STRATEGIC TRENDS 2017 Key Developments in Global Affairs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STRATEGIC TRENDS 2017 Key Developments in Global Affairs Center for Security Studies STRATEGIC TRENDS 2017 Key Developments in Global Affairs Editors: Oliver Thränert, Martin Zapfe Series Editor: Andreas Wenger Authors: Daniel Keohane, Christian Nünlist, Jack Thompson, Martin Zapfe CSS ETH Zurich STRATEGIC TRENDS 2017 is also electronically available at: www.css.ethz.ch/publications/strategic-trends Editors STRATEGIC TRENDS 2017: Oliver Thränert, Martin Zapfe Series Editor STRATEGIC TRENDS: Andreas Wenger Contact: Center for Security Studies ETH Zurich Haldeneggsteig 4, IFW CH-8092 Zurich Switzerland This publication covers events up to 3 March 2017. © 2017, Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich Images © by Reuters ISSN 1664-0667 ISBN 978-3-905696-58-5 CHAPTER 1 Contested History: Rebuilding Trust in European Security Christian Nünlist Different interpretations of the recent past still cast a negative shadow on the relations between Russia and the West. The Ukraine Crisis was a symptom, but not the deeper cause of Russia’s disengagement from the European peace order of 1990. While the current situation is far from a “new Cold War”, reconstructing contested history and debating missed opportu- nities are needed today to create trust and overcome European insecurity. US President George H. W. Bush and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev shake hands at the end of a press conference in Moscow on 31 July 1991. 11 STRATEGIC TRENDS 2017 History is back. Recent developments speak of a “new Cold War” and recom- have made clear that ghosts from the mend a return to a strategy of contain- past still cast a negative shadow on ment, echoing the ghost of US Cold the current political dialogue between War diplomat George F. Kennan.2 Russia and the West. In addition to Others even invoke the image of a tensions arising from the present, the “Second Versailles”,3 criticizing the al- fact that Russia and the West subscribe leged humiliation of Russia after 1991 to diametrically opposed narratives on and the absence of a “new Marshall the evolution of the European security Plan” for Russia in the 1990s.4 On the order after 1990 prevents a common other hand, commentators complain view on the causes and origins of to- about Russia’s neo-imperialist appear- day’s problems. These different inter- ance, the claim for special treatment, pretations of the recent past continue the references to its unique civilization, to shape the world today. and exclusive spheres of influence.5 The Ukraine Crisis was a symptom, These are not purely academic discus- but not the deeper cause of Russia’s sions. The Western narrative is also disengagement from the European contested by the sitting Russian lead- peace order of 1990. The collapse of er. President Vladimir Putin has often a common perspective on European complained that the West promised security originated much earlier. The Moscow it would not accept any of current confrontation between Russia the former Warsaw Pact members and the political West and the broken into NATO in 1990. He therefore re- European security architecture must gards NATO’s expansion as a Western be understood as a crisis foretold. In betrayal. 2014, the “cold peace” between Russia and the West after 1989 turned into a Radically different interpretations of “little Cold War”.1 the steps that led from cooperation to confrontation complicate a return This burden of the past bedevils the back to dialogue, trust, and coopera- current debate about Russia’s role in tion. A high-level Panel of Eminent Europe. Historical analogies are often Persons (PEP) launched by Switzer- invoked in discussions over the nature land, Serbia, and Germany identified of the current state of affairs, or in try- these divergent narratives about the ing to explain how we arrived from the recent past as “a main problem of to- high hopes of 1989 at the hostilities of day’s relations between Russia and the today. On the one hand, some observers West”. Its report “Back to Diplomacy” 12 CONTESTED HISTORY (2015) called for a research project for the descent from cooperation to that would systematically analyze the confrontation. Rather, the newly different views on the history of Euro- available documentary evidence al- pean security since 1990 and examine lows us to better understand ana- how and why they developed.6 lytically the motives, behavior, and actions on all sides and to provide In this sense, the present chapter aims a more nuanced version with more to make a modest contribution to- clarity of what really happened be- wards placing post-1989 events in hind closed doors from the fall of the their proper historical context – with Berlin Wall to the disintegration of a view to the confrontation of our day the Soviet Union. and possible future ways out of the current stalemate. Naturally, the first This chapter