Diamondback Moth and Its Natural Enemies in Jamaica and Some Other Caribbean Islands M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diamondback Moth and Its Natural Enemies in Jamaica and Some Other Caribbean Islands M 26 Diamondback Moth and its Natural Enemies in Jamaica and Some Other Caribbean Islands M. M. Alam CARDI, University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Kingston 7, Jamaica, W.I. Abstract Diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella (L.)) is widely distributed in the Caribbean. In Jamaica, amongst 14 pest species feeding on cabbage, cauliflower and other crucifers, diamondback moth, cabbage white butterfly and armyworms inflict the highest damage. The combined crop damage from these pests ranges from 74 to 100%, averaging 79%. Of these, diamondback moth alone represents over 75% of the pest populations, causing up to 90% crop loss. The highest (February 1989) and lowest (August 1989) populations per plant were 43 and 1 larvae in Douglas Castle and 63 and 2 larvae, respectively, in Castle Kelly areas. In Jamaica, five parasite species, viz. Trichogramma sp., Diadegma insulare, Cotesia ( = Apanteles) sp. (glomeratus group), Oomyzus ( = Tetrastichus) sokolowskii and Trichospilus diatraeae were found parasitizing different developmental stages of the pest. Additionally, Coleomegilla maculata, Cycloneda sanguinea, Toxomerus dispar, Toxomerus watsoni and Pseudodorus clavatus; Ceraeochrysa claveri, and Belonuchus gagates were preying upon them. The fungi Beauveria bassiana, Hirsutella sp. and Paecylomyces sp. were found infecting larvae and pupae in the plains and sub-mountain areas. During March 1989, a larval parasite Cotesia plutellae was introduced from Barbados. Soon after its release at the University of the West lndies Mona Campus and Bodles Agricultural Experimental Station, it was recovered. Between March 1989 and July 1990, the levels of parasitism at Bodles, ranged from 5.4 to 88.7% (average 51%). As a result of high mortality caused by C. plutellae, the diamondback moth populations were reduced significantly. Since the establishment of C. plutellae in Jamaica, four species of hyperparasites, Aphanogmus (= Ceraphron) fijiensis, Horismenus sp. (a new species), Catolaccus sp. (a new species) and Spilochalcis sp. (a new species) were found attacking the cocoons. Spilochalcis sp. also attacks the cocoons of D. insulare. Introduction Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) , cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) and other cruciferous crops are important in the diet of Caribbean people. Cabbage is the most widely grown in Jamaica, fetching high market prices (US$0.22-0.68/kg).Between 1973 and 1986 cabbage production increased significantly (from 6985 to 15,150 tons) (Ministry of Agriculture, unpublished reports for 1973 to 1986). The potential for these crops is, however, limited because of insect pests. Out of 14 insect species feeding on crucifers, the diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), is the most important. In Jamaica as well as other parts of the world, when insecticides are not used, crop losses caused by DBM may reach 50-100% (Calderan and Hare 1986 and Sagenmuller and Rose 1986). Because of its high reproductive capability and its ability to develop pesticide resistance quickly, it has become less susceptible to conventional insecticides (Ankersmit 1953, Calderon and Hare 1986, Lim and Khoo 1986; Miyata et al. 1986, Morallo-Rejesus 1986; and Suah and Ellis 1974). 233 234 Alam In Jamaica, insecticides recommended since 1968, and now ineffective, include malathion, galecron, gardona, dipterex, diazinon, carbaryl, surecide, DDT, belmark and deltamethrin (Suah and Ellis 1974), whilst Thuricide, Biotrol, permethrin, methomyl and profenofos are of questionable reliability. The general pest management and environmental, occupational and consumer health problems created by insecticides have forced the field entomologists to put greater reliance on biological control. In the Caribbean, the Ministry of Agriculture Barbados and the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control (CIBC) (now International Institute of Biological Control (IZBC)) Trinidad, West Indies, initiated research on the biological control of DBM in the 1970s and was later extended to the eastern Caribbean islands by the Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute (CARDI) (Alam 1974, 1982; Bennett and Yaseen 1972). This report deals with research done in Jamaica with brief mention of the status of natural enemies in other Caribbean islands. Methodology The evaluation of the insect pests