Part a Tutorial Prof. Saifur Rahman Virginia Tech, USA PES ISGT Asia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Part a Tutorial Prof. Saifur Rahman Virginia Tech, USA PES ISGT Asia Part A Tutorial PES ISGT Asia Prof. Saifur Rahman 20 May 2014 Virginia Tech, USA Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 1 Part 1: Operational Issues for Wind Energy Technology • Wind turbine technology • Global deployment of wind energy technology • Interactions between wind electricity output and electrical power demand Part 2: Operational Issues for Solar Energy Technology • Solar energy technologies – solar thermal and photovoltaics • Global deployment of solar energy technology • Interactions between solar electricity output and electrical power demand 2 (c) Saifur Rahman Part 3: Demand Response Technologies • Demand response and demand side management (DSM) • Demand response technologies – supply side and demand side • Performance of demand response technologies Part 4: Demand Response Planning and Operations • Sample demand response programs in operation • Customer incentives and participation • Impact of demand response on the electrical load shape 3 (c) Saifur Rahman Source: International Energy Agency (IEA) 2007, 2010 and 2013 Key World Energy Statistics ** Others include solar, wind, geothermal, biofuels and waste, and heat 5/21/2014 4 ©Saifur Rahman WORLD 1971-2011* OECD 1971-2012* (Mtoe) (Mtoe) Biomass and Wast Hydro Nuclear Natural Gas Oil Coal/Peat * Includes aviation and international marine bunkers * Includes aviation and international marine bunkers, excludes electricity trade Source: International Energy Agency (IEA) Key World Energy Statistics 2013 5/21/2014 5 ©Saifur Rahman 2014 6 (c) Saifur Rahman Wind Solar Biomass Geothermal Hydro Tidal Power Unique features & variability 7 (c) Saifur Rahman Wind Energy Off-shore Wind turbines, Blyth, U.K. 8 (c) Saifur Rahman Global Installed Wind Capacity (MW) 1996-2013 (Cumulative) Source: Global Wind Energy Council, Global Wind Statistics (2013) (c) Saifur Rahman © Saifur Rahman 2014 Future Wind Power Capacity (MW) 1997-2020 World Wind Energy Association, World Wind Energy Report 2012 (c) Saifur Rahman © Saifur Rahman 2014 Top 10 Countries (Installed Wind Capacity) December 2010 Rest of the World Denmark China Canada UK France Italy India USA Spain Germany Source: Global Wind Energy Council (2011) (c) Saifur Rahman © Saifur Rahman 2014 Top 10 Countries (Installed Wind Capacity) by December 2013 Source: Global Wind Energy Council, Global Wind Statistics (2013) (c) Saifur Rahman © Saifur Rahman 2014 Annual Installed Wind Capacity by Region (MW) (2005-2013) Source: Global Wind Energy Council, Global Wind Statistics (2013) (c) Saifur Rahman © Saifur Rahman 2014 Wildorado Wind Ranch-Siemens LOCATION: Wildorado, TX 25 miles west of Amarillo in Oldham, Potter and Randall Counties SIZE: 161 MW COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS DATE: April 2007 UTILITY: Xcel Energy (Southwestern Public Service Company) TURBINE EQUIPMENT: Source: http://www.nikkiphotography.com/category/environmental-issues/ 70 Siemens 2.3 MW Mk II http://www.cielowind.com/projects/completed-developments/wildorado-wind-ranc (c) Saifur Rahman © Saifur Rahman 2014 Nysted Wind Farm-Siemens Nysted Wind Farm Located in the Baltic Sea, it is one of the world’s largest wind farms. Owner: DONG Energy, Denmark (80%) and E.ON Sweden (20%). Layout: The wind farm is made up of 8 rows of 9 turbines, of which the nearest are placed some ten kilometers offshore. Turbine: each can generate 2.3 MW. The combined effect is Source: http://www.dongenergy.com/Nysted/EN/Pages/index.aspx 165.6 MW. Commercially handed over: Dec. 1st, 2004 (c) Saifur Rahman © Saifur Rahman 2014 Wind Power Issues Opportunities: Generate electricity to replace fossil fuel and serve remote area loads. Challenges: In-country technology base Available manpower Power system operatioin issues due to high penetration of wind turbines Transmission line upgrades Source: IISD Report, Clean Energy Investment in Developing Countries, Wind power in Egypt, October 2009 (c) Saifur Rahman © Saifur Rahman 2014 Wind Turbine Equipment Tower: Tubular steel Height: 263 feet (80 meters) Weight: 100-150 tons Blades: Length: 112 ft (34 m) Weight: 20 tons (for all three). Rotor Diameter: 231 ft (70.5 meters) (about 10% longer than the wingspan of a jumbo jet) Swept Area: 41,995 sq. feet per turbine Colorado Green 162 MW Wind Project Source: PPM Energy 17 (c) Saifur Rahman Wind Turbine Nacelle & Hub (c)Source: Saifur General Rahman Electric 18 Inside the GE 1.5MW Nacelle 19 (c)Source: Saifur General Rahman Electric Wind Power ‐ Classification Source: Z. Aljarboua, “The National Energy Strategy for S. Arabia”, 2009 20 (c) Saifur Rahman 20 Wind Output & Load Mismatch (PJM) (A peak day in June, 06/08/2011) 160,000 2,500 150,000 2,300 140,000 2,100 130,000 1,900 (MW) 120,000 1,700 Output (MW) 110,000 1,500 Load Power 100,000 1,300 PJM Wind 90,000 1,100 PJM 80,000 900 70,000 PJM Load ‐ a Peak Day in June 2011 700 Wind Power Output 60,000 500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (Hour) Data source: http://www.pjm.com/markets-and-operations/ops-analysis.aspx 21 (c) Saifur Rahman Wind Output & Load Mismatch (PJM) (A peak day in July, 07/22/2011) 160,000 1,800 150,000 1,600 140,000 1,400 130,000 (MW) 1,200 120,000 1,000 Output (MW) 110,000 Load 800 Power 100,000 PJM Wind 600 90,000 PJM 400 80,000 PJM Load ‐ a Peak Day in July 2011 70,000 200 Wind Power Output 60,000 ‐ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (Hour) Data source: http://www.pjm.com/markets-and-operations/ops-analysis.aspx 22 (c) Saifur Rahman ERCOT (Texas) Load vs Actual Wind Output (10/11/2011 ‐ 10/18/2011) Data source: http://www.ercot.com/gridinfo/generation/windintegration/ 23 (c) Saifur Rahman ERCOT (Texas) Load vs Actual Wind Output (08/17/2011 ‐ 08/24/2011) Data source: http://www.ercot.com/gridinfo/generation/windintegration/ 24 (c) Saifur Rahman Minute‐by‐minute Variations in a Wind Farm Wind output drops 43.7 MW in 1 minute Source: NREL 25 (c) Saifur Rahman 10‐MinuteVariations in a Wind Farm Wind output can drop 113 MW in 10 minutes, and increase 106 MW in 10 minutes Source: NREL 26 (c) Saifur Rahman Solar Energy Solar Photovoltaics (PV) Solar Thermal (CSP) 27 (c) Saifur Rahman Solar Photovoltaics Central Station Solar Photovoltaics © Saifur Rahman Roof-top Solar Photovoltaics © Saifur Rahman 5/21/2014 (c) Saifur Rahman 28 2012 Global Cumulative Installed PV Capacity (MW) Source: EPIA Global Market Outlook for PV 2013-2017 5/21/2014 (c) Saifur Rahman 29 Solar PV Applications Grid connected central station Roof-top applications Building Integrated PV (BIPV) Remote area applications 30 (c) Saifur Rahman 600 kW Grid‐connected Project in Thailand © Saifur Rahman 31 (c) Saifur Rahman 