Rocks of the Krkonoše Tundra

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rocks of the Krkonoše Tundra Rocks of the kRkonoše tundRa Podpořeno grantem z Islandu, Lichtenštejnska a Norska. Supported by grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. Rocks of the Krkonoše Tundra Rocks and rocky outcrops are an unmis- extensive canyons, gorges, castellated takable part of a mountain range, even rocks, cliffs and castle koppies, as well though, according to their type, the char- as individual points of interest, such as acter of their geological development, waterfalls, caves, overhangs, rock towers representation and diversity of minerals, and pinnacles, balanced rocks and many climatic conditions, as well as various others. The rocks are also of importance local conditions, there are mountain for their connections with human activi- ranges which are rich in rocks, while ties, as people have long sought them others are poor. Rocky areas without out for building castles and due to their a cover of weathering products are not landscape dominance, for the construc- only a significant helper for geologists tion of various chapels, tourist chalets and geomorphologists who study these and last but not least, lookout towers mountains, but also play a fundamental and vantage points, often accessed by role for lay tourists and undemanding stairs, ladders, footbridges etc. visitors, because it is the quantity and shape of the rocks which are probably Krkonoše is a very old mountain range the most important factors in determin- and of course this also determines ing the landscape attractiveness of each its relief. Although there are certain region, i. e. its wildness and romantic exceptions, we can generally say that character. Of course there are mountain our developmentally younger moun- ranges with almost no exposed rocks, but tain ranges, where erosion is more they will never be as attractive for visitors rapid and contributes to the shaping as those ranges which are decorated by of the rocks, have a higher number of interesting rock formations. Even more rock formations than older mountain so, that they are very often connected ranges. Whatismore, neither the sedi- with other popular destinations, such as mentary rocks, such as sandstones, Dívčí kameny Tor Rock basins are the most interesting microform on granite rocks (Pielgrzymy) conglomerates, dolomites and lime- are relatively easy to see from close up. stones (the local ones belong to the crys- After the forest is felled they are perfectly talline limestones, which we now include visible, even from a distance, and in the amongst the metamorphic rocks), nor case of extensive collections of outcrops, the young volcanic rocks, which cre- we can see them as a whole. However, ate the greatest number of rock forma- the critical period comes as the new tions, are represented here in Krkonoše. growth flourishes, as it often covers the Therefore, with a few exceptions, the rocks so completely that we can forget rocks in Krkonoše are not the dominant about trying to photograph them for the relief or landscape features, but on the next few years. other hand, there are plenty of rock for- mations here. The high percentage of for- Isolated granite rocks, tors and est cover is also a certain “handicap” for the rocks, because with the exception of castle koppies the mountain ridge rock formations, the great majority of the rocks here are par- These types of rocks are the most typi- tially covered, and the lower-lying rocks cal for the summit, or tundra areas of are completely covered, by forests. Of the Krkonoše, but even here they are not rocks which are located in the forests, so numerous. The majority of them are we can observe a kind of “three-phase found at lower, montane positions in the system” from the perspective of human mountain range, so are hidden in the life. If they are in a mature forest, they forests. On the other hand, it is clearly 4 l Rocks of the Krkonoše Tundra visible that in the colder periods of the and a number of Polish localities). Some Quaternary, most of these rocks also of the castle koppies in summit areas found themselves in places with a tun- could be transformed into tors (Svinské dra climate. kameny, Pielgrzymy). At first we should explain the termino- The modelling of these types of rocks logical distinction between tors and is strongly influenced by the primary castle koppies. Genetically, the way in fracture system of the Krkonoše granite, which they were formed is the same, which formed during the solidification but they differ in the ratio between their and contraction of magma in the granite height and width (dimensions). With nar- massif already. Granite belongs to the row, tower-like tors their appearance is abyssal igneous rocks. Magma rising up clearly dominated by their height, but on from the Earth’s core was stopped deep the contrary, with castle koppies, often underneath the strata of older overlying with a quite irregular footprint, their area