protase 0.125 2.5 2 2.5 2.75 3.5 3.25 0.25 1.5 1.5 2.25 2.25 3.25 3 4,643,900 13 14 TABLE l-D-continued Flour Tyne: SUNNY KANSAS Bread-making Procedure Sponge-Dough 40% Flour Ferment Straight Dough Dough Level Added to: Added to: 80’ 20' Conditioner % Sponge Dough Preferm. Dough Reg. Short Time 0.5 1 1.5 2.25 2.25 3.25 2.75

TABLE l-E Flour Type: SEAL OF MINNESOTA Bread-making Procedure Sponge-Dough 40% Flour Ferment Straight Dough Dough Level Added to: Added to: 80' 20' Conditioner % Sponge Dough Prefenn. Dough Reg. Short Time Control - 3 3 4 4.25 4.75 4 Basic 600-0 001 2 2 3.25 3.5 3.75 3.25 0.1 2 1.75 3 3 3.5 3 0.25 1.75 1.75 2.75 3 3.25 2.75 Basic 602 0.05 2.5 2 3.5 3.5 3.75 3.5 0.1 2 1.75 3.25 3.75 3.75 3.25 0.25 1.75 1.5 3 3.5 3.5 2.75 Reddi-Sponge 1.0 1.75 1.75 3 3.25 3.25 3 1.5 1.25 1.5 2.5 2.75 3 2.5 L-Cysteine 30 ppm 1.75 1.75 3 3 3.5 3 45 ppm 1.5 1.5 2.75 2.5 3 2.5 Reduce 150 0.5 2 2 3.25 3.5 3.25 3 0.75 1.25 1.5 2.5 3 3.25 2.25 Protase 0.125 2.25 2 3.5 3.5 3.75 3.25 0.25 1.75 1.75 3.75 3 3.5 3 0.5 1.5 1.5 3 3.25 3.25 3.75

