DOCSLIB.ORG

Families Threaten to Boycott IRA Birmingham Pub Bombs Inquest’

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Families Threaten to Boycott IRA Birmingham Pub Bombs Inquest’ Networked Knowledge Media Reports Networked Knowledge IRA Bombing Cases Homepage This page set up by Dr Robert N Moles [Underlining, where it occurs is for NetK editorial emphasis] On 17 February 2019 Mark Townsend of The Guardian reported ‘Families threaten to boycott IRA Birmingham pub bombs inquest’ Crisis talks to be held after legal aid is cut and key British intelligence files go missing Bereaved families and lawyers are threatening to boycott the long-awaited inquests into the 1974 IRA Birmingham pub bombings because of concern over missing documents, lack of legal funding and what the process can deliver. They are anxious that the inquest’s frame of reference has become so limited that it will yield little insight into the circumstances surrounding the two bombings that killed 21 people and wounded 220. Compounding their concern is the lack of disclosure of vital evidence and the fact that key files that would have shed light on the explosions at Birmingham’s Mulberry Bush and Tavern in the Town pubs have disappeared. On Friday, with the five-week inquest due to commence from 25 February, the law firm representing half of the families of bombing victims was told its application for a well- resourced legal team had been rejected. The Legal Aid Agency awarded the Northern Ireland firm KRW LAW LLP only a tenth of the funding it had requested for its 10 clients, leaving it dwarfed by the size and resources available to the publicly funded legal team of police officers and government officials. On Saturday a crowdfunding page was set up in a late attempt to pay for greater legal representation. However, families have warned that crisis talks will take place this week over whether they will officially boycott the inquest. Julie Hambleton, sister of one of the victims, 18-year-old Maxine Hambleton, said the legal funding decision was the latest in a series of demoralising developments. “Something is seriously amiss, it’s absolutely outrageous. We are meant to have a judiciary system that is the envy of the world, but we’re going to be left with more questions than we started with,” said Hambleton. Christopher Stanley of KRW said the integrity of the inquest was of serious concern to his clients. He said: “We could walk away, we could boycott it. We could advise on that. We have discussed putting down tools because we have to act in the best interests of our clients. An intelligent person in their position might say: ‘What is the point in me engaging in this?’” Families fear the hearings will focus primarily on the nature of the IRA warnings before the bombings and the response of the emergency services on the night of 21 November 1974. The coroner has already ruled out investigating whether an informer was embedded within the IRA cell responsible for the bombings after a pre-inquest hearing last month heard there was “no evidence” of a state agent involvement. He has also infuriated families by excluding all evidence relating to the perpetrators. The Birmingham Six were wrongly jailed for 18 years over the bombings before proving their innocence. On Wednesday, the former Labour MP Chris Mullin identified two of the four men he alleged were responsible. Stanley said: “If one of the purposes of complex multi- death inquests is to allay rumours and suspicion, then this will not.” Disclosure is another vexed issue, with Hambleton “incredulous” that so far no police force or government department – including the Home Office, the Foreign Office and the Ministry of Defence, as well as MI5, MI6 and military intelligence – has said that it holds material relating to the atrocity. Of particular concern are two folders belonging to the joint intelligence committee, examining information from the security services, GCHQ and military intelligence, which have gone missing and are understood to have contained “movements of the IRA”. To date, 28,000 pages of evidence have been disclosed but lawyers and families are curious about the files they will not see. “We know nothing, what search engine terms have been used or how many people are searching. We don’t know what the coroner has seen,” said Stanley. He is also worried that there has been no application for public interest immunity (PII), the legal device that means sensitive testimony is not made public in court to protect the national interest. The lack of PII applications for the Birmingham inquest has raised predictions that no contentious testimony will be heard. Also causing consternation is that despite the threat of an IRA bombing campaign at the time, no state agency appears to have produced any guidelines, policies or protocols on how to prevent or respond to a bomb threat or explosion. The lack of a policy may explain why, before the blasts, officers were sent to search empty offices in Birmingham’s Rotunda building above the Mulberry Bush but failed to evacuate the pub itself. Ten of the victims died in the pub and dozens more were seriously wounded. “There were either no policies in place, or there were policies in place but they hadn’t trickled down. We would expect a file of protocols and policies from the Cabinet Office downwards,” said Stanley. One option for the families, if they decide to boycott the inquest, would be to pursue a judge- led inquiry along the lines of the 2011 investigation by Sir William Gage into the death of Baha Mousa, who died in British army custody in Iraq. Stanley said that they could consider folding the Birmingham inquest and the recently resumed inquest into the 1974 Guildford