Hindawi Advances in High Energy Physics Volume 2018, Article ID 8504894, 7 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8504894

Research Article Absorption Cross Section and Decay Rate of Dilatonic Black Strings

Huriye Gürsel and Ezzet SakallJ

Physics Department, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus, Mersin 10, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to ˙Izzet Sakallı; [email protected]

Received 25 October 2018; Accepted 4 December 2018; Published 19 December 2018

Academic Editor: Piero Nicolini

Copyright © 2018 Huriye Gursel¨ and ˙Izzet Sakallı. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Te publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

We studied in detail the propagation of a massive tachyonic scalar feld in the background of a fve-dimensional (5�) Einstein–Yang–Mills–Born–Infeld– black : the massive Klein–Gordon equation was solved, exactly. Next we obtained complete analytical expressions for the greybody factor, absorption cross section, and decay rate for the tachyonic scalar feld in the geometry under consideration. Te behaviors of the obtained results are graphically represented for diferent values of the theory’s free parameters. We also discuss why should be used instead of ordinary for the analytical derivation of the greybody factor of the dilatonic 5� black string.

1. Introduction of time. It is also worth noting that although BSs are defned as a higher-dimensional generalization of a BH, in which 2 1 A wealth of information about quantum gravity can be the event horizon is topologically equivalent to � ×� and �−1 1 obtained by studying the unique and fascinating objects spacetime is asymptotically � ×�,four-dimensional known as black holes (BHs). In BH physics, greybody factors (4�) BSs are also derived. Lemos and Santos [19–21] showed (GFs) modify black-body radiation, or predicted Hawking that cylindrically symmetric static solutions, with a negative radiation [1, 2], within the limits of geometrical optics [3]. cosmological constant, of the Einstein–Maxwell equations In other words, GFs modify the Hawking radiation spectrum admit charged 4� BSs. A rotating version of the charged 4� observed at spatial infnity (SI), so that the radiation is not BSs [22, 23] exhibits features similar to the Kerr-Newman BH purely Planckian [4]. insphericaltopology.TeproblemofanalyzingGFsofscalar GF, absorption cross section (ACS), and decay rate felds from charged 4� BSs has recently been discussed by (DR) are quantities dependent upon both the frequency of Ahmed and Saifullah [24]. An interesting point about GFs radiation and the geometry of spacetime. Currently, although has been reported by [25]: BH energy loss during Hawking there are many studies of GF, ACS, and DR (see, for example, radiation depends, crucially, on the GF and the particles’ [5–10] and the references therein), the number of analytical degrees of freedom. studies of GFs that consider modifed black-body radiation As mentioned above, further study of the GFs of BSs of higher-dimensional (�>4) spacetimes, like the BHs in is required. To fll this literature gap, in the current study, and black strings [11–13], is rather limited (see, we considered dilatonic 5� BS [26], which is a solution forinstance,[6,7,14–18]).Tispaucityofstudieshasarisen to the Einstein–Yang–Mills–Born–Infeld–dilaton (EYMBID) from the mathematical difculty of obtaining an analytical theory. We analytically studied its GF, ACS, and DR for solution to the wave equation of the stringent geometry massive scalar felds; however, we considered tachyonic being considered; in fact, analytical GF computations apply to scalar particles instead of ordinary ones. Te main reason spacetimes in which the metric components are independent for this consideration is that using ordinary in the 2 Advances in High Energy Physics

