Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table of Contents PLUMAS COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Adopted December 17, 2013 Cover Photo Credits Lake Almanor with Mt. Lassen by Jan Davies Graeagle Mill Pond by Michael K. Clawson Osprey with fish by William Osborn Indian Valley cattle with Mt. Hough and North Fork Feather River with rafters by Tracey Ferguson Sierra Valley barn with Sugarloaf Peak by Rebecca Herrin Keddie Wye with train by Christoph Kadel Town of Quincy by Mike Nellor Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 Overview & Setting ...................................................................................................... 1 History ......................................................................................................................... 2 Vision & Planning Goals .............................................................................................. 7 Purpose and Scope ..................................................................................................... 9 Legal Basis and Requirements .................................................................................... 9 General Plan Elements .............................................................................................. 10 Climate Change and the General Plan ...................................................................... 14 The Update Process .................................................................................................. 16 LAND USE ELEMENT (1) ............................................................................................. 20 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 24 Setting / Existing Condition ........................................................................................ 20 Values and Issues ..................................................................................................... 21 Legal Basis and Requirements .................................................................................. 22 Relationship to the Other Plan Elements ................................................................... 23 Planning Area Diagrams ............................................................................................ 24 Plans and Planning .................................................................................................... 35 Goals ......................................................................................................................... 35 HOUSING ELEMENT (2) .............................................................................................. 64 NOISE ELEMENT (3) .................................................................................................... 65 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 65 Setting / Existing Condition ........................................................................................ 65 Values and Issues ..................................................................................................... 77 Legal Basis ................................................................................................................ 77 Relationship to the Other Elements ........................................................................... 77 Goals ......................................................................................................................... 78 CIRCULATION ELEMENT (4) ....................................................................................... 83 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 83 Setting / Existing Condition ........................................................................................ 83 Values and Issues ..................................................................................................... 84 Legal Basis and Requirements .................................................................................. 85 Relationship to the Other Plan Elements ................................................................... 85 Plans and Planning .................................................................................................... 86 Goals ......................................................................................................................... 86 Table of Contents| i ECONOMICS ELEMENT (5) ......................................................................................... 95 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 95 Setting / Existing Condition ........................................................................................ 95 Projections ............................................................................................................... 100 Legal Basis and Requirements ................................................................................ 101 Relationship to the Other Plan Elements ................................................................. 101 Values and Issues ................................................................................................... 101 PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY ELEMENT (6) ............................................................... 129 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 129 Setting / Existing Condition ...................................................................................... 129 Legal Basis and Relationship to Other General Plan Elements ............................... 136 Values and Issues ................................................................................................... 136 Plans and Planning .................................................................................................. 137 Goals ....................................................................................................................... 137 CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT (7) ................................................ 153 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 153 Setting / Existing Condition ...................................................................................... 153 Relationship to Other Elements ............................................................................... 159 Plans and Planning .................................................................................................. 160 Goals ....................................................................................................................... 160 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY ELEMENT (8) ...................................................... 185 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 185 Setting / Existing Condition ...................................................................................... 185 Values and Issues ................................................................................................... 187 Legal Basis and Requirements ................................................................................ 187 Relationship to the Other Elements ......................................................................... 188 Plans and Planning .................................................................................................. 188 Goals ....................................................................................................................... 189 WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT (9) ........................................................................ 209 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 209 Setting / Existing Condition ...................................................................................... 209 Relationship to the Other Elements ......................................................................... 212 Plans and Planning .................................................................................................. 212 Goals ....................................................................................................................... 212 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 230 Table of Contents| ii Element Implementation Measures Land Use Element Implementation Measures ............................................................... 57 Noise Element Implementation Measures ..................................................................... 81 Circulation Element Implementation Measures ............................................................. 93 Economics Element Implementation Measures .......................................................... 117 Public Health and Safety Element Implementation Measures ..................................... 148 Conservation and Open Space Element Implementation Measures ........................... 179 Agriculture and Forestry Element Implementation Measures ...................................... 200 Water Resources Element Implementation Measures ...............................................
