Woolly Pine Scale Stephen R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Woolly Pine Scale Stephen R Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 178 December 2010 U.S. Department of Agriculture • Forest Service Woolly Pine Scale Stephen R. Clarke1 The woolly pine scale, Pseudophilippia quaintancii Cockerell, is a soft scale insect (Heteroptera: Coccidae) which infests pines in the southeastern United States. The woolly pine scale generally is not considered economically important in forest environments, but problems may occur in areas receiving insecticide treatments, including seed orchards, Christmas tree pine (P. mugo Turra), table mountain plantations, and ornamental plantings. pine (P. pungens Lamb.), and Woolly pine scales are often found Caribbean pine (P. caribaea Morelet). cohabiting the shoots with the striped Infestations have been found only in pine scale, Toumeyella pini (King), the eastern United States from New the pine tortoise scale, T. parvicornis York to Florida and west to Louisiana. (Cockerell), and a mealybug, Oracella Though host pines occur in Texas, acuta (Lobdell). there have been no reports of woolly pine scale infestations. Range and Host Trees The recorded hosts of the woolly pine Life History and Description scale are loblolly pine (Pinus taeda The woolly pine scale has two L.), slash pine (P. elliottii Engelm. var. generations per year. Overwintered elliottii), shortleaf pine (P. echinata females at the shoot tip begin Cockerell), longleaf pine (P. palustris oviposition when the first cycle of Mill.), pitch pine (P. rigida Mill.), shoot elongation begins. The eggs sand pine (P. clausa (Chapm.)), mugo 1Forest Entomologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Southern Region, Lufkin, TX hatch almost immediately, and the first covering called a test. First generation instars, known as crawlers, emerge. adult males are wingless, brown, and The crawlers are the mobile stage, and have a short, pointed aedeagus, or sex have six legs. They are small with an organ (Figure 3). They are smaller elongate oval shape, and are yellow to than the mature females and are most red in color. First generation crawlers often observed trapped in the woolly quickly settle on the new growth, covering of the females. covering the shoot above the parent female. The settled scale insects begin Females begin egg production around secreting a white wax covering almost one week after mating. It is unknown immediately, giving the new shoot a if unmated females will produce woolly appearance (Figure 1). viable eggs. Oviposition lasts from mid-May through June in south Females have four instars. Once Georgia, and occurs several weeks settled, the females do not move, as later in the northern parts of the range. their legs become greatly reduced Dispersal takes place in the second after the crawler stage. Second instar generation, as there is little or no females are small, yellowish, and oval room on the infested shoots for female (Figure 2), but adults become plump crawlers to settle. The female crawlers and circular when swollen with eggs, are blown by the wind or crawl to and their exoskeleton hardens and uninfested new shoot growth to settle. turns dark brown. A majority of the It is possible that crawlers are carried first generation scales are females, by other insects or animals to new but a few males are also produced, host trees. Second generation females settling among the females on the new generally settle at the shoot tip and growth. initially can be detected by their woolly secretions. The males have five instars, including a prepupal and pupal stage. Males A large number of second generation develop within an elongate, waxy males are also produced, and first instar males crawl directly down the shoot and settle near the base of the previous year’s needles. Woolly pine scale infestations are easily recognizable during the second generation, as the males on the old needles secrete copious amounts of woolly wax (Figure 4), giving the tree a flocculent Figure 1. First generation females on a pine shoot. 2 appearance (Figure 5). The adult males emerge after several weeks. Emergence peaks in early July in south Georgia and is 3-3 1/2 weeks later farther north. The second generation males are winged (Figure 6), and fly to dispersed females Figure 2. Recently settled female woolly pine scale. to mate. Males of both generations a sweet, sticky substance which will mate with multiple females. provides a growth medium for sooty mold fungi. Sooty mold growth, The second generation females appear coupled with the waxy secretions to remain dormant until the following produced by the scales, may retard spring. Their woolly covering often photosynthetic activity and lead to disappears during the fall and winter, reduced tree growth. The honeydew and survivors are difficult to detect. also attracts bees, ants, and wasps Mortality rates of females during the which can become a nuisance to extended second generation can reach orchard workers or homeowners. 