100 kW Grid‐connected Project in China © Saifur Rahman 32 (c) Saifur Rahman 10 MW Solar PV at Masdar, Abu Dhabi Source: www.ameinfo.com 33 (c) Saifur Rahman 2 MW Solar PV at KAUST, S. Arabia Source: KAUST 34 (c) Saifur Rahman LehrterTrain Station, Germany Number of module: 1,440 Total area: 3,311 m2 PV output: 325 kW Electricity generation: 274,000 kWh/yr Source: http://www.cler.org/predac/article.php3?id_article=511 35 (c) Saifur Rahman Building Integrated PV in Thailand Source: Solartron, Thailand 36 (c) Saifur Rahman Roof‐top Solar PV in Virginia, USA © Saifur Rahman 37 (c) Saifur Rahman Roof‐top Solar Photovoltaics in Bangladesh © Saifur Rahman 38 (c) Saifur Rahman Roof‐top Solar Photovoltaics in Japan Source: Energybiz Magazine 39 (c) Saifur Rahman 40 (c) Saifur Rahman Balance of System © Saifur Rahman 41 (c) Saifur Rahman Transformer/Switchgear © Saifur Rahman © Saifur Rahman 42 (c) Saifur Rahman Grid Interconnection © Saifur Rahman 43 (c) Saifur Rahman Concentrator PV Technology Concept: Provides the highest energy output and lowest cost of any solar technology available Source: SolFocus Inc. 44 (c) Saifur Rahman 7‐Day Solar PV Output (Watts) Location: Manhattan, Kansas 500 400 (Watts) 300 Output 200 PV Solar 100 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 45 (c) Saifur Rahman A 24‐hour Solar PV Output (kW) Location: Manhattan, Kansas Month: April 80% drop and increase in kW output in 5 minutes 46 (c) Saifur Rahman A 24‐hour Solar PV Output (kW) Location: Blacksburg, Virginia Month: September 95% increase in kW output in 10 minutes 47 (c) Saifur Rahman Solar Thermal Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) Source: Solarclipse 48 (c) Saifur Rahman Central Receiver Solar Power Plants 15 MWe Molten Salt Solar Thermal Power Plant, Almeria, Spain, 2008 Source: Platforma De Almeria, Annual Report 2007 49 (c) Saifur Rahman Central Receiver Solar Power Plants 11 MW PS-10 and 20 MW PS-20 Solar Tower Plant, Seville, Spain Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_in_Spain 50 (c) Saifur Rahman 5MW Sierra SunTower CSP Plant, CA, USA Source: http://www.esolar.com/l (c) Saifur Rahman 51 5 MW Sierra SunTower Project CA, USA Source: http://www.esolar.com/l (c) Saifur Rahman 52 Solar Thermal Project Mojave Desert, USA The Mojave Desert has nine solar power plants in operation with a capacity of 354 MW. Project: Mojave solar park (6000 acres) Location: California, U.S.A. Capacity: 553 MW (for 400,000 homes) No of mirrors: 1.2 million In service: 2012 Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20068703/ 53 (c) Saifur Rahman Details of Solar Heat Collection Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20068703/ 54 (c) Saifur Rahman Point Focus Solar Collectors DISTAL I, Dish/Stirling Engine System, Almeria, Spain Source: Platforma De Almeria, Annual Report 2007 (c) Saifur Rahman 55 Point Focus Solar Collectors DISTAL II, Dish/Stirling Engine System, Almeria, Spain Source: Platforma De Almeria, Annual Report 2007 56 (c) Saifur Rahman CSP Project in Spain 57 (c) Saifur Rahman CSP Technology 58 (c) Saifur Rahman Biomass Technologies BAGASSE MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL CELLULOSE SWITCH GRASS 5/21/2014 (c) Saifur Rahman 59 Biogas from Bagasse A bagasse-powered co-generation power plant at Porto Feliz in Brazil owned and operated by LANXESS, a chemical industrial plant producing iron-oxide pigments used for dying.