Recommended publications
  • About Plumas County
    ABOUT PLUMAS COUNTY The area we presently call Plumas County (and lands adjoining it) was originally the home of the Maidu Indian tribe. The region’s abundant supply of game, fish, berries and seeds provided subsistence for these indigenous residents for several thousand years prior to the western migration of settlers. In 1821 Spanish explorer Luis Arguello arrived along the lower portion of the region’s main watershed (probably near it’s confluence with the Sacramento River). Arguello is credited with naming the river El Rio de las Plumas (The Feather River) after seeing what he thought were feathers floating in the water. Historians believe, however, that Arguello did not ever set foot in what is now Plumas County. In the 1850’s rumors of a fabled “Gold Lake” in the northeastern Sierras began circulating among the miners who had poured into California following the discovery of gold at Sutter’s mill. The upper reaches of the Feather River watershed were soon swarmed over by gold seekers who quickly displaced native Maidu residents in their quest for riches. Along with the miners came other settlers including a large Chinese population that remained in the region until the early 1900s. One of the early gold seekers, James Beckwourth, discovered the lowest pass through the Sierras (north of Reno, Nevada) at a point that now bears the name, Beckwourth Pass. The pass was opened to wagon travel via a toll road in 1851. More hospitable (due to its lower elevation) than the infamous Donner Pass, it made westward travel for new settlers safer and easier.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Winter " Railroading HALF a WORLD
    April 1986 No. 269 Western Winter " Railroading HALF A WORLD ... HALF A CENTURY Pennsylvania's anthracite coal country and Mainland China have little in common ... and a lot.Yesterday lived the third-rail Lackawanna & Wyoming Valley Railroad- a remarkable Keystone State interurban. Today, China is building new railroads, emphasizing both electrification and new steam power. Now, Interurban Press and Trans-Anglo Books take you trackside to see how it was, is-and will be. THE LAUREL LINE was an interurban with a difference. It was at once an electrified, heavy-duty coal-hauling railroad and an important passenger carrier linking Scranton and Wilkes-Barre. It lasted well into the 1950s, but was seldom prosperous. It never modernized, but its heavy cars were classics. Its management was reactionary but resourceful, and its passengers complained-but stayed loyal almost to the end. Authors Muncie and Henwood really did their homework on the L&WV, and the result is a definitive history, rich in the telling and complete to the last detail. And there's a wealth of rare photos spanning the Laurel Line's entire history from construction to dismemberment. THE LAUREL LINE-An Anthracite Region Railway By JAMES N.J. HENWOOD and JOHN G. MUNCIE 208 pages, 247 illus., maps, rosters, 8'hx11" hardbound with color jacket painting. ISBN 0-916374-72-6. (Special 103) . ...... $34.95 IShipping S1.50; Californians please add 6% sales lax) MAINLAND CHINA .. so far and yet so near. Her railways are surprisingly like ours; her ubiquitous ribbed-metal passenger cars could have come right off the Milwaukee Road! Forbidden no longer, China offers the 1986 railfan a dazzling choice of steam, electrics, U.s.-built diesels, old and new trackage and scenery spectaculars beyond imagining.