and their natural enemies was done monthly. Field visits were made to a number of farm sites in different parishes in Jamaica. For more regular observations, fields were selected in three ecological zones; Castle Kelly (plains: elevation 457 m), Douglas Castle (610m) and Blue Mountain (hills : 1219 m) (Fig. 1). Besides their ecological differences, these are major cabbage-growing areas. Trial plots were also established at Bodles Agricultural Experimental Station. The following sampling technique was adapted: From a 0.04 ha field five cabbage plants were taken at random and brought to the laboratory for detailed examination. The plants were weighed, every leaf examined and all stages of the pest(s) recorded. Eggs, larvae and pupae of the pests were isolated in glass vials and kept to rear out their natural enemies or the adult stage. Data on the amount of damage caused to each cabbage head by various insect pests, and their relative abundance, were measured on a rated scale. The parasites reared from immature stages of the pests (i.e. eggs, larvae and pupae) were recorded and their levels of parasitism calculated. Adults and immature stages of predatory insects and pathogens collected in the field were also recorded. Information on hyperparasites attacking primary parasites was gathered. The biology of important parasites was studied in the laboratory. Fig. 1. Areas of observation for DBM studies in Jamaica. Natural Enemies in Jamaica 235 Results Fourteen species of insect pests and three species of slugs were found feeding on cabbage, cauliflowers and other crucifers. The most important of these were the DBM, cabbage looper (CL) (Trichoplusia ni Hübner), armyworms (Spodoptera/frugiperda (J. E. Smith) and Spodoptera latifascia (Walker), (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), cabbage white-butterfly [Ascia monuste (L.), Lepidoptera: Pieridae] and cabbage aphid [Brevicoryne brassicae (L:), Hemiptera: Homoptera: Aphididae]. In the Blue Mountain areas, besides these pests, a pyralid [Evergestis rimosalis (Guenee), Lepidoptera:Pyralidae] was found damaging the crop. In Douglas Castle three species of slugs Leidyula portoricensis, Leidyula sp. and Sarasinula plebeia (Veronicellidae) caused heavy crop losses. Pest Status Alam (1982) reported that in the Caribbean where crucifers are grown throughout the year, and conditions exist for continuous breeding of DBM which causes serious crop losses to farmers, the application of insecticides at short intervals (two or three applications/ week) resulted in the development of insect resistance to some chemicals (Alam 1974). In Jamaica, the combined crop damage caused by various defoliators ranges from 74 to 100%. Of these, DBM represents over 75% of the pest population, causing up to 90% of the crop damage. When the DBM population is reduced, it gives way to the build-up of other defoliators, particularly CL. Distribution and population levels of DBM in Jamaica Between March 1988 to July 1990, irrespective of the ecological variations, DBM was equally important in the plains, sub-mountains and hilly areas. Peak population varied for each area. In Castle Kelly the highest number of DBM was recorded in February 1988, June 1989 and February 1990, in Douglas Castle in April and July 1988, February, May and December 1989 and January and February 1990 and in Blue Mountains in May and September 1989 with a moderate peak in July 1989. Generally the population tended to be low in August and October in all observation sites. In Castle Kelly, the lowest number of DBM was recorded in March, May, August and November 1988, May and July to December 1989, and May 1990. In Douglas Castle it was in August 1988 and August to October 1989, and in Blue Mountains in June, August and October 1989. Larval population per plant also varied. The maximum number of DBM larvae per plant recorded in Castle Kelly and Douglas Castle was 63 and 43 respectively in February 1989, and the minimum of two larvae/plant from the former and one larva/plant from the latter locality in August 1989. In Blue Mountains 38 larvae/plant were collected in May and 23 larvae/plant in June 1989. At Bodles Agricultural Experimental Station the sample populations from each field investigation varied from 34 to 518 larvae per month, with an average of 229 larvae/month for the period April 1989 to March 1990. Natural enemies In spite of heavy use of chemical insecticides against DBM and other defoliators on cabbage and cauliflowers in the Caribbean, a number of natural enemies remain active in the fields, providing significant control. Alam (1974, 1982) reported Trichogrammasp. (Hymenoptera:Trichogrammatidae), Cotesia (= Apanteles) sp. (ater group) (Hymenoptera:Braconidae:Cotesiini)and Spilochalcis hirtifemora (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera:Chalcididae) attacking eggs, larvae and pupae of DBM, respectively, in Barbados. Besides these, three species of coccinellids, seven of ground beetles (Carabidae), two of ‘Jack Spaniard’ wasps (Vespidae), three of ants (Formicidae), two of lacewing 236 Alam bugs (Chrysopidae) and one each of earwig (Carcinophoridae) and centipede (Scolopendridae) were found preying upon the pest(s). Yaseen (1974) reported Cotesia sp. (ater
