Court File No. Ontario SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE OR ARRANGEMENT OF SEARS CANADA INC., CORBEIL ÉLECTRIQUE INC., S.L.H. TRANSPORT INC., THE CUT INC., SEARS CONTACT SERVICES INC., INITIUM LOGISTICS SERVICES INC., INITIUM COMMERCE LABS INC., INITIUM TRADING AND SOURCING CORP., SEARS FLOOR COVERING CENTRES INC., 173470 CANADA INC., 2497089 ONTARIO INC., 6988741 CANADA INC., 10011711 CANADA INC., 1592580 ONTARIO LIMITED, 955041 ALBERTA LTD., 4201531 CANADA INC., 168886 CANADA INC., AND 3339611 CANADA INC. APPLICANTS BOOK OF AUTHORITIES OF THE APPLICANTS June 21, 2017 OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP Box 50, 1 First Canadian Place Toronto, ON M5X 1B8 Marc Wasserman LSUC# 44066M Email: [email protected] Jeremy Dacks LSUC# 41851R Email: [email protected] Michael De Lellis LSUC# 48038U Email: [email protected] Karin Sachar LSUC# 59944E [email protected] Fax: 416.862.6666 Lawyers for the Applicants - 2 - TO: SERVICE LIST TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab 1. Campeau v Olympia & York Developments Ltd (1992), 14 CBR (3d) 303 (Ont Gen Div) 2. Century Services Inc v Canada (Attorney General), 2010 SCC 60 3. Norcen Energy Resources Ltd v Oakwood Petroleums Ltd, 1988 CarswellAlta 318 (QB) 4. Re 4519922 Canada Inc, 2015 ONSC 124 5. Re Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc, (January 28, 2011), BC Sup Ct, Action No-S110587 (Initial Order) 6. Re Canwest Global Communications Corp, 2009 CarswellOnt 6184 (Sup Ct) 7. Re Canwest Publishing Inc/Publications Canwest Inc, 2010 ONSC 222 8. Re Cinram International Inc, 2012 ONSC 3767 9. Re Cline Mining Corp, 2014 ONSC 6998 10. Re Comark Inc, 2015 ONSC 2010 11. Re Cow Harbour Construction Ltd, (April 28, 2010), Alta QB, Action No 1003-05560 (Transcript) 12. Re Essar Steel Algoma Inc, 2015 ONSC 7656 13. Re Essar Steel Algoma Inc, Ont Sup Ct, CV-0011169-00CL, Affidavit of Rajah Marwah, sworn November 9, 2015. 14. Re Essar Steel Algoma Inc (November 9, 2015), Ont Sup Ct, CV-0011169-00CL (Endorsement) 15. Re Essar Steel Algoma Inc (November 9, 2015), Ont Sup Ct, CV-0011169-00CL (Initial Order) 16. Re First Leaside Wealth Management Inc, 2012 ONSC 1299 17. Re Grant Forest Products Inc, 2009 CarswellOnt 4699 (Sup Ct) 18. Re Lehndorff General Partner, 1993 CarswellOnt 183 (Sup Ct) 19. Re Nortel Networks Corp, 2009 CarswellOnt 1330 (Sup Ct) [Nortel Networks (KERP)] 20. Re Nortel Networks Corp, 2009 CarswellOnt 1519 (Sup Ct) [Nortel Networks (KEIP)] - 2 - 21. Re Nortel Networks Corp, 2009 CarswellOnt 4806 (Sup Ct) [Nortel Networks (ERISA Litigation)] 22. Re Performance Sports Group Ltd, 2016 ONSC 6800 23. Re Priszm Income Fund, 2011 ONSC 2061 24. Re Redstone Investment Corp, 2014 ONSC 2004 25. Re Smurfit-Stone Container Canada Inc, 2009 CarswellOnt 391 (Sup Ct) 26. Re Stelco Inc, 2004 CarswellOnt 1211 (Sup Ct), leave to appeal to CA refused, 2004 Carswell Ont 2936, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2004 Carswell 5200 27. Re T Eaton Co, 1997 CarswellOnt 1914 (Gen Div) 28. Re Tamerlane Ventures Inc, 2013 ONSC 5461 29. Re Target Canada Co, 2015 ONSC 303 30. Re Target Canada Co (January 15, 2015), Ont Sup Ct, CV-15-10832-00CL (Initial Order) 31. Re Urbancorp Toronto Management Inc, 2016 ONSC 3288 32. Re US Steel Canada Inc, 2014 ONSC 6145 33. Re US Steel Canada Inc, 2016 ONSC 4838 [US Steel (DIP Extension)] 34. Re Walter Energy Canada Holdings Inc, 2016 BCSC 107 35. Sun Indalex Finance, LLC v United Steelworkers, 2013 SCC 6 Tab 1 Campeau v. Olympia & York Developments Ltd., 1992 CarswellOnt 185 1992 CarswellOnt 185, [1992] O.J. No. 1946, 14 C.B.R. (3d) 303, 14 C.P.C. (3d) 339... 1992 CarswellOnt 185 Ontario Court of Justice (General Division) Campeau v. Olympia & York Developments Ltd. 1992 CarswellOnt 185, [1992] O.J. No. 1946, 14 C.B.R. (3d) 303, 14 C.P.C. (3d) 339, 35 A.C.W.S. (3d) 679, 3 W.D.C.P. (2d) 575 ROBERT CAMPEAU, ROBERT CAMPEAU INC., 75090 ONTARIO INC., and ROBERT CAMPEAU INVESTMENTS INC. v. OLYMPIA & YORK DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED, 857408 ONTARIO INC., and NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA R.A. Blair J. Judgment: September 21, 1992 Docket: Docs. 92-CQ-19675, B-125/92 Counsel: Stephen T. Goudge, Q.C. and Peter C. Wardle, for the plaintiffs. Peter F. C. Howard, for National Bank of Canada. Yoine Goldstein, for Olympia & York Development Limited and 857408 Ontario Inc. Subject: Corporate and Commercial; Insolvency; Civil Practice and Procedure Motion to lift stay under Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act; Motion for stay under Courts of Justice Act. R.A. Blair J: 1 These motions raise questions regarding the court's power to stay proceedings. Two competing interests are