85 percent. Natural Enemies Damage The woolly pine scale shares natural Damage by the woolly pine scale is enemies with other soft scales of mostly cosmetic, though heavy populations may cause stunted shoot growth. The scales are sucking insects, and the removal of the sap from feeding on both the shoots and needles may weaken or stress the tree. The scales also produce honeydew, Figure 3. Wingless, first generation male. 3 Figure 4. Second generation males on older needles beneath first generation females on new growth. southern pines, including the striped generally the application of pesticides pine scale and the pine tortoise to control other species, disrupts the scale. Predators of the woolly pine normal host-natural enemy balance. scale include green lacewings, Insecticide applications may decimate Chrysopa spp., and a pyralid larva, the mobile parasites and predators, Laetilia coccidivora (Comstock). The while adult scale insects are often identified parasitoids are an aphelinid, unaffected due to their sedentary Coccophagus lycimnia Walker,and an nature and the position of the spiracles encyrtid, Metaphycus sp. and feeding stylets beneath the body. Woolly pine scales are further Causes of Outbreaks protected from the sprays by their wax secretions. The use of pyrethroid Woolly pine scales are secondary insecticides in particular appears pests, and populations normally occur to lead to scale insect outbreaks on at non-damaging levels. Though it is southern pines, and aerial applications assumed that natural enemies help are more likely to fuel infestations prevent woolly pine scale outbreaks in than ground applications. During southern pine forests, it is unknown outbreaks, the reported parasitism which species are the most important rates of the woolly pine scale were in regulating populations at low levels. under 5%, lending credence to the disruption of the natural enemies as a Woolly pine scales usually attain major factor in population eruptions. pest status only after some factor, 4 Figure 5. Pine infested by woolly pine scale. Woolly pine scale outbreaks often generations per year, and outbreaks appear as delayed problems, occurring can occur rapidly. one or two years after the initiation of insecticide treatments. This apparent Fertilization, irrigation, and even delay may be due to the fact that there insecticide application have been are only two generations per year, shown to increase egg production therefore population numbers take of scale insects, but their effects time to increase. Other secondary on woolly pine scale fecundity are pests in southern pines may have 4-5 unknown. Climatic conditions that favor increased survival, especially of dispersing second generation males and females, may be a factor in population increases. The woolly pine scale only has two generations per year throughout its range, so increased temperatures do not result in increased numbers of their Figure 6 Second generation males. 5 generations. However, warmer pine scale insects than pyrethroid temperatures for extended periods insecticides, but these broad spectrum of time could increase the number insecticides have greater negative of generations and activity of their impacts on beneficial natural enemies. natural enemies, leading to quicker woolly pine scale population declines. Heavy, drenching sprays of insecticides may kill adults, but Management this technique is not advised due to incomplete control of the scale insects, No control is generally recommended treatment costs, environmental for woolly pine scale infestations. hazards, and the potential for future Outbreaks are substantially reduced pest problems. Horticultural oils by natural enemies and perhaps also can be applied to suppress environmental factors after one to two adult populations, and have fewer years if left untreated by insecticides. negative consequences for non-target If spraying is necessary to control organisms. Systemic insecticides other pests, insecticides should be applied as a soil drench around the selected which have little residual base of the tree may be an option for activity and are the least toxic to the infested ornamental pines. Consult a natural enemy population. Ground local agricultural or forestry extension applications should be favored over agent for recommendations on which aerial spraying, and treatments type of oil or systemic insecticide to should be scheduled during periods of use and when to apply. crawler activity when feasible. If severe infestations occur, insecticidal treatments against wooly pine scales may become desirable. Applications should coincide with crawler