Klein–Gordon equation (KGE) of the dilatonic 5� BS (as will Newtonian constant and its relation to its 4� form (�(4)) is be explained in detail later) leads to the diverging of GFs. given by Roughly speaking, this is due to the fux of the propagating � =� ��−4, waves of the ordinary massive scalar felds. Namely, once (�) (4) (2) the scalar felds to be considered belong to the massive � � (∫ �� = ordinary particles, the incoming SI fux becomes zero. Te where istheupperlimitofthecompactcoordinate 0 latter remark implies that detectable radiation emitted from a �).Furthermore,R stands for the Ricci scalar and �= �(�)�(�)�� dilatonic 5� BS spacetime belongs to the massive tachyonic �� where the 2-form Yang–Mills feld is given by scalar felds. Terefore, the current study focuses on the wave (�) (�) 1 (�) (�) (�) dynamics of tachyonic particles moving in dilatonic 5� BS � =�� + � (� ∧� ) , (3) 2� (�)(�) spacetime. However, using tachyonic modes in 5� geometry (�) should not be seen as nonphysical; instead they should be with � and � being structure and coupling constants, considered as the imaginary mass felds rather than faster- (�)(�) �(�) than-light particles [27]. First, Feinberg [28, 29] proposed respectively. Te Yang–Mills potential is defned by that tachyonic particles could be quanta of a quantum feld followingtheWu-Yangansatz[35] with imaginary mass. It was soon realized that excitations of � �(�) = (� �� −��� ), such imaginary mass felds do not in fact propagate faster than �2 � � � � (4) light [30]. Following the idea of Kaluza–Klein [31], any 4� physical �−1 �2 = ∑�2, trajectory is the projection of higher-dimensional worldlines. � �=1 Efective 4� worldlines associated with massive particles are (5) causality constrained to be timelike. However, the corre- (�−1)(�−2) 2≤�+1≤�≤�−1,1≤�≤ , sponding higher-dimensional worldlines need not be exclu- 2 sively timelike, which gives rise to a topological classifcation � of physical objects. In particular, elementary particles in a 5� where is the Yang–Mills charge. Te solution for the dilaton geometry should be viewed as tachyonic modes. Te exis- is as follows: tence of tachyons in higher dimensions has been thoroughly (�−2) � ln � �=− . (6) studied by Davidson and Owen [32]. Furthermore, the reader 2 �2 +1 may refer to [33] to understand condensation in the On the other hand, the line-element of the dilatonic 5� BS is evaporation process of a BS. To fnd the analytical GF, ACS, given by [26] andDR,wehaveshownhowtoobtainthecompleteanalytical solution to the massive KGE in the geometry of a dilatonic 5� � (�) ���2 ��2 =− �̃�2 + +���̃2 BS. 0 � �� (�) Our work is organized as follows. Following this intro- (7) 2 2 2 duction, a brief overview of the geometry of the dilatonic +�(�� + sin ��� ), 5� BS is provided in Section 2. Section 3 describes the KGE 5� 2 of the tachyonic felds in the dilatonic BS geometry; we where �(�) = � − �+ and �=4�/3. �+ represents the outer present the exact solution of the radial equation in terms event horizon having the following (�+1)−dimensional form: of hypergeometric functions. In Section 4, we compute the 2 (�−2)/2 GF and consequently the ACS and DR of the dilatonic 5� 32 � � (�(�−2)+2)/� ( ) =� . (8) BS, respectively. We then graphically exhibit the results of ��−4 �−1 + the ACS and DR. Section 5 concludes with the fnal remarks �=5( ,� = 4) drawn from our study. Because, in our case, i.e. , the horizon becomes 2/5 4/5 2. Dilatonic 5� BS in EYMBID Theory �+ =4� = 4.488� . (9) �(=�+1)-dimensional action in the EYMBID theory is Afer rescaling the metric (7) given by [26] ��2 ��2 = 0 1 � � =− ∫ ��� −� ������ √ (10) 16��(�) M 2 � (�) 2 �� � 2 2 2 2 =− �̃� + + ��̃ +�� + sin ��� , 2 (1) �2 �� (�) � 4(��) ��2� ⋅ [R − +4�2�−�� (1 − √1+ )] , �−2 2�2 and in sequel assigning ̃� and �̃ coordinates to the new [ ] coordinates where � is the dilaton feld, � denotes the Born–Infeld ̃��→��, parameter [34], and � = −(4/(� − 2))� with the dilaton (11) √ ��→��,̃ parameter �=1/ �−1. �(�) represents the �-dimensional Advances in High Energy Physics 3

