Designing for Low Distortion with High-Speed Op Amps by James L
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lecture 3: Transfer Function and Dynamic Response Analysis
Transfer function approach Dynamic response Summary Basics of Automation and Control I Lecture 3: Transfer function and dynamic response analysis Paweł Malczyk Division of Theory of Machines and Robots Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering Warsaw University of Technology October 17, 2019 © Paweł Malczyk. Basics of Automation and Control I Lecture 3: Transfer function and dynamic response analysis 1 / 31 Transfer function approach Dynamic response Summary Outline 1 Transfer function approach 2 Dynamic response 3 Summary © Paweł Malczyk. Basics of Automation and Control I Lecture 3: Transfer function and dynamic response analysis 2 / 31 Transfer function approach Dynamic response Summary Transfer function approach 1 Transfer function approach SISO system Definition Poles and zeros Transfer function for multivariable system Properties 2 Dynamic response 3 Summary © Paweł Malczyk. Basics of Automation and Control I Lecture 3: Transfer function and dynamic response analysis 3 / 31 Transfer function approach Dynamic response Summary SISO system Fig. 1: Block diagram of a single input single output (SISO) system Consider the continuous, linear time-invariant (LTI) system defined by linear constant coefficient ordinary differential equation (LCCODE): dny dn−1y + − + ··· + _ + = an n an 1 n−1 a1y a0y dt dt (1) dmu dm−1u = b + b − + ··· + b u_ + b u m dtm m 1 dtm−1 1 0 initial conditions y(0), y_(0),..., y(n−1)(0), and u(0),..., u(m−1)(0) given, u(t) – input signal, y(t) – output signal, ai – real constants for i = 1, ··· , n, and bj – real constants for j = 1, ··· , m. How do I find the LCCODE (1)? . -
ECE 255, MOSFET Basic Configurations
ECE 255, MOSFET Basic Configurations 8 March 2018 In this lecture, we will go back to Section 7.3, and the basic configurations of MOSFET amplifiers will be studied similar to that of BJT. Previously, it has been shown that with the transistor DC biased at the appropriate point (Q point or operating point), linear relations can be derived between the small voltage signal and current signal. We will continue this analysis with MOSFETs, starting with the common-source amplifier. 1 Common-Source (CS) Amplifier The common-source (CS) amplifier for MOSFET is the analogue of the common- emitter amplifier for BJT. Its popularity arises from its high gain, and that by cascading a number of them, larger amplification of the signal can be achieved. 1.1 Chararacteristic Parameters of the CS Amplifier Figure 1(a) shows the small-signal model for the common-source amplifier. Here, RD is considered part of the amplifier and is the resistance that one measures between the drain and the ground. The small-signal model can be replaced by its hybrid-π model as shown in Figure 1(b). Then the current induced in the output port is i = −gmvgs as indicated by the current source. Thus vo = −gmvgsRD (1.1) By inspection, one sees that Rin = 1; vi = vsig; vgs = vi (1.2) Thus the open-circuit voltage gain is vo Avo = = −gmRD (1.3) vi Printed on March 14, 2018 at 10 : 48: W.C. Chew and S.K. Gupta. 1 One can replace a linear circuit driven by a source by its Th´evenin equivalence. -
Control Theory
Control theory S. Simrock DESY, Hamburg, Germany Abstract In engineering and mathematics, control theory deals with the behaviour of dynamical systems. The desired output of a system is called the reference. When one or more output variables of a system need to follow a certain ref- erence over time, a controller manipulates the inputs to a system to obtain the desired effect on the output of the system. Rapid advances in digital system technology have radically altered the control design options. It has become routinely practicable to design very complicated digital controllers and to carry out the extensive calculations required for their design. These advances in im- plementation and design capability can be obtained at low cost because of the widespread availability of inexpensive and powerful digital processing plat- forms and high-speed analog IO devices. 