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • The L E Pi D 0 Pte R 1St S' Soc I E Ty
    JOURNAL OF THE L E PI D 0 PTE R 1ST S' SOC I E TY Volume 29 1975 Number 3 ROSTROLAETILIA-A NEW NORTH AMERICAN GENUS OF THE SUBFAMILY PHYCITINAE, WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF SEVEN NEW SPECIES (PYRALIDAE) ANDRE BLANCHARD P.O. Box 20304, Houston, Texas 77025 and DOUGLAS C. FERGUSON Systematic Entomology Laboratory, IIBIII, Agr. Res. Serv., USDA c/o U. S. National Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560 In his revision of the Anerastiinae (auctorum), Shaffer (1968) showed that this subfamily, which had been separated by Ragonot (1886) from the Phycitinae on the basis of a single reduction character, loss or ex­ treme reduction of the tongue, was not monophyletic. On the basis of the genitalia, he showed that some genera should remain separate from the Phycitinae and be treated under the subfamily name Peoriinae, a name previously used in a much broader sense by Hulst (1890). The remainder of the Anerastiinae, including the genus Anerastia Hubner, were considered by Shaffer to belong to the Phycitinae. For lack of sufficient information or material Shaffer left unplaced a few genera and species which he discussed briefly at the end of his revision. These are taxa that had not been treated by Heinrich (1956) because he thought that they were Anerastiinae and thus not within the scope of his revision of the Phycitinae. The present paper offers a redescription of three of these unplaced species, namely Altoona ardi­ fer ella Hulst, Aurora nigromaculella Hulst, and Parramatta placidella Barnes & McDunnough, as well as descriptions of seven new species. We were able to assign the three existing species names with confidence because the types are available, and their genitalia are distinctive.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Federal De Santa Catarina Centro De Ciências Agrárias Departamento De Fitotecnia
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE FITOTECNIA Controle biológico com Coleoptera: Coccinellidae das cochonilhas (Homoptera: Diaspididae, Dactylopiidae), pragas da “palma forrageira”. Ícaro Daniel Petter FLORIANÓPOLIS, SANTA CATARINA NOVEMBRO DE 2010 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE FITOTECNIA Controle biológico com Coleoptera: Coccinellidae das cochonilhas (Homoptera: Diaspididae, Dactylopiidae), pragas da “palma forrageira”. Relatório do Estágio de Conclusão do Curso de Agronomia Graduando: Ícaro Daniel Petter Orientador: César Assis Butignol FLORIANÓPOLIS, SANTA CATARINA NOVEMBRO DE 2010 ii Aos meus pais, por tudo, minha mais profunda gratidão e consideração. iii AGRADECIMENTOS À UFSC e à Embrapa (CPATSA) pelo apoio na realização do estágio. Ao Professor César Assis Butignol pela orientação. A todos que, de alguma forma, contribuíram positivamente na minha graduação, meus sinceros agradecimentos. iv RESUMO Neste trabalho relata-se o programa de controle biológico das cochonilhas, Diaspis echinocacti Bouché, 1833 (Homoptera: Diaspididae) e Dactylopius opuntiae Cockerell, 1896 (Homoptera: Dactylopiidae), pragas da “palma forrageira” (Opuntia ficus-indica (Linnaeus) Mill, e Nopalea cochenillifera Salm- Dyck) (Cactaceae), no semi-árido nordestino, atualmente desenvolvido pela Embrapa Semi-Árido (CPATSA) em Petrolina (PE). Os principais trabalhos foram com duas espécies de coccinelídeos predadores, a exótica Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant,
    [Show full text]
  • Cactus Moth Cactoblastis Cactorum
    Cactus Moth Cactoblastis cactorum Image credit: Ignacio Baez, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Bugwood.org, #5015068 Introduction • Native region: South America • Used as biological control agent in multiple countries for prickly pear cactus – Which is considered an invasive plant • Considered an invasive species in the United States Image credit: Jeffrey W. Lotz, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org , #5199023 History of the Cactus Moth • Australia – Prickly pear cactus infested over 60 million acres – Cactus moth introduced as biocontrol agent (1920s) – Highly successful (16 million Australia before introduction of cactus acres reclaimed) moth, 1940 • Other countries ̶ South Africa (1933), Hawaii (1950), Caribbean (1957) Image credit: Alan P. Dodd, USDA APHIS Distribution in the U.S. No sampling Sampled but not found Intercepted or detected, but not established Established by survey or consensus Under eradication Map based on NAPIS Pest Tracker, accessed 1/16/2014 The Threat • Major economic & environmental threat in the U.S. and Mexico – Agricultural – Economical – Ecological – Cultural – Ecotourism and recreational industries Damage to cactus and cactus moth larvae Image credit: Stephen Davis, USDA APHIS PPQ, Bugwood.org, #2130067 Identification • The best stage for identification of the cactus moth is the larva Younger larva – Orange or red & black bands – 25 mm to 30 mm in length Mature larva Image credit: top- Jeffrey W. Lotz, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org , #5199049; bottom - Susan Ellis, USDA APHIS PPQ, Bugwood.org, #1267002 Identification • Adult – Non-descript gray- brown – Translucent hind wings – 22 to 40 mm – Females slightly larger than males Image credit: top - Ignacio Baez, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Bugwood.org , #5015059; bottom - Jeffrey W.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory
    2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory ........................................................................................... 3 Alaska ... ........................................ ............................................................... 3 LEPIDOPTERISTS Zone 2: British Columbia .................................................... ........................ ............ 6 Idaho .. ... ....................................... ................................................................ 6 Oregon ........ ... .... ........................ .. .. ............................................................ 10 SOCIETY Volume 53 Supplement Sl Washington ................................................................................................ 14 Zone 3: Arizona ............................................................ .................................... ...... 19 The Lepidopterists' Society is a non-profo California ............... ................................................. .............. .. ................... 2 2 educational and scientific organization. The Nevada ..................................................................... ................................ 28 object of the Society, which was formed in Zone 4: Colorado ................................ ... ............... ... ...... ......................................... 2 9 May 1947 and formally constituted in De­ Montana .................................................................................................... 51 cember
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Cuban Lepidoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta)
    TERMS OF USE This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use. Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited. Zootaxa 3384: 1–59 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A list of Cuban Lepidoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta) RAYNER NÚÑEZ AGUILA1,3 & ALEJANDRO BARRO CAÑAMERO2 1División de Colecciones Zoológicas y Sistemática, Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática, Carretera de Varona km 3. 5, Capdevila, Boyeros, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba. CP 11900. Habana 19 2Facultad de Biología, Universidad de La Habana, 25 esq. J, Vedado, Plaza de La Revolución, La Habana, Cuba. 3Corresponding author. E-mail: rayner@ecologia. cu Table of contents Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Materials and methods. 2 Results and discussion . 2 List of the Lepidoptera of Cuba . 4 Notes . 48 Acknowledgments . 51 References . 51 Appendix . 56 Abstract A total of 1557 species belonging to 56 families of the order Lepidoptera is listed from Cuba, along with the source of each record. Additional literature references treating Cuban Lepidoptera are also provided. The list is based primarily on literature records, although some collections were examined: the Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática collection, Havana, Cuba; the Museo Felipe Poey collection, University of Havana; the Fernando de Zayas private collection, Havana; and the United States National Museum collection, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC. One family, Schreckensteinidae, and 113 species constitute new records to the Cuban fauna. The following nomenclatural changes are proposed: Paucivena hoffmanni (Koehler 1939) (Psychidae), new comb., and Gonodontodes chionosticta Hampson 1913 (Erebidae), syn.