rocks (in Krkonoše these are schists: is the dominant feature. However, there mainly gneisses, mica schists, phyllites), are no binding criteria, so the distinction where it gradually solidified at depth is often a subjective one, and in fact, in and only emerged on the surface after many localities tors and castle koppies the erosional-denudational removal stand next to each other (Dívčí kameny of the overlying rocks. The German The rocky outcrops in the Labské jámy cirques are the largest in the Czech Republic most important is exfoliation. Exfoliation fractures most commonly have an arched character and in places, where their sloping section emerges on the surface, they may conform with the slope of the valley or cirque, where they create extensive and smooth rock plates, which are sometimes mistaken for glacial polishing by the visitors (Velká Kotelní jáma Cirque, Navorské plotny in the Labský důl Valley, the upper part of the Důl Bílého Labe valley). The forma- tion of exfoliation fracturing is explained by the unloading of the massif after the removal of the overlying crystalline rocks by erosional processes, as well as by climatic influences during the previous warm geological periods. Much more probable is a new theory, that they were already formed by primary (compres- sive) factors inside the granite pluton. The largest tor of the Svinské kameny complex Opinions on the conception of these cliffs are not entirely unanimous. Some geologists and geomorphologists look geologist H. Cloos described the frac- at them only from the perspective of ture system of granite according to the their shape and apply these terms to three basic directions of fracturing and all isolated rock formations, emerging their German names as the LQS system. above their surroundings from all direc- L are bedding-parallel fractures, mostly tions. However, the predominant opinion horizontal or slightly inclined, Q are that only rocks which meet the criteria transverse, vertical (or steep) fractures, concerning shape, but mainly those roughly perpendicular to the main, which formed in a specific two-phase Silesian Krkonoše Ridge, and S are genesis, should be referred to in this longitudinal, vertical fractures, roughly way, is undoubtedly more correct. Even perpendicular to the Q fractures. This in this case, however, the opinions of results in ashlar- to cubic-shaped blocks the geomorphologists are not complete- of rock, which we can observe in various ly uniform: for example, the age of the modifications on most of the cliffs; in individual phases but also the effect of places where the L fractures predomi- the glacial periods (ice ages) on their nate, the blocks usually transform into formation are still being discussed. a more slab-like shape. However, this is the “ideal form”, which, under the influ- Their development already began in the ence of local conditions and second- warm and damp climatic conditions of ary fracture systems can change into the interglacials in the Early Quaternary a multi-directional fracture system. Of (Pleistocene), but according to some the secondary fracture systems, the experts this began in the Late Tertiary. 6 l Rocks of the Krkonoše Tundra The groups of rocks (castle koppies the whole rocky outcrop. In this case the or tors) represent the remnants of the fracture system played a very impor- original mass of the parent material, tant role: in general the outcrops with a more resistant core (usually in places dominant bedding-parallel horizontal or where it was harder and less fractured), sub-horizontal fractures were the most which formed underground during the resistant, because the least water pen- first phase of sub-surface weathering. etrated into them. For this reason they In the climate described, this took the have retained their pillar-like shape with form of intensive chemical weathering sharp sides, and almost without weath- of the rock (granites, which form the ering products at their foot (Svinské majority of Krkonoše, are especially kameny, Dívčí kameny, Słonecznik). susceptible to this), the result of which These rocks were later transformed by are fine-grained weathering products, weathering, including frost weathering, most commonly called coarse sand mainly in the form of rounding of the by laymen. In the second phase, after edges of individual blocks, which could the climatic changes and the onset take on the shape of an oven, or even of a temperate to cold climate, these a ball, or rarely, a false balanced rock or hard sections were exhumed, because a true balanced rock. the surrounding fine-grained weather- ing products (often coarse-sandy) were On the contrary, where the predominant rapidly transported away as a result fractures were vertical and sub-vertical, of mechanical removal, and the rock respectively where irregular fractures were formations began to emerge on the abundant, water penetrated the rocks surface, rising above the surrounding more easily and deeper into the massif, relief and landscape.