Recommended publications
  • Twenty-Five Pests You Don't Want in Your Garden
    Twenty-five Pests You Don’t Want in Your Garden Prepared by the PA IPM Program J. Kenneth Long, Jr. PA IPM Program Assistant (717) 772-5227 [email protected] Pest Pest Sheet Aphid 1 Asparagus Beetle 2 Bean Leaf Beetle 3 Cabbage Looper 4 Cabbage Maggot 5 Colorado Potato Beetle 6 Corn Earworm (Tomato Fruitworm) 7 Cutworm 8 Diamondback Moth 9 European Corn Borer 10 Flea Beetle 11 Imported Cabbageworm 12 Japanese Beetle 13 Mexican Bean Beetle 14 Northern Corn Rootworm 15 Potato Leafhopper 16 Slug 17 Spotted Cucumber Beetle (Southern Corn Rootworm) 18 Squash Bug 19 Squash Vine Borer 20 Stink Bug 21 Striped Cucumber Beetle 22 Tarnished Plant Bug 23 Tomato Hornworm 24 Wireworm 25 PA IPM Program Pest Sheet 1 Aphids Many species (Homoptera: Aphididae) (Origin: Native) Insect Description: 1 Adults: About /8” long; soft-bodied; light to dark green; may be winged or wingless. Cornicles, paired tubular structures on abdomen, are helpful in identification. Nymph: Daughters are born alive contain- ing partly formed daughters inside their bodies. (See life history below). Soybean Aphids Eggs: Laid in protected places only near the end of the growing season. Primary Host: Many vegetable crops. Life History: Females lay eggs near the end Damage: Adults and immatures suck sap from of the growing season in protected places on plants, reducing vigor and growth of plant. host plants. In spring, plump “stem Produce “honeydew” (sticky liquid) on which a mothers” emerge from these eggs, and give black fungus can grow. live birth to daughters, and theygive birth Management: Hide under leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysoperla Carnea by Chemical Cues from Cole Crops
    Biological Control 29 (2004) 270–277 www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Mediation of host selection and oviposition behavior in the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella and its predator Chrysoperla carnea by chemical cues from cole crops G.V.P. Reddy,a,* E. Tabone,b and M.T. Smithc a Agricultural Experiment Station, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA b INRA, Entomologie et Lutte Biologique, 37 Bd du Cap, Antibes F-06606, France c USDA, ARS, Beneficial Insect Introduction Research Unit, University of Delaware, 501 S. Chapel, St. Newark, DE 19713-3814, USA Received 28 January 2003; accepted 15 July 2003 Abstract Host plant-mediated orientation and oviposition by diamondback moth (DBM) Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Ypo- nomeutidae) and its predator Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) were studied in response to four different brassica host plants: cabbage, (Brassica oleracea L. subsp. capitata), cauliflower (B. oleracea L. subsp. botrytis), kohlrabi (B. oleracea L. subsp. gongylodes), and broccoli (B. oleracea L. subsp. italica). Results from laboratory wind tunnel studies indicated that orientation of female DBM and C. carnea females towards cabbage and cauliflower was significantly greater than towards either broccoli or kohlrabi plants. However, DBM and C. carnea males did not orient towards any of the host plants. In no-choice tests, oviposition by DBM did not differ significantly among the test plants, while C. carnea layed significantly more eggs on cabbage, cauliflower, and broccoli than on kohlrabi. However, in free-choice tests, oviposition by DBM was significantly greater on cabbage, followed by cauliflower, broccoli, and kohlrabi, while C.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetable Insects Department of Entomology