pub bombings, in which five people were killed. The Birmingham pub bombings came at the height of the Troubles in Northern Ireland. Detonating at 8:17pm inside the Mulberry Bush and ten minutes later at the Tavern in the Town, the devices were planted during a concerted mainland bombing campaign by the IRA. The month before the Birmingham attacks, October 1974, two pubs in Guildford, Surrey, were targeted and four British soldiers and one civilian killed by bombs left by the Provisional IRA. Two weeks before the Birmingham bombings, a British soldier and a civilian were killed and 28 injured when the IRA threw a bomb through the window of the Kings Arms pub in Woolwich, England. The year, 1974, culminated with the Provisional IRA announcing a Christmas ceasefire, but not before they carried out a bomb attack on the home of former Prime Minister Edward Heath, who was not injured. More than 3,500 people were killed during the Troubles, of whom 52% were civilians, 32% were members of the British security forces, and 16% were paramilitary group members. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/feb/17/birmingham-ira-pub-bombs-families- threaten--boycott .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dziadok Mikalai 1'St Year Student
    EUROPEAN HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY Program «World Politics and economics» Dziadok Mikalai 1'st year student Essay Written assignment Course «International relations and governances» Course instructor Andrey Stiapanau Vilnius, 2016 The Troubles (Northern Ireland conflict 1969-1998) Plan Introduction 1. General outline of a conflict. 2. Approach, theory, level of analysis (providing framework). Providing the hypothesis 3. Major actors involved, definition of their priorities, preferences and interests. 4. Origins of the conflict (historical perspective), major actions timeline 5. Models of conflicts, explanations of its reasons 6. Proving the hypothesis 7. Conclusion Bibliography Introduction Northern Ireland conflict, called “the Troubles” was the most durable conflict in the Europe since WW2. Before War in Donbass (2014-present), which lead to 9,371 death up to June 3, 20161 it also can be called the bloodiest conflict, but unfortunately The Donbass War snatched from The Troubles “the victory palm” of this dreadful competition. The importance of this issue, however, is still essential and vital because of challenges Europe experience now. Both proxy war on Donbass and recent terrorist attacks had strained significantly the political atmosphere in Europe, showing that Europe is not safe anymore. In this conditions, it is necessary for us to try to assume, how far this insecurity and tensions might go and will the circumstances and the challenges of a international relations ignite the conflict in Northern Ireland again. It also makes sense for us to recognize that the Troubles was also a proxy war to a certain degree 23 Sources, used in this essay are mostly mass-media articles, human rights observers’ and international organizations reports, and surveys made by political scientists on this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Knows No Borders
    TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS October 2019 his is a special initiative for SEFF to be associated with, it is one part of a three part overall Project which includes; the production of a Book and DVD Twhich captures the testimonies and experiences of well over 20 innocent victims and survivors of terrorism from across Great Britain and The Republic of Ireland. The Project title; ‘Terrorism knows NO Borders’ aptly illustrates the broader point that we are seeking to make through our involvement in this work, namely that in the context of Northern Ireland terrorism and criminal violence was not curtailed to Northern Ireland alone but rather that individuals, families and communities experienced its’ impacts across the United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland and beyond these islands. This Memorial Quilt Project does not claim to represent the totality of lives lost across Great Britain and The Republic of Ireland but rather seeks to provide some understanding of the sacrifices paid by communities, families and individuals who have been victimised by ‘Republican’ or ‘Loyalist’ terrorism. SEFF’s ethos means that we are not purely concerned with victims/survivors who live within south Fermanagh or indeed the broader County.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Full PDF
    Safety, Liberty, and Islamist Terrorism American and European Approaches to Domestic Counterterrorism Gary J. Schmitt, Editor The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 15200 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214. To order call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 or call 1-800-862-5801. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schmitt, Gary James, 1952– Safety, liberty, and Islamist terrorism : American and European approaches to domestic counterterrorism / Gary J. Schmitt. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8447-4333-2 (cloth) ISBN-10: 0-8447-4333-X (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-8447-4349-3 (pbk.) ISBN-10: 0-8447-4349-6 (pbk.) [etc.] 1. United States—Foreign relations—Europe. 2. Europe—Foreign relations— United States. 3. National security—International cooperation. 4. Security, International. I. Title. JZ1480.A54S38 2010 363.325'16094—dc22 2010018324 13 12 11 10 09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cover photographs: Double Decker Bus © Stockbyte/Getty Images; Freight Yard © Chris Jongkind/ Getty Images; Manhattan Skyline © Alessandro Busà/ Flickr/Getty Images; and New York, NY, September 13, 2001—The sun streams through the dust cloud over the wreckage of the World Trade Center. Photo © Andrea Booher/ FEMA Photo News © 2010 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Wash- ington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or repro- duced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Failure, Guilt, Confession, Redemption? Revisiting