is structured around pre- drafts of history are always based on senting three central arguments: First, little empirical evidence. As long as the often-heard historical analogy, official documents are classified (usu- suggesting that the current situation ally 25 – 30 years), studies have to rely should be labeled a “new cold war” is largely on memoirs and testimonies of scrutinized, but ultimately rejected as eyewitnesses. This first phase of his- an inaccurate metaphor which is also toriography often promotes a politi- misleading for shaping current politi- cized history, with former policymak- cal decisions in the West. Second, I ar- ers wanting to put their actions in the gue that the crux of Russia’s sense of best possible light. Recently, however, marginalization within the European archives in the US, Russia, Germany, peace order lies in the failure to im- and elsewhere have been opened, al- plement the Cold War settlement and lowing solid historiographical inter- the common vision of a pan-Europe- pretations of what was going on be- an, inclusive security architecture – hind the scenes in the early post-Cold and in misunderstandings about what War period. Contemporary historians had been agreed upon in the high-lev- can now provide valuable corrections el diplomatic talks between the West to early myth-making (whether inten- and the Soviet Union that ended the tional or unintentional) by adding new Cold War in 1990. Third, I argue empirical, archival evidence and a well- that any renewed effort to deal con- founded historical view to the debate.7 structively with the other side needs to start with understanding previous The aim of this chapter is not to place missed opportunities and learning blame on one side as the main culprit from the past. The deeper causes of 13 STRATEGIC TRENDS 2017 Russia’s current disengagement from the roots of the current confrontation Europe must be discussed and clari- between Russia and the West. The fied. By exposing myths, reconstruct- missed opportunity for a successful ing contested history may contribute integration of Russia into European towards tearing down the currently security structures after 1989 puts poisoned propagandistic echo cham- into perspective the Western nar- bers and creating trust and confidence rative of the end of the Cold War, in the present situation. An open, in- hitherto often portrayed as a success clusive dialogue similar to the historic story. While the enlargement rounds Helsinki process could be a viable way of NATO and the EU have provided out of today’s crisis. security and prosperity to Central and Eastern European countries, the If it was possible to create the basis failure to find an acceptable place for for peaceful coexistence in Europe in Russia within the European security a cumbersome, multilateral negotia- framework contributed to a new di- tion marathon during the Cold War, viding line in Europe and instability. this should also be possible in the 21st century – despite, or precisely because A more nuanced understanding of the of, the currently difficult conditions. recent past, as advanced in this chap- However, it should also be remem- ter, is in no way meant to justify Rus- bered that the historic Helsinki pro- sia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2014. But cess could only be launched ten years it should serve as a reminder that the after the Berlin Wall had been built West and Russia have not yet found a and after West and East had accepted solution to overcome European inse- their respective spheres of influences curity and have yet to realize the vi- in Europe. Today, patience is needed sion of indivisible European security. for setting up a similar multilateral Or in the words of Italian philosopher exercise within the framework of the George Santayana (1863 – 1952): Organization for Security and Coop- “Those who cannot remember the eration in Europe (OSCE). Disputed past are condemned to repeat it.”8 territories and overlapping spheres of influence make the situation today A New Cold War? Characteristics much more complicate. of the Current Confrontation Russia’s land grab of Crimea and its It is opportune now to critically review (initially denied) military interven- the terms of the Cold War settlement tion in Eastern Ukraine brought back in Europe in 1990 to better understand memories of the original East-West 14 CONTESTED HISTORY Cold War versus Today Population in millions USSR Russia USA 1984 274.9 236.4 2016 143.4 324.1 Real GDP per capita in USD 1984 6,700 30,816 2015 11,039 51,054 Defense spending in billion USD 1988 246 293 2015 66 596 Nuclear arsenal 1984 36,825 23,459 2017 7,000 6,800 Sources: The CIA World Factbook 1984; Worldometers; Allen, Robert C., “The Rise and Decline of the Soviet Economy”, in: The Cana- dian Journal of Economics 34, no. 4 (2001); fred.stlouisfed.org; SIPRI; ourworldindata.org; Arms Control Association; multpl.com 15 STRATEGIC TRENDS 2017 confrontation in Europe.