    [Show full text]
  • Cactus Moth Cactoblastis Cactorum
    Cactus Moth Cactoblastis cactorum Image credit: Ignacio Baez, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Bugwood.org, #5015068 1 Introduction • Native to South America • Successful biological control agent for prickly pear cactus –In countries where prickly pear cactus is invasive • But in the US –Prickly pear cactus is native –The Cactus Moth is invasive Image credit: Jeffrey W. Lotz, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org , #5199023 The cactus moth is native to South America (Argentina, Southern Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay). It was introduced to Australia in the 1920s in an attempt to control prickly pear cactus (which is considered an invasive plant there). The biological control of the prickly pear cactus was successful there and cactus moth was later introduced into other countries, also in an attempt to control prickly pear cactus (which is considered an invasive plant in these regions). The cactus moth was first reported in the Florida Keys in 1989. In the U.S., this moth is considered a serious agricultural and environmental pest – not a beneficial biocontrol agent as prickly pear is not an invasive plant in the U.S., but is in fact a native species that is also cultivated for commercial purposes. 2 History of the Cactus Moth • Australia –Invasive Prickly pear cactus infested over 60 million acres –Cactus moth introduced as biocontrol agent –Highly successful • 16 million acres reclaimed • Successful in other countries Prickly Pear infestation in Australia, 1940 ̶ South Africa (1933), Hawaii (1950), Caribbean (1957) Image credit: Alan P. Dodd, USDA APHIS The prickly pear cactus was brought into Australia in the late 1700s in order to produce cochineal dye from cochineal insects, an important industry for clothing and garments.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorias De Avances De
    0 MEMORIAS DE AVANCES DE INVESTIGACIÓN POSGRADO EN FITOSANIDAD 2019 COLEGIO DE POSTGRADUADOS CAMPUS MONTECILLO EDITORES OBDULIA LOURDES SEGURA LEON REMIGIO ANASTACIO GUZMÁN PLAZOLA MARCO ANTONIO MAGALLANES TAPIA GONZALO ESPINOSA VÁSQUEZ COMITÉ ORGANIZADOR REMIGIO ANASTACIO GUZMÁN PLAZOLA OBDULIA LOURDES SEGURA LEÓN MARCO ANTONIO MAGALLANES TAPIA GONZALO ESPINOSA VÁSQUEZ COORDINACIÓN DE DIFUSIÓN CLAUDIA CONTRERAS ORTÍZ DISEÑO DE PORTADA JORGE VALDEZ CARRASCO Montecillo, Texcoco, México, 15 de noviembre de 2019 0 AVANCES DE INVESTIGACIÓN - POSGRADO EN FITOSANIDAD 2019 PRESENTACIÓN El evento de Avances de Investigación, tuvo su origen en 1990, como una iniciativa dentro del entonces Instituto de Fitosanidad, ahora Posgrado en Fitosanidad. En 2019, se cumplen 28 años de su inicio y por primera vez; estos se unen al festejo del 60 aniversario de la creación de los Programas que le dieron su origen: Fitopatología y Entomología, en 1959. El evento de presentación de los avances de investigación del Posgrado en Fitosanidad tiene diferentes objetivos académicos, entre estos: a) que los estudiantes de maestría y doctorado próximos a graduarse como maestros o doctores en ciencias expongan, de forma oral, los trabajos de investigación que desarrollan; b) que obtengan experiencia para presentase ante un público académico experto en el área; c) favorecer la interacción académica entre las diferentes áreas de la Fitosanidad y del Colegio de Postgraduados y d) conocer los avances científicos y tecnológicos que se desarrollan en favor de la protección
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of a Membrane-Bound C-Glucosyltransferase Responsible for Carminic Acid Biosynthesis in Dactylopius Coccus Costa
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02031-z OPEN Characterization of a membrane-bound C-glucosyltransferase responsible for carminic acid biosynthesis in Dactylopius coccus Costa Rubini Kannangara1,2, Lina Siukstaite1, Jonas Borch-Jensen3, Bjørn Madsen2, Kenneth T. Kongstad 4, Dan Staerk 4, Mads Bennedsen2, Finn T. Okkels2,6, Silas A. Rasmussen5, Thomas O. Larsen5, Rasmus J.N. Frandsen5 & Birger Lindberg Møller 1 1234567890 Carminic acid, a glucosylated anthraquinone found in scale insects like Dactylopius coccus, has since ancient times been used as a red colorant in various applications. Here we show that a membrane-bound C-glucosyltransferase, isolated from D. coccus and designated DcUGT2, catalyzes the glucosylation of flavokermesic acid and kermesic acid into their respective C- glucosides dcII and carminic acid. DcUGT2 is predicted to be a type I integral endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane protein, containing a cleavable N-terminal signal peptide and a C- terminal transmembrane helix that anchors the protein to the ER, followed by a short cytoplasmic tail. DcUGT2 is found to be heavily glycosylated. Truncated DcUGT2 proteins synthesized in yeast indicate the presence of an internal ER-targeting signal. The cleavable N- terminal signal peptide is shown to be essential for the activity of DcUGT2, whereas the transmembrane helix/cytoplasmic domains, although important, are not crucial for its cat- alytic function. 1 Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 FrederiksbergC, Denmark. 2 Chr. Hansen A/S, Bøge Alle 10-12, 2970 Hørsholm, Denmark. 3 VILLUM Center For Bioanalytical Sciences, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Woolly Pine Scale Stephen R
    Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 178 December 2010 U.S. Department of Agriculture • Forest Service Woolly Pine Scale Stephen R. Clarke1 The woolly pine scale, Pseudophilippia quaintancii Cockerell, is a soft scale insect (Heteroptera: Coccidae) which infests pines in the southeastern United States. The woolly pine scale generally is not considered economically important in forest environments, but problems may occur in areas receiving insecticide treatments, including seed orchards, Christmas tree pine (P. mugo Turra), table mountain plantations, and ornamental plantings. pine (P. pungens Lamb.), and Woolly pine scales are often found Caribbean pine (P. caribaea Morelet). cohabiting the shoots with the striped Infestations have been found only in pine scale, Toumeyella pini (King), the eastern United States from New the pine tortoise scale, T. parvicornis York to Florida and west to Louisiana. (Cockerell), and a mealybug, Oracella Though host pines occur in Texas, acuta (Lobdell). there have been no reports of woolly pine scale infestations. Range and Host Trees The recorded hosts of the woolly pine Life History and Description scale are loblolly pine (Pinus taeda The woolly pine scale has two L.), slash pine (P. elliottii Engelm. var. generations per year. Overwintered elliottii), shortleaf pine (P. echinata females at the shoot tip begin Cockerell), longleaf pine (P. palustris oviposition when the first cycle of Mill.), pitch pine (P. rigida Mill.), shoot elongation begins. The eggs sand pine (P. clausa (Chapm.)), mugo 1Forest Entomologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Southern Region, Lufkin, TX hatch almost immediately, and the first covering called a test. First generation instars, known as crawlers, emerge.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 256
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 256 Cactus-Feeding Insects and Mites JOHN MANN Director ^ The Alan Fletcher Research Station Queensland Depart?ne7it of Lands Australia SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. 1969 Publications of the United States National Museum The scientific publications of the United States National Museum include two series, Proceedings of the United States National Museum and United States National Museum Bulletin. In these series are published original ardcles and monographs dealing with the collections and work of the Museum and setting forth newly acquired facts in the field of anthropology, biology, geology, history, and technology. Copies of each publication are distributed to libraries and scientific organizations and to specialists and others interested in the various subjects. The Proceedings, begun in 1878, are intended for the publication, in separate form, of shorter papers. These are gathered in volumes, octavo in size, with the publication date of each paper recorded in the table of contents of the volume. In the Bulletin series, the first of which was issued in 1875, appear longer, separate publications consisting of monographs (occasionally in several parts) and volumes in which are collected works on related subjects. Bulletins are either octavo or quarto in size, depending on the needs of the presentation. Since 1 902, papers relating to the botanical collections of the Museum have been published in the Bulletin series under the heading Contributions from the United States National Herbarium. This work forms number 256 of the Bulletin series. Frank A. Taylor Director, United States NationaiMuseum U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Phalacrococcus Howertoni Hodges & Hodgson (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Coccidae), a New Soft Scale Record for the Island O
    Corpoica. Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria ISSN: 0122-8706 [email protected] Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria Colombia Etienne, Jean; Matile-Ferrero, Danièle; Kondo, Takumasa Phalacrococcus howertoni Hodges & Hodgson (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Coccidae), a new soft scale record for the island of Guadeloupe Corpoica. Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria, vol. 15, núm. 1, enero-junio, 2014, pp. 115- 118 Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria Cundinamarca, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=449944863004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Corpoica Cienc. Tecnol. Agropecu. (2014) 15(1) 115-118 enero - junio / 2014 115 SANIDAD VEGETAL Y PROTECCIÓN DE CULTIVOS ARTÍCULO CORTO Phalacrococcus howertoni Hodges & Hodgson (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Coccidae), a new soft scale record for the island of Guadeloupe Phalacrococcus howertoni Hodges & Hodgson (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Coccidae), nuevo registro de una escama blanda para la isla de Guadeloupe Jean Etienne¹, Danièle Matile-Ferrero², Takumasa Kondo³ ¹ Entomologist. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre Antilles-Guyane, Domaine Duclos, FR – 97170 Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe. [email protected] ² Entomologist. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département de Systématique
    [Show full text]