    Journal of Psychosocial Studies Volume 10, Issue 1, May 2017 Failure, guilt, confession, redemption? Revisiting unpublished research through a psychosocial lens MARCUS FREE Abstract This article offers some critical reflections on a case of failure to bring a qualitative research project to completion and publication earlier in the author’s career. Possible explanations are considered in light of insights derived from the ‘psychosocial’ turn in qualitative research associated particularly with Hollway and Jefferson’s Doing Qualitative Research Differently (2001/2013). The project was an interview-based study of the life experiences of middle aged and older Irish emigrants in England, conducted in the late 1990s in Birmingham and Manchester. The article considers the failure as a possible psychic defence against the anxiety that completion and publication would be a betrayal of the interviewees, many of whom described experiences distressing to themselves and the interviewer. The psychoanalytic concepts of ‘transference’ and ‘countertransference’ are used to speculate as to the role of the unconscious at work in the interview encounters and how, despite class and generational differences, psychodynamic fantasies relating to both interviewees’ and interviewer’s migration histories and experiences may have impacted upon each other. Introduction Many researchers leave unfinished projects behind them and experience varying degrees of regret and uncertainty as to the reasons for reluctance or inability to bring the research to fruition. This article concerns a qualitative research project from earlier in my career that never reached completion and remains a source of guilt and shame for me. It revisits the research critically using a psychosocial lens in an attempt to identify and consider the possible underlying reasons for this failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethno-Nationalist Terrorism and Political Concessions: a Comparative Analysis of PIRA and ETA Campaigns
    Ethno-nationalist Terrorism and Political Concessions: A Comparative Analysis of PIRA and ETA Campaigns By Semir Dzebo Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Nick Sitter Word Count: 17,096 CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2017 ABSTRACT Wanting to assess what makes the difference between failure and success in terrorist groups’ campaigns, this research looks at two ethno-nationalist terrorist groups: Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) and Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA). This thesis, unlike the majority of contemporary terrorism scholarship focused on religious terrorism, places the spotlight on ethno- nationalist terrorism as it is the type of terrorism most likely to succeed in obtaining political concessions. The research stems from the similarity between the PIRA and ETA cases, despite having ended differently. Employing historical facts and relevant literature, three plausible hypotheses are tested as possible answers to the research question. Each one is based around a different independent variable: goals, support, and strategy. Providing that the hypotheses may all be factors in the outcome, afterwards they are compared and ranked in terms of their explanatory value. Based on the findings, support appears to be the highest explanatory variable. The argument made in this thesis is that the difference in support was likely due to the nature of ethno-nationalist terrorism that is very dependent on its ethnic constituency. Moreover, this thesis argues that what presumably accounts for the difference in support, in these two cases, arises from the nature of violence in which the campaign is embedded.
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham Pub Bombings: What We Know’
    Networked Knowledge Media Reports Networked Knowledge IRA Bombing Cases Homepage This page set up by Dr Robert N Moles 12 March 2019, the BBC reported ‘Birmingham pub bombings: What we know’ More than 40 years ago 21 people were killed by bombs in two Birmingham pubs. No-one has been brought to justice for the murders, although members of the IRA are believed to have been responsible. BBC News looks at what we know about the killings. What were the Birmingham pub bombings? On the evening of 21 November 1974, hundreds of people, many who were young and out with friends, family and work colleagues, chatted in two busy Birmingham city centre pubs. Meanwhile, a man telephoned the Birmingham Post and Mail to warn two bombs had been planted in the city centre. Officers in Birmingham, which had seen a spate of IRA bombings during the mainland campaign, rushed to the scene, but were too late. At 20:17 GMT a bomb exploded in a duffel bag in the Mulberry Bush pub in the Rotunda building, killing 10 people. Minutes later a second bomb went off in the Tavern in the Town leaving 11 more dead. A total of 220 people were also injured in what was, at the time, the worst terrorist atrocity on English soil. Who were the victims? The 21 people killed - seven women and 14 men - were aged between 16 and 51. Thirteen of the victims were under 30, including five in their teens. Over the decades stories have emerged of those who died and some of the people seriously injured have spoken of their experience and the lasting effect it had on them.