Recommended publications
  • Historical Background of the Contact Between Celtic Languages and English
    Historical background of the contact between Celtic languages and English Dominković, Mario Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2016 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences / Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Filozofski fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:142:149845 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-27 Repository / Repozitorij: FFOS-repository - Repository of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Osijek Sveučilište J. J. Strossmayera u Osijeku Filozofski fakultet Osijek Diplomski studij engleskog jezika i književnosti – nastavnički smjer i mađarskog jezika i književnosti – nastavnički smjer Mario Dominković Povijesna pozadina kontakta između keltskih jezika i engleskog Diplomski rad Mentor: izv. prof. dr. sc. Tanja Gradečak – Erdeljić Osijek, 2016. Sveučilište J. J. Strossmayera u Osijeku Filozofski fakultet Odsjek za engleski jezik i književnost Diplomski studij engleskog jezika i književnosti – nastavnički smjer i mađarskog jezika i književnosti – nastavnički smjer Mario Dominković Povijesna pozadina kontakta između keltskih jezika i engleskog Diplomski rad Znanstveno područje: humanističke znanosti Znanstveno polje: filologija Znanstvena grana: anglistika Mentor: izv. prof. dr. sc. Tanja Gradečak – Erdeljić Osijek, 2016. J.J. Strossmayer University in Osijek Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Teaching English as
    [Show full text]
  • Cold-Climate Landform Patterns in the Sudetes. Effects of Lithology, Relief and Glacial History
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS CAROLINAE 2000 GEOGRAPHICA, XXXV, SUPPLEMENTUM, PAG. 185–210 Cold-climate landform patterns in the Sudetes. Effects of lithology, relief and glacial history ANDRZEJ TRACZYK, PIOTR MIGOŃ University of Wrocław, Department of Geography, Wrocław, Poland ABSTRACT The Sudetes have the whole range of landforms and deposits, traditionally described as periglacial. These include blockfields and blockslopes, frost-riven cliffs, tors and cryoplanation terraces, solifluction mantles, rock glaciers, talus slopes and patterned ground and loess covers. This paper examines the influence, which lithology and structure, inherited relief and time may have had on their development. It appears that different rock types support different associations of cold climate landforms. Rock glaciers, blockfields and blockstreams develop on massive, well-jointed rocks. Cryogenic terraces, rock steps, patterned ground and heterogenic solifluction mantles are typical for most metamorphic rocks. No distinctive landforms occur on rocks breaking down through microgelivation. The variety of slope form is largely inherited from pre- Pleistocene times and includes convex-concave, stepped, pediment-like, gravitational rectilinear and concave free face-talus slopes. In spite of ubiquitous solifluction and permafrost creep no uniform characteristic ‘periglacial’ slope profile has been created. Mid-Pleistocene trimline has been identified on nunataks in the formerly glaciated part of the Sudetes and in their foreland. Hence it is proposed that rock-cut periglacial relief of the Sudetes is the cumulative effect of many successive cold periods during the Pleistocene and the last glacial period alone was of relatively minor importance. By contrast, slope cover deposits are usually of the Last Glacial age. Key words: cold-climate landforms, the Sudetes 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystic Mountain © Mendip Hills AONB
    Viewpoint Mystic mountain © Mendip Hills AONB Time: 15 mins Region: South West England Landscape: rural Location: Ebbor Gorge, Somerset, BA5 3BA Grid reference: ST 52649 48742 Getting there: Park at Deer Leap car park and picnic area (on the road between Wookey Hole and Priddy) Keep an eye out for: Buzzards and other birds of prey soaring on the thermals below From this stunning vantage point we have sweeping views south across the flat land of the Somerset Levels. On a clear day, looking east you can see the dark line of hills marking out Exmoor National Park and if you look in a west south-west direction you can even spot the Bristol Channel glistening in the distance. As our eyes pan across the view they rest on a perfectly rounded knoll with a short tower on top. This is Glastonbury Tor. Claimed as the site of the legendary Vale of Avalon and the final resting place of King Arthur, the tor rises up above the flat land surrounding it and is visible for miles around. Why does the mystical Glastonbury Tor rise up out of the surrounding lowlands? First of all look straight ahead and in the middle distance you’ll see three hills which punctuate the flat landscape. From left to right they are Hay Hill, Ben Knowle Hill and Yarley Hill, part of a low ridge just south of the River Axe. Surrounding these hills the Somerset Levels are an area of low-lying farmland. The lowest point is just 0.2 metres above sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Geology in Washington, Volume I Washington Diviaion of Geology and Euth Resources Bulletin 78