1 Introduction The emphasis of this tutorial on control theory is on the design of digital controls to achieve good dy- namic response and small errors while using signals that are sampled in time and quantized in amplitude. Both transform (classical control) and state-space (modern control) methods are described and applied to illustrative examples. The transform methods emphasized are the root-locus method of Evans and fre- quency response. The state-space methods developed are the technique of pole assignment augmented by an estimator (observer) and optimal quadratic-loss control. The optimal control problems use the steady-state constant gain solution. Other topics covered are system identification and non-linear control. System identification is a general term to describe mathematical tools and algorithms that build dynamical models from measured data. -
Step Response of Series RLC Circuit ‐ Output Taken Across Capacitor
ESE 271 / Spring 2013 / Lecture 23 Step response of series RLC circuit ‐ output taken across capacitor. What happens during transient period from initial steady state to final steady state? 1 ESE 271 / Spring 2013 / Lecture 23 Transfer function of series RLC ‐ output taken across capacitor. Poles: Case 1: ‐‐two differen t real poles Case 2: ‐ two identical real poles ‐ complex conjugate poles Case 3: 2 ESE 271 / Spring 2013 / Lecture 23 Case 1: two different real poles. Step response of series RLC ‐ output taken across capacitor. Overdamped case –the circuit demonstrates relatively slow transient response. 3 ESE 271 / Spring 2013 / Lecture 23 Case 1: two different real poles. Freqqyuency response of series RLC ‐ output taken across capacitor. Uncorrected Bode Gain Plot Overdamped case –the circuit demonstrates relatively limited bandwidth 4 ESE 271 / Spring 2013 / Lecture 23 Case 2: two identical real poles. Step response of series RLC ‐ output taken across capacitor. Critically damped case –the circuit demonstrates the shortest possible rise time without overshoot. 5 ESE 271 / Spring 2013 / Lecture 23 Case 2: two identical real poles. Freqqyuency response of series RLC ‐ output taken across capacitor. Critically damped case –the circuit demonstrates the widest bandwidth without apparent resonance. Uncorrected Bode Gain Plot 6 ESE 271 / Spring 2013 / Lecture 23 Case 3: two complex poles. Step response of series RLC ‐ output taken across capacitor. Underdamped case – the circuit oscillates. 7 ESE 271 / Spring 2013 / Lecture 23 Case 3: two complex poles. Freqqyuency response of series RLC ‐ output taken across capacitor. Corrected Bode GiGain Plot Underdamped case –the circuit can demonstrate apparent resonant behavior. -
Frequency Response and Bode Plots
1 Frequency Response and Bode Plots 1.1 Preliminaries The steady-state sinusoidal frequency-response of a circuit is described by the phasor transfer function Hj( ) . A Bode plot is a graph of the magnitude (in dB) or phase of the transfer function versus frequency. Of course we can easily program the transfer function into a computer to make such plots, and for very complicated transfer functions this may be our only recourse. But in many cases the key features of the plot can be quickly sketched by hand using some simple rules that identify the impact of the poles and zeroes in shaping the frequency response. The advantage of this approach is the insight it provides on how the circuit elements influence the frequency response. This is especially important in the design of frequency-selective circuits. We will first consider how to generate Bode plots for simple poles, and then discuss how to handle the general second-order response. Before doing this, however, it may be helpful to review some properties of transfer functions, the decibel scale, and properties of the log function. Poles, Zeroes, and Stability The s-domain transfer function is always a rational polynomial function of the form Ns() smm as12 a s m asa Hs() K K mm12 10 (1.1) nn12 n Ds() s bsnn12 b s bsb 10 As we have seen already, the polynomials in the numerator and denominator are factored to find the poles and zeroes; these are the values of s that make the numerator or denominator zero. If we write the zeroes as zz123,, zetc., and similarly write the poles as pp123,, p , then Hs( ) can be written in factored form as ()()()s zsz sz Hs() K 12 m (1.2) ()()()s psp12 sp n 1 © Bob York 2009 2 Frequency Response and Bode Plots The pole and zero locations can be real or complex. -