From the tabulated tests results it can be seen that all dough conditioners including dehydrated garlic pow- TABLE 2 t. d ders (BASIC 600 and BASIC 602) were similarly effec- '°°“ "we tive in reducing the mix-time required for complete 35 PIZZA FORMULA dough development. It does not appear that the func- _ Fmnmam“ tional effect of dehydrated garlic as a dough conditioner lngred‘ems Grams is substantially affected by the type of ?our used, i.e. Motwcalcmm ’ Anhydrous 1’ high protein or typical bread ?our, or at what stage of gzgi‘t'giigliizwurpose) 583 processing it is mixed with other ingredients, ie in the 40 Compressed Yeast 30 _ dough or otherwise. In general the overall quality of the Water 600 bread made using dehydrated garlic as a dough condi- Total Dough Weight 1768.3 tioner was judged to be substantially the same as bread made usmg conventlonal dough commoners‘ After mixing, the dough batches were fermented for EXAMPLE 11 45 over 40 minutes at 86° F. and then taken to a divider for Pizza shells or crusts were produced using a no-time portioning. Subsequently the dough portions were straight dough process'which used 3 grams of sodium baked in an oven at 430° F. until lightly brown on top. sulfite per 1000 grams of ?our to achieve the desired In comparison, the dough made with dehydrated gluten mellowing with a total mix time of 1 minute at garlic performed as well as the batch made with sodium low speed and 3 minutes at high speed in an A-200 sul?te during processing. The baked crusts were judged Hobart mixer with a McDuffy bowl and fork. Two to be exceptionally uniform in size and shape, having batches of pizza dough containing 1000 grams of flour experienced no objectional shrinkage. each were prepared in an otherwise identical manner EXAMPLE III except that “SUNSPICED” TM dehydrated garlic powder at 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2% by weight of Batches of dough were produced using a commercial ?our, respectively, was substituted for the 0.03% of cracker formulation containing 10,000 grams flour, 0.8 sodium sul?te in the following formulation: grams bacterial protease, with the remainder compris ing standard ingredients used in the cracker industry. TABLE 2 TABLE 3 PIZZA FORMULA Formulation Dough Improver Batch No. Use Level Ingredients Grams Sodium sulfite l 1.6 grams SUNSPICED TM 2 0.05% (f.b.) Bread Flour 1000 Garlic Powder Salt 25 SUNSPICED TM 3 0.01% (f.b.) Sweet Dairy Whey l5 65 Garlic Powder Granulated Sucrose 30 Conventional 4 0.01% (f.b.) Calcium Propionate 5 Garlic Powder Baking Soda 5 Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate 28 6 4,643,900 15 16 In the preparation of batch no. 1, 1.6 grams of sodium TABLE 2-continued sulfite was used. For batch nos. 2 and 3, SUN English Muffins SPICED TM dehydrated garlic at levels of 0.05% and Formulation 0.01%, respectively, were used in lieu of the sodium Lbs. sul?te of batch no. 1 in an otherwise standard and iden Ingredients Control Invention tical commercial cracker formulation. In batch no. 4, 0.01% of conventional dehydrated garlic was substi Shortening 3.2 3.2 tuted for the sodium sul?te. Each dough batch was mixed for about 11 minutes at The ingredients listed above were ?rst mixed slowly low speed in a horizontal mixer equipped with a blend for 1 minute to evenly distribute the dry materials in the ing arm agitator, after which they were permitted to water followed by high-speed mixing for 8 minutes, rest for about 30 minutes before being passed to the prior to adding 5.5 lbs of salt, 1.5 lbs of Mycoban and 28 make-up line for laminating, sheeting, cutting and bak and 30 lbs of water, respectively, to the control batch mg. and dough batch containing garlic powder. The dough The dough of batch no. 1 was slightly sticky immedi batches were then mixed slowly for 1 minute before ately after mixing. After a 30 minute rest period, it was mixing for 3 minutes at high speed. Afterwards the judged to exhibit normal qualities being very short and doughs were permitted to ferment at 80°—85° F. and slightly sticky. Overall processing of the dough was griddled until done. The English muf?ns made in accor judged to be very good. dance with the present invention were judged to be As to batch no. 2, the dough appeared to be very 20 generally superior to muf?ns of the control in that they similar to that of batch no. 1, although somewhat drier. resulted with a very uniform porosity. Moreover during The overall sheeting properties, however, were judged processing the dough exhibited improved machinabil to be acceptable. ity, and a more uniform cup ?ow. With respect to batch no. 3, the dough was judged to be short and slightly dry immediately after mixing, but 25 EXAMPLE ‘v exhibited a slightly moist feel after a 30-minute rest Hot dog buns were made using a standard sponge period. At the laminator and sheeter, the dough was dough method using the following formulations: judged to be only slightly dry. TABLE 5 The dough of batch no. 4 had a slightly short consis tency and a moderately wet feel which became slightly 30 Hot Dog Buns 11% more pronounced after a 30-minute rest period. In com Lbs. parison with the dough of batch no. 1, this dough batch Ingredients Control Invention was judged to be slightly dry and short in texture but handled equally as well during laminating, sheeting and MEL 35 Flour 80 80 stamping. Water 45 45 The foregoing observations indicate that cracker Soy Oil 6 6 doughs formulated to contain dehydrated garlic absorb Yeast Food .5 .5 more water during development than standard doughs SSL .5 .5 including sodium bisul?te. This was manifested by their Yeast 2.5 2.5 40 Monomul-D .5 .5 slightly dryer texture. Increased absorption is an advan Protease .5 .5 tage in that this phenomenon results with an increase in @2114. yield. In other respects, the organoleptic characteristics Basic 602 — 0.125 of the crackers made from dough including dehydrated Flour 2O 20 garlic were judged to be as good as those for batch no. Water l0 l1 45 Salt 2.25 2.25 1. None, however, were observed as having the linger Yeast l 1 ing sul?te aftertaste often apparent in crackers made Liquid Sugar l8 l8 with sodium sul?te. Vital Wheat Gluten 2.5 2.5 Bromitab .125 .125 EXAMPLE IV Calif. Tab .0625 .0625 English muf?ns were prepared by a straight dough 50 process using the following standard formulation except During processing, the dough containing dehydrated that 1.25 lbs. of BASIC 602 dehydrated garlic was sub garlic was observed to be easily machined and exhibited stituted for 1.6 lbs of sultite-containing dough condi a uniform quality from batch to batch. Moreover, it tioner used in the control batch. required 2 minutes less mixing to be considered suffi 55 TABLE 2 ciently developed for processing. The overall quality of the baked buns was judged to be at least as good as the English Muffins Formulation buns made from the control dough batch. Lbs. EXAMPLE VI Ingredients Control Invention Croissants have also been made from dough including BASIC 602 — 1.25 Dough Conditioner'sul?te containing 1.6 — dehydrated garlic in an otherwise standard formulation Flour 315 315 as listed below: Water 245 255 Sugar 9.5 9.5 TABLE 6 NFDM 3.2 3.2 65 Croissants Yeast Food 1.6 1.6 2% Vinegar 3.2 3.2 Ingredients Lbs. Protease 3.2 — Yeast 1.8 1.8 Flour 400 4,643,900 17 18 TABLE 6-continued TABLE 7-A-continued croissants Formulation m INGREDIENTS GRAMS Ingredients Lbs. 5 Bread Flour 700 Water 200 Mineral Yeast 5 Non-fat Milk powder 30 Food Yeast 32 Compressed Yeast 20 Butter 40 Water 420 Salt 6 Dough: Dehydrated Garlic (BASIC 604) 10 Bread Flour 300 O-5 Granulated Sugar 40 Non-fat Dry Milk 40 The above ingredients. . were mixed. for 2 m1nutes. at a BreadSalt Shortening 3020 low speed setting to incorporate the dry materials with Water and Ice 221 the water followed by 2 minutes of high-speed mixing 15 Total Dough 1,796 to form a dough into which 110 lbs of butter was folded. Welgh‘ The resultant dough was retarded at 38°—45° F. in a cooler for 12 hours prior to make-up and sheeting. Each dough batch was prepared using a standard 3% During processing, it was observed that the the hour sponge-dough method. The results are tabulated dough was ready for make-up and sheeting 4 hours 20 below:

TABLE 7-B Use _DQL__ Bread Level Water Mixing Proof Speci?c Quality Dough Batch (f.b.) Absorpt. Time Height Time Volume Score Improver No. % % Minutes mm Minutes cc/grams Total C_°1"L°|=_ None 1 64.1 4 100.7 56 5.38 845 Flavorless Garlic Powder: None 2 0.01 64.0 3% 102.7 57 5.26 84% None _ 3 0.05 64.3 35 100.3 56 5.28 821 None 4 0.10 64.3 3% 99.3 53 5.27 805 None 5 0.15 64.6 31 100.0 56 5.33 76% Flavorless Garlic Powder: None 6 0.01 64.0 3% 100.0 54 5.34 83% None 7 0.05 64.3 3% 100.3 55 5.25 83:} None 8 0.10 64.6 3 99.7 55 5.23 77% None 9 0.15 64.6 3 101.0 58 5.31 79% Composition - 20% Flavorless Dehydrated Garlic/80% Unmodi?ed Wheat Starch: None 10 0.05 64.0 at 99.0 54 5.25 845 None 11 0.25 64.6 3% 101.3 59 5.37 81 None 12 0.50 65.0 3% 101.3 55 5.32 79% None 13 1.00 65.2 3.} 101.0 58 5.23 75%