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY IN WASHINGTON Volume I RICHARD W. GALSTER, Chairman Centennial Volume Committee Washington State Section, Association of Engineering Geologists WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES BULLETIN 78 1989 Prepared in cooperation with the Washington State Section of the A~ociation or Engineering Geologists ''WNatural ASHINGTON STATE Resources DEPARTMENT OF Brian Boyle • Commlssloner 01 Public Lands Ari Stearns - Sup,,rvuor Division of Geology and Earth Resources Raymond LcumanJs. Slate Geologist The use of brand or trade names in this publication is for pur­ poses of identification only and does not constitute endorsement by the Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources or the Association of Engineering Geologists. This report is for sale (as the set of two volumes only) by: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Mail Stop PY-12 Olympia, WA 98504 Price $ 27.83 Tax 2.17 Total $ 30.00 Mail orders must be prepaid; please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks or money orders payable to the Department of Natural Resources. This publication is printed on acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America. ii VOLUME I DEDICATION . ................ .. .. ...... ............ .......................... X FOREWORD ........... .. ............ ................... ..... ................. xii LIST OF AUTHORS ............................................................. xiv INTRODUCTION Engineering Geology in Washington: Introduction Richard W. Galster, Howard A. Coombs, and Howard H. Waldron ................... 3 PART I: ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND ITS PRACTICE IN WASHINGTON Geologic Factors Affecting Engineered Facilities Richard W. Galster, Chapter Editor Geologic Factors Affecting Engineered Facilities: Introduction Richard W. Galster ................. ... ...................................... 17 Geotechnical Properties of Geologic Materials Jon W. Koloski, Sigmund D. Schwarz, and Donald W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geomorphic Classification System
    A Geomorphic Classification System U.S.D.A. Forest Service Geomorphology Working Group Haskins, Donald M.1, Correll, Cynthia S.2, Foster, Richard A.3, Chatoian, John M.4, Fincher, James M.5, Strenger, Steven 6, Keys, James E. Jr.7, Maxwell, James R.8 and King, Thomas 9 February 1998 Version 1.4 1 Forest Geologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests, Pacific Southwest Region, Redding, CA; 2 Soil Scientist, Range Staff, Washington Office, Prineville, OR; 3 Area Soil Scientist, Chatham Area, Tongass National Forest, Alaska Region, Sitka, AK; 4 Regional Geologist, Pacific Southwest Region, San Francisco, CA; 5 Integrated Resource Inventory Program Manager, Alaska Region, Juneau, AK; 6 Supervisory Soil Scientist, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM; 7 Interagency Liaison for Washington Office ECOMAP Group, Southern Region, Atlanta, GA; 8 Water Program Leader, Rocky Mountain Region, Golden, CO; and 9 Geology Program Manager, Washington Office, Washington, DC. A Geomorphic Classification System 1 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 6 History of Classification Efforts in the Forest Service ............................................................... 6 History of Development .............................................................................................................. 7 Goals
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Neolithic Tor Enclosures of Southwest Britain
    The Early Neolithic Tor Enclosures of Southwest Britain By Simon R. Davies A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of Ph.D. Funded by the AHRC. i University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Along with causewayed enclosures, the tor enclosures of Cornwall and Devon represent the earliest enclosure of large open spaces in Britain and are the earliest form of surviving non-funerary monument. Their importance is at least as great as that of causewayed enclosures, and it might be argued that their proposed associations with settlement, farming, industry, trade and warfare indicate that they could reveal more about the Early Neolithic than many causewayed enclosure sites. Yet, despite being recognised as Neolithic in date as early as the 1920s, they have been subject to a disproportionately small amount of work. Indeed, the southwest, Cornwall especially, is almost treated like another country by many of those studying the Early Neolithic of southern Britain. When mentioned, this region is more likely to be included in studies of Ireland and the Irish Sea zone than studies concerning England.