INA106: Precision Gain = 10 Differential Amplifier Datasheet
INA106 IN A1 06 IN A106 SBOS152A – AUGUST 1987 – REVISED OCTOBER 2003 Precision Gain = 10 DIFFERENTIAL AMPLIFIER FEATURES APPLICATIONS ● ACCURATE GAIN: ±0.025% max ● G = 10 DIFFERENTIAL AMPLIFIER ● HIGH COMMON-MODE REJECTION: 86dB min ● G = +10 AMPLIFIER ● NONLINEARITY: 0.001% max ● G = –10 AMPLIFIER ● EASY TO USE ● G = +11 AMPLIFIER ● PLASTIC 8-PIN DIP, SO-8 SOIC ● INSTRUMENTATION AMPLIFIER PACKAGES DESCRIPTION R1 R2 10kΩ 100kΩ 2 5 The INA106 is a monolithic Gain = 10 differential amplifier –In Sense consisting of a precision op amp and on-chip metal film 7 resistors. The resistors are laser trimmed for accurate gain V+ and high common-mode rejection. Excellent TCR tracking 6 of the resistors maintains gain accuracy and common-mode Output rejection over temperature. 4 V– The differential amplifier is the foundation of many com- R3 R4 10kΩ 100kΩ monly used circuits. The INA106 provides this precision 3 1 circuit function without using an expensive resistor network. +In Reference The INA106 is available in 8-pin plastic DIP and SO-8 surface-mount packages. Please be aware that an important notice concerning availability, standard warranty, and use in critical applications of Texas Instruments semiconductor products and disclaimers thereto appears at the end of this data sheet. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. PRODUCTION DATA information is current as of publication date. Copyright © 1987-2003, Texas Instruments Incorporated Products conform to specifications per the terms of Texas Instruments standard warranty. Production processing does not necessarily include testing of all parameters. www.ti.com SPECIFICATIONS ELECTRICAL ° ± At +25 C, VS = 15V, unless otherwise specified. -
Transistor Basics
Transistor Basics: Collector The schematic representation of a transistor is shown to the left. Note the arrow pointing down towards the emitter. This signifies it's an NPN transistor (current flows in the direction of the arrow). See the Q1 datasheet at: www.fairchildsemi.com. Base 2N3904 A transistor is basically a current amplifier. Say we let 1mA flow into the base. We may get 100mA flowing into the collector. Note: The Emitter currents flowing into the base and collector exit through the emitter (the sum off all currents entering or leaving a node must equal zero). The gain of the transistor will be listed in the datasheet as either βDC or Hfe. The gain won't be identical even in transistors with the same part number. The gain also varies with the collector current and temperature. Because of this we will add a safety margin to all our base current calculations (i.e. if we think we need 2mA to turn on the switch we'll use 4mA just to make sure). Sample circuit and calculations (NPN transistor): Let's say we want to heat a block of metal. One way to do that is to connect a power resistor to the block and run current through the resistor. The resistor heats up and transfers some of the heat to the block of metal. We will use a transistor as a switch to control when the resistor is heating up and when it's cooling off (i.e. no current flowing in the resistor). In the circuit below R1 is the power resistor that is connected to the object to be heated. -
Linear Time Invariant Systems
UNIT III LINEAR TIME INVARIANT CONTINUOUS TIME SYSTEMS CT systems – Linear Time invariant Systems – Basic properties of continuous time systems – Linearity, Causality, Time invariance, Stability – Frequency response of LTI systems – Analysis and characterization of LTI systems using Laplace transform – Computation of impulse response and transfer function using Laplace transform – Differential equation – Impulse response – Convolution integral and Frequency response. System A system may be defined as a set of elements or functional blocks which are connected together and produces an output in response to an input signal. The response or output of the system depends upon transfer function of the system. Mathematically, the functional relationship between input and output may be written as y(t)=f[x(t)] Types of system Like signals, systems