DOCSLIB.ORG

Patt Uaf 0006N 10265.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Patt Uaf 0006N 10265.Pdf Life history characteristics, management strategies, and environmental and economic factors that contribute to the vulnerability of rockfish stocks off Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors Patt, Jacqueline Download date 26/09/2021 06:08:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4812 LIFE HISTORY CHARACTERISTICS, MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE VULNERABILITY OF ROCKFISH STOCKS OFF ALASKA A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By Jacqueline Patt, B.S. Fairbanks, Alaska December 2014 Abstract This study explored the extent to which variations in biological characteristics, environmental and economic factors, and management strategies have affected the tendency for rockfish to become overfished. The analysis used data on 5 species of rockfish that account for more than 95% of commercial catch of rockfish in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) and Bering Sea and Aleutian Island (BSAI) management regions. These species are: Shortraker Rockfish ( Sebastes borealis ), Pacific Ocean Perch ( Sebastes alutus ), Northern Rockfish ( Sebastes polyspinis ), Dusky Rockfish ( Sebastes variabilis ), and Shortspine Thornyhead ( Sebastolobus alascanus ). Fishery management models often treat BMSY , the biomass level that maximizes sustainable yield, as a critical reference point; whenever the biomass of a federally managed fish or shellfish stock is estimated at less than 0.5× BMSY , the stock is declared “overfished” and managers are required to develop a recovery plan that will restore stock abundance above BMSY within about one generation length. Because estimates of BMSY are unavailable for some GOA and BSAI rockfish stocks included in this analysis and because we were interested in developing a model that could be applied to data-poor stocks, we explored two proxies for BMSY . The mean of past estimates of exploitable biomass (avgExpB ) was used as a proxy for BMSY for the better-studied stocks. The mean of past catch ( avgC ) was used as a proxy for BMSY for data-poor stocks. These values were used to scale time series estimates of exploitable biomass ( ExpB t) or catch ( Ct). A systems estimation approach, seemingly unrelated regression (SUR), was used to estimate parameters of linear and nonlinear models that included available numerical and categorical variables (biological, management, environmental, and economic factors) thought to contribute to increases or decreases in ExpB t / avgExpB or Ct / avgC . Goodness-of-fit statistics and tests of individual coefficients and groupings of coefficients were used to guide model refinement. v The modeling approach worked well for better-studied stocks but not for data-poor stocks. The preferred 5-stock model (Pacific Ocean Perch in the GOA and BSAI, Northern Rockfish in the GOA and BSAI, and Dusky Rockfish in the GOA) had an excellent fit to the overall system (R2 = 0.922, P << 10-6) and statistically significant coefficient estimates of the variables included. The model indicated that the past values of ExpBt / avgExpB can be accounted for through time and across stocks by nonlinear variation in: spawning biomass, intrinsic growth rates (k), maximum age, exploitation rates, habitat preferences, Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and ex-vessel price. Because some of these factors are subject to management control and others are predictable, it should be possible to take account of anticipated changes in these factors when setting harvest targets and harvest limits, selecting spatial management strategies, or considering changes to harvest control rules or fisheries governance systems. vi Table of Contents Page Signature Page ............................................................................................................................................... i Title Page ..................................................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ vii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. xi List of Tables ..............................................................................................................................................xiii Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ xv 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Historical and Current Status of Alaskan Rockfish Fisheries .......................................................... 1 1.2 Federal Management ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 State Management ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Federal Management - Harvest Controls .......................................................................................... 4 1.5 Regulatory Complexes ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Bycatch and Discards ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.7 Research Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 7 2. Materials, Methods, and Model Specification .......................................................................................... 7 2.1 Data .................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 9 3. Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Tier 3 Models ................................................................................................................................. 15 3.2 Tier 4/5 Models .............................................................................................................................. 19 4. Discussion ............................................................................................................................................... 20 5. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................. 24 6. Literature Cited ....................................................................................................................................... 