    [Show full text]
  • ON APPLICATION of GLOTTOCHRONOLOGY for CELTIC LANGUAGES Dedicated to the Memory of Sergei Starostin (March 24, 1953 – September 30, 2005)
    SBORNÍK PRACÍ FILOZOFICKÉ FAKULTY BRNĚNSKÉ UNIVERZITY STUDIA MINORA FACULTATIS PHILOSOPHICAE UNIVERSITATIS BRUNENSIS A 54, 2006 — LINGUISTICA BRUNENSIA PETRA NOVOTNÁ – VÁCLAV BLAŽEK ON APPLICATION OF GLOTTOCHRONOLOGY FOR CELTIC LANGUAGES Dedicated to the memory of Sergei Starostin (March 24, 1953 – September 30, 2005) The present article continues in the series of studies published in this journal, demonstrating the application of lexicostatistics and glottochronology for vari- ous Indo-European branches, namely Germanic (Blažek & Pirochta 2004), Slavic (Novotná & Blažek 2005). Especially in the latter study the various modifications of glottochronology are explained in details. For Celtic languages two main alternative models of their internal classifica- tion were proposed. The traditional, p/q-model, is based especially on phonology, the Insular/Continental dichotomy has been argumented by morphology. Goidelic Goidelic q-Celtic Insular Celtiberian Brittonic Gaulish & Lepontic Gaulish & Lepontic p-Celtic Continental Brittonic Celtiberian (H. Pedersen, K.H. Schmidt) (P. Schrijver, C. Watkins) The lexicostatistic approach for a study of genetic relations of the Celtic lan- guages was introduced by Robert Elsie (1979; 1986; 1990). Applying lexicostatis- tic method with 100–word-list and excluding synonyms, he has got the following results for the Brittonic languages: Breton-Cornish 84.8%, Cornish-Welsh 78.8%, Breton-Welsh 73.7% (Elsie 1979, 48). In the case of the Goidelic languages, Elsie studied in details together 58 various Goidelic dialects and varieties on the basis of 184–word-list. He concludes that Manx is closer to any of the dialect group of Irish than to any of the dialect group of Scottish Gaelic (Elsie 1986, 244). The second attempt to apply the lexicostatistic approach for classification of the Celtic languages was realized, unfortunately not published, by Sergei Staros- tin, who used his own modification of glottochronology.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleostress Reconstruction of Faults Recorded in the Niedźwiedzia Cave (Sudetes): Insights Into Alpine Intraplate Tectonic of NE Bohemian Massif
    International Journal of Earth Sciences https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-021-01994-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Paleostress reconstruction of faults recorded in the Niedźwiedzia Cave (Sudetes): insights into Alpine intraplate tectonic of NE Bohemian Massif Artur Sobczyk1 · Jacek Szczygieł2 Received: 28 December 2019 / Accepted: 16 January 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Brittle structures identifed within the largest karstic cave of the Sudetes (the Niedźwiedzia Cave) were studied to reconstruct the paleostress driving post-Variscan tectonic activity in the NE Bohemian Massif. Individual fault population datasets, including local strike and dip of fault planes, striations, and Riedel shear, enabled us to discuss the orientation of the prin- cipal stresses tensor. The (meso) fault-slip data analysis performed both with Dihedra and an inverse method revealed two possible main opposing compressional regimes: (1) NE–SW compression with the formation of strike-slip (transpressional) faults and (2) WNW–ESE horizontal compression related to fault-block tectonics. The (older) NE-SW compression was most probably associated with the Late Cretaceous–Paleogene pan-regional basin inversion throughout Central Europe, as a reaction to ongoing African-Iberian-European convergence. Second WNW–ESE compression was active as of the Middle Miocene, at the latest, and might represent the Neogene–Quaternary tectonic regime of the NE Bohemian Massif. Exposed fault plane surfaces in a dissolution-collapse marble cave system provided insights into the Meso-Cenozoic tectonic history of the Earth’s uppermost crust in Central Europe, and were also identifed as important guiding structures controlling the origin of the Niedźwiedzia Cave and the evolution of subsequent karstic conduits during the Late Cenozoic.