to be weighed in the balance, namely, a) the interests of a debtor which has been granted the protection of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, and the "breathing space" offered by a s. 11 stay in such proceedings, on the one hand, and, b) the interests of a unliquidated contingent claimant to pursue an action against that debtor and an arm's length third party, on the other hand. 2 At issue is whether the court should resort to an interplay between its specific power to grant a stay, under s. 11 of the C.C.A.A., and its general power to do so under the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43 in order to stay the action completely; or whether it should lift the s. 11 stay to allow the action to proceed; or whether it should exercise some combination of these powers. Background and Overview 3 This action was commenced on April 28, 1992, and the statement of claim was served before May 14, 1992, the date on which an order was made extending the protection of the C.C.A.A. to Olympia & York Developments Limited and a group of related companies ("Olympia & York", or "O & Y" or the "Olympia & York Group"). 4 The plaintiffs are Robert Campeau and three Campeau family corporations which, together with Mr. Campeau, held the control block of shares of Campeau Corporation. Mr. Campeau is the former chairman and CEO of Campeau Corporation, said to have been one of North America's largest real estate development companies, until its recent rather high profile demise. It is the fall of that empire which forms the subject matter of the lawsuit. Copyright © Thomson Reuters Canada Limited or its licensors (excluding individual court documents). All rights reserved. 1 Campeau v. Olympia & York Developments Ltd., 1992 CarswellOnt 185 1992 CarswellOnt 185, [1992] O.J. No. 1946, 14 C.B.R. (3d) 303, 14 C.P.C. (3d) 339... The Claim against the Olympia & York Defendants 5 The story begins, according to the statement of claim, in 1987, after Campeau Corporation had completed a successful leveraged buy-out of Allied Stores Corporation, a very large retailer based in the United States. Olympia & York had aided in funding the Allied takeover by purchasing half of Campeau Corporation's interest in the Scotia Plaza in Toronto and subsequently also purchasing 10 per cent of the shares of Campeau Corporation. By late 1987, it is alleged, the relationship between Mr. Campeau and Mr. Paul Reichmann (one of the principals of Olympia & York) had become very close, and an agreement had been made whereby Olympia & York was to provide significant financial support, together with the considerable expertise and the experience of its personnel, in connection with Campeau Corporation's subsequent bid for control of Federated Stores Inc. (a second major U.S. department store chain). The story ends, so it is said, in 1991 after Mr. Campeau had been removed as chairman and CEO of Campeau Corporation and that company, itself, had filed for protection under the C.C.A.A. (from which it has since emerged, bearing the new name of Camdev Corp.). 6 In the meantime, in September 1989, the Olympia & York defendants, through Mr. Paul Reichmann, had entered into a shareholders' agreement with the plaintiffs in which, it is further alleged, Olympia & York obliged itself to develop and implement expeditiously a viable restructuring plan for Campeau Corporation. The allegation that Olympia & York breached this obligation by failing to develop and implement such a plan, together with the further assertion that the O & Y defendants actually frustrated Mr. Campeau's efforts to restructure Campeau Corporation's Canadian real estate operation, lies at the heart of the Campeau action. The plaintiffs plead that as a result they have suffered very substantial damages, including the loss of the value of their shares in Campeau Corporation, the loss of the opportunity of completing a refinancing deal with the Edward DeBartolo Corporation, and the loss of the opportunity on Mr. Campeau's part to settle his personal obligations on terms which would have preserved his position as chairman and CEO and majority shareholder of Campeau Corporation. 7 Damages are claimed in the amount of $1 billion, for breach of contract or, alternatively, for breach of fiduciary duty. Punitive damages in the amount of $250 million are also sought. The Claim against National Bank of Canada 8 Similar damages, in the amount of $1 billion (but no punitive damages), are claimed against the defendant National Bank of Canada, as well. The causes of action against the bank are framed as breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and breach of the provisions of s. 17(1) of the Personal Property Security Act [R.S.O. 1990, c.