25 7. Appendix—Species Profiles ................................................................................................................... 57 7.1 Shortspine Thornyhead ................................................................................................................... 57 7.1.1 Life History ............................................................................................................................... 57 7.1.1.1 Morphology and Distribution .............................................................................................. 57 7.1.1.2 Trophic Interactions ............................................................................................................ 57 7.1.1.3 Age ...................................................................................................................................... 58 7.1.1.4 Reproduction ....................................................................................................................... 59 7.1.1.5 Larval and Juvenile Stages .................................................................................................. 60 vii Page 7.1.1.6 Habitat Preferences ............................................................................................................. 60 7.1.2 Management .............................................................................................................................. 60 7.1.2.1 Historical and Current Fisheries ......................................................................................... 60 7.1.2.2 Catch Trends ....................................................................................................................... 61 7.1.2.3 Incidental Catch .................................................................................................................. 62 7.1.2.4 Biomass Estimates in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands ....................................................... 62 7.1.2.5 Biomass Estimates in the Gulf of Alaska ............................................................................ 63 7.1.2.6 Changes in Stock Assessment Inputs and 2012-2013
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FISH LIST WISH LIST: a Case for Updating the Canadian Government’S Guidance for Common Names on Seafood
    FISH LIST WISH LIST: A case for updating the Canadian government’s guidance for common names on seafood Authors: Christina Callegari, Scott Wallace, Sarah Foster and Liane Arness ISBN: 978-1-988424-60-6 © SeaChoice November 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY . 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 Findings . 5 Recommendations . 6 INTRODUCTION . 7 APPROACH . 8 Identification of Canadian-caught species . 9 Data processing . 9 REPORT STRUCTURE . 10 SECTION A: COMMON AND OVERLAPPING NAMES . 10 Introduction . 10 Methodology . 10 Results . 11 Snapper/rockfish/Pacific snapper/rosefish/redfish . 12 Sole/flounder . 14 Shrimp/prawn . 15 Shark/dogfish . 15 Why it matters . 15 Recommendations . 16 SECTION B: CANADIAN-CAUGHT SPECIES OF HIGHEST CONCERN . 17 Introduction . 17 Methodology . 18 Results . 20 Commonly mislabelled species . 20 Species with sustainability concerns . 21 Species linked to human health concerns . 23 Species listed under the U .S . Seafood Import Monitoring Program . 25 Combined impact assessment . 26 Why it matters . 28 Recommendations . 28 SECTION C: MISSING SPECIES, MISSING ENGLISH AND FRENCH COMMON NAMES AND GENUS-LEVEL ENTRIES . 31 Introduction . 31 Missing species and outdated scientific names . 31 Scientific names without English or French CFIA common names . 32 Genus-level entries . 33 Why it matters . 34 Recommendations . 34 CONCLUSION . 35 REFERENCES . 36 APPENDIX . 39 Appendix A . 39 Appendix B . 39 FISH LIST WISH LIST: A case for updating the Canadian government’s guidance for common names on seafood 2 GLOSSARY The terms below are defined to aid in comprehension of this report. Common name — Although species are given a standard Scientific name — The taxonomic (Latin) name for a species. common name that is readily used by the scientific In nomenclature, every scientific name consists of two parts, community, industry has adopted other widely used names the genus and the specific epithet, which is used to identify for species sold in the marketplace.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E
    ReyeS-BONIllA eT Al: CheCklIST AND BIOgeOgRAphy Of fISheS fROm gUADAlUpe ISlAND CalCOfI Rep., Vol. 51, 2010 CHECKLIST AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FISHES FROM GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor REyES-BONILLA, Arturo AyALA-BOCOS, LUIS E. Calderon-AGUILERA SAúL GONzáLEz-Romero, ISRAEL SáNCHEz-ALCántara Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada AND MARIANA Walther MENDOzA Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada # 3918, zona Playitas, C.P. 22860 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Ensenada, B.C., México Departamento de Biología Marina Tel: +52 646 1750500, ext. 25257; Fax: +52 646 Apartado postal 19-B, CP 23080 [email protected] La Paz, B.C.S., México. Tel: (612) 123-8800, ext. 4160; Fax: (612) 123-8819 NADIA C. Olivares-BAñUELOS [email protected] Reserva de la Biosfera Isla Guadalupe Comisión Nacional de áreas Naturales Protegidas yULIANA R. BEDOLLA-GUzMáN AND Avenida del Puerto 375, local 30 Arturo RAMíREz-VALDEz Fraccionamiento Playas de Ensenada, C.P. 22880 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, B.C., México Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada km. 107, Apartado postal 453, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, B.C., México ABSTRACT recognized the biological and ecological significance of Guadalupe Island, off Baja California, México, is Guadalupe Island, and declared it a Biosphere Reserve an important fishing area which also harbors high (SEMARNAT 2005). marine biodiversity. Based on field data, literature Guadalupe Island is isolated, far away from the main- reviews, and scientific collection records, we pres- land and has limited logistic facilities to conduct scien- ent a comprehensive checklist of the local fish fauna, tific studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fish Conservation Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions
    Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca0 K. Smith & William J. Sutherland CONSERVATION EVIDENCE SERIES SYNOPSES Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca K. Smith and William J. Sutherland Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 1 Copyright © 2021 William J. Sutherland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Taylor, N., Clarke, L.J., Alliji, K., Barrett, C., McIntyre, R., Smith, R.K., and Sutherland, W.J. (2021) Marine Fish Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions. Synopses of Conservation Evidence Series. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Further details about CC BY licenses are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover image: Circling fish in the waters of the Halmahera Sea (Pacific Ocean) off the Raja Ampat Islands, Indonesia, by Leslie Burkhalter. Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES
    FMP for Groundfish of the BSAI Management Area Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES Appendix A History of the Fishery Management Plan ...................................................................... A-1 A.1 Amendments to the FMP ......................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B Geographical Coordinates of Areas Described in the Fishery Management Plan ..... B-1 B.1 Management Area, Subareas, and Districts ............................................................................. B-1 B.2 Closed Areas ............................................................................................................................ B-2 B.3 PSC Limitation Zones ........................................................................................................... B-18 Appendix C Summary of the American Fisheries Act and Subtitle II ............................................. C-1 C.1 Summary of the American Fisheries Act (AFA) Management Measures ............................... C-1 C.2 Summary of Amendments to AFA in the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 ................ C-2 C.3 American Fisheries Act: Subtitle II Bering Sea Pollock Fishery ............................................ C-4 Appendix D Life History Features and Habitat Requirements of Fishery Management Plan SpeciesD-1 D.1 Walleye pollock (Theragra calcogramma) ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Browning Washington 0250O 1
    Evidence of habitat associations and distribution patterns of rockfish in Puget Sound from archival data (1974-1977) Hilary F. Browning A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Marine Affairs University of Washington 2013 Committee: Terrie Klinger Ben Stewart-Koster Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Marine and Environmental Affairs 1 University of Washington Graduate School This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a master’s thesis by Hilary F. Browning and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Committee Members: _____________________________________________________ Terrie Klinger _____________________________________________________ Ben Stewart-Koster Date: __________________________________ 2 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Any other reproduction for any purposes or by any means shall not be allowed without my written permission. Signature: _________________________________ Date: _____________________________________ 3 University of Washington ABSTRACT Evidence of habitat associations and distribution patterns of rockfish in Puget Sound from archival data (1974-1977) Hilary F. Browning Chair of Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor Terrie Klinger School of Marine and Environmental Affairs Rockfish (Sebastes spp.) populations have declined dramatically and failed to recover in Puget Sound, WA following a period of heavy exploitation in the 1970s and 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockfish (Sebastes) That Are Evolutionarily Isolated Are Also
    Biological Conservation 142 (2009) 1787–1796 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Rockfish (Sebastes) that are evolutionarily isolated are also large, morphologically distinctive and vulnerable to overfishing Karen Magnuson-Ford a,b, Travis Ingram c, David W. Redding a,b, Arne Ø. Mooers a,b,* a Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 b IRMACS, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 c Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, #2370-6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: In an age of triage, we must prioritize species for conservation effort. Species more isolated on the tree of Received 23 September 2008 life are candidates for increased attention. The rockfish genus Sebastes is speciose (>100 spp.), morpho- Received in revised form 10 March 2009 logically and ecologically diverse and many species are heavily fished. We used a complete Sebastes phy- Accepted 18 March 2009 logeny to calculate a measure of evolutionary isolation for each species and compared this to their Available online 22 April 2009 morphology and imperilment. We found that evolutionarily isolated species in the northeast Pacific are both larger-bodied and, independent of body size, morphologically more distinctive. We examined Keywords: extinction risk within rockfish using a compound measure of each species’ intrinsic vulnerability to Phylogenetic diversity overfishing and categorizing species as commercially fished or not. Evolutionarily isolated species in Extinction risk Conservation priorities the northeast Pacific are more likely to be fished, and, due to their larger sizes and to life history traits Body size such as long lifespan and slow maturation rate, they are also intrinsically more vulnerable to overfishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the Rougheye/Blackspotted Rockfish Complex (Sebastes Aleutianus and S