    [Show full text]
  • George E. Tillitson Collection on Railroads M0165
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf1j49n53k No online items Guide to the George E. Tillitson Collection on Railroads M0165 Department of Special Collections and University Archives 1999 ; revised 2019 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the George E. Tillitson M0165 1 Collection on Railroads M0165 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: George E. Tillitson collection on railroads creator: Tillitson, George E. Identifier/Call Number: M0165 Physical Description: 50.5 Linear Feet(9 cartons and 99 manuscript storage boxes) Date (inclusive): 1880-1959 Abstract: Notes on the history of railroads in the United States and Canada. Conditions Governing Access The collection is open for research. Note that material is stored off-site and must be requested at least 36 hours in advance of intended use. Provenance Gift of George E. Tillitson, 1955. Special Notes One very useful feature of the material is further described in the two attached pages. This is the carefully annotated study of a good many of the important large railroads of the United States complete within their own files, these to be found within the official state of incorporation. Here will be included page references to the frequently huge number of small short-line roads that usually wound up by being “taken in” to the larger and expending Class II and I roads. Some of these files, such as the New York Central or the Pennsylvania Railroad are very big themselves. Michigan, Wisconsin, Oregon, and Washington are large because the many lumber railroads have been extensively studied out.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition in the Railroad Industry
    BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD _______________________ Ex Parte No. 705 _______________________ COMPETITION IN THE RAILROAD INDUSTRY _______________________ COMMENTS OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY J. MICHAEL HEMMER LOUISE A. RINN GAYLA L. THAL Union Pacific Railroad Company 1400 Douglas Street Omaha, Nebraska 68179 (402) 544-3309 MICHAEL L. ROSENTHAL CAROLYN F. CORWIN Covington & Burling LLP 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 662-6000 Attorneys for Union Pacific Railroad Company April 12, 2011 Contains Color Images 1 BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD _______________________ Ex Parte No. 705 _______________________ COMPETITION IN THE RAILROAD INDUSTRY _______________________ COMMENTS OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY Union Pacific Railroad Company offers these comments in response to the Surface Transportation Board’s Notice served January 11, 2011, in this proceeding.1 Union Pacific urges readers to review the accompanying verified statements of James R. Young, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Union Pacific Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company, and Lance M. Fritz, Executive Vice President - Operations for Union Pacific Railroad Company. Union Pacific also endorses the comments submitted by the Association of American Railroads. Part I of these comments introduces the critical issues raised by the prospect of regulatory change that would give shippers control over access to Union Pacific’s assets and the ability to override Union Pacific’s transportation plans. Part II summarizes the testimony of Union Pacific’s witnesses, who describe (a) how the Staggers Act and the regulatory policies that followed produced increased investment and higher levels of service for shippers, and (b) how changing the Board’s competition policies would undermine those accomplishments, reducing 1 In a decision served February 4, 2011, the Board extended the procedural schedule established by the Notice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pikes Peak Ocean to Ocean Highway the Appian Way of America
    THE PIKES PEAK OCEAN TO OCEAN HIGHWAY THE APPIAN WAY OF AMERICA By Richard F. Weingroff This is the story of a highway that couldn’t make up its mind --the Pikes Peak Ocean to Ocean Highway (PPOO), one of the early transcontinental highways of the named trail era (about 1910- 1926). Starting a Highway Formal organization of the Pikes Peak Ocean to Ocean Highway Association was completed on March 18, 1914, at a meeting in St. Joseph, Missouri. The association was dedicated to promoting improvement and use of a road from New York City to San Francisco. An account of the founding appeared in the May 1914 issue of Better Roads and Streets: “The Pike’s Peak Ocean to Ocean Highway” is the latest development in the transcontinental route situation. The new highway was launched at a meeting in St. Joseph, Mo., on March 18, by the federation and alliance of State and interstate associations already in existence. The course of the Pike’s Peak Ocean to Ocean Highway is from New York through Philadelphia, Washington, Baltimore, Cumberland, Wheeling, Columbus, Dayton, Indianapolis, Springfield, Ill., Hannibal, Mo., St. Joseph, Belleville, Kans., Colorado Springs, Glenwood Springs, Salt Lake City, Reno, Sacramento and Oakland to San Francisco. The affiliating organizations are: The Springfield-Hannibal Highway Association, through Illinois. The Hannibal-St. Joseph Cross State Highway Association, through Missouri. The Rock Island Highway Association, through Kansas. The Lincoln Highway Association through Colora do. The Utah Division of the Pike’s Peak Ocean to Ocean Highway Association. East of Illinois, a co-operative arrangement has been made with the National Old Trails Association to Washington and New York.