Recommended publications
  • Fire Fighter Safety and Emergency Response for Solar Power Systems
    Fire Fighter Safety and Emergency Response for Solar Power Systems Final Report A DHS/Assistance to Firefighter Grants (AFG) Funded Study Prepared by: Casey C. Grant, P.E. Fire Protection Research Foundation The Fire Protection Research Foundation One Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA, USA 02169-7471 Email: [email protected] http://www.nfpa.org/foundation © Copyright Fire Protection Research Foundation May 2010 Revised: October, 2013 (This page left intentionally blank) FOREWORD Today's emergency responders face unexpected challenges as new uses of alternative energy increase. These renewable power sources save on the use of conventional fuels such as petroleum and other fossil fuels, but they also introduce unfamiliar hazards that require new fire fighting strategies and procedures. Among these alternative energy uses are buildings equipped with solar power systems, which can present a variety of significant hazards should a fire occur. This study focuses on structural fire fighting in buildings and structures involving solar power systems utilizing solar panels that generate thermal and/or electrical energy, with a particular focus on solar photovoltaic panels used for electric power generation. The safety of fire fighters and other emergency first responder personnel depends on understanding and properly handling these hazards through adequate training and preparation. The goal of this project has been to assemble and widely disseminate core principle and best practice information for fire fighters, fire ground incident commanders, and other emergency first responders to assist in their decision making process at emergencies involving solar power systems on buildings. Methods used include collecting information and data from a wide range of credible sources, along with a one-day workshop of applicable subject matter experts that have provided their review and evaluation on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives
    Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 1 2 Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California: Quality Careers—Cleaner Lives Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 3 About the Author Peter Philips (B.A. Pomona College, M.A., Ph.D. Stanford University) is a Professor of Economics and former Chair of the Economics Department at the University of Utah. Philips is a leading economic expert on the U.S. construction labor market. He has published widely on the topic and has testified as an expert in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, served as an expert for the U.S. Justice Department in litigation concerning the Davis-Bacon Act (the federal prevailing wage law), and presented testimony to state legislative committees in Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah, Kentucky, Connecticut, and California regarding the regulations of construction labor markets.
    [Show full text]
  • CSPV Solar Cells and Modules from China
    Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules from China Investigation Nos. 701-TA-481 and 731-TA-1190 (Preliminary) Publication 4295 December 2011 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Deanna Tanner Okun, Chairman Irving A. Williamson, Vice Chairman Charlotte R. Lane Daniel R. Pearson Shara L. Aranoff Dean A. Pinkert Robert B. Koopman Acting Director of Operations Staff assigned Christopher Cassise, Senior Investigator Andrew David, Industry Analyst Nannette Christ, Economist Samantha Warrington, Economist Charles Yost, Accountant Gracemary Roth-Roffy, Attorney Lemuel Shields, Statistician Jim McClure, Supervisory Investigator Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules from China Investigation Nos. 701-TA-481 and 731-TA-1190 (Preliminary) Publication 4295 December 2011 C O N T E N T S Page Determinations.................................................................. 1 Views of the Commission ......................................................... 3 Separate Views of Commission Charlotte R. Lane ...................................... 31 Part I: Introduction ............................................................ I-1 Background .................................................................. I-1 Organization of report.........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report Prepared by Arizona State University NINETY-NINTH ARIZONA TOWN HALL