� we get the metric that will be used in our computations: where �� (�, �) is the usual spherical harmonics and � is a constant. Afer making straightforward calculations, we ��2 ��2 =−�(�) ��2 + + ����2 +��2 + 2 ���2. obtained the radial equation as follows: �� (�) sin (12) ̈ ̇ 2 2 � � ̇ � � 2 �� + (�+��) + − +� −�=0, (22) It is worth noting that the surface gravity [36] of the � � � �� dilatonic 5� BS can be evaluated by where �=�(�+1)and a dot mark denotes a derivative with 1 � �2 =− ��Υ�� Υ � , respect to �. Multiplying each term by ���(�)�(�) and using � ���=� (13) 2 + the ansatz �=(�+ − �)/�+, which in turn implies �=�+ −��+, � one gets in which Υ represents the timelike Killing vector: �� � � �(1−�)� +(1−2�)� Υ = [1, 0, 0, 0, 0] . (14) �2 �2 (23) Ten, (13) results in +[ + −�2 +�]�=0, ��+ �(1−�)�+ � � √�� � √�+ �= � = , � 2 � 2 (15) where prime denotes derivative with respect to .Setting ��=�+ �2 �2 �2 �2 � [ + −�2 +�]= − +�, where the prime denotes the derivative with respect to .Fur- �� �(1−�)� � 1−� (24) thermore, the associated Hawking temperature is expressed + + by one can obtain � � √�+ � = = . (16) �=− , � 2� 4� 2� �� ItisimportanttoremarkthattheHawkingtemperatureof �= , (25) the dilatonic BS given in (40) of [26] is incorrect. Te authors 2�√� of [26] computed the Hawking temperature of the dilatonic 2 5� BS considering the metric to be symmetric, which is not �=�−�. the case since ��� =1/�̸ ��. Meanwhile, it is obvious that Equation(23)canbesolvedbycomparingitwiththe dilatonic 5� BS (12) has a nonasymptotically fat structure. standard hypergeometric diferential equation [40] which Terefore, it possesses a quasilocal mass [37–39], which can admits the following solution: be computed as follows: �� −� 1 4 �=� (−�) (1 − �) � (�, �; �; �) � = ��3/2�= �8/5� ≅ 2.113�16/5�. 1 �� ℎ (17) (26) 6 3 −�� −� +�2 (−�) (1 − �) � (�, �; �; �) , Tus, the frst law of thermodynamics is satisfed: where �� =� �� , �� � �� (18) 1 �= (1 + √1+4�)+��−�, 2 (27) where ��� denotes the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy [36], which takes the following form for the dilatonic 5� BS: 1 �= (1−√1+4�)+��−�, (28) � 1 � 2� � 2 � = � = �� ∫ ��� ∫ �� ∫ �� �� ℎ sin � = 1 + 2��. 4 4 0 0 0 (19) (29)

=����ℎ. And �=�−�+1, 3. Wave Equation of a Massive Scalar (30) Tachyonic Field in Dilatonic 5� BS �=�−�+1, (31)

As the scalar waves being studied belong to the massive scalar �=2−�. (32) tachyons, the corresponding KGE is given by According to our calculations, to have a nonzero SI incoming 2 2 [◻ − (��) ]Ψ(�, r) =[◻+� ]Ψ(�, r) =0. (20) fux (see (53)) or nondivergent GF (see (55)), √1+4�must be imaginary. To this end, we must impose the following We chose the ansatz as follows: condition: � ��� −��� 2 Ψ (�, r) =�(�) �� (�, �) � � , (21) 4� >4�+1, (33) 4 Advances in High Energy Physics

such that To express (41) in a more compact form, let us perform the following simplifcations. Considering √1+4�=��, (34) 1 −�� − � − � = − (1+��) , (42) where 2