Recommended publications
  • Yalta Conference
    Yalta Conference 1 The Conference All three leaders were attempting to establish an agenda for governing post-war Europe. They wanted to keep peace between post-world war countries. On the Eastern Front, the front line at the end of December 1943 re- mained in the Soviet Union but, by August 1944, So- viet forces were inside Poland and parts of Romania as part of their drive west.[1] By the time of the Conference, Red Army Marshal Georgy Zhukov's forces were 65 km (40 mi) from Berlin. Stalin’s position at the conference was one which he felt was so strong that he could dic- tate terms. According to U.S. delegation member and future Secretary of State James F. Byrnes, "[i]t was not a question of what we would let the Russians do, but what Yalta Conference in February 1945 with (from left to right) we could get the Russians to do.”[2] Moreover, Roosevelt Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin. Also hoped for a commitment from Stalin to participate in the present are Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov (far left); United Nations. Field Marshal Sir Alan Brooke, Admiral of the Fleet Sir Andrew Cunningham, RN, Marshal of the RAF Sir Charles Portal, RAF, Premier Stalin, insisting that his doctors opposed any (standing behind Churchill); General George C. Marshall, Chief long trips, rejected Roosevelt’s suggestion to meet at the of Staff of the United States Army, and Fleet Admiral William Mediterranean.[3] He offered instead to meet at the Black D. Leahy, USN, (standing behind Roosevelt).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the 5/42 Regiment of Evzones: a Study on National Resistance and Civil War in Greece 1941-1944
    The Rise and Fall of the 5/42 Regiment of Evzones: A Study on National Resistance and Civil War in Greece 1941-1944 ARGYRIOS MAMARELIS Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy The European Institute London School of Economics and Political Science 2003 i UMI Number: U613346 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U613346 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 9995 / 0/ -hoZ2 d X Abstract This thesis addresses a neglected dimension of Greece under German and Italian occupation and on the eve of civil war. Its contribution to the historiography of the period stems from the fact that it constitutes the first academic study of the third largest resistance organisation in Greece, the 5/42 regiment of evzones. The study of this national resistance organisation can thus extend our knowledge of the Greek resistance effort, the political relations between the main resistance groups, the conditions that led to the civil war and the domestic relevance of British policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Guide
    TRAVEL GUIDE Traces of the COLD WAR PERIOD The Countries around THE BALTIC SEA Johannes Bach Rasmussen 1 Traces of the Cold War Period: Military Installations and Towns, Prisons, Partisan Bunkers Travel Guide. Traces of the Cold War Period The Countries around the Baltic Sea TemaNord 2010:574 © Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen 2010 ISBN 978-92-893-2121-1 Print: Arco Grafisk A/S, Skive Layout: Eva Ahnoff, Morten Kjærgaard Maps and drawings: Arne Erik Larsen Copies: 1500 Printed on environmentally friendly paper. This publication can be ordered on www.norden.org/order. Other Nordic publications are available at www.norden.org/ publications Printed in Denmark T R 8 Y 1 K 6 S 1- AG NR. 54 The book is produced in cooperation between Øhavsmuseet and The Baltic Initiative and Network. Øhavsmuseet (The Archipelago Museum) Department Langelands Museum Jens Winthers Vej 12, 5900 Rudkøbing, Denmark. Phone: +45 63 51 63 00 E-mail: [email protected] The Baltic Initiative and Network Att. Johannes Bach Rasmussen Møllegade 20, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark. Phone: +45 35 36 05 59. Mobile: +45 30 25 05 59 E-mail: [email protected] Top: The Museum of the Barricades of 1991, Riga, Latvia. From the Days of the Barricades in 1991 when people in the newly independent country tried to defend key institutions from attack from Soviet military and security forces. Middle: The Anna Akhmatova Museum, St. Petersburg, Russia. Handwritten bark book with Akhmatova’s lyrics. Made by a GULAG prisoner, wife of an executed “enemy of the people”. Bottom: The Museum of Genocide Victims, Vilnius, Lithuania.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 UNNEGOTIATED TRANSITION . SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME: THE PROCESSES OF DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN GREECE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Neovi M, Karakatsanis, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rearguard of Freedom: the John Birch Society and the Development
    The Rearguard of Freedom: The John Birch Society and the Development of Modern Conservatism in the United States, 1958-1968 by Bart Verhoeven, MA (English, American Studies), BA (English and Italian Languages) Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Arts July 2015 Abstract This thesis aims to investigate the role of the anti-communist John Birch Society within the greater American conservative field. More specifically, it focuses on the period from the Society's inception in 1958 to the beginning of its relative decline in significance, which can be situated after the first election of Richard M. Nixon as president in 1968. The main focus of the thesis lies on challenging more traditional classifications of the JBS as an extremist outcast divorced from the American political mainstream, and argues that through their innovative organizational methods, national presence, and capacity to link up a variety of domestic and international affairs to an overarching conspiratorial narrative, the Birchers were able to tap into a new and powerful force of largely white suburban conservatives and contribute significantly to the growth and development of the post-war New Right. For this purpose, the research interrogates the established scholarship and draws upon key primary source material, including official publications, internal communications and the private correspondence of founder and chairman Robert Welch as well as other prominent members. Acknowledgments The process of writing a PhD dissertation seems none too dissimilar from a loving marriage. It is a continuous and emotionally taxing struggle that leaves the individual's ego in constant peril, subjugates mind and soul to an incessant interplay between intense passion and grinding routine, and in most cases should not drag on for over four years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Civil War in the Czech Press Konstantinos Tsivos