may also be of two types as under: 1. Continuous-time system 2. Discrete time system Continuous time System Continuous time system may be defined as those systems in which the associated signals are also continuous. This means that input and output of continuous – time system are both continuous time signals. For example: Audio, video amplifiers, power supplies etc., are continuous time systems. Discrete time systems Discrete time system may be defined as a system in which the associated signals are also discrete time signals. This means that in a discrete time system, the input and output are both discrete time signals. For example, microprocessors, semiconductor memories, shift registers etc., are discrete time signals. LTI system:- Systems are broadly classified as continuous time systems and discrete time systems. Continuous time systems deal with continuous time signals and discrete time systems deal with discrete time system. -
S-Parameter Techniques – HP Application Note 95-1
H Test & Measurement Application Note 95-1 S-Parameter Techniques Contents 1. Foreword and Introduction 2. Two-Port Network Theory 3. Using S-Parameters 4. Network Calculations with Scattering Parameters 5. Amplifier Design using Scattering Parameters 6. Measurement of S-Parameters 7. Narrow-Band Amplifier Design 8. Broadband Amplifier Design 9. Stability Considerations and the Design of Reflection Amplifiers and Oscillators Appendix A. Additional Reading on S-Parameters Appendix B. Scattering Parameter Relationships Appendix C. The Software Revolution Relevant Products, Education and Information Contacting Hewlett-Packard © Copyright Hewlett-Packard Company, 1997. 3000 Hanover Street, Palo Alto California, USA. H Test & Measurement Application Note 95-1 S-Parameter Techniques Foreword HEWLETT-PACKARD JOURNAL This application note is based on an article written for the February 1967 issue of the Hewlett-Packard Journal, yet its content remains important today. S-parameters are an Cover: A NEW MICROWAVE INSTRUMENT SWEEP essential part of high-frequency design, though much else MEASURES GAIN, PHASE IMPEDANCE WITH SCOPE OR METER READOUT; page 2 See Also:THE MICROWAVE ANALYZER IN THE has changed during the past 30 years. During that time, FUTURE; page 11 S-PARAMETERS THEORY AND HP has continuously forged ahead to help create today's APPLICATIONS; page 13 leading test and measurement environment. We continuously apply our capabilities in measurement, communication, and computation to produce innovations that help you to improve your business results. In wireless communications, for example, we estimate that 85 percent of the world’s GSM (Groupe Speciale Mobile) telephones are tested with HP instruments. Our accomplishments 30 years hence may exceed our boldest conjectures. -
Fully-Differential Amplifiers
Application Report S Fully-Differential Amplifiers James Karki AAP Precision Analog ABSTRACT Differential signaling has been commonly used in audio, data transmission, and telephone systems for many years because of its inherent resistance to external noise sources. Today, differential signaling is becoming popular in high-speed data acquisition, where the ADC’s inputs are differential and a differential amplifier is needed to properly drive them. Two other advantages of differential signaling are reduced even-order harmonics and increased dynamic range. This report focuses on integrated, fully-differential amplifiers, their inherent advantages, and their proper use. It is presented in three parts: 1) Fully-differential amplifier architecture and the similarities and differences from standard operational amplifiers, their voltage definitions, and basic signal conditioning circuits; 2) Circuit analysis (including noise analysis), provides a deeper understanding of circuit operation, enabling the designer to go beyond the basics; 3) Various application circuits for interfacing to differential ADC inputs, antialias filtering, and driving transmission lines. Contents 1 Introduction . 3 2 What Is an Integrated, Fully-Differential Amplifier? . 3 3 Voltage Definitions . 5 4 Increased Noise Immunity . 5 5 Increased Output Voltage Swing . 6 6 Reduced Even-Order Harmonic Distortion . 6 7 Basic Circuits . 6 8 Circuit Analysis and Block Diagram . 8 9 Noise Analysis . 13 10 Application Circuits . 15 11 Terminating the Input Source . 15 12 Active Antialias Filtering . 20 13 VOCM and ADC Reference and Input Common-Mode Voltages . 23 14 Power Supply Bypass . 25 15 Layout Considerations . 25 16 Using Positive Feedback to Provide Active Termination . 25 17 Conclusion . 27 1 SLOA054E List of Figures 1 Integrated Fully-Differential Amplifier vs Standard Operational Amplifier. -