As shown by this data, the mixing time at medium quicker than doughs made from the same formulation 50 speed for the dough batches to which the dough condi but without garlic. Moreover, the dough was judged to tioner was added was reduced by at least 15 seconds to be easier to make-up because it was more relaxed. as much as a 1 minute, compared to the control. The resultant bread doughs were judged to exhibit very EXAMPLE VII good handling properties. The doughs proofed to the This test is a comparison of a dough conditioner com 55 desired height of 101 :2 mm within 56:3 minutes and position comprising garlic and an inert material versus were judged to have a good volume, and equivalent dehydrated garlic used alone as a dough conditioner. quality upon baking. Overall, the dehydrated garlic The following formulation was used as the basis for used alone functioned equivalently to its use in composi each batch of bread for purposes of this comparison. tion. This formulation was modi?ed, however, by the inclu 60 sion of speci?ed amounts of dough conditioner on a EXAMPLE VIII percent by weight of ?our basis as indicated in the tabu The following rheological evaluations were made to lated results. compare the relative effectiveness of conventional TABLE 7-A dough additives and the dough conditioners of the pres 65 Formulation ent invention. The methodology used to obtain the data was the AACC method 54-21. The INGREDIENTS GRAMS dough properties were also evaluated with a Brabender Sponge: Extensigraph using the AACC Method 54-10. 4,643,900 19 20 TABLE 8-A w Use Level Time Dough (f.b.) Absorpt. Arrival Peak Depart. Stability M.T.1. lmprover % % Min. Min. Min. Min. B.U. Control: — 56.1 1.0 13.5 38.0 37.0 10 Basic 801 0.1 56.2 1.0 14.0 36.0 35.0 5 0.25 57.8 2.0 9.0 15.0 13.0 40 0.5 58.2 5.0 8.0 11.0 6.0 80 1.0 58.4 4.5 7.0 9.5 5.0 80 Basic 6000 0.01 56.2 1.0 14.5 39.0 38.0 5 0.25 57.2 2.0 10.0 22.0 20.0 20 0.5 57.6 2.0 10.5 17.5 15.5 30 1.0 57.7 3.0 10.0 14.5 11.5 50 Basic 602 0.01 56.2 1.0 13.0 34.0 33.0 5 .05 56.5 1.0 11.0 33.5 32.5 5 .25 56.8 1.0 10.5 26.0 25.0 10 .5 56.8 1.0 10.5 24.5 23.5 10 Reddi-Sponge 1.0 57.4 1.0 6.0 25.0 24.0 20 1.5 58.0 1.5 5.5 16.0 14.5 20 3.0 59.3 2.0 5.0 9.0 7.0 40 -Cysteine 20 ppm 56.3 1.0 5.5 27.5 26.5 20 30 ppm 56.6 1.0 4.5 21.5 20.5 .20 45 ppm 56.7 1.5 4.5 14.0 12.5 30 90 ppm 58.2 1.5 4.5 9.0 7.5 60 Sodium Bisulfate 100 58.7 1.5 3.0 5.0 3.5 60 ppm Reduce 150 0.5 57.3 1.0 4.5 22.0 21.0 20 0.75 58.3 1.5 4.5 13.5 12.0 30 1.0 59.0 2.0 4.5 11.5 7.0 40 Protase 0.125 56.1 1.0 12.0 36.0 35.0 5 0.25 55.5 1.0 8.0 26.0 25.0 10 0.5 55.0 1.0 5.5 28.5 27.5 20