    E-99-W Vegetable Insects Department of Entomology MANAGING INSECT PESTS OF COMMERCIALLY GROWN CRUCIFERS Ricky E. Foster, Extension Entomologist The crucifers include cabbage, caulifl ower, broccoli, The following practices will reduce cabbage maggot injury. Brussels sprouts, turnips, radishes, kale, rutabaga, mustard, • Disk crop residues immediately after harvest to reduce collards, horseradish, and other crucifers. All of the crucifers overwintering populations. are subject to attack by insects. Some, such as radishes, can • Plant in well-drained soils when soil temperatures exceed usually be grown without insect damage and others, such as 50°F. cabbage, must be managed carefully to avoid serious insect • Do not plant in fi elds to which animal manure has been damage. recently applied or in which a cover crop has been plowed down within 3-4 weeks of planting. CABBAGE MAGGOTS • Use the soil insecticides diazinon, Lorsban, or Capture LFR in the seed furrow or as transplant drenches. The fi rst insect of concern on crucifers is usually the cab- bage maggot. Cabbage maggot overwinters as pupae in the FLEA BEETLES soil. The fl ies, slightly smaller than a housefl y, emerge from the soil in late April or early May and lay white eggs at the Flea beetles are almost always a pest of crucifers, es- bases of newly set plants. Emergence usually coincides with pecially early in the growing season. Flea beetles are small, the time when yellow rocket, a common weed, is in full bloom. hard-shelled insects, so named because their enlarged hind Larvae from this fi rst generation tunnel in the roots of legs allow them to jump like fl eas when disturbed.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing IPM Packages for Vegetable Crops in West Africa and South Asia
    Developing IPM Packages for Vegetable Crops in West Africa and South Asia Douglas G. Pfeiffer Dept. of Entomology Countries in West African IPM CRSP Senegal, Mali, Ghana West African team Senegal, Mali, Ghana US: Doug Pfeiffer, Don Mullins, Carlyle Brewster, Jim Westwood, Pat Hipkins, Bob Gilbertson, Sally Miller, George Mbata Mali: Kadiatou Toure Gamby, Moussa Noussourou, Aminata Dolo, Sidiki Traore, Issa Sidibe Senegal: Emile Coly, Dienaba Sall Ghana: Michael Osei, Brandford Mochiah, Eric Cornelius Initial planning Initial planning Dogon Country Dogon Country Field visits in Senegal, Mali Obstacles Extension resources Obstacles Extension resources Pesticides readily available – insufficient knowledge Obstacles Extension resources Pesticides readily available – insufficient knowledge Obstacles Extension resources Pesticides readily available – insufficient knowledge In one field, containers for: lamba cyhalothrin/acetamiprid deltamethrin methomyl cartap abamectin Bt West Africa IPM Packages •Objective 1: Develop and implement an IPM package for tomato in Ghana, Mali and Senegal. •Objective 2: Develop and implement potato IPM packages in Mali and Senegal •Objective 3: Develop and implement IPM packages for cabbage in Mali, Senegal, with new addition of Ghana What is an IPM Package •Essentially the same as an IPM program •A set of practices to present to farmer, that address pest management issues from site selection through harvest, that when followed, assure a crop produced in a sustainable fashion West Africa IPM Packages •Objective
    [Show full text]
  • Diamondback Moth
    FS232 Fact sheet For a comprehensive list of our publications visit Insect Pests of the Home Garden Series www.rcre.rutgers.edu Diamondback Moth Gerald M. Ghidiu, Ph.D., Extension Specialist in Vegetable Entomology Adult (moth) Larva and damage Pupa Injury: spots down the back (hence the name, “diamondback moth”). The female’s wings are uniformly brownish. Diamondback moth larvae are usually minor pests of Larvae are yellowish-green in color, small (up to 1/3 cabbage and related plants in New Jersey. When the inch long), tapered at both ends, have very fine erect population is low, feeding damage appears as small black hairs scattered over their body, and display holes from beneath the leaf but not completely nervous, wriggling movements when disturbed. If through to the upper surface of the leaf, or as very touched, they often wriggle backwards over the leaf small, numerous pinholes, generally to older leaves on edge and hang by a silk-like thread. the outer portion of the plant. In cooler weather, young larvae mine within the leaf. When the larval population is high, plants may become riddled with Life History: holes, resulting in poor quality or unmarketable Diamondback moths, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus), heads. Damage is generally more severe during dry overwinter in cabbage residues or crop debris, weather conditions. emerging in late spring. Females deposit small, round, yellowish-white eggs on the underside of leaves. Description: Young larvae can become fully grown in 20–25 days and attach themselves to the underside of the leaf in The adult diamondback moths are small, grayish- a small, delicate-appearing, lace-like cocoon which brown moths, about 3/5 inch across, with white loosely covers the pupa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pathogens of Diamondback Moth and Their Potential for Its Control A