    The Greek Civil War in the Czech Press Konstantinos Tsivos | Neograeca Bohemica | 15 | 2015 | 65–87 | Abstract The Greek Civil War was the fi rst open confrontation in Europe between the Eastern block and the West aft er the Second World War. This confrontation did not only develop on the battlefront, but also on the propaganda front, inside Greece and abroad. Czechoslovakia was actively involved in the Greek Civil War, mainly by sending military equipment to Greece and by providing asylum to approximately 4,000 child refugees. The Greek Civil War was prominent in the Czechoslovakian press throughout its duration (1946–1949). This article, based on material from the Prague National Archives, analyses the events of the Civil War as presented by Czech newspapers. In addition, this presentation refl ects on the confrontation between the political forces that formed the National Front government of Czechoslovakia, before and aft er February 1948. There is also special reference to the activities of the propaganda machine that the Greek Communist Party had established in Prague at this time. Keywords Greek Civil War, Czechoslovak Press, Cold War, February 1948, polarization, propaganda 67 | Th e Greek Civil War in the Czech Press In March 1945 the Czechoslovak National Front government was formed. All the Czech and Slovak anti-fascist parties were equally represented in it, each by three ministers. The Communist Party, which had the leading role in form- ing the government liberation program, took control of three ministries that played a crucial part in the orientation of the country: these were the minis- tries of Interior, Agriculture and Information.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Arizona
    Erskine Caldwell, Margaret Bourke- White, and the Popular Front (Moscow 1941) Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Caldwell, Jay E. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 05/10/2021 10:56:28 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/316913 ERSKINE CALDWELL, MARGARET BOURKE-WHITE, AND THE POPULAR FRONT (MOSCOW 1941) by Jay E. Caldwell __________________________ Copyright © Jay E. Caldwell 2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2014 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Jay E. Caldwell, titled “Erskine Caldwell, Margaret Bourke-White, and the Popular Front (Moscow 1941),” and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Dissertation Director: Jerrold E. Hogle _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Daniel F. Cooper Alarcon _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Jennifer L. Jenkins _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Robert L. McDonald _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Charles W. Scruggs Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
    [Show full text]
  • British Perfidy in Greece: a Story Worth Remembering - Ed Vulliamy and Helena Smith
    British perfidy in Greece: a story worth remembering - Ed Vulliamy and Helena Smith An account of the time in 1944 when the British Army, at war with Germany switched their allegiance, opening fire upon – and arming Greek collaborators with the Nazis to fire upon – a civilian crowd in Syntagma Square. “I can still see it very clearly, I have not forgotten,” says Titos Patrikios; “the police firing on the crowd from the roof of the parliament at the top of Syntagma Square in Athens. The young men and women lying in pools of blood, everyone rushing down the stairs in total shock, total panic.” And then came the defining moment: the recklessness of jeunesse, the passion of belief in a justice burning bright: “I jumped up on the fountain in the middle of the square, the one that is still there, and I began to shout: “Comrades, don’t disperse! Victory will be ours! Don’t leave. The time has come. We will win!” “I was,” he says now, “absolutely sure, profoundly sure, that we were going to win”. But there was no winning that day; just as there was no pretending that what had happened would not change the history of a country that, liberated from Adolf Hitler’s Reich barely six weeks earlier, was now surging headlong towards bloody civil war. Seventy years may have passed but time has not diminished how Titos Patrikios felt that day. Nor has it dented his recollection of events. Even now, at 86, when he “laughs at and with myself that I have reached such an age”, the poet can remember, scene-for-scene, shot for shot, what happened on the central square of Greek political life, on the morning of December 3, 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of the Second Polish Republic
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Summer 2013 Drugi Potop: The Fall of the Second Polish Republic Wesley Kent Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, Military History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Kent, Wesley, "Drugi Potop: The Fall of the Second Polish Republic" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 851. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/851 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 DRUGI POTOP: THE FALL OF THE SECOND POLISH REPUBLIC by Wesley Kent (Under the Direction of John W. Steinberg) ABSTRACT This thesis seeks to examine the factors that resulted in the fall of the Second Polish Republic and track its downward trajectory. Examining the Second Republic, from its creation in 1918 to its loss of recognition in 1945, reveals that its demise began long before German tanks violated Poland’s frontiers on 1 September, 1939. Commencing with the competing ideas of what a Polish state would be and continuing through the political and foreign policy developments of the inter-war years, a pattern begins to emerge - that of the Poles’ search for their place in modern Europe. The lead up to the Second World War and the invasion of Poland by the German-Soviet Alliance demonstrates the failure of the Poles to achieve that place.