    [Show full text]
  • Call for Inquest Into IRA Guildford Pub Bombings to Be Reopened’
    Networked Knowledge Media Reports Networked Knowledge IRA Bombing Cases Homepage This page set up by Dr Robert N Moles [Underlining, where it occurs is for NetK editorial emphasis] On 2 November 2017 Owen Bowcott and Ian Cobain of The Guardian reported ‘Call for inquest into IRA Guildford pub bombings to be reopened’ Lawyers acting for sister of Gerry Conlon, who was wrongfully jailed for 15 years, call for completion of process for five who died. Lawyers representing two individuals affected by the IRA’s 1974 Guildford pub bombings have asked the Surrey coroner to reopen the inquest into the five victims who died, which has never been completed. The Belfast-based firm KRW Law has written to Richard Travers saying that the victims’ relatives and those who suffered miscarriages of justice have been denied their right to “truth, justice and accountability”. The move follows the firm’s success in reviving the inquest into the 1974 Birmingham pub bombings, although that process has now been delayed by arguments over the scope of the new investigation. In the Guildford case, KRW Law has been instructed by Ann McKearnan, the sister of Gerry Conlon, one of the so-called Guildford Four who were wrongfully imprisoned for 15 years for the attacks. It is also working with a former soldier who survived the explosion in the town’s Horse and Groom Pub which killed four soldiers and a civilian. A second bomb detonated at a nearby pub, the Seven Stars, injuring eight people. One of the survivors of the Horse and Groom bombing, an off-duty soldier, later recalled: “I had just leaned forward to get up to buy my round when there was a bang.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/28/2021 12:11:54AM Via Free Access 234 Global Jihadist Terrorism
    11. National counter-terrorism responses: United Kingdom Paul Burke POLITICAL AND SECURITY CONTEXT OF UK TERRORISM The evolution of the various definitions of terrorism in the United Kingdom (UK) is central to understanding the political and security background of what has evolved into the UK’s counter-terrorism (CT) landscape. The his- torical context of the UK’s CT legislation is derived in large part from the problems of Irish and Northern Irish terrorism. Although the problem can be traced back as far as the Eleven Years War (1641‒1653), a more pragmatic starting point is ‘the Troubles’ and the bombing campaign that came with their expansion in the early 1970s. Days after the Birmingham pub bombings, which killed 21 people and injured 182 more on 21 November 1974, the Irish Republican Army (IRA), the prime suspect for the attacks, was proscribed and the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act (PTA) became law (Walker, 1992, pp. 31–32; Donohue, 2000, pp. 2–5). One of the provisions of the PTA allowed the police to detain and question terrorist suspects for up to seven days. Other extraordinary measures were introduced, with varying degrees of success in combating the problem of terrorism. To combat the rise of intimidation of juries in terrorism cases in Northern Ireland, a drastic solu- tion was introduced: the so-called ‘Diplock Courts’ (Arthur and Jeffrey, 1996). Instead of the traditional use of a jury and a judge, the Diplock Courts instead employed a sole judge to hear the initial case. Any further hearings or appeals were subsequently heard by a panel of three judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Ucin1070571375.Pdf (2.43
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI DATE: November 10, 2003 I, Craig T. Cobane II , hereby submit this as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctorate of Philosophy in: Political Science It is entitled: Terrorism and Democracy The Balance Between Freedom and Order: The British Experience Approved by: Richard Harknett James Stever Thomas Moore Terrorism and Democracy The Balance Between Freedom and Order: The British Experience A dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) in the Department of Political Science of the College of Arts and Sciences 2003 by Craig T. Cobane II B.S., University of Wisconsin-Green Bay 1990 M.A., University of Cincinnati 1992 Committee Chair: Richard J. Harknett, Ph.D. Abstract The British Government has been engaged for more than thirty years in a struggle with terrorism related to Northern Ireland. During what is euphemistically called the Troubles, the British government has implemented a series of special emergency laws to address the violence. Drawing upon the political context and debate surrounding the implementation and development of the emergency legislation this research examines the overall effect of British anti-terrorism legislation on both respect for civil liberties and the government’s ability to fight campaigns of violence. Drawing heavily upon primary sources, high profile cases of miscarriages of justice and accusation of an official ‘shoot to kill’ policy this project explores three distinct areas related to a government’s balancing of the exigencies of individual liberty and societal order.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter 2