    Arizona’s Energy Future 99th Arizona Town Hall November 6 - 9, 2011 Background Report Prepared by Arizona State University NINETY-NINTH ARIZONA TOWN HALL PREMIER PARTNER CONTRIBUTING PARTNER COLLABORATING PARTNERS SUPPORTING PARTNERS CIVIC PARTNERS CORE Construction Kennedy Partners Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite Sundt Construction One East Camelback, Suite 530, Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Phone: 602.252.9600 Fax: 602.252.6189 Website: www.aztownhall.org Email: [email protected] ARIZONA’S ENERGY FUTURE September 2011 We thank you for making the commitment to participate in the 99th Arizona Town Hall to be held at the Grand Canyon on November 6-9, 2011. You will be discussing and developing consensus with fellow Arizonans on the future of energy in Arizona. An essential element to the success of these consensus-driven discussions is this background report that is provided to all participants before the Town Hall convenes. As they have so often done for past Arizona Town Halls, Arizona State University has prepared a detailed and informative report that will provide a unique and unparalleled resource for your Town Hall panel sessions. Special thanks go to editors Clark Miller and Sharlissa Moore of the Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes at ASU for spearheading this effort and marshaling many talented professionals to write individual chapters. For sharing their wealth of knowledge and professional talents, our thanks go to the many authors who contributed to the report. Our deepest gratitude also goes to University Vice President and Dean of the College of Public Programs for ASU, Debra Friedman, and Director of the School of Public Affairs for ASU, Jonathan Koppell, who made great efforts to ensure that ASU could provide this type of resource to Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Shining Cities
    Shining Cities Harnessing the Benefits of Solar Energy in America Shining Cities Harnessing the Benefits of Solar Energy in America Written by: Judee Burr and Lindsey Hallock, Frontier Group Rob Sargent, Environment America Research & Policy Center Spring 2015 Acknowledgments Environment America Research & Policy Center sincerely thanks Chad Laurent, Meister Consultants Group, Inc.; Anya Schoolman, Community Power Network; Pierre Bull, Natural Resources Defense Coun- cil; Andrea Luecke, The Solar Foundation; John Farrell, Institute for Local Self Reliance and Riana Ackley, ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability for their review of drafts of this document, as well as their insights and suggestions. Thanks to everyone who went out of their way to provide us with data for this report. Thanks also to Jeff Inglis, Tony Dutzik and Gideon Weissman of Frontier Group for editorial sup- port and to ESRI for their grant of ArcGIS software that we used for our data analysis in this report. Environment America Research & Policy Center thanks The Tilia Fund, The Barr Foundation, The John Merck Fund, The Scherman Foundation, The Arntz Family Fund, The Carolyn Foundation, The Fred and Alice Stanback Foundation, The Meyer Memorial Trust, Fund for New Jersey, The Town Creek Founda- tion, The Rauch Foundation, The McCune Charitable Foundation, Edna Wardlaw Charitable Trust, The Waterfall Fund, The Morris Foundation, The Krieger Fund, The Fund for Change, and The Bancroft Foun- dation for making this report possible. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of Environment America Research & Policy Center. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review.
    [Show full text]
  • SREC) Markets: Status and Trends
    Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) Markets: Status and Trends Lori Bird, Jenny Heeter, and Claire Kreycik NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-52868 November 2011 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) Markets: Status and Trends Lori Bird, Jenny Heeter, and Claire Kreycik Prepared under Task No. SM10.2464 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 1617 Cole Boulevard NREL/TP-6A20-52868 Golden, Colorado 80401 November 2011 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunshot Vision Study February 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    SunShot Vision Study February 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The U.S. Department of Energy would like to acknowledge the project coordination and in-depth analysis conducted by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and the contributions by the Solar Energy Industries Association, Solar Electric Power Association, and the many organizations that participated in the development of this report. The preparation and production of this report was coordinated by New West Technologies, LLC, Energetics Incorporated, and NREL. All contributors to the report are listed in Appendix D. Cover photo renderings by Joshua Bauer, NREL MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR OF THE SUNSHOT INITIATIVE The SunShot Initiative was launched in February 2011 with the goal of making solar energy cost- competitive with conventional electricity generating technologies within the decade. Achieving this goal will require dramatic decreases in the cost structure of