    The Pathogens of Diamondback Moth and Their Potential for its Control a Review Neil Wilding Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom Abstract The larvae and less frequently the pupae of Plutella xylostella (L) are sometimes attacked naturally by pathogens, particularly two fungi of the family Entomophthoraceae, Erynia blunckii and Zoophthora radicans. Other pathogens recorded include one other entomophthoraceous fungus, a granulosis virus, one or possibly two nucleopolyhedrosis viruses and Bacillus thuringiensis var kurstaki. In the laboratory, larvae were also susceptible to strains of several deuteromycete fungi, other nucleopolyhedrosis viruses and several varieties of B. thuringiensis. Of these pathogens, only B. thuringiensis is produced commercially and the derived products are used to control P. xylostella in the field. The bacterium, however, spreads inefficiently between host individuals and for effective control, as with chemical insecticides, repeated applications are necessary. Laboratory tests indicate that E. blunckii, Z. radicans, some of the deuteromycetes and certain viruses, all of which spread readily between individuals, may have potential as control agents. While none of these is produced commercially, methods for their mass cultivation are available though they need development. For each of these pathogens further laboratory and field trials are needed to select the most infective strains and to test application methods and formulations. Introduction The diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L) (Lepidoptera: Ypono- meutidae), occurs throughout the world wherever crucifers are grown. Its recorded distribution has been mapped (CIE 1967). In many areas DBM causes little damage, probably because its numbers are held in check by natural enemies (Hardy 1938). In the UK the insect is widespread but causes only sporadic damage chiefly in the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Melonworm, Diaphania Hyalinata Linnaeus (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Crambidae)1 John L
    EENY163 Melonworm, Diaphania hyalinata Linnaeus (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Crambidae)1 John L. Capinera2 Distribution about 0.7 mm in length and 0.6 mm in width. Hatching occurs after 3–4 days. Melonworm, Diaphania hyalinata Linnaeus, occurs throughout most of Central and South America and the Caribbean. It also has been reported from Africa (Mohaned et al. 2013). The United States is the northern limit of its permanent range, and wintertime occurrence generally is limited to south Florida and perhaps south Texas. Melon- worm disperses northward annually. Its distribution during the summer months is principally the southeastern states, though occasionally it disperses north to New England and the Great Lakes region. Life Cycle and Description The melonworm can complete its life cycle in about 30 days. It is present throughout the year in southern Florida, where it is limited mostly by availability of host plants. It disperses northward annually, usually arriving in northern Florida in Figure 1. Eggs and newly hatched larva of melonworm, Diaphania June and other southeastern states in July, where no more hyalinata Linnaeus, on foliage. than three generations normally occur before cold weather Credits: Rita Duncan, UF/IFAS kills the host plants. Larva Egg There are five instars. Total larval development time is about 14 days, with mean (range) duration of the instars Melonworm moths deposit oval, flattened eggs in small about 2.2 (2-3), 2.2 (2-3), 2.0 (1-3), 2.0 (1-3), and 5.0 (3-8) clusters, often averaging two to six overlapping eggs per days, respectively. Head capsule widths are about 0.22, 0.37, egg mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Diamondback Moth in North America A