    Notes Introduction 1. For example, before Walker (2004a) the last book that was written on the UUP was by John Harbinson (1973). Hume (1996) also contains some inter­ esting data but is far from comprehensive. The DUP has had more recent analysis but Bruce (1989) and Smyth, C. (1987) are now over fifteen years old and the party has developed significantly since those books were written. Chapter 1 1. Alvin Jackson has encountered similar difficulties in analysing Unionist historiography. He made the distinction between 'Unionist historians' and 'Historians of Unionism'; one of the key distinctions was a declaration of interest Oackson, 1996, 121). 2. He cites Ronan Bennett and Robert Ballagh, although these are not the only examples that could be utilised, and Ruth Dudley Edwards quotes prominent journalist and writer Tim Pat Coogan as remarking at a conference that Unionists had no culture (Dudley Edwards, 2000, 351). 3. Advert in back of Hume (1996). 4. Ulster Review, Issue 18, Winter 1995/1996. 5. Although one Unionist called his book 'intellectual Lundyism', Alex Kane quoted in Jardin (1997). 6. The book won the prestigious Christopher Ewart-Biggs Memorial Prize. 7. See http://www.sluggerotoole.com/archives/2005/05/david_trimbles.php and http://www.sluggerotoole.com/archives/2005/05/uup_insiders_pl.php accessed 13 May 2005. Chapter 2 1. This would appear to have been at the request of the British, and not Irish, government. See Cochrane (1997, 129-31) for a discussion on an offer made to Molyneaux on Privy Council terms to sign the Agreement in August 1985. 2. For the classic account of Unionist resistance to the third Home Rule bill, see Stewart (1967).
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Acts Uk
    TERRORISM ACTS UK https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_Great_Britain List of terrorist incidents in Great Britain The following is a list of terrorist incidents in Great Britain, including incidents where people were arrested under the terrorist laws and later released without charge, but excluding events in Northern Ireland – a part of the United Kingdom. Contents • Attacks involving violence or serious threat to life • 1970s • 1980s • 1990s • 2000s • 2010–present • Prevented, failed or aborted attacks • Arrests, detentions, and other incidents related to the Terrorism Acts • See also • References Attacks involving violence or serious threat to life 1970s § 1971, 12 January: Two bombs exploded at the house of government minister Robert Carr. This attack was one of 25 carried out by the Angry Brigade between August 1970 and August 1971. The Bomb Squad was established at Scotland Yard in January 1971 to target the group, and they were apprehended in August of that year.[1][2] § 1971, 31 October: A bomb exploded in the Post Office Tower in London causing extensive damage but no injuries. The "Kilburn Battalion" of the IRA claimed responsibility for the explosion.[3] § 1972, 22 February: The Official Irish Republican Army killed seven civilians in the Aldershot bombing. § 1972, 19 September: The group Black September posted a letter bomb to the Israeli embassy in London killing an Israeli diplomat.[4] § 1973: The Provisional IRA exploded a car bomb in the street outside the Old Bailey. A shard of glass is preserved as a reminder, embedded in the wall at the top of the main stairs. § 1973, 10 September: The Provisional IRA set off bombs at London's King's Cross Station and Euston Station injuring 21 people.[5] § 1974, 4 February: Eight soldiers and 4 civilians killed by the Provisional IRA in the M62 coach bombing.
    [Show full text]
  • I Greaves. Terrorism
    J R Army Med Corps 2001; 147: 142-146 J R Army Med Corps: first published as 10.1136/jramc-147-02-06 on 1 June 2001. Downloaded from SPECIAL ARTICLE Terrorism – New threats, new challenges? I Greaves Introduction indistinct and broader movements. Groups The conviction of David Copeland for the appear to be more loosely connected or bombings which culminated in the atrocity at indirectly linked through networks of the Admiral Duncan in Soho, London on professional (full time) terrorists and Friday 30th April 1999 has given us another amateur supporters, sympathisers and would eponymous terrorist, the Soho Bomber, to add be terrorists who may lack the expertise of to a long catalogue of those who chose such their more established counterparts. methods to further their political, sectarian The absence of any central command or or personal aspirations. Yet the Soho Bomb authority is significant in that it may be a was in a number of ways different to the long factor in removing any previous inhibitions run of more familiar terrorist atrocities. This on the terrorist’s desire to inflict widespread article reviews the changing demographics of casualties. In addition, the potential terrorism and their likely effects on law locations for terrorist atrocities are likely to enforcement and the health services be much more diverse than before: we are all response. potential victims, irrespective of location. The victimisation of traditional terrorist The New Terrorism? adversaries is likely to be much less obvious In the past, terrorism has been largely than previously. practiced by groups of individuals belonging It seems characteristic of the new terrorist to an identifiable organisation with defined that no responsibility is claimed for incidents.
    [Show full text]