    [Show full text]
  • Tors in Central European Mountains – Are They Indicators of Past Environments? ISSN 2080-7686
    Bulletin of Geography. Physical Geography Series, No. 16 (2019): 67–87 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bgeo-2019-0005 Tors in Central European Mountains – are they indicators of past environments? ISSN 2080-7686 Aleksandra Michniewicz University of Wroclaw, Poland Correspondence: University of Wroclaw, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8477-2889 Abstract. Tors represent one of the most characteristic landforms in the uplands and mountains of Central Europe, including the Sudetes, Czech-Moravian Highlands, Šumava/Bayerischer Wald, Fichtel- gebirge or Harz. These features occur in a range of lithologies, although granites and gneisses are particularly prone to tor formation. Various models of tor formation and development have been pre- sented, and for each model the tors were thought to have evolved under specific environmental con- ditions. The two most common theories emphasised their progressive emergence from pre-Quaternary weathering mantles in a two-stage scenario, and their development across slopes under periglacial conditions in a one-stage scenario. More recently, tors have been analysed in relation to ice sheet ex- tent, the selectivity of glacial erosion, and the preservation of landforms under ice. In this paper we describe tor distribution across Central Europe along with hypotheses relating to their formation and Key words: development, arguing that specific evolutionary histories are not supported by unequivocal evidence tors, and that the scenarios presented were invariably model-driven. Several examples from the Sudetes deep weathering, are presented to demonstrate that tor morphology is strongly controlled by lithology and structure. periglacial processes, The juxtaposition of tors of different types is not necessarily evidence that they differ in their mode glacial erosion, of origin or age.
    [Show full text]
  • Granite Landscapes, Geodiversity and Geoheritage—Global Context
    heritage Review Granite Landscapes, Geodiversity and Geoheritage—Global Context Piotr Migo ´n Institute of Geography and Regional Development, University of Wrocław, pl. Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] Abstract: Granite geomorphological sceneries are important components of global geoheritage, but international awareness of their significance seems insufficient. Based on existing literature, ten distinctive types of relief are identified, along with several sub-types, and an overview of medium-size and minor landforms characteristic for granite terrains is provided. Collectively, they tell stories about landscape evolution and environmental changes over geological timescale, having also considerable aesthetic values in many cases. Nevertheless, representation of granite landscapes and landforms on the UNESCO World Heritage List and within the UNESCO Global Geopark network is relatively scarce and only a few properties have been awarded World Heritage status in recognition of their scientific value or unique scenery. Much more often, reasons for inscription resided elsewhere, in biodiversity or cultural heritage values, despite very high geomorphological significance. To facilitate future global comparative analysis a framework is proposed that can be used for this purpose. Keywords: geoheritage; geodiversity; granite landforms; landform classification; World Heritage 1. Introduction Geoheritage is variously defined in scholarly literature, but notwithstanding rather subtle differences there is a general agreement that is refers to elements of the Earth’s geo- Citation: Migo´n,P. Granite diversity that are considered to have significant scientific, educational, cultural or aesthetic Landscapes, Geodiversity and value and are therefore subject to conservation and management [1,2]. Geodiversity, in Geoheritage—Global Context. turn, means the natural range of geological (rocks, minerals, fossils), geomorphological Heritage 2021 4 , , 198–219.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Glossary of Geomorphology
    International Association of Geomorphologists Association Internationale des Géomorphologues ALPHABETICAL GLOSSARY OF GEOMORPHOLOGY Version 1.0 Prepared for the IAG by Andrew Goudie, July 2014 Suggestions for corrections and additions should be sent to [email protected] Abime A vertical shaft in karstic (limestone) areas Ablation The wasting and removal of material from a rock surface by weathering and erosion, or more specifically from a glacier surface by melting, erosion or calving Ablation till Glacial debris deposited when a glacier melts away Abrasion The mechanical wearing down, scraping, or grinding away of a rock surface by friction, ensuing from collision between particles during their transport in wind, ice, running water, waves or gravity. It is sometimes termed corrosion Abrasion notch An elongated cliff-base hollow (typically 1-2 m high and up to 3m recessed) cut out by abrasion, usually where breaking waves are armed with rock fragments Abrasion platform A smooth, seaward-sloping surface formed by abrasion, extending across a rocky shore and often continuing below low tide level as a broad, very gently sloping surface (plain of marine erosion) formed by long-continued abrasion Abrasion ramp A smooth, seaward-sloping segment formed by abrasion on a rocky shore, usually a few meters wide, close to the cliff base Abyss Either a deep part of the ocean or a ravine or deep gorge Abyssal hill A small hill that rises from the floor of an abyssal plain. They are the most abundant geomorphic structures on the planet Earth, covering more than 30% of the ocean floors Abyssal plain An underwater plain on the deep ocean floor, usually found at depths between 3000 and 6000 m.
    [Show full text]