    [Show full text]
  • COM/MF1/Avs/Sbf Order Instituting Investigation for The
    COM/MF1/avs/sbf Date of Issuance 7/3/2013 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Investigation for the purpose of establishing a list for the fiscal years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 of existing FILED crossings at grade of city streets, county PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION roads or state highways in need of JUNE 27, 2013 separation, or existing separations in need SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE of alterations or reconstruction in INVESTIGATION 13-06-014 accordance with Section 2452 of the California Streets and Highways Code. ORDER INSTITUTING INVESTIGATION Summary This Order Instituting Investigation (OII) is for the purpose of establishing the Grade Separation Priority List for the fiscal years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. The OII requests project nominations from interested parties for existing crossings at grade of city streets, county roads, or state highways in need of grade separation, or existing grade separations in need of alterations or reconstruction in accordance with Section 2452 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Completed nomination applications must be filed by October 25, 2013. Nomination forms and instructions are contained in this OII and are available on-line at the California Public Utilities Commission’s website at: http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/safety/Rail/Crossings/funding.htm. Background Section 2452 of the California Streets and Highways (S&H) Code requires the California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) to establish the Grade Separation Program Priority List (Priority List) for projects and furnish it to the 70299839 - 1 - I.13-06-014 COM/MF1/avs/sbf California Transportation Commission (CTC) by July 1st of each year for use in the fiscal year (FY) beginning on that date.
    [Show full text]
  • Rulemaking: 2004-11-18 Appendixb Harborcraft and Locomotive
    APPENDIX B CALIFORNIA'S RAILROADS WITH INTRASTATE LOCOMOTIVES Lists of California's Class I, Passenger Train, and Class III Railroads With Intrastate Locomotives CALIFORNIA'S RAILROADS WITH INTRASTATE LOCOMOTIVES CALIFORNIA'S CLASS I FREIGHT RAILROADS : · Union Pacific Railroad (UP) · Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) CALIFORNIA'S INTRASTATE PASSENGER TRAIN OPERATIONS: COMPANY NAME ROUTE NAME OPERATION LOCATION(S) Southern California Regional Rail Authority Metrolink Los Angeles Area San Mateo County Transit District CalTrain Gilroy-San Jose-San Francisco Amtrak Pacific Surfliner Oceanside-Los Angeles-Oxnard CalTrans-Amtrak San Joaquin Bakersfield-Martinez or Sacramento CalTrans-Amtrak Capitol Corridor Auburn-Sacramento-San Jose North County Transit District Coaster San Diego-Oceanside San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Altamont Commuter Express Stockton-San Jose CLASS III RAILROADS: INTRASTATE SHORT HAUL OPERATIONS COMPANY NAME OPERATION LOCATION(S) IN CALIFORNIA Almanor Railroad Chester-Clear Creek Junction California Northern Railroad Napa-Woodland-Tehama and Tracy-Los Banos McCloud Railway McCloud Napa Valley Railroad Napa-St. Helena Santa Cruz Big Trees Santa Cruz-Roaring Camp San Diego and Imperial Valley Railroad San Diego-San Ysidro Santa Maria Valley Railroad Santa Maria-Guadalupe Northern Sierra Railway Oakdale-Standard, West Sac to Clarksburg/Woodland, McClellan Park, and Ft. Bragg-Willits, California San Joaquin Valley Railroad Fresno-Bakersfield Sierra Pacific Industries Quincy-Susanville Trona Railway Trona-Searles Ventura County Railroad Oxnard-Port Hueneme Yreka Western Railroad Yreka-Montague CLASS III RAILROADS: SWITCHER-TERMINAL OPERATIONS COMPANY NAME OPERATION LOCATION(S) IN CALIFORNIA Central California Traction Stockton-Lodi Los Angeles Junction Railway Company Los Angeles Modesto and Empire Traction Modesto Oakland Terminal Railway Oakland Pacific Harbor Lines Los Angeles-Long Beach Harbors Parr Terminal-Richmond Pacific Railroad Richmond Stockton Terminal & Eastern Railroad Stockton-Lodi.