    50 Insecticide Resistance of Diamondback Moth in North America A. M. Shelton and J. A. Wyman¹ New York State Agricultural Experiment Station. Geneva. New York 14456. USA 'University of Wisconsin,. Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA Abstract The extent and geographic distribution of resistance to methomyl, permethrin and methamidophos in 44 populations of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) from 19 states within the U.S., Mexico, Canada and Belize was determined in 1988. Widespread resistance to all three insecticides was confirmed. Resistance was generally highest in populations originating from southern states but scattered populations with high levels of resistance were also detected in northern states. In most instances where resistance was detected to one insecticide, there was also resistance to the other two. Highest levels of resistance were detected for methomyl. During 1989, diamondback moth was imported into New York on southern cabbage transplants (seedlings). During June, when most transplants arrived in New York, DBM infestations were as high as 12.8 insects per 100 transplants on an individual shipment. Compared to a standard susceptible field population, the diamondback moth which were collected from transplants had moderate to high (> 100-fold in one case) levels of resistance to permethrin and methomyl. In 1990, eleven diamondback moth populations were surveyed for susceptibility to two commercial formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis. High levels of resistance (in some cases > 200-fold) were found in populations which originated from Florida. Introduction The diamondback moth (DBM) Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera:Yponomeutidae)is a key pest of cruciferous crops throughout the world. In tropical and subtropical areas, crucifer production has been seriously affected in recent years by DBM which has developed resistance to a wide range of insecticides (Sun et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Diamondback Moth (DBM) on Cabbage Plutella Xylostella (Syn
    PEST MANAGEMENT DECISION GUIDE: GREEN AND YELLOW LIST Diamondback moth (DBM) on cabbage Plutella xylostella (syn. maculipennis) Esa Prevention Monitoring Direct Control Direct Control Restrictions l Plant cabbage in March to June, or l Start monitoring for moths l Use overhead irrigation l When using a pesticide or botanical, always wear before September to avoid high when cabbage is at 4-leaf which can reduce moth protective clothing and follow the instructions on the incidences of egg laying moths stage, scout for small light populations by dislodging product label. l Rotate with non-Brassicas such as greenish, sometimes grey- the pest from the plant onions, legumes and cereals for at greenish, thin larvae on leaves surface l Do not use chemicals with the same mode of action year after year as this can lead to resistance. Always consult Adult diamondback moth least 2 years and stems l Plant trap crops such as the most recent list of registered pesticides of MOFA, (©Georg Goergen/IITA Insect l Continue inspecting weekly mustard and rape at the Museum, Cotonou, Benin) l Remove all crop debris including Ghana weeds at least 4 weeks prior to especially on the underside of edges of the field to reduce the leaves DBM attack sowing to reduce moth population l Spray Bt based insectide l WHO class III (Slightly l Transplant only healthy seedlings l Look out for DBM larvae which l Collect and destroy moth e.g. Bypel 1 (Perisrapae hazardous) PHI-14 days; free of eggs, caterpillars and when disturbed, will rapidly eggs and larvae by crushing Granulosis virus + Bacillus REI 1 Day, spray at 14 pupae of the the moth wriggle their bodies back and or keeping in a bucket of thuringiensis), 550g/Ha, days interval, ensure forth soapy water Stomach poison IRAC 11A thorough spray l Slash left-over cabbage stems coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Biological Evidence for the Presence of a Male Sex Pheromone of the Diamondback Moth Y
    11 Morphological and Biological Evidence for the Presence of a Male Sex Pheromone of the Diamondback Moth Y. S. Chow, Y. M. Lin, and H. J. Teng Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC Abstract In the present study, besides morphological evidence, two bioassays, antenna-excision and hairpencil-excision, were used to demonstrate the presence of a male sex pheromone of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella L. Although the antenna-excision bioassay demonstrated that a male aphrodiasic pheromone exists in the diamondback moth, it was proven to be not as important as the female sex pheromone in mating. After the hairpencils of males were excised, the mating success of the females decreased significantly, suggesting that the male hairpencils might play a role in the mating of the female diamondback moth. introduction Hairpencils, highly specialized scales, are present on the integument of the males of various lepidopteran species. They are exposed during the pre-courtship rituals that lead to various species-specific behavior patterns (Grant and Brady 1975, Baker and Carde 1979, Rutowski 1980, Hirai et al 1981). This hasbeen studied in tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens). The