�=√4�2 −4�−1, �∈R. (35) together with 1 −�� − � − � = − (1−��) , To obtain a physically acceptable solution, we must terminate 2 (43) the outgoing solution at the horizon, which can be simply done by imposing �1 =0. Tus, the physical radial solution and letting �=−�,theradialequationfor��→∞takes reduces to the form �=� (−�)−�� (1 − �)−� � (�, �; �; �) . 1 Γ(�)Γ(�−�) 2 (36) � = [� �−��/2 �� √� 2 Γ (�) Γ(�−�) It should be noted that checking the forms of (36) both at (44) the horizon and at SI is essential. Section 3 shows that both Γ(�)Γ(�−�) +� ���/2 ]. are needed for the evaluation of the GF. For the near horizon 2 Γ (�) Γ(�−�) (NH) where ��→0,onecanstate � −�� One can express in terms of the tortoise coordinate at SI as � =� (−�) , (37) �� 2 �� �∗ = ∫ �→ which implies that the purely ingoing plane wave reads √�� (45) −��(�̂ +�) ��� 2 � =�� ∗ � , (38) ∗ �� 2 ̂�∗ = lim � ≃− , ��→∞ √� where such that ∗ �� � = ∫ �→ �=�−� √�� + (46) −2�̂ (−�) �| ≃�=4� ∗ , ̂� = �∗ ≃ ln , ��→∞ ∗ ��→�lim + √�+ ∗ (39) where ̂�∗ = ln � . Terefore, we have 1 ̂� ≃ (−�) �⇒ 1 ��̂ � −��̂ � ∗ 2� ln � = [Λ � ∗ +Λ � ∗ ] , �� √� 1 2 (47) 2��̂ �=−� ∗ . where On the other hand, for ��→∞, the inverse transforma- Γ(�)Γ(�−�) Λ =2−��� , tion of the hypergeometric function is given by [41] 1 2 Γ (�) Γ(�−�) (48)

−� Γ(�)Γ(�−�) Γ(�)Γ(�−�) � (�, �; �; �) = (−�) Λ =2−��� . Γ (�) Γ(�−�) 2 2 Γ (�) Γ(�−�) (49) 1 ×�(�,�+1−�;�+1−�; ) Tus, the asymptotic wave solution becomes � ��� (40) � �(�̂ �−��) −�(�̂ �+��) Γ(�)Γ(�−�) � = [Λ � ∗ +Λ � ∗ ]. (50) +(−�)−� �� √� 1 2 Γ (�) Γ(�−�) 1 4. Radiation of Dilatonic 5� BS ×�(�,�+1−�;�+1−�; ), � 4.1. Te Flux Computation. In this section, we compute the (� �→ � ) which yields the following asymptotic solution: ingoing fux at the horizon + and the asymptotic fuxfortheSIregion(� �→ ∞).Teevaluationofthesefux Γ(�)Γ(�−�) values will enable us to calculate the GF and, subsequently, � ≃� (−�)−��−�−� �� 2 Γ (�) Γ(�−�) theACSandDR. (41) Te NH-fux can be calculated via [42, 43] −��−�−� Γ(�)Γ(�−�) ��� +�2 (−�) .  = (� �� � −� �� � ), Γ (�) Γ(�−�) �� 2� �� ∗ �� �� ∗ �� (51) Advances in High Energy Physics 5 which, afer a few manipulations, can be written as l,k � �2 �� =−4����2� �+. (52) 1.5 Te incoming fux at SI is computed via �  = �� (� �� � −� �� � ). 1.0 �� 2� �� ∗ �� �� ∗ �� (53)

Having performed the steps to evaluate the derivatives with 0.5 respect to the tortoise coordinate, the incoming fux at SI takes the form � �2 0 �� =−4���Λ 2� �. (54) 012345678 

It is important to remark that if we were dealing with 2,1 0,1 �   the standard particles rather than tachyons, (35) would be 1,1 0,0 imaginary, i.e., ��→��, and therefore SI incoming wave �,� wouldleadthisfuxevaluation(53)tobezero.Tiswould Figure 1: Plots of the ACS (� ) versus frequency �.Teplotsare indicate the existence of a divergent GF. governed by (63). Te confguration of the dilatonic 5� BS is as follows: �=3and � = 0.2. 4.2. ACS of Dilatonic 5� BS. Te GF of the dilatonic 5� BS is obtained by the following expression [6, 8]: which, in our case, becomes � �2  −4�� �� � � ��,� = �� = � 2� + , 2 � �2 (55) �,� 4� (�+1) �� 2��/�  −4�� �Λ � � � = + (� −1)Ξ. (63) �� � 2� �4 which is nothing but Furthermore, one can also get the total ACS as follows � �2 [45]: �� � � ��,� = � 2� + . � �2 (56) ∞ �Λ 2� � ����� �,� ���� = ∑� . (64) �=0 Afer a few manipulations, with (see [40])

