Political Turmoil in Mizoram

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Political Turmoil in Mizoram ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Political Turmoil in Mizoram Resolving the Hmar Question ROLUAHPUIA Vol. 50, Issue No. 31, 01 Aug, 2015 Roluahpuia ([email protected]) is a doctoral candidate at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Guwahati, Assam. The seemingly intractable Hmar question in Mizoram has erupted again with the resuming of violent clashes between HPC (D) and the state government. Sporadic violence is becoming the norm in the state with the latest being the killing of three policemen by the Hmar militant outfits. Rather than looking at the logic of the struggle, the state government prefers to reply to such dissent through the use of force. On 29 March 2015, the convoy of three members of legislative assembly (MLAs) of Mizoram was ambushed by suspected militants belonging to Hmar People’s Convention (Democratic) [HPC (D)] in which three policemen lost their lives. The ambush took place in the northern part of Mizoram bordering Manipur, mostly inhabited by the Hmar tribe. HPC (D) is reported to have active operations in this part of the state. It is here that several outfits are demanding for separate autonomous councils for the Hmar tribe within the state of Mizoram. In short, it is the imagined territorial homeland which the HPC (D) refers to as “Sinlung.” The death of three policemen has caused wide uproar and resentment from the people of Mizoram. The ruling Congress government sent out a strong message to the outfit without delay and has promised to take stringent moves to counter such violent acts. The chief minister of the state, Lalthanhawla, stated that the Mizoram government had accepted the challenge of the HPC (D) and would respond to it. Mizoram is one of the relatively peaceful states among the eight northeastern states. There has been sustained political stability after the Mizo National Front (MNF) gave up its armed struggle. However, recent political developments within the state of the kind highlighted above have now been a common occurrence in the state. The state government’s proposal to declare the northern part of the state as “Disturbed Areas” will exacerbate this violence. For the government, it is the HPC (D) who has compelled the state to adopt such exceptional measures. This proposal however needs serious re-thinking as conflict mismanagement will only further alienate the different ethnic groups in the state. The Background ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 The Hmar problem is definitely not a new problem in Mizoram. After the emergence of HPC in 1987, the quest for autonomy continues to simmer to this day. The Hmar political aspirations can be traced back to the 1950s when territorial integration of all Mizo inhabited areas was the common political slogan. Led by Mizo Union (MU), the Hmar, including other cognate tribes of Mizo inside and outside of present day Mizoram, demanded territorial integration. The aspiration received a fatal blow as the upgradation of Lushai Hills into autonomous district under Assam in 1952 did not include the areas outside of Lushai Hills. This caused bitter feelings among the Hmar in particular who had turned down the Regional Council offered by the then Chief Minister of Manipur, Shri P B Singh. During the same time, numerous organisations which were founded on tribal lines emerged—Hmar National Council (HNC) and Hmar Mongolian Federation (HMF) prominent ones among them. They wanted to carve out separate homelands for protection of Hmar distinct identity. However, such political aspirations were put at bay with the rise of the Mizo National Front (MNF) movement which again echoed the idea of territorial integration under a single Mizo state. The present demand extends to a separate Mizo nation-state which they put as “Greater Mizoram.” The Hmars were at the forefront of this movement. The scenario was quite different in the border areas of Manipur where the MNF was always looked with deep suspicion. There were cases of Hmar being recruited as village volunteer force (VVF) formed by the state government to counter-MNF movement. The 1986 settlement between the central government and MNF left out the Mizo by agreeing to statehood status for Mizo Hills[i]. The call for autonomy started with the formation of Hmar People Convention (hereafter HPC) in 1986. The Hmars demanded a separate Hmar homeland in the northern part of Mizoram. They demanded separate autonomous councils within Mizoram like the tribal groups of Lai, Mara and Chakma. This appeared in their memorandum which was submitted to the prime minister in 1987 which puts the Hmar as “subjected to all sorts of social, cultural and political discrimination and economic exploitation at the hands of the more advanced communities, and longed to be kept equal with their brethren—the Pawis, the Lakhers and the Chakmas in Mizoram (HPC Memorandum 1987).” The HPC after a year of its formation launched an armed struggle