    DRAFT SPECIES AT RISK ACT MANAGESPECIESMENT PLAN AT RISK SERIES ACT MANAGEMENT PLAN SERIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE ROUGHEYE/BLACKSPOTTEDMANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE ROCKFISH ROUGHEY E COMPLEXROCKFISHROUGHEYE (SEBASTES ALEUTIANUSROCKFISH COMPLEX AND S. MELANOSTICTUS(SEBASTES ALEUTIANUS) AND LONGSPINE AND S. THORNYHEADMELANOSTICTUS (SEBASTOLOBUS) AND LONGSPINE ALTIVELIS THORNYHE) IN AD CANADA(SEBAST OLOBUS ALTIVELIS)INCANADA SEBASTES ALEUTIANUS; SEBASTES MELANOSTICTUS SEBASTES ASEBASTOLOBUSLEUTIANUS; SEBASTES ALTIVELIS MEL ANOSTICTUS SEBASTOLOBUS ALTIVELIS S. aleutianus S. melanostictus 2012 Photo Credit: DFO Sebastolobus altivelis 2012 About the Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series What is the Species at Risk Act (SARA)? SARA is the Act developed by the federal government as a key contribution to the common national effort to protect and conserve species at risk in Canada. SARA came into force in 2003, and one of its purposes is “to manage species of special concern to prevent them from becoming endangered or threatened.” What is a species of special concern? Under SARA, a species of special concern is a wildlife species that could become threatened or endangered because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats. Species of special concern are included in the SARA List of Wildlife Species at Risk. What is a management plan? Under SARA, a management plan is an action-oriented planning document that identifies the conservation activities and land use measures needed to ensure, at a minimum, that a species of special concern does not become threatened or endangered. For many species, the ultimate aim of the management plan will be to alleviate human threats and remove the species from the List of Wildlife Species at Risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Southward Range Extension of the Goldeye Rockfish, Sebastes
    Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 51(2), 2021, 153–158 | DOI 10.3897/aiep.51.68832 Southward range extension of the goldeye rockfish, Sebastes thompsoni (Actinopterygii: Scorpaeniformes: Scorpaenidae), to northern Taiwan Tak-Kei CHOU1, Chi-Ngai TANG2 1 Department of Oceanography, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 2 Department of Aquaculture, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan http://zoobank.org/5F8F5772-5989-4FBA-A9D9-B8BD3D9970A6 Corresponding author: Tak-Kei Chou ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ronald Fricke ♦ Received 18 May 2021 ♦ Accepted 7 June 2021 ♦ Published 12 July 2021 Citation: Chou T-K, Tang C-N (2021) Southward range extension of the goldeye rockfish, Sebastes thompsoni (Actinopterygii: Scorpaeniformes: Scorpaenidae), to northern Taiwan. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 51(2): 153–158. https://doi.org/10.3897/ aiep.51.68832 Abstract The goldeye rockfish,Sebastes thompsoni (Jordan et Hubbs, 1925), is known as a typical cold-water species, occurring from southern Hokkaido to Kagoshima. In the presently reported study, a specimen was collected from the local fishery catch off Keelung, northern Taiwan, which represents the first specimen-based record of the genus in Taiwan. Moreover, the new record ofSebastes thompsoni in Taiwan represented the southernmost distribution of the cold-water genus Sebastes in the Northern Hemisphere. Keywords cold-water fish, DNA barcoding, neighbor-joining, new recorded genus, phylogeny, Sebastes joyneri Introduction On an occasional survey in a local fish market (25°7.77′N, 121°44.47′E), a mature female individual of The rockfish genusSebastes Cuvier, 1829 is the most spe- Sebastes thompsoni (Jordan et Hubbs, 1925) was obtained ciose group of the Scorpaenidae, which comprises about in the local catches, which were caught off Keelung, north- 110 species worldwide (Li et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific False Kelpfish, Sebastiscus Marmoratus (Cuvier, 1829) (Scorpaeniformes, Sebastidae) Found in Norwegian Waters
    BioInvasions Records (2018) Volume 7, Issue 1: 73–78 Open Access DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2018.7.1.11 © 2018 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2018 REABIC Research Article Pacific false kelpfish, Sebastiscus marmoratus (Cuvier, 1829) (Scorpaeniformes, Sebastidae) found in Norwegian waters Haakon Hansen1,* and Egil Karlsbakk2 1Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750 Sentrum, NO-0106 Oslo, Norway 2Department of Biology, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway Author e-mails: [email protected] (HH), [email protected] (EK) *Corresponding author Received: 28 September 2017 / Accepted: 21 November 2017 / Published online: 1 December 2017 Handling editor: Henn Ojaveer Abstract During an angling competition in the Oslofjord, Southern Norway, a fish species previously unknown to the anglers was caught. Subsequent morphological studies and DNA barcoding identified it as a false kelpfish, Sebastiscus marmoratus (Cuvier, 1829), a species native to the Western Pacific from southern Hokkaido, Japan to the Philippines. The specimen was a female with a length of 29.2 cm and weighing 453 g. Stomach contents revealed fish remains, as well as the brachyuran Xantho pilipes A. Milne-Edwards, 1867 and remains of anomuran decapods. Parasitological examination revealed infections with the locally common generalist parasites Derogenes varicus (Digenea) and Hysterothylacium aduncum (Nematoda) that likely have been acquired through prey fish. A literature study of the parasites of S. marmoratus was carried out, listing at least 31 species. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of this fish species in the Atlantic. The introduction route is unknown, but the most likely possibility is via a ship’s ballast water as a larva or fry, which again would imply that the specimen has been in temperate waters for several years.