� �2 � In Figure 1, the relationship between absorption ACS and �Γ(��)� = , (57) � sinh (��) frequency is examined; the fgure is drawn based on (63). In the high frequency regime, all ACSs tend to vanish by �� � �2 following the same curve. Unlike the high frequency regime, �Γ(1+��)� = , (58) sinh (��) ACSs diverge in the low frequency regime as ��→0.Asa �,� � �2 fnal remark, negative � behavior has not been observed in � 1 � � �Γ( +��)� = , our graphical analyses, which means that superradiance does � 2 � (��) (59) cosh not occur [46], as expected (as the dilatonic 5� BS (12) does not rotate). (56)canbepresentedas �� 5� ��,� = + (�2��/� −1) Ξ, 4.3. DR of Dilatonic BS. Te fnal step follows from � (60) theACSevaluation.TeDRofthedilatonic5� BS can be computed via [8] where ��,� 4� (�+1)2 �� �2�� −1 Γ�,� = = + Ξ. (65) Ξ= . �� �2��/� −1 �4 [��(�+�/�−�/�√�) +1][��(�+�/�+�/�√�) +1] (61) Figure 2 shows how the DR behaves with respect to To evaluate the ACS of the dilatonic 5� BS concerned, we the frequency. By taking (65) as the reference, the plots for follow the study of [44]. Tus, one can get the ACS expression increasing � areillustrated.Inthehighfrequencyregime,all in 5� as follows: DRs fade in the same way. In the low frequency regime, DRs � 2 tend to diverge. However, it can be observed that when has �,� 4� (�+1) �,� � � = � , (62) larger values, the corresponding DR diverges when is much �3 closer to zero. 6 Advances in High Energy Physics

l,k ΓDR and suggestions. Tis work is supported by Eastern Mediter- ranean University through the project BAPC-04-18-01.

1.5 References

[1] S. W. Hawking, “Black hole explosions?” Nature,vol.248,no. 1.0 5443, pp. 30-31, 1974. [2] S. W. Hawking, “ creation by black holes,” Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics,vol.43,no.3,pp.199–220,1975, 0.5 erratum: ibid, vol. 46, p. 206, 1976. [3] S. Creek, O. Efhimiou, P. Kanti, and K. Tamvakis, “Greybody factors for brane scalar felds in a rotating black hole back- ground,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Cosmology,vol.75,no.8,084043,17pages,2007.  [4] P. Boonserm, “Rigorous bounds on Transmission, Refec- tion, and Bogoliubov coefcients,” 2009, https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2,1 0,1 ΓDR ΓDR 0907.0045. 1,1 0,0 [5] C. Hoyos and P. Koroteev, “On the null energy condition and ΓDR ΓDR causality in lifshitz holography,” Physical Review D: Particles, �,� Figure 2: Plots of the DR (Γ�� ) versus frequency �.Teplotsare Fields,GravitationandCosmology,vol.82,ArticleID109905, governed by (65). Te confguration of the dilatonic 5� BS is as 2010. follows: �=3and � = 0.2. [6]T.Harmark,J.Natario,andR.Schiappa,“GreybodyFactors for d-Dimensional Black Holes,” Advances in Teoretical and Mathematical Physics,vol.14,no.3,pp.727–793,2010. [7] R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and B. Vercnocke, “Natural infation in 5. Conclusion supergravity and beyond,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 90, Article ID 041303(R), 2014. Tis article evaluated the GF, ACS, and DR for the dilatonic [8] A. Sanchez-Breta´ no,M.Callejo,M.Montero,˜ A.