solar technologies—on the order of a 75% reduction—across all markets including residential, commercial, and utility-scale deployments of solar. To do this most effectively, the SunShot Initiative spans the full spectrum from basic science to applied research and development. It also spans across multiple U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) offices, including Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy (ARPA-E) and the Office of Science (SC). The SunShot Vision Study explores the implications of achieving the SunShot Initiative’s targets both in terms of potential benefits as well as potential challenges. The potential benefits include solar contributing an increasingly significant share of electricity generation over the next 20 to 40 years, creating thousands of new jobs, and saving consumers money by placing downward pressure on electricity prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Cutting Carbon Emissions Under Section 111(D)
    Cutting Carbon Emissions Under §111(d): 505 9th Street NW | Suite 800 | Washington DC 20004 | 202.682.0556 | www.seia.org Solar Energy Industries Association Celebrating its 40th anniversary in 2014, the Solar Energy Industries Association® is the national trade association of the U.S. solar energy industry. Through advocacy and education, SEIA® is building a strong solar industry to power America. As the voice of the industry, SEIA works with its 1,000 member companies to champion the use of clean, affordable solar in America by expanding markets, removing market barriers, strengthening the industry and educating the public on the benefits of solar energy. For additional information, please visit www.seia.org. Acknowledgments This report benefited from the expertise of SEIA’s EPA 111(d) working group, as well as: Katherine Stainken, Manager, Government Affairs Rick Umoff, Counsel and Regulatory Affairs Manager, State Affairs Carrie Cullen Hitt, Senior Vice President, State Affairs David Wooley, Of Counsel to Keyes, Fox & Wiedman LLP Cover Photos (clockwise from left): Enphase, Brightergy, BrightSource Energy, Skyline Solar This report is intended for informational purposes only. References to specific products and projects have been included solely to advance these purposes and do not constitute an endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation by SEIA. © 2014 Solar Energy Industries Association® SEIA | www.seia.org 1 Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction: Regulating Carbon Emissions Under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act ............................... 4 Why Regulate Carbon Emissions Under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act? ................................................................................................................. 4 The EPA’s Authority to Regulate Carbon Emissions Under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The California ISO Controlled Grid Generation Queue for All: Active
    Report Run Date: 10/06/2021 The California ISO Controlled Grid Generation Queue for All: Active Deliverability Generating Facility Net MWs to Grid Status Location Point of Interconnection Study Availability System Off-Peak Feasibility Facilities Study Interconnection Full Capacity, Station or Proposed Impact Study Interconnection Application Study Deliverability Current Study or (FAS) or Optional Study Project Name Queue Position Request Queue Date Partial or Energy County State Utility Transmission On-line Date or Agreement Status Process and Economic On-line Date Supplemental Phase II Cluster (OS) MW-1 MW-2 Only (FC/P/EO) Fuel-1 Fuel-2 Receive Date Type-1 Type-2 Line (as filed with IR) Phase I Status Only Review Study MW Total Cluster Study TULE WIND 32 5/12/2004 5/24/2004 ACTIVE Serial LGIP Wind Turbine Wind 193.80 193.80 Partial Capacity Off-Peak SAN DIEGO CA SDGE Boulevard East 9/1/2007 12/31/2022 Waived Complete Complete None Executed Turbin Deliverability Substation 138kV e LAKE ELSINORE ADVANCED 72 4/26/2005 6/21/2005 ACTIVE Serial LGIP Storage Pump 500 500 Full Capacity Off-Peak RIVERSIDE CA SDGE Proposed Lee 12/31/2008 12/31/2028 Waived Complete Re-Study None Executed PUMPED STORAGE PROJECT ed- Deliverability Lake Substation Stora 500kV ge hydro SANDSTORM WIND POWER 138 10/23/2006 10/23/2006 ACTIVE Serial LGIP Wind Turbine Stora Wind Batter 60 90 150 Partial Capacity Off-Peak RIVERSIDE CA SCE Devers-Vista #1 12/31/2008 12/31/2021 Waived Complete Complete None Executed ge Turbin y Deliverability 230kV e DESERT SUNLIGHT PV I (FKA
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF Version of This Honors Project
    Running head: FINDING RENEWABLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS THROUGH GIS 1 Finding Renewable Energy Solutions Through GIS Delaney Hanson Point Loma Nazarene University Honors Research Project Committee: Lori Carter, Ph.D. (Mentor); Robert Gailey, Ph.D.; Mike Leih, Ph.D. June 18, 2021 FINDING RENEWABLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS THROUGH GIS 2 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...3 I. Background………………………………………………………………………………………………...4 A. Need for Renewable Energy………………………………………………………………..4 B. Background Required for Project………………………………………………………...5 II. Methods……………………………………………………………………………………………………...6 A. Data Search……………………………………………………………………………………….6 B. Learning to Build Maps……………………………………………………………………....7 C. Determining the Target States………………………………………………………..…..8 D. Creating the Map………………………………………………………………………………..9 III. Results……………………………………………………………………………………………………….15 A. Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………...15 B. Final Considerations……………………………………………………………………..….19 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….20 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………………………………..24 FINDING RENEWABLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS THROUGH GIS 3 Abstract This project explores Esri's ArcGIS tool and uses its functionality to map out ideal renewable energy locations in specific areas in the United States. Depending on the type of energy source, different factors are considered to draw conclusions about the best places to implement renewable energy power plants. Research into GIS data and renewable energy factors helped guide the search for the
    [Show full text]
  • Blocking the Sun
    Blocking the Sun 12 Utilities and Fossil Fuel Interests That Are Undermining American Solar Power Blocking the Sun 12 Utilities and Fossil Fuel Interests That Are Undermining American Solar Power Written by: Gideon Weissman, Frontier Group Bret Fanshaw, Environment America Research & Policy Center October 2015 Acknowledgments Environment America Research & Policy Center thanks Rosalind Jackson of VoteSolar and Gabe Elsner of the Energy and Policy Institute for their review of drafts of this document, as well as their insights and suggestions. Thanks also to Tony Dutzik and Ally Fields of Frontier Group for editorial support. Environment America Research & Policy Center thanks the Tilia Fund, the John Merck Fund, the Scherman Foundation, the Arntz Foundation, and the Fred and Alice Stanback Foundation for making this report possible. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of Environment America Research & Policy Center. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. © 2015 Environment America Research & Policy Center Environment America Research & Policy Center is a 501(c)(3) organization. We are dedicated to protecting America’s air, water and open spaces. We investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public and decision makers, and help Americans make their voices heard in local, state and national debates over the quality of our environment and our lives. For more information about Environment America Research & Policy Center or for additional copies of this report, please visit www.environmentamericacenter.org. Frontier Group provides information and ideas to help citizens build a cleaner, healthier, fairer and more democratic America.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Energy Industries Association Solar Thermal Media Compilation January 2010 – January 2011
    Solar Energy Industries Association Solar Thermal Media Compilation January 2010 – January 2011 Mentions The Boston Globe/The Green Blog- Solar thermal rebates coming soon (1/30/11) ................................................................................... 3 Las Vegas Review-Journal- Good fortune shines on solar water heating options (1/27/11) ................................................................................... 4 The Healthy Moms Magazine- Families and Solar Energy : Why it Should be Important to You (1/21/11) .............................................................. 4 Florida Today- 'Extreme' build gets a green touch (1/12/11) ....................... 7 Honolulu Star-Advertiser- Homebuilders skirt solar law (1/9/11) .................. 7 The Energy Collective- Gabby Giffords: 'The Time for Solar is Now' (1/9/11) .... 7 Solar Thermal Magazine- Pairing the Solar Thermal Collector and the Organic Rankine Cycle Turbine (12/20/10) ...................................................... 8 SolarServer- NYSERDA announces New York State 25 million dollar solar thermal incentive program (12/14/10) ........................................................... 9 Solar Home & Business Journal- New York's New Solar Thermal Incentive Draws Praise From Industry (12/14/10) ........................................................ 9 Reve- Study Identifies Mexico as Huge Solar Resource (12/10/10) ............... 10 Solar Thermal Magazine- Accelerated Solar Deployment will Create Jobs, Stimulate the Economy and Combat Global Climate
    [Show full text]