    [Show full text]
  • Losing the War in the Ether: Radio Free Europe's Defeat in the Cultural Cold War with Poland Pawel Koscielny Summer 2017 Pawel
    Losing the War in the Ether: Radio Free Europe’s Defeat in the Cultural Cold War with Poland Pawel Koscielny Summer 2017 Pawel Koscielny is a graduate student in the Department of History at the University of California, Berkeley. Losing the War in the Ether Radio Free Europe’s Defeat in the Cultural Cold War with Poland ______________________________________________________________________________ Pawel Koscielny Jan Nowak Jezioriański’s memoir Wojna w Eterze (War in the Ether) recounts his role in what he understood as a global war over hearts and minds. Jezioriański was a Polish émigré and the director of Radio Free Europe’s (RFE) Polish desk. By many accounts, his position was akin to the point of the spear of Western counterpropaganda efforts in the Soviet Bloc. He retired and ended his diaries in 1976, while the war in the ether still hung in the balance. But he was convinced that the triumph of the West in what we now call the Cultural Cold War was assured, and 1989 seems to have vindicated his optimism. His fellow émigrés and former RFE executives have written the history of the Radio in such a way that their victory appears both decisive and predetermined. According to their account, the Radio transmitted the very substance of freedom into the Bloc via the voice of émigré broadcasters, simultaneously eroding the structure of totalitarian communism and breathing life into a courageous but misguided opposition movement. Yet their own archive tells a different story. The Polish desk struggled to develop a workable understanding of its own listeners, though it spent millions on covert research.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Forgetting: New Zealand-Greek Wartime Relationship
    Politics of Forgetting: New Zealand-Greek Wartime Relationship Martyn Brown Bachelor of Arts Graduate Diploma Library Science Graduate Diploma Information Technology Post-Graduate Diploma Business Research Master of Arts (Research) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of History Philosophy Religion and Classics Abstract In extant New Zealand literature and national public commemoration, the New Zealand experience of wartime Greece largely focuses on the Battle of Crete in May 1941 and, to a lesser extent, on the failed earlier mainland campaign. At a politico-military level, the ill-fated Greek venture and the loss of Crete hold centre stage in the discourse. In terms of commemoration, the Battle of Crete dominates as an iconic episode in the national history of New Zealand. As far as the Greeks are concerned, New Zealand elevates and embraces Greek civilians to the point where they overshadow the Greek military. The New Zealand drive to place the Battle of Crete as supporting its national self-imagining has been achieved, but what has been forgotten in the process? The wartime connection between the Pacific nation and Greece lasted for the remainder of the international conflict and was highly complex and sometimes violent. In occupied Greece and Crete, as well as in the Middle East, North Africa and Italy, New Zealand forces had to interact with a divided Greek nation that had been experiencing ongoing political turmoil and intermittent civil conflict. Individual New Zealanders found themselves acting as liaison officers with competing partisan groups. Greek military units with a history of mutiny and political intrigue were affiliated with the main New Zealand fighting force, the Second New Zealand Division.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Second Crusade
    America’s Second Crusade America’s Second Crusade William Henry Chamberlin Liberty Fund Indianapolis Amagi books are published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a foundation established to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi ), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 b.c. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash. First published in 1950 by Henry Regnery Company. Printed in the United States of America p 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Chamberlin, William Henry, 1897–1969. America’s second crusade / William Henry Chamberlin. p. cm. Originally published: Chicago: Regnery, 1950. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-86597-707-5 (pb: alk. paper) 1. World War, 1939–1945—Diplomatic history. 2. World War, 1939–1945—United States. I. Title. d753.c55 2008 940.53ʹ2—dc22 2008002559 Liberty Fund, inc. 8335 Allison Pointe Trail, Suite 300 Indianapolis, Indiana 46250-1684 Contents Introduction vii 1. The First Crusade 1 2. Communism and Fascism: Offspring of the War 24 3. The Collapse of Versailles 39 4. Debacle in the West 71 5. “Again and Again and Again” 96 6. Road to War: The Atlantic 127 7. Road to War: The Pacific 153 8. The Coalition of the Big Three 184 9. The Munich Called Yalta: War’s End 213 10.
    [Show full text]