    [Show full text]
  • XIV. Appendices
    Appendix 1, Page 1 XIV. Appendices Appendix 1. Vertebrate Species of Alaska1 * Threatened/Endangered Fishes Scientific Name Common Name Eptatretus deani black hagfish Lampetra tridentata Pacific lamprey Lampetra camtschatica Arctic lamprey Lampetra alaskense Alaskan brook lamprey Lampetra ayresii river lamprey Lampetra richardsoni western brook lamprey Hydrolagus colliei spotted ratfish Prionace glauca blue shark Apristurus brunneus brown cat shark Lamna ditropis salmon shark Carcharodon carcharias white shark Cetorhinus maximus basking shark Hexanchus griseus bluntnose sixgill shark Somniosus pacificus Pacific sleeper shark Squalus acanthias spiny dogfish Raja binoculata big skate Raja rhina longnose skate Bathyraja parmifera Alaska skate Bathyraja aleutica Aleutian skate Bathyraja interrupta sandpaper skate Bathyraja lindbergi Commander skate Bathyraja abyssicola deepsea skate Bathyraja maculata whiteblotched skate Bathyraja minispinosa whitebrow skate Bathyraja trachura roughtail skate Bathyraja taranetzi mud skate Bathyraja violacea Okhotsk skate Acipenser medirostris green sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus white sturgeon Polyacanthonotus challengeri longnose tapirfish Synaphobranchus affinis slope cutthroat eel Histiobranchus bathybius deepwater cutthroat eel Avocettina infans blackline snipe eel Nemichthys scolopaceus slender snipe eel Alosa sapidissima American shad Clupea pallasii Pacific herring 1 This appendix lists the vertebrate species of Alaska, but it does not include subspecies, even though some of those are featured in the CWCS.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Fishes of California
    COMMON FISHES OF CALIFORNIA Updated July 2016 Blue Rockfish - SMYS Sebastes mystinus 2-4 bands around front of head; blue to black body, dark fins; anal fin slanted Size: 8-18in; Depth: 0-200’+ Common from Baja north to Canada North of Conception mixes with mostly with Olive and Black R.F.; South with Blacksmith, Kelp Bass, Halfmoons and Olives. Black Rockfish - SMEL Sebastes melanops Blue to blue-back with black dots on their dorsal fins; anal fin rounded Size: 8-18 in; Depth: 8-1200’ Common north of Point Conception Smaller eyes and a bit more oval than Blues Olive/Yellowtail Rockfish – OYT Sebastes serranoides/ flavidus Several pale spots below dorsal fins; fins greenish brown to yellow fins Size: 10-20in; Depth: 10-400’+ Midwater fish common south of Point Conception to Baja; rare north of Conception Yellowtail R.F. is a similar species are rare south of Conception, while being common north Black & Yellow Rockfish - SCHR Sebastes chrysomelas Yellow blotches of black/olive brown body;Yellow membrane between third and fourth dorsal fin spines Size: 6-12in; Depth: 0-150’ Common central to southern California Inhabits rocky areas/crevices Gopher Rockfish - SCAR Sebastes carnatus Several small white blotches on back; Pale blotch extends from dorsal spine onto back Size: 6-12 in; Depth: 8-180’ Common central California Inhabits rocky areas/crevice. Territorial Copper Rockfish - SCAU Sebastes caurinus Wide, light stripe runs along rear half on lateral line Size:: 10-16in; Depth: 10-600’ Inhabits rocky reefs, kelpbeds,
    [Show full text]