´ L. Alonso- 5� BS geometry arising from the EYMBID theory. As a Gomez,´ M. J. Delgado, and E. Isorna, “Performing a hepatic resultoftheanalyticalmethodwefollowed,itwasshownthat timing signal: glucocorticoids induce gper1a and gper1b expres- the radiation of the dilatonic 5� BS spacetime can only be sion and repress gclock1a and gbmal1a in the liver of goldfsh,” causedbytachyons.Tecrucialpointhereisthatifstandard JournalofComparativePhysiologyB:Biochemical,Systemic,and scalar particles had been used rather than tachyonic ones, Environmental Physiology,vol.186,no.1,pp.73–82,2016. zero incoming fux at SI would have been obtained, which [9] G. Panotopoulos and A. Rincon, “Greybody factors for a would lead to the diverging of the GF. Terefore, in a way, we minimally coupled massless scalar feld in Einstein-Born- were forced to use tachyons to solve this problem, and this Infeld dilaton spacetime,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, carries great importance as it implies that the ffh dimension Gravitation and Cosmology,vol.96,no.2,025009,7pages,2017. could be directly linked to tachyons. In short, according to [10] Y.Zhang,C.Li,andB.Chen,“Greybodyfactorsforaspherically symmetric Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet–de Sitter black hole,” Physi- our analytical method, we obtained results (compatible with 5� cal Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology,vol. boundary conditions) when the radiation of the dilatonic 97, Article ID 044013, 2018. BS was provided by the tachyons. [11] J. Kunz, “Black holes in higher dimensions (black strings and In future study, we want to extend our analysis to the black rings),” in Proceedings of the MG13 Meeting on General 5� Dirac equation for the geometry of the dilatonic BS. Relativity, pp. 568–581, Stockholm University, Sweden, 2015. Hence, we are planning to undertake similar analysis for [12] R. Gregory and R. Lafamme, “Te instability of charged black and compare the results with scalar ones. strings and p-branes,” . B. Teoretical, Phe- nomenological,andExperimentalHighEnergyPhysics.Quan- tum Field Teory and Statistical Systems,vol.428,no.1-2,pp. Data Availability 399–434, 1994. Te data that support the fndings of this study are available [13] R. Gregory and R. Lafamme, “Black strings and p-branes are unstable,” Physical Review Letters,vol.70,no.19,pp.2837–2840, from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. 1993. [14] I. R. Klebanov and S. D. Mathur, “Black hole greybody factors Conflicts of Interest andabsorptionofscalarsbyefectivestrings,”Nuclear Physics. B. Teoretical, Phenomenological, and Experimental High Energy Te authors declare that they have no conficts of interest. Physics. Quantum Field Teory and Statistical Systems,vol.500, no. 1-3, pp. 115–132, 1997. [15] J. Callan, S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. A. Tseytlin, Acknowledgments “AbsorptionoffxedscalarsandtheD-braneapproachtoblack holes,” NuclearPhysics.B.Teoretical,Phenomenological,and We wish to thank Prof. Dr. Mustafa Halilsoy for drawing Experimental High Energy Physics. Quantum Field Teory and our attention to this problem and for his helpful comments Statistical Systems,vol.489,no.1-2,pp.65–94,1997. Advances in High Energy Physics 7