The foregoing data indicates that dehydrated garlic maximum viscosity of the dough. Moreover, increased dough conditioners exhibit a reducing effect on the absorption was also observed at increasing use levels of mix-time of wheat dough systems when compared to dehydrated garlic. In general, the performance of the the control. This is illustrated by decreased peak times different dough conditioners was similar. TABLE 8-B EXTENSIGRAPH DATA Use Level Dough (f.b.) Resistance to Extension (BU) Extensibility (cm) lmprover % 45 min. 90 min. 135 min. 45 min. 90 min. 135 min. Control — 545 790 895 18.0 12.1 13.0 Basic 801 0.01 545 765 865 19.8 13.0 11.3 0.25 360 580 620 18.5 12.1 11.2 0.5 130 240 325 23.8 22.5 16.9 1.0 95 170 210 23.2 20.8 20.7 Basic 600-0 0.01 540 690 875 17.7 12.4 10.7 0.25 450 670 700 20.0 15.4 13.2 0.5 310 485 540 21.0 16.0 13.6 1.0 310 460 520 20.5 16.0 14.8 Basic 602 0.01 570 825 890 18.4 13.4 10.7 0.05 580 740 855 19.7 14.1 12.8 0.25 535 730 550 20.0 16.8 14.6 0.5 490 650 705 19.2 15.5 14.3 1.0 480 600 660 19.3 14.9 13.6 Reddi Sponge L0 330 480 400 21.0 19.4 17.7 1.5 250 365 430 22.8 21.5 19.3 3.0 150 310 530 24.6 19.7 12.4 L-Cysteine 20 ppm 310 410 400 22.5 20.1 20.0 30 ppm 290 355 320 21.5 20.7 20.5 45 ppm 225 240 250 24.8 24.4 23.1 90 ppm 100 110 145 23.4 25.4 23.5 Sodium Bisul?te 100 ppm 35 50 70 23.2 20.6 17.8 Reduce 150 0.5 265 300 315 23.5 21.6 22.3 0.75 150 215 250 27.2 24.6 23.5 1.0 100 135 165 19.0 22.6 23.3 Protase 0.125 585 710 835 18.4 15.3 13.1 0.25 515 655 710 19.8 17.0 17.7 0.5 560 540 600 18.5 18.0 19.0 and stabilities particularly at use-levels of garlic by 65 weight of flour on the order of 0.25% and higher. The lower peak times correlate to reduced mix-times in that The Extensigraph data indicates that the resistance to these ?gures represent the time required to develop extension of all doughs decreased with increasing levels 4,643,900 21 22 of the dough conditioners. Related to this, the extensi 5. The method of claim 4 wherein said effective bility of all doughs were improved by the use of dough amount is an amount up to about 0.3% by weight of said conditioners at all levels evaluated. flour. From the foregoing description, one skilled in the art 6. The method of claim 5 wherein said effective can easily ascertain the essential characteristics of this amount is between about 0.01 to 0.3% by weight of said invention and, without departing from the spirit and ?our. scope thereof, can make various changes and modifica 7. The method of claim 6 wherein said effective tions of the invention to adapt it to various usages and amount is between about 0.01 to 0.05% by weight of conditions. said ?our. What is claimed is: 8. The method of claim 6 wherein said effective 1. The method for making dough products compris amount is between about 0.05 to 0.25% by weight of mg: said flour. providing a dough formulation comprising substan 9. The method of claim 1 wherein said time suf?cient tially flavorless dehydrated garlic in an effective to develop a dough is less than the time required to amount to function as a dough conditioner, ?our, develop a dough which does not contain said substan leavening agent, and water; and tially flavorless dehydrated garlic. mixing said formulation for a time suf?cient to de 10. The method of claim 1 wherein said mixing to velop a dough. ' develop a dough is performed as a step of a process 2. The method of claim 1 wherein substantially ?a selected from the group consisting of a sponge-dough vorless dehydrated garlic is in a form selected from the process, a straight-dough process and a brew process. group consisting of granules, powder and agglomerates. 11. The method of claim 1 further comprising heating 3. The method of claim 1 wherein said effective said dough in an oven to produce a baked product. amount is an amount up to about 1.0% by weight of said 12. The method of claim 11 wherein said baked prod flour. uct is selected from the group consisting of bread 4. The method of claim 3 wherein said garlic is incor 25 loaves, rolls, buns, crackers, biscuits, muf?ns, pizza, porated into the formulation in an amount up to about sweet goods, pastry, croissants, tortillas, and pretzels. 0.5% by weight of said ?our. * * * * t

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65 UNITED sTATEs PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION PATENT N0. 4,643,900 DATED February 17, 1987 INVENTOHS) : Roy W. Porter It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby corrected as shown below:

In the Abstract, line 15, "products" should read -- product ——.

Column 1, line 40, after "dough" insert —— . ——. Column 1, line 45, "exhibits" should read —- exhibit ——. Column line 8, "suplemental" should read —— supplement ——. Column line 61, after "some" delete "a". Column line 4, delete "above". Column 17, line 10 of Table 6, place —— 0.5 -—, for Dehydrated Garlic... under the "6 (Lbs.)" same table line 11, delete "0.5". Column 19, line 20 (Table 8-A) "—cystene" should read -— L-cystene ——. Column 19, line 24 (Table 8-A) "Sodium Bisulfate" should read —- Sodium Bisulfite ——.

Signed and Sealed this Twenty-fifth Day of October, 1988

Arrest:

DONALD J. QUIGG

Arresring O?icer Commissioner of Parents and Trademarks