release of an airborne chemical by these organs suppresses the emission of the sex pheromone secreted by the female (Hendricks and Shaver 1975). However, Clearwater (1972) reported that Mythimna separate (Walker) produced a pheromone from hairpencils and suggested that the major component, benzaldehyde, acted as an arrestant that prevented the escape of the female during courtship. On the other hand, Gothilf and Shorey (1976) found that in cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni) the scent of the male moth was not an essential component in courtship behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Approach to Male Diamondback Moth Response to Sex Pheromone C
    12 Ecological Approach to Male Diamondback Moth Response to Sex Pheromone C. J. William Maa Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan, ROC Abstract Natural populations of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L) were collected from five different vegetable fields and the response of males to a synthetic female sex pheromone was monitored using a Y-test in the laboratory throughout the year. Mass trapping of adult males using five blends of the pheromone was also conducted in the field. The antennal esterase activity of diamondback moth was monitored by the use of either 1-naphthylacetate or 14C (Z)-11 -hexadecenyl acetate as substrates. In addition, zymograms of antennal esterase were studied by poly-acrylamide gel electrophoresis. Fifth instar larvae of the moth were monitored for malathion resistance. It was found that variations in the pheromone response of adult males to trinary of (Z)-1I-hexadecenal, (Z)-1 1-hexadecenyl acetate, and (Z)-11- hexadecen-1-01, were age dependent. Assays of antennal esterase activity were positively correlated with the behavior of the male moth. Antennal esterase zymograms revealed 10 bands, each with different characteristics. The pheromone hydrolytic activity of antennal esterase of male adults had a high titer which was coincident with a high rate of malathion degradation activity in the larval stage of the moth. However, this is not interrelated with a strong pheromone response by male adults. Two cycles of male response alternated during the year. Relative humidity was possibly the major factor affecting the male response to the pheromone blends. Temperature may play only a minor role in the response in tropical Taiwan.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Diaphania Hyalinata (Linnaeus) and D. Nitidalis (Stoll)(Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on Melothria Pendula L.(Cucurbitaceae) in the Lara State, Venezuela
    ISSN: 1684-9086 e-ISSN:2305-0683 http://dx.doi.org/10.18004/investig.agrar.2019.diciembre.136-141 NOTA DE INVESTIGACIÓN Primer Registro de Diaphania hyalinata (Linnaeus) y D. nitidalis (Stoll) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) sobre Melothria pendula L. (Cucurbitaceae) en el estado Lara, Venezuela First record of Diaphania hyalinata (Linnaeus) and D. nitidalis (Stoll) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on Melothria pendula L. (Cucurbitaceae) in the Lara state, Venezuela Tarcisio José Capote Luna1, Evelin Antonieta Arcaya Sánchez1* y Dilcia María Hernández Juárez1 1 Universidad Centroccidental “Lisandro Alvarado” (UCLA), Decanato de Agronomía, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas. Lara, Venezuela. *Autor para correspondencia: RESUMEN [email protected] Diaphania hyalinata (Linnaeus) y D. nitidalis (Stoll) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) son Conflicto de interés: especies fitófagas de importancia económica en cucurbitáceas. En este estudio se Los autores declaran no tener reportan por primera vez para el estado Lara, Venezuela a D. hyalinata y D. nitidalis conflicto de interés. sobre Melothria pendula L. (Cucurbitaceae) como planta hospedante natural y se amplía el registro del área de distribución de D. nitidalis para éste estado. Licencia: Artículo publicado en acceso Palabras clave: Barrenador del pepino, plagas en cucurbitáceas, distribución de abierto con una licencia Creative Diaphania, gusano del melón Commons CC-BY Historial: ABSTRACT Recibido: 11/09/18; Diaphania hyalinata (Linnaeus) and D. nitidalis (Stoll) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) are Aceptado: 05/07/19 phytophagous species of economic importance in cucurbits. This study reports for the first time for Lara state, Venezuela on D. hyalinata and D. nitidalis on Melothria pendula Periodo de Publicación: Julio-Diciembre de 2019 L. (Cucurbitaceae) as a natural host plant and the distribution of D.
    [Show full text]