[16] M. Cvetic and F. Larsen, “General rotating black holes in string [35] T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang , in Properties of Matter Under Unusual theory: greybody factors and event horizons,” Physical Review Conditions, New York, NY, USA, Interscience, 1969, edited by D:Particles,Fields,GravitationandCosmology,vol.56,no.8, H. Mark and S. Fernbach. pp. 4994–5007, 1997. [36] R. M. Wald, General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, [17] I. R. Klebanov and M. Krasnitz, “Fixed scalar greybody factors London, UK, 1984. in fve and four dimensions,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, [37] J. D. Brown and J. W.York Jr., “Quasilocal energy and conserved Gravitation and Cosmology,vol.55,no.6,pp.R3250–R3254, charges derived from the gravitational action,” Physical Review 1997. D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology,vol.47,no.4,pp. [18] S. S. Gubser and I. R. Klebanov, “Emission of charged particles 1407–1419, 1993. from four- and fve-dimensional black holes,” Nuclear Physics. [38] S. Bose and N. Dadhich, “Brown-York quasilocal energy, B.Teoretical,Phenomenological,andExperimentalHighEnergy gravitational charge, and black hole horizons,” Physical Review Physics. Quantum Field Teory and Statistical Systems,vol.482, D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology,vol.60,no.6, no. 1-2, pp. 173–186, 1996. Article ID 064010, 7 pages, 1999. [19] J. P. Lemos, “Two-dimensional black holes and planar general [39] S. Chakraborty and N. Dadhich, “Brown-York quasilocal relativity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity,vol.12,no.4,pp. energy in Lanczos-Lovelock gravity and black hole horizon,” 1081–1086, 1995. JournalofHighEnergyPhysics, vol. 12, p. 003, 2015. [20] J. P. S. Lemos, “Tree dimensional black holes and cylindrical [40] M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical general relativity,” Physics Letters B,vol.353,p.46,1995. Functions, with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, [21] N. O. Santos, “Solution of the vacuum Einstein equations with Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1972. nonzero cosmological constant for a stationary cylindrically [41] S. Y. Slavyanov and W. Lay, Special Functions, A Unifed Te- symmetric spacetime,” Classical and Quantum Gravity,vol.10, ory Based on Singularities, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, no.11,pp.2401–2406,1993. Oxford, UK, 2000. [22] J. P. S. Lemos and V. T. Zanchin, “Rotating charged black [42] S. Fernando, “Greybody factors of charged dilaton black holes strings and three-dimensional black holes,” Physical Review D: in 2 + 1 dimensions,” General Relativity and Gravitation,vol.37, Particles,Fields,GravitationandCosmology,vol.54,no.6,pp. no.3,pp.461–481,2005. 3840–3853, 1996. [43] M. Andrews, M. Lewandowski, M. Trodden, and D. Wesley, [23] R. G. Cai and Y. Z. Zhang, “Black plane solutions in four- “Distinguishing k-defects from their canonical twins,” Physical dimensional spacetimes,” Physical Review D,vol.54,p.4891, Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology,vol.82, 1996. Article ID 105006, 2010. [24] J. Ahmed and K. Saifullah, “Greybody factor of scalar felds [44] P. Kanti, J. Grain, and A. Barrau, “Bulk and brane decay from black strings,” Te European Physical Journal C,vol.77,p. of a-dimensional Schwarzschild-de SITter black hole: scalar 885, 2017. radiation,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and [25] E. K. Akhmedov and J. Pulido, “Solar oscillations Cosmology,vol.71,no.10,104002,18pages,2005. and bounds on neutrino magnetic moment and solar magnetic [45] W. G. Unruh, “Absorption cross section of small black holes,” feld,” Physics Letters B,vol.553,no.1-2,pp.7–17,2003. Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, [26] S. H. Mazharimousavia and M. Halilsoy, “Non-Abelian mag- vol.14,no.12,p.3251. netic black strings versus black holes,” Te European Physical [46] S. Chandrasekhar, Te Mathematical Teory of Black Holes,Te Journal Plus,vol.131,p.138,2016. Clarendon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1983. [27] A. Sen, “Rolling Tachyon,” Journal of High Energy Physics,vol. 2002,no.04,p.048,2002. [28] G. Feinberg, “Possibility of faster-than-light particles,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics,vol.159,no.5, pp. 1089–1105, 1967. [29] L. Wolfenstein, “Neutrino oscillations in matter,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology,vol.17, no. 9, pp. 2369–2374, 1978. [30] Y. Aharonov, A. Komar, and L. Susskind, “Superluminal Behav- ior, Causality, and Instability,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics,vol.182,no.5,pp.1400–1403, 1969. [31] O. Klein, “Quantentheorie und funfdimensionale¨ relativitatstheorie,”¨ Zeitschrif fur¨ Physik,vol.37,no.12, pp.895–906,1926. [32] A. Davidson and D. A. Owen, “Elementary particles as higher- dimensional tachyons,” Physics Letters B,vol.177,no.1,pp.77– 81, 1986. [33] G. Horowitz, “ and black strings,” Journal of High Energy Physics,vol.2005,no.08,p.091,2005. [34] M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the new feld theory,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,vol.144,no.852,pp.425–451,1934. Journal of International Journal of Advances in The Scientifc Applied Bionics Chemistry Engineering World Journal Geophysics and Biomechanics Hindawi Hindawi Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Hindawi www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 http://www.hindawi.comwww.hindawi.com Volume 20182013 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Active and Passive Shock and Vibration Electronic Components

Hindawi Hindawi www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Submit your manuscripts at www.hindawi.com

Advances in Advances in Mathematical Physics Astronomy Hindawi Hindawi www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018

International Journal of Rotating Machinery Advances in Optical Advances in Technologies OptoElectronics

Advances in Advances in Physical Chemistry Hindawi Hindawi Hindawi Hindawi Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 Hindawi Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com www.hindawi.com

International Journal of Journal of Antennas and Advances in Advances in International Journal of Chemistry Propagation High Energy Physics Acoustics and Vibration Optics Hindawi Hindawi Hindawi Hindawi Hindawi www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018