    [Show full text]
  • Be Rail Each Direction Per Day-The PV South and Through to Fort Nelson and the M420s Will VP North
    'OJ Scale Power Amtrak AMTRAK "F40PH" Phase /I Nos. 230-328 OMI #0430.2 Features factory paint and lettering appli ed with head li ghts and Kadee couplers installed. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE "5040-2" Nos. 5020-5027 with 116-lnch "Snoot" Nose (Left) OMI #0500 ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE "5040-2" Nos. 5028-5172 with 81-lnch "Snoot" Nose (Right) OMI #0501 NORFOLK & WESTERN "5040-2" High Hood Version Nos. 1625-1639 (Left) OMI #0509 NORFOLK & WESTERN "5040-2" Low Hood Version Nos. 6189-6207 (Center) OMI #0510 SOUTHERN "5040-2" High Hood Version Nos. 3250-3328 (Right) OMI #0512 All of these fine are handcrafted in brass by Ajin Precision of Korea in 0 scale with a 26-inch minimum operating radius. Photos by Mardan Photography. PACIFIC RAIL Fro m the H ear t I and tot h ePa c i fie NEWS PACIFIC RA/lNEWS and PACIFIC N EWS are regis­ tered trademarks of Interurban Press, a California Corporation, PUBLISHER: Mac Sebree Uncle Pete's Feather River GP35s EDITOR: Don Gulbrandsen ART DIRECTOR: Mark Danneman These ex-WP units are the last GP35s on Union Pacific's roster ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Mike Schafer EDITORIAL ASSISTANT: Michael E, Folk 18 Ken RaHenne CONTRIBUTING EDITOR: Elrond Law rence EDITORIAL CONSULTANT: Dick Stephenson CONTRIBUTING ARTIST: John Signor PRODUCTION MANAGER: Ray Geyer CIRCULATION MANAGER: Bob Schneider BN's Mississippi River Route RAILROAD COLUMNISTS Busy action and great scenery along BN's Lakes Division-3rd Sub AMTRAK/PASSENGER-Dick Stephenson 655 Canyon Dr .. Glendale, CA 91206 Courtland Sears AT&SF-Elrond G, Lawrence 24 908 w.
    [Show full text]
  • The Train Sheet
    u The Train, Sheet OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEATHER RIVER RAIL SOCIETY PORTOLA CALIFORNIA VOLUME No.4 No.2 MARCH APRIL 1986 ISSUE No. 18 Feather River Rail Society Preserving "The Feather River Route" (j!WPLIVES The FRRS, a tax exempt public benefit California Corporation, BOARD OF DIRECTORS is the flISTORICAL SOCIETY ' for President and Founder Norman Holmes ( , the WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD 1st Vice President Jim Boynton and operates the PORTOLA RAIL- 2nd Vice President John Ryczkowski ROAD MUSEUM in Portola, Calif. 3rd Vice President Chris Skow Formed in February, 1983 with the purpose of secretary John Marvin preserving railroad history in general arid DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS Western Pacific Railroad history in particular. Treasurer Bill Magazin The WP LIVES in Portola for the benefit of the Membership Charlene Marvin friends of the late great FEATHER RIVER ROUTE. Sales Chris Skow ************ Grounds Hap Manit Single membership dues are $15.00 per Calendar Facilities Jim Ley Year. Our mailing address is Curator Steve Milward FRRS, POST OFFICE BOX #8, PORTOLA, CALIF. 96122 Track Norm Holmes ************ Diesel Dave McClain Our information phone number is 916-832-4131 Steam Jim Boynton ************ Cars John Ryczkowski "THE TRAIN SHEET" is Edited and laid out by Signal Jim Atkins John Ryczkowski, anyone wishing to send in Training John Ryczkowski articles/info please write; THE TRAIN SHEET FRRS LIFE MEMBERSHIP HONOR ROLL ............. Post Office Box 1663, Sparks, Nevada 89432 1. R.G. Flannery, 1986 ************ 2. Robert Dobbins, 1986 Issue Number 18, 700 printed ............ 3. Dave McClain, 1986 FROM THE PRESIDENT'S DESK MUSEUM CALENDAR FOR 1986 April 26th will mark the opening of our operating , April 19 Work day 6 Social Meeting season with a special day for two groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Wp's Centennial