to achieve their political goals. The area labeled “Demand Area” comprised villages which the HPC claimed to be Hmar majority villages. After five years of persistent struggle, dialogue for solution was undertaken between the HPC and the Mizoram government. This dialogue went on till 1994 and it was on the 9th meeting that an agreement was signed between the representatives of both parties. Two important and salient features of the agreement included the plan to set up Sinlung Hill ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Development Council (SHDC) and to take measures to include Hmar inhabited areas and other non-scheduled area of Mizoram within the ambit of the sixth schedule. While SHDC came into being, the granting of sixth schedule gradually was largely forgotten. Disillusioned with the way in which government was fulfilling its promises, the HPC (D) took to arms again and parted ways from the HPC. It demanded the government to fulfill the agreement signed in 1994 by granting separate autonomous councils under sixth schedule. The HPC (D) since then has been associated with most acts of violence including the last ambush. Clash of Aspirations The HPC (D) in particular has been responsible for various attacks within Aizawl and other parts of Mizoram. They were reportedly involved in the bomb attacks of the police vehicle parked near the resident of the SHDC chairman, Hminghchungnung[ii]. Apart from this, the HPC (D) had issued diktats by issuing order against the functioning of Young Mizo Association (YMA) in their demand area. Apart from this, they boycotted village council elections causing the malfunctioning of democratic governance within their demand area. In the recently concluded village council elections too, due to the boycott by HPC (D), 26 villages within the demand area were barred from the election process. There has been tension previously against the HPC (D) order for the dissolution of the functioning of YMA in their areas. Such acts of HPC (D) has created unwanted rift between the larger Mizo society and the HPC (D). Rather than backing down, both the HPC (D) and the Mizoram government are preparing for more aggression. Way back in 2011, the home minister of the state clarified the standpoint of the government when he said that the “the Mizoram government would not support any demand of the creation of Autonomous District Council and other related demands; and the government does not have any will to give any Autonomous District Council in any constituency.” The HPC (D) on the other hand accused the Congress government, which was the party which signed the accord with HPC in 1994, of being reluctant in implementing the 1994 accord. It thereby remained firm to its demand of separate autonomous councils through the implementation of the 1994 accord. The bone of contention between the Mizoram government and HPC (D) lay in the question of granting autonomous councils or the upgradation of SHDC to a sixth schedule status. Apart from the Hmar, Mizoram is faced internally with the challenge of similar demands for autonomy by various tribal groups such as Paite and Bru. Those enjoying separate autonomous councils comprising of Lai, Mara and Chakma aspire for yet higher autonomy by demanding direct funding and Union Territory status. While there is a stalemate on such political aspirations, the past experience shows the vulnerability of the state towards incidents of violence which often erupt as a means to advance such demands. ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Question of Identity The current political tension also unlocked the question of identity in the state. This is partly because Mizo as a composite identity is still in the making. This is also due to the resistance of the process of “Mizoisation” by smaller cognate tribes such as Paite, Hmar, Lai and Mara in particular. Mizo identity is perceived to be Lushai centric and acceptance of Mizo is tantamount to accepting Lushai language and culture. However, the picture is rather complex as ethnic assimilation and resistance coexists when it comes to Mizoram. As a result of this, it is difficult to ascertain the question of identity and belonging as assimilation has been largely uneven in the state of Mizoram. Lal Dena (2002) notes this when he distinguished Hmar into two types. The first are the Hmar who are satisfied to consider themselves as Mizo who he further refers to as completely “Mizoised”. The second category comprises Hmars who are partially assimilated into Mizo and therefore are still urging to protect and preserve their distinct identity. They are mostly Hmars outside of Mizoram and it is from this group that the demand for maintaining of distinct identity and political aspirations emerge. To an extent, one could agree to the above observation. Prior to this, Goswami (1979) has observed that even within the state of Mizoram, there are two types of Hmar—the ones residing in north Mizoram who claim to be autochthones while those who live in the central region identify themselves as Mizo.
Recommended publications
  • Carrying Capacity Analysis in Mizoram Tourism
    Senhri Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1 (January - June 2019), p. 30-37 Senhri Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies ISSN: 2456-3757 Vol. 04, No. 01 A Journal of Pachhunga University College Jan.-June, 2019 (A Peer Reviewed Journal) Open Access https://senhrijournal.ac.in DOI: 10.36110/sjms.2019.04.01.004 CARRYING CAPACITY ANALYSIS IN MIZORAM TOURISM Ghanashyam Deka 1,* & Rintluanga Pachuau2 1Department of Geography, Pachhunga University College, Aizawl, Mizoram 2Department of Geography & Resource Management, Mizoram University, Aizawl, Mizoram *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Ghanashyam Deka: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5246-9682 ABSTRACT Tourism Carrying Capacity was defined by the World Tourism Organization as the highest number of visitors that may visit a tourist spot at the same time, without causing damage of the natural, economic, environmental, cultural environment and no decline in the class of visitors' happiness. Carrying capacity is a concept that has been extensively applied in tourism and leisure studies since the 1960s, but its appearance can be date back to the 1930s. It may be viewed as an important thought in the eventual emergence of sustainability discussion, it has become less important in recent years as sustainability and its associated concepts have come to dominate planning on the management of tourism and its impacts. But the study of carrying capacity analysis is still an important tool to know the potentiality and future impact in tourism sector. Thus, up to some extent carrying capacity analysis is important study for tourist destinations and states like Mizoram. Mizoram is a small and young state with few thousands of visitors that visit the state every year.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Intent for Lease of Cold Storages at Champhai and Vairengte, Mizoram
    LETTER OF INTENT FOR LEASE OF COLD STORAGES AT CHAMPHAI AND VAIRENGTE, MIZORAM NLUP IMPLEMENTING BOARD : MIZORAM; AIZAWL ……… 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE (For Lease of Cold Storages) SECTION-I Introduction: Development of Horticulture Sector and its produces is an integral part of NLUP Project highlighted in the Detailed Project Report (DPR) which has been approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) of the Government of India. Horticultural crops like Potato, Turmeric, Ginger, Squash, Passion fruit, Spices, M. Oranges, etc., are produced abundantly in the State every harvesting season. There is also a bright scope of market for these crops. The State Government through Agriculture Department and Horticulture Department, built up three Cold Storages at Champhai and Vairengte to preserve Horticultural Crops for further marketing. The State Government has now bestowed the responsibility of the Cold Storages to NLUP Implementing Board right from the implementation of the project till today. SECTION-II Methodology: NLUP Implementing Board, due to limited fund, lack of technical personnel and other infrastructural problems, decided to lease these Plants to capable Firm. According to this, the Firm selected to lease the Plants will debit an Annual Lease Fee to the Govt. of Mizoram during the last month of every financial year. For this, the Firm should know the context and their capacity to run the Cold Storages before making their bid. Specifically the job of the Firm, amongst others, would be as under: To collect harvest from the farmers in general and beneficiaries in particular. To motivate beneficiaries, farmers, etc and their level of confidence about the commitment of their Firm entrusted with lease programme.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mizoram Gazette EXTRA ORDINARY Published by Authority Regn
    The Mizoram Gazette EXTRA ORDINARY Published by Authority Regn. No. NE-313(MZ) 2006-2008 Rs. 2/- per issue VOL - XXXVIII Aizawl, Thursday 30.7.2009 Sravana 8, S.E. 1931, Issue No. 387 NOTIFICATION No. H. l3020/2/96 - PAD, the 12th June, 2009. In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to article 162 of the Constitution of India, the Governor of Mizoram is pleased to make the following rules, namely :- Short title and 1. (1) These rules may be called the Mizoram Ministers, Leader of the commencement Opposition and Parliamentary Secretaries (Discretionary Grant) Rules, 2009. (2) They shall come into force with effect from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette of Mizoram. Application 2. Save as otherwise provided in these rules, these rules shall apply to all Ministers, Leader of the Opposition and Parliamentary Secretaries of Mizoram. Definition 3. In these rules unless the context otherwise requires :- (1) “Competent Authority” means the officer declared as such under Rule 14 of Delegation of Financial Powers Rules, 1978 as adapted by the State Government of Mizoram, or under the relevant provisions of the General Financial Rules, 2005, as the case may be. (2) “Department” means the Secretariat Administration Department in the Government of Mizoram, or the Mizoram Legislative Assembly Secretariat, as the case may be for the purposes of these Rules. (3) “Drawing and Disbursing Officer” means a Head of Office or any other Gazetted Officer designated or declared as such by Head of Department in the Secretariat Administration Department of Government of Mizoram or in the Mizoram Legislative Assembly Secretariat, as the case may be, under Rule 14 of Delegation of Financial Powers Rules, 1978 or Rule 23 of General Financial Rules, 2005, as the case may be.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Structure of Mizo Village: a Participatory Rural Appraisal
    International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2019, 10(1):077-080 Research Article Doi: HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.23910/IJBSM/2019.10.1.1899 Social Science Social Structure of Mizo Village: a Participatory Rural Appraisal Lalhmunmawia and Samares Kumar Das* Dept. of Veterinary & Animal Husbandry Extension, College of Veterinary Sciences & Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram (796 015), India Corresponding Author Article History Samares Kumar Das Article ID: AR1899 e-mail: [email protected] Received in 14th September, 2018 Received in revised form 21st February, 2019 Accepted in final form 27th February, 2019 Abstract Mizoram in india, the land of Mizo, is the fifth smallest state in India with the highest tribal population. However, there is a dearth of in depth study on social structure of Mizo village. This calls for a better understanding of social structure for planning and implementation of location specific research and development programs. Keeping this in view, a field study was carried out in a purposively selected village named Muthi in Aizawl district of Mizoram to study the social structure through Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) to help R&D professionals to plan and implement location specific development programs. Case study was done following the principles and methods of PRA. Data collected through PRA were analyzed and reported through the principles and methods of PRA. Established in 1910, Muthi was a village with three localities. Supply and services included road, path, stair steps, spring, cemetery, community hall, shop, post office, playing ground, and a number of institutions and organisations.Among institutions in the village, Church and Young Mizo Association were most important.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Conflicts & Resolution in India's Northeast
    Survey of Conflicts & Resolution in India’s Northeast? Ajai Sahni? India’s Northeast is the location of the earliest and longest lasting insurgency in the country, in Nagaland, where separatist violence commenced in 1952, as well as of a multiplicity of more recent conflicts that have proliferated, especially since the late 1970s. Every State in the region is currently affected by insurgent and terrorist violence,1 and four of these – Assam, Manipur, Nagaland and Tripura – witness scales of conflict that can be categorised as low intensity wars, defined as conflicts in which fatalities are over 100 but less than 1000 per annum. While there ? This Survey is based on research carried out under the Institute’s project on “Planning for Development and Security in India’s Northeast”, supported by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). It draws on a variety of sources, including Institute for Conflict Management – South Asia Terrorism Portal data and analysis, and specific State Reports from Wasbir Hussain (Assam); Pradeep Phanjoubam (Manipur) and Sekhar Datta (Tripura). ? Dr. Ajai Sahni is Executive Director, Institute for Conflict Management (ICM) and Executive Editor, Faultlines: Writings on Conflict and Resolution. 1 Within the context of conflicts in the Northeast, it is not useful to narrowly define ‘insurgency’ or ‘terrorism’, as anti-state groups in the region mix in a wide range of patterns of violence that target both the state’s agencies as well as civilians. Such violence, moreover, meshes indistinguishably with a wide range of purely criminal actions, including drug-running and abduction on an organised scale. Both the terms – terrorism and insurgency – are, consequently, used in this paper, as neither is sufficient or accurate on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Displaced Brus from Mizoram in Tripura: Time for Resolution
    Displaced Brus from Mizoramin Tripura: Time for Resolution Brig SK Sharma Page 2 of 22 About The Author . Brigadier Sushil Kumar Sharma, YSM, PhD, commanded a Brigade in Manipur and served as the Deputy General Officer Commanding of a Mountain Division in Assam. He has served in two United Nation Mission assignments, besides attending two security related courses in the USA and Russia. He earned his Ph.D based on for his deep study on the North-East India. He is presently posted as Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force in Manipur. http://www.vifindia.org ©Vivekananda International Foundation Page 3 of 22 Displaced Brus from Mizoram in Tripura: Time for Resolution Abstract History has been witness to the conflict-induced internal displacement of people in different states of Northeast India from time to time. While the issues of such displacement have been resolved in most of the North-eastern States, the displacement of Brus from Mizoram has remained unresolved even over past two decades. Over 35,000 Brus have been living in six makeshift relief camps in North Tripura's Kanchanpur, areas adjoining Mizoram under inhuman conditions since October 1997. They had to flee from their homes due to ethnic violence in Mizoram. Ever since, they have been confined to their relief camps living on rations doled out by the state, without proper education and health facilities. Called Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), some of the young Brus from these camps have joined militant outfits out of desperation. There have been several rounds of talks among the stakeholders without any conclusive and time-bound resolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The State and Identities in NE India
    1 Working Paper no.79 EXPLAINING MANIPUR’S BREAKDOWN AND MANIPUR’S PEACE: THE STATE AND IDENTITIES IN NORTH EAST INDIA M. Sajjad Hassan Development Studies Institute, LSE February 2006 Copyright © M.Sajjad Hassan, 2006 Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in this Working Paper, the Development Research Centre and LSE accept no responsibility for the veracity of claims or accuracy of information provided by contributors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing of the publisher nor be issued to the public or circulated in any form other than that in which it is published. Requests for permission to reproduce this Working Paper, of any part thereof, should be sent to: The Editor, Crisis States Programme, Development Research Centre, DESTIN, LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE. 1 Crisis States Programme Explaining Manipur’s Breakdown and Mizoram’s Peace: the State and Identities in North East India M.Sajjad Hassan Development Studies Institute, LSE Abstract Material from North East India provides clues to explain both state breakdown as well as its avoidance. They point to the particular historical trajectory of interaction of state-making leaders and other social forces, and the divergent authority structure that took shape, as underpinning this difference. In Manipur, where social forces retained their authority, the state’s autonomy was compromised. This affected its capacity, including that to resolve group conflicts. Here powerful social forces politicized their narrow identities to capture state power, leading to competitive mobilisation and conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic History and Identity of the Zo Tribes in North East India
    Journal of North East India Studies Vol. 5(1), Jan.-Jun. 2015, pp. 39-50. Ethnic History and Identity of the Zo Tribes in North East India H. Thangtungnung North East India is a hotspot of identity crisis and ethnic divisions. The Chin, Kuki, Zomi and Mizo tribes who are collectively known as Zo people are no exception. They have close cultural, lingual and religious affinities and a com- mon ancestor called Zo. Historically, they have different theories of origin and migration based on their folklores, folktales and songs narrated down from one generation to another. The different origin theories like the Khul/Chhinlung or Cave origin theory, Chin Hills origin theory and Lost tribe (Manmasi) theory are among the most significant theories so far which speak, to some extent, some- thing about their history and origin. Of late, the Lost Tribe theory has gained momentum which claims that the Zo tribes are among the ten lost tribes of Israel, particularly from the tribe of Manasseh. Israeli Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar had recognised them as descendents of Israel in 2005, which was also approved by the Israeli government. Many have consequently immigrated to the ‘Holy Land’. In this backdrop, this paper is attempts to critically analyse and assess the ethnic origin of the Zo people with special reference to the lost tribe theory. Based on cultural and oral traditions, and Biblical sources, it also attempts to support that the Zo people are the ten lost tribe of Israel by substantiating various arguments to validate this origin theory. Keywords: Zo, Khul origin theory, Chin Hills theory, Lost tribe, Manmasi Introduction The Zo people are indigenous tribes of Manipur and Mizoram in Northeast India, Bangladesh and Chin State of Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Breakdown in North East India: Explorations in State-Society Relations
    Working Paper Series ISSN 1470-2320 2007 No.07-83 Understanding the breakdown in North East India: Explorations in state-society relations M. Sajjad Hassan Published: May 2007 Development Studies Institute London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street Tel: +44 (020) 7955 7425/6252 London Fax: +44 (020) 7955-6844 WC2A 2AE UK Email: [email protected] Web site: www.lse.ac.uk/depts/destin 1 Understanding the breakdown in North East India: Explorations in state-society relations M. Sajjad Hassan DESTIN, London School of Economics 1. Introduction Northeastern India – a compact region made up of seven sub-national states1- has historically seen high levels of violence, stemming mostly from ethnic and separatist conflicts. It was among the first of the regions, to demonstrate, on the attainment of Independence, signs of severe political crisis in the form of nationalist movements. This has translated into a string of armed separatist movements and inter-group ethnic conflicts that have become the enduring feature of its politics. Separatist rebellions broke out first in Naga Hills district of erstwhile Assam State, to be followed by similar armed movement in the Lushai Hills district of that State. Soon secessionism overtook Assam proper and in Tripura and Manipur. Of late Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh have joined the list of States that are characterised as unstable and violent. Despite the attempts of both the state and society, many of these violent movements have continued to this day with serious implications for the welfare of citizens (Table 1). Besides separatist violence, inter-group ethnic clashes have been frequent and have taken a heavy toll of life and property.2 Ethnic violence exists alongside inter-ethnic contestations, over resources and opportunities, in which the state finds itself pulled in different directions, with little ability to provide solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 2 NO.A.11013/12/2019-GAD
    NO.A.11013/12/2019-GAD GOVERNMENT OF MIZORAM GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT ***** N O T I F I C A T I O N Dated Aizawl, the 4th July, 2019 In the interest of public service, the Competent Authority is pleased to order creation and transfer of various categories of posts for the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Saitual District as shown below:- No of posts Total Sl. Pay Name of Post newly Remarks No. of No. Level created Posts 1 Deputy Commissioner 13 1 1 2 Addl. Deputy Commissioner 12 1 1 3 Election Officer 11 1 1 4 Sub-Deputy Commissioner 10 2 2 5 Superintendent 10 1 1 Existing 1 (one) post of Assistant in o/o SDO(C), Saitual and re-designated vide 6 Assistant 7 2 No.A.11013/1/08- 3 PAR(SSW) dt.12.08.2009 shall be retained by D.C. Saitual. 7 Steno-II 7 1 1 5 (five) out of 23 (twenty three) vacant posts of UDC upgraded vide 8 UDC 6 - No.A.11011/13/89- 5 GAD Dt.22.07.1991 under D.C. Aizawl shall be transferred to D.C. Saitual 7 (seven) out of 18 (eighteen) vacant posts of LDC created vide 9 LDC 4 - No.ABM.27/65/37 7 Dt.09.02.1967 under D.C. Aizawl shall be transferred to D.C. Saitual. 10 Driver 2 5 5 11 Despatch Rider 2 1 1 20 (twenty) vacant posts of Peon created vide No.GAD.44/72/11 12 Group ‘D’ 1 - 20 Dt.25.11.1972 under D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mizoram Gazette Wuf,Cisftea
    " • �'lJ1I"it The Mizoram Gazette EXTRAORDINARY Wuf,Cisftea [,y Authority Regn. No. NE-313(MZ) VOL - XXXII Aizawl, Saturday 6.12.2003 Agrahayana 15, S.B. 1925, Issue No. 370 ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi -110 001. Dated: the 6th December, 2003 t • 15 Agrahayana,1925 (Saka) NOTIFICATION No. 30S/MIZ-LN2003 :- Whereas, in pursuance of Notification No.H. 11018/2/2003-CEO, issued by the Governor of Mizoram on 27th October, 2003 under sub-section (2) of Section 15 of the Representationof the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951), a General Election has been held for the purpose of constitutinga new Legislative Assembly for theState ofMizoram; and Whereas, the results of theelections inall Assembly Constituencies in the said General Election have been declaredby the Returning Officers concernedexcept in20- Suangpuilawn(S T) Assembly Contituency, where counting of votes has not been completed. Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 73 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951), the Election Commission ofIndia hereby notifies the names of the Members elected for those constituencies,along withtheir party affiliation, if any, inthe SCHEDULEto this Notification. By order, K. AJAYA KUMAR SECRETARY ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Ex--370/2003 - 2 - SCHEDULE TO NOTIFICATION NO. 3081MIZ-LAl2003 DATED �. 6TH DECEMBER,2003 OF ELECTION COMMisSION OF INDIA • Name of the State: Mizoram S1. No. and Name of Name of theElected PartyAffiliation (if any) Assembly Constituency Member l. Tuipang(ST) P.P.Thawla Maraland Democratic Front Indian 2. Saiha(ST) S. Hiato National Congress 3. Sangau(ST) H.Rammawi MIZO National Front 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Further Discussion on the Mizoram University (Amendment) Bill, 2007
    > Title: Further Discussion on the Mizoram University (Amendment) Bill, 2007. THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (SHRIMATI D. PURANDESWARI): Sir, on behalf of Shri Arjun Singh, I beg to move: "That the Bill to amend the Mizoram University Act, 2000, as passed by Rajya Sabha, be taken into consideration." MR. SPEAKER: Motion moved: "That the Bill to amend the Mizoram University Act, 2000, as passed by Rajya Sabha, be taken into consideration." SHRI TAPIR GAO (ARUNACHAL EAST): Hon. Speaker, Sir, I rise to support the Mizoram University (Amendment) Bill, 2007. On behalf of the people of the North-East, I would like to thank and congratulate the hon. Ministers who have taken pain to bring this Bill for amendment. 13.38 hrs. (Shri Mohan Singh in the Chair) Mr. Chairman, Sir, the Mizoram University Act was passed in 2000 and the University was established on 2 nd July, 2000 itself. People of Mizoram are in need of a University with good infrastructure. Not just Mizoram, the entire North-East is in need of such universities. The UPA Government has created Central Universities in many North-Eastern States. We need good infrastructure for better education to our children. In this Mizoram University, 26 colleges have been affiliated and 7,000 students are studying there. Under Post-Graduation, 1,840 students are there. But out of 39 Departments in the University, only 27 Departments are in existence.[MSOffice14] Therefore, I would like to urge upon the hon. Minister and the Government to establish al the 39 requisite UGC departments in the Mizoram University.
    [Show full text]