MOS Amplifier Basics
ECE 2C Laboratory Manual 2 MOS Amplifier Basics Overview This lab will explore the design and operation of basic single-transistor MOS amplifiers at mid-band. We will explore the common-source and common-gate configurations, as well as a CS amplifier with an active load and biasing. Table of Contents Pre-lab Preparation 2 Before Coming to the Lab 2 Parts List 2 Background Information 3 Small-Signal Amplifier Design and Biasing 3 MOSFET Design Parameters and Subthreshold Currents 5 Estimating Key Device Parameters 7 In-Lab Procedure 8 2.1 Common-Source Amplifier 8 Common-Source, no Source Resistor 8 Linearity and Waveform Distortion 8 Effect of Source and Load Impedances 9 Common-Source with Source Resistor 9 2.2 Common-Gate Amplifier 10 2.3 Amplifiers with Active Loading 11 Feedback-Bias Amplifier 11 CMOS Active-Load CS Amplifier 12 1 © Bob York 2 MOS Amplifier Basics Pre-lab Preparation Before Coming to the Lab Read through the lab experiment to familiarize yourself with the components and assembly sequence. Before coming to the lab, each group should obtain a parts kit from the ECE Shop. Parts List The ECE2 lab is stocked with resistors so do not be alarmed if you kits does not include the resistors listed below. Some of these parts may also have been provided in an earlier kit. Laboratory #2 MOS Amplifiers Qty Description 2 CD4007 CMOS pair/inverter 4 2N7000 NMOS 4 1uF capacitor (electrolytic, 25V, radial) 8 10uF capacitor (electrolytic, 25V, radial) 4 100uF capacitor (electrolytic, 25V, radial) 4 100-Ohm 1/4 Watt resistor 4 220-Ohm 1/4 Watt resistor 1 470-Ohm 1/4 Watt resistor 4 10-KOhm 1/4 Watt resistor 1 33-KOhm 1/4 Watt resistor 2 47-KOhm 1/4 Watt resistor 1 68-KOhm 1/4 Watt resistor 4 100-KOhm 1/4 Watt resistor 1 1-MOhm 1/4 Watt resistor 1 10k trimpot 2 100k trimpot © Bob York Background Information 3 Background Information Small-Signal Amplifier Design and Biasing In earlier experiments with transistors we learned how to establish a desired DC operating condition. -
Simplified, Physically-Informed Models of Distortion and Overdrive Guitar Effects Pedals
Proc. of the 10th Int. Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx-07), Bordeaux, France, September 10-15, 2007 SIMPLIFIED, PHYSICALLY-INFORMED MODELS OF DISTORTION AND OVERDRIVE GUITAR EFFECTS PEDALS David T. Yeh, Jonathan S. Abel and Julius O. Smith Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA) Stanford University, Stanford, CA [dtyeh|abel|jos]@ccrma.stanford.edu ABSTRACT retained, however, because intermodulation due to mixing of sub- sonic components with audio frequency components is noticeable This paper explores a computationally efficient, physically in- in the audio band. formed approach to design algorithms for emulating guitar distor- tion circuits. Two iconic effects pedals are studied: the “Distor- Stages are partitioned at points in the circuit where an active tion” pedal and the “Tube Screamer” or “Overdrive” pedal. The element with low source impedance drives a high impedance load. primary distortion mechanism in both pedals is a diode clipper This approximation is also made with less accuracy where passive with an embedded low-pass filter, and is shown to follow a non- components feed into loads with higher impedance. Neglecting linear ordinary differential equation whose solution is computa- the interaction between the stages introduces magnitude error by a tionally expensive for real-time use. In the proposed method, a scalar factor and neglects higher order terms in the transfer func- simplified model, comprising the cascade of a conditioning filter, tion that are usually small in the audio band. memoryless nonlinearity and equalization filter, is chosen for its The nonlinearity may be evaluated as a nonlinear ordinary dif- computationally efficient, numerically robust properties.