    ISSUE 152 - Apr - Jun 2010 The Train Sheet WP’S CENTENNIAL A “gold spike” ceremony would be held on the - Norman Holmes, Director Keddie Wye trestle November 1, 2009 to mark the exact date of the driving of the last spike Western Pacific’s celebration of the completion which marked the completion of the last of the railroad was November 1, 1909. A small transcontinental railroad. Locomotives from the group of workers and townspeople attended UP, BNSF and WP would be in attendance. the event that was held on the Spanish Creek bridge near the town of Keddie. An iron spike Proposed facility improvements included was driven in a pine tie and the work went on. reassembly of Magnolia Tower, completion of This was no lavish event like the joining of the walkways around the Diesel Shop, a track rails at Promontory, Utah in 1869, however the extension to Old Town Portola, new signage, completion of the Western Pacific was very new rest rooms, additional storage tracks and a important since this upstart railroad broke the WP employee memorial grove with plaque. To monopoly held by the Central Pacific. fund the celebration, a major fundraising effort was to begin targeting major businesses that As the Preservation Organization for the had strong ties to the WP. A higher level of Western Pacific, the Feather River Rail Society engagement with government representatives had great plans to celebrate this important and agencies was recommended. event. As early as February 2006, plans were being made for a major celebration. This was Had these plans come to pass, a grand not only for Western Pacific’s centennial, but for celebration could have been held.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trainmaster
    The Trainmaster The Official Publication of the Pacific Northwest Chapter of the February 2015 National Railway Historical Society Portland, Oregon ISSUE No 631 www.pnwc-nrhs.org THE 1939 BIRTH OF A SHOP GOAT FOR BROOKLYN By Martin E. Hansen Brooklyn Shops No. 208 (Martin E. Hansen Collection) When Southern Pacific would wear out one of its shop goats stationed at one of the SP roundhouse facilities on its system, the call would go out to Sacramento for a “new” one. Such was the case in 1939 when the shop goat in service at the Brooklyn Shops in Portland, Oregon was in need of a replacement. The Brooklyn Shops had been using SPMW No. 566 a 0-6-0T originally built in 1882 as a 2-6-2T and converted to a shop goat in 1917. All the Sacramento Shop forces had to do was to go out to the rip track and pick out an old 0-6-0 that had enough boiler and running gear life left in her to make her worthy of the conversion. In this case SP No. 1079 was chosen as the “donor” for this conversion. By August 15, 1939 the conversion was completed and, as we see in the picture, SPMW No. 208 was born! This photo shows her at Sacramento just as she is being readied for her trip up north to Portland. Her tender has been discarded and a new set of saddle tanks has been created to hold water in the front and oil in the rear. This, February 2015 Pacific Northwest Chapter National Railway Historical Society The Trainmaster Page 1 together with the new short cab, left the engine with great visibility for the crews when backing to couple onto engines that were being shuttled around the Brooklyn Shops.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakland to San Jose and Sacramento to Auburn
    SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for FRA Grant Applications 2010 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - CAPITOL CORRIDOR: Oakland to San Jose and Sacramento to Auburn Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority August 5, 2010 (this page left blank intentionally) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Background – The Capitol Corridor Service .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 3.1 Capitol Corridor’s Role in Regional Transportation/Land Use ................................................................... 14 3.2 The California State Rail Plan and CCJPA’s Vision Plan .............................................................................. 17 3.3 Sorting Through Choices and Making Sound Decisions ............................................................................. 19 3.4 Summary – the Complete Package ............................................................................